Supplementary material: an empirical evaluation of two-stage species tree inference strategies using a multilocus dataset from North American pines

Similar documents
Need it faster? Use 2-day or overnight shipping! We re sorry, due to state laws we are unable to expedite shipping to AZ, MA or NJ.

State Individual Income Tax Rates

National Retail Report-Dairy

National Retail Report-Dairy

National Retail Report-Dairy

National Retail Report-Dairy

National Retail Report-Dairy

National Retail Report-Dairy

Differentiation in integrated health care policy approach an empirical analysis based on regional health life expectancy in China

PROFILE OF MARKET SERVED: Automatic Merchandiser. E-Newsletters. Marketing WEBSITE METRICS. Sessions Users Pageviews

Statistical Overview of the Canadian Greenhouse Vegetable Industry 2015

Gecko Hospitality Survey Report 2017

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement

Statistical Overview of the Canadian Maple Industry 2014

Recipe for the Northwest

RAFFLE PLANTS DOOR PRIZES FREE PLANTS. Presented by Donna and Robert Ellis

Statistical Overview of the 2015 Canadian Fruit Industry

Reasons for the study

BRD BREWERS RESOURCE DIRECTORY

RAFFLE PLANTS DOOR PRIZES FREE PLANTS. Presented by Donna and Robert Ellis

BRD BREWERS RESOURCE DIRECTORY

Statistical Overview of the Canadian Fruit Industry 2013

White Pine Blister Rust in California: Ecology and Conservation

Statistical Overview of the 2015 Canadian Fruit Industry

Statistical Overview of the Canadian Vegetable Industry 2012

Table of Contents 2010 OMS TITLE IN ALL CAPS

2015 DRY BEAN STATISTICS 2015 PRODUCTION AND CARRYOVER ESTIMATES

New England Middle Atlantic Region

State Licensing of Wine Sales in Food Stores: Impact on Existing Liquor Stores

Fruit and Vegetable TRUCK RATE REPORT

The State of the Craft Beer Raw Material Supply Sector; or Beer, Hops and Barley

Certified Organic Survey 2016 Summary

Bob Dickey. Bob Dickey. President, National Corn Growers Association Corn Grower from Laurel, Nebraska

Benchmarking and Best Practices Survey Results

Specialty Crops TRUCK RATE REPORT

DATA AND ASSUMPTIONS (TAX CALCULATOR REVISION, MARCH 2017)

FIRST MIDTERM EXAM. Economics 452 International Trade Theory and Policy Fall 2010

RAFFLE PLANTS DOOR PRIZES FREE PLANTS. Presented by Donna and Robert Ellis

NABCA Releases Control States Nine-Liter Spirits Sales for December

photograph Jeff Bisbee

SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM Fun food, not junk food for healthier fundraising

Withdrawn Certificates as of May 2018

The effect of wine culture on the price-consumption relation

Three aspects of resistance to white pine blister rust in California

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 982 million pounds, 4.2 percent above February 2017 but 10.5 percent below January 2018.

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 1.06 billion pounds, 3.1 percent above September 2017 but 2.0 percent below August 2018.

Principal components analysis of morphological variation of the Ptelea trifoliata species complex

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 1.10 billion pounds, 2.7 percent above March 2017 and 11.6 percent above February 2018.

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 1.07 billion pounds, 0.9 percent above April 2017 but 3.7 percent below March 2018.

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 1.08 billion pounds, 2.8 percent above August 2017 but 0.7 percent below July 2018.

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 1.12 billion pounds, 3.0 percent above October 2017 and 6.1 percent above September 2018.

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 1.09 billion pounds, 1.4 percent above May 2017 and 1.7 percent above April 2018.

Coca-Cola beverages bring a refreshing taste to consumers.

Regions of the United States

Fodor's Usa Broderbund Edition. READ ONLINE

Grain Stocks. Corn Stocks Up 1 Percent from June 2017 Soybean Stocks Up 26 Percent All Wheat Stocks Down 7 Percent

NABCA Releases Control States Nine-Liter Spirits Sales for March Control State results for nine-liter beverage sales for March 2017

Potatoes 2011 Summary

USA INTERNET AND SOCIAL MEDIA REPORT Usage of Internet and social media among US wine consumers

SPRING WHEAT FUTURES AND OPTIONS

Grain Stocks. Corn Stocks Up 15 Percent from June 2014 Soybean Stocks Up 54 Percent All Wheat Stocks Up 28 Percent

Potatoes 2014 Summary

School milk programmes: A joint FAO/IDF global review. Dr Judith Bryans

1 st Canadian Wine Sommelier Championship in Greater China. Introduction to Canadian Wine August 2017

Alberta Foodservice Forecast

Canadian Dry Bean Growing Regions

NABCA Releases Control States Nine-Liter Spirits Sales for September

2018 U.S. Dry Bean and Chickpea Planting and Production Estimates August Dry Beans and Chickpeas, Planted Area (in hectares)

Crop Production. Cotton Production Down 1 Percent from November Forecast Orange Production Down 1 Percent from October Forecast

Costco liquor store calgary flyer

RAISE THE BAR Progress Report

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 1.08 billion pounds, 1.0 percent above November 2017 but 4.3 percent below October 2018.

Chapter Ten. Alcoholic Beverages. 1. Article 402 (Right of Entry and Exit) does not apply to this Chapter.

A Snapshot of the Canadian Fruit Industry, 2009

Classroom Observer 10.

Honorable Members of the U.S. House of Representatives:

An Economic Analysis of Producing Carrots in the Red River Valley

Specialty Crops TRUCK RATE REPORT

SUMMER WORK 2018 AP Human Geography Ms. Sommer Mahoney 11;

welcome Fluid Rib & Steak Grill House is a unique Diner experience that you and your family are sure to enjoy! We only get better with age!!!

The Effect of Transportation Hubs in the Canadian Economic Context

Overview of Bob Bors Sabbatical July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009

LOCALLY GROWN VEGETABLES. July 20, peppers, cucumbers and collard greens

Total cheese output (excluding cottage cheese) was 1.09 billion pounds, 1.2 percent below December 2017 but 1.0 percent above November 2018.

World Beer Cup Overview

Apples. References: New York Apple Association, Rutgers University, University of Georgia, Washington Apple Commission.

Chapter VIII.-CONVERSION FACTORS

2014 U.S. Dry Bean Outlook

DELIVERING REFRESHING SOFT DRINKS

Grapevine Red Blotch Disease:

Onions for All Seasons and Tastes. Domestic Onion Production. Spring/Summer Fresh Onions. Fall/Winter Storage Onions. The Color of Onions

JUNPERUS VIRGINIANA IN THE SERRANIAS DEL BURRO MOUNTAINS, COAHUILA, MEXICO: A PLEISTOCENE RELICT

2016 MOUNTAIN STATES IDEA EXCHANGE RETAIL RUNWAY FACT SHEETS

RAFFLE PLANTS DOOR PRIZES FREE PLANTS. Presented by Donna and Robert Ellis

JOURNAL OF THE ARNOLD ARBORETUM

National Illicit Drug Prices

Meal Ideas FROM ANNE LINDSAY

PHILIPPINES. 1. Market Trends: Import Items Change in % Major Sources in %

Pledge of Quality and Origin. (Company Name) VeRUS Pet Foods (Address) P O BOX 239 ABINGDON MD (Website)

By Leland Graham, Ph.D. and Isabelle McCoy, M.Ed.

Transcription:

Supplementary material: an empirical evaluation of two-stage species tree inference strategies using a multilocus dataset from North American pines Michael DeGiorgio 1, John Syring 3, Andrew J. Eckert 4, Aaron I. Liston 5, Richard Cronn 6, David B. Neale 7, and Noah A. Rosenberg 8 November 25, 2013 1

Table S1: Phylogenetic inference strategies Index Species tree inference Gene tree inference Outgroup species Concatenation Strictly topology-based method method or consensus 1 Concatenation ML P. gerardiana Concatenation No 2 Concatenation ML P. bungeana Concatenation No 3 Concatenation ML P. squamata Concatenation No 4 Concatenation MP P. gerardiana Concatenation No 5 Concatenation MP P. bungeana Concatenation No 6 Concatenation MP P. squamata Concatenation No 7 Concatenation NJ P. gerardiana Concatenation No 8 Concatenation NJ P. bungeana Concatenation No 9 Concatenation NJ P. squamata Concatenation No 10 Concatenation M P. gerardiana Concatenation No 11 Concatenation M P. bungeana Concatenation No 12 Concatenation M P. squamata Concatenation No 13 SMRT ML P. gerardiana Concatenation No 14 SMRT ML P. bungeana Concatenation No 15 SMRT ML P. squamata Concatenation No 16 SMRT MP P. gerardiana Concatenation No 17 SMRT MP P. bungeana Concatenation No 18 SMRT MP P. squamata Concatenation No 19 SMRT NJ P. gerardiana Concatenation No 20 SMRT NJ P. bungeana Concatenation No 21 SMRT NJ P. squamata Concatenation No 22 SMRT M P. gerardiana Concatenation No 23 SMRT M P. bungeana Concatenation No 24 SMRT M P. squamata Concatenation No 25 STEAC ML P. gerardiana Consensus No 26 STEAC ML P. bungeana Consensus No 27 STEAC ML P. squamata Consensus No 28 STEAC MP P. gerardiana Consensus No 29 STEAC MP P. bungeana Consensus No 30 STEAC MP P. squamata Consensus No 31 STEAC NJ P. gerardiana Consensus No 32 STEAC NJ P. bungeana Consensus No 33 STEAC NJ P. squamata Consensus No 34 STEAC M P. gerardiana Consensus No 35 STEAC M P. bungeana Consensus No 36 STEAC M P. squamata Consensus No 37 STAR ML P. gerardiana Consensus Yes 38 STAR ML P. bungeana Consensus Yes 39 STAR ML P. squamata Consensus Yes 40 STAR MP P. gerardiana Consensus Yes 41 STAR MP P. bungeana Consensus Yes 42 STAR MP P. squamata Consensus Yes 43 STAR NJ P. gerardiana Consensus Yes 44 STAR NJ P. bungeana Consensus Yes 45 STAR NJ P. squamata Consensus Yes 46 STAR M P. gerardiana Consensus Yes 47 STAR M P. bungeana Consensus Yes 48 STAR M P. squamata Consensus Yes 49 RTC ML P. gerardiana Consensus Yes 50 RTC ML P. bungeana Consensus Yes 51 RTC ML P. squamata Consensus Yes 52 RTC MP P. gerardiana Consensus Yes 53 RTC MP P. bungeana Consensus Yes 54 RTC MP P. squamata Consensus Yes 55 RTC NJ P. gerardiana Consensus Yes 56 RTC NJ P. bungeana Consensus Yes 57 RTC NJ P. squamata Consensus Yes 58 RTC M P. gerardiana Consensus Yes 59 RTC M P. bungeana Consensus Yes 60 RTC M P. squamata Consensus Yes 61 MDC ML P. gerardiana Consensus Yes 62 MDC ML P. bungeana Consensus Yes 63 MDC ML P. squamata Consensus Yes 64 MDC MP P. gerardiana Consensus Yes 65 MDC MP P. bungeana Consensus Yes 66 MDC MP P. squamata Consensus Yes 67 MDC NJ P. gerardiana Consensus Yes 68 MDC NJ P. bungeana Consensus Yes 69 MDC NJ P. squamata Consensus Yes 70 MDC M P. gerardiana Consensus Yes 71 MDC M P. bungeana Consensus Yes 72 MDC M P. squamata Consensus Yes 2

TABLE S2. Sampled Pinus subsection Strobus (ingroup) and (outgroup) representatives. Dashes indicate missing data. Sample id Species Subsection State a Country Latitude Longitude Pial.ao P. albicaulis Strobus Pial-2 P. albicaulis Strobus British Columbia Canada 54.880-125.374 Pial-3 P. albicaulis Strobus Alberta Canada 53.707-119.607 Pial-4 P. albicaulis Strobus British Columbia Canada 50.095-122.899 Pial-5 P. albicaulis Strobus British Columbia Canada 49.370-119.921 Pial-6 P. albicaulis Strobus Alberta Canada 49.366-114.252 Pial-7 P. albicaulis Strobus Washington USA 48.707-118.472 Pial-8 P. albicaulis Strobus Washington USA 48.311-120.565 Pial-9 P. albicaulis Strobus Washington USA 47.821-123.134 Pial-10 P. albicaulis Strobus Washington USA 46.244-121.474 Pial-12 P. albicaulis Strobus Montana USA 45.042-109.451 Pial-13 P. albicaulis Strobus Oregon USA 44.723-118.575 Pial-15 P. albicaulis Strobus Montana USA 44.543-111.409 Pial-16 P. albicaulis Strobus California USA 41.798-122.158 Pial-17 P. albicaulis Strobus Oregon USA 43.380-121.570 Piay-1 P. ayacahuite b Strobus La Paz Honduras 14.117-87.817 Piay-2 P. ayacahuite b Strobus Ocotepeque Honduras 14.417-89.133 Piay-3 P. ayacahuite b Strobus Totonicapan Guatemala 14.933-91.350 Piay-4 P. ayacahuite b Strobus Chiapas Mexico 16.617-92.367 Piay-5 P. ayacahuite b Strobus Oaxaca Mexico 17.150-97.633 Piay-6 P. ayacahuite c Strobus Puebla Mexico 19.167-98.583 Piay-7 P. ayacahuite d Strobus Estado de Mexico Mexico 19.167-98.800 Piay-8 P. ayacahuite c Strobus Michoacan Mexico 19.600-102.330 Piay-9 P. ayacahuite c Strobus Jalisco Mexico 20.383-105.067 Piay-10 P. ayacahuite c Strobus Aguascalientes Mexico 19.600-99.767 Piay-13 P. ayacahuite d Strobus Coahuila Mexico 25.233-100.433 Piay-14 P. ayacahuite b Strobus Chiapas Mexico 15.417-92.333 Piay-15 P. ayacahuite b Strobus Oaxaca Mexico 17.400-96.483 Piay-16 P. ayacahuite b Strobus Chiapas Mexico 16.300-93.283 Piay-17 P. ayacahuite b Strobus Huehuetenango Guatemala 15.733-91.458 Piay-18 P. ayacahuite d Strobus Nuevo Leon Mexico 25.233-100.433 Piay-19 P. ayacahuite d Strobus Nuevo Leon Mexico 25.883-100.217 Pist-16 P. chiapensis Strobus Mexico Pist-17 P. chiapensis Strobus Huehuetenango Guatemala 15.800-91.300 Pist-18 P. chiapensis Strobus Oaxaca Mexico 17.217-97.983 Pifl-1 P. flexilis Strobus British Columbia Canada 50.000-115.500 Pifl-2 P. flexilis Strobus Alberta Canada 52.254-116.397 Pifl-3 P. flexilis Strobus Alberta Canada 49.083-114.230 Pifl-4 P. flexilis Strobus Utah USA 37.658-112.708 Pifl-5 P. flexilis Strobus Utah USA 37.017-110.867 Pifl-8 P. flexilis Strobus Nevada USA 36.333-115.683 Pifl-9 P. flexilis Strobus New Mexico USA 36.333-105.667 Pifl-10 P. flexilis Strobus New Mexico USA 35.216-106.450 Pifl-11 P. flexilis Strobus Colorado USA 38.733-104.950 Pifl-12 P. flexilis Strobus Colorado USA 37.650-106.650 Pifl-13 P. flexilis Strobus Colorado USA 37.367-108.067 Pifl-14 P. flexilis Strobus Colorado USA 36.490-106.367 Pifl-15 P. flexilis Strobus California USA 36.383-118.183 Pifl-16 P. flexilis Strobus Colorado USA Pifl-17 P. flexilis Strobus Colorado USA Pila-17 P. lambertiana Strobus California USA 41.687-123.831 Pila-18 P. lambertiana Strobus California USA 39.494-122.640 Pila-19 P. lambertiana Strobus California USA 35.468-115.692 Pila-20 P. lambertiana Strobus California USA 34.429-115.193 Pila-21 P. lambertiana Strobus California USA 36.790-118.929 Pila-22 P. lambertiana Strobus California USA 35.478-118.599 Pila-23 P. lambertiana Strobus Oregon USA 42.450-120.680

Pila-24 P. lambertiana Strobus California USA 34.606-119.309 Pila-26 P. lambertiana Strobus Baja California Mexico 31.000-115.500 Pila-27 P. lambertiana Strobus California USA 41.473-121.159 Pila-28 P. lambertiana Strobus Oregon USA 44.980-121.850 Pila-29 P. lambertiana Strobus California USA Pimn-1 P. monticola Strobus California USA 41.565-121.517 Pimn-2 P. monticola Strobus California USA Pimn-3 P. monticola Strobus California USA 38.975-120.284 Pimn-4 P. monticola Strobus California USA 36.046-118.349 Pimn-5 P. monticola Strobus California USA Pimn-6 P. monticola Strobus California USA Pimn-7 P. monticola Strobus California USA Pimn-8 P. monticola Strobus California USA 39.266-120.242 Pimn-9 P. monticola Strobus Oregon USA 42.033-122.942 Pimn-10 P. monticola Strobus California USA Pimn-11 P. monticola Strobus Washington USA 48.736-117.220 Pimn-12 P. monticola Strobus Oregon USA 42.372-124.290 Pimn-13 P. monticola Strobus Oregon USA 45.131-111.683 Pimn-14 P. monticola Strobus Washington USA 46.150-122.000 Pimn-15 P. monticola Strobus Washington USA 47.400-123.000 Pimn-16 P. monticola Strobus Oregon USA 44.260-122.000 Pimn-17 P. monticola Strobus Idaho USA 47.250-116.000 Pimn-18 P. monticola Strobus Montana USA 48.367-113.933 Pisb-1 P. strobiformis Strobus Colorado USA 37.417-107.000 Pisb-2 P. strobiformis Strobus Arizona USA 37.282-110.821 Pisb-3 P. strobiformis Strobus New Mexico USA 35.917-108.667 Pisb-4 P. strobiformis Strobus Arizona USA 35.317-111.700 Pisb-5 P. strobiformis Strobus New Mexico USA 35.142-108.145 Pisb-6 P. strobiformis Strobus Arizona USA 34.330-111.417 Pisb-7 P. strobiformis Strobus Arizona USA 34.108-109.567 Pisb-8 P. strobiformis Strobus New Mexico USA 33.833-108.833 Pisb-9 P. strobiformis Strobus New Mexico USA 33.167-107.467 Pisb-10 P. strobiformis Strobus New Mexico USA 32.917-105.750 Pisb-11 P. strobiformis Strobus New Mexico USA 32.750-107.583 Pisb-12 P. strobiformis Strobus Arizona USA 32.667-109.867 Pisb-13 P. strobiformis Strobus Arizona USA 32.443-110.788 Pisb-14 P. strobiformis e Strobus Coahuila Mexico 25.233-100.433 Pisb-15 P. strobiformis e Strobus Nuevo Leon Mexico 24.883-100.217 Pisb-16 P. strobiformis Strobus New Mexico USA 32.800-105.800 Pisb-17 P. strobiformis Strobus Arizona USA 34.447-111.358 Pisb-18 P. strobiformis Strobus Nuevo Leon Mexico 24.883-100.217 Pist-1 P. strobus Strobus Newfoundland and Canada 48.520-54.200 Labrador Pist-2 P. strobus Strobus Ontario Canada 47.530-83.100 Pist-3 P. strobus Strobus Minnesota USA 47.402-94.438 Pist-4 P. strobus Strobus Quebec Canada 47.160-72.580 Pist-5 P. strobus Strobus New Brunswick Canada 46.480-66.070 Pist-6 P. strobus Strobus Michigan USA 46.377-84.657 Pist-7 P. strobus Strobus Wisconsin USA 46.108-90.944 Pist-8 P. strobus Strobus Ontario Canada 45.590-77.230 Pist-9 P. strobus Strobus Maine USA 44.580-67.050 Pist-10 P. strobus Strobus Nova Scotia Canada 44.410-65.220 Pist-11 P. strobus Strobus Vermont USA 44.290-73.060 Pist-12 P. strobus Strobus Wisconsin USA 42.988-90.668 Pist-13 P. strobus Strobus New York USA 42.150-76.450 Pist-14 P. strobus Strobus Pennsylvania USA 41.100-82.150 Pist-15 P. strobus Strobus North Carolina USA 35.800-82.700 Pist-19 Pibu-1 Pige-1 Pige-2 Pisq-1 P. strobus P. bungeana P. gerardiana P. gerardiana P. squamata Strobus Pennsylvania Gilgit NE Yunnan USA Pakistan China 35.386 26.869 74.838 103.013

Pisq-2 P. squamata NE Yunnan China 26.87 103.014 a State, province or department depending on the country of origin. b P. ayacahuite var. ayacahuite c P. ayacahuite var. veitchii d P. ayacahuite var. brachyptera e Putatively P. ayacahuite var. brachyptera

0.25 0.20 Dissimilarity 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 Concatenation SMRT STEAC STAR RTC MDC ML MP NJ M P. gerardiana P. bungeana P. squamata sets 1-6 sets 7-10 sets 11-13 Figure S1: Procrustes analysis of the influence of specific features of phylogenetic strategies on principal component plots. Principal components analysis of phylogenetic inference strategies was performed as in Figure 4 with the exception that it was applied to each of 13 subsets F 1, F 2,..., F 13 of phylogenetic inference strategies for which one feature of a strategy was removed. F 1, F 2,..., F 6 are subsets containing 60 strategies, in which one of the six species tree construction methods is not included, F 7, F 8,..., F 10 are subsets containing 54 strategies, in which one of the four gene tree inference methods is not included, and F 11, F 12, F 13 are subsets containing 48 strategies, in which one of the three outgroup species is not included. In other words, we performed principal components analysis on 13 different datasets: six in which a species tree construction method was removed (Concatenation, SMRT, STEAC, STAR, RTC, and MDC), four in which a gene tree inference method was removed (ML, MP, NJ, and M), and three in which an outgroup was removed (P. gerardiana, P. bungeana, and P. squamata). The results of each principal components analysis were projected into the two-dimensional plane spanned by their first and second principal components. The points in each two-dimensional plane were compared to the points in Figure 4A through Procrustes analysis. Each comparison gives a dissimilarity score computed using eq. 3. 3