This is a repository copy of Poverty and Participation in Twenty-First Century Multicultural Britain.

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "This is a repository copy of Poverty and Participation in Twenty-First Century Multicultural Britain."

David Garrett
5 years ago
Views:

This is a repository copy of Poverty and Participation in Twenty-First Century Multicultural Britain. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.

(2017) Poverty and Participation in Twenty-First Century Multicultural Britain. Social Policy and Society, 16 (4). pp. 535-559. ISSN 1474-7464 https://doi.org/10.

1 This is a repository copy of Poverty and Participation in Twenty-First Century Multicultural Britain. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: Version: Supplemental Material Article: Ferragina, E., Tomlinson, M. orcid.org/ and Walker, R. (2017) Poverty and Participation in Twenty-First Century Multicultural Britain. Social Policy and Society, 16 (4). pp ISSN Cambridge University Press. This an author-produced version of the article which has been published in final form at Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by ing eprints@whiterose.ac.uk including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. eprints@whiterose.ac.uk

2 FIGURE AND TABLES Figure 1. SEM Model of Participation (All coefficients significant at 1% level) BILLS SAVINGS FINANCE FINANCIAL SITUATION PC DVD CD WASH DRYER DISHWASH FURNITURE HEATING REP HOUSE MATERIAL SITUATION HOUSING LACK OF DEPRIVATION HOLIDAY FRIENDS Bills BELONG FRIENDS N. ADVICE BORROW RECRE. ACTIVITY NEIGHBOUR. PARTICIPATION WILLING REMAIN SIMILAR TALK SOCIAL PARTICIPATION MEMBERSHIP PARTICIP. ASSOCIAT. PARTY POLITICS POLITICAL INTEREST SUPPORT GENERAL STRANGER TRUST RISKS Models Fit Number of Observations Test Chi-square Degrees of Freedom 395 CFI TLI RMSEA

3 Table 1. Items and Dimensions Loadings SEM Model of Participation Loadings Items Financial Situation Bills 0,61 (0,39) Savings 0,83 (0,17) Finance 0,72 (0,28) Material Situation PC 0,60 (0,40) DVD 0,60 (0,40) CD 0,62 (0,38) Wash 0,70 (0,30) Drier 0,49 (0,51) Dishwash 0,83 (0,17) Housing Furniture 0,96 (0,04) Heating Repair 0,62 (0,38) House 0,95 (0,05) Recreational Holiday 0,76 (0,24) Friends 0,39 (0,61) Neighbouring Belong 0,80 (0,20) Friends N. 0,86 (0,14) Advice 0,82 (0,18) Borrow 0,68 (0,32) Willing 0,58 (0,42) Remain 0,71 (0,29) Similar 0,76 (0,24) Talk 0,79 (0,21) Associationism Membership 0,99 (0,01) Participation 0,80 (0,20) Political Interest Party 0,85 (0,15) Politics 0,72 (0,28) Support 0,85 (0,15) Lack of Deprivation Financial Situation 0,98 (0,02) Material Situation 0,45 (0,55) Housing 0,94 (0,06) Recreational 0,92 (0,08) Social Participation Neighbouring 0,23 (0,77) Associationism 0,62 (0,38) Political Interest 0,43 (0,57) Trust General 0,51 (0,49) Stranger 0,82 (0,18) Risks 0,53 (0,47) Participation Deprivation 0,54 (0,46) Social Participation 0,96 (0,04) Trust 0,38 (0,62) Note: Measurement errors in brackets 2

4 Table 2. Correlation Matrix Latent Variables Finance Material Housing Recre. Neigh. Assoc. Politics Trust Lack of Finance 1 Material Housing Recreational Neighbouring Association Politics Trust Lack of Deprivation Soc. Part Participation Note: Recre.: Recreational, Depr.: Deprivation, Soc. Part.: Social Participation, Part.: Participation. Depr. Soc. Par. Part. 3

5 Figure 2 Effect of Income on Participation, Lack of Deprivation, Social Participation and Trust (Twentieths) 2a Participation Note: In the Figure we plotted the effect of income on participation excluding the top income vigintile and controlling for: Gender, Age group, Employment Status, Education, Social Class, Benefits, Household Type, Ethnicity and Region. 2b Lack of Deprivation Note: In the Figure we plotted the effect of income on lack of deprivation excluding the top income vigintile and controlling for: Gender, Age group, Employment Status, Education, Social Class, Benefits, Household Type, Ethnicity and Region. 4

6 2c Social Participation Note: In the Figure we plotted the effect of income on social participation excluding the top income vigintile and controlling for: Gender, Age group, Employment Status, Education, Social Class, Benefits, Household Type, Ethnicity and Region. 2d Trust Note: The Plotted coefficients for people in benefit are not statistically significant. In the Figure we plotted the effect of income on social participation excluding the top income vigintile and controlling for: Gender, Age group, Employment Status, Education, Social Class, Benefits, Household Type, Ethnicity and Region. 5

7 Figure 3 Effect of Covariates other than Income on Participation (T-Standardised) 3a Age In the figure we plotted the effect of age on participation excluding the age bracket 65 and older and controlling for: Income, Gender, Employment Status, Education, Social Class, Household Type, Ethnicity, and Region. 3b Employment Status Note: the black column indicates an insignificant coefficient. In the figure we plotted the effect of employment status on participation excluding Employed and controlling for: Income, Gender, Age Group, Education, Social Class, Household Type, Ethnicity, and Region. 3c Education In the figure we plotted the effect of education on participation excluding postgraduate and controlling for: Income, Gender, Age Group, Employment Status, Social Class, Household Type, Ethnicity, and Region. 6

8 3d Class Note: the black column indicates an insignificant coefficient. In the figure we plotted the effect of Class on participation excluding Larger Employers and Higher Management and controlling for: Income, Gender, Age Group, Employment Status, Education, Household Type, Ethnicity, and Region. 3e Household Type In the figure we plotted the effect of Family Type on participation excluding Couples without Children and controlling for: Income, Gender, Age Group, Employment Status, Education, Class, Ethnicity, and Region. 3f Region Note: the black column indicates an insignificant coefficient. In the figure we plotted the effect of Region on participation excluding Greater London and controlling for: Income, Gender, Age Group, Employment Status, Education, Class, Household Type, and Region. 7

9 3g Ethnicity In the figure we plotted the effect of Ethnicity on participation excluding White Group and controlling for: Income, Gender, Age Group, Employment Status, Education, Class, Household Type, and Region. Figure 4 Income 6th Vigintile by Ethnic Group in % of the Overall Sample 8

10 9

11 Appendix Tables Table 1A Dimensions of Participation and their Socio-Economic Correlates: Regression Coefficients Lack of Deprivation Social Participation Trust Participation Socio-Economic Characteristics B SE T Sig. B SE T Sig. B SE T Sig. B SE T Sig. Net Income (Top Vigintile Omitted) Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** Income *** *** ** *** Gender (Female Omitted) Male ns *** *** *** Age (More than 65 Omitted) *** *** ns *** *** *** ns *** ns *** ns *** Employment Status Self Employed ns *** *** *** Unemployed *** *** ns *** Retired *** *** ns *** Family ** ns ns ns Student *** *** *** *** Sick *** *** *** *** Other Status *** *** ns *** Education (Postgraduate Omitted) Lower Education *** *** *** *** GCSE and Equivalents *** *** *** *** A-Level and Equivalents *** *** *** *** Nursing, Teaching Qualifications *** *** *** *** First Degree Level *** ** *** ** NS-SEC Analytic Classes (Larger Employers and Higher Management) Higher Professional *** *** ns *** Lower Management and Professional *** *** *** *** Intermediate Occupations ns ns ns ns Small Employers and Own Account ns ns ns ns Lower Supervisory and Technical *** * ns * 10

12 Semi-routine Occupations *** *** *** *** Routine Occupations *** *** * *** Family Type (Couple without Children Omitted) Single Pensioner *** ** *** ** Couple Pensioner *** *** *** *** Single no Pension *** *** *** *** Lone Parent ns *** ns *** Couple Children *** *** ns *** Other Children *** *** ** *** Other no Children *** *** *** *** Ethnicity (White Omitted) Mixed Race *** ** * ** Indian ns *** *** *** Pakistani *** *** *** *** Bangladeshi *** *** *** *** Black Caribean *** *** *** *** Black African *** *** * *** Others *** *** ns *** Region (Greater London Omitted) North East * ns ns ns North West *** *** ns *** Yorkshire *** *** ns *** East Midlands *** ns ns * West Midlands *** ns ns ns East *** *** * *** South East *** *** *** *** South West *** *** *** *** Wales ns *** ns *** Scotland *** *** ns *** Northern Ireland *** *** ns *** Constant *** *** *** *** Number of Observations R

13 Table 2A Equivalised Net Household Income Demarcating Vigintiles White Mixed Indian Pakistani Bangladeshi Caribbean African Other Ethnic Minorities Overall Cases

14 Table 3A The correlation between income and participation by ethnic group (standardized coefficients). Different vigintiles are calculated for each ethnic group White Mixed Indian Pakistani Bangladeshi Caribbean African Ethnic Minorities Others Vigintiles Coeff. Sig. Coeff. Sig. Coeff. Sig. Coeff. Sig. Coeff. Sig. Coeff. Sig. Coeff. Sig. Coeff. Sig. Coeff. Sig, Net Income (Top vigintile omitted) Income *** *** *** *** ns *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** ** *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** ** *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** * *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** ** *** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** *** *** ** *** *** Income *** *** *** ***.019 ns ** ** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** * ** *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** ** ns *** *** *** Income *** *** *** *** *** ** *** *** *** Income *** *** ** * *** ns.032 ns *** *** Income *** *** *** ns ns ** ns *** ** Income *** * ns ns ns.011 ns.018 ns *** * Cases Rsquare

POVERTY AND PARTICIPATION IN 21 ST CENTURY BRITAIN. Emanuele Ferragina. Mark Tomlinson. Robert Walker. Notes & Documents

POVERTY AND PARTICIPATION IN 21 ST CENTURY BRITAIN Emanuele Ferragina Mark Tomlinson Robert Walker Notes & Documents n 2015-04 Juillet 2015 Résumé : Peter Townsend déclarait que la pauvreté pouvait être