Carol A. Miles, Ph. D., Agricultural Systems Specialist 1919 NE 78 th Street Vancouver, Washington 98665

Similar documents
Edamame Variety Trial Phone: Fax: Materials and Methods

Edamame Variety Trial Report 1999

1

Niche Market Dry Bean Variety Trial Materials and Methods

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Pea Vine Production and Marketing Study

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

Carrot Rust Fly Study

Yellow Watermelon Variety Trial Introduction Materials and Methods

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Influence of Valor Timing and Rate on Dry Bean Injury at Scottsbluff, Nebraska during the 2009 Growing Season. Robert Wilson

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000

PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

Sugar-enhanced and Synergistic Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2014

Slicing Cucumber Performance in Southwest Michigan

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Evaluation of Organic Cucumber, and Summer and Winter Squash Varieties for Certified Organic Production Neely- Kinyon Trial, 2005

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001

2008 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS. Department of Horticulture

Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

0\ Horticuilture Series 609 January 1990

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

EDAMAME PNW525. PNW525 Page 1

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations in West Virginia

WINE GRAPE TRIAL REPORT

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015

Spring Canola Variety Performance in Iowa 2007 Final Report

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

2014 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VAREITY TRIAL REPORT. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR

Trial Report: Yellow Squash and Zucchini Spring and Fall Variety Evaluation 2015

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

What Effect do Nitrogen Fertilization Rate and Harvest Date Have on Cranberry Fruit Yield and Quality?

Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels

Klamath Experiment Station

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

2004 Garlic Trial in Northeastern Illinois

Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008

2014 Agrium AT Fertilizer Trial Glen R. Obear and Bill Kreuser, Ph.D University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Objectives

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Comparing canola and lupin varieties by time of sowing in the Northern Agricultural Region

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2004

2011 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox and Phil Atkins Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Volunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat year two. Mark Thorne, Henry Wetzel, Drew Lyon, Tim Waters

Evaluation of 15 Specialty Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

Organic Seed Partnership

University of California Cooperative Extension Tulare County. Grape Notes. Volume 3, Issue 4 May 2006

CAULIFLOWER TRIAL,

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary.

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2009

PERFORMANCE OF FOUR FORAGE TURNIP VARIETIES AT MADRAS, OREGON, J. Loren Nelson '

Midwest Vegetable Trial Report for 2018

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Do lower yields on the vine always make for better wine?

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C.

2013 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

EVALUATION OF FOURTEEN TOMATO CULTIVARS IN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN Ron Goldy & Virginia Wendzel Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

Report to Pennsylvania Vegetable Marketing and Research Program and Pennsylvania Vegetable Growers Association

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Ames Plantation, Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith. Interpretative Summary

Tomato Variety Observations 2009

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

Tomato Cultivar Evaluation in High Tunnels, Northern Indiana, 2017

EVALUATION OF SWEET CORN CULTIVARS

What Do you Get When You Mix Pumpkins, Cowpeas, Buckwheat and Mycorrhiza? Steven Kirk Field Supervisor

Western Regional Dry Pea, Lentil and Chickpea Trials

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

Irrigation of Sunflowers in Northwestern Kansas

NE-1020 Cold Hardy Wine Grape Cultivar Trial

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

Tomato Variety Performance in High Tunnels

Title: Evaluation of Apogee for Control of Runner Growth in Annual Plasticulture Strawberries

Primocane Fruiting Blackberry Trial Results

SOYBEAN INOCULATION TRIAL Bob Henson

Assessment of Specialty Potatoes for Powdery Scab Resistance

FORAGE YIELD AND SOILBORNE MOSAIC VIRUS RESISTANCE OF SEVERAL VARIETIES OF RYE, TRITICALE, AND WHEAT

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Effect of Inocucor on strawberry plants growth and production

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

SUNFLOWER HYBRIDS ADAPTED TO THE FINNISH GROWING CONDITIONS

Southwest Indiana Muskmelon Variety Trial 2013

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

2002 NEW JERSEY CHERRY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1 INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS

Effects of Cane Burning on Older Raspberry Fields. Tim Miller WSU NWREC

Vivekanandan, K. and G. D. Bandara. Forest Department, Rajamalwatta Road, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka.

Transcription:

1 Carol A. Miles, Ph. D., Agricultural Systems Specialist 1919 NE 78 th Street Vancouver, Washington 98665 PHONE: 360-576-6030 FAX: 360-576-6032 EMAIL: milesc@wsu.edu URL: http://agsyst.wsu.edu Edamame Variety Trial Carol A. Miles, Washington State University, Vancouver Research & Extension Unit 1919 NE 78 th Street, Vancouver, WA 98665 Phone: 360-576-6030 Fax: 360-576-6032 Email: milesc@wsu.edu We have been conducting edamame variety trials in southwest Washington since 1995. Eight varieties (Butterbeans, Envy, Gion, Lucky Lion, Sapporo Midori, Sayamusume, Shironomai, and White Lion) have been included in our trial almost every year while new varieties have been included each year. Edamame grow well in western Washington and the keys to production success include early maturing varieties, fresh and healthy seed, and adequate fertilizer and irrigation. Each year we obtain new seed from companies to plant in our trial, yet a consistent problem we have found over the course of our studies is poor emergence. Emergence has varied dramatically for varieties from year to year and the problem has not been confined to any one variety. Edamame seed does not appear to store well beyond one year, and fresh seed may be essential for good emergence and plant establishment. Materials and Methods In 2001, 18 varieties from 7 seed companies were included in an edamame variety trial at WSU Vancouver Research and Extension Unit (REU) (Table 1). The trial had a randomized complete block design with four replications. The field was tilled in mid-may and edamame were planted on May 18. Plots were 2 rows wide and 10 feet long, spacing between rows was 2 feet, and seeds were spaced 2 inches apart in the row. Table 1. Eighteen edamame varieties planted at WSU Vancouver REU, the companies that supplied seed, and the color of pod pubescence. Entry No. Variety Seed Company Pubescence color 1 White Lion American Takii White 2 Lucky Lion American Takii White 3 Gion American Takii White 4 Envy Johnny's Brown 5 Butterbean Johnny's Brown 6 Shironomai Sakata White 7 Kegon Sakata White to light brown 8 Kenko (SE-4) Seedex, Inc White 9 Shirofumi Fedco Seeds White 10 Sapporo Midori Snow Brand White on young and brown on mature pods 11 Yukimusume Snow Brand White 12 Sayamusume Snow Brand White and brown mixed 13 Misono-Green Snow Brand White 14 Kitanosuzu Snow Brand White 15 Sayanishiki Snow Brand White 16 Haruno-Mai Snow Brand White 17 Sayakomachi Snow Brand White 18 Bukers Favorite Nichols Light brown to white

2 The field was certified organic and was maintained accordingly. Plots were weeded as needed from June through August. Mechanical cultivation was used to control weeds between rows and hand weeding was used to control in-row weeds. Feather meal fertilizer (12-0-0) was applied in a side-dress application on July 5 at a rate of 375 lb/a (45 lb N/A). Overhead irrigation was applied once a week as needed, and total irrigation plus rainfall was 10 inches throughout the growing season. Plant stand was measured in 10 feet of row, and plant height was measured in mid-august, from 10 randomly selected plants in each plot. Measurements were taken from the base of the plant (soil surface) to the top node. Plants were harvested from the center 5 feet of two rows, for a total harvest area of 10 feet per plot. Pods were hand picked, sorted into categories (2-3 beans per pod; 1 bean per pod; and unmarketable), and weighed. 100 pods from the 2-3 beans per pod category were weighed, 25 pods were shelled, the number and weight of their beans were measured, and we calculated the weight of 100 beans. Results and Discussion All edamame varieties emerged 10-14 days after planting (DAP) (Table 2). Plant stand was recorded on July 10, 53 DAP, and varied significantly among all varieties. Stands of Kenko (0.7), Gion (5.7), Lucky Lion (9.2), and Shironomai (10.5) were extremely low. Mean DAP to first flower for all varieties was 63, and mean DAP to 50% flowering was 66. Mean plant height for all varieties was 35 cm (13.8 in), and Gion produced the shortest plants (23 cm, 9.1 in) and Sayakomachi produced the tallest plants (44 cm, 17.3 in). Pod pubescence color was observed at early pod set and at harvest. Most varieties had white colored pubescence (fine hairs on the pods) and three varieties, Envy, Butterbeans, and Sapporo Midori, had brown colored pubescence. Asian consumers expect edamame pods to have white colored pubescence, while Americans who are unfamiliar with edamame have no expectations regarding pubescence color. Pubescence color does not appear to affect flavor, however it should be considered when selecting a variety for marketing due to consumer preferences. Edamame were harvested from August 28 through October 9, 102-144 DAP, and mean harvest date for all varieties was 113 DAP. Six varieties were harvested 110 DAP or earlier: Envy (102), Haruno-Mai (104), Sapporo Midori (109), Sayamusume (110), and White Lion (110). Kenko had such poor emergence in this trial that it was not included in yield data. Sayanishiki did not mature and may be too late for western Washington. Mean yield of pods with 2-3 beans for all varieties was 727 g (1.6 lb) per 10-feet of row, and three varieties had yields greater than 1000g: Kitanosuzu (1285 g, 2.8 lb), Misono-Green (1228 g, 2.7 lb), and Butterbean (1088 g, 2.4 lb). Gion had the lowest yield (190 g, 0.4 lb) due to its very low number of harvested plants (4). Mean weight of 100 pods for all varieties was 276 g (0.61 lb), and four varieties had 100-pod weights greater than 300 g: Kegon (337 g, 0.74 lb), Shironomai (317 g, 0.70 lb), Sayakomachi (312 g, 0.69 lb), and Lucky Lion (303 g, 0.67 lb) (Table 3). Mean weight of 100 beans for all varieties was 60.5 g, and the varieties with the largest beans were Lucky Lion (74.8 g), Sayakomachi (67.9 g), and Gion (64.2 g). Table 4 summarizes the yield (g) of 2-3 beans per pod in 10 feet of row of edamame varieties included in our trial from 1995 to 2001. Mean yields were calculated where data is available for two or more years. The three highest yielding varieties on average were Kitanosuzu (811 g, 1.8 lb), Shironomai (743 g, 1.6 lb), and Butterbeans (661 g, 1.5 lb). Misono-Green was very high yielding in 2001 (1228 g, 2.7 lb) and repeated trials are necessary to determine if this high yield is consistent over years. Gion was high yielding most years, however yields were low in some

3 years due to low stand counts. Low stand count due to poor emergence significantly impacts yield and it the greatest problem that we have observed with edamame production in our trials. Table 2. Days after planting (DAP) to emergence, first flower, 50% flower, and harvest; plant height (cm); plant stand in July and at harvest, and yield (g) in 10-feet row. Emerg Plant First 50% Hrv Plt No. Wt (g) Wt (g) Wt (g) Variety DAP Stand Flw DAP Flw DAP DAP Ht (cm) Plts Hrv 2-3 bn/pd 1 bn/pd Unmrkt pd White Lion 13.0 38.0 57.7 62.5 109.5 36.3 36.7 644.3 189.5 163.6 Lucky Lion 13.5 9.2 60.7 64.0 118.0 27.9 10.7 569.6 180.1 61.3 Gion 11.5 5.7 65.7 69.5 117.0 22.8 3.7 189.9 62.9 63.5 Envy 10.5 33.7 55.5 61.7 102.0-28.3 755.1 260.1 160.6 Butterbean 11.7 35.0 64.0 65.7 115.5 38.1 29.7 1088.2 403.3 226.7 Shironomai 14.0 10.5 66.7 67.7 113.2 27.8 14.5 480.1 390.6 135.1 Kegon 12.2 23.5 73.5 75.0 141.7 28.1 21.0 845.6 409.4 130.3 Kenko (SE-4) 11.5 0.7 71.0 71.7 - - - - - - Shirofumi 13.2 24.0 62.0 62.7 110.2 37.6 20.0 648.9 270.4 116.5 Sapporo Midori 13.5 18.0 54.2 60.7 109.0 34.5 18.7 445.9 160.2 78.7 Yukimusume 11.5 29.5 59.0 64.2 110.7 36.3 26.2 741.6 299.6 211.0 Sayamusume 13.2 27.7 57.5 61.5 109.5 45.4 25.0 591.1 158.3 152.3 Misono-Green 10.7 34.2 61.0 63.5 112.0 40.0 42.0 1227.7 553.4 209.6 Kitanosuzu 11.5 50.5 57.7 62.7 116.0 33.7 40.0 1284.7 572.6 136.3 Sayanishiki 11.2 29.7 79.7 82.5 - - - - - - Haruno-Mai 14.0 25.7 54.5 60.5 104.0 31.9 22.2 603.1 130.0 158.5 Sayakomachi 11.5 29.7 59.0 63.2 112.0 43.9 21.5 790.7 329.80 137.8 Bukers Favorite - 25.0 66.0 70.0-34.8 - - - - Mean 12.2 25.0 62.5 66.1 113.4 34.6 18.6 727.1 291.33 142.8 P-value 0.8714 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0005 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0376

4 Table 3. Weight (g) of 100 pods; weight and number of beans from 25 pods; and weight of 100 beans. Variety Wt (g) 100 pods Wt (g) beans from 25 pods No. beans from 25 pods Wt (g) 100 beans White Lion 248.2 35.2 56.7 62.1 Lucky Lion 302.9 41.9 56.0 74.8 Gion 294.0 29.2 45.5 64.2 Envy 218.9 30.4 52.3 58.1 Butterbean 264.5 33.3 58.2 57.2 Shironomai 316.8 32.8 55.7 58.9 Kegon 337.4 30.3 55.2 54.9 Shirofumi 259.6 32.7 56.2 58.2 Sapporo Midori 262.7 35.5 59.7 59.5 Yukimusume 245.3 31.6 56.5 56.0 Sayamusume 292.2 36.4 61.5 59.2 Misono-Green 278.2 37.7 59.2 63.7 Kitanosuzu 275.5 36.4 57.7 63.1 Haruno-Mai 225.0 29.9 61.2 48.9 Sayakomachi 311.8 39.4 58.0 67.9 Mean 275.5 39.8 56.6 60.5 P-value 0.0022 0.6381 0.0098

5 Table 4. Marketable yield (g) from 10-feet row of edamame varieties included in WSU variety trials in southwest Washington from 1995 to 2001; mean for each variety for two or more years; and mean for all varieties each year. Entry 1995 1996 1997 1999 2000 2001 Average AGS91027-6-2-3 - - - 263 210-237 Bukers Favorite - - - - - - - Butterbeans 663 770 617 327 501 1088 661 Early Hakucho 495 120 468 - - - 361 Envy 332-379 - 478 755 486 Fiskeby V 631 61 - - - - 346 Gion 687 321 735 198 753 190 481 Kegon - - - - - 846 - Kenko (SE-4) - - - 95 778-436 Kitanosuzu - - - 226 923 1285 811 Lucky Lion 614 736 593 183 625 570 553 Mikawashima 202 - - 321 - - - - Misono-Green - - - - - 1228 - Sapporo Midori - 408 397 138 431 446 364 Sayakomachi - - - - - 790 - Sayamusume 699 - - 202 852 591 451 Sayanishiki - - - - - - - SB 1002 (Harunomai) - - - 90 341 603 345 Shirofumi - - - - - 648 - Shironomai 743 728 931-835 480 743 White Lion 810 731 585 212 324 644 551 Yukimusume - - - 154 529 742 475 Mean 630 484 558 176 583 727 522 WSU Vegetable Research and Extension Agricultural Systems http://agsyst.wsu.edu/ Last update: 05/22/02 by Alison Strobel Copyright Washington State University, Disclaimer Comments or questions about this page: E-mail: milesc@wsu.edu