Applicant Equity Census Results - Summary Applicants, Offers, Registrants

Similar documents
Hamburger Pork Chop Deli Ham Chicken Wing $7.78 $5.06 $4.34 $3.38 $2.15 $2.26 $2.24 $2.70

Western Washington University

West Virginia Wesleyan College

November 9, Myde Boles, Ph.D. Program Design and Evaluation Services Multnomah County Health Department and Oregon Public Health Division

Date: April 15, Holly Henry From: Daniel DeVries Results from New York survey.

George Mason University

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Kean University 2003 Highlights

Southern New Hampshire University

Auburn University at Montgomery

Chicken Usage Summary

A C E. Answers Investigation 1. Review Day: 1/5 pg. 22 #10, 11, 36, 37, 38

Hamburger Pork Chop Deli Ham Chicken Wing $6.46 $4.95 $4.03 $3.50 $1.83 $1.93 $1.71 $2.78

Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute College of Human Sciences Texas Tech University CONSUMER ATTITUDES TO TEXAS WINES

Putting dollar value on whaling

KENTHOLIDAYS (S) PTE LTD Tel:

FAIRTRADE UNIVERSITY AND COLLEGE AWARD JOANNA MILIS EDUCATION CAMPAIGNS MANAGER, FAIRTRADE FOUNDATION JO KEMP PROGRAMME MANAGER, NUS

The People of Perth Past, Present and Future

ORIENTATION Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Academic Info. Ken Eng Director, AME Student Affairs

18 May Primary Production Select Committee Parliament Buildings Wellington

Questionnaire on Correlation between Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis and Dietary Factors

WACS culinary certification scheme

Timing is Everything: The Role of Time in Fast-food and Sit-down Restaurant Behavior

IMPACT OF TOWNSHIP CAPS ON TELONE USE IN CALIFORNIA

LAKE KEGONSA DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY

Wine Writers Symposium. Meadowood, February 19, 2014

Perspective of the Labor Market for security guards in Israel in time of terror attacks

A Comparison of X, Y, and Boomer Generation Wine Consumers in California

NSSE (National Survey of Student Engagement) Multi-Year Benchmark Report Combined Charts Samuel Ginn College of Engineering

Sportzfun.com. Source: Joseph Pine and James Gilmore, The Experience Economy, Harvard Business School Press.

Food Services Survey New Campus

CERTIFICATE PROGRAMS VITICULTURE AND WINERY TECHNOLOGY VWT 130 General Viticulture VWT 172 Laboratory Analysis

A FLOURISHING SUPPLY & BURGEONING CONSUMER INTEREST PRESENT AN OPPORTUNITY TO INNOVATE

Nutrition Environment Assessment Tool (NEAT)

DETERMINANTS OF DINER RESPONSE TO ORIENTAL CUISINE IN SPECIALITY RESTAURANTS AND SELECTED CLASSIFIED HOTELS IN NAIROBI COUNTY, KENYA

Weight The Reality Series

Consumer study on fruit - In depth interviews -

Interactions between Non-Discrimination Laws and Socioeconomic Status of Sexual Minorities

Consumption Behavior of Youth at Branded Fast Food Outlets A Case Study of Chandigarh

As part of the evaluation, the Committee s charge was to review and assess:

Rheem Shopping Center Survey

Chinese Food Culture Summer Program. Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China

Problem. Background & Significance 6/29/ _3_88B 1 CHD KNOWLEDGE & RISK FACTORS AMONG FILIPINO-AMERICANS CONNECTED TO PRIMARY CARE SERVICES

OREGON WINE INDUSTRY LABOR SURVEY Jeff D. Peterson, Ph.D. Linfield College

ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE FLORIDA CITRUS INDUSTRY IN

Roya Survey Developers Bil Doyle Brad Johns Greg Johnson Robin McNal y Kirsti Wal Graduate Consultant Mohammad Sajib Al Seraj Avinash Subramanian

The Food Environment in Elementary Schools. Lindsey Turner, Ph.D.

Rural Vermont s Raw Milk Report to the Legislature

Missouri State University

Industry Partnership Program

Pecan Production 101: Sunlight, Crop Load Management, Pollination. Lenny Wells UGA Extension Horticulture

Tania Page Interim Sector Head. +44 (0)

Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence

2018 CONVENTION & TRADE SHOW CALL FOR POSTERS & ORAL PRESENTATIONS

Local Food Action Plan Columbus City and Franklin County, Ohio Consumer Survey Summary. Overview

COLLEGE EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS Gallaudet University - Fall Comparison to 4-year, Private not-for-profit Institutions

For Better, For Worse 2

GENDER PARTICIPATION IN THE PRODUCTION AND MARKETING OF SEAWEED IN DAVAO DEL SUR, PHILIPPINES

Our Vision From Proposal

Medical Conditions Policy

Mastering Measurements

JCAST. Department of Viticulture and Enology, B.S. in Viticulture

Timmie s tops in customer satisfaction

Informing Wineries Tourism Decisions: Studies of Tasting Room Visitors and Wine Tourism Collaboration

A Profile of the Generation X Wine Consumer in California

2016 MOUNTAIN STATES IDEA EXCHANGE RETAIL RUNWAY FACT SHEETS

FOOTHILL VINEYARD NEWS

Long term impacts of facilitating temporary contracts: A comparative analysis of Italy and Spain using birth cohorts

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 942 million pounds, 4.7 percent above September 2013 and 0.2 percent above August 2014.

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 950 million pounds, 2.2 percent above April 2013 but 1.4 percent below March 2014.

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 1.09 billion pounds, 2.6 percent above December 2016 and 3.0 percent above November 2017.

JCAST. Department of Viticulture and Enology, B.S. in Enology

2016 Food Service Meet and Greet with Old Lyme Facilities

Mystery Shoppers Program. Engaging Consumers. Brad Johnson: Mystery Shoppers: Mystery Shoppers:

The changing face of the U.S. consumer: How shifting demographics are re-shaping the U.S. consumer market for wine

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

ASSESSING THE HEALTHFULNESS OF FOOD PURCHASES AMONG LOW-INCOME AREA SHOPPERS IN THE NORTHEAST

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 1.07 billion pounds, 1.7 percent above October 2016 and 5.2 percent above September 2017.

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 1.06 billion pounds, 3.3 percent above March 2016 and 12.7 percent above February 2017.

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 1.04 billion pounds, 3.7 percent above April 2016 but 2.1 percent below March 2017.

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 1.03 billion pounds, 2.3 percent above August 2016 but 0.7 percent below July 2017.

Teaching taste activities

The University Wine Course A Wine Appreciation Text Self Tutorial

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 1.05 billion pounds, 4.0 percent above May 2016 and 0.8 percent above April 2017.

U.S. Produce Imports from Mexico

Academic Year 2014/2015 Assessment Report. Bachelor of Science in Viticulture, Department of Viticulture and Enology

Sugar Tax: A kick start to a healthier lifestyle?

Perceptions of Privatization

Gender Gaps in Higher Education Participation

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 1.05 billion pounds, 2.8 percent above November 2016 but 2.0 percent below October 2017.

What do we know about fresh produce consumption

CHICAGO SEPTEMBER WASHINGTON DC OCTOBER BOSTON NOVEMBER 15-16

OFFICIAL CHILI CONTESTANT APPLICATION FORM

Consumer Responses to Food Products Produced Near the Fukushima Nuclear Plant

United Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley Community Needs Update:

All Adult and Youth cooks must sign up through the ICS website to be recognized as official ICS members.

15 TH TURKISH FESTIVAL & 9 TH TURKISH RESTAURANT WEEK FOOD VENDOR PACKAGE

Gender and Firm-size: Evidence from Africa

Volume 30, Issue 1. Gender and firm-size: Evidence from Africa

De La Salle University Dasmariñas

#611-7 Workbook REVIEW OF PERCOLATION TESTING PROCEDURES. After completing this chapter, you will be able to...

Transcription:

Undergraduate,2 1 1,00 3, 00 1, 1,3 1 1, 0 3, 01 2,2 1,00 3, 0 2,4 2 3, 1 2, 1 0 1,00,3 0 4, 1 4 1, 1.4 1...3.4.2 2..3.0 1..4.0..4 2.3.3 0.1 1..4.4 1.4 2.2. 1... 1. 1.1 2.2.1...2.1.1 2...0 1.3. 1.4. 3, 4,,4 2,0 2, 3,4 00 1, 1,1 1,4 1,01 0 1,3 3 1,03 4 2, 3, 1, 24 1, 2,3 3 4 1, 2, 3,2 1,0 3 1,4 2,0 3 1 2, 3,1 3,1 1,3 1, 2, 1 1,000 2, 0 3,02,0 1, 1, 4, 4 43 1,4.0...4.4 4.3 3. 0... 0..3. 4..4.2. 2. 4..1. 3...3.1.4. 2.1.1..2.1 4.3.3....0 2.1.. 4.3....3.2.2.1.3...2.1.2.2. 2.3.2.1 Non-Heterosexual 3 1 0 3 2 03 1 1,02 1 Orientation.. 4..0....4..0. 1....3.0.0 Gender other than 3 4 1 1 2 3 Birth Assigned 0. 0. 0. 1.2 1.0 0. 1.3 1.1 0. 1.4 1. 1.0 1. 1.4 1.1 1.2 1.0 $0 -$4, $,000-$4, $,000 or higher 2, 2,4 3,02 1, 1,4 2,1 4 0 1,1 43 02 3 2 4 1,2 1, 2, 0 1, 3 1 0 1, 1,4 2, 1, 3 3 1, 1,4 2, 1, 1 4 3,1 2, 4,0 2, 1,3 1, 3,1 1,1 4 1,2 4.2...2...4...0.2....4.0.2 2.1.0. 2 3....3.0.2.4.. 3.2..4... 2..3.2..4...4..4.0. 4...1..1.1.3.2...0.0 4..1 1,3 3, 3, 3 1 4 2,0 2,2 4 2 4 1, 1,04 2 1 2 0 0 2 2,00 1, 1 1, 1,4 1 2 3 2, 2,0 3 0 4 1,3 1,0 1 2 0 2, 2, 4 0 1, 1,01 0 1,4 3,3,1 2,0 3 2,1 3,0 1, 1,0 3..0.0.3. 3.. 4..1..0....0..4.2..3...0.0.2. 4.... 4...0.4.0...4....0.1. 4...0.3....2..2... 4..4 2. 3......1 4..0.0.. Greater than,000, 4 4, 3 1, 1 2, 2 1, 4, 1 2,02 2 1,0 4, 3 2,4 0 1,, 4 3,1 2 1,2 0,4,2 1 1,3 0.. 1..4.2..2....1.0 0.. 0..4 1.3. 1.4.. 1......3 4.4.4 4.. Respondents,1, 2,3 3,0 2,0 0,4 3, 1,,0 3,0 1,,3 4,0 1,,, 2, Population Surveyed,, 2,0,0 2,,0 Percent Responding.1.1...1.2.3.3.1...0 Nov 1 Yr 1 FT Headcount * 3, 4, 4,3 4, 4, 4,4 * New to Institution, Full-Time, First-Entry Undergrad, Deg Offers: Respondents with Offers Reg: Respondents registered Nov 1 // 1: PM Planning and Budgeting 1 of

Medicine 2 *** *** *** 1 *** *** *** *** *** *** 1. 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.3 *** *** 2 *** 3 *** 1 *** *** ***.1...0.4 1.3.0 1, 3 1,2. 4.3 4..2 0.0.4.1... 4.... *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 0.4 0.2 3 0 1,0 4 1 1 4 1, 0 1 1 4.4 4.4 4.3....0 4. 3. 3.... 4.4 4..3.2.2.1.4.4..3...2.2. 4. 4. 4...1 3.3..4.... Non-Heterosexual *** 1 *** *** *** *** orientation.2...3..4.3..4.2 Gender other than *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Birth Assigned 0.3 0.4 0. $0 -$4, $,000-$4, $,000 or higher *** *** 3 3 *** *** *** *** *** 3..2..1 3.4 3...1 00 4 2 2 4 4 1 1 0 1..1.4..0.3....4......4..2. 2. 1.2 4.4.4.2.2. 3.3..3.3....2.2....4. *** *** 1 *** *** 1 *** 1 *** *** 1..4.4..2..2.3 2 *** 20..1.4.2....0.....3.2 *** *** 2 *** *** *** *** *** *** 1.3.4.4 1.1 1.3.3.1 3 2 4 3 1 3 2..3......3...4..1..4.2.1..3.1.3... 1.1.4.4.0 Greater than,000 *** *** 2 *** *** *** *** *** *** 1.3.4.4 1.0 1...1 1,4 2 1, 0 1, 1, 1 1,..4. 2. 2. 0...2 0. 2.4 0...2 1. Respondents 1, 2,0 1, 1,1 2, 1 4 Population Surveyed 4,3 4, 4, 4, 4, Percent Responding.0..0..0...4 Nov 1 Yr FT Headcount * 0 0 0 1 4 * Full-Time,MD Offers: Respondents with Offers Reg: Respondents registered Nov 1 // 1: PM Planning and Budgeting 2 of

Education *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 3.3 3. 3. 3.4 3.2 4. 4..0 2. 2.3 3.2 2 0 3 0 2 4 1 3..0..2.2.4..1.1..3.1 1.3 1.3 0..3 2.. 4.3. 1.2 1.2 3.1.1 2.3.4.2.4 4. 1.. 1.0. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 1 3 1 0 3 4 4 4 0 2 3 0 1 2 2 0.. 3.2 2..1.2.2 1.2 1.2.0.3.3.4.3.3.4 2...3. 2.2 1.3.3 0...0 2..3.3 4.3.1.1 1.2...0.. 3.4.3.3 0.3 1.3.1 0.0.0. 1.1.0.. Non-Heterosexual 3 2 orientation.4.1.....3..4..2..0.....1 Gender other than *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Birth Assigned 1.0 1.3 1. $0 -$4, $,000-$4, $,000 or higher *** *** *** *** 1 4. 4.4 4.0..4.1 3...4..1 1.3 1 1 3 1 4 1 0 3 4 4 2 1 1 3 1 4..3.3 4.2...0..2..3.2..1.0... 4.2.. 4....3.0.3.0.0..4.0.3 3..1.2 4.2.3. 2..3.3..3..4.1.3.3.... *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 2. 2. 2. 3.4 3. 1.. 0 1 0 3 4 4 0 2 4. 2..1.4....0.2.2..4.3..0...0...3..1..2.4..4...0 3.1 1.1...0.2.0..0..... 1.4.4 2..0.1.0..2.3.1.3.2.2 2.....0...1 Greater than,000 *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 2. 2.4.4..1.0 4 2 4 2 0 0 3 3 4 2 2..1 1. 4.0 4. 3. 4. 3.1. 2.3 1.1.... 0.2 0.. Respondents 0 3 1 1 1 4 4 3 Population Surveyed 1, 1,4 Percent Responding..3. 1.4....2.4...3 Nov 1 Yr FT Headcount * 3 0 4 * Full-Time, year, BED Offers: Respondents with Offers Reg: Respondents registered Nov 1 // 1: PM Planning and Budgeting 3 of

Law *** *** *** *** 1 *** *** *** *** *** *** 2.3 1. 2.4 3.3 2.2 3.2 0. 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2.. 4...1.2...3..3..0..2..2.4 0...4. 1.2.1. 0..2....1.4.. *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** 1. 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.2 4 4 4 2 0 2 4 4 1 2 3 4 4 2 2 2 4 1 03..3.....1.......4.4 4.2 3.. 2. 2..2...2.1. 0.0...3.3..2.4... 0..3.3.0..2. 4.4 1. 1. Non-Heterosexual 3 1 *** *** 1 4 2 1 orientation.2.2.2...4..0.2.3.4.2.2...4 Gender other than *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Birth Assigned 1.0 1.4 1.4 0. $0 -$4, $,000-$4, $,000 or higher *** *** *** *** 2 *** *** 4.4.1.3.4. 4..4 3...2.0 4 4 2 4 1 2 3 2 2 2 4 1 1 1 4 2 3 4.0 2..2.1. 4. 4.2... 2.2 2.2.3.2 2 2.2. 3.2.. 3....3.1..4..1...1..1.4.2...4.3....3.0.2 *** *** *** 0.4.0.4.....1.2.1...0.1.2 *** *** *** 2 *** *** *** *** *** 1 2.1 2.1 3.2 2.4 2. 2...0.0 0 2 0 1 1 3 3 24 2 1 1 1 3 2 4 1 1 1 3.4. 1.0.3...0.1....1.4 1.1...0..2.0 3..3 2....1...3.4....0.4.2..2.3...2.4... 1..4 Greater than,000 *** *** *** *** 1 *** 1 *** *** 1 1. 2.1 2.4 3.3 2. 3.2 2. 2..2.0.0 3 3 0 4 2 1 0 0 0.4. 1. 2. 1..2 3.. 3. 1.. 0. 3.3. 0...2.1 Respondents 1,0 3 1 4 2 3 1,2 2 2 Population Surveyed * 2, 2,4 2,3 2,4 2, 2,2 Percent Responding. 3.2..3.. 2...0.1 Nov 1 Yr 1 FT Headcount 1 0 2 4 * Excludes Exchanges, LOP, transfer applicants Offers: Respondents with Offers Reg: Respondents registered Nov 1 // 1: PM Planning and Budgeting 4 of

Graduate 1 1 4 1 3 3 2 2 3 1,0 0.4.4 4.2 4.4 4... 0..0.. 4. 0. 4..1 0. *** *** 0. 1.2 1.2 1.1 0. 1.1 1.4 1.3 1. 1.3 2.4 2. 0. 1. 1. 1 1 4 2 0..1...... 1..1.4.4.3.3 4.3..2 1 4 2 2..3..4.3.....4.3.....4.. 3 4 1 4 1 1 3 1 4..0..3.3 1...3.2..1..1.4.0... 4 0 00 2 3 4 2..3.4...1...3.4.4 0..0..0.3.4 3 2 2 2 3 1,0 0. 4. 3.2. 3.4 4..3 0.0.. 4. 0.1 4.0.4.2. 0. Non-heterosexual 2 2 2 4 3 4 0 1 4 orientation.1......1.......4..4 1. Gender other than 1 1 2 Birth Assigned 1.3 1. 1. 2.1 2. 1. 1. 1. 1. 0. 1.3 1.3 1.0 1. 1.3 1.0 $0 -$4, $,000-$4, $,000 or higher 4 3 1 2 4 1 1 4 2 2 2 1 3 0 2 0 1 4 1 1 2 4 1 3 3 2 1,3 3 4 4 1 0 1 3 0.3.0. 4. 4....2.. 4..4...4...2. 1.1...3.3. 3.1..3.2 1..3 0..3.2 3.2..3 4. 3.3.1. 4....1 3...3 4..4.0.1..1.0.2 0...1. 4.... 4 3 1 3 1 4 1 3 3 1 0 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 12 1 0 0 4 4 2 4 1 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 3.3..0.3 2..4..2.3 2.1.4..4.4.... 3.1... 3.3...2...4.4.2.2..2 3..1..3.3 4.4. 1.4..3 2....4.0 1..2..0. 1..1... 3..4..4. 2....4 3.1..1....0..1. 1.0.2.2. Greater than,000 1, 4 3 0 2 0 4 3 1,0 4 1,4 2 04 4 2. 2.3 2.1 1.2.3 1. 3.. 0.1.4 2.4 2.4 0. 2.. 3.3 1. 2. 0. 0.2 1. 2.. 2. 2.. 1 4..4. Respondents 1,00 0 4 3 1,4 4 1,0 1,2 4 2, Population Surveyed 3,3 3, 3,2 3, 4,0 4,2 Percent Responding... 1.. 2..4..4.0 4.2.3 Nov 1 Yr 1 FT Headcount * 1, 1, 1,2 1, 1, 1,4 * Full-Time, Yr 1 Masters, Ph.D., Excludes Business Offers: Respondents with Offers Reg: Respondents registered Nov 1 // 1: PM Planning and Budgeting of

2024 © cuisinedocbox.com Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Feedback