and the use of kelpak in their production

Similar documents
Pecan Production 101: Sunlight, Crop Load Management, Pollination. Lenny Wells UGA Extension Horticulture

CHEMICAL THINNING OF APPLE UNDER NORWEGIAN CONDITIONS. WHAT WORKS?

PLANT GROWTH IN HARMONY WITH NATURE +16%

ProGibb LV Plus Plant Growth Regulator to Increase Fruit Size and Yield of Avocados

Effects of Seedling Age, and Different Levels of N, K and K/N on Quality and Yield of Tomato Grown in Perlite Bag Culture

Stella Maris on Wine Grapes. Spring, 2018

Vital Earth Resources 706 East Broadway, Gladewater, Texas (903) FAX: (903) Crop Results

AMINOFIT.Xtra, SOME TEST RESULTS

Crop Specific Application Rates & Timings. Crop Timing of Application Rate/ Acre. 1. Start of growth in spring

Improving Efficacy of GA 3 to Increase Fruit Set and Yield of Clementine Mandarins in California

NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY:

Citrus: World Markets and Trade

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

Spices of the World. Spices Drove Exploration. An Overview. Major voyages of exploration in search of spices Pepper and Clove

WINE GRAPE TRIAL REPORT

(36) PROHEXADIONE-CALCIUM AFFECTS SHOOT GROWTH AND YIELD OF LEMON, ORANGE AND AVOCADO DIFFERENTLY

All Grapes Acreage (wine, table, raisin): Wine Grapes Estimate: 2010 Estimate: Total: 842,000 Acres. Total: 535,000 Acres

Coffee market remains volatile but lacks direction

Chile. Tree Nuts Annual. Almonds and Walnuts Annual Report

Coffee prices rose slightly in January 2019

Materials and Methods

Management of Croploadon Honeycrispto optimize fruit quality and return bloom

The Pomology Post. Hull Rot Management on Almonds. by Brent Holtz, Ph.D., University of California Pomology Advisor

THE EVALUATION OF WALNUT VARIETIES FOR CALIFORNIA S CENTRAL COAST REGION 2007 HARVEST

Coffee market continues downward trend

Results and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe

Use of Plant Growth Regulators to Increase Fruit Set, Fruit Size and Yield and to Manipulate Vegetative and Floral Shoot Growth

G. Ferrara 1, A. Mazzeo 1, A.M.S. Matarrese 1, C. Pacucci 1, V. Gallo 2,3

July marks another month of continuous low prices

Use of Plant Growth Regulators for Improving Lemon Fruit Size

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

Volatility returns to the coffee market as prices stay low

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

Varietal Decisions on Citrus

MONTHLY COFFEE MARKET REPORT

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

Quadrilateral vs bilateral VSP An alternative option to maintain yield?

Plant root activity is limited to the soil bulbs Does not require technical expertise to. wetted by the water bottle emitter implement

HISTORY USES AND HEALTH BENEFITS. Figure 31. Nanking cherries

w w w. s o p i b. c o m Sulphate of Potash and Wine Grapes

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

PGR Strategies to Increase Yield of Hass Avocado

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Tea Research Foundation Central Africa

Module 6. Yield and Fruit Size. Presenter: Stephan Verreynne

PLANT GROWTH IN HARMONY WITH NATURE +16%

KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN

Quadrilateral vs bilateral VSP An alternative option to maintain yield?

Do lower yields on the vine always make for better wine?

Carrot Trial 2014 Elkus Test Garden

Fruit Set, Growth and Development

Effect of Storage Period and Ga3 Soaking of Bulbs on Growth, Flowering and Flower Yield of Tuberose (Polianthes Tuberosa L.) Cv.

NIMITZ NEMATICIDE FIELD TRIALS

Application Guide Others Using Masinag Organic Fertilizer

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

Coffee market ends 2017/18 in surplus

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

Flowering and Fruiting Morphology of Hardy Kiwifruit, Actinidia arguta

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

The Australian Almond Industry

Volunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat year two. Mark Thorne, Henry Wetzel, Drew Lyon, Tim Waters

Bounty71 rootstock an update

Downward correction as funds respond to increasingly positive supply outlook

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

MALUMA HASS : A NEW RELEASED CULTIVAR IN COMPARISON WITH HASS

MALUMA HASS : A NEW RELEASED CULTIVAR IN COMPARISON WITH HASS

UNDERSTANDING CHINA: THE PECAN EXPORT MARKET & TOTAL CONSUMPTION

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

Achieving larger Ettinger fruit by foliar application of Plant Growth Regulators (PGRs)

Record exports in coffee year 2017/18

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

PTNPA Other Nut Report. Bobby Tankersley JOHN B. SANFILIPPO & SON

2014 Agrium AT Fertilizer Trial Glen R. Obear and Bill Kreuser, Ph.D University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Objectives

Coffee market settles lower amidst strong global exports

Chapter 3 Microcatchment water harvesting systems for fruit trees and shrubs

Chemical Control of Avocado Root Rot and Stem Canker

To study the effects of four different levels of fertilizer NPK nutrients, applied at a ratio of N:P 2

Quality of western Canadian flaxseed 2012

AGRABLAST and AGRABURST TREATMENT OF COFFEE FUNGUS AND BLACK SIGATOKA ON BANANAS

ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MAIZE CULTIVATED AREA AND PRODUCTION IN ROMANIA

Australia and Beyond: Research & Grower Experiences. Dr. Mercy Olmstead Stone Fruit Extension Specialist

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Coffee market ends 2016/17 coffee year in deficit for the third consecutive year

Is fruit dry matter concentration a useful predictor of Honeycrisp apple fruit quality after storage?

Dragon Fruit - Hylocereus undatus

1

Tree Nuts TYPES, VARIETIES & CUTS

Improvement of yield and fruit quality of neglected mango orchards in Yen Chau, Son La. Pham Thi Huong Hanoi University of Agriculture

CITRUS CARE FOR THE LOW DESERT RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPE

Grower Summary TF 170. Plums: To determine the performance of 6 new plum varieties. Annual 2012

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

Kelli Stokely Masters of Agriculture candidate Department of Horticulture Oregon Wine Research Institute

POTATOES USA / SNAC-INTERNATIONAL OUT-OF-STORAGE CHIP QUALITY MICHIGAN REGIONAL REPORT

North San Joaquin Valley Almond Day

AMAZONIA (BRAZIL) NUTS MACADAMIAS HAZELNUTS PISTACHIOS WALNUTS PINE NUTS PECANS

7. LOCALIZATION OF FRUIT ON THE TREE, BRANCH GIRDLING AND FRUIT THINNING

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

Transcription:

Nuts have played an important role in the human diet through the centuries. They can be divided into temperate climate species such as almonds, chestnuts, hazelnuts, pecan, pistachio and walnuts, while sub-tropical species include macadamias, cashews and Brazil nuts. Almonds The almond is related to stone fruit and, as native to Eurasia, has been cultivated for thousands of years. The seed contains amygdalin, a cyanide-producing compound, which gives the typical bitter almond taste and flavour. READ ARTICLE Chestnuts This crop has four commercially-important species worldwide known as American, European, Chinese and Japanese chestnuts. However, due to chestnut blight that severely affected this crop, only the Japanese chestnut remains commercially important in the USA. The chestnut has the unique feature of being eaten without much drying. Hazelnuts These nuts, also called Filberts or cob nuts, are native in the northern temperate zones. Only the European species is commercially cultivated and is mostly ground into a powder form used to flavour sweets and ice-cream, or to produce a nut paste. Most hazelnut production is in Oregon, USA. READ ARTICLE Kelpak is unique as an auxin source, as the pure formulation has been approved for use in organic crop production according to the standards of the US National Organic Program (NOP), EEC Regulation 2092/91 and Biological Farmers of Australia (BFA). MORE ON KELPAK Pistachio The pistachio is native to the eastern Mediterranean area and parts of Asia, and has been cultivated for over 000 years. It is mainly used as salted nuts, or as flavourant in ice-cream, cakes and nougat. continued on next page...

Pecan The nut is classified together with walnuts into the Walnut family and is related to hickory nuts and butternuts. It is native to Mexico and southwest America and currently has more than 00 listed varieties. Walnut Two types of walnuts are found, the lesser-known English walnut native to Europe and Asia and, most important commercially, the Black walnut native to North America. Walnuts are consumed as is, or in ice-cream and sweets, due to their strong taste. Macadamia The Macadamia integrifolia tree species is a member of the Proteaceae family and is native to the tropical regions of eastern Australia. Macadamias are currently cultivated worldwide and the nuts have become an important agricultural crop. Some cultivation problems include poor fruit set, specific climatic growing condition requirements and difficulties in shelling the very hard shells of these nuts. READ ARTICLE Cashew Native to the forests of northern South America, these nuts are related to species such as poison ivy and mangoes. A unique feature of this crop is that the oil of the seeds and juice of the fruit may be used as an anti-plaque product for dental protection. Brazil nut The Brazil nut is native to the forests of South America, with most of the worldwide production still originating from wild trees. The nuts are borne in large wooden spheres weighing up to 2.5 kg each. back to previous page...

Auxins and plant development The most dominant effect of auxins on plants is the stimulation of lateral root development after treatment. Other improved responses from this group of hormones stated in the literature include improved cell division, cell enlargement, flower development, fruit set, set retention and size of fruits. One of the requirements for good fruit set is sufficient elongation of the pollen tube. Auxins are present in pollen and play an important role in pollen tube elongation. When natural levels of auxins in pollen are too low, the application of exogenous auxins will help to alleviate the problem and subsequently improve fruit set. These auxin response claims led to trials with Kelpak foliar spray programs on almonds, hazelnuts, macadamias and pistachios to evaluate the effect on general growth, nut set and quality, and total nut yield. Kelpak as auxin source Kelpak is a seaweed product, extracted from the species Ecklonia maxima, found only at the southern tip of Africa. The raw material itself contains high levels of natural auxins and these levels are maintained in the end product due to the unique pressure differential extraction method which has no negative effect on the delicate auxin molecules. Several different natural auxins have been identified in Kelpak, giving an average biological auxin activity equivalent to 11 mg indole butyric acid (IBA) via bioassay. Kelpak is unique as an auxin source, as the pure formulation has been approved for use in organic crop production according to the standards of the US National Organic Program (NOP), EEC Regulation 2092/91 and Biological Farmers of Australia (BFA). AUXINS RELEASED USING CELLBURST PROCESS

Macadamia The first Kelpak trial on a nut crop was conducted on a commercial farm in Malawi where 120 trees were selected from each of six Macadamia clones. Six trees of each clone were left as controls, while Kelpak foliar sprays at 2 L/ha (2 pints/acre) were applied to six more trees of each clone. Kelpak was first applied on 1 June at a prebloom stage and repeated three more times at monthly intervals. All other management practices were the same throughout the trials. Visual evaluation during the growth season showed healthier leaves and more dense canopies on the treated trees, indicating improved vegetative growth. All Kelpak-treated trees by clone had higher harvest yields than the control, varying from a 17 to 5% increase over each control (Figure 1), suggesting better nut set and retention. The treated tree yields also produced a higher crack-out percentage than the control and, ultimately, a higher marketable return than the control. This positive result was followed up by a statistical trial on a commercial farm in the sub-tropical Mpumalanga Region of South Africa. Two foliar treatment programs were evaluated. Kelpak applied at 0.2% (200 ml/100 L water) five times was compared to 0.% (00 ml/100 L water) Kelpak applied three times and a control. The 0.2% Kelpak was applied at 50% bloom, full bloom and three more times at monthly intervals. The 0.% Kelpak treatment was applied at full bloom and twice more at monthly intervals. All other standard management practices were followed in the trial orchard. Tree vigour was evaluated during the season, nut drop was recorded during the main drop stages and nut yield per tree and crack-out percentage were measured at harvest. continued... % increase in marketable return above control 5 0 25 20 15 10 5 0 Figure 1. % INCREASE IN MARKETABLE RETURN ABOVE CONTROL, MALAWI CLONE 246 CLONE 44 CLONE 508 CLONE 660 CLONE 741 CLONE 800 AVERAGE MACADAMIA CLONE

Figure1. % INCREASE IN MARKETABLE RETURN ABOVE CONTROL, MALAWI % increase in marketable return above control 5 0 25 20 15 10 5 0 CLONE 246 CLONE 44 CLONE 508 CLONE 660 CLONE 741 CLONE 800 AVERAGE MACADAMIA CLONE BACK

Both Kelpak treatments had more vigorous growth ratings than the control, with the 0.2% Kelpak the best (Table 1). Significantly less nut drop was recorded for both Kelpak treatments compared to the control, with the 0.2% Kelpak treatment the most successful at 6% less nut drop. Visual evaluations at this time illustrated the increased nut set of the Kelpak treatments compared to the control treatment (Figure 2). Both Kelpak treatments had higher nut yields than the control, with the 0.2% Kelpak treatment statistically significant with a 15% improvement. Kelpak treatments had no effect on crack-out percentage of the nuts. Kelpak treated trees resulted in greater nut set and less nut drop with a higher nut yield without compromising nut quality and, therefore, a higher net return than the control trees. continued... Table 1. Evaluation of Kelpak trial on Macadamia, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa CONTROL KELPAK Figure 2. RECOMMENDATION FOR BEARING MACADAMIA TREATMENT Kelpak 0.2%x5 GROWTH SCORE 2.96.58 TOTAL FRUIT DROP (kg)* 8a 24b (-6%) TREE YIELD (kg/tree)* 18.6a 21.4b (+15%) CRACKOUT % 4 ns 4 ns RATE Apply 0.2% Kelpak (200 ml Kelpak/100 L water) as a full cover foliar spray Kelpak 0.%x.12 0ab (-21%) 20.1ab (+8%) **Values with the same letter do not differ significantly from each other; ns = not significant, (p=0.05) ns TIMING at 50% bloom and full bloom, and repeat twice or three times at monthly intervals.

Table 1. Evaluation of Kelpak trial on Macadamia, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa TREATMENT GROWTH SCORE TOTAL FRUIT DROP (kg)* TREE YIELD (kg/tree)* CRACKOUT % 2.96 8a 18.6a 4 ns Kelpak 0.2%x5.58 24b (-6%) 21.4b (+15%) 4 ns Kelpak 0.%x.12 0ab (-21%) 20.1ab (+8%) ns **Values with the same letter do not differ significantly from each other; ns = not significant, (p=0.05) BACK

Almond Several trials were conducted on almonds in California, covering four locations and the varieties, Mission and Nonpareil. Treatment always consisted of three applications of Kelpak, with the first starting at 50% bloom. Initially, with the first application a simulated fertigation application was compared to a full cover spray. All other applications were done as a full cover spray using 1000 L water/ha (100 gallons/acre). The rates tested were either 2 or L/ha (2 or pints/acre) and the intervals between application varied from 14 to 21 days. All Kelpak treatments gave numerical nut meat yield increases above the control, although not all differed significantly (Table 2). On average, the application by foliar spray at 50% bloom was as effective as the fertigation application. Only two Kelpak treatments gave less than 20% increase above the control, with the lowest yield increase at 7% and the second lowest at 15%. All the other Kelpak treatments had yield increases above 20%, with the highest increases above 40%. The average yield increase over all Kelpak treatments compared to the control was 714 kg/ha, 27% higher than the control. The yield increases were attributed to better nut set and retention as the meat to nut ratios were not affected by the Kelpak treatments. continued... IMPERIAL Effect of Kelpak treatment on the yield of almonds in California VARIETY Nonpareil Nonpareil Mission Average METRIC RATE (pints/acre) 2 PLANTING (trees/acre) 124 124 124 124 87 87 110 06 06 1st APPLICATION x spray x spray x spray x spray x spray x spray MEAT YIELD (pounds/acre) 26 26 2666 2666 197 197 26 1724 1724 29 Kelpak 474 4721 1 445 2840 2270 2916 2140 2148 00 TABLE 2 INCREASE % 7 46 24 29 44 15 25 24 25 27

IMPERIAL METRIC TABLE 2 Effect of Kelpak treatment on the yield of almonds in California VARIETY RATE (pints/acre) PLANTING (trees/acre) 1st APPLICATION MEAT YIELD (pounds/acre) INCREASE % Nonpareil 124 x spray 26 Kelpak 474 7 Nonpareil 124 26 4721 46 124 x spray 2666 1 24 124 2666 445 29 87 x spray 197 2840 44 87 197 2270 15 Mission 110 x spray 26 2916 25 2 06 x spray 1724 2140 24 06 x spray 1724 2148 25 Average 29 00 27 BACK

IMPERIAL METRIC TABLE 2 Effect of Kelpak treatment on the yield of almonds in California VARIETY RATE (L/ha) PLANTING (trees/ha) 1st APPLICATION MEAT YIELD INCREASE % Nonpareil 06 x spray 627 Kelpak 894 7 Nonpareil 06 627 5292 46 06 x spray 2988 71 24 06 2988 861 29 215 x spray 2211 18 44 215 2211 2544 15 Mission 272 x spray 2618 268 25 2 06 x spray 192 299 24 06 x spray 192 2407 25 Average 2682 96 27 BACK

Almonds in Australia Newly planted Carmel and Monterey trees in Australia were treated with a soil drench and two periodical foliar applications early in the growing season. This lead to a good increase in average trunk diameter of treated versus control trees at the end of the growing season. The treated trees were also sprayed twice with Kelpak at pints in 100 gallons water/acre ( L in 1000 L water/ha) at 50% bloom and at shuck split in the first year of production. The Carmel treated trees yielded on average 8.6 lb (.9 kg) per tree and the control trees 7.5 lb (.4 kg) in shell nuts, an increase in yield of 1%. Similarly, the Monterey treated trees yielded 18.1 lb (8.2 kg) per tree and the control trees 15.7 lb (7.1 kg), an increase of 15%. Two trials were conducted in older Nonpareil orchards in the northern Adelaide plains. Kelpak was applied at pints in 100 gallons water/acre ( L in 1000 L water/ha) at 0 to 50% bloom, and again 14 to 21 days later. Root density assessments on feeder roots at several depths showed improved rooting for the Kelpak treatments. Similarly, the Kelpak-treated trees showed an increase in fruit set of 10 to 20% above the control trees. The Kelpak treatment yielded on average 2% more kernel weight than the control (Table ), with 2% more nut meat on crack-out and a 14% increase in medium to large size nuts. These consistent trial results give sufficient proof that Kelpak is a useful tool to improve nut set and meat yields in almonds. The recommended use is 2 to pints/acre (2 to L/ha) applied as a full cover spray in 100 gallons water/acre (1000 L/ha), applied at 0 to 50% bloom and one to two additional sprays with 14 to 21 day intervals. Kelpak can be applied with most crop protection and foliar nutrient products. continued... TABLE Effect of Kelpak treatment on the yield of almonds in Australia TREATMENT 1 Kelpak 1 Improvement 2 Kelpak 2 Improvement KERNEL WEIGHT (lb/acre) 210 288 2960 18 +9% 2480 2780 2710 08 +9% CRACK-OUT (%) 27 29 +2% MEDIUM + LARGE NUTS (%) 6 54 +18% 49 59 +10% RECOMMENDATION FOR BEARING ALMONDS RATE TIMING 2 to pints/acre (2 to L/ha) applied as a full cover spray in 100 gallons water/acre (1000 L/ha) Apply at 0 to 50% bloom and one to two additional sprays with 14 to 21 day intervals

TABLE Effect of Kelpak treatment on the yield of almonds in Australia TREATMENT KERNEL WEIGHT (lb/acre) CRACK-OUT (%) MEDIUM + LARGE NUTS (%) 1 210 288 27 6 Kelpak 1 2960 18 29 54 Improvement +9% +2% +18% 2 2480 2780 49 Kelpak 2 2710 08 59 Improvement +9% +10% BACK

Hazelnut Two demonstration trials were done on Barcelona hazelnuts in Oregon, USA. Kelpak was applied approximately five weeks after bud break (early June) and again one month later (early July) at 2 L/ha (2 pints/acre). In a third trial, the Kelpak was applied at 4 L/ha (2 quarts/acre) together with a foliar nitrogen product. In all the trials the Kelpak treatments produced yield increases (Table 4). Two additional hazelnut trials were conducted with Kelpak applied at 2 L/ha (2 pints/acre), starting application earlier at end May and again in mid-july. The Kelpak treatments respectively yielded 11 and 17% more than the control. The average yield increase over all these trials suggests yield improvement above 10% with two Kelpak applications on hazelnuts. The recommended use of Kelpak on hazelnuts is 2 to L/ha (2 to pints/acre) applied approximately four weeks after bud break and repeated four weeks thereafter. continued... TABLE 4 Effect of Kelpak on Barcelona hazelnuts in Oregon TREATMENT Kelpak Yield increase TRIAL 1 2 L/ha; pts/ac (lb/acre) 2940 295 55 295 69 98 YIELD (lb/acre) 105 2 128 480 624 144 (lb/acre) 2500 00 800 2802 699 897

TABLE 4 Effect of Kelpak on Barcelona hazelnuts in Oregon YIELD TABLE 4 TREATMENT TRIAL 1 2 L/ha; pts/ac (lb/acre) TRIAL 2 2 L/ha; pts/ac (lb/acre) TRIAL 4 L/ha; pts/ac + N (lb/acre) 2940 295 105 480 2500 2802 Kelpak 295 69 2 624 00 699 Yield increase 55 98 128 144 800 897 BACK

Pistachio A trial on the pistachio variety Kerman on Atlantic rootstock was conducted in Merced County, California. Kelpak was applied at 50% bloom and petal fall, 40 days later at rates of 2 or L/ha (2 or pints/acre). Both treatments showed an increase in yield, with the L/ha ( pints/acre) significantly different from the control at an increase above 20% (Table 5). The current recommendation for Kelpak on pistachio is L/ha ( pints/acre) applied at 50% bloom and four weeks thereafter. Excellent increases in pistachio yield with both Kelpak treatments were achieved. The higher Kelpak rate of pints/acre ( L/ha) produced the largest increase in yield and return (Table 5). TABLE 5 Yield and return for Kelpak pistachio trial, California TREATMENT YIELD RETURN % INCREASE RECOMMENDATION FOR BEARING PISTACHIO NUTS (ton/acre) 2.72 609 ($/acre) 12 500 Kelpak 2 L/ha; pts/ac.1 7011 14 400 15 RATE L/ha ( pints/acre) Kelpak L/ha; pts/ac.8 7571 15 500 24 TIMING Apply at 50% bloom and four weeks thereafter

TABLE 5 Yield and return for Kelpak pistachio trial, California TREATMENT YIELD RETURN % INCREASE (ton/acre) ($/acre) 2.72 609 12 500 Kelpak 2 L/ha; pts/ac.1 7011 14 400 15 Kelpak L/ha; pts/ac.8 7571 15 500 24 BACK

Conclusion An overview of all the trials indicates that Kelpak improved yield by increasing the fruit set and retention in all these nut crops. Further trials on almonds, macadamia, pistachio and pecan nuts are in the evaluation process and will be reported on in due course. Kelpak is a cost-effective way of improving the yield of various nut crops. New nut orchards The use of Kelpak to reduce transplant shock and assist with the establishment of a strong root system is well known, and seedling root dips or nursery bag drenches are recommended for establishment of new orchards. Apply 0.5% Kelpak (500 ml Kelpak/100 L water; 2 pints/50 gallons water) as a nursery bag drench or dip the roots of bare rooted nursery plants in a 1% Kelpak and fungicide solution prior to transplant. Kelpak can be added to this treatment at 1 L Kelpak/100 L solution to replace the soil drench directly after transplant. To ensure strong development during the growth season, the root treatment is followed with monthly foliar sprays of a 0. to 0.5% Kelpak solution (00 ml to 500 ml Kelpak/100 L water; 1 to 2 pints/50 gallons water). For optimum results, Kelpak should not be diluted more than 1:500 (0.2%); the ph of the final spray mix should be lower than 7; Kelpak should preferably not be applied at intervals less than 14 days; Kelpak is compatible in a tank mix with most nutrients and pesticides; the use of a surfactant is recommended when applying Kelpak. This concludes our update report on the use of Kelpak on nuts from the Tech Desk. Our thanks to Wayne Sledge in Oregon, and Bill Ambaras and Vic Zabo in Australia for use of trial results. Please visit our website for more information on a wide range of crops: www.kelpak.com