Edamame Variety Trial Report 1999

Similar documents
Carol A. Miles, Ph. D., Agricultural Systems Specialist 1919 NE 78 th Street Vancouver, Washington 98665

Edamame Variety Trial Phone: Fax: Materials and Methods

1

Niche Market Dry Bean Variety Trial Materials and Methods

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Pea Vine Production and Marketing Study

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Slicing Cucumber Performance in Southwest Michigan

Yellow Watermelon Variety Trial Introduction Materials and Methods

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Evaluation of Organic Cucumber, and Summer and Winter Squash Varieties for Certified Organic Production Neely- Kinyon Trial, 2005

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

Primocane Fruiting Blackberry Trial Results

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

EVALUATION OF FOURTEEN TOMATO CULTIVARS IN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN Ron Goldy & Virginia Wendzel Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Organic Seed Partnership

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Evaluation of 15 Specialty Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

Title: Evaluation of Apogee for Control of Runner Growth in Annual Plasticulture Strawberries

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

2011 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox and Phil Atkins Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C.

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Ames Plantation, Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith. Interpretative Summary

Volunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat year two. Mark Thorne, Henry Wetzel, Drew Lyon, Tim Waters

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

Carrot Rust Fly Study

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS. Department of Horticulture

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Southwest Indiana Muskmelon Variety Trial 2013

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

Observations on Sunflower Rust in Nebraska and Management Efforts with Fungicide Application Timings

Klamath Experiment Station

2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary.

Pepper Research for Adaptation to the Delmarva Region 2017

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000

Results and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

What Do you Get When You Mix Pumpkins, Cowpeas, Buckwheat and Mycorrhiza? Steven Kirk Field Supervisor

EVALUATION OF GRAPE AND CHERRY TOMATOES IN NORTHERN NEW JERSEY 2003

2010 Report to the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

2014 Organic Silage Corn Variety Trial for Coastal Humboldt County

Michigan State University 2015 Seedless Pickling Cucumber Variety Trial

PERFORMANCE OF FOUR FORAGE TURNIP VARIETIES AT MADRAS, OREGON, J. Loren Nelson '

Spring Canola Variety Performance in Iowa 2007 Final Report

Report of Progress 961

CAULIFLOWER TRIAL,

2004 Garlic Trial in Northeastern Illinois

varieties had marginally higher sucrose levels than Golden Jubilee (3.7 % vs 3.1 %) while the supersweet varieties had much

Trial Report: Yellow Squash and Zucchini Spring and Fall Variety Evaluation 2015

Influence of fungicides and cultivar on development of cavity spot of carrot.

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

Midwest Vegetable Trial Report for 2018

0\ Horticuilture Series 609 January 1990

Research Progress towards Mechanical Harvest of New Mexico Pod-type Green Chile

Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015

EVALUATION OF SWEET CORN CULTIVARS

Report of Progress 961

Influence of Valor Timing and Rate on Dry Bean Injury at Scottsbluff, Nebraska during the 2009 Growing Season. Robert Wilson

2008 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR

Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations in West Virginia

REPORT to the California Tomato Commission Tomato Variety Trials: Postharvest Evaluations for 2006

1973 SWEET CORN CULTIVAR TRIALS GREEN SPRINGS CROPS RESEARCH UNIT

Tomato Variety Observations 2009

2008 Kraut Cabbage Variety Evaluation

Marvin Butler, Rhonda Simmons, and Ralph Berry. Abstract. Introduction

2014 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VAREITY TRIAL REPORT. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR

Watermelon and Cantaloupe Variety Trials in Southwest Indiana Nov

Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance

Vivekanandan, K. and G. D. Bandara. Forest Department, Rajamalwatta Road, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka.

Fall Pepper Variety Evaluation

WINE GRAPE TRIAL REPORT

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Productivity and Characteristics of 23 Seedless Watermelon Cultivars at Three Missouri Locations in 2011 and 2012

Transcription:

Carol A. Miles, Ph. D., Agricultural Systems Specialist 1919 NE 78 th Street Vancouver, Washington 98665 PHONE: 360-576-6030 FAX: 360-576-6032 EMAIL: milesc@wsu.edu URL: http://agsyst.wsu.edu/ Edamame Variety Trial Report 1999 Carol A. Miles, Dawn Youmans, Rei Nakatani, and Chuhe Chen Washington State University Cooperative Extension 360 NW North St. MS:AES01 Chehalis, WA 98532-1900 http://agsyst.wsu.edu phone: (360) 740-1295 fax: (360) 740-2792 Introduction In 1999, we conducted two on-farm edamame variety trials in Thurston County, Washington. One trial was located at Stoney Plains Organic Farm and the other at Zenflora Farm. Both of these small, organic farms are located in Tenino, Washington. We chose these sites because the owner/operators of the farms were interested in evaluating the production and market potentials of edamame in our region. The trial at Stoney Plains included all of the varieties we had available for testing, in addition to breeding lines from the Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center (AVRDC). The trial at Zenflora included ten varieties. Procedures and Methods Large Variety Trial (Stoney Plains) The large edamame variety trail was planted at Stoney Plains Farm on May 31, 1999. Prior to planting, blood meal was applied and incorporated as a source for nitrogen at a rate of 50 pounds of nitrogen per acre. Also prior to planting, edamame seed was inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japunium. Thirteen varieties and 21 breeding lines were planted in this trial. Table 1 is a complete listing of varieties and breeding lines included in our trials. The experiment had a randomized complete block design with four replications. Plots were double-row beds, 3 m (10 feet) in length, and the distance between bed centers was 1.5 m (5 feet). Seeds were spaced 7.5 cm (3 inches) apart in the row, and rows were spaced approximately 0.6m (2 feet) apart in the bed. The trial area at Stoney Plains Farm was 0.06 hectare (0.2 acre). Plots were mechanically cultivated for weed control once a month throughout the growing season. Hand weeding was performed to control in-row weeds once in June, twice in July, and once during the month of August. Plots were irrigated once a week with overhead sprinklers. The irrigation was done with the rate of one inch of water per application. Irrigation was dependent on the amount of precipitation received during the growing season.

Small Variety Trial (Zenflora) A small variety trial of ten varieties was planted at Zenflora Farm on June 8, 1999. The field was tilled and harrowed prior to seeding. Seeds were inoculated with Bradyrhizobium japunicum before planting. The experiment had a randomized complete block design with four replications. Plots were double-row beds, 3 m (10 feet) in length, and the distance between bed centers was 1.5 m (5 feet). Seeds were spaced 2.5 cm (1 inch) apart in the row, and rows were spaced approximately 0.6 m (2 feet) apart. Plants were thinned to a 7.5 cm (3 inch) spacing on July 29, 1999. The trial area at Zenflora was 0.05 acre (0.02 hectare). Plots were cultivated between rows with a mechanical wheel hoe twice a month throughout the growing season, once in July, and once in August. In-row weeds were controlled by hand. Plots were irrigated at least twice a week with a low pressure, trickle tape system for a maximum of six hours a day. The field received 0.32 inch/hour of irrigation (about 2 inches/6 hours). Irrigation was dependent on the amount of precipitation received during the growing season. Data Collection Edamame stand counts were recorded at both trial locations July 29, 1999. Flowering dates and pod fill were observed throughout the growing season. Harvest Plants from the center 1.5 m (5 feet) of each double-row plot were harvested for a total harvest area of 3 m (10 feet) per plot. Harvest began on September 20, 1999, and continued through September 29, 1999. Plots were harvested at optimum vegetable maturity. Damage due to frost was observed at the last harvest date. Plants were pulled by hand and pods were stripped from plants. Pods were sorted into three categories: 1) pods with two or more beans 2) pods with one bean 3) unmarketable Each category of pods was weighed. Table 2 and Table 4 are summaries of harvested pods. Category 1, pods with two or more beans, is the most desirable pods for marketability. Category 2, pods with one bean, is marketable but not desirable. Pods with one bean will contribute to total yield if the marketable product is a shelled bean. Category 3, unmarketable, includes those pods that were immature or damaged. One hundred pods were taken from category 1, pods with two or more beans, and these 100 pods were weighed. From these 100 pods, 25 pods were selected at random and the beans were removed. These individual beans were then weighed and counted. Table 3 and Table 5 illustrate the quality of beans from category 1.

Results Stoney Plains In 1999, the varieties White Lion, Butterbeans, Sayamusume, and Kitanosuzu produced marketable pod yields greater than 200 grams (0.44 lb.) per 3 meters (10 feet) of row. The varieties Lucky Lion, Sayamusume, and Kenko produced large pods where 100 pods weighed greater than 200 grams. The weight of 25 beans should be greater than 20 grams for the fresh vegetable market. In 1999, all varieties except Kitanosuzu met this criterion. The varieties Kegon and Sayanishiki did not mature, thus they were not harvested. Breeding Lines The line AGS 94027-18-1 produced the highest marketable yield. Lines AGS 91027-26-2, AGS 93037-15-1, AGS 329, AGS 91027-6-2-3, AGS 94027-3-1, AGS 94018-11-1, AGS 93028-25-1 all produced marketable pod yields greater than 200 grams (0.44 lb.) per 3 meters (10 feet) of row. The lines AGS 94028-12-1 and AGS 94035-21-1 produced the lowest marketable yield. Zenflora In 1999, the varieties White Lion, Butterbeans, Lucky Lion, Sapporo Midori, Gion, and Sayamusume produced marketable pod yields greater than 200 grams (0.44 lb.) per 3 meters (10 feet) of row. The varieties Yukimusume and Sayamusume produced large pods where 100 pods weighed greater than 200 grams. The weight of 25 beans should be greater than 20 grams for the fresh vegetable market. In 1999, White Lion, Gion, Misono Green, Yukimusume, and Sayamusume met this criterion. The variety, Sayanishiki did not mature, thus it was not harvested. Seed Harvest Plants at Stoney Plains were collected from early maturing AVRDC breeding lines on October 8,1999. Plants were placed in the drying oven at 60 F for three days at the Washington State University Vancouver Research and Extension Station. On October 18 th the seeds were cleaned, bagged, and placed in storage for the 2000 planting season.

Table 1. Edamame and breeding lines included in on-farm trials in Tenino, Washington in 1999 Variety Supplier Trial Location 1) White Lion Takii Stoney Plains and Zenflora 2) Gion Takii Stoney Plains and Zenflora 3) Lucky Lion Takii Stoney Plains and Zenflora 4) Kegon Sakata Stoney Plains 5) Shironomai Sakata N/A 6) Butterbeans Johnny s Stoney Plains and Zenflora 7) Sapporo Midori Snowbrand Stoney Plains and Zenflora 8) Yukimusume Snowbrand Stoney Plains and Zenflora 9) Sayamusume Snowbrand Stoney Plains and Zenflora 10) Misono-Greene Snowbrand Stoney Plains and Zenflora 11) Kitanosuzu Snowbrand Stoney Plains 12) Sayanisiki Snowbrand Stoney Plains and Zenflora 13) SB 1002 Snowbrand Stoney Plains and Zenflora 14) Kenko Seedex Inc. Stoney Plains 15) AGS 329 AVDRC Stoney Plains 16) AGS 340 AVDRC Stoney Plains 17) AGS 94015-10-2-7 AVDRC Stoney Plains 18) AGS 94016-14-1-1 AVDRC Stoney Plains 19) AGS 94016-11-2-1 AVDRC Stoney Plains 20) AGS 94017-8-1 AVDRC Stoney Plains 21) AGS 94018-11-1 AVDRC Stoney Plains 22) AGS 94018-53-1 AVDRC Stoney Plains 23) AGS 94018-56-1 AVDRC Stoney Plains 24) AGS 94027-18-1 AVDRC Stoney Plains 25) AGS 94027-3-1 AVDRC Stoney Plains 26) AGS 94028-12-1 AVDRC Stoney Plains 27) AGS 94035-21-1 AVDRC Stoney Plains 28) AGS 93028-25-1 AVDRC Stoney Plains 29) AGS 93037-15-1 AVDRC Stoney Plains 30) AGS 94043-1 AVDRC Stoney Plains 31) AGS 93043-12 AVDRC Stoney Plains 32) AGS 94043-14 AVDRC Stoney Plains 33) AGS 94044-1 AVDRC Stoney Plains 34) AGS 94044-5 AVDRC Stoney Plains 35) AGS 91027-6-2-3 AVDRC Stoney Plains 36) AGS 91027-26-2-5 AVDRC Stoney Plains N/A Variety not available at planting time and was not planted at either location.

Table 2. Weight (grams) of pods with 1 bean (standard deviation), pods with 2-3 beans, and the weight of unmarketable pods, from 3-meter-row of edamame grown at Stoney Plains Farm, western Washington, in 1999. White Lion 211.6 ab (147.3) 35.8 c (22.3) 5.0 a (2.1) Gion 197.7 ab (233.3) 40.5 bc (47.9) 5.3 a (3.7) Lucky Lion 183.2 ab (140.9) 47.1 bc (22.4) 10.5 a (15.1) Butterbeans 327.1 ab (149.8) 86.1 abc (45.9) 8.9 a (7.2) Sapporo Midori 138.3 b (151.9) 34.7 c (47.0) 8.4 a (15.8) Yukimusume 154.3 ab (116.0) 47.7 bc (59.9) 11.0 a (7.2) Sayamusume 202.2 ab (109.2) 47.1 bc (14.8) 3.4 a (0.6) Misono-Greene 154.9 ab (80.1) 36.5 c (20.7) 6.6 a (5.8) Kitanosuzu 225.9 ab (108.3) 26.5 c (12.1) 7.0 a (4.0) SB 1002 89.9 c (55.2) 8.4 d (5.8) 2.4 a (0.2) Kenko 95.3 c (54.5) 30.2 c (18.2) 3.6 a (0.5) Breeding Lines Pods w/ 2-3 beans SD Pods w/ 1 bean SD Unmarketable pods SD AGS 329 283.9 ab (189.6) 61.8 bc (44.7) 14.2 a (11.3) AGS 340 121.6 ab (167.4) 25.0 c (28.2) 6.3 a (9.5) AGS 94018-11-1 247.5 ab (31.3) 105.2 abc (38.1) 22.5 a (4.4) AGS 94018-53-1 158.2 ab (53.4) 97.9 abc (65.1) 20.2 a (17.1) AGS 94018-56-1 148.3 b (77.8) 103.8 abc (65.8) 31.9 a (5.0) AGS 94027-18-1 404.6 a (188.1) 145.5 ab (61.1) 52.2 a (13.9) AGS 94027-3-1 251.3 ab (227.1) 155.4 a (112.0) 51.5 a (30.7) AGS 94028-12-1 62.5 24.4 7.4 AGS 94035-21-1 89.0 23.8 1.0 AGS 93028-25-1 217.4 ab (133.3) 77.7 bc (50.8) 14.1 a (13.6) AGS 93037-15-1 299.5 ab (161.2) 58.5 bc (34.3) 9.8 a (4.6) AGS 93043-12 113.9 65.1 7.7 AGS 94044-1 129.9 49.4 38.4 AGS 94044-5 138.2 b (100.7) 59.6 abc (31.8) 51.3 a (25.9) AGS 91027-6-2-3 263.4 ab (112.1) 78.4 abc (33.5) 7.7 a (5.0) AGS 91027-26-2-5 305.1 ab (246.1) 82.8 abc (61.2) 9.2 a (7.9)

Table 3. Weight of 100 pods that were selected at random (standard deviation), weight of beans from 25 pods, and number of beans from 25 pods, for edamame grown at Stoney Plains Farm, western Washington, in 1999. White Lion 197.6 ab (31.8) 22.3 bc (2.5) 52.5 ab (3.9) Gion 188.6 ab (9.9) 23.2 bc (1.1) 53.3 ab (2.5) Lucky Lion 214.4 ab (34.4) 22.1 bc (3.2) 53.8 ab (1.3) Butterbeans 193.5 ab (10.4) 23.5 bc (1.9) 56.5 ab (3.3) Sapporo Midori 193.0 ab (38.1) 22.7 bc (9.4) 53.3 ab (13.8) Yukimusume 196.6 ab (5.2) 32.6 a (20.9) 54.6 ab (3.8) Sayamusume 266.7 ab (59.3) 29.2 a (2.2) 53.3 ab (2.1) Misono-Greene 198.3 ab (36.2) 22.0 bc (1.1) 54.8 ab (2.2) Kitanosuzu 121.4 b (68.2) 17.9 c (1.4) 56.0 ab (2.9) SB 1002 185.2 ab (12.3) 25.7 abc (2.2) 54.3 ab (2.9) Kenko 208.3 ab (46.9) 24.6 bc (1.3) 51.6 b (0. 6) Breeding Lines Wt. of 100 pods SD Wt. of 25 beans SD No. of beans/25 pods SD AGS 329 225.6 ab (1.3) 21.5 bc (1.3) 51.6 b (2.1) AGS 340 184.5 b (18.1) 24.0 b (4.5) 49.5 bc (8.6) AGS 94018-11-1 230.3 ab (55.7) 15.4 c (2.5) 48.3 bc (4.6) AGS 94018-53-1 309.5 a (177.2) 16.1 c (3.9) 50.5 b (3.0) AGS 94018-56-1 226.6 ab (25.6) 16.4 c (3.5) 49.5 bc (0.6) AGS 94027-18-1 213.7 ab (23.2) 17.1 c (3.5) 54.3 ab (2.5) AGS 94027-3-1 232.0 ab (38.1) 17.2 c (1.2) 52.0 b (2.2) AGS 94028-12-1 178.6 13.5 51.5 AGS 94035-21-1 25.5 51.0 AGS 93028-25-1 239.2 ab (6.5) 22.1 bc (2.8) 50.5 a (1.7) AGS 93037-15-1 201.6 ab (19.1) 23.6 bc (4.1) 47.3 c (6.3) AGS 93043-12 259.3 17.0 49.0 AGS 94044-1 145.3 15.1 54.0 AGS 94044-5 156.5 ab (21.7) 15.5 c (1.0) 60.5 a (0.7) AGS 91027-6-2-3 251.3 ab (46.6) 22.2 bc (1.2) 53.5 ab (0.6) AGS 91027-26-2-5 202.0 ab (11.2) 21.0 bc (1.1) 54.5 ab (1.7)

Table 4. Weight (grams) of pods with 2-3 beans (standard deviation), pods with 1 bean, and the weight of unmarketable pods, from 3-meter-row of edamame grown at Zenflora Farm, Western Washington, in 1999. Pods w/2-3 beans SD Pods w/ 1 bean SD Unmarketable pods SD White Lion 399.7 a (183.1) 78.8 a (43.5) 13.5 a (0.2) Butterbeans 225.9 ab (115.0) 75.2 a (44.0) 20.9 a (13.0) Lucky Lion 255.6 ab (108.2) 63.3 a (36.0) 8.3 a (3.3) Sapporo Midori 261.8 ab (136.4) 58.0 a (27.7) 10.6 a (2.6) Gion 202.7 b (85.8) 60.2 a (9.7) 14.8 a (6.8) SB1002 197.5 ab (144.9) 37.7 a (32.8) 5.3 a (5.4) Misono Green 129.7 b (96.2) 43.5 a (12.1) 8.0 a (4.7) Yukimusume 119.2 b (55.2) 38.2 a (6.6) 10.2 a (3.3) Sayamusume 220.0 b (91.3) 64.9 a (33.8) 9.2 a (4.2) Table 5. Weight of 100 pods that were selected at random (standard deviation), weight of beans from 25 pods, and number of beans from 25 pods, for edamame grown at Zenflora Farm, western Washington, in 1999. Wt. of 100 pods SD Wt. of 25 beans SD No. of beans/25 pods SD White Lion 126.8 a (66.7) 36.6 a (36.9) 57.8 a (4.6) Butterbeans 161.1 a (54.4) 16.2 a (5.1) 54.5 a (1.3) Lucky Lion 161.7 a (47.5) 19.1 a (6.9) 53.5 a (2.6) Sapporo Midori 140.0 a (70.1) 17.1 a (7.9) 55.3 a (3.9) Gion 177.8 a (21.8) 21.2 a (3.1) 53.0 a (1.4) SB1002 112.0 a (23.6) 14.1 a (11.2) 51.2 a (13.7) Misono Green 190.3 a (7.0) 22.9 a (0.7) 55.3 a (1.0) Yukimusume 200.9 a (7.4) 24.3 a (2.0) 54.3 a (2.1) Sayamusume 236.0 a (7.8) 27.1 a (1.9) 50.7 a (1.2) WSU Vegetable Research and Extension Agricultural Systems http://agsyst.wsu.edu/ Last update: 06/05/02 by Alison Strobel Copyright Washington State University, Disclaimer Comments or questions about this page: E-mail: milesc@wsu.edu