Panel A: Treated firm matched to one control firm. t + 1 t + 2 t + 3 Total CFO Compensation 5.03% 0.84% 10.27% [0.384] [0.892] [0.

Similar documents
Internet Appendix for CEO Personal Risk-taking and Corporate Policies TABLE IA.1 Pilot CEOs and Firm Risk (Controlling for High Performance Pay)

Internet Appendix. For. Birds of a feather: Value implications of political alignment between top management and directors

Online Appendix to The Effect of Liquidity on Governance

Internet Appendix to. The Price of Street Friends: Social Networks, Informed Trading, and Shareholder Costs. Jie Cai Ralph A.

The Effects of Presidential Politics on CEO Compensation

Online Appendix to Voluntary Disclosure and Information Asymmetry: Evidence from the 2005 Securities Offering Reform

November K. J. Martijn Cremers Lubomir P. Litov Simone M. Sepe

The Financing and Growth of Firms in China and India: Evidence from Capital Markets

Credit Supply and Monetary Policy: Identifying the Bank Balance-Sheet Channel with Loan Applications. Web Appendix

Appendix Table A1 Number of years since deregulation

Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Jg., Heft 5, 2015, Online- Anhang

Appendix A. Table A1: Marginal effects and elasticities on the export probability

Inside the Family Firm: The Role of Families in Succession Decisions and Performance *

Guatemala. 1. Guatemala: Change in food prices

DETERMINANTS OF GROWTH

Internet Appendix for Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation? *

This appendix tabulates results summarized in Section IV of our paper, and also reports the results of additional tests.

Business Statistics /82 Spring 2011 Booth School of Business The University of Chicago Final Exam

Online Appendix for. To Buy or Not to Buy: Consumer Constraints in the Housing Market

Not to be published - available as an online Appendix only! 1.1 Discussion of Effects of Control Variables

AJAE Appendix: Testing Household-Specific Explanations for the Inverse Productivity Relationship

Online Appendix to. Are Two heads Better Than One: Team versus Individual Play in Signaling Games. David C. Cooper and John H.

Fiscal Reaction Functions of Different Euro Area Countries

Eestimated coefficient. t-value

Comparative Analysis of Fresh and Dried Fish Consumption in Ondo State, Nigeria

The Sources of Risk Spillovers among REITs: Asset Similarities and Regional Proximity

Online Appendix. for. Female Leadership and Gender Equity: Evidence from Plant Closure

Effects of Election Results on Stock Price Performance: Evidence from 1976 to 2008

Update to A Comprehensive Look at the Empirical Performance of Equity Premium Prediction

Final Exam Financial Data Analysis (6 Credit points/imp Students) March 2, 2006

Napa Highway 29 Open Wineries

Problem Set #3 Key. Forecasting

*p <.05. **p <.01. ***p <.001.

BORDEAUX WINE VINTAGE QUALITY AND THE WEATHER ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Table A.1: Use of funds by frequency of ROSCA meetings in 9 research sites (Note multiple answers are allowed per respondent)

Multiple Imputation for Missing Data in KLoSA

Gender and Firm-size: Evidence from Africa

Volume 30, Issue 1. Gender and firm-size: Evidence from Africa

Analyst coverage, information, and bubbles

Labor Supply of Married Couples in the Formal and Informal Sectors in Thailand

Appendix A. Table A.1: Logit Estimates for Elasticities

ONLINE APPENDIX APPENDIX A. DESCRIPTION OF U.S. NON-FARM PRIVATE SECTORS AND INDUSTRIES

Fair Trade and Free Entry: Can a Disequilibrium Market Serve as a Development Tool? Online Appendix September 2014

PRIVATE AND PUBLIC MERGER WAVES

Flexible Working Arrangements, Collaboration, ICT and Innovation

Relationships Among Wine Prices, Ratings, Advertising, and Production: Examining a Giffen Good

Power and Priorities: Gender, Caste, and Household Bargaining in India

To: Professor Roger Bohn & Hyeonsu Kang Subject: Big Data, Assignment April 13th. From: xxxx (anonymized) Date: 4/11/2016

Financing Decisions of REITs and the Switching Effect

Wine-Tasting by Numbers: Using Binary Logistic Regression to Reveal the Preferences of Experts

Predicting Wine Quality

Investment of private firms and the stock price of public industry peers

What does radical price change and choice reveal?

PARENTAL SCHOOL CHOICE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NORTH CAROLINA

Perspective of the Labor Market for security guards in Israel in time of terror attacks

The Role of Calorie Content, Menu Items, and Health Beliefs on the School Lunch Perceived Health Rating

Gasoline Empirical Analysis: Competition Bureau March 2005

Climate change may alter human physical activity patterns

Dietary Diversity in Urban and Rural China: An Endogenous Variety Approach

From VOC to IPA: This Beer s For You!

ICT Use and Exports. Patricia Kotnik, Eva Hagsten. This is a working draft. Please do not cite or quote without permission of the authors.

Financial Results for Fiscal Year Ending December 31, February 12, 2016 Suntory Beverage & Food Limited

OF THE VARIOUS DECIDUOUS and

The Diffusion of Informal Knowledge and Innovation Performance: A sectoral approach. M. Abraham Garcia-Torres and Hugo Hollanders

MBA 503 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

ASSESSING THE HEALTHFULNESS OF FOOD PURCHASES AMONG LOW-INCOME AREA SHOPPERS IN THE NORTHEAST

Financial Results for H1 Fiscal Year Ending December 31, August 6, 2015 Suntory Beverage & Food Limited

Should We Put Ice in Wine? A Difference-in-Differences Approach from Switzerland

Curtis Miller MATH 3080 Final Project pg. 1. The first question asks for an analysis on car data. The data was collected from the Kelly

PEEL RIVER HEALTH ASSESSMENT

Measuring the impacts of conservation tillage on household income and consumption: A Syrian case

Religion and Innovation

Looking Long: Demographic Change, Economic Crisis, and the Prospects for Reducing Poverty. La Conyuntura vs. the Long-run

Canadian Labour Market and Skills Researcher Network

Problem Set #15 Key. Measuring the Effects of Promotion II

B756: Factors Affecting the Unit Costs of Milk Distribution

A

FURTHER EXAMINING THE CONTAGION EFFECT OF LOW-QUALITY AUDITS: THE ROLE OF INDIVIDUAL AUDITORS

1/17/manufacturing-jobs-used-to-pay-really-well-notanymore-e/

Equity Capital as a Safety Cushion in the US Banking Sector

ARE THERE SKILLS PAYOFFS IN LOW AND MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES?

$ BUY STARBUCKS CORPORATION (SBUX) Rena Kaufman. Valuation Methodology. Market Data. Financial Summary (7/1/2018) Profile. Financial Analysis

CIF Stock Recommendation Report (Fall 2012)

Structural Reforms and Agricultural Export Performance An Empirical Analysis

Liquidity and Risk Premia in Electricity Futures Markets

The impact of the National Minimum Wage on UK Businesses 1

The Differential Effects of Classified Boards on Firm Value

TRADE STRUCTURE, TRADE MODE AND THE URBAN-RURAL INCOME GAP IN CHINA

The IMF s Reserves Template and Nominal Exchange Rate Volatility

Are Cover Stories Effective Contrarian Indicators?

NZ Dairy Industry Report 2015

The R&D-patent relationship: An industry perspective

Effects of political-economic integration and trade liberalization on exports of Italian Quality Wines Produced in Determined Regions (QWPDR)

Characteristics of U.S. Veal Consumers

Senarath Dharmasena Department of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M University College Station, TX

On-line Appendix for the paper: Sticky Wages. Evidence from Quarterly Microeconomic Data. Appendix A. Weights used to compute aggregate indicators

Impact of Increasing Demand for Dairy Alternative Beverages on Dairy Farmer Welfare in the United States

This is a repository copy of Poverty and Participation in Twenty-First Century Multicultural Britain.

The Bank Lending Channel of Conventional and Unconventional Monetary Policy: A Euro-area bank-level Analysis

2016 STATUS SUMMARY VINEYARDS AND WINERIES OF MINNESOTA

Transcription:

Online Appendix 1

Table O1: Determinants of CMO Compensation: Selection based on both number of other firms in industry that have CMOs and number of other firms in industry with MBA educated executives The table reports two-stage Heckman sample-selection regressions for Total CMO Compensation, CMO Market Compensation, or CMO Delta. The first stage (Selection) is a probit equation where the dependent variable equals one if the firm has an observable CMO, and zero otherwise. The second stage (Outcome) is either an or system regression where the dependent variable is the compensation variable. Industry use of CMO is the proportion of other firms in that industry that have observable CMOs. Proportion of industry with MBA executives is the proportion of other firms in that industry with a top executive that has an MBA. Lambda is the inverse Mills ratio estimated from the Selection equation. The other variables are as defined in Table 1. t-statistics, based on robust standard errors that are clustered by firm, are reported in parentheses. Year fixed effects are included in all specifications. ***, **, and * represent significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels respectively. Selection Selection Selection Advertising 0.9909 *** 1.2768 ** 2.7695 *** 0.0322 ** 0.0984 ** 0.0014 1.1538 ** 1.5794 * 2.2661 *** (3.26) (2.47) (7.01) (2.42) (2.00) ( 0.03) (2.54) (1.84) (5.08) R&D 0.4239 *** 0.3503 *** 0.5888 *** 0.2411 *** 0.2360 *** 0.4868 *** 0.4315 *** 0.3077 * 0.5596 *** (5.03) (2.77) (5.35) (8.62) (4.54) (4.37) (3.33) (1.78) (4.42) Industry Concentration 0.2043 ** -0.2326 * 0.2795 ** 0.0935 *** -0.0807 * 0.3312 ** 0.2342-0.1788 0.3167 ** ( 2.06) (-1.89) (2.17) ( 2.84) (-1.74) (2.58) ( 1.64) (-1.60) (2.18) CEO Value of Dependent 0.2281 *** 0.2249 *** 0.0027 0.4395 *** 0.4525 *** 0.1098 *** 0.4675 *** 0.4411 *** 0.0039 Variable (32.91) (5.07) ( 0.29) (49.56) (25.50) (3.17) (67.62) (22.88) ( 0.60) Size 0.3298 *** 0.2996 *** 0.0609 *** 0.0366 *** 0.0324 *** 0.0673 *** 0.1665 *** 0.1487 *** 0.0631 *** (54.61) (10.28) ( 8.06) (19.84) (9.99) ( 9.95) (19.26) (5.77) ( 8.02) Market-to-Book 0.0129 ** 0.0010 0.0299 *** 0.0026 0.0069* 0.0352 *** 0.0350 *** 0.0231 0.0295 *** ( 2.01) (0.10) (3.43) (1.23) (1.90) (4.05) (3.44) (1.31) (2.87) CAPEX 0.2228 0.1866 0.8605 *** 0.2264 *** 0.1966 *** 0.7912 *** 0.2456 0.1956 0.7473 *** (1.54) (0.85) (4.83) (4.72) (2.93) (4.45) (1.11) (0.79) (3.70) Leverage 0.0664-0.0133 0.4943 *** 0.0056 0.0170 0.5162 *** 0.1307-0.2344 * 0.5509 *** (1.00) (-0.13) ( 6.30) (0.26) (0.49) ( 6.58) ( 1.30) (-1.67) ( 6.21) Std. Ret 2.6586 *** 1.9050 *** 0.8056 *** 0.5750 *** 0.4318 *** 0.7162 *** 1.6923 *** 0.9631 * 0.0399 (12.95) (6.18) (2.95) (8.46) (3.90) (2.62) (5.38) (1.72) (0.13) Lagged Compensation Variable 0.0435 0.0237 0.0893 (0.95) (0.81) (1.63) Proportion of industry with 1.4503 *** 1.5323 *** 1.7602 *** MBA executives (4.94) (5.24) (5.41) Industry use of CMO 1.0350 *** 0.9930 *** 0.6186 * (3.57) (3.44) (1.94) Lambda 0.2427 *** - 0.0427 *** -0.0258 * 0.1775 *** -0.1280 ** ( 7.82) (-3.26) ( 4.25) (-1.92) ( 3.76) (-2.03) Constant 2.6105 *** 2.7234 *** 1.0281 *** 0.0842 *** -0.1058 *** 1.0251 *** 0.7867 *** -0.5538 *** 0.9854 *** (36.20) (10.11) ( 11.98) ( 3.93) (-3.85) ( 13.18) ( 7.88) (-3.17) ( 11.11) Observations 23,454 23,454 23,454 23,454 23,454 23,454 19,051 19,051 19,051 F-statistic 413.85 *** 127.60 *** 220.11 *** 94.90 *** 384.82 *** 109.80 *** Adj. R 2 /Pseudo-R 2 0.595 0.638 0.099 0.438 0.483 0.098 0.650 0.709 0.100 2

Table O2 Difference-in-difference analysis of Change in CFO compensation after initiation of advertising In this table, we report the difference in changes in CFO compensation between advertising and nonadvertising firms following the initiation of advertising. Treated firms are firms that switch from not advertising, to advertising, and maintain this status for at least three fiscal years after the inception of advertising. Treated firms are matched to control firms that do not advertise over the same period but are similar with respect to R&D spending, industry concentration, firm size, market-to-book, capital expenditure, leverage, standard deviation returns and total CFO and CEO compensation in the year in which the treated firm initiated advertising. We report the difference in changes in compensation between treated and control firms between the year the treated firm initiated advertising (t) and t + n, where n is 1, 2 or 3. p-values (reported in brackets) testing whether or not the difference-in-difference is greater than zero are reported below each estimate. The variables are as defined in Table 1. None of the values reported are significant at either the 1%, 5%, or 10% level. Panel A: Treated firm matched to one control firm t + 1 t + 2 t + 3 Total CFO Compensation 5.03% 0.84% 10.27% [0.384] [0.892] [0.224] Market CFO Compensation 7.07% -3.07% 3.83% [0.157] [0.593] [0.499] CFO Delta 8.68% -26.40% -8.09% [0.426] [0.200] [0.605] Panel B: Treated firm matched to two control firms t + 1 t + 2 t + 3 Total CFO Compensation 5.78% 1.31% 6.94% [0.254] [0.812] [0.251] Market CFO Compensation 6.91% 0.01% 2.36% [0.113] [0.999] [0.650] CFO Delta 2.24% -27.35% 10.33% [0.813] [0.112] [0.493] 3

Table O3 Deviations from expected CMO total compensation and firm performance The table reports dynamic panel regressions of various measures of firm performance on deviations from expected compensation CMO total compensation, and other firm characteristics. In columns (1) and (2), the dependent variable is return on assets (ROA) which is measured as the operating income before depreciation, scaled by total assets. In columns (3) and (4), the dependent variable is Earnings surprise which is the difference between the firm s actual earnings per share and median consensus analysts forecast, scaled by the price at the end of the fiscal year. In columns (5) and (6), the dependent variable is Annual Stock Return which is the one year holding period stock return. Deviation is the absolute deviation from expected CMO total compensation. Deviation + equals the absolute deviation for positive values of deviation, and is zero otherwise. Deviation equals the absolute deviation for negative values of deviation, and is zero otherwise. The other variables are as defined in Table 1. t-statistics, based on robust standard errors that are clustered by firm, are reported in parentheses. Year fixed effects are included in all specifications. ***, **, and * represent significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels respectively. ROA Earnings Surprise Stock Return Deviation 0.0081 *** 0.0085 *** 0.0083 *** 0.0073 *** 0.0696 *** 0.0829 ** ( 3.57) ( 2.81) ( 3.78) ( 2.80) ( 2.64) ( 2.16) Size 0.0026 *** 0.0055 *** 0.0084 *** 0.0106 *** 0.0320 *** 0.0302 ** (4.50) (5.61) (11.24) (8.49) (6.11) (2.30) Market-to-Book 0.0126 *** 0.0163 *** 0.0009* 0.0006 0.1180 *** 0.0986 *** (12.36) (8.01) (1.91) (0.96) (14.26) (3.80) CAPEX 0.0865 *** 0.1546 *** 0.0571 *** 0.0892 *** 0.6664 *** 1.4247 *** (3.98) (4.03) (3.93) (3.28) ( 4.55) ( 3.42) Leverage 0.0250 *** 0.0653 *** 0.0743 *** 0.0907 *** 0.2709 *** 0.0438 ( 3.51) ( 5.32) ( 5.78) ( 4.50) (2.87) ( 0.47) Std. Ret 0.0971 *** 0.0394 0.0816 *** 0.0886 *** 2.0196 *** 0.6560 ( 3.68) ( 1.10) (3.42) (2.83) (6.44) (1.22) Lagged Performance 0.7276 *** 0.4759 *** 0.3012 *** 0.0003 0.0804 *** 0.5938 (50.91) (8.12) (8.49) ( 0.00) ( 4.52) (1.45) Constant 0.0157 *** 0.0103 0.0841 *** 0.1031 *** 0.3518 *** 0.3013 * (2.68) (0.94) ( 5.36) ( 5.95) ( 3.53) ( 1.82) Observations 5,739 5,739 5,798 5,798 5,747 5,747 F-statistic 544.96 78.31 55.59 11.49 56.90 53.59 Adj. R 2 0.711 0.682 0.197 0.131 0.202 0.307 4

Table O4 Deviations from expected CMO market compensation and firm performance The table reports dynamic panel regressions of various measures of firm performance on deviations from expected CMO market compensation, and other firm characteristics. In columns (1) and (2), the dependent variable is return on assets (ROA) which is measured as the operating income before depreciation, scaled by total assets. In columns (3) and (4), the dependent variable is Earnings surprise which is the difference between the firm s actual earnings per share and median consensus analysts forecast, scaled by the price at the end of the fiscal year. In columns (5) and (6), the dependent variable is Annual Stock Return which is the one year holding period stock return. Deviation is the absolute deviation from expected CMO market compensation. Deviation + equals the absolute deviation for positive values of deviation, and is zero otherwise. Deviation equals the absolute deviation for negative values of deviation, and is zero otherwise. The other variables are as defined in Table 1. t-statistics, based on robust standard errors that are clustered by firm, are reported in parentheses. Year fixed effects are included in all specifications. ***, **, and * represent significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels respectively. ROA Earnings Surprise Stock Return Deviation 0.0198 *** 0.0177 ** 0.0146 ** 0.0171 ** 0.2943 *** 0.2243 ** ( 3.01) ( 2.57) ( 2.21) ( 2.19) ( 4.43) ( 2.21) Size 0.0023 *** 0.0053 *** 0.0081 *** 0.0104 *** 0.0299 *** 0.0272 ** (4.11) (5.43) (11.04) (8.33) (5.57) (1.96) Market-to-Book 0.0125 *** 0.0163 *** 0.0009 * 0.0006 0.1183 *** 0.0980 *** (12.30) (8.01) (1.83) (0.96) (14.35) (3.69) CAPEX 0.0858 *** 0.1564 *** 0.0577 *** 0.0897 *** 0.6726 *** 1.4305 *** (3.94) (4.08) (3.98) (3.33) ( 4.60) ( 3.35) Leverage 0.0242 *** 0.0647 *** 0.0737 *** 0.0900 *** 0.2750 *** 0.0345 ( 3.40) ( 5.26) ( 5.72) ( 4.47) (2.92) ( 0.36) Std. Ret 0.0984 *** 0.0417 0.0784 *** 0.0876 *** 2.0381 *** 0.6471 ( 3.70) ( 1.18) (3.34) (2.83) (6.45) (1.18) Lagged Performance 0.7292 *** 0.4735 *** 0.3012 *** 0.0015 0.0805 *** 0.6047 (51.13) (8.02) (8.46) ( 0.01) ( 4.49) (1.43) Constant 0.0171 *** 0.0120 0.0827 *** 0.1013 *** 0.3198 *** 0.2861 * (2.90) (1.08) ( 5.24) ( 5.84) ( 3.23) ( 1.66) Observations 5,739 5,739 5,798 5,798 5,747 5,747 F-statistic 544.29 *** 74.90 *** 55.12 *** 11.47 *** 57.34 *** 53.89 *** Adj. R 2 0.711 0.681 0.195 0.129 0.203 0.308 5

Table O5 Deviations from CMO Delta and Firm Performance The table reports dynamic panel regressions of various measures of firm performance on deviations from expected CMO Delta, and other firm characteristics. In columns (1) and (2), the dependent variable is return on assets (ROA) which is measured as the operating income before depreciation, scaled by total assets. In columns (3) and (4), the dependent variable is Earnings surprise which is the difference between the firm s actual earnings per share and median consensus analysts forecast, scaled by the price at the end of the fiscal year. In columns (5) and (6), the dependent variable is Annual Stock Return which is the one year holding period stock return. Deviation is the absolute deviation from expected CMO Delta. Deviation + equals the absolute deviation for positive values of deviation, and is zero otherwise. Deviation equals the absolute deviation for negative values of deviation, and is zero otherwise. The other variables are as defined in Table 1. t-statistics, based on robust standard errors that are clustered by firm, are reported in parentheses. Year fixed effects are included in all specifications. ***, **, and * represent significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels respectively. ROA Earnings Surprise Stock Return Deviation 0.0039 ** 0.0033 * 0.0046 *** 0.0061 *** 0.0328 ** 0.0133 * ( 2.40) ( 1.79) ( 3.13) ( 3.57) ( 2.53) ( 1.92) Size 0.0023 *** 0.0043 *** 0.0087 *** 0.0109 *** 0.0285 *** 0.0428 *** (3.56) (4.40) (9.76) (7.96) (5.14) (5.29) Market to-book 0.0145 *** 0.0209 *** 0.0020 *** 0.0022 *** 0.1058 *** 0.1317 *** (10.59) (8.76) (3.06) (2.71) (10.71) (8.36) CAPEX 0.0711 *** 0.1450 *** 0.0526 *** 0.1002 *** 0.3386 ** 0.3452 * (2.72) (3.31) (3.13) (3.74) ( 2.39) ( 1.72) Leverage 0.0226 *** 0.0565 *** 0.0687 *** 0.0828 *** 0.0015 0.1090 ( 2.71) ( 4.35) ( 4.65) ( 4.54) ( 0.02) ( 1.48) Std. Ret 0.1259 *** 0.1031 *** 0.0716 ** 0.0756 ** 0.8421 *** 0.5879 ( 4.21) ( 2.75) (2.50) (2.25) (2.79) (1.61) Lagged Performance 0.7438 *** 0.4915 *** 0.3161 *** 0.0573 0.1408 *** 0.2277 (40.66) (7.80) (6.69) ( 0.34) ( 6.58) ( 1.26) Constant 0.0132 ** 0.0021 0.0950 *** 0.1055 *** 0.2547 ** 0.3973 *** (1.97) (0.18) ( 4.53) ( 7.67) ( 2.01) ( 4.76) Observations 4,300 4,300 4,341 4,341 4,318 4,318 F-statistic 426.13 *** 75.09 *** 40.89 *** 9.13 *** 37.01 *** 43.08 *** Adj. R 2 0.720 0.695 0.193 0.110 0.178 0.282 6

Table O6 Variance Inflation Factors The table reports the variance inflation factors for the explanatory variables in the regressions reported in Tables 3, 4 and 5. For each compensation variable, we report the variance inflation factor for each variable estimated following the regression of the determinants of each compensation variable Total Compensation Market Compensation Compensation Delta CMO Tenure 4.84 4.85 4.63 New CMO 4.78 4.79 4.57 Std. Ret 2.23 2.25 2.17 Size 1.74 1.46 1.43 Market-to-Book 1.52 1.51 1.61 Leverage 1.36 1.36 1.41 R&D 1.33 1.36 1.35 CEO Value of Compensation Variable 1.47 1.27 1.29 CAPEX 1.11 1.12 1.12 Advertising 1.03 1.03 1.04 Industry Concentration 1.03 1.03 1.02 7

Table O7 Determinants of compensation: alternative definition of industry concentration The table reports regressions where the dependent variable is total compensation, market compensation, or compensation Delta, of the CMO. Industry concentration is measured at the three-digit SIC code level. The other explanatory variables are as defined in Table 1. t-statistics, based on robust standard errors that are clustered by firm, are reported in parentheses. Year fixed effects are included in all specifications. ***, **, and * represent significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels respectively. Total Compensation Market Compensation Delta Advertising 1.6698 *** 1.6396 *** 0.1177 * 0.2160 ** 1.8054 *** 2.3809 ** (6.41) (3.57) (1.83) (2.02) (4.95) (2.30) R&D 0.5234 *** 0.5630 *** 0.2115 *** 0.2648 *** 0.5707 *** 0.3930 ** (6.14) (4.55) (6.92) (5.68) (5.03) (2.00) Industry Concentration 0.1280 * 0.1222 * 0.0733 *** 0.0776 * 0.1925 * 0.1759 ** ( 1.84) ( 1.92) ( 2.91) ( 1.81) ( 1.91) ( 2.05) CEO Value of Dependent 0.2357 *** 0.2262 *** 0.4579 *** 0.4531 *** 0.4407 *** 0.4223 *** Variable (8.44) (4.01) (44.61) (26.54) (68.79) (25.25) Size 0.3162 *** 0.2773 *** 0.0389 *** 0.0388 *** 0.1786 *** 0.1719 *** (20.89) (8.96) (20.28) (11.78) (23.58) (6.96) Market-to-Book 0.0209 *** 0.0128 0.0015 0.0006 0.0225 *** 0.0042 ( 2.98) ( 1.38) ( 0.66) ( 0.20) (2.59) (0.20) CAPEX 0.1800 0.1675 0.1752 *** 0.1487 *** 0.3711 ** 0.3400 (1.51) (1.00) (4.39) (2.61) (2.04) (1.38) Leverage 0.1928 *** 0.2751 *** 0.0301 0.0563 * 0.2636 *** 0.2801 ** ( 3.43) ( 3.00) ( 1.47) ( 1.74) ( 3.01) ( 2.09) Std. Ret 3.0945 *** 2.0140 *** 0.7480 *** 0.4768 *** 2.2229 *** 1.9938 *** (13.42) (6.78) (10.57) (4.76) (8.00) (4.01) CMO Tenure 0.0026 0.0279 0.0156 ** 0.0265 *** 0.0310 0.0036 (0.12) ( 1.11) ( 2.23) ( 2.78) (0.97) ( 0.09) New CMO 0.0004 0.0005 0.0093 0.0025 0.0340 0.0107 ( 0.01) ( 0.02) (0.99) ( 0.22) (0.80) (0.21) Lagged Compensation 0.0990 *** 0.0272 0.0651 (2.65) (1.02) (1.24) Constant 2.0911 *** 2.1181 *** 0.2075 *** 0.1256 ** 1.2481 *** 0.9479 *** (17.40) (8.91) ( 5.05) ( 2.55) ( 4.92) ( 5.93) Observations 8,806 6,191 8,797 6,184 6,330 3,781 F-statistics 105.61 *** 135.03 *** 235.14 *** 111.02 *** 311.13 *** 96.96 *** Adj. R 2 /Pseudo- R 2 0.602 0.648 0.468 0.520 0.618 0.668 8