Jenny Wong & DavidePettenella. WFP collection and consumption by Europeans households

Transcription

1 COST Action NWFP Ljubljana, 9 March 2017 Jenny Wong & DavidePettenella WFP collection and consumption by Europeans households in collaboration with: Marko Lovrić (main author) Enrico Vidale, Riccardo Da Re, Irina Prokofieva, Robert Mavsar Outline Introduction The sample Results NWFP picking in Europe HH consumption in Europe Final reflections 1

2 Introduction The methodology Purpose: Assess the consumption and collection of NWFPs in Europe Assess the share of pickers that sell their harvest Design: Panel study (distributed by a polling agency), household as unit of analysis at EU28 scale (no Malta, Luxembourg and Cyprus) with Serbia, Turkey and European part of Russian Federation Targeted parameters: 95% confidence level, 5% confidence interval on national level 2

3 The sample Sample: Respondents: (5% confidence level, 4.21% confidence interval on national level) Questions: Socio-economic (urban/rural, income, size of household) Consumption (14 products & how were they obtained) Collection (8 groups, 45 products consumption vs. sale, quantity, location & use) Other (forest ownership, frequency of picking, problems and income from picking) UNIT OF ANALYSIS IS HOUSEHOLD! Picking activity 3

4 HOW WERE NWFPS OBTAINED? (% of households) Purchased from a shop Purchased from a collector or a harvester Received as a gift Collected from wild by members of my household 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% PICKING OF NWFPs BY COUNTRY MEAN 24.5% 4

5 PICKING OF NWFPs (% of households) Wild Berries Wild Mushrooms Forest nuts Wild medicinal and aromatic plants Tree foliage, flowers, ferns, moss Sap or resin Truffles 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Where were these products picked? Urban area Other Agricultural land Forest 5

6 Leaves Where was foliage picked? Other Flowers Urban area Mosses Fresh branches Agricultural land Forest Dry branches Cones % households Acorns Where were nuts picked? Beechnuts Walnuts Pine-nuts Other Urban area Agricultural land Forest Chestnut % households who pick 6

7 Forest mushrooms Amanita caesarea Craterellus cornucopioides Morchella spp. Lactarius deliciosus Cantharellus lutescens Cantharellus cibarius Other Urban area Agricultural land Forest Boletus edulis gp % households who pick Forest berries Wild strawberries Cranberries Lingonberries Other Urban area Agricultural land Forest Bilberries % households who pick 7

8 Berries & fruit from everywhere! Tree fruit (Malus, Sorbus etc.) Rosehips Blackcurrant Elderberries Wild raspberries Other Urban area Agricultural land Forest Blackberries % households who pick Forest not so important for herbs? Wild thyme Wild asparagus Elderflower Angelica Dandelion Mint Stinging neetle Other Urban area Agricultural land Forest Wild garlic % households who pick 8

9 Who picks? Q: Is there difference in the collection of WFPs with respect to living in urban/rural environment? A: YES Living environment rural urban % pickers 34.94% 21.79% sign. Chi-squared 0 odds ratio (rural) 1.60 Q: Does household income affect consumption of WFPs? (Spearman s correlation between income and number of consumed products) A: SOMEWHAT (0.1299*) Q: Does household income affect collection of WFPs? (Spearman s correlation between income and number of collected products) A: NO ( ) WFP households consumption 9

10 CONSUMPTION BY COUNTRY MEAN 89.6% CONSUMPTION OF WFP IN 2015 (% of households) Fresh or dried nuts Fresh berries Dried, frozen, prepared wild berries Products based on natural extracts Fresh wild mushroom Dried, frozen, prepared wild mushroom Fresh wild plants Canned, juice, spirits or processed nuts Fresh, dry and non-handcrafted forest foliage and greenery Handcrafted forest foliage and greenery Fresh sap and raw resins Products based on sap and resins Frozen or prepared truffles Fresh truffles 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 10

11 Q: How much are WFPs sold/consumed? OTHER INFORMATION Tree foliage, flowers, ferns, moss Forest nuts Wild Mushrooms Truffles Wild Berries Wild medicinal and aromatic plants Sap or resin All consumed 75.7% 77.1% 85.2% 48.8% 89.0% 89.4% 74.3% 90% consumed 9.5% 5.3% 4.9% 18.3% 4.1% 3.8% 3.9% 75% consumed 6.0% 6.0% 4.3% 9.8% 2.6% 2.3% 10.1% 50% consumed 5.4% 5.8% 3.0% 9.6% 2.2% 2.0% 5.3% 25% consumed 1.6% 2.5% 1.4% 6.9% 0.9% 1.1% 1.8% 10% consumed 1.1% 1.7% 0.9% 7.7% 0.8% 0.9% 3.3% All sold 0.8% 1.6% 0.4% 5.4% 0.4% 0.6% 1.5% MORE SOLD THAN OTHERS Q: Did picking any of these products contribute to household net income in 2015 (monetary contribution)? A: (Percentage of households that pick) Not at All Very Little (0-10% of the household income) Somewhat (11-50% of the household income) To an important extent (more than 50% of the household income) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 11

12 CONSUMPTION OF WFPs (% of households) Wild Mushrooms TOTAL PERCENT OF HOUSEHOLDS: 18.83% Most frequent usage (for part which is not sold) Penny bun (Boletus edulis and group) Chanterelles (Cantharellus cibarius) Milk-cups (Lactarius deliciosus) Yellowfoot (Cantharellus lutescens) Morels (Morchella spp.) Caesar s mushroom (Amanita caesarea) Black trumpets (Craterellus cornucopioides) Freshly prepared Freshly prepared Freshly prepared Freshly prepared Freshly prepared Freshly prepared Freshly prepared 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% COLLECTION OF WFPs (% of households) Wild Berries TOTAL PERCENT OF HOUSEHOLDS: 20.06% Most frequent usage (for part which is not sold) Blackberries (Rubus fruticosus) Wild raspberries (Rubus idaeus) Bilberries (Blueberries, whinberries) (Vaccinium myrtillus) Wild strawberries (Fragaria vesca) Blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum) Rosehips (Rosa canina) Lingonberries (Vaccinium vitis-idaea) Elderberries (Sambucus nigra) Cranberries (Vaccinium oxycoccos) Tree fruit (Crab apple, wild service tree, Rowan ) Preserved (dried, made into jam etc.) Preserved (dried, made into jam etc.) 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 12

13 CONSUMPTION OF WFPs (% of households) Tree foliage, flowers, ferns, moss etc. (for decorative use) TOTAL PERCENT OF HOUSEHOLDS: 10.90% Most frequent usage (for part which is not sold) Flowers Used in fresh floral or green decorations Cones Used in fresh floral or green decorations Leaves Dried or processed into long lasting decorations Fresh branches Used in fresh floral or green decorations Dry branches Dried or processed into long lasting decorations Mosses Used in fresh floral or green decorations 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% Final reflections 13

14 Consumption of WFP: very high rates (89.6% of European HHs) A mass social activity: 24.5% of Eur HHs collecting WFP: the most relevant direct link with the forest for 0.5% of the EU population: more than 50% of income à a relevant economic for a small components of HHs, but an increasing importance for the cultural aspects of the forest Increasing WFP import from non-european countries à need for supporting the professional collection of WFP (income generation in rural areas) Many WFP are food: need for tracking = more transparent market à transparency = regular fiscal system à reform of legislation These are all relevant messages for the policy makers! 14