CAULIFLOWER TRIAL,

Similar documents
PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS. Department of Horticulture

0\ Horticuilture Series 609 January 1990

OHIO. SfA1E SWEET CORN CULTIV AR EVALUATIONS Richard L. Hassell Horticulture & Crop Science OARDC/OSU Wooster, OH '

EVALUATION OF SWEET CORN CULTIVARS

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

~culture Series No. 5~

West Virginia Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations 2014

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

varieties had marginally higher sucrose levels than Golden Jubilee (3.7 % vs 3.1 %) while the supersweet varieties had much

1973 SWEET CORN CULTIVAR TRIALS GREEN SPRINGS CROPS RESEARCH UNIT

Northern Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluation 2004

Department of Horticulture ~ The Ohio State University

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations in West Virginia

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Department of Horticulture The Ohio State University Ohio Agricultural Research &Development Center Wooster, OH 44691

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Northern Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluation 2005

Edamame Variety Trial Phone: Fax: Materials and Methods

Jennifer Fishburn Kelly Allsup University of Illinois Extension Horticulture Educators

EVALUATION OF TOMATO VARIETIES FOR MECHANICAL HARVEST. Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center. Northwest Branch, Custar, Ohio

Variety Name Seed Company Variety Name Seed Company. BHN 589 Seedway Mt. Merit Seedway. BHN 967 Siegers Seed Company Primo Red Harris Seed Company

2004 Garlic Trial in Northeastern Illinois

Performance of New Vegetable Pepper and Tomato Cultivars Grown in Northwest Ohio 2009

Pepper Research for Adaptation to the Delmarva Region 2017

Primocane Fruiting Blackberry Trial Results

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Edamame Variety Trial Report 1999

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

EVALUATION OF GRAPE AND CHERRY TOMATOES IN NORTHERN NEW JERSEY 2003

Carol A. Miles, Ph. D., Agricultural Systems Specialist 1919 NE 78 th Street Vancouver, Washington 98665

Pumpkin Variety Trial 2005

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Evaluation of 15 Specialty Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

CULTURAL STUDIES ON CUCUMBERS FOR PROCESSING 1979 and 1980 Dale W. Kretchman» Mark A. Jameson» Charles C. Willer and Demetrio G. Ortega» Jr.

GREENHOUSE TOMATO BREEDING SUMMER CROP 1988 FIELD EVALUATION TRIALS, WOOSTER W. A. Erb, N. J. Flickinger and J. Y. Elliott

2008 Kraut Cabbage Variety Evaluation

Spring Red and Savoy Cabbage Variety Evaluation 2013

2002 NEW JERSEY CHERRY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1 INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

osu 1986 VEGETABLE CULTIVAR EVALUATIONS * GREEN WRAP TOMATOES * FRESH MARKET STAKED TOMATOES * SUPER SWEET CORN * NORMAL SWEET CORN

Report to Pennsylvania Vegetable Marketing and Research Program and Pennsylvania Vegetable Growers Association

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2009

Slicing Cucumber Performance in Southwest Michigan

Selecting Collard Varieties Based on Yield, Plant Habit and Bolting 1

2011 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox and Phil Atkins Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Tomato Variety Observations 2009

2009 Great Lakes Vegetable Working Group Heirloom Tomato Project Summary Indiana

Hort Series No_ 670 December Specialty Crops Production and Marketing

Yield, Income, Quality, and Blotchy Ripening Susceptibility of Staked Tomato Cultivars in Central Kentucky

Midwest Vegetable Trial Report for 2018

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Jonathan R. Schultheis Brad Thompson Department of Horticulture Science North Carolina State University Hort. Series No. 187

Yellow Watermelon Variety Trial Introduction Materials and Methods

2018 Small Fruit Plant Sale Variety Information

Evaluation of Summer Cabbage for Tolerance to Onion Thrips. Christy Hoepting & Katie Klotzbach Cornell Cooperative Extension Vegetable Program

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

2002 NEW JERSEY MEDIUM ROUND HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1. Rutgers Cooperative Extension INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS

THE 2017 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Bacterial Fruit Blotch of Watermelon

Objective: To examine Romaine lettuce varieties for resistance to yellow spot disorder

Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2008

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C.

THE 2017 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Northern Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluation 2008

What Do you Get When You Mix Pumpkins, Cowpeas, Buckwheat and Mycorrhiza? Steven Kirk Field Supervisor

VEGETABLE CULTIVAR AND CULTURAL TRIALS

2017 Annual 4-H Plant Sale

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

Lack of irrigation in 2002 reduced Riesling crop in Timothy E. Martinson Finger Lakes Grape Program

rciion egelaihe D Sweet corn varieties tested

Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Materials and Methods... 1 Results... 2 Acknowledgements... 3 Table Seedless Watermelon Variety Trial:

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance

Pumpkin Cultivar Observation Trial, Indiana 2007

Evaluation of FŪSN ( ) on Umatilla Potato Production

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

ACORN AND SPECIALTY WINTER SQUASH VARIETY EVALUATION. Methods and Materials

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

Title: Control of Wild Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in 'Jubilee' Sweet Corn in the Willamette Valley, 1987.

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Schoolyard Edible Gardens

WATERMELON AND CANTALOUPE VARIETY TRIALS, PO Box 8112, GSU Statesboro, GA

2009 Watermelon Cultivar Trials

Weather Information Temperatures. Figure 1. Figure Normal Precipitation in inches 2012 Total Precipitation in inches

2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County

GRAIN SORGHUM. Tifton, Georgia: Early-Planted Grain Sorghum Hybrid Performance, 2012 Nonirrigated. 2-Year Average Yield

Bell Pepper Cultivar Evaluation, 2017

Opportunities for strawberry production using new U.C. day-neutral cultivars

2013 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Transcription:

Horticulture & Crop Science Dept. Ser. No. 653 Januacy 1996 CAULIFLOWER TRIAL, 1994-1995 Richard L. Hassell Horticulture & Crop science OARDC/OSU Wooster, OH 44691

:

CAULIFLOWER TRIAL 1994-1995 Dr. Richard Hassell Horticulture and Crop Science/OSU Wooster, Ohio This evaluation was performed strictly for a potential fall market. Cauliflower was evaluated at the horticulture farm in Wooster, Ohio. Soils at this location are a clay loam type with irrigation available if needed. There were twenty-seven cauliflower entries in 1994 and fifteen entries in 1995. Each entry was replicated four times. The plots consisted of one row, twenty-seven feet long and three feet wide. Cauliflower spacing was ten inches between plants and five inches between plants (1995 only). Transplants were first grown for four weeks in 288 plug trays. These plants were at the third to fourth true leaf stage of development. Weather conditions at the time of transplanting were mild with adequate moisture for transplanting. Upon completion of the transplanting, supplemental irrigation was applied in the form of a overhead solid set sprinkler system. Irrigation from that point on was not needed. Prior to head development, plants were sidedressed with 30 units of nitrogen using ammonium nitrate. Fall weather conditions were ideal for head development both years. Cool temperatures, light dews, limited rainfall, and very little disease pressure. Cauliflower heads were not tied for producing white heads. The reason behind this was to see if this practice was needed and to see if it was necessary for consumer exceptions. Ofthe twenty-seven entries in 1994, the top nine were as follows: Montavo (Rogers NK)- 67 days; Shasta (Rogers NK)-90 days; Silver Streak (Asgrow)-75 days; Sentinel (Petoseed)- days; PX536390 (Petoseed)- days; Candid Charm (Sakata)- days; Incline (Sakata)-90 days; Fremont (Royal Sluis)-75 days; and Mystique (Takii)-96 days. In 1995, a hard freeze occurred around November 6 at which time heads were no longer acceptable for harvest. Two cultivars were rated the best in 1995: Fremont (Petoseed) and Rushmore (Siegers). 1

Table 1. Environmental factors at each of the research facilities and grower operations. Rainfall Air Tem12~rature Long-term avg. COF) (in) Long-term avg.mm. avg. max. avg. min. avg. max. Month '94 '95 avg. (in.) '94 '95 '94 '95 '94 '94 Wooster May 1.84 4.54 3.90 41.3 46.7 67.8 69.7 46.5 70.6 June 4.28 3.05 3.95 56.8 60.0 83.2 83.2 55.5 79.4 July 2.08 3.57 4.16 61.9 62.9 84.5 85.5 59.7 83.6 August 5.00 3.28 3.65 57.0 65.2 80.0 87.8 57.8.0 September 1.24 1.06 3.15 49.1 47.7 75.0 74.1 51.4 75.6 October 0.55 4.77 1.91 39.7 44.1 65.1 64.8 46.4 57.4 2

Table 1. Plant and head characteristics of fresh market cauliflower grown in Wooster, OH 1994. Cultivar Source Days to harvest Head wt. (oz) Head dia. (in) Comments w Amazing Bejo Lateman Bejo Montano RogersNK Shasta RogersNK White Rock Martin Rispens White Cloud As grow Silver Streak Asgrow Sentinel Petoseed PX 536390 Petoseed Minuteman Petoseed Guardian Petoseed Starbrite Abbott & Cobb Yukon Sakata Cashmere Sakata 96 67 90 96 75 75 96 75 90 75 26.21 30.16 26.92 36.88 28.72 27.95 31.49 37.15 39.34 37.02 43.68 32.20 38.54 39.68 8.14 9.50 10.00 9.97 9.00 9.00 7.00 11.00 11.12 7.50 12.50 9.00 13.00 8.00 Small plants, no wrapper leaves, rough heads. Small plants, small heads, not worth harvesting. Large uniform heads, very early, heads are an attractive yellow color. Large plants, large uniform heads, excellent wrapper leaves, very attractive. Small heads, breakdown in heads. Small plants, smooth heads, no wrapper leaves, not real attractive. Short plant, but good wrapper leaves, very uniform, very attractive. Large plants, pink tint to heads, no wrapper leaves, very attractive. Excellent tall foliage with good wrapper leaves, heads not real big, but acceptable. Heads are rough looking, lots of off types, not acceptable. Off type heads, decay in remaining heads, not worth harvesting. Medium plant size, fair wrapper leaves, rough heads, not attractive. Large uniform head, but odd shaped, no wrapper leaves. Plants are very blue, heads are open with little coverage, tip burn on outer edges of leaves.

Table 1. Plant and head characteristics of fresh market cauliflower grown in Wooster, OH 1994.( cont.) Cultivar Source Days to harvest Head wt. (oz) Head dia. (in) Comments.!>- Candid Charm White Magic Incline Amazing Sierra Nevada Cumberland Fremont Andes Mariposa Polar Cap Mystique Snow Grace Sakata Sakata Sakata Johnny's Royal Sluis Royal Sluis Royal Sluis Royal Sluis Royal Sluis Ferry Morse Takii Takii 96 90 90 75 96 96 96 67 43.12 34.37 42.68 28.43 29.86 35.24 30.78 32.68 35.76 31.56 29.52 18.02 16.00 11.33 11.00 9.33 10.00 9.00 8.00 10.12 9.00 9.25 9.50 8.00 Large plants, big heads, heads are smooth with a bright yellow color. Large heads, excellent wrapper leaves, heads starting to decay. Large plant growth, excellent wrapper leaves, large uniform heads, very attractive. Small plants, small to big heads, no wrapper leaves. Small plants, small heads with breakdown in heads. Medium size heads, very uniform, no wrapper leaves. Large heads, excellent wrapper leaves with pure white heads, very uniform. Small plants, rough heads, not very attractive. Excellent wrapper leaves, small plants, not very uniform head size. Large plants, large open heads, not very uniform head size. Large plants, excellent wrapper leaves, very uniform head size and shapely, very attractive. No wrapper leaves, heads not uniform in size or shape, purple color in heads. Seeded: June 27 Transplanted: July 29 Plant Spacing: 3' between rows 10" between plants

Table 2. Plant and head characteristics of fresh market cauliflower grown in Wooster, Ohio 1995. Cultivar Source Days to harvest Ten inch spacin~ head head wt. dia. (oz) (in) Five inch spacin~ head head wt. dia. (oz) (in) Comments lj1 Bejo 1642 Fremont Cashmere *Rushmore Minuteman Whitepassions Ravella Bejo 1573 Fargo Icon Serrano Amazing FMX88 Bejo Petoseed Sakata Siegers Petoseed Sakata Petoseed Bejo Bejo Harris-Moran Siegers Bejo Ferry-Morse 77-80 77-80 77-80 77-80 77-80 77-80 77-80 84-90 84-90 84-90 84-90 84-90 95 44.60 8.13 43.43 8.00 39.87 8.00 55.24 10.00 32.40 6.00 47.02 9.00 38.93 7.00 39.67 8.00 36.40 8.00 39.67 10.00 47.29 8.00 43.91 8.00 35.38 6.00 22.70 4.78 Small heads, but thick, excellent coverage. 35.21 6.00 Medium size heads, fair coverage. 34.12 6.00 No coverage, heads are loose. 40.12 8.00 Heads are large with excellent coverage. Heads were hard to see. 22.50 4.21 Not uniform, large and small heads, some coverage. 33.42 7.00 Medium to large heads, excellent wrapper leaves, pure white. 29. 5.00 Small heads, very uniform, excellent coverage. 30.18 7.00 Medium size, very uniform, excellent coverage. 30.17 6.00 Lumpy heads, not uniform, excellent coverage. 35.12 8.00 Large, loose heads, no coverage. 39.42 7.00 Nice uniform heads, no coverage. 35.42 6.00 Medium size heads, no coverage. 28.75 4.00 Small heads, excellent coverage, not uniform. Cultivars Polarcap (Ferry-Morse) and Lateman (Bejo) were not harvested due to the shortness of growing time. Seeded: June 24, 1995 Transplanted: July 30, 1995 Plant Spacing: 3 feet between rows; 5 inches and 10 inches between plants.