ASSESSING THE HEALTHFULNESS OF FOOD PURCHASES AMONG LOW-INCOME AREA SHOPPERS IN THE NORTHEAST
|
|
- Frederica Gilbert
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ASSESSING THE HEALTHFULNESS OF FOOD PURCHASES AMONG LOW-INCOME AREA SHOPPERS IN THE NORTHEAST ALESSANDRO BONANNO 1,2 *LAUREN CHENARIDES 2 RYAN LEE 3 1 Wageningen University, Netherlands 2 Penn State University 3 Johns Hopkins University Presented at the 2015 Joint NAREA/CAES Joint Annual Meeting June 28-30, 2015, Newport, Rhode Island
2 Acknowledgement Enhancing Food Security in the Northeast through Regional Food Systems (EFSNE) USDA Grant #
3 The EFSNE Project To assess whether greater reliance on regionally produced foods can improve food access for low-income communities, while also benefiting farmers, food supply chain firms, and others in the food system. System Approach Eleven institutions participate in six research teams: - Consumption - Distribution - Production - Education - Outreach - SceMo
4 The EFSNE Consumption team Goals: To assess current and potential community-level constraints and opportunities for improving access to regionally produced healthy food for people in low-income communities Activities: " Community focus groups " Survey of store characteristics " Brief individual shopper surveys " Secondary data analysis
5 Research Questions " What drivers affect the adoption of healthier market baskets among individuals in low-income areas in the Northeast U.S.? " What correlations exist between purchasing healthier market basket items and demographic characteristics? " How does availability of food stores impact healthy food purchasing?
6 Background: Access vs. Availability " Limited access to supermarkets and grocery stores in low-income areas hypothesized to be a barrier to consume healthy foods (Hilmers, Hilmers and Dave, 2012) " The most frequent barriers to healthy eating are time, taste, and financial considerations (Eikenberry and Smith, 2004; Kearney and McElhone, 1999) " Perceived supermarket access related to fruits and vegetables consumption distance to supermarket actual access (Caspi et al., 2012) " Sociodemographic factors affect purchasing of healthy foods more than the neighborhood environment (Lucan, Hillier, Schechter, & Glanz, 2014) " The nutritional quality of purchases made by low-income households respond very little when new stores enter (Handbury, Rahkovsky and Schnell, 2015)
7 Background: Market Basket Analyses Common in measuring availability and price of certain foods across stores and locations (Jetter & Cassady, 2006) Select foods based on a combination of factors including dietary guidelines, nutrition content, actual consumption patterns and price (Anderson et al., 2007). Use both fresh and processed items including frozen and canned fruits and vegetables (Anderson et al., 2007; Jetter & Cassady, 2006).
8 Data Surveys Collected October March 2015 (two waves) outside 15 stores in eight locations across the Northeast (N=1,501) Eligibility criteria: 18 years of age / primary food shopper in household Incentive: $5 gift cards to the store where the survey was conducted 25 questions including: " Perceived barriers to purchasing healthy foods " Perception of the food environment in the neighborhood " Market basket purchases for select items in the past 30 days " Demographic information Zip code Business Patterns (ZBP) Matched respondent zip code with 2013 ZBP data NAICS: " Grocery Stores (excludes convenience stores) " Convenience Stores " Warehouse Clubs and Supercenters
9 Summary Statistics All N=1,501 Program Participants n=711 Program Non- Participants n=790 Age Female 66.16% 70.04% 62.66% Persons in household Live in Rural Area 22.25% 16.46% 27.47% Participate in Government-Funded Program 47.37% Shopping Trip per Month Average Spent per Trip $94.65 $ $83.50 Shop at Farmers Markets 55.30% 51.05% 59.11%
10 Summary Statistics 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% Barriers to Purchasing Healthy Foods None Price Taste Unavailable Family Preferences Knowledge Time Other 0% All N=1,501 Program Participants n=711 Non-Program n=790
11 Data - EFSNE Market Basket Eight items food groups in the USDA s Thrifty Food Plan 1 At least one item for food group: meat, grain, dairy, fruit and vegetable. Items are categorized into conventional and healthier 2 Market Basket Items Conventional Variety Healthier Variety 3 Milk Whole Milk Skim or 1% Milk Bread White Bread Whole Wheat Bread Beef Regular Beef Lean Beef Apples n/a Apples Broccoli n/a Broccoli Cabbage n/a Cabbage 1 TFP (2006) includes an Other Foods category, however our survey does ask about products in this category 2 Survey responses allow for a don t know option for milk, bread, and beef 3 For purposes of this presentation we have excluded canned peaches and potatoes; results are available upon request
12 Milk n = 1, % 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% Whole Skim/1% 30% 20% 10% 0% All Program Participants Program Non- Participants
13 Bread n = 1, % 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% Other White Whole Wheat 30% 20% 10% 0% All Program Participants Non-Program
14 Beef n = % 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% Don t Know Regular Lean 30% 20% 10% 0% All Program Participants Non-Program
15 Apples n = 1, % 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% Not Purchased Purchased 30% 20% 10% 0% All Program Participants Non-Program
16 Broccoli n = 1, % 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% Not Purchased Purchased 30% 20% 10% 0% All Program Participants Non-Program
17 Cabbage n = 1, % 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% Not Purchased Purchased 30% 20% 10% 0% All Program Participants Non-Program
18 Empirical Approach Healthy Market Basket Indicator (HMBI) Where HMBI 6 = Healthy Basket Items / All Basket Items Such that Healthy Basket Items = FatFreeMilk+WheatBread +LeanBeef +Apples+Broccoli+Cabbage All Basket Items = Milk_Any+Bread_Any+Beef_Any +Apples +Broccoli+Cabbage Note: Each market basket item is reported as binary
19 Empirical Approach Healthy Market Basket Indicator (HMBI) Where HMBI 3 = Healthy Basket Items / All Basket Items Such that Healthy Basket Items = FatFreeMilk+WheatBread +LeanBeef +Apples+Broccoli+Cabbage All Basket Items = Milk_Any+Bread_Any+Beef_Any +Apples +Broccoli+Cabbage Note: Each market basket item is reported as binary
20 Estimation Define Healthy Market Basket Indicator (HMBI) as a function of: Demographics Shopping Habits Store Environment (ZBP Data) Gender (Female=1) Shopped during SNAP Period No. of Small Grocery (<20 ee's) Age Shopped on Weekend No. of Medium/Large Grocery (>20 ee's) Child (under age 5) Shopped at the End of the Month No. of Convenience Stores HH Size Monthly Shopping Frequency No. of Mass Merchandisers HH Size^2 Average Monthly Expenditure Years of Education Farmers Market Shopper Rural Participate in Govt. Subsidy Program Number of Barriers Cited Estimate 2 models: OLS and Tobit (lower bound 0; upper bound 100)
21 HMBI - 6 Products (milk, beef, bread, apples, cabbage, broccoli) Full NO Barr Price Price Barrier No Prog Part Progr Part Demographics Gender (Fem=1) 7.28*** 10.36*** *** 7.62*** (1.66) (2.11) (2.75) (2.24) (2.48) Age 0.32*** 0.29*** 0.35*** 0.26*** 0.42*** (0.06) (0.07) (0.09) (0.08) (0.08) Child (< 5) 2.21** (1.05) (1.41) (1.61) (1.87) (1.28) Education 1.29*** 1.48*** 1.05** 1.94*** 0.47 (0.33) (0.42) (0.51) (0.45) (0.48) Rural ** (2.19) (2.87) (3.46) (2.87) (3.41) Part in Govt.Prog * 2.59 (1.71) (2.26) (2.69) N of Barriers * 0.68 (0.90) (1.27) (1.28) Shopping Habits SNAP Period -3.49** * -7.63*** 1.39 (1.75) (2.31) (2.76) (2.47) (2.47) End of the Month *** 7.69** (2.25) (2.92) (3.60) (3.02) (3.37) FMs Shopper 1.00** 1.12* (0.50) (0.63) (0.86) (0.71) (0.72) Food Environment Small Groc 0.31*** 0.30*** 0.36*** 0.39*** 0.17 (0.09) (0.11) (0.14) (0.12) (0.14) Large Groc (0.44) (0.58) (0.68) (0.65) (0.59) Conv -0.97*** -0.77** -1.25*** *** (0.25) (0.32) (0.39) (0.37) (0.35) Mass Merch (2.83) (3.66) (4.48) (3.93) (4.08) Constant 27.62*** 26.80*** 28.75*** 25.13*** 27.81*** (6.71) (8.72) (10.55) (9.42) (9.01) N R
22 HMBI - 6 Products (milk, beef, bread, apples, cabbage, broccoli) Full NO Barr Price Price Barrier No Prog Part Progr Part Demographics Gender (Fem=1) 7.28*** 10.36*** *** 7.62*** (1.66) (2.11) (2.75) (2.24) (2.48) Age 0.32*** 0.29*** 0.35*** 0.26*** 0.42*** (0.06) (0.07) (0.09) (0.08) (0.08) Child (< 5) 2.21** (1.05) (1.41) (1.61) (1.87) (1.28) Education 1.29*** 1.48*** 1.05** 1.94*** 0.47 (0.33) (0.42) (0.51) (0.45) (0.48) Rural ** (2.19) (2.87) (3.46) (2.87) (3.41) Part in Govt.Prog * 2.59 (1.71) (2.26) (2.69) N of Barriers * 0.68 (0.90) (1.27) (1.28) Shopping Habits SNAP Period -3.49** * -7.63*** 1.39 (1.75) (2.31) (2.76) (2.47) (2.47) End of the Month *** 7.69** (2.25) (2.92) (3.60) (3.02) (3.37) FMs Shopper 1.00** 1.12* (0.50) (0.63) (0.86) (0.71) (0.72) Food Environment Small Groc 0.31*** 0.30*** 0.36*** 0.39*** 0.17 (0.09) (0.11) (0.14) (0.12) (0.14) Large Groc (0.44) (0.58) (0.68) (0.65) (0.59) Conv -0.97*** -0.77** -1.25*** *** (0.25) (0.32) (0.39) (0.37) (0.35) Mass Merch (2.83) (3.66) (4.48) (3.93) (4.08) Constant 27.62*** 26.80*** 28.75*** 25.13*** 27.81*** (6.71) (8.72) (10.55) (9.42) (9.01) N R
23 HMBI - 6 Products (milk, beef, bread, apples, cabbage, broccoli) Full NO Barr Price Price Barrier No Prog Part Progr Part Demographics Gender (Fem=1) 7.28*** 10.36*** *** 7.62*** (1.66) (2.11) (2.75) (2.24) (2.48) Age 0.32*** 0.29*** 0.35*** 0.26*** 0.42*** (0.06) (0.07) (0.09) (0.08) (0.08) Child (< 5) 2.21** (1.05) (1.41) (1.61) (1.87) (1.28) Education 1.29*** 1.48*** 1.05** 1.94*** 0.47 (0.33) (0.42) (0.51) (0.45) (0.48) Rural ** (2.19) (2.87) (3.46) (2.87) (3.41) Part in Govt.Prog * 2.59 (1.71) (2.26) (2.69) N of Barriers * 0.68 (0.90) (1.27) (1.28) Shopping Habits SNAP Period -3.49** * -7.63*** 1.39 (1.75) (2.31) (2.76) (2.47) (2.47) End of the Month *** 7.69** (2.25) (2.92) (3.60) (3.02) (3.37) FMs Shopper 1.00** 1.12* (0.50) (0.63) (0.86) (0.71) (0.72) Food Environment Small Groc 0.31*** 0.30*** 0.36*** 0.39*** 0.17 (0.09) (0.11) (0.14) (0.12) (0.14) Large Groc (0.44) (0.58) (0.68) (0.65) (0.59) Conv -0.97*** -0.77** -1.25*** *** (0.25) (0.32) (0.39) (0.37) (0.35) Mass Merch (2.83) (3.66) (4.48) (3.93) (4.08) Constant 27.62*** 26.80*** 28.75*** 25.13*** 27.81*** (6.71) (8.72) (10.55) (9.42) (9.01) N R
24 HMBI - 6 Products (milk, beef, bread, apples, cabbage, broccoli) Full NO Barr Price Price Barrier No Prog Part Progr Part Demographics Gender (Fem=1) 7.28*** 10.36*** *** 7.62*** (1.66) (2.11) (2.75) (2.24) (2.48) Age 0.32*** 0.29*** 0.35*** 0.26*** 0.42*** (0.06) (0.07) (0.09) (0.08) (0.08) Child (< 5) 2.21** (1.05) (1.41) (1.61) (1.87) (1.28) Education 1.29*** 1.48*** 1.05** 1.94*** 0.47 (0.33) (0.42) (0.51) (0.45) (0.48) Rural ** (2.19) (2.87) (3.46) (2.87) (3.41) Part in Govt.Prog * 2.59 (1.71) (2.26) (2.69) N of Barriers * 0.68 (0.90) (1.27) (1.28) Shopping Habits SNAP Period -3.49** * -7.63*** 1.39 (1.75) (2.31) (2.76) (2.47) (2.47) End of the Month *** 7.69** (2.25) (2.92) (3.60) (3.02) (3.37) FMs Shopper 1.00** 1.12* (0.50) (0.63) (0.86) (0.71) (0.72) Food Environment Small Groc 0.31*** 0.30*** 0.36*** 0.39*** 0.17 (0.09) (0.11) (0.14) (0.12) (0.14) Large Groc (0.44) (0.58) (0.68) (0.65) (0.59) Conv -0.97*** -0.77** -1.25*** *** (0.25) (0.32) (0.39) (0.37) (0.35) Mass Merch (2.83) (3.66) (4.48) (3.93) (4.08) Constant 27.62*** 26.80*** 28.75*** 25.13*** 27.81*** (6.71) (8.72) (10.55) (9.42) (9.01) N R
25 HMBI - 3 Products (milk, beef, bread, apples, cabbage, broccoli) Full NO Barr Price Price Barrier No Prog Part Progr Part Demographics Gender (Fem=1) 5.50** 6.23** * 7.20** (2.14) (2.77) (3.46) (2.97) (3.12) Age 0.26*** 0.19** 0.35*** 0.17* 0.39*** (0.07) (0.09) (0.11) (0.10) (0.10) Child (< 5) 2.35* (1.35) (1.85) (2.02) (2.48) (1.60) Education 1.17*** 1.05* 1.33** 1.56*** 0.66 (0.42) (0.56) (0.64) (0.59) (0.60) Rural 5.06* ** 8.81** 0.63 (2.81) (3.77) (4.34) (3.80) (4.28) Part in Govt.Prog -4.23* -5.92** (2.21) (2.97) (3.38) N of Barriers ** 0.53 (1.16) (1.68) (1.61) Shopping Habits SNAP Period * 0.74 (2.25) (3.04) (3.47) (3.27) (3.10) End of the Month * (2.89) (3.84) (4.53) (4.00) (4.24) FMs Shopper 1.69*** 2.12** ** 0.96 (0.65) (0.82) (1.09) (0.94) (0.90) Food Environment Small Groc 0.34*** *** 0.49*** 0.07 (0.11) (0.15) (0.17) (0.15) (0.17) Large Groc (0.56) (0.77) (0.85) (0.86) (0.74) Conv -1.45*** -1.05** -2.02*** -0.91* -1.71*** (0.32) (0.43) (0.50) (0.49) (0.44) Mass Merch * (3.64) (4.82) (5.63) (5.20) (5.12) Constant 18.84** 24.10** (8.63) (11.47) (13.27) (12.49) (11.32) N R
26 HMBI - 3 Products (milk, beef, bread, apples, cabbage, broccoli) Full NO Barr Price Price Barrier No Prog Part Progr Part Demographics Gender (Fem=1) 5.50** 6.23** * 7.20** (2.14) (2.77) (3.46) (2.97) (3.12) Age 0.26*** 0.19** 0.35*** 0.17* 0.39*** (0.07) (0.09) (0.11) (0.10) (0.10) Child (< 5) 2.35* (1.35) (1.85) (2.02) (2.48) (1.60) Education 1.17*** 1.05* 1.33** 1.56*** 0.66 (0.42) (0.56) (0.64) (0.59) (0.60) Rural 5.06* ** 8.81** 0.63 (2.81) (3.77) (4.34) (3.80) (4.28) Part in Govt.Prog -4.23* -5.92** (2.21) (2.97) (3.38) N of Barriers ** 0.53 (1.16) (1.68) (1.61) Shopping Habits SNAP Period * 0.74 (2.25) (3.04) (3.47) (3.27) (3.10) End of the Month * (2.89) (3.84) (4.53) (4.00) (4.24) FMs Shopper 1.69*** 2.12** ** 0.96 (0.65) (0.82) (1.09) (0.94) (0.90) Food Environment Small Groc 0.34*** *** 0.49*** 0.07 (0.11) (0.15) (0.17) (0.15) (0.17) Large Groc (0.56) (0.77) (0.85) (0.86) (0.74) Conv -1.45*** -1.05** -2.02*** -0.91* -1.71*** (0.32) (0.43) (0.50) (0.49) (0.44) Mass Merch * (3.64) (4.82) (5.63) (5.20) (5.12) Constant 18.84** 24.10** (8.63) (11.47) (13.27) (12.49) (11.32) N R
27 HMBI - 3 Products (milk, beef, bread, apples, cabbage, broccoli) Full NO Barr Price Price Barrier No Prog Part Progr Part Demographics Gender (Fem=1) 5.50** 6.23** * 7.20** (2.14) (2.77) (3.46) (2.97) (3.12) Age 0.26*** 0.19** 0.35*** 0.17* 0.39*** (0.07) (0.09) (0.11) (0.10) (0.10) Child (< 5) 2.35* (1.35) (1.85) (2.02) (2.48) (1.60) Education 1.17*** 1.05* 1.33** 1.56*** 0.66 (0.42) (0.56) (0.64) (0.59) (0.60) Rural 5.06* ** 8.81** 0.63 (2.81) (3.77) (4.34) (3.80) (4.28) Part in Govt.Prog -4.23* -5.92** (2.21) (2.97) (3.38) N of Barriers ** 0.53 (1.16) (1.68) (1.61) Shopping Habits SNAP Period * 0.74 (2.25) (3.04) (3.47) (3.27) (3.10) End of the Month * (2.89) (3.84) (4.53) (4.00) (4.24) FMs Shopper 1.69*** 2.12** ** 0.96 (0.65) (0.82) (1.09) (0.94) (0.90) Food Environment Small Groc 0.34*** *** 0.49*** 0.07 (0.11) (0.15) (0.17) (0.15) (0.17) Large Groc (0.56) (0.77) (0.85) (0.86) (0.74) Conv -1.45*** -1.05** -2.02*** -0.91* -1.71*** (0.32) (0.43) (0.50) (0.49) (0.44) Mass Merch * (3.64) (4.82) (5.63) (5.20) (5.12) Constant 18.84** 24.10** (8.63) (11.47) (13.27) (12.49) (11.32) N R
28 HMBI - 3 Products (milk, beef, bread, apples, cabbage, broccoli) Full NO Barr Price Price Barrier No Prog Part Progr Part Demographics Gender (Fem=1) 5.50** 6.23** * 7.20** (2.14) (2.77) (3.46) (2.97) (3.12) Age 0.26*** 0.19** 0.35*** 0.17* 0.39*** (0.07) (0.09) (0.11) (0.10) (0.10) Child (< 5) 2.35* (1.35) (1.85) (2.02) (2.48) (1.60) Education 1.17*** 1.05* 1.33** 1.56*** 0.66 (0.42) (0.56) (0.64) (0.59) (0.60) Rural 5.06* ** 8.81** 0.63 (2.81) (3.77) (4.34) (3.80) (4.28) Part in Govt.Prog -4.23* -5.92** (2.21) (2.97) (3.38) N of Barriers ** 0.53 (1.16) (1.68) (1.61) Shopping Habits SNAP Period * 0.74 (2.25) (3.04) (3.47) (3.27) (3.10) End of the Month * (2.89) (3.84) (4.53) (4.00) (4.24) FMs Shopper 1.69*** 2.12** ** 0.96 (0.65) (0.82) (1.09) (0.94) (0.90) Food Environment Small Groc 0.34*** *** 0.49*** 0.07 (0.11) (0.15) (0.17) (0.15) (0.17) Large Groc (0.56) (0.77) (0.85) (0.86) (0.74) Conv -1.45*** -1.05** -2.02*** -0.91* -1.71*** (0.32) (0.43) (0.50) (0.49) (0.44) Mass Merch * (3.64) (4.82) (5.63) (5.20) (5.12) Constant 18.84** 24.10** (8.63) (11.47) (13.27) (12.49) (11.32) N R
29 Discussion " Higher HMBI shares are attributed to older, educated women (however sample selection may exist); presence of children only limited effect on HMBI. " Frequenting farmers market seems related to higher HMBIs " Perceived barriers to acquire healthy food is related to lower HMBI only for shoppers who do not participate in assistance programs " The food environment plays an important role: " Presence of small grocery stores (convenience stores) has a consistently positive (negative) effect on HMBI scores " Some (limited) evidence that mass merchandisers and HMBI3 are inversely correlated.
30 Limitations " Dataset incomplete - more surveys still coming in " Sample selection bias may be present " Only 6 (3) food products considered HMBI rough proxy for healthy eating " The dependent variable is a proportion, however logistic transformation not possible categorical estimation more appropriate? " Measures of the actual food environment captures only presence of stores, not assortment, proximity etc...
31 Thank you! Questions and feedback are welcome
32 HMBI - 6 Products (milk, beef, bread, apples, cabbage, broccoli) Full NO Barr Price Price Barrier No Prog Part Progr Part OLS Tobit OLS Tobit OLS Tobit OLS Tobit OLS Tobit Demographics Gender (Fem=1) 7.28*** 7.46*** 10.36*** 10.61*** *** 7.59*** 7.62*** 7.80*** (1.66) (1.81) (2.11) (2.33) (2.75) (2.94) (2.24) (2.43) (2.48) (2.66) Age 0.32*** 0.32*** 0.29*** 0.29*** 0.35*** 0.35*** 0.26*** 0.25*** 0.42*** 0.46*** (0.06) (0.06) (0.07) (0.08) (0.09) (0.10) (0.08) (0.09) (0.08) (0.09) Child (< 5) 2.21** 2.19** (1.05) (1.03) (1.41) (1.49) (1.61) (1.47) (1.87) (1.82) (1.28) (1.27) Education 1.29*** 1.55*** 1.48*** 1.79*** 1.05** 1.28** 1.94*** 2.26*** (0.33) (0.39) (0.42) (0.51) (0.51) (0.62) (0.45) (0.54) (0.48) (0.55) Rural ** 8.16** (2.19) (2.35) (2.87) (3.09) (3.46) (3.61) (2.87) (3.12) (3.41) (3.54) Part in Govt.Prog * -4.46* (1.71) (1.87) (2.26) (2.38) (2.69) (3.02) N of Barriers * -2.73** (0.90) (0.94) (1.27) (1.36) (1.28) (1.22) Shopping Habits SNAP Period -3.49** -4.41** * -6.69** -7.63*** -9.10*** (1.75) (1.91) (2.31) (2.53) (2.76) (2.97) (2.47) (2.70) (2.47) (2.69) End of the Month *** -8.92*** 7.69** 8.98** (2.25) (2.45) (2.92) (3.08) (3.60) (4.19) (3.02) (3.28) (3.37) (3.59) FMs Shopper 1.00** 1.11*** 1.12* 1.17** * ** (0.50) (0.42) (0.63) (0.56) (0.86) (0.67) (0.71) (0.51) (0.72) (0.70) Food Environment Small Groc 0.31*** 0.38*** 0.30*** 0.36** 0.36*** 0.44*** 0.39*** 0.46*** (0.09) (0.11) (0.11) (0.14) (0.14) (0.17) (0.12) (0.14) (0.14) (0.17) Large Groc (0.44) (0.44) (0.58) (0.57) (0.68) (0.74) (0.65) (0.65) (0.59) (0.61) Conv -0.97*** -0.99*** -0.77** -0.81** -1.25*** -1.26*** *** -1.52*** (0.25) (0.27) (0.32) (0.35) (0.39) (0.44) (0.37) (0.39) (0.35) (0.38) Mass Merch (2.83) (3.12) (3.66) (3.79) (4.48) (5.47) (3.93) (4.37) (4.08) (4.17) Constant 27.62*** 26.80*** 28.75*** 25.13*** 27.81*** (6.71) (8.72) (10.55) (9.42) (9.01) N R
33 HMBI - 3 Products (milk, beef, bread, apples, cabbage, broccoli) Full NO Barr Price Price Barrier No Prog Part Progr Part OLS Tobit OLS Tobit OLS Tobit OLS Tobit OLS Tobit Demographics Gender (Fem=1) 5.50** 6.15*** 6.23** 6.96** * ** 8.52** (2.14) (2.35) (2.77) (3.03) (3.46) (3.84) (2.97) (3.22) (3.12) (3.44) Age 0.26*** 0.29*** 0.19** 0.20* 0.35*** 0.41*** 0.17* 0.19* 0.39*** 0.43*** (0.07) (0.08) (0.09) (0.10) (0.11) (0.13) (0.10) (0.11) (0.10) (0.11) Child (< 5) 2.35* 2.39* (1.35) (1.41) (1.85) (2.04) (2.02) (1.89) (2.48) (2.65) (1.60) (1.66) Education 1.17*** 1.18** 1.05* ** 1.39* 1.56*** 1.51** (0.42) (0.48) (0.56) (0.66) (0.64) (0.72) (0.59) (0.70) (0.60) (0.65) Rural 5.06* ** 8.60* 8.81** 8.67** (2.81) (3.07) (3.77) (4.08) (4.34) (4.75) (3.80) (4.14) (4.28) (4.61) Part in Govt.Prog -4.23* -4.60* -5.92** -6.86** (2.21) (2.36) (2.97) (3.10) (3.38) (3.75) N of Barriers * -3.34** -4.35** (1.16) (1.29) (1.68) (1.89) (1.61) (1.67) Shopping Habits SNAP Period * -6.77* (2.25) (2.44) (3.04) (3.30) (3.47) (3.77) (3.27) (3.56) (3.10) (3.32) End of the Month * 9.01* (2.89) (3.16) (3.84) (4.00) (4.53) (5.33) (4.00) (4.28) (4.24) (4.62) FMs Shopper 1.69*** 1.53** 2.12** 2.03** ** 2.11*** (0.65) (0.61) (0.82) (0.83) (1.09) (0.97) (0.94) (0.78) (0.90) (0.92) Food Environment Small Groc 0.34*** 0.36*** *** 0.51*** 0.49*** 0.54*** (0.11) (0.14) (0.15) (0.19) (0.17) (0.20) (0.15) (0.18) (0.17) (0.22) Large Groc (0.56) (0.59) (0.77) (0.78) (0.85) (0.95) (0.86) (0.87) (0.74) (0.79) Conv -1.45*** -1.61*** -1.05** -1.19** -2.02*** -2.25*** -0.91* -0.96* -1.71*** -1.95*** (0.32) (0.36) (0.43) (0.47) (0.50) (0.56) (0.49) (0.54) (0.44) (0.50) Mass Merch * -9.17* (3.64) (4.31) (4.82) (5.34) (5.63) (7.05) (5.20) (6.35) (5.12) (5.92) Constant 18.84** 24.10** (8.63) (11.47) (13.27) (12.49) (11.32) N R
Dietary Diversity in Urban and Rural China: An Endogenous Variety Approach
Dietary Diversity in Urban and Rural China: An Endogenous Variety Approach Jing Liu September 6, 2011 Road Map What is endogenous variety? Why is it? A structural framework illustrating this idea An application
More informationAIC Issues Brief. The Availability and Cost of Healthier Food Items Karen M. Jetter and Diana L. Cassady 1. Agricultural Issues Center
University of California Number 29 March 2005 Agricultural Issues Center AIC Issues Brief The Availability and Cost of Healthier Food Items Karen M. Jetter and Diana L. Cassady 1 This study examines the
More information1) What proportion of the districts has written policies regarding vending or a la carte foods?
Rhode Island School Nutrition Environment Evaluation: Vending and a La Carte Food Policies Rhode Island Department of Education ETR Associates - Education Training Research Executive Summary Since 2001,
More informationChicken Usage Summary
http://www.nationalchickencouncil.org Chicken Usage Summary July 2014 Presentation prepared for: National Chicken Council Prepared by: PKS Research Partners Funding provided by: Background PKS Research
More informationAccess to Affordable and Nutritious Food: Measuring and Understanding Food Deserts and Their Consequences
Access to Affordable and Nutritious Food: Measuring and Understanding Food Deserts and Their Consequences Shelly Ver Ploeg Economic Research Service, USDA Workshop on Farm and Food Policy and Obesity UC-Davis
More informationTiming is Everything: The Role of Time in Fast-food and Sit-down Restaurant Behavior
Timing is Everything: The Role of Time in Fast-food and Sit-down Restaurant Behavior Karen S. Hamrick Abigail M. Okrent Perspectives on Time Use in the U.S. Conference June 23-24, 2014, Washington, DC
More informationMultiple Imputation for Missing Data in KLoSA
Multiple Imputation for Missing Data in KLoSA Juwon Song Korea University and UCLA Contents 1. Missing Data and Missing Data Mechanisms 2. Imputation 3. Missing Data and Multiple Imputation in Baseline
More informationHow to Implement Summer Food Standards of Excellence in Your Community
How to Implement Summer Food Standards of Excellence in Your Community As an anti-hunger advocate, you understand the clear link between the food served at summer food sites and participation rates. Simply
More informationCharacteristics of Wine Consumers in the Mid-Atlantic States: A Statistical Analysis
Characteristics of Wine Consumers in the Mid-Atlantic States: A Statistical Analysis Kathy Kelley, Professor, Penn State Abigail Miller, Former Graduate Student, Penn State Denise Gardner, Enology Extension
More informationComparative Analysis of Fresh and Dried Fish Consumption in Ondo State, Nigeria
Comparative Analysis of Fresh and Dried Fish Consumption in Ondo State, Nigeria Mafimisebi, T.E. (Ph.D) Department of Agricultural Business Management School of Agriculture & Natural Resources Mulungushi
More informationNew from Packaged Facts!
New from Packaged Facts! FOODSERVICE MARKET INSIGHTS A fresh perspective on the foodservice marketplace Essential Insights on Consumer customerservice@packagedfacts.com (800) 298-5294 (240) 747-3095 (Intl.)
More informationAvailability of Healthy Food in Corner Stores in Hartford, CT
Availability of Healthy Food in Corner Stores in Hartford, CT Katie S. Martin, PhD University of Connecticut Center for Public Health & Health Policy Lack of Access to Healthy Food Healthy, affordable
More informationTo make wine, to sell the grapes or to deliver them to a cooperative: determinants of the allocation of the grapes
American Association of Wine Economists (AAWE) 10 th Annual Conference Bordeaux June 21-25, 2016 To make wine, to sell the grapes or to deliver them to a cooperative: determinants of the allocation of
More informationThe Grocer : Soft Drinks Research on behalf of The Grocer April 2018
The Grocer : Soft Drinks Research on behalf of The Grocer April 2018 Lucia Juliano Head of CPG & Retail Research +44 (0) 161 242 1371 ljuliano@harrisinteractive.co.uk 1 Over 7 out of 10 (72%) respondents
More informationAwareness, Attitude & Usage Study Executive Summary
Awareness, Attitude & Usage Study Executive Summary 8.4.11 Background The National Pecan Shellers Association (NPSA) is interested in encouraging the consumption of Pecans, particularly increasing the
More informationAvailability of Healthy Snacks in Stores Near Low-Income Urban, High-Income Urban, and Rural Elementary/Middle Schools
Nancy Findholt, PhD, RN Associate Professor, OHSU Hayley Pickus, BA Portland State University Availability of Healthy Snacks in Stores Near Low-Income Urban, High-Income Urban, and Rural Elementary/Middle
More informationAn update from the Competitiveness and Market Analysis Branch, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry.
An update from the Competitiveness and Market Analysis Branch, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry. The articles in this series includes information on what consumers are buying and why they are buying it.
More informationProduce Education Program 2015 Evaluation Report Comparison of Key Findings
California Association of Food Banks Produce Education Program 2015 Evaluation Report Comparison of Key Findings Data Collection The CAFB FY 15 evaluation plan called for the collection of 200 surveys
More informationEmerging Local Food Systems in the Caribbean and Southern USA July 6, 2014
Consumers attitudes toward consumption of two different types of juice beverages based on country of origin (local vs. imported) Presented at Emerging Local Food Systems in the Caribbean and Southern USA
More informationProblem. Background & Significance 6/29/ _3_88B 1 CHD KNOWLEDGE & RISK FACTORS AMONG FILIPINO-AMERICANS CONNECTED TO PRIMARY CARE SERVICES
CHD KNOWLEDGE & RISK FACTORS AMONG FILIPINO-AMERICANS CONNECTED TO PRIMARY CARE SERVICES Background & Significance Who are the Filipino- Americans? Alona D. Angosta, PhD, APN, FNP, NP-C Assistant Professor
More informationSportzfun.com. Source: Joseph Pine and James Gilmore, The Experience Economy, Harvard Business School Press.
National Extension Tourism Conference Park City, Utah Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development June 15 th, 2009 or Agribusin siness and Econ onomic Deve Center fo velopment What does Agritourism
More informationImplement Summer Food Standards of Excellence in Your Community
Implement Summer Food Standards of Excellence in Your Community As an anti-hunger advocate, you understand the clear link between the food served at summer food sites and participation rates. Simply put,
More informationCandy/Snack Innovation Forum. February 21, 2006
Candy/Snack Innovation Forum February 21, 2006 Welcome To The Candy/Snack Forum Facilitators Debbie Wildrick Product Director- Packaged Goods 7-Eleven, Inc. Bill Dusek Managing Director Dechert-Hampe &
More informationShopping behaviours of different food and drinks consumption groups 35% 27% 16%
In Fact research facts from the HSC Shopping behaviours of different food and drinks consumption groups Background The cost of healthier foods is thought to be a barrier to healthy eating, but recent research
More informationDescribing U.S. Households Food Purchasing Patterns across Poverty and Urban Status: The EFSNE project Market Basket
Describing U.S. Households Food Purchasing Patterns across Poverty and Urban Status: The EFSNE project Market Basket by Rebecca Cleary, Alessandro Bonanno and Clare Cho February 2017 Rural Development
More informationRESEARCH UPDATE from Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute by Natalia Kolyesnikova, PhD Tim Dodd, PhD THANK YOU SPONSORS
RESEARCH UPDATE from by Natalia Kolyesnikova, PhD Tim Dodd, PhD THANK YOU SPONSORS STUDY 1 Identifying the Characteristics & Behavior of Consumer Segments in Texas Introduction Some wine industries depend
More informationFood Policy, Economics and Obesity Prevention
Food Policy, Economics and Obesity Prevention Lisa M. Powell, Ph.D. Institute for Health Policy and Research University of Illinois at Chicago National Cancer Institute Eighth Annual Cancer Prevention
More informationA Comparison of X, Y, and Boomer Generation Wine Consumers in California
A Comparison of,, and Boomer Generation Wine Consumers in California Marianne McGarry Wolf, Scott Carpenter, and Eivis Qenani-Petrela This research shows that the wine market in the California is segmented
More informationDebt and Debt Management among Older Adults
Debt and Debt Management among Older Adults Annamaria Lusardi and Olivia S. Mitchell Consumption and Finance Conference Julis-Rabinowitz Center for Public Policy and Finance February 20, 2014 Research
More informationHealthy Food Access Policy JOHN WEIDMAN THE FOOD TRUST
Healthy Food Access Policy JOHN WEIDMAN THE FOOD TRUST Making the Case Making the Case for Healthy Food Access The Grocery Gap: Who Has Access to Healthy Food and Why It Matters Authors: The Food Trust
More informationTHE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BEER TOURISM IN KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BEER TOURISM IN KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN Dan Giedeman, Ph.D., Paul Isely, Ph.D., and Gerry Simons, Ph.D. 10/8/2015 THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BEER TOURISM IN KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN EXECUTIVE
More informationRunning Head: MESSAGE ON A BOTTLE: THE WINE LABEL S INFLUENCE p. 1. Message on a bottle: the wine label s influence. Stephanie Marchant
Running Head: MESSAGE ON A BOTTLE: THE WINE LABEL S INFLUENCE p. 1 Message on a bottle: the wine label s influence Stephanie Marchant West Virginia University Running Head: MESSAGE ON A BOTTLE: THE WINE
More informationConsumer study on fruit - In depth interviews -
FOCUS-BALKANS Consumer study on fruit - In depth interviews - Galjina Ognjanov, PhD Jelena Filipovic, MSc 1 Survey on fruit consumption in Serbia The survey period: October-November 2009 Total: 30 participants
More informationUS Chicken Consumption. Presentation to Chicken Marketing Summit July 18, 2017 Asheville, NC
US Chicken Consumption Presentation to Chicken Marketing Summit July 18, 2017 Asheville, NC Primary research sponsor Contributing research sponsors Research findings presented by OBJECTIVES Analyze chicken
More informationHispanic Population by Region
Hispanic Marketing Hispanic Population Largest ethnic group in the U.S., at 50.5 million consumers and growing 16% of the total population Those of Cuban, Mexican, Puerto Rican, South or Central American,
More informationPanel A: Treated firm matched to one control firm. t + 1 t + 2 t + 3 Total CFO Compensation 5.03% 0.84% 10.27% [0.384] [0.892] [0.
Online Appendix 1 Table O1: Determinants of CMO Compensation: Selection based on both number of other firms in industry that have CMOs and number of other firms in industry with MBA educated executives
More informationReputation Tapping: Examining Consumer Response to Wine Appellation Information
Reputation Tapping: Examining Consumer Response to Wine Appellation Information Brad Rickard, Assistant Professor Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University Presented
More informationThe Role of Calorie Content, Menu Items, and Health Beliefs on the School Lunch Perceived Health Rating
The Role of Calorie Content, Menu Items, and Health Beliefs on the School Lunch Perceived Health Rating Matthew V. Pham Landmark College matthewpham@landmark.edu Brian E. Roe The Ohio State University
More informationTOTAL STORE CONNECTIVITY: REVEALING NEW PATHWAYS TO WIN SPECIALTY CHEESE
TOTAL STORE CONNECTIVITY: REVEALING NEW PATHWAYS TO WIN SPECIALTY CHEESE International Dairy Deli Bakery Association In partnership with Nielsen Perishables Group May, 2015 AGENDA Study Objectives 3 Deli
More informationA Web Survey Analysis of the Subjective Well-being of Spanish Workers
A Web Survey Analysis of the Subjective Well-being of Spanish Workers Martin Guzi Masaryk University Pablo de Pedraza Universidad de Salamanca APPLIED ECONOMICS MEETING 2014 Frey and Stutzer (2010) state
More informationLabor Supply of Married Couples in the Formal and Informal Sectors in Thailand
Southeast Asian Journal of Economics 2(2), December 2014: 77-102 Labor Supply of Married Couples in the Formal and Informal Sectors in Thailand Chairat Aemkulwat 1 Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University
More informationCommunity differences in availability of prepared, readyto-eat foods in U.S. food stores
Community differences in availability of prepared, readyto-eat foods in U.S. food stores Shannon N. Zenk, Lisa M. Powell, Leah Rimkus, Zeynep Isgor, Dianne Barker, & Frank Chaloupka Presenter Disclosures
More informationTable A.1: Use of funds by frequency of ROSCA meetings in 9 research sites (Note multiple answers are allowed per respondent)
Appendix Table A.1: Use of funds by frequency of ROSCA meetings in 9 research sites (Note multiple answers are allowed per respondent) Daily Weekly Every 2 weeks Monthly Every 3 months Every 6 months Total
More informationAccess. to Affordable, Nutritious Food Is Limited in Food Deserts. Michele Ver Ploeg AMBER WAVES
Access VOLUME 8 ISSUE 1 20 AMBER WAVES to Affordable, Nutritious Food Is Limited in Food Deserts Michele Ver Ploeg sverploeg@ers.usda.gov economic research service/usda A small percentage of U.S. households
More informationTim Woods Lia Nogueira Shang Ho Yang Xueting Deng WERA 72 Meetings 2014
Local Wine Expenditure Determinants in the Northern Appalachian States Tim Woods Lia Nogueira Shang Ho Yang Xueting Deng WERA 72 Meetings 2014 Motivation Expansion of wineries in the Northern Appalachian
More informationPitfalls for the Construction of a Welfare Indicator: An Experimental Analysis of the Better Life Index
Clemens Hetschko, Louisa von Reumont & Ronnie Schöb Pitfalls for the Construction of a Welfare Indicator: An Experimental Analysis of the Better Life Index University Alliance of Sustainability Spring
More informationTexas Wine Marketing Research Institute College of Human Sciences Texas Tech University CONSUMER ATTITUDES TO TEXAS WINES
Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute College of Human Sciences Texas Tech University CONSUMER ATTITUDES TO TEXAS WINES Nelson Barber, M.S. D. Christopher Taylor, M.A.M. Natalia Kolyesnikova, Ph.D. Tim
More informationA study on consumer perception about soft drink products
A study on consumer perception about soft drink products Dr.S.G.Parekh Assistant Professor, Faculty of Business Administration, Dharmsinh Desai University, Nadiad, Gujarat, India Email: sg_parekh@yahoo.com
More informationEx-Ante Analysis of the Demand for new value added pulse products: A
Ex-Ante Analysis of the Demand for new value added pulse products: A case of Precooked Beans in Uganda Paul Aseete, Enid Katungi, Jackie Bonabana, Michael Ugen and Eliud Birachi Background Common bean
More information2016 STATUS SUMMARY VINEYARDS AND WINERIES OF MINNESOTA
IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE NORTHERN GRAPES PROJECT, AN USDA SPECIALITY CROPS RESEARCH INITIATIVE PROGRAM, NIFA 2016 STATUS SUMMARY VINEYARDS AND WINERIES OF MINNESOTA Brigid Tuck and William Gartner INTRODUCTION
More informationFactors Influencing Pulse Consumption in Canada
Factors Influencing Pulse Consumption in Canada Segment Toolkit: Nobody s Unpredictable Segmentation Summary Nobody s Unpredictable 2 Pulse Consumer Segments Disinterested Unreachables 12% 20% Unexposed
More information2015 ONTARIO GRAPE + WINE INDUSTRY
2015 ONTARIO GRAPE + WINE INDUSTRY 1 Estate Winery Visitors 2015 ONTARIO GRAPE+WINE INDUSTRY Introduction Methodology Quantitative research study in-person intercept interviews in selected Niagara wineries
More informationTHE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF MODEL WINERIES IN TEXAS. Industry Report
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF MODEL WINERIES IN TEXAS Industry Report by Pati Mamardashvili, PhD International School of Economics at Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia Tim Dodd, PhD Texas Tech University,
More informationCONJOINT RESEARCH FOR CONSUMER PERCEPTION OF WINE CLOSURE OPTIONS AND THEIR IMPACT ON PURCHASE INTEREST IN THE UNITED STATES AND AUSTRALIA
CONJOINT RESEARCH FOR CONSUMER PERCEPTION OF WINE CLOSURE OPTIONS AND THEIR IMPACT ON PURCHASE INTEREST IN THE UNITED STATES AND AUSTRALIA R.N. Bleibaum 1, K.A. Lattey 2, I.L Francis 2 1 Tragon Corporation
More informationDoes Zoning for Healthy Food Access Increase the Availability of Healthy Food Outlets? Jamie F. Chriqui, PhD, MHS
Does Zoning for Healthy Food Access Increase the Availability of Healthy Food Outlets? Jamie F. Chriqui, PhD, MHS The Obesity Society Annual Meeting Atlanta, Georgia November 14, 2013 Acknowledgments Co-Authors:
More informationMeasuring household food waste The Spain experience
Measuring household food waste The Spain experience THE HOUSEHOLD FOOD WASTE PANEL Isabel Hernández Zapata Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Food and Environment (MAPAMA) ihzapata@mapama.es menosdesperdicio@mapama.es
More informationSTOP AND COMPARE SUPERMARKETS PROVIDING ACCESS TO HEALTHY FOODS
STOP AND COMPARE SUPERMARKETS PROVIDING ACCESS TO HEALTHY FOODS Hispanic American Chamber Institute 3 rd Healthy Foods Practitioners Symposium 9 March 2015 Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Guillermo Fernandez
More informationFinal Report. The Lunchtime Occasion in Republic of Ireland and Great Britain
Final Report The Lunchtime Occasion in Republic of Ireland and Great Britain November 2013 Contents Introduction & Research Objectives... 1 Research Method... 2 Segment Profiles... 3 Executive Summary...
More informationClassification Bias in Commercial Business Lists for Retail Food Outlets in the U.S
Classification Bias in Commercial Business Lists for Retail Food Outlets in the U.S American Public Health Association Denver, CO, U.S.A., vember 8, 2010 Euna Han, PhD University of Illinois at Chicago
More informationWP Council 264/ February 2016 Original: English. Guidelines for the preparation of country coffee profiles
WP Council 264/16 15 February 2016 Original: English E International Coffee Council 116 th Session 9 11 March 2016 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Guidelines for the preparation of country coffee profiles Background
More informationOverview of Presentation
The Changing Marketplace for California Crops: Focus on Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Dr. Roberta Cook Dept. of Agricultural and Resource Economics UC Davis March 2005 Overview of Presentation US food industry
More informationAttachment A. Core U.S. OJ & GJ Scanned Sales Data
Attachment A Channels Core U.S. OJ & GJ Scanned Sales Data Food ($2M+ Grocery) Drug Convenience Mass Walmart Specialty Channel Larger U.S. Universe (please describe) Market / Account Level Product Categories
More informationNutrition Environment Assessment Tool (NEAT)
Nutrition Environment Assessment Tool (NEAT) Introduction & Overview: The Nutrition Environment Assessment Tool (NEAT) assessment was developed to help communities assess their environment to find out
More informationLocal Food Action Plan Columbus City and Franklin County, Ohio Consumer Survey Summary. Overview
Local Food Action Plan Columbus City and Franklin y, Ohio Consumer Survey Summary Overview An online survey was developed by the Local Food Action Plan Team, consisting of Columbus Public Health, Local
More informationNovember 9, Myde Boles, Ph.D. Program Design and Evaluation Services Multnomah County Health Department and Oregon Public Health Division
November 9, 2010 Myde Boles, Ph.D. Program Design and Evaluation Services Multnomah County Health Department and Oregon Public Health Division Presenter Disclosures Myde Boles No Relationships to Disclose
More informationOnline Appendix for. To Buy or Not to Buy: Consumer Constraints in the Housing Market
Online Appendix for To Buy or Not to Buy: Consumer Constraints in the Housing Market By Andreas Fuster and Basit Zafar, Federal Reserve Bank of New York 1. Main Survey Questions Highlighted parts correspond
More informationGeorge Morris Centre 2009 Vineland Consumer Segmentation
George Morris Centre 2009 May 2009 Nobody s Unpredictable Table of Contents Background...3 Research Purpose & Objectives...4 Methodology...5 Executive Summary...6 Recommendations...19 Detailed Findings...23
More informationHealthy Corner Stores; a Pitt County Perspective
Healthy Corner Stores; a Pitt County Perspective Benefits of a Healthy Corner Store Initiative Percent of Customers Customer Intercept Reports Store: *Based off 20 customer surveys What would help customers
More informationWestern Uganda s Arabica Opportunity. Kampala 20 th March, 2018
Western Uganda s Arabica Opportunity Kampala 20 th March, 2018 The western region has three main islands of Arabica production we focus on the Rwenzori region served by Kasese 3 Primary focus is the Rwenzori
More informationAvailability of Nutritional Information in a National Sample of Fast Food Restaurants
Availability of Nutritional Information in a National Sample of Fast Food Restaurants Leah Rimkus, Lisa M. Powell, Zeynep Isgor, Oksana Pugach, Dianne C. Barker, Frank J. Chaloupka American Public Health
More informationConsumer Responses to Food Products Produced Near the Fukushima Nuclear Plant
Consumer Responses to Food Products Produced Near the Fukushima Nuclear Plant Kentaka Aruga Faculty of Bioproduction Science Ishikawa Prefectural University e-mail: kentaka.aruga@gmail.com Contents of
More informationII. The National School Lunch Program
II. The National School Lunch Program The National School Lunch Program (NSLP) is the largest child nutrition program in the United States. Participation in this program allows schools to receive both
More informationReminder: Objectives of focus groups in WP8 - Have an idea on how consumers elicit what traditional products are. - Identify consumption contexts of t
WP8 focus groups on traditional food Conclusions G. Giraud, AgroSup Dijon C. Amblard, VetAgroSup Clermont E. Prugnard, Belgrade 12-14 14 October 2010 1 Reminder: Objectives of focus groups in WP8 - Have
More informationMeasuring economic value of whale conservation
Measuring economic value of whale conservation Comparison between Australia and Japan Miho Wakamatsu, Kong Joo Shin, and Shunsuke Managi Urban Institute and Dept. of Urban & Env. Engineering, School of
More informationWhat are the Driving Forces for Arts and Culture Related Activities in Japan?
What are the Driving Forces for Arts and Culture Related Activities in Japan? Masahiro ARIMA Graduate School of Applied Informatics, University of Hyogo Abstract Purpose of this paper is to grasp the demand
More information2009 Fast Food (QSR) Rewards Programs Consumer Insights
2009 Fast Food (QSR) Rewards Programs Consumer Insights Key Insights 1. Low Consumer Membership in Fast Food Rewards Programs Similar to 2008, only 6% of consumers belong to rewards programs for fast food
More informationsegregation and educational opportunity
segregation and educational opportunity new evidence from population data sean f. reardon stanford university october, 2017 Data (http://seda.stanford.edu) Average district-level standardized test scores
More informationThe National Pork Board Pork Champion Quantitative Study Spring RAC 2014
The National Pork Board Quantitative Study Spring RAC 2014 Methodology Online quantitative survey, conducted March 14-18, 2014. o Total of 1000 respondents o 500 s o 500 Primary Shoppers o Respondents
More informationConsumer Perceptions: Dairy and Plant-based Milks Phase II. January 14, 2019
Consumer Perceptions: Dairy and Plant-based s Phase II January 14, 2019 1 Background & Objectives DMI would like to deepen its understanding of consumer perceptions of milk and plant-based milk alternatives
More informationComparison of FY15 and FY16 Foodservice Program Budgets
DATE: April 14, 2015 MEMO TO: ASMI Foodservice Committee FROM: Claudia Hogue; Foodservice Program Director SUBJECT: Proposed FY16 Foodservice Program Budget The following is a summary of the FY16 Foodservice
More informationIn recent years, a number of Federal
Using USDA s Thrifty Food Plan To Assess Food Availability and Affordability Margaret Andrews Linda Scott Kantor Mark Lino David Ripplinger (202) 694-5441 (703) 605-0251 mandrews@ers.usda.gov mark.lino@cnpp.usda.gov
More informationCharacteristics of U.S. Veal Consumers
Characteristics of U.S. Veal Consumers by Jason Henderson and Ken Foster Staff Paper -2 April 2 Dept. of Agricultural Economics Purdue University Purdue University is committed to the policy that all persons
More informationDanish Consumer Preferences for Wine and the Impact of Involvement
Danish Consumer Preferences for Wine and the Impact of Involvement Polymeros Chrysochou MAPP Centre, Department of Management, Aarhus University, Denmark (email: polyc@asb.dk) Jacob Brunbjerg Jørgensen
More informationGluten Free Prescribing. Engagement Survey Report Summer 2016
Gluten Free Prescribing Engagement Survey Report Summer 2016 Background Coeliac disease is an autoimmune disease which is triggered by ingesting gluten. The symptoms vary between individuals and there
More informationConsumer Preferences Trends
Consumer Preferences Trends Christine M. Bruhn Director, Retired Center for Consumer Research Dept Food Science and Technology UC Davis Factors Influencing Food Purchase International Food Information
More informationFACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SOFT DRINK CONSUMPTION IN PRESCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN IN SRI LANKA.
December 216 IJIRT Volume 3 Issue 7 ISSN: 2349-62 FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SOFT DRINK CONSUMPTION IN PRESCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN IN SRI LANKA. G.M.S.W. Silva 1, U.L.R.R.W. Premathilaka 2 1.2 Department of Food
More informationMenu Labeling Evaluation
Menu Labeling Evaluation Recommendations for restaurants Drexel University, School of Public Health Introduction Americans currently purchase over one-third of their calories dining out. Recent rising
More informationFrequently Asked Questions Nutrition Resolution
Frequently Asked Questions Nutrition Resolution 1. How many meals does Milwaukee Public Schools (MPS) serve? Milwaukee Public Schools serves meals year round. All schools with academic activities, both
More informationCut the cost of coffee in an instant
Case Study Cut the cost of coffee in an instant If you produce instant coffee you could cut packaging costs by more than 20% by moving to Best in Class packaging weights. That s the conclusion of WRAP
More informationThe Vietnam urban food consumption and expenditure study
The Centre for Global Food and Resources The Vietnam urban food consumption and expenditure study Factsheet 4: Where do consumers shop? Wet markets still dominate! The food retail landscape in urban Vietnam
More informationOKANAGAN VALLEY WINE CONSUMER RESEARCH STUDY 2008 RESULTS
RESEARCH AND PLANNING OKANAGAN VALLEY WINE CONSUMER RESEARCH STUDY 2008 RESULTS Summer 2009 Research and Planning Tourism British Columbia 3 rd Floor, 1803 Douglas St. Victoria, BC V8W 9W5 Web: www.tourismbc.com/research
More informationA Profile of the Generation X Wine Consumer in California
A Profile of the Generation X Wine Consumer in California Marianne McGarry Wolf and Colin M. McVey This research shows that the wine market in California is segmented by age. Wine consumption behavior
More informationThe determinantsof charitable givingin Belgium
The determinantsof charitable givingin Belgium 4th EMES International Research Conferenceon Social Enterprises, Liège, Belgium Amélie Mernier, Frédéric Dufays, Catherine Dal Fior July 2, 2013 Centre for
More informationPower and Priorities: Gender, Caste, and Household Bargaining in India
Power and Priorities: Gender, Caste, and Household Bargaining in India Nancy Luke Associate Professor Department of Sociology and Population Studies and Training Center Brown University Nancy_Luke@brown.edu
More informationTechnical Memorandum: Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition
Technical Memorandum: Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition Prepared for: The Franklin Institute Science Museum Prepared by: Urban Partners November 2007 Economic
More informationThe New Products People Want to Buy... And Why
The New Products People Want to Buy... And Why Plant-Based Products JANUARY 2017 What we saw this week According to Mintel s 2017 Food and Drink trend Power to the Plants, the preference for natural, simple
More informationAn Advanced Tool to Optimize Product Characteristics and to Study Population Segmentation
OP&P Product Research Utrecht, The Netherlands May 16, 2011 An Advanced Tool to Optimize Product Characteristics and to Study Population Segmentation John M. Ennis, Daniel M. Ennis, & Benoit Rousseau The
More informationGender and Firm-size: Evidence from Africa
World Bank From the SelectedWorks of Mohammad Amin March, 2010 Gender and Firm-size: Evidence from Africa Mohammad Amin Available at: https://works.bepress.com/mohammad_amin/20/ Gender and Firm size: Evidence
More informationEconomic Census Overview and Exercises
Economic Census Overview and Exercises NJ State Data Center Meeting New Brunswick, NJ June 20, 2012 Presented by: Andy Hait Economic Planning & Coordination Division Outline Economic Programs At a Glance
More information*p <.05. **p <.01. ***p <.001.
Table 1 Weighted Descriptive Statistics and Zero-Order Correlations with Fatherhood Timing (N = 1114) Variables Mean SD Min Max Correlation Interaction time 280.70 225.47 0 1095 0.05 Interaction time with
More information