Salmonella Typhimurium Infections Associated with Peanut Products

Similar documents
2008 Outbreak of Salmonella Saintpaul Infections Associated with Raw Produce

Salmonella Chailey outbreak associated with coconut, British Columbia, Canada, 2017

Salmonella: Was It the Tomatoes? Multistate Outbreak of Salmonella Saintpaul Infections Associated with Fresh Produce

Recall class Product Recalling firm Reason Brand Quantity almond I raw whole Hughson Nut Salmonella Enteritidis sold to Bulk Barn Foods stores

SALMONELLA ENTERICA SEROTYPE PARATYPHI B

Location Details References. milk contaminated with Campylobacter from Kinikin Corner Dairy cow share operation

E. coli O111 Outbreak Associated with Green Cabbage Served at Restaurants in Minnesota and Wisconsin - July, 2014

Dan Roehl. National Restaurant Association

National Outbreak of Salmonella Serotype Saintpaul Infections: Importance of Texas Restaurant Investigations in Implicating Jalapeño Peppers

Soft and Semi-soft Cheese made from Unpasteurized/Raw Milk in Canada Bureau of Microbial Hazards, Food Directorate, Health Canada

Salmonella Typhimurium Outbreak Linked to Restaurant Salad Dressing

Environmental Health Section

Conducting a Validation

Listeria monocytogenes Outbreak Associated with Sprouts

Outbreak of Salmonella Enteritidis, Athens County, May, 2010

Raw Milk Consumption: A (Re) Emerging Public Health Threat? William D. Marler, Esq.

Preventing Salmonella Contamination of Peanut Products. Michael Doyle

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX. on the traceability requirements for sprouts and seeds intended for the production of sprouts

Quantitative assessment of the risk of human salmonellosis associated with the consumption of tree nuts

Summer of Salmonella sorrow in South East Queensland. P Seal, S Peroni,

Sprouts A special problem

CAMPYLOBACTER IN MILK ( OR: CHERCHEZ LES CAMPYLOBACTERS IN MILK ) Eva Olsson Engvall

Haccp Manual For Institutional Food Service. Operations >>>CLICK HERE<<<

Thought Starter. European Conference on MRL-Setting for Biocides

Nut Recalls and Food Borne Illness Outbreaks in North America

Chair and members of the Board of Health. Jessica Morris, Manager, Environmental Health. Christopher Beveridge, Director, Health Protection

FDA Report Conference for Food Protection Boise, Idaho April 16, 2016

Developments in the legislation on food hygiene related with VTEC Kris De Smet European Commission GD SANCO, Unit G4 Food, alert system and training

Local Health Departments and Regional Offices of Illinois Department of Public Health

Food Safety Action Plan

FOOD ALLERGENS BEST PRACTICES FOR ASSESSING, MANAGING AND COMMUNICATING THE RISKS

2011 CLASS SCHEDULE THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW LEAFY GREENS

Food Inspection Violation, Anticipating Risk (FIVAR) Montgomery County, MD

1) What proportion of the districts has written policies regarding vending or a la carte foods?

ILSI Workshop on Food Allergy: From Thresholds to Action Levels. The Regulators perspective

Emerging Foodborne Pathogens with Potential Significance to the Middle East

Psa and Italian Kiwifruit Orchards an observation by Callum Kay, 4 April 2011

Table. Outbreaks from Unpasteurized (Raw) Milk and non- Mexican Style Raw Milk Cheeses, United States, *

IFPTI Fellowship Cohort V: Research Presentation Matthew Coleman, R.S., CP-FS

The University of Georgia

Grow Campylobacter and Similar Bacteria Using Less Oxygen. Mary Kay Bates, M.S. Global Cell Culture Specialist

North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Division of Public Health. November 25, 2013

May 16, First Lady Michelle Obama The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC Dear President and Mrs.

Louisiana Crawfish Action Plan

A Rapid One Week Response

Food Allergies on the Rise in American Children

DETECTION OF CAMPYLOBACTER IN MILK A COLLABORATIVE STUDY

MONTHLY COFFEE MARKET REPORT

CURRICULUM VITAE. Tricia Thompson, MS, RD. ( ) Boston, Massachusetts M.S. in Nutrition, 1991

Division of Hotels & Restaurants

cover foods sold in movie theaters, casinos, bowling alleys, stadiums, cafes in superstores, hotels, and airlines

Small scale fisheries Big contribution

Verification and Validation of HACCP Plans in U.S. Meat Processing Facilities

Gold Medal, Gold Medal Wondra, and Signature Kitchens Flour Recalled Due to Possible E. coli O121 Contamination

HACCP. Hazard Analysis Critical. For The Food Service Worker

On Jul 18, 2013, at 8:53 AM, "Buchholz, Annemarie" wrote:

INFECTION PREVENTION IN THE KITCHEN: KEY AREAS OF FOCUS FOR ENSURING FOOD SAFETY IN YOUR FACILITY

Division of Food Safety and Lodging June 14, 2010

Fairfield Public Schools Family Consumer Sciences Curriculum Food Service 30

Staff Contact: Allison L. Austin Telephone (703) Item Description Class

Where the subject may be perishable but the insight isn't.

EXPERTS AGREE HFCS IS SAFE AND NUTRITIONALLY THE SAME AS TABLE SUGAR.

Healthy Food Procurement in the County of Los Angeles Public Health Alliance of Southern California Leadership Council May 31, 2013

Michael Sheridan BSc., BEd., DipFinPl., GradDipEnvHth., MBiotech.

PUBLIC HEALTH BRIEF 2011 UPDATE HEALTHIER CHOICES IN SCHOOL VENDING MACHINES: SURVEY RESULTS FROM MAHONING COUNTY SCHOOLS

Appendix 2. Food Safety Plan Worksheets

Subject: ALFOODACT Nestle USA Announces Voluntary Recall of NESQUIK Chocolate Powder

Can You Tell the Difference? A Study on the Preference of Bottled Water. [Anonymous Name 1], [Anonymous Name 2]

Narrative. Description of Process. REVISED SEPTEMBER 2017 Commercial Processing Example: Wild Salmon Sushi Rolls

CCSB Contact: Allison L. Austin Telephone (703) Item Description Class

Background Population Exposure Estimates Using Salmonella Case Interviews

MBA 503 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

Policy on Managing Health Risk Associated with the Consumption of Sprouted Seeds and Beans

ILLNESS ASSOCIATED WITH EVOO RESTAURANT APRIL 17, 2009

Rural Vermont s Raw Milk Report to the Legislature

Growth in early yyears: statistical and clinical insights

Risk posed by STEC and other pathogenic bacteria in seeds and sprouted seeds

How LWIN helped to transform operations at LCB Vinothèque

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF WINE AND WINE GRAPES ON THE STATE OF TEXAS 2015

Ground beef. Contents. Contents.

REVISED 04/10/2018 Page 1 of 7 FOOD ALLERGY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act of 2004

Streamlining Food Safety: Preventive Controls Brings Industry Closer to SQF Certification. One world. One standard.

European Union comments for the. CODEX COMMITTEE ON CONTAMINANTS IN FOOD (CCCF) 4th Session. Izmir, Turkey, April 2010.

Dioxins&Furans 12 F 1 11 A 2 10 Q s

Tips. Some news d information..

Allergy Awareness and Management Policy

The Use and Misuse of Fruit Juice in Pediatrics

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD SAFETY AND INSPECTION SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC MELAMINE TESTING OF RETAIL MEAT AND POULTY PRODUCTS

Sustainability Initiatives in Other Tropical Commodities Dr. Jean-Marc Anga Director, Economics and Statistics Division

MEMO CODE: SP , CACFP , SFSP Smoothies Offered in Child Nutrition Programs. State Directors Child Nutrition Programs All States

The Gelatin Manufacturers Institute of America s (GMIA) Perspective on Melamine

The effect of ionized water on germination, sprouting vigour and microbial contamination of wheat sprouts

M I D D L E S E X- LON DON HEALTH UNIT

Treated Articles and their regulation under the European Biocidal Products Regulation

Problem Set #3 Key. Forecasting

Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation Division of Hotels and Restaurants. Program Overview. May 2015

Ideas for group discussion / exercises - Section 3 Applying food hygiene principles to the coffee chain

EWWR good practices and case studies

The Challenge of Using Regionalized LCA at Nestlé

Transcription:

The new england journal of medicine original article Salmonella Typhimurium Infections Associated with Peanut Products Elizabeth Cavallaro, M.D., M.P.H., Kashmira Date, M.D., M.P.H., Carlota Medus, Ph.D., M.P.H., Stephanie Meyer, M.P.H., Benjamin Miller, M.P.H., Clara Kim, Ph.D., Scott Nowicki, M.P.H., Shaun Cosgrove, B.S., David Sweat, M.P.H., Quyen Phan, M.P.H., James Flint, M.P.H., Elizabeth R. Daly, M.P.H., Jennifer Adams, B.S., Eija Hyytia-Trees, Ph.D., D.V.M., Peter Gerner-Smidt, M.D., D.M.S., Robert M. Hoekstra, Ph.D., Colin Schwensohn, M.P.H., Adam Langer, D.V.M., M.P.H., Samir V. Sodha, M.D., M.P.H., Michael C. Rogers, M.S., Frederick J. Angulo, D.V.M., Ph.D., Robert V. Tauxe, M.D., M.P.H., Ian T. Williams, Ph.D., and Casey Barton Behravesh, D.V.M., Dr.P.H., for the Salmonella Typhimurium Outbreak Investigation Team* ABSTRACT Background Contaminated food ingredients can affect multiple products, each distributed through various channels and consumed in multiple settings. Beginning in November 2008, we investigated a nationwide outbreak of salmonella infections. Methods A case was defined as laboratory-confirmed infection with the outbreak strain of Salmonella Typhimurium occurring between September 1, 2008, and April 20, 2009. We conducted two case control studies, product trace-back, and environmental investigations. Results Among 714 case patients identified in 46 states, 166 (23%) were hospitalized and 9 (1%) died. In study 1, illness was associated with eating any peanut butter (matched odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 5.3), peanut butter containing products (matched odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.7), and frozen chicken products (matched odds ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.7 to 14.7). Investigations of focal clusters and single cases associated with nine institutions identified a single institutional brand of peanut butter (here called brand X) distributed to all facilities. In study 2, illness was associated with eating peanut butter outside the home (matched odds ratio, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.6 to 10.0) and two brands of peanut butter crackers (brand A: matched odds ratio, 17.2; 95% CI, 6.9 to 51.5; brand B: matched odds ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 9.8). Both cracker brands were made from brand X peanut paste. The outbreak strain was isolated from brand X peanut butter, brand A crackers, and 15 other products. A total of 3918 peanut butter containing products were recalled between January 10 and April 29, 2009. Conclusions Contaminated peanut butter and peanut products caused a nationwide salmonellosis outbreak. Ingredient-driven outbreaks are challenging to detect and may lead to widespread contamination of numerous food products. From the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases (E.C., K.D., J.A., E.H.-T., P.G.-S., R.M.H., C.S., A.L., S.V.S., F.J.A., R.V.T., I.T.W., C.B.B.), and the Epidemic Intelligence Service (E.C., K.D., C.K.) and Preventive Medicine Fellowship (A.L.), Program Office for Scientific Education and Professional Development, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta; the Minnesota Department of Health (C.M., S.M.) and the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (B.M.) both in St. Paul; the Ohio Department of Health, Columbus (C.K., S.N.); the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver (S.C.); the North Carolina Division of Public Health, Raleigh (D.S.); the Connecticut Department of Public Health, Hartford (Q.P.); the Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa (J.F.); the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services, Concord (E.R.D.); and the Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD (M.C.R.). Address reprint requests to Dr. Cavallaro at ecavallaro@cdc.gov. * The members of the Salmonella Typhimurium Outbreak Investigation Team are listed in the Supplementary Appendix, available at NEJM.org. N Engl J Med 2011;365:601-10. Copyright 2011 Massachusetts Medical Society. n engl j med 365;7 nejm.org august 18, 2011 601

The new england journal of medicine Salmonella is a leading bacterial cause of gastroenteritis in the United States. 1 Outbreaks of salmonella infections have increasingly been associated with processed foods. 2-4 In November 2008, a cluster of 35 Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium isolates with the same uncommon pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern was detected in 16 states by PulseNet, the national molecular subtyping network for foodborne disease surveillance (Fig. 1). In late November, a second cluster of 27 Salmonella Typhimurium isolates, in 14 states, with two related PFGE patterns was identified. The two clusters had three closely related PFGE patterns, none of which had been previously identified in PulseNet. Since these clusters had similar geographic and age distributions, the PFGE patterns were grouped to define the outbreak strain (Fig. 1 in the Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org), and the two ongoing investigations were merged. In this report, we describe this nationwide outbreak investigation, identification of food sources, and implementation of control measures. Methods Case Definition Clinical salmonella isolates are sent to state public health laboratories for serotyping and PFGE subtyping with the use of restriction enzymes XbaI and BlnI and standard PulseNet protocols 5,6 ; results are submitted to PulseNet. We defined a case patient as a person with laboratory-confirmed infection with the outbreak strain of Salmonella Typhimurium infection that occurred from September 1, 2008, through April 20, 2009. Hypothesis Generation Local and state public health departments conducted routine case-patient interviews in November and December 2008 to gather demographic information and to record exposure histories. No epidemiologic links among cases or large focal clusters were initially identified. A standard hypothesis-generating interview, including questions about 471 types of possible exposures in the week preceding illness, was administered to case patients identified during late November 2008 to early January 2009 whom we were able to contact and who agreed to participate (Fig. 1). Exposures reported were compared with responses from healthy persons interviewed in the 2006 2007 FoodNet Population Survey. 7 Based on results from traceback and trace-forward investigations, additional hypotheses for suspect food products were explored. 8 Institutional Investigations Clusters of cases in institutional settings were monitored throughout the outbreak. An institutional setting was defined as a hospital, nursing or assisted-living home, long-term care facility, detention center, school, or similar setting. An institutional cluster was defined as two or more cases in an institution. Some health departments, including the Minnesota Department of Health, conducted intensive interviews at institutions, focusing on identification of common foods and trace-back investigations to identify foods served in common among institutions. A case control study of clusters in institutions was conducted (see the Supplementary Appendix). Epidemiologic Studies of Cases Not Linked to Institutional Clusters Two multistate case control studies were conducted during January 2009. For both, a case was defined as infection with the outbreak strain (on or after November 1, in study 1, or on or after December 1, in study 2) in a person who did not live in an institutional setting or have household members with diarrhea. Study 1 participants were not eligible for participation in study 2. Controls were persons without diarrhea who were matched to case patients on the basis of age category and neighborhood (see the Supplementary Appendix). 9 Food histories were taken in case patients for the week preceding illness and in controls for the week before the interview (in study 1) and the week before the matched case patient s onset of diarrhea (in study 2). All study participants provided oral assent. For the food history, in study 1, participants were asked about eating foods mentioned by a high proportion of respondents in hypothesisgenerating interviews, including peanut butter and chicken. In study 2, participants were asked about selected exposures on the basis of significant study 1 results, including peanut butter at home and away from home, roasted peanuts, 13 peanut butter containing product categories, and 5 frozen chicken products. For both studies, participants were asked about clinical history, institu- 602 n engl j med 365;7 nejm.org august 18, 2011

Salmonella Typhimurium and Peanut Products Dec. 29 Jan. 4 Feb. 19 22 Nov. 10 First multistate cluster identified Nov. 24 25 Second multistate cluster identified; epidemiologic assessment of first cluster began Dec. 2 Epidemiologic assessment of second cluster began Brand X peanut butter identified as common food among Minnesota institutions Dec. 22 28 First institutional clusters identified Salmonella found in brand X institutional peanut butter FDA began investigation of PCA facility in Blakely, Georgia, and learned of Plainview, Texas, facility Brand X institutional peanut butter recall issued PCA released statement informing customers to cease distribution and use of products Jan. 3 4 from the Georgia and Texas plants First multistate case PCA permanently closed control study (study 1) Feb. 2 5 Jan. 8 10 Outbreak strain confirmed in freshly ground peanut butter from Colorado health food chain and peanut meal from PCA Texas facility Jan. 28 30 Salmonella from peanut paste in tanker truck matched to outbreak strain; dog treats reported to be salmonella-positive PCA recall expanded; salmonella found in peanut paste from tanker truck; cases associated with freshly ground peanut butter identified Feb. 10 13 PCA Georgia facility ceased production and shipment of Salmonella from dog treats matched to peanut butter and peanut paste outbreak strain; PCA Texas facility recall issued and operations ceased; freshly ground peanut butter from Colorado health food chain reported to be salmonella-positive Nov. 2008 Dec. Jan. 2009 Feb. Nov. 25 Jan. 2 Hypothesis-generating interviews conducted Jan. 12 Study 1 results reported; outbreak strain confirmed in brand X peanut butter from Minnesota Jan. 13 Hypotheses expanded to include other peanut butter containing food vehicles; PCA found to produce peanut paste Jan. 14 Hold placed on brand A and B prepackaged peanut butter crackers Jan. 17 19 Second multistate case control study (study 2) Jan. 18 Salmonella found in intact packages of brand A peanut butter crackers Jan. 16 Outbreak strain found in unopened brand X institutional peanut butter; PCA and company X (producer of brand A and B crackers) announced recalls; International Health Regulation notice posted Health Alert Network advisory released Jan. 19 FDA began investigation of PCA facility in Plainview, Texas Figure 1. Activities Related to Implication of Sources and Regulatory Action during Multistate Outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium Infection Associated with Peanut Butter and Peanut Butter Containing Products, 2008 2009. FDA denotes Food and Drug Administration, and PCA Peanut Corporation of America. tional and noninstitutional exposures in the week preceding illness, and type, brand, and location of purchase and location of consumption for each exposure. Trace-Back Investigation State and local health departments and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducted traceback investigations of implicated food vehicles, inspected implicated facilities, collected environmental samples, and traced products forward from the implicated facilities through their use as ingredients in other food items. 10-12 Laboratory Investigation Food and environmental samples were collected from the homes of case patients, institutional settings with case patients, and implicated produc- n engl j med 365;7 nejm.org august 18, 2011 603

The new england journal of medicine tion facilities and tested for salmonella by means of standard techniques 13 (see the Supplementary Appendix). Statistical Analysis Statistical analyses were conducted with the use of SAS software, version 9.2 (SAS Institute). Exposure rates were compared between case patients and controls by means of matched odds ratios with exact 95% confidence intervals. Multivariable analysis was conducted for study 2 with the use of an age-adjusted model (see the Supplementary Appendix). Results Description of the Outbreak We identified 714 case patients from 46 states (Fig. 2) (also see the Supplementary Appendix). Dates of illness onset ranged from September 6, 2008, to April 4, 2009 (Fig. 3). Hypothesis Generation Among 86 hypothesis-generating interviews received from 26 states, 47 of 81 respondents (58%) reported having been exposed to institutional settings; 56 of 79 (71%) reported eating peanut butter; and 61 of 71 (86%) reported eating chicken. However, respondents reported eating many different types and brands of peanut butter and chicken products. Institutional Investigations During December 2008, the Minnesota Department of Health identified a cluster of five case patients residing in a long-term care facility (hereafter called facility A) and one case patient in another long-term care facility (hereafter called facility B), both in the same city, as well as two case patients attending one elementary school (Fig. 1). By January 9, 2009, six additional case patients who ate meals in six other institutions were identified. The Minnesota Department of Health and the Minnesota Department of Agriculture reviewed menus and invoices at these nine institutions and identified a common food distributor that distributed the same brand of peanut butter (hereafter called brand X) to all the facilities. Brand X was an institutional peanut butter brand produced by the Peanut Corporation of America (PCA) at their Blakely, Georgia, facility. An open tub of brand X peanut butter from facility A was collected for salmonella testing on January 5. Epidemiologic Studies of Cases Not Linked to Institutional Clusters Case Control Study 1 Study 1 included 65 case patients and 174 matched controls. On univariate analysis, illness was significantly associated with eating peanut butter and peanut butter containing products (Table 1). Illness was also associated with eating any frozen chicken products but not with any specific product; more than 10% of case patients did not report eating a frozen chicken product. Illness was not associated with eating peanuts or major commercial brands of jarred peanut butter (Table 1). Ongoing Hypothesis Generation Ongoing interviews indicated that a number of case patients were not residents of institutions or did not report eating peanut butter at institutions. On January 13, 2009, investigators in several states noted that many patients interviewed reported eating other peanut butter containing products, particularly two brands of prepackaged peanut butter crackers (hereafter called brands A and B). The same day, investigators learned that the Georgia PCA facility also produced peanut paste made from ground roasted peanuts, an ingredient in a variety of widely distributed peanut butter containing products, including peanut butter crackers. A second case control study was launched to examine exposures to peanut butter containing foods. Case Control Study 2 Study 2 included 95 case patients and 362 matched controls. Illness was significantly associated with eating any prepackaged peanut butter crackers as well as specifically brand A or brand B peanut butter crackers (Table 2). Illness was significantly associated with eating peanut butter outside the home and attending a school or other institution but was not associated with consumption of any retail brand of peanut butter, frozen chicken products, or other peanut butter containing products (Table 2). In an age-adjusted multivariate analysis, three exposures only eating peanut butter outside the home, eating any peanut butter crackers, and eating brand A or B peanut butter crackers were associated with illness (Table 2). Additional Investigations From January 30 through February 5, case interviews by epidemiologists at the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment identi- 604 n engl j med 365;7 nejm.org august 18, 2011

Salmonella Typhimurium and Peanut Products Infection Rate per 100,000 Population <0.1 0.1 0.5 0.51 2.0 2.1 3.5 3.51 5.0 5.1 9.9 10 Figure 2. Rates of Infection with Salmonella Typhimurium Outbreak Strain per 100,000 Population in the United States, According to State. As of April 20, 2009, there were 714 known cases. One case patient resided in Canada and traveled to the United States during the week before the onset of illness. fied seven case patients who consumed in-store ground peanut butter at different locations of a health food store chain (hereafter called chain A). Trace-Back Investigation Product trace-backs from institutions revealed that brand X peanut butter produced at the PCA facility in Blakely, Georgia, was distributed in bulk only to institutions and food service companies. A joint FDA and Georgia Department of Agriculture investigation at the Georgia PCA facility found multiple possibilities for salmonella contamination, including evidence of rain and other water leakage into storage areas used for roasted peanuts, practices that allowed for cross-contamination between raw and roasted peanuts, and uncertainty as to whether the peanut roaster routinely reached a temperature sufficient to kill salmonella. 12 Salmonella Typhimurium had been isolated from peanut paste at the Georgia PCA facility during routine product testing in September 2008. The study laboratory retested a sample of the peanut paste but was unable to isolate Salmonella Typhimurium again. This peanut-paste lot was shipped from the Georgia PCA facility to other states. The lots of roasted peanuts used to make this peanut paste were also used to make multiple lots of peanut butter. During routine product testing at the Georgia PCA facility from July 2007 through January 2008, salmonella of several serotypes had been isolated from a variety of peanut products; all positive products were retested, found to be negative for salmonella, and distributed. 12 Trace-back from Colorado chain A revealed that roasted peanuts for in-store ground peanut butter were purchased exclusively from a second PCA facility in Plainview, Texas (Fig. 1). This facility principally roasted peanuts for distribution and produced peanut meal used to make peanut butter and peanut paste. 11 No peanut butter was pro- n engl j med 365;7 nejm.org august 18, 2011 605

The new england journal of medicine 80 70 Brand X peanut butter recall First PCA recall PCA recall expands Illness onset PFGE pattern upload 60 No. of Cases 50 40 30 20 10 0 Sept. 6, 2008 Sept. 20, 2008 Oct. 4, 2008 Oct. 18, 2008 Nov. 1, 2008 Nov. 15, 2008 Nov. 29, 2008 Dec. 13, 2008 Dec. 27, 2008 Jan. 10, 2009 Jan. 24, 2009 Feb. 7, 2009 Feb. 21, 2009 March 7, 2009 March 21, 2009 April 4, 2009 April 18, 2009 Week of Illness Onset Figure 3. Infection with the Outbreak Strain of Salmonella Typhimurium in the United States, 2008 2009, According to Week of Illness Onset. As of April 20, 2009, there were 714 known cases. Some dates of illness onset were estimated from other reported information. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns were uploaded to PulseNet, the national molecular subtyping network for foodborne disease surveillance. PCA denotes Peanut Corporation of America. duced at this facility. Peanuts and peanut meal were transferred between the Georgia and Texas facilities, and products from the Texas plant were used to make peanut butter and paste at the Georgia facility. An inspection at the Texas PCA facility identified several sanitation problems that could have led to salmonella contamination, including rodent-accessible entryways, an unsealed air-handling system, and rain leakage into peanut storage areas. 10 Laboratory Investigation On January 12, 2009, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture laboratory isolated the outbreak strain in the open tub of brand X peanut butter from facility A. The outbreak strain was subsequently isolated from an unopened container of brand X peanut butter in Connecticut and an unopened package of brand A peanut butter sandwich crackers in Canada that were purchased in the United States (see the Supplementary Appendix). Approximately 315 food and environmental samples from 24 states and Canada were cultured for salmonella; the outbreak strain was isolated from 17 food samples (Fig. 1). All PFGE patterns defined as the outbreak strain were identified in one or more food items produced between August 21 and December 6, 2008. The outbreak strain was not isolated from environmental samples collected in the Georgia or Texas PCA facilities; however, other salmonella strains were isolated there (see the Supplementary Appendix). Control Measures Throughout the outbreak, multiple public advisories were issued, recommending that consumers avoid eating implicated peanut butter products. 14,15 On January 9, 2009, the PCA ceased production 606 n engl j med 365;7 nejm.org august 18, 2011

Salmonella Typhimurium and Peanut Products Table 1. Odds Ratios of Salmonella Typhimurium Infection in Case Patients vs. Controls in 12 States in Study 1, January 3 4, 2009, According to Ingested Food Item.* Food Item Case Patients (N = 65) no./total no. (%) Controls (N = 174) Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Value Previously frozen chicken products 18/52 (35) 23/161 (14) 4.6 (1.7 14.7) 0.002 Any peanut butter 43/63 (68) 80/168 (48) 2.5 (1.3 5.3) 0.007 Any peanut butter containing product 47/62 (76) 104/168 (62) 2.2 (1.1 4.7) 0.04 Applesauce 15/58 (26) 32/170 (19) 1.9 (0.8 4.2) 0.15 Pizza 20/55 (36) 47/172 (27) 1.6 (0.7 3.7) 0.29 Potato chips 22/58 (38) 81/167 (49) 0.7 (0.3 1.1) 0.27 Peanuts 11/61 (18) 63/166 (38) 0.3 (0.1 0.7) 0.004 * Previously frozen chicken products included chicken nuggets, chicken strips, and other breaded or stuffed chicken products. Any peanut butter containing product included jarred peanut butter and any baked or prepackaged food containing peanut butter. For previously frozen chicken products, 20% of case patients were missing exposure infor mation; for all other variables, less than 10% of case patients and controls were missing information. CI denotes confidence interval. and shipment of peanut butter and peanut paste at the Georgia facility; the PCA Texas facility ceased operations on February 10. Recalls expanded throughout the investigation, eventually encompassing all peanuts and peanut products processed at the PCA Georgia and Texas facilities since January 1, 2007 (Fig. 1). A total of 3918 peanut butter containing products from over 200 companies were recalled between January 10 and April 29, 2009. 16 Discussion This nationwide outbreak of human Salmonella Typhimurium infections was linked to the eating of contaminated peanut butter, peanut paste, and roasted peanuts produced at the PCA facilities in Georgia and Texas. This outbreak resulted in one of the largest food recalls in U.S. history and an estimated $1 billion loss in peanut sales. 17 Laboratory evidence indicated that cases might also be related to thousands of other food products containing PCA peanut paste and to freshly ground peanut butter made from PCA s roasted peanuts. Because many persons with salmonellosis do not seek medical care or are not tested, it is estimated that 16 times as many cases of illness occurred than were reported. 1,18 This outbreak illustrates the challenge posed by ingredient-driven outbreaks. Many food items made with the same contaminated ingredient may be involved, each with separate distribution channels and consumer bases. The investigation of focal clusters of cases in institutional settings, especially reviewing invoices for foods common among institutions, and rapid trace-back of the suspected food to the point of manufacture provided critical clues in this outbreak. Even after brand X peanut butter was implicated and recalled, ongoing case-patient interviews by local and state health departments revealed that many cases could not be explained by consumption of brand X peanut butter and raised hypotheses about other possible peanut butter containing vehicles. Traceback and trace-forward findings, product testing, and a second case control study were crucial to identifying other contaminated peanut butter containing products and to expanding recalls. After the recall of many products associated with the Georgia PCA facility, continued case-patient interviews by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment led to the implication of a product from the Texas PCA facility, which had not been previously linked to the outbreak. These findings highlight the need to continue interviewing case patients in an ongoing outbreak, even after one food vehicle has been implicated, and to continually refine hypotheses as more information is collected. Salmonella contamination can occur during many stages of peanut butter production. Salmonella introduced in the soil through the addition of manure or through irrigation can survive for months to years, contaminating peanuts growing underground; further contamination may occur during peanut harvesting, transportation, or stor- n engl j med 365;7 nejm.org august 18, 2011 607

The new england journal of medicine Table 2. Odds Ratios of Salmonella Typhimurium Infection in Case Patients vs. Controls in 30 States in Study 2, January 17 19, 2009, According to Ingested Food Item or Other Exposure. Food Item or Exposure Case Patients (N = 95) no./total no. (%) Controls (N = 362) Odds Ratio (95% CI) Matched Exact Odds Ratio Adjusted for Age Group (95% CI)* Peanut butter Peanut butter outside home 13/79 (16) 19/349 (5) 4.3 (1.7 10.6) 3.9 (1.6 10.0) Peanut butter at home 44/91 (48) 214/354 (60) 0.6 (0.3 0.9) 0.5 (0.3 0.9) Any peanut butter 64/84 (76) 221/340 (65) 1.6 (0.9 3.1) 1.5 (0.8 2.7) Single-serving packets of peanut butter 3/89 (3) 5/354 (1) 2.2 (0.3 11.5) 2.9 (0.4 16.0) Peanut butter crackers Any peanut butter crackers 54/82 (66) 56/356 (16) 9.1 (4.9 18.1) 8.0 (4.2 16.2) Brand A or B peanut butter crackers 42/82 (51) 21/356 (6) 13.0 (6.4 29.3) 13.1 (6.0 31.7) Brand A peanut butter crackers 32/82 (39) 11/356 (3) 18.7 (7.6 55.1) 17.2 (6.9 51.5) Brand B peanut butter crackers 13/82 (16) 12/356 (3) 4.1 (1.7 10.7) 3.6 (1.3 9.8) Other products Roasted peanuts 10/89 (11) 113/350 (32) 0.2 (0.1 0.5) 0.3 (0.1 0.6) Prepackaged peanut butter sandwiches 5/88 (6) 6/360 (2) 3.5 (0.8 15.6) 3.2 (0.6 17.6) Peanut butter cereals 8/91 (9) 13/359 (4) 2.3 (0.8 6.1) Ice cream or ice cream toppings with peanut 10/90 (11) 22/357 (6) 1.9 (0.8 4.5) 1.7 (0.7 4.1) butter Peanut butter containing sandwich-style 6/88 (7) 14/362 (4) 1.8 (0.5 5.2) 1.3 (0.4 4.1) cookies Peanut butter candy 22/82 (27) 114/344 (33) 0.8 (0.4 1.5) 0.8 (0.4 1.4) Nutrition bars with peanut butter 20/85 (24) 72/356 (20) 1.3 (0.7 2.4) 1.1 (0.5 2.1) Peanut butter pet treats 2/91 (2) 14/354 (4) 0.6 (0.1 2.7) Premade dough with peanut butter 3/87 (3) 8/360 (2) 1.6 (0.2 9.0) 1.1 (0.1 6.7) Peanut butter non sandwich-style cookies 12/86 (14) 51/352 (14) 0.9 (0.4 1.8) 0.9 (0.4 1.8) Peanut butter containing desserts 4/88 (5) 15/356 (4) 1.0 (0.2 3.4) Pretzels with peanut butter 2/90 (2) 11/360 (3) 0.7 (0.1 3.6) 0.9 (0.1 4.7) Other Attended an institution 45/94 (48) 127/359 (35) 1.9 (1.2 3.3) 1.4 (0.7 2.8) Visited an institution 10/93 (11) 43/362 (12) 0.9 (0.4 1.9) * Age groups adjusted for were 0 to less than 6 years, 6 to less than 18 years, 18 to less than 40 years, and 40 years or older. Three brands of peanut butter crackers were not statistically associated with illness. Peanut butter cereals, pet treats, desserts, and visit to an institution were not included in multivariable analysis. age by means of exposure to animal droppings or soil or water from transport equipment. 19 During commercial peanut butter production, peanuts are typically roasted at approximately 350 F (180 C), a temperature that should kill salmonella. 20 As roasted peanuts are ground into peanut butter, grinding generates heat of 71 to 77 C for approximately 20 minutes, which is not sufficient to kill salmonella. 21,22 Therefore, salmonella introduced after initial peanut roasting can survive. 23 The ultimate cause of contamination in this outbreak is unknown; at the Georgia PCA facility, rainwater leakage into storage areas, storage of raw peanuts near roasted peanuts, and possibly inadequate peanut roaster temperatures suggest that salmonella may have arrived on raw peanuts 608 n engl j med 365;7 nejm.org august 18, 2011

Salmonella Typhimurium and Peanut Products or was introduced in the facility and survived processing. Since peanuts and peanut products were transferred between the Texas and Georgia facilities, both of which had inadequacies on inspection, it is not possible to say where the contamination originated. Salmonella can survive in a low-moisture food such as peanut butter for at least 24 weeks 24 ; therefore, if postprocessing contamination occurs, salmonella may survive in peanut butter for its entire shelf life of 18 to 24 months. 24-26 Salmonella has caused long-lasting and highly distributed outbreaks in other low-moisture foods. 24,27 However, lack of moisture in food prevents multiplication, so large focal outbreaks related to the mishandling of these foods in one location are unlikely. Contamination of low-moisture foods is likely to lead to prolonged, dispersed outbreaks that may be sustained as long as production conditions lead to contamination. The duration of the outbreak and range of production dates among salmonella-positive food samples suggest that the outbreak strain may have been present in the PCA facilities for an extended period. The complex nature of this outbreak led to an iterative investigative approach (see the Supplementary Appendix). The first vehicle implicated, brand X peanut butter, was sold to institutions only and thus could not be specifically identified by patients, making it impossible to assess exposure without also reviewing institutional invoices. Questions about peanut butter consumption likely elicited information about peanut butter eaten at home rather than at institutional facilities. Study 2 implicated peanut butter eaten outside the home as well as a general preference for eating peanut butter and peanut butter containing products, but subjects could not recall brand names. The initial link between brand X peanut butter and the PCA was critical to uncovering connections among the other contaminated peanut-containing products. Since PCA peanut paste was an ingredient in thousands of diverse products including human food and pet food products, it was difficult to identify a specific suspect vehicle during hypothesis generation and in the case control studies. Although study 2 had sufficient power to implicate peanut butter crackers, it had limited power to implicate other individual products that most likely accounted for only a few cases. This outbreak was instrumental in refocusing national attention on food safety and spurring discussions about gaps in the food safety system and methods for establishing and enforcing basic preventive controls. The White House Food Safety Working Group was created in March 2009 to identify actions to improve foodborne disease prevention and strengthen surveillance and regulatory authority. 28 One such action was the launch of the FDA s Reportable Food Registry, which requires food industry officials to alert the FDA within 24 hours after the discovery that a food product has a reasonable probability of causing adverse health consequences in humans and animals; the registry is meant to enhance the FDA s ability to act quickly to prevent foodborne illness. 29 In the first 6 months after its launch, the Reportable Food Registry received 125 primary reports from industry and regulatory officials about 25 commodities; of these, 37% concerned salmonella contamination. 30 The Food Safety Modernization Act, signed into law January 4, 2011, is a positive step toward transforming the food safety system. Under the law, for the first time, the FDA has the authority to mandate food recalls, stop distribution of unsafe food, and require prevention-based food safety plans from domestic and foreign food suppliers 31,32 ; these actions are vital to preventing foodborne illness outbreaks. A successful food safety system for the future depends on adequate resources to ensure implementation of the Food Safety Modernization Act and continuing collaboration among regulatory authorities, state and federal public health experts, and industry officials. Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org. References 1. Scallan E, Hoekstra R, Angulo F, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis 2011;17:7-15. 2. Sotir MJ, Ewald G, Kimura AC, et al. Outbreak of Salmonella Wandsworth and Typhimurium infections in infants and toddlers traced to a commercial vegetable-coated snack food. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2009;28:1041-6. [Erratum, Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010;29:284.] 3. Foodborne outbreaks due to confirmed bacteria etiologies. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2007. (http://www.cdc.gov/foodborneoutbreaks/ documents/2007/bacterial.pdf.) 4. Multistate outbreak of Salmonella serotype Tennessee infections associated with peanut butter United States, 2006 2007. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2007;21:521-4. n engl j med 365;7 nejm.org august 18, 2011 609

Salmonella Typhimurium and Peanut Products 5. Ribot EM, Fair MA, Gautom R, et al. Standardization of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocols for the subtyping of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Shigella for PulseNet. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2006;3:59-67. 6. Grimont PAD, Weill F-X. Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars 2007. 9th ed. Paris: World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella. (http://www.pasteur.fr/ip/portal/action/webdriveactionevent/ oid/01s-000036-089.) 7. Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet). Population survey data. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006-2007. 8. Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response. Guidelines for foodborne disease outbreak response. Atlanta: Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, 2009. 9. Barton Behravesh C, Mody RK, Jungk J, et al. Outbreak of Salmonella Saintpaul infections associated with raw produce. N Engl J Med 2011;364:918-27. 10. Food and Drug Administration. Report of a Department of Health and Human Services/Food and Drug Administration plant inspection to the Peanut Corporation of America, February 4 6, 2009. (http:// www.fda.gov/downloads/aboutfda/ CentersOffices/ORA/ORAElectronic ReadingRoom/UCM114852.pdf.) 11. Food and Drug Administration. FDA s investigation of the Westco Fruit and Nut Co., 2009. (http://www.fda.gov/safety/ Recalls/MajorProductRecalls/Peanut/FDA s Investigation/default.htm.) 12. Idem. Report of a Department of Health and Human Services/Food and Drug Administration plant inspection to the Peanut Corporation of America, January 9 February 5, 2009. (http://www.fda.gov/ downloads/aboutfda/centersoffices/ora/ ORAElectronicReadingRoom/UCM109834.pdf.) 13. Bacteriological analytical manual (BAM): salmonella FDA. 8th ed. Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration, 1998. (http://www.fda.gov/food/ ScienceResearch/LaboratoryMethods/ BacteriologicalAnalyticalManualBAM/ ucm070149.htm.) 14. Resources for consumers and industry. Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration, 2009. (http://www.fda.gov/ Safety/Recalls/MajorProductRecalls/Peanut/ ResourcesforConsumersandIndustry/ default.htm.) 15. Investigation information for outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium infections, 2008 2009. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/typhimurium.) 16. Peanut butter and other peanut containing products recall list. Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration, 2009. (http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/ peanutbutterrecall/index.cfm.) 17. Peanut recall sparks large-scale food safety concerns. ThomasNet News, March 11, 2009. (http://news.thomasnet.com/imt/ archives/2009/03/salmonella-relatedpeanut-recalls-impact-on-manufacturersbusinesses-becoming-clearer.html.) 18. Voetsch AC, Van Gilder TJ, Angulo FJ, et al. FoodNet estimate of the burden of illness caused by nontyphoidal Salmonella infections in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:Suppl:S127-S134. 19. Doyle M. Preventing Salmonella contamination of peanut products. Presented at the USA Peanut Congress, Amelia Island, FL, June 21 23, 2009. 20. Multistate outbreak of Salmonella infections associated with peanut butter and peanut butter containing products United States, 2008 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2009;58:85-90. 21. Ma L, Zhang G, Gerner-Smidt P, Mantripragada V, Ezeoke I, Doyle MP. Thermal inactivation of Salmonella in peanut butter. J Food Prot 2009;72:1596-601. 22. Shachar D, Yaron S. Heat tolerance of Salmonella enterica serovars Agona, Enteritidis, and Typhimurium in peanut butter. J Food Prot 2006;69:2687-91. 23. Park EJ, Oh SW, Kang DH. Fate of Salmonella Tennessee in peanut butter at 4 and 22 degrees C. J Food Sci 2008;73:M82-6. 24. Burnett SL, Gehm ER, Weissinger WR, Beuchart LR. Survival of Salmonella in peanut butter and peanut butter spread. J Appl Microbiol 2000;89:472-7. 25. ConAgra Foods. Peter Pan peanut butter frequently asked questions. (http:// www.peterpanpb.com/frequently-askedquestions.jsp#faq10.) 26. Fialkow G. Canned good shelf life and stamped code decoder. Herndon, VA: Connection Experts. (http://www.y2kkitchen.com/html/can_code_decoder.html.) 27. Lehmacher A, Bockemühl J, Aleksic S. Nationwide outbreak of human salmonellosis in Germany due to contaminated paprika and paprika-powdered potato chips. Epidemiol Infect 1995;115:501-11. 28. President s Food Safety Working Group home page. (http://www.foodsafetyworking group.gov/home.htm.) 29. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: questions and answers regarding the reportable Food Registry as established by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007. (http:// www.fda.gov/food/guidancecompliance RegulatoryInformation/Guidance Documents/FoodSafety/ucm180761.htm.) 30. Idem. A new approach to targeting inspection resources and identifying patterns of adulteration: the Reportable Food Registry first reporting period: September 2009 March 2010. (http://www.fda.gov/ Food/FoodSafety/FoodSafetyPrograms/ RFR/ucm200958.htm#prim.) 31. Idem. Questions and answers on the Food Safety Modernization Act. (http:// www.fda.gov/newsevents/publichealth Focus/ucm238506.htm.) 32. Idem. Food bill aims to improve safety. (http://www.fda.gov/forconsumers/ ConsumerUpdates/ucm237758.htm.) Copyright 2011 Massachusetts Medical Society. receive the journal s table of contents each week by e-mail To receive the table of contents of the Journal by e-mail every Wednesday evening, sign up at NEJM.org. 610 n engl j med 365;7 nejm.org august 18, 2011