SHEHUI KEXUEBAN 100732 100089 1 / / 2 / / / / 3 / / 2016-05-06 C912. 2 A 1671-7023201606-0094-10 94 1 2 /
30 6 3 / 3 / / 4 3 4 2. 1. 5 1 network 6 1 Field Kurt Lewin 95
SHEHUI KEXUEBAN 12 13 2 7 6 8 14 9 2 ego - centered networks personal order 10 3 1 / 11 15 3. 96 1 Levis - Strauss 2 3
30 6 12 1 / / 1 / 2011 97
98 SHEHUI KEXUEBAN 16 18 26 27 28 1 19 2 3 2014 20 10 985 211 21 22 23 2009-2014 2014 4 550 24 25 3 590 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 / / 8 9 1 1 = 23 2 = /4-6 3 = /7-94 = 1 2 3 17
30 6 Multinomial Logitistic Regression Model STATA10 1 1 2 3 1 1 3 443 1 52. 7% 47. 3% 23. 3 2 3 396 37. 4% 3 428 49. 9% 3 300 3 451 985 11. 2% 211 15. 3% 73. 5% 3 429 985 211 25. 8% 64. 1% 10. 1% 1 / = 20% / = 19% = 61% 3 462 2 1 / 1 99
100 SHEHUI KEXUEBAN 62% / 50% 1. 62 67% 46% 1. 50 1. 65 / 1. 46 / 2 logistic 1 2 3 / / / 0. 00257-0. 07276 *** 0. 00443-0. 03896 ** 0. 00245-0. 06333 *** 0. 005 0. 026 0. 006 0. 019 0. 005 0. 024 985 0. 10030-0. 00396 0. 13798 0. 05816 0. 09272-0. 00147 0. 169 0. 209 0. 182 0. 225 0. 169 0. 209 211-0. 20553 0. 45658 *** - 0. 29447 * 0. 39400 ** - 0. 20609 0. 45764 *** 0. 148 0. 168 0. 155 0. 177 0. 149 0. 169 0. 48293 *** 0. 82082 *** 0. 44701 *** 0. 66697 *** 0. 48664 *** 0. 80868 *** 0. 112 0. 160 0. 121 0. 170 0. 112 0. 160 0. 40281 * 1. 55076 *** 0. 42326 * 1. 34959 *** 0. 41157 * 1. 52229 *** 0. 210 0. 257 0. 229 0. 273 0. 210 0. 257 1 = - 0. 05899-0. 23600 * - 0. 06241-0. 26164 ** - 0. 07828-0. 21694 * 0. 097 0. 123 0. 104 0. 131 0. 098 0. 123 0. 50325 *** 0. 64387 *** 0. 52287 *** 0. 67362 *** 0. 51299 *** 0. 63331 *** 0. 113 0. 139 0. 122 0. 148 0. 114 0. 139 0. 37766 *** 0. 44010 *** 0. 48082 *** 0. 45601 *** 0. 37645 *** 0. 43930 *** 0. 097 0. 123 0. 111 0. 140 0. 097 0. 123-0. 00350 0. 06217 0. 02238 0. 05525-0. 09699 0. 15342 ** 0. 050 0. 063 0. 054 0. 068 0. 060 0. 075-0. 00023-0. 01169 *** 0. 003 0. 004-0. 01200 *** 0. 01163 ** 0. 004 0. 005 0. 47115 ** 0. 36261 0. 34567 0. 48189 0. 95210 *** - 0. 33169 0. 211 0. 629 0. 343 0. 581 0. 269 0. 648 3 007 3 007 3 007 0. 036 0. 040 0. 042 1 = / 2 3***p < 0. 01**p < 0. 05 * p < 0. 10 / / 2 / 0. 93 / / 7% 0. 79 21% / / / / - 0. 012 0. 988 1 / 2 3 1 2 3 1. 2% P = 0. 01 0. 00 0. 05 3 1 2
30 6 / / / / / / / 0. 99 / / 1% / 1. 012 / 1. 2% 1 2 3 logistic 4 / 5 / / / 0. 00417-0. 03453 ** - 0. 03870 ** - 0. 00417 0. 006 0. 017 0. 017 0. 006 985 0. 13233 0. 05869-0. 07364-0. 13233 0. 182 0. 225 0. 174 0. 182 211-0. 29577 * 0. 39032 ** 0. 68609 *** 0. 29577 * 0. 156 0. 177 0. 137 0. 156 0. 44808 *** 0. 66489 *** 0. 21682-0. 44808 *** 0. 121 0. 170 0. 149 0. 121 0. 42787 * 1. 33243 *** 0. 90456 *** - 0. 42787 * 0. 229 0. 272 0. 211 0. 229 1 = - 0. 08155-0. 24143 * - 0. 15988 0. 08155 0. 105 0. 132 0. 107 0. 105 0. 53272 *** 0. 66350 *** 0. 13078-0. 53272 *** 0. 122 0. 149 0. 116 0. 122 0. 47442 *** 0. 46656 *** - 0. 00786-0. 47442 *** 0. 111 0. 140 0. 115 0. 111-0. 06330 0. 17432 ** 0. 23762 *** 0. 06330 0. 065 0. 080 0. 065 0. 065-0. 00040-0. 01111 *** - 0. 01071 *** 0. 00040 0. 003 0. 004 0. 003 0. 003-0. 01089 ** 0. 01509 *** 0. 02598 *** 0. 01089 ** 0. 004 0. 005 0. 004 0. 004 0. 80546 ** - 0. 29734-1. 10280 ** - 0. 80546 ** 0. 391 0. 613 0. 541 0. 391 2 639 2 639 0. 047 0. 047 1 2***p < 0. 01**p < 0. 05* p < 0. 10 / 4 / 2 3 1 / / / / 14% / 19% 23. 6% 5 / / 1 101
102 SHEHUI KEXUEBAN 18. 4% 44. 1% / / / 16. 5% / / 1 / / 2 / / / 3 / / / / 3 / /
30 6 tationiran Social Context. International Journal of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Science 110. 16GreenhausJ. H. & PowellG. N. 2006. When work and family are alliesa theory of work - family enrichment. Academy of management review311. 17EdwardsJ. R. &RothbardN. P. 2000. Mecha- 1LinN. 2000. Inequality in social capital. Contemporary Sociology296. between work and family constructs. Academy of man- 2 agement review251. nisms linking work and familyclarifying the relationship 2011 5 18ColemanJ. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of 3BourdieuP. & WacquantL. J. 1992. An invitation human capital. The American journal of sociology 941. to reflexive sociologychicagouniversity of Chicago 19ParsonsT. 2007. The school class as a social system. Press. School and societya sociological approach to education. 4BourdieuP. 1986. The forms of capital R. Nice 20ParcelT. L. &DufurM. J. 2001. Capital at Trans. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education pp. 241-258. Social Forces793. 5BurtR. S. 2000. The network structure of social cap- 21 home and at schooleffects on student achievement. ital Research in organizational behavior22. 2009 2 6KnokeD. & YangS. 2008. Social network analysis 22 Sage PublicationsInc. 7FreemanL. 2004. The development of social network 2013 5 analysis A Study in the Sociology of Science. 23 8KilduffM. & TsaiW. 2003. Social networks and organizationssage Publications Ltd. 24 9ScottJ. 2007. Social network analysisa handbook 2013 1 2014 3 Sage. 24 10 2009 2 2004 25BianYanjie and Soon Ang. 1997. GUANXI Net- 11GranovetterM. 1973. The strength of weak ties. A- works and Job Mobility in China and Singapore. Social merican Journal of Sociology. Forces 753. 12LinN. 2001. Social capitala theory of social struc- 26 ture and actionnew YorkCambridge University Press. 2010 4 13 27HamiltonG. G. 1990. Patriarchypatrimonialism and filial pietya comparison of China and Western Europe. British Journal of Sociology. 14 28ZhanH. J. & MontgomeryR. J. 2003. Gender 2015 3 2005 And Elder Care In China The Influence of Filial Piety 15NaeijiM. J. &SafikhaniS. 2013. Measuring the and Structural Constraints. Gender & society172. Social Capital and its Relation with Entrepreneurial Orien- Social Capital of College StudentsConnotation Measurement and Differential Impacts on Employment ZOU Yu - chun 1 ZHOU Xiao - chun 2 1. Institute of SocialegyChinese Acarderny of Social ScienceBeijing 100732China 2. School of Social WorkChina Youth University of Political StueiesBeijing 100089China AbstractDeducing from the theories of field and social networkingthis study proposes that college students social capital ought to include both family - of - origin social capital component and campus social capital component. Accordinglycollege students social capital can be measured by reviewing family - of - origin social network and campus social network and corresponding embedded resources in them. Moreover this study distinguishes the two social capital components and finds that these two components have different effects on the students employment. Employments are categorized into three classesemployed self - employed/entrepreneurship continuous study for advanced degree either at home and abroad. We find that 1Campus social capital plays a role in choosing between employed and self - employed while family - of - origin social capital is irrelevant 2family - of - origin social capital increases the propensity of self - employed over continuous studywhereas campus social capital increases the propensity of continuous study over self - employed 3family - of - origin social capital increases the propensity of employed over continuous studywhereas campus social capital increases the propensity of continuous study over employed. In addition campus social capital always has greater impact than family - of - origin in magnitude in choosing employments. Key wordsfieldsocial networksocial capitalemploymentself - achieved resourcev 103