SEEDLESS WATERMELON VARIETY TRIAL, Shubin K. Saha, Extension Vegetable Specialist University of Kentucky
|
|
|
- Cory Watson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SEEDLESS WATERMELON VARIETY TRIAL, 2016 Shubin K. Saha, Extension Vegetable Specialist University of Kentucky
2 Background watermelons were grown on 1,116 acres 2 nd largest fresh market vegetable in KY 16% of the total fresh market vegetable acreage Watermelons are grown in various areas across the state including Casey, Lincoln, Hart, Allen, Christian, Todd, Scott, Taylor, and Daviess counties Potential for increased production
3 Production Methods Plasticulture black plastic mulch and drip tape Pre-plant fertilizer: 110 lbs urea 84 lbs muriate of potash Watermelon plots: 8 centers, 40 rows, 48 in-row, 10 plants/plot, 5 pollinators/plot (SP-6) Command pre-emergent herbicide applied 0.67 pt/acre Seeded April 18 and Transplanted May 23 Fertigation applications at 9 lbs N per acre alternating with calcium nitrate and potassium nitrate weekly
4 Production Methods Vines turned weekly June 10 July 1 Melcast utilized for fungicide applications Scouting weekly for arthropod pests Insecticides/miticides applied based on ID-36 recommendations Fruit Harvested Weekly (5 weeks): July 19- August 16 4 fruit per variety per rep (12 total) sampled for quality Commercial Farm in Scott County
5 Harvest and Quality
6 Fruit Weight (lbs) per acre 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000
7 Table 1a. Yield of seedless watermelon varieties, Variety Seed Source Total Fruit Weight (lbs) per plot z Total Fruit Number per plot Fruit Weight (lbs) per acre Fruit Number per acre Talca OR A y 25.3 A 61,522 A 3,448.5 A Maxima OR AB 21.0 AB 52,001 AB 2,858.6 AB Exclamation SY ABC 20.0 ABC 47,045 ABC 2,722.5 ABC Excursion SY BCD 18.0 BCD 43,535 BCD 2,450.3 BCD Razorback HI BCDE 20.3 ABC 42,410 BCDE 2,767.9 ABC Crunchy Red HM BCDE 20.0 ABC 42,320 BCDE 2,722.5 ABC Summer Breeze S BCDEF 20.3 ABC 41,892 BCDEF 2,767.9 ABC Wolverine HI BCDEF 18.7 ABCD 41,865 BCDEF 2,541.0 ABCD Neptune SW BCDEF 21.0 AB 41,852 BCDEF 2,858.6 AB Joy Ride S BCDEFG 18.7 ABCD 40,159 BCDEFG 2,541.0 ABCD Unbridled SK BCDEFGH 18.3 BCD 38,219 BCDEFGH 2,495.6 BCD Kingman SK CDEFGH 18.0 BCD 36,838 CDEFGH 2,450.3 BCD UGR UG CDEFGHI 17.0 BCDE 35,864 CDEFGHI 2,314.1 BCDE UGR UG CDEFGHI 14.0 CDEF 35,647 CDEFGHI 1,905.8 CDEF Charismatic SK CDEFGHI 15.3 BCDEF 35,501 CDEFGHI 2,087.3 BCDEF KB12106 KB CDEFGHI 17.3 BCD 35,404 CDEFGHI 2,359.5 BCD Sweet Dawn SY CDEFGHI 15.3 BCDEF 34,567 CDEFGHI 2,087.3 BCDEF KB15010 KB CDEFGHI 17.7 BCD 33,811 CDEFGHI 2,404.9 BCD Road Trip S CDEFGHI 17.0 BCDE 33,702 CDEFGHI 2,314.1 BCDE Fascination SY CDEFGHI 15.7 BCDEF 33,571 CDEFGHI 2,132.6 BCDEF z Plot size: 320 ft 2. y Means within columns separated by Fisher s least significant test (P 0.05), means with same letter are not significantly different.
8 Table 1b. Yield of seedless watermelon varieties, Variety Seed Source Total Fruit Weight (lbs) per plot z Total Fruit Number per plot Fruit Weight (lbs) per acre Fruit Number per acre ORS 6227 OR CDEFGHI 15.0 BCDEF 33,355 CDEFGHI 2,041.9 BCDEF Secretariat SK CDEFGHIJ 16.3 BCDE 32,312 CDEFGHIJ 2,223.4 BCDE Traveler HM CDEFGHIJ 16.7 BCDE 32,207 CDEFGHIJ 2,268.8 BCDE Captivation SY DEFGHIJ 16.3 BCDE 31,572 DEFGHIJ 2,223.4 BCDE UGR UG DEFGHIJ 14.3 BCDEF 31,002 DEFGHIJ 1,951.1 BCDEF Sugar Fresh SY EFGHIJ 14.3 BCDEF 27,765 EFGHIJ 1,951.1 BCDEF Wayfarer HM FGHIJ 14.3 BCDEF 27,184 FGHIJ 1,951.1 BCDEF Poseidon SW GHIJ 14.7 BCDEF 26,379 GHIJ 1,996.5 BCDEF ORS 6064B OR GHIJ 14.3 BCDEF 26,131 GHIJ 1,951.1 BCDEF Prime KY HIJ 12.7 DEF 24,540 HIJ 1,724.3 DEF 3F-4139 KY HIJ 13.0 DEF 23,724 HIJ 1,769.6 DEF ORS 12154b OR HIJ 13.7 CDEF 23,563 HIJ 1,860.4 CDEF Chubbiness KY IJ 13.0 DEF 20,995 IJ 1,769.6 DEF 3-F4221 KY J 10.3 EF 18,243 J 1,406.6 EF 3F-2186 KY J 9.3 F 17,717 J 1,270.5 F z Plot size: 320 ft 2. y Means within columns separated by Fisher s least significant test (P 0.05), means with same letter are not significantly different.
9 90 Total Bins per acre
10 able 2a. Seedless watermelon varieties by average fruit weight by percentage and total bins, Variety Total Bins per acre 60-count 45-count 36-count 30-count lbs lbs lbs >21.4 lbs alca 86.7 A z 14 M ABCDEF 24 AB axima 74.1 AB 17 LM AB 28 A xclamation 65.0 BC 19 JKLM ABCDEFGH 16 BCD runchy Red 61.5 BCD 28 FGHIJKLM ABC 3 EFG ummer Breeze 60.3 BCD 38 FGHIJKLM ABCDEFGH 5 EFG xcursion 59.7 BCDE 24 HIJKLM ABCDEFG 23 ABC olverine 59.7 BCDE 18 LM AB 5 DEFG azorback 59.5 BCDE 32 FGHIJKLM ABCDE 2 EFG eptune 59.2 BCDE 46 CDEFGH DEFGHIJ 3 EFG oy Ride 58.0 BCDEG 24 HIJKLM ABCD 3 EFG nbridled 55.0 BCDEGH 31 FGHIJKLM BCDEFGHI 5 DEFG ingman 51.9 CDEGHI 38 FGHIJKLM DEFGHIJ 7 DEFG GR CDEGHI 35 FGHIJKLM ABCDEFGH 8 DEFG harismatic 51.2 CDEGHI 18 KLM AB 13 CDE B CDEGHI 44 DEFGHIJK 37 8 HIJ 12 DEF weet Dawn 49.7 CDEGHI 25 GHIJKLM A 9 DEFG B CDEGHI 46 CDEFGHI CDEFGHIJ 0 G RS CDEGHI 20 IJKLM A 7 DEFG ascination 47.9 CDEGHI 36 FGHIJKLM EFGHIJ 9 DEFG Means within columns separated by Fisher s least significant difference test (P< 0.05), means with same letter
11 Table 2b. Seedless watermelon varieties by average fruit weight by percentage and total bins, Variety Total Bins per acre 60-count lbs 45-count lbs 36-count lbs 30-count >21.4 lbs Road Trip 47.9 CDEGHI 46 CDEFGHI DEFGHIJ 4 EFG Secretariat 46.4 CDEGHIJ 48 CDEFGH 42 8 HIJ 2 FG Traveler 46.1 CDEGHIJK 48 CDEFGH CDEFGHIJ 3 EFG Captivation 45.1 CDEGHIJK 42 EFGHIJKL 49 9 FGHIJ 0 G UGR DEGHIJK 25 GHIJKLM CDEFGHIJ 5 EFG Sugar Fresh 39.6 EGHIJK 51 BCDEFG DEFGHIJ 0 G UGR GHIJK 42 EFGHIJKL 53 4 IJ 2 FG Wayfarer 38.8 GHIJK 53 ABCDEF 37 8 HIJ 2 EFG ORS 6064B 38.1 GHIJK 53 ABCDEF 42 5 IJ 0 G Poseidon 37.8 GHIJK 65 ABCDE 30 2 IJ 3 EFG Prime 35.0 HIJK 44 DEFGHIJ FGHIJ 0 G 3F IJK 68 ABCD 20 9 GHIJ 3 EFG ORS 12154b 34.5 IJK 70 ABC 27 3 IJ 0 G Chubbiness 31.8 IJK 75 AB 25 0 J 0 G 3-F JK 77 A 20 2 IJ 2 FG 3F K 50 BCDEFG 45 4 IJ 0 G z Means within columns separated by Fisher s least significant difference test (P< 0.05), means with same letter are not significantly different. Means without letters were not statistically different.
12 12 Brix
13 Table 3a. Fruit quality of seedless watermelon varieties, Four fruit from every replication for each variety. Variety % soluble solids Number of Black Seeds Firmness (lbs-force) Hollow Heart z Road Trip 11.9 A x 0.3 B 3.3 CDEFGH F AB 0.3 B 2.6 IJKL 1.0 Joy Ride 11.6 ABC 0.3 B 3.3 CDEFGHI 1.0 Summer Breeze 11.6 ABC 0.3 B 3.1 DEFGHIJK 1.0 UGR ABC 0.1 B 2.4 KL 2.0 Unbridled 11.5 ABCD 0.3 B 3.2 DEFGHIJ 1.1 3F ABCD 0.3 B 2.4 KL 1.0 Charismatic 11.4 ABCD 2.8 AB 3.7 BCDE 1.2 Prime 11.3 ABCDE 0.0 B 2.1 L 1.1 Wayfarer 11.2 ABCDEF 14.5 A 3.1 DEFGHIJ 1.0 Poseidon 11.1 BCDEFG 0.8 B 2.5 JKL 1.3 UGR BCDEFG 11.8 AB 3.0 FGHIJK 1.2 UGR BCDEFG 0.2 B 2.9 GHIJK 1.5 Wolverine 11.1 BCDEFG 0.5 B 3.3 CDEFGH 1.0 3F BCDEFGH 3.3 AB 3.3 CDEFGH 1.2 Kingman 11.0 BCDEFGH 3.2 AB 3.5 CDEFG 1.0 Secretariat 11.0 BCDEFGH 2.8 AB 3.7 BCDE 1.1 Razorback 11.0 BCDEFGH 0.7 B 3.4 CDEFGH 1.0 Neptune 11.0 CDEFGH 4.3 AB 3.2 CDEFGHIJ 1.0 z Hollow Heart: 1-none, 2-slight carpel separation, 3-One large gap evident, 4-2 large gaps, 5-severe carpel separation, 3 or more large gaps; fruit cut crosswise x Means within columns separated by Fisher s least significant difference test (P 0.05), means with same letter are not significantly different.
14 Table 3b. Fruit quality of seedless watermelon varieties, Four fruit from every replication for each variety. Variety % soluble solids Number of Black Seeds Firmness (lbs-force) Hollow Heart z Chubbiness 10.9 CDEFGH 0.1 B 2.5 JKL 1.0 Sugar Fresh 10.9 CDEFGH 0.2 B 4.3 AB 1.0 KB CDEFGH 4.8 AB 2.7 HIJKL 1.4 Maxima 10.8 DEFGH 0.3 B 2.7 HIJKL 1.2 ORS DEFGH 1.0 B 3.2 DEFGHIJ 1.2 Fascination 10.6 EFGHI 5.5 AB 3.3 CDEFGH 1.0 Sweet Dawn 10.6 EFGHI 5.7 AB 3.1 DEFGHIJK 1.0 Captivation 10.6 FGHI 0.4 B 3.9 ABC 1.0 Exclamation 10.5 FGHI 1.3 B 3.0 EFGHIJK 1.0 KB FGHI 0.4 B 3.8 BCD 1.1 Crunchy Red 10.4 GHIJ 1.6 B 3.2 CDEFGHIJ 1.1 Excursion 10.4 HIJ 0.7 B 3.7 BCDEF 1.0 Talca 10.3 HIJ 1.8 AB 3.3 CDEFGHI 1.0 Traveler 10.0 IJ 0.3 B 3.2 CDEFGHIJ 1.0 ORS 6064B 9.9 IJ 0.3 B 4.5 A 1.0 ORS 12154b 9.8 J 1.0 B 2.7 HIJKL 1.2 z Hollow Heart: 1-none, 2-slight carpel separation, 3-One large gap evident, 4-2 large gaps, 5-severe carpel separation, 3 or more large gaps; fruit cut crosswise x Means within columns separated by Fisher s least significant difference test (P 0.05), means with same letter are not significantly different.
15 Talca
16 Maxima
17 Razorback
18 Joy Ride
19 Wolverine
20 Road Trip
21 Unbridled
22 Fascination
23 CANTALOUPE VARIETY TRIAL, 2016
24 Production Methods Seeding: April 14 and April at UK Horticulture Research Farm Transplanted: May 19 in Scott County into black plastic mulch with drip tape 6 ft row spacing, 2.5 ft in-row, 50 ft plot Fertilization and Pest management, similar to watermelon
25 Harvest Dates: July 13-August 8 Three times per week Each fruit was weighed
26 Table 1. Marketable Yield of cantaloupe varieties, Variety Seed Company Number of Fruit per plot z Average Fruit Weight (lbs) Total Fruit Weight (lbs) per plot Number of Fruit per acre Total Fruit Weight (lbs) per acre 8H2111 OG 53.0 A y 6.9 CDE A A A ME3716 SY 38.3 B 6.8 CDE B B B UGR UG 37.7 B 5.4 G BCD B BCD 8H245 OG 35.7 BC 6.3 EF BCD BC BCD ME3743 SY 35.0 BCD 7.4 BC B BCD B 8H277 OG 34.3 BCD 7.1 CD BC BCD BC UGR UG 32.7 BCD 6.3 EF BCD BCD BCD Aphrodite SY 30.0 BCDE 8.4 A BC BCDE BC Orange Sherbet SI 26.0 BCDEF 8.4 A BCD BCDEF BCD Athena SY 24.3 CDEF 6.7 CDE DE CDEF DE 8H229 OG 22.7 DEF 8.1 AB CD DEF CD 8260b OG 19.3 EF 5.4 G E EF E UGR x UG 18.7 EF 5.8 FG E EF E SV5196MF S 17.0 F 6.4 DEF E F E z Plot size: 300 ft 2 y Means in columns separated by Fisher s least significant test (P 0.05), means with same letter are not significantly different. x Galia-Type
27 Yield By Count 8H211 7,696 fruit 8H211
28 Table 1. Marketable Yield of cantaloupe varieties, Variety Seed Company Number of Fruit per plot z Average Fruit Weight (lbs) Total Fruit Weight (lbs) per plot Number of Fruit per acre Total Fruit Weight (lbs) per acre 8H211 OG 53.0 A y 6.9 CDE A A A ME3716 SY 38.3 B 6.8 CDE B B B UGR UG 37.7 B 5.4 G BCD B BCD 8H245 OG 35.7 BC 6.3 EF BCD BC BCD ME3743 Table 1. Marketable SY Yield 35.0 of cantaloupe BCDvarieties, BC B BCD B Seed Number of Fruit Average Fruit Total Fruit Weight Number of Fruit Total Fruit Weight Variety Company per plot z Weight (lbs) (lbs) per plot per acre (lbs) per acre 8H277 OG 34.3 BCD 7.1 CD BC BCD BC 8H2111 OG 53.0 A y 6.9 CDE A A A ME3716 SY 38.3 B 6.8 CDE B B B UGR UG 37.7 B 5.4 G BCD B BCD 8H245 OG 35.7 BC 6.3 EF BCD BC BCD ME3743 SY 35.0 BCD 7.4 BC B BCD B 8H277 OG 34.3 BCD 7.1 CD BC BCD BC UGR UG 32.7 BCD 6.3 EF BCD BCD BCD Aphrodite SY 30.0 BCDE 8.4 A BC BCDE BC Orange Sherbet SI 26.0 BCDEF 8.4 A BCD BCDE F BCD Athena SY 24.3 CDEF 6.7 CDE DE CDEF DE 8H229 OG 22.7 DEF 8.1 AB CD DEF CD 8260b OG 19.3 EF 5.4 G E EF E UGR x UG 18.7 EF 5.8 FG E EF E SV5196MF UG S 17.0 F 6.4 DEF E F E z Plot size: 300 ft 2 UGR UG 32.7 BCD 6.3 EF BCD BCD BCD Aphrodite SY 30.0 BCDE 8.4 A BC BCDE BC Orange Sherbet SI 26.0 BCDEF 8.4 A BCD BCDEF BCD Athena SY 24.3 CDEF 6.7 CDE DE CDEF DE 8H229 OG 22.7 DEF 8.1 AB CD DEF CD 8260b OG 19.3 EF 5.4 G E EF E UGR x y Means in columns separated by Fisher s least significant test (P 0.05), means with same letter are not significantly different. x Galia-Type 18.7 EF 5.8 FG E EF E SV5196MF S 17.0 F 6.4 DEF E F E z Plot size: 300 ft 2 y Means in columns separated by Fisher s least significant test (P 0.05), means with same letter are not significantly different. x Galia-Type
29 Average Fruit Weight 1. 8H Orange Sherbet 3. Aphrodite 1 3 2
30 Fruit Quality Soluble Solids (Brix) Fruit Length and Width Seed Cavity Length and Width Firmness
31 Table 2. Fruit quality of cantaloupe varieties, Variety Seed Company Brix (% Soluble Solids) Length (in) Seed Cavity Width (in) Firmness (lbs-force) Length (in) Overall Width (in) SV5196MF S 14.0 A z 4.5 CDE 2.9 ABC 4.7 AB 6.9 E 6.4 C UGR UG 13.4 AB 4.1 DEF 2.8 ABCD 4.1 BCDE 6.9 E 5.8 D 8H277 OG 12.9 BC 5.4 AB 3.1 AB 3.3 EFGH 8.8 A 6.9 AB 8260b OG 12.2 CD 4.3 CDEF 2.2 E 5.0 A 7.3 DE 6.7 ABC UGR UG 12.1 CD 2.9 I 2.4 CDE 3.7 CDEF 5.5 F 5.5 D 8H229 OG 11.7 DE 4.9 BC 2.4 CDE 4.4 ABC 8.2 ABC 7.0 A Orange Sherbet SI 11.6 DE 5.7 A 3.3 A 3.4 EFG 8.3 AB 6.6 ABC 8H245 OG 11.5 DE 4.7 CD 2.3 DE 3.2 FGH 7.5 CDE 6.8 ABC Athena SY 11.5 DE 3.1 HI 2.6 BCDE 2.8 GH 5.4 F 5.6 D ME3743 SY 10.9 EF 3.3 GHI 2.6 BCDE 4.2 ABCD 5.9 F 5.8 D 8H2111 OG 10.8 EFG 4.7 BCD 2.6 BCDE 3.5 DEFG 8.0 BCD 6.9 AB Aphrodite SY 10.8 EFG 3.7 FGH 3.3 A 2.5 H 6.0 F 6.4 BC ME3716 SY 10.3 FG 3.9 EFG 3.0 AB 3.6 DEFG 6.9 E 6.3 C UGR Y UG 9.8 G 4.1 DEF 2.2 E 3.1 FGH 7.0 E 6.5 ABC z Means in columns separated by Fisher s least significant test (P 0.05), means with same letter are not significantly different. Y Galia type
32 Soluble Solids SV5196MF (lowest fruit count though)
33 Aphrodite Athena
34 UGR Orange Sherbert
35 8H277 8H211
36 Contact: Shubin K. Saha Acknowledgements John Walsh, John Snyder, Vegetable Extension Farm Crew, Sharpe Family, Kentucky Vegetable Growers Association, Kentucky Horticulture Council, Jiffy, Harris Moran, Seminis, Syngenta, United Genetics, Known You, Origene, KB Development, HiMark Seeds, Sakata, and Seedway
Southwest Indiana Triploid Watermelon Variety Trial 2012
Southwest Indiana Triploid Watermelon Variety Trial 2012 Shubin K. Saha, Vegetable Extension Specialist, and Larry Sutterer, Agriculture Technician Purdue University Department of Horticulture and Landscape
VARIETY TRIALS Shubin K. Saha and Dan Egel, SWPAC
WATERMELON AND MUSKMELON VARIETY TRIALS 2010 Shubin K. Saha and Dan Egel, SWPAC The Indiana monthly precipitation and temperature data for May through September and the rank of each period out of the 115-year
Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Materials and Methods... 1 Results... 2 Acknowledgements... 3 Table 1. Entries in the 2015 Watermelon Variety
Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Materials and Methods... 1 Results... 2 Acknowledgements... 3 Table 1. Entries in the 2015 Watermelon Variety Trial... 4 Table 2. 2015 Seedless Watermelon Variety Trial:
Seedless Watermelon Variety Trial Results 2016
Seedless Watermelon Variety Trial Results 2016 Gordon Johnson & Emmalea Ernest University of Delaware Elbert N. & Ann V. Carvel Research and Education Center 16483 County Seat Highway Georgetown, Delaware
Cantaloupe Variety Trial for Kentucky, 2016
Cantaloupe Variety Trial for Kentucky, 2016 John Walsh, Shubin K. Saha, and John Snyder University of Kentucky, 1100 S. Limestone, N 318, Lexington, KY 40546 0091 shubin.saha@uky.edu Cantaloupe is the
Watermelon and Cantaloupe Variety Trials 2014
Southwest Purdue Agricultural Center Watermelon and Cantaloupe Variety Trials 2014 Presented at a meeting of the Southwest Indiana Melon and Vegetable Growers Association November 20, 2014. Presentation:
Watermelon Variety Trials in Southwest Indiana 2016 Introduction Materials and Methods
Watermelon Variety Trials in Southwest Indiana 2016 Wenjing Guan, Daniel S. Egel and Dennis Nowaskie Southwest Purdue Agricultural Center, Vincennes, IN, 47591 Introduction Indiana is one of the major
Southwest Indiana Muskmelon Variety Trial 2013
Southwest Indiana Muskmelon Trial 2013 Shubin K. Saha 1 and Larry Sutterer 2 1 Vegetable Extension Specialist, Department of Horticulture, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546 2 Agriculture Technician,
Evaluation of Seedless Watermelon Varieties for Production in Southwest Indiana, 2010
Evaluation of Seedless Watermelon Varieties for Production in Southwest Indiana, 2010 Shubin K. Saha 1 and Daniel Egel 2 1 Vegetable Extension Specialist, Horticulture and Landscape Architecture Department,
Fall Pepper Variety Evaluation
Fall Pepper Evaluation Submitted by Monica Ozores-Hampton, Gene McAvoy, Chris Miller and Richard Raid University of Florida/SWFREC Palm Beach, FL February 6, 2015 Table 1. Summary of cultural practices
Table of Contents Introduction Materials and Methods Results
Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Materials and Methods... 2 Results... 2 Acknowledgements... 4 Table 1. 2010 Specialty Melon Variety Trial: Varieties by in Lbs/A... 5 Table 2. 2010 Specialty Melon Variety
Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Materials and Methods... 1 Results... 2 Acknowledgements... 3 Table Seedless Watermelon Variety Trial:
Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Materials and Methods... 1 Results... 2 Acknowledgements... 3 Table 1. 2012 Seedless Watermelon Variety Trial: Total Yield, Marketable I and Marketable II Yields in
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS Emmalea Ernest & Gordon Johnson University of Delaware Research and Education Center 16483 County Seat Highway Georgetown, DE 19947 2015 2015 UNIVERSITY OF
Watermelon and Cantaloupe Variety Trials in Southwest Indiana Nov
Watermelon and Cantaloupe Variety Trials in Southwest Indiana 2017 Nov. 21 2017 Month Precipitation (inch) Weather Conditions Max temperature ( F) Min temperature ( F) Mean temperature ( F) Average 2017
RESEARCH REPORT - OREGON PROCESSED VEGETABLE COMMISSION. Control and Management of Common Smut on Corn in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington
RESEARCH REPORT - OREGON PROCESSED VEGETABLE COMMISSION Title: Control and Management of Common Smut on Corn in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington Project leaders: George H. Clough, Research Horticulturist,
Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary
Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, 2002 A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins Interpretative Summary Most of the SE sweet corn cultivars performed well in the trial. Excellent
Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015
Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015 Conducted by: Timothy Coolong PhD Department of Horticulture University of Georgia 2360 Rainwater Road Tifton, GA 31793 tcoolong@uga.edu Contents Table
Yield and Quality of Spring-Planted, Day-Neutral Strawberries in a High Tunnel
Yield and Quality of Spring-Planted, Day-Neutral Strawberries in a High Tunnel Kelly Gude, Sara Gragg, Cary Rivard, Eleni Pliakoni Great Plains Growers Conference, 217 Local Fruit Production in Kansas
Productivity and Characteristics of 23 Seedless Watermelon Cultivars at Three Missouri Locations in 2011 and 2012
Productivity and Characteristics of 23 Seedless Watermelon Cultivars at Three Missouri Locations in 2011 and 2012 Andrew L. Thomas 1, Catherine A. Bohnert 2, Nahshon A. Bishop 2, Steven Kirk 2, Sarah S.
Results and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe
Muskmelon Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2016 Wenjing Guan, Daniel S. Egel and Dennis Nowaskie Southwest Purdue Agricultural Center, Vincennes, IN, 47591 Introduction Indiana ranks fifth in 2015 in
Winter Barley Cultivar Trial Report: Caroline Wise, Masoud Hashemi and Talia Aronson
Winter Barley Cultivar Trial Report: 2015-2016 Caroline Wise, Masoud Hashemi and Talia Aronson Rational/Introduction: There is a wide variety of winter cultivars currently commercially available to growers
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS Emmalea Ernest and Gordon Johnson University of Delaware Carvel Research and Education Center 16483 County Seat Highway Georgetown, DE
Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015
Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015 Wenjing Guan, Daniel S. Egel, and Dennis Nowaskie Southwest Purdue Agriculture Center, Vincennes, IN, 47591 Introduction Cantaloupe is one of
Report to the Agricultural Research Foundation for Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission 2005
Report to the Agricultural Research Foundation for Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission 2005 Title: Cultivar Evaluation for Control of Common Smut in Sweet Corn and High Plains Virus in the Columbia Basin
Processing Tomato Cultivar Trials Research Report 1998
February 1999 RIDGETOWN COLLEGE Processing Tomato Cultivar Trials Research Report 1998 Steve Loewen Introduction This report summarizes the results of processing tomato variety trials conducted during
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN POMOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Abstract
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN POMOLOGICAL SOCIETY 58 Journal of the American Pomological Society 62(2):58-69 2008 The Kentucky Pawpaw Regional Variety Trial KIRK W. POMPER 1, SHERI B. CRABTREE 2, DESMOND R.
Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary
Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, 2000 Charles A. Mullins Interpretative Summary The pumpkin cultivars were highly productive, and fruit size was very large for most of the
Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board
Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board Keeping PA Vegetable Growers Profitable: Statewide Cultivar Trials Elsa Sánchez, Associate Professor of Horticultural Systems Management
Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary
Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, 2000 Charles A. Mullins Interpretative Summary Most cultivars performed reasonably well in the trial, and had widely varying
Report to the OSU Agricultural Research Foundation for the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission
88 Report to the OSU Agricultural Research Foundation for the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission Control and Management of Common Smut on Corn in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington George Clough,
PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT BELL PEPPER (Capsicum annuum L.) GENOTYPES IN RESPONSE TO SYNTHETIC HORMONES
Int. J. Sustain. Crop Prod. 2(5):78-84 (November 2007) PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT BELL PEPPER (Capsicum annuum L.) GENOTYPES IN RESPONSE TO SYNTHETIC HORMONES S.M. HASANUZZAMAN 1, S.M.M. HOSSAIN 2, M.O.
2006 New Mexico Farmer Silage Trials
2006 New Mexico Farmer Silage Trials Dr. Denise McWilliams, Extension Agronomist, New Mexico Cooperative Extension Service, Las Cruces, NM, demcwill@nmsu.edu, 505-646-3455, 12-4-06 New Mexico 2006 Corn
Pawpaw 101: Just the Basics
Pawpaw 101: Just the Basics Kirk W. Pomper, Ph.D. Principal Investigator of Horticulture/ Kentucky State University Adjunct Assistant Professor of Horticulture/ Univ. of Kentucky Introduction: What is
EVALUATION OF GRAPE AND CHERRY TOMATOES IN NORTHERN NEW JERSEY 2003
Appendix A.03 EVALUATION OF GRAPE AND CHERRY TOMATOES IN NORTHERN NEW JERSEY 2003 Peter Nitzsche, Morris County Agricultural Agent, RCE William Tietjen, Warren County Agricultural Agent, RCE Wesley Kline,
Trial Report: Yellow Squash and Zucchini Spring and Fall Variety Evaluation 2015
Trial Report: Yellow Squash and Zucchini Spring and Fall Variety Evaluation 2015 Conducted by: Timothy Coolong, PhD Department of Horticulture University of Georgia 2360 Rainwater Road Tifton, GA 31793
Relationships Between Descriptive Beef Flavor Attributes and Consumer Liking
NOVEL BEEF FLAVOR RESEARCH Relationships Between Descriptive Beef Flavor Attributes and Consumer Liking Rhonda K. Miller*, Chris R. Kerth, and Koushik Adhikari Rhonda Miller, Ph.D. 2471 TAMU Department
Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary.
Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, 2002 A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins Interpretative Summary The pumpkin cultivars were highly productive, but fruit size was less than
Determination of maturity and Genetic Diversity in Mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) Genotypes Based on Citrus Colour Index
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2017) 6(7): 577-586 International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 6 Number 7 (2017) pp. 577-586 Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com
The first three points mentioned above were investigated specifically.
Legume screening for cover crops: weed suppression, biomass development and nitrogen fixation Hans Ramseier, Professor for Plant Protection & Ecological Infrastructure; Bern University of Applied Sciences
Bell Pepper Cultivar Evaluation, 2017
Bell Pepper Cultivar Evaluation, 07 Chris Smigell, John Strang and John Snyder, University of Kentucky, Department of Horticulture, N-8 Ag Science Center North, Lexington, KY 06 jstrang@uky.edu Bell peppers
Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Cultivar Evaluation, New York 2007
Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Cultivar Evaluation, New York 2007 Margaret T. McGrath, Cornell University, Riverhead, NY 11901 George M. Fox, Cornell University, Riverhead, NY 11901 Sandra Menasha,
A comparison of bioactive compounds of strawberry fruit from Europe affected by genotype and latitude
Journal of Berry Research 2 (2012) 73 95 DOI:10.3233/JBR-2012-029 IOS Press A comparison of bioactive compounds of strawberry fruit from Europe affected by genotype and latitude 73 M. Josuttis a, C. Carlen
Powdery Mildew-resistant Melon Variety Evaluation, New York 2012
Powdery Mildew-resistant Melon Variety Evaluation, New York 2012 Margaret T. McGrath, Cornell University, Riverhead, New York Karen LaMarsh, Cornell University, Riverhead, New York Sandra Menasha, Cornell
Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri
Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri Steven Kirk, Catherin Bohnert, and David Johnson Lincoln University Cooperative Extension-Commercial Vegetable
Strawberry Variety Trial
Strawberry Variety Trial 2016-17 JAYESH SAMTANI ASSISTANT PROFESSOR AND SMALL FRUIT EXTENSION SPECIALIST HAMPTON ROADS AREC VIRGINIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Samtani, Copyright 2017 2013-14 growing season
Spring Red and Savoy Cabbage Variety Evaluation 2013
Spring Red and Savoy Cabbage Evaluation 2013 Chris Smigell, John Strang, Lucas Hanks, and John Snyder, Department of Horticulture; Pam Sigler, Program and Staff Development; and Elizabeth Buckner, Family
REPORT OF PROGRESS 751 Agricultural Experiment Station, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Marc A. Johnson, Director
REPRT F PRGRESS 751 Agricultural Experiment Station, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Marc A. Johnson, Director 1995 PRDUCTIN AND PSTHARVEST EVALUATIN F FRESH-CUT SUNFLWERS Karen L.B. Gast Department
Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008
Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008 Margaret T. McGrath, Cornell University, Riverhead, NY 11901 George M. Fox, Cornell University, Riverhead, NY 11901 Sandra
Genetic diversity of red and black upland rice accessions from East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia as revealed by agro-morphological characters
BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 18, Number 1, January 2017 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 197-211 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d180127 Genetic diversity of red and black upland rice accessions from East Nusa Tenggara,
PROCESSING TOMATO CULTIVAR TRIALS RESEARCH REPORT
PROCESSING TOMATO CULTIVAR TRIALS RESEARCH REPORT 1991 S.A. Loewen Ridgetown College of Agricultural Technology Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food 1 Table of Contents: Introduction... 3 Trial Entries...
ACORN AND SPECIALTY WINTER SQUASH VARIETY EVALUATION. Methods and Materials
ACORN AND SPECIALTY WINTER SQUASH VARIETY EVALUATION John Strang, April Satanek, John Snyder, Darrell Slone, Dave Lowry, Larry Blandford, Spencer Helsabeck and John Holden University of Kentucky, Lexington,
2016 High Tunnel Tomato Variety Trials
216 High Tunnel Tomato Variety Trials Kansas State University Horticulture Research and Extension Center Olathe, Kansas Kimberly Oxley, Research Associate Cary Rivard, Extension Specialist www.hightunnels.org
Title: Cultivar Evaluation for Control of Common Smut in Sweet Corn and High Plains Virus in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington.
Title: Cultivar Evaluation for Control of Common Smut in Sweet Corn and High Plains Virus in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington. Principle Investigators: George Clough and Philip Hamm, Hermiston
NASGA Strawberry Variety Evaluation Trials
NASGA 2018 Strawberry Variety Evaluation Trials JAYESH SAMTANI ASSISTANT PROFESSOR AND SMALL FRUIT EXTENSION SPECIALIST HAMPTON ROADS AREC VIRGINIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Copyright, Samtani 2018 2013-14
Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Variety Evaluation, New York, 2009
Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Variety Evaluation, New York, 2009 Margaret T. McGrath, Cornell University, Riverhead, NY 11901 George M. Fox, Cornell University, Riverhead, NY 11901 Sandra Menasha,
Report of Progress 961
Southwest Research Extension Center Report of Progress 96 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service K STATE Southwest Research-Extension Center efficacy
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS Emmalea Ernest & Gordon Johnson University of Delaware Research and Education Center 16483 County Seat Highway Georgetown, DE 19947 2017 2017 UNIVERSITY OF
The Pawpaw: Its Past, Present, and Future
The Pawpaw: Its Past, Present, and Future Kirk W. Pomper, Ph.D. Principal Investigator of Horticulture/ Kentucky State University Adjunct Associate Professor of Horticulture/ Univ. of Kentucky The North
Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C.
Performance of Pumpkin s, Highland Rim Experiment Station, 2000 Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C. Bost Interpretative Summary All pumpkin cultivars were fairly productive. Gold Rush,
Diversified Crops Report 13 Previously called Other Crops Report
Diversified Crops Report 13 Previously called Other Crops Report Index Words: vegetables, variety, onion, broccoli, cauliflower, lettuce from Experiment Station, HSPA March 1996 VEGETABLE VARIETY TRIALS
Muskmelon and Specialty Melon Variety Evaluations
Muskmelon and Specialty Melon Evaluations John Strang, Amy Poston, Chris Smigell, Darrell Slone, and John Snyder University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546 Forty-two melon varieties were evaluated in
2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results
2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results The following tables present the results of organic broccoli variety trials that took place on research stations and cooperating farms in Washington, Oregon,
WATERMELON AND CANTALOUPE VARIETY TRIALS, PO Box 8112, GSU Statesboro, GA
WATERMELON AND CANTALOUPE VARIETY TRIALS, 2004 George E. Boyhan 1, Darbie Granberry 2, Randy Hill 3, Thad Paulk 4 1 East Georgia Extension Center PO Box 8112, GSU Statesboro, GA 30460 gboyhan@uga.edu 2
Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan
Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan Dr. Ron Goldy and Virginia Wendzel Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center Benton Harbor, Michigan Objective
High Tunnel Crops. Shubin K. Saha D.P.M., Ph.D., Extension Vegetable Specialist Department of Horticulture University of Kentucky
High Tunnel Crops Shubin K. Saha D.P.M., Ph.D., Extension Vegetable Specialist Department of Horticulture University of Kentucky High Tunnel Crops Tomatoes #1 Specialty Cucumbers Colored Bell Peppers Lettuce
Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Ames Plantation, Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith. Interpretative Summary
Performance of Pumpkin s, Ames Plantation, 2001 Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith Interpretative Summary The pumpkin cultivars were highly productive and fruit size was very large
Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels
Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels Lewis W. Jett Commercial Vegetable Crops Specialist, West Virginia University, 2102 Agriculture Building, Morgantown, WV 26506 Introduction
Searching for Fresh Pack Alternatives Through Economic and Taste Evaluations of Tri-State Varieties. RR Spear, MJ Pavek, ZJ Holden
Searching for Fresh Pack Alternatives Through Economic and Taste Evaluatio of Tri-State Varieties RR Spear, MJ Pavek, ZJ Holden The Dominant Fresh Variety: Russet Norkotah Product of North Dakota State
Improving Efficacy of GA 3 to Increase Fruit Set and Yield of Clementine Mandarins in California
26 Annual Report Plant Management & Physiology Citrus Research Board Project Concluding: Summary Report Improving Efficacy of GA 3 to Increase Fruit Set and Yield of Clementine Mandarins in California
Vegetable. Variety Trials Fall Regional Bulletin 32. Auburn University
Vegetable Variety Trials Fall 2014 Regional Bulletin 32 Auburn University Department of Horticulture Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station November 2015 In cooperation with the Alabama Cooperative Extension
Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee
Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee Natto Natto soybeans are small (maximum of 5.5 mm diameter),
At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:
TITLE OF PROJECT: Processing standard sweet corn cultivar evaluations - Pillsbury 2006. NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY: J.W. Zandstra and R.C. Squire, University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown,
Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance
Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance Petrus Langenhoven, Ph.D. Horticulture and Hydroponics Crops Specialist February 13, 2018 1 Outline of Presentation Background Materials and Methods Results Conclusion
Investigation on Yield, Fruit Quality and Plant Characteristics of Some Local, European and American Strawberry Varieties and their Hybrids
ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER 175 Investigation on Yield, Fruit Quality and Plant Characteristics of Some Local, European and American Strawberry Varieties and their Hybrids Müge ÖZUYGUR 1 Sevgi PAYDAŞ KARGI
Lettuce Cultivar Observation Trial 2013
Purdue University Purdue e-pubs Purdue Fruit and Vegetable Research Reports Purdue Fruit and Vegetable Connection 2014 Lettuce Cultivar Observation Trial 2013 Elizabeth Maynard Purdue University - Main
Primocane Fruiting Blackberry Trial Results
Primocane Fruiting Blackberry Trial Results Kirk W. Pomper*, Jeremiah D. Lowe, and Sheri B. Crabtree Department of Plant and Soil Science, Kentucky State University John R. Clark Department of Horticulture,
ONION CULTIVAR TRIAL SEASON SUMMARY 2012
ONION CULTIVAR TRIAL SEASON SUMMARY 2012 The weather conditions for the month of April were favourable for a good start to the growing season. The ground frost was well melted by mid-april and soil temperatures
Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000
Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000 Brent Bean (806) 359-5401, b-bean@tamu.edu Calvin Trostle 1 (806) 746-4044, c-trostle@tamu.edu Matt Rowland,
CARROT CULTIVAR TRIAL SEASONAL SUMMARY
CARROT CULTIVAR TRIAL SEASONAL SUMMARY - 2008 Air temperatures for most of the summer months were slightly below seasonal to seasonal. Slightly drier conditions were present in May and June with good moisture
Tea clonal preference by Helopeltis theivora (Hemiptera: Miridae)
2017; 5(6): 97-103 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 JEZS 2017; 5(6): 97-103 2017 JEZS Received: 17-09-2017 Accepted: 18-10-2017 Purnima Das Assistant Professor, Department Surajit Kalita Assistant Professor,
Sowing Date Effect on Spring Safflower Cultivars
Sowing Date Effect on Spring Safflower Cultivars * Ali Reza Badri, 2 Amir Hossein Shirani Rad, 3 Saeed Seif Zadeh and 4 Zahra Bitarafan Department of Agronomy, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University,
Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station
ANNUAL REPORT TO NE-183 Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station November 2003 Duane W. Greene, Jon M. Clements, Daniel R. Cooley, Wesley R. Autio, and Arthur F. Tuttle PROGRESS AND PRINCIPLE ACCOMPLISHMENTS
2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County
2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County Richard H. Molinar and Michael Yang UC Cooperative Extension Fresno County A field research trial was established in a grower s field in August of 2005 to
Treatments protocol # Color Materials Timing FP/A Tol 1 W Untreated Y 2 OD Rovral 50WP
Cooperative Research Project, Doug Gubler, U.C. Davis Dept. of Plant Pathology Final report Trial name... Grape bunch rot fungicide trial, 00 Location... Valley Foothills Vineyard, Philo, Mendocino County,
Available online at
Available online at www.ijpab.com ISSN: 2320 7051 Int. J. Pure App. Biosci. 2 (1): 86-105 (2014) International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience Research Article Variability in the productivity of fruits
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS Emmalea Ernest & Gordon Johnson University of Delaware Research and Education Center 16483 County Seat Highway Georgetown, DE 19947 2018 2018 UNIVERSITY OF
Tomato Cultivar Evaluation in High Tunnels, Northern Indiana, 2017
Purdue University Purdue e-pubs Purdue Fruit and Vegetable Research Reports Purdue Fruit and Vegetable Connection 2018 Tomato Cultivar Evaluation in High Tunnels, Northern Indiana, 2017 Elizabeth Maynard
Final Report: Evaluation of fungicide programs for management of Botrytis bunch rot of grapes: 2017 field trials
Final Report: Evaluation of fungicide programs for management of Botrytis bunch rot of grapes: 2017 field trials Ara Avadisi Abramians and W. Douglas Gubler Department of Plant Pathology, University of
Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona
Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona Jay Subramani 1 and Shawna Loper 2 1 Maricopa Ag Center, University of Arizona 2 University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Pinal County Abstract Information
Assessment of Combining Ability Effects for Several Yield and Quality Traits in a Complete Diallel Cross of Strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch.
AcademicPres Available online: www.notulaebotanicae.ro Print ISSN 0255-965X; Electronic 1842-4309 Not Bot Horti Agrobo, 2017, 45(2):517-524. DOI:10.15835/nbha45210873 Original Article Notulae Botanicae
Materials and Methods
Objective OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY SEED LABORATORY SUMMIT SEED COATINGS- Caldwell ID Final Report April 2010 Effect of various seed coating treatments on viability and vigor of two blends of Kentucky bluegrass
AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF
AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Raymond Glen Shaffer for the degree of Master of Science in Horticulture presented on May 2, 2002. Title: The Effect of Rootstock on the Performance of the Vitis vinifera Cultivars
PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY
PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY - 2005 Stephen A. Garrison, 2 Thomas J. Orton, 3 Fred Waibel 4 and June F. Sudal 5 Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey 2 Northville Road, Bridgeton, NJ
Specialty Melon Replicated Variety Evaluation and Observation Trial Introduction Materials and Methods Results Crenshaw.
Specialty Melon Replicated Variety Evaluation and Observation Trial John Strang*, April Satanek, Katie Bale, John Snyder, and Chris Smigell Department of Horticulture, University of Kentucky Lexington,
Yield, Income, Quality, and Blotchy Ripening Susceptibility of Staked Tomato Cultivars in Central Kentucky
Yield, Income, Quality, and Blotchy Ripening Susceptibility of Staked Tomato Cultivars in Central Kentucky Brent Rowell, April Satanek, and John C. Snyder Department of Horticulture, University of Kentucky
2010 State Silage Corn Performance Test on the Texas High Plains
2010 State Silage Corn Performance Test on the Texas High Plains Wenwei Xu 1, Thomas Marek 2, Andy Cranmer 3, Bruce Carlson 3, Jonny Beck 4, Brent Bean 5, and Dennis Pietsch 6 Introduction Silage corn
Organic Seed Partnership
Organic Seed Partnership Early CMV Resistant Red Bell Peppers 2007 Replicated Trial Report OSP Pepper Trial Collaborators: Elizabeth Dyck (NOFA-NY), Dr. Barb Liedl (West Virginia State), Michael Glos,
Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona
Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona Shawna Loper 1 and Jay Subramani 2 1 University of Arizona of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Pinal County 2 Maricopa Ag Center, University of Arizona Abstract
2013 Watermelon Cultivar Trials
203 Watermelon Cultivar Trials Jonathan R. Schultheis W. Bradfred T hompson Department of Horticulture Science North Carolina State University Hort. Series No. 207 203 North Carolina Watermelon Cultivar
MISSISSIPPI SOYBEAN PROMOTION BOARD PROJECT NO (CONT) 2014 Annual Report
MISSISSIPPI SOYBEAN PROMOTION BOARD PROJECT NO. 19-2014 (CONT) 2014 Annual Report PROJECT TITLE: Evaluation of Private and Public Sobean Varieties and Breeding lines for Resistance to Stem Canker, Frogee