Rapid PCR-Based Method Which Can Determine Both Phenotype and Genotype of Lactococcus lactis Subspecies

Similar documents
Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis. Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris. lactis subsp. cremoris. Lac. Lactis. subsp. lactis Lac. Lactis subsp.

Molecular identification of bacteria on grapes and in must from Small Carpathian wine-producing region (Slovakia)

Supplemental Data. Jeong et al. (2012). Plant Cell /tpc

RESOLUTION OIV-OENO 576A-2017

GROWTH TEMPERATURES AND ELECTROPHORETIC KARYOTYPING AS TOOLS FOR PRACTICAL DISCRIMINATION OF SACCHAROMYCES BAYANUS AND SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE

Reasons for the study

Food Allergen and Adulteration Test Kits

SHORT TERM SCIENTIFIC MISSIONS (STSMs)

INTRODUCTION probiotics Fermentation

Identification and Classification of Pink Menoreh Durian (Durio Zibetinus Murr.) Based on Morphology and Molecular Markers

SCENARIO Propose a scenario (the hypothesis) for bacterial succession in each type of milk:

Mem. Faculty. B. O. S. T. Kindai University No. 38 : 1 10 (2016)

Construction of a Wine Yeast Genome Deletion Library (WYGDL)

Title: Development of Simple Sequence Repeat DNA markers for Muscadine Grape Cultivar Identification.

Second Annual Progress & Planning Meeting. Quantitative and Qualitative Microbiological Analysis. Neelima Nair and Rachel Lawrence

RESOLUTION OIV-OENO MOLECULAR TOOLS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE WINE YEAST AND OTHER YEAST SPECIES RELATED TO WINEMAKING

University of Groningen. In principio erat Lactococcus lactis Coelho Pinto, Joao Paulo

An Ecological Study of Lactococci Isolated from Raw Milk in the Camembert Cheese Registered Designation of Origin Area

LUISA MAYENS VÁSQUEZ RAMÍREZ. Adress: Cl 37 # 28-15, Manizales, Caldas, Colombia. Cell Phone Number:

Received 7 May 2007/Accepted 10 September 2007

WP Board 1054/08 Rev. 1

LACTIC ACID BACTERIA (OIV-Oeno , Oeno )

Sequential Separation of Lysozyme, Ovomucin, Ovotransferrin and Ovalbumin from Egg White

Lysozyme side effects in Grana Padano PDO cheese: new perspective after 30 years using

SELECTION AND IMMOBILIZATION OF ISOLATED ACETIC ACID BACTERIA ON THE EFFICIENCY OF PRODUCING ACID IN INDONESIA

Running title: Nisin A-producing Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris. A wild, novel nisin A-producing Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris genotype of

CHN-19 is packed in a convenient freeze-dried form. Recommended dosage of freeze-dried DVS cultures in units to liters:

Antisense mrna-mediated Bacteriophage Resistance in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis

Yeastmaker Yeast Transformation System 2

Yeast nuclei isolation kit. For fast and easy purification of nuclei from yeast cells.

Chemical composition and allergic activity of bread Relationship to non-yeast microorganisms and baking temperatures-

(Definition modified from APSnet)

TEMPERATURE CONDITIONS AND TOLERANCE OF AVOCADO FRUIT TISSUE

DNA-Miniprep. - Rapid boiling

Project Justification: Objectives: Accomplishments:

Biodiversity of food spoilage Yarrowia group in different kinds of food

Paper 6 Food Biotechnology F06FB24 Fermented Milk Products Curd (Indian Dahi), Buttermilk and Cheese

EVALUATION OF WILD JUGLANS SPECIES FOR CROWN GALL RESISTANCE

Where in the Genome is the Flax b1 Locus?

First Report of Pierce s Disease in New Mexico

Use of PCR-Based Methods for Rapid Differentiation of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and L. delbrueckii subsp. lactis

Evaluation of Gouda cheese available in the Egyptian market.

Recent Genetic Transfer between Lactococcus lactis and Enterobacteria

Title: Genetic Variation of Crabapples ( Malus spp.) found on Governors Island and NYC Area

Alcoholic Fermentation in Yeast A Bioengineering Design Challenge 1

An Economic And Simple Purification Procedure For The Large-Scale Production Of Ovotransferrin From Egg White

Petite Mutations and their Impact of Beer Flavours. Maria Josey and Alex Speers ICBD, Heriot Watt University IBD Asia Pacific Meeting March 2016

Atypical citrate-fermenting Lactococcus lactis strains isolated from dromedary s milk

Worm Collection. Prior to next step, determine volume of worm pellet.

Fermentation of lactose by lactic acid producing bacteria: Yoghurt

EVALUATION OF THE CHLROPLAST DNA AMONG VICIA FABA L. GERMPLASM USING RESTRICTION- SITE ANALYSIS *

Identification and Typing of Lactococcus lactis by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry

Specific Yeasts Developed for Modern Ethanol Production

BEEF Effect of processing conditions on nutrient disappearance of cold-pressed and hexane-extracted camelina and carinata meals in vitro 1

Isolation and characterization of ethanol tolerant yeast strains

DETECTION OF CAMPYLOBACTER IN MILK A COLLABORATIVE STUDY

Acidity and ph Analysis

AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF. Stephen J. Redacted for Privacy. William E. Sandine. to identify domains unique to L. lactis subsp. cremoris.

A new manufacture method for set yogurt with. low-temperature reduced dissolved oxygen fermentation

At Green Valley Creamery IN SONOMA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

FR FB YF Peel Pulp Peel Pulp

Increase of sul te tolerance in Oenococcus oeni by means of acidic adaptation

Vinmetrica s SC-50 MLF Analyzer: a Comparison of Methods for Measuring Malic Acid in Wines.

When life throws you lemons, how new innovations and good bacteria selection can help tame the acidity in cool climate wines

BENEFITS OF DANISCO KEFIR CULTURES

Lactic acid bacteria associated with wine grapes from several Australian vineyards

Preferred by the Japanese over Imported Beef

Sunflower Pectin: Adding Value to Agricultural Biomass

Use of RAPD and SCAR markers for identification of strawberry genotypes carrying red stele (Phytophtora fragariae) resistance gene Rpf1

Deciphering the microbiota of Greek table olives - A metagenomics approach

GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF FRESH BAKER S YEAST

Prod t Diff erenti ti a on

MUMmer 2.0. Original implementation required large amounts of memory

Diacetyl, Acetoin, and Acetaldehyde Production by Mixed-Species Lactic Starter Cultures

Addition of Sugar, Amino Acids and Corn Steep Liquor to Cucumber Fermentation1

EFFECT OF TOMATO GENETIC VARIATION ON LYE PEELING EFFICACY TOMATO SOLUTIONS JIM AND ADAM DICK SUMMARY

The Effect of ph on the Growth (Alcoholic Fermentation) of Yeast. Andres Avila, et al School name, City, State April 9, 2015.

Big Data and the Productivity Challenge for Wine Grapes. Nick Dokoozlian Agricultural Outlook Forum February

Chapter 7. Koji, a Mold, Plays the Most. Important Role in Making Japanese Fermented Foods

Microbial Ecology Changes with ph

Further investigations into the rind lesion problems experienced with the Pinkerton cultivar

Interpretation Guide. Yeast and Mold Count Plate

EAT ACCORDING TO YOUR GENES. NGx-Gluten TM. Personalized Nutrition Report

SPECIES AFFILIATION OF DAIRY LACTOBACILLI WITH ANGIOTENSIN CONVERTING ENZYME INHIBITORY ACTIVITY

CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L., THE QUALITY OF SAFFLOWER SEEDS CULTIVATED IN ALBANIA.

Isolating WILD. Yeast Strains. By Mike Lentz ZYMURGY JAzym14_REFwildyeast.indd 54

CHOOZIT Cheese Cultures

Clause 1. Clause 2 Clause 3. Clause FDA, MOPH.

Pevzner P., Tesler G. PNAS 2003;100: Copyright 2003, The National Academy of Sciences

Isolation of Yeasts from Various Food Products and Detection of Killer Toxin Activity In vitro

Characteristics of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Isolated from Soy Sauce and Influence on Putrefaction of Processed Soy Sauce with Less Salt

Laboratory Performance Assessment. Report. Analysis of Pesticides and Anthraquinone. in Black Tea

Enzymes in Industry Time: Grade Level Objectives: Achievement Standards: Materials:

DNA extraction method as per QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Germany)

Protein Pattern and Plasmid Profile of Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from Dahi, A Traditional Fermented Milk Product of Pakistan

Detection of cow milk paneer in mixed/buffalo milk paneer through conventional species specific Polymerase Chain Reaction

Newborn Screening for Pompe Disease in New York

Indicate (X) client(s) to whom this final report is submitted. Replace any of these with other relevant clients if required. FINAL REPORT FOR 2012

Allergens in wine a specific detection of Casein, Egg and Lysozyme

Shazia Mannan COMSATS Institute of Information Technology Sahiwal Campus, Pakistan

Transcription:

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, May 2002, p. 2209 2213 Vol. 68, No. 5 0099-2240/02/$04.00 0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.5.2209 2213.2002 Copyright 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Rapid PCR-Based Method Which Can Determine Both Phenotype and Genotype of Lactococcus lactis Subspecies Masaru Nomura,* Miho Kobayashi, and Takashi Okamoto Department of Animal Products Research, National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, Norindanchi, Tsukuba 305-0901, Japan Received 27 August 2001/Accepted 15 February 2002 A highly efficient, rapid, and reliable PCR-based method for distinguishing Lactococcus lactis subspecies (L. lactis subsp. lactis and ) is described. Primers complementary to positions in the glutamate decarboxylase gene have been constructed. PCR analysis with extracted DNA or with cells of different L. lactis strains resulted in specific fragments. The length polymorphism of the PCR fragments allowed a clear distinction of the L. lactis subspecies. The amplified fragment length polymorphism with the primers and the restriction fragment length polymorphism of the amplified products agreed perfectly with the identification based on genotypic and phenotypic analyses, respectively. Isolates from cheese starters were investigated by this method, and amplified fragments of genetic variants were found to be approximately 40 bp shorter than the typical fragments. * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Animal Products Research, National Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science, Norindanchi, Tsukuba 305-0901, Japan. Phone: 81 298 38 8688. Fax: 81 298 38 8683. E-mail: nomura@affrc.go.jp. Lactococcal strains are essential to milk fermentation, especially in the cheese-making process, providing optimal conditions for curd formation and for the development of texture and flavor. It is important to the dairy industry to identify new strains of Lactococcus lactis for cheese manufacture. Dairy lactococcal strains are subdivided into L. lactis subsp. lactis and based on a few phenotypic tests: growth in 4% NaCl, ph 9.2, at 40 C; the ability to hydrolyze arginine (7); and sensitivity to lithium chloride (1). Recently, a novel criterion for distinguishing L. lactis subsp. lactis from has been reported: glutamate decarboxylase (GAD; EC 4.1.1.15) activity, which has been observed in L. lactis subsp. lactis and not in L. lactis subsp. cremoris (8). GAD catalyzes the irreversible decarboxylation of glutamate to -aminobutyric acid (GABA). GAD constitutes a glutamate-dependent acid resistance mechanism with a glutamate-gaba antiporter (12). The gadb gene encoding L. lactis subsp. cremoris GAD was apparently inactivated by a frameshift mutation resulting from an adenine deletion or a thymine insertion and encoded a nonfunctional protein (10). It has been discovered in recent years that L. lactis strains can be divided into two phylogenetic groups based on genotypic analysis (6, 11, 13), and it has been proposed that the subspecies diagnoses be redefined to reflect these natural relationships (6). The new taxonomic system requires the transfer of several strains across subspecies lines, from L. lactis subsp. lactis to and vice versa. As classification according to phenotypic criteria is complicated and requires skill, simple, fast, and reliable molecular methods have been developed (3, 5). Classification based on these methods, however, coincides with genotypic identification and does not always correlate with phenotypic characterization. The classification of L. lactis subspecies based on phenotypic characteristics is of primary importance in the dairy industry, as phenotypes directly reveal the abilities required in milk fermentation. It has been reported that PCR analysis with oligonucleotide primers designed for the rrnb-rrnc region correlates with phenotypic characterization (2). In this paper, we describe useful PCR primers for distinguishing L. lactis subspecies. Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of L. lactis can be determined by one PCR and subsequent nuclease digestion. Results of amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis with these primers agreed with the genotypic identification, and the restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of the amplified products concurred with the phenotypic identification. In addition, 37 isolates of L. lactis were examined by the PCR-based method and by phenotypic differentiation, with strains being differentiated to the subspecies level. Four of 20 isolates of were found to have shorter fragments than the other isolates. The amplified fragments of these strains were sequenced. MATERIALS AND METHODS Bacterial strains and growth conditions. L. lactis subsp. lactis strains ATCC 9936 and ATCC 19435, L. lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis ATCC 13675, L. lactis subsp. cremoris ATCC 19257, Leuconostoc mesenteroides ATCC 8293, and Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Va.). Enterococcus faecalis IFO 12964 was obtained from the Institute for Fermentation, Osaka (Osaka, Japan). Streptococcus thermophilus 9Y was from laboratory collections. Other L. lactis strains and their growth conditions have been described previously (8). Phenotypic characteristics were determined as described previously (8). Genotypic characterization of L. lactis was performed by PCR analysis with primers PALA-4 and PALA-14, as described by Garde et al. (5). Actively growing cultures were obtained by transferring a 1% inoculum to tryptone-yeast extract-glucose (10), M17 broth (14) containing 0.5% glucose (GM17), or MRS broth (4) and then incubating the cultures at 30 C for 16 h. PCR and restriction endonuclease digestion. Preparation of genomic DNA has been described previously (10). The sense primer (gadb21) was 5 -CGTTA TGGATTTGATGGATATAAAGC-3, located within the gadb gene, and the antisense primer (GAD7) was 5 -ACTCTTCTTAAGAACAAGTTTAACAGC- 3, which is located downstream from the gene. Each 50 l of PCR mixture contained 200 ng of genomic DNA, 20 pmol of each primer, reagent mixture, and 2209

2210 NOMURA ET AL. APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL. TABLE 1. Sources of the L. lactis gadb gene sequences Strain Accession no. Reference or source L. lactis subsp. lactis biovar AB010789 9 diacetylactis NIAI 01-7 L. lactis subsp. lactis ATCC 19435 AB067750 This study MG1363 AF005098 12 ATCC 19257 AB033218 10 NIAI 01-1 AB033220 10 NIAI 53-2 AB067751 This study 924 AB033222 10 F-16 AB033224 10 HP AB033226 10 ML AB033228 10 H-61 AB033230 10 Ampli Taq gold DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, Calif.). PCR amplification was conducted with a GeneAmp PCR System 2400 (Perkin-Elmer). The PCR conditions were as follows: denaturation at 94 C for 9 min, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 94 C for 30 s, annealing at 50 C for 30 s, and extension at 72 C for 60 s, with an additional extension of 7 min at 72 C after the last cycle. The amplified fragments were digested with AseI restriction endonuclease (Toyobo, Tokyo, Japan) according to a supplier s instructions. The fragments were run on a 4% NuSieve GTG agarose gel (BioWhittaker Molecular Applications, Rockland, Maine) and were stained with ethidium bromide. DNA sequence analysis. Amplified double-stranded DNA was purified by electrophoresis on a 4% NuSieve GTG agarose gel for direct sequencing. Both strands of purified DNA were sequenced with a DYEnamic ET terminator cycle sequencing kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.) and a 373A DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). The DNA sequences used in this study are listed in Table 1. The 16S rrna gene was amplified and sequenced as described previously (15). Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The sequences of the gadb genes of L. lactis subsp. lactis ATCC 19435 and NIAI 53-2 have been assigned accession numbers AB067750 and AB067751, respectively. RESULTS The genotypes and phenotypes of L. lactis strains used in this study are summarized in Table 2. L. lactis strain MG1363 is classified as based on its genotypic traits, although it shows the phenotypic abilities of L. lactis subsp. lactis. Strain MG1363 also exhibits GAD activity. Strain IL1403 showed the ability to produce GABA like the typical L. lactis subsp. lactis although it could not hydrolyze arginine. At first, the gadb sequences of strains ATCC 19257 and MG1363 were compared with those of L. lactis subsp. lactis NIAI 01-7 and ATCC 19435 (Fig. 1). Two specific bases were observed only in the sequence of strain 01-7 (C 2331 and T 2382 ). At the 3 untranslated region of L. lactis subsp. cremoris gadb (including strain MG1363), three fragmentary deletions were observed: a 24-bp deletion upstream of the stem-loop structure of the transcription terminator and two 6-bp deletions downstream of the stem-loop. Further, an additional 1-bp deletion in GAD-negative strains such as L. lactis subsp. cremoris ATCC 19257 was observed (Fig. 1). These deletions were also commonly observed in another six strains of GAD-negative NIAI 01-1, 924, F-16, H-61, HP, and ML (data not shown). The PCR primers were designed to amplify the sequences comprising both the thymine insertion within the coding region (10) and the deletions at the 3 untranslated region. The positions of these primers on TABLE 2. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of L. lactis strains Strain NH 3 from arginine GABA from glutamate Amplification by PCR of: 1,131 bp 700 bp L. lactis subsp. lactis ATCC 19435 NIAI 527 ATCC 9936 IL1403 L. lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis ATCC 13675 NIAI 01-7 DRC1 17 isolates a ND b ND MG1363 ATCC 19257 NIAI 01-1 924 F-16 HP ML H-61 20 isolates a ND ND a Isolated in previous work (8). b ND, not determined. the sequence determined by Nomura et al. (9) were 1901 to 1926 and 2502 to 2476, respectively. The lengths of the expected amplified fragments were 602 bp for the L. lactis subsp. lactis-type strain and 564 bp for. FIG. 1. Multiple alignment of gadb sequences from L. lactis subsp. lactis NIAI 01-7, L. lactis subsp. lactis ATCC 19435, L. lactis subsp. cremoris MG1363, and ATCC 19257. PCR primers are boxed. Dashed box, AseI restriction site; dashed arrows, inverted repeat, suggestive of a transcription terminator (not including the poly[t] stretch); asterisks, positions of insertions or deletions. The numbering is according to the sequence of L. lactis subsp. lactis NIAI 01-7 reported by Nomura et al. (9).

VOL. 68, 2002 DETERMINATION OF L. LACTIS PHENOTYPE AND GENOTYPE 2211 TABLE 3. PCR fragments and RFLP analyses for gadb gene in L. lactis Strain PCR fragment of: 600 bp 560 bp Digestion with AseI FIG. 2. PCR amplification and digestion with AseI of L. lactis gadb. Conditions for PCR and electrophoresis are described in Materials and Methods. Lanes: 1, L. lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis ATCC 13675; 2, L. lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis NIAI 01-7; 3, L. lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis DRC1; 4, L. lactis subsp. lactis ATCC 19435; 5, L. lactis subsp. lactis NIAI 527; 6, L. lactis subsp. lactis ATCC 9936; 7, L. lactis subsp. lactis IL1403; 8, MG1363; 9, ATCC 19257; 10, L. lactis subsp. cremoris H-61; 11, HP; 12, S. thermophilus 9Y; 13, Leuconostoc mesenteroides ATCC 8293; 14, E. faecalis IFO 12964; 15, Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393. PCR amplification of seven L. lactis subsp. lactis strains and four strains was performed. Specific DNA amplification was observed with all L. lactis strains tested, but not with other species such as S. thermophilus 9Y, Leuconostoc mesenteroides ATCC 8293, E. faecalis IFO 12964, and Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 (Fig. 2A). The sizes of the amplified products were approximately 600 bp for L. lactis subsp. lactis and L. lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis (Fig. 2A, lanes 1 to 7) and approximately 560 bp for L. lactis subsp. cremoris (Fig. 2A, lanes 8 to 11). The product from strain MG1363, which is a GAD-positive strain, revealed close to 560 bp that were like those of the GAD-negative strains, as predicted from the DNA sequence (12) (Fig. 2A, lane 8). PCR fragments of L. lactis subsp. lactis were cut into portions of approximately 190 and 410 bp with endonuclease AseI, while those of were not (Fig. 2B). The PCR product of MG1363 was also digested into two fragments as were those of L. lactis subsp. lactis, although the sizes of the resulting fragments were different (approximately 190 and 370 bp) (Fig. 2B, lane 8). The results of the PCR-RFLP analyses are summarized in Table 3. For each strain, digestion with AseI appeared to correspond to the GAD phenotype. Bacterial cells were subsequently investigated with PCR templates instead of extracted DNA. A bacterial culture grown in tryptone-yeast extract-glucose, GM17, or MRS medium was sequentially diluted with sterile deionized water, and a 1- l portion was used as a template. In addition, a colony on the agar plate was picked up with a sterile toothpick and then suspended directly into a PCR mixture. Amplification was observed with a culture broth diluted from 10- to 10 4 -fold but not with undiluted broth. The reaction was also observed with a cell from the colony. The PCR fragments resulting from both cell preparations were the same as those obtained with the extracted DNA (data not shown). These results indicate that vegetative cells can be substituted for genomic DNA as a template for PCR. L. lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis ATCC 13675 NIAI 01-7 DRC1 L. lactis subsp. lactis ATCC 19435 NIAI 527 ATCC 9936 IL1403 MG1363 ATCC 19257 H-61 HP S. thermophilus 9Y ND a Leuconostoc mesenteroides ND ATCC 8293 E. faecalis IFO 12964 ND Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 ND a ND, not determined. Thirty-seven isolates from cheese starters were investigated by this method. Based on some phenotypic characteristics, 17 of the 37 strains were identified as L. lactis subsp. lactis and 20 were identified as (8). Fragments with the expected lengths were amplified from all 17 strains of L. lactis subsp. lactis and from 16 of 20 strains of L. lactis subsp. cremoris (data not shown). The PCR fragments of the remaining strains, 53-2, 53-4, 53-6, and 53-8, were slightly shorter than those of the typical L. lactis subsp. cremoris strains (Fig. 3). The apparent sizes of the fragments were estimated to be approximately 520 bp. The fragments of strains 53-2 and 53-6 were sequenced, and it was found that the sequences were identical to each other. The sequences were compared with those of common strains (Fig. 4). A further 43-bp deletion from the end of the coding region to the transcription terminator was observed. Two deletions downstream of the stem-loop (both 6 bp) were conserved. The expected length of each amplified fragment was 521 bp, which was the size estimated from gel electrophoresis. The 16S rrna gene sequences of strains 53-2 and 53-6 were determined. The sizes of the amplified sequences were 300 bp. The two sequences were identical to each other and were found to have an identity to (11). These results suggest that strains 53-2 and 53-6 should be classified as, although gadb of these strains exhibited genetic polymorphism. DISCUSSION To improve starter cultures for the dairy industry, isolation and classification of new L. lactis strains from nature have been carried out. Dairy products are made by good use of pheno-

2212 NOMURA ET AL. APPL. ENVIRON. MICROBIOL. FIG. 3. PCR amplification and digestion with AseI of the gadb gene in isolates from cheese starters. Conditions for PCR and electrophoresis are described in Materials and Methods. Lanes: 1, L. lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetylactis NIAI 01-7; 2, L. lactis subsp. lactis ATCC 19435; 3, ATCC 19257; 4, L. lactis subsp. cremoris 53-2; 5, 53-6. typic properties of starter organisms. Therefore, it is necessary to know the phenotypes of isolates for application to the dairy industry. However, the traditional microbiological characterization is usually time-consuming and requires skill. The simple and reliable methods elucidating phenotypic characteristics are extremely useful in obtaining new strains. A nucleic acid-based approach can provide technical simplicity and accuracy for differentiation of strains. For L. lactis subspecies identification, Southern hybridization (11) and PCR (3, 5) have been developed. These methods, however, are based on genetics. Genotypic identification does not always correlate with phenotypes. We, therefore, investigated a PCR-RFLP technique that specifically differentiates L. lactis subspecies. In this study, some fragmentary deletions were observed at the 3 untranslated region of gadb. Since the PCR primers were designed to amplify the deletion region, the lengths of the products from were 37 bp shorter than those of L. lactis subsp. lactis. The amplified fragment length polymorphism concurred with the genotypic classification. FIG. 4. Alignment of the nucleotide sequences of the 3 region of L. lactis gadb. Dashed arrows, inverted repeat, suggestive of a transcription terminator (not including the poly[t] stretch); asterisks, positions of insertions or deletions. Base pair numbering is as in Fig. 1. A common thymine insertion within the coding region of L. lactis subsp. cremoris gadb has been observed (10). The insertion site is included in the amplified region with primers gadb21 and GAD7. An AseI site present in the amplified region of L. lactis subsp. lactis is absent in the counterpart of L. lactis subsp. cremoris due to this thymine insertion. Thus, the PCR products of L. lactis subsp. lactis can be cut with AseI into two fragments, while those of cannot. Digestion with AseI appears to occur concurrently with GAD activity, making it a criterion for phenotypic classification (8). Isolation of new strains is usually performed by picking a single colony grown on an agar plate. In this study, L. lactis could be detected by PCR using the cells of isolates as templates. After isolation from a plate, the isolates can be subsequently subjected to PCR without cultivation and DNA preparation. The primers in this study identified all L. lactis strains tested and distinguished them to the subspecies level. The non-l. lactis strains showed no positive result. The assay is not affected by physiological cell parameters, and the identification procedure leads to reliable results in fast and easy steps. Unlike other available molecular techniques, this PCR assay can be used to determine genotypes and phenotypes of L. lactis subspecies. Some mutations in the primer recognition sequence make it impossible to amplify a fragment. In this case, the fragment cannot be detected even if the unknown organism is L. lactis. Since there was a strain, 53-2, with a deletion greater than that found in a typical strain, it is possible that there is a variant with a further deletion in the sequence complementary to the primers. It is also possible that the recognition sequence is replaced and becomes impossible to anneal with the primers. The restriction enzyme site used for RFLP analysis is conserved in L. lactis subsp. lactis strains currently investigated. If there is a variant in which GAD is inactivated by mutations of other parts in gadb gene, even if the sequence of the restriction site is typical, the results of RFLP and phenotyping will not be in agreement. This PCR-RFLP technique is useful for screening and grouping new lactococcal isolates. It is critical that the techniques used to differentiate between L. lactis subspecies allow for correlation between phenotypic and genotypic identification. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We are grateful to M. Takeuchi and K. Chikuni for their valuable discussions. REFERENCES 1. Al-Zoreky, N., and W. E. Sandine. 1991. Lactococcus genus: a selective and differential agar medium. J. Food Sci. 56:1729 1734. 2. Basaran, P., N. Basaran, and I. Cakir. 2001. Molecular differentiation of Lactococcus lactis subspecies lactis and cremoris strains by ribotyping and site specific-pcr. Curr. Microbiol. 42:45 48. 3. Beimfohr, C., W. Ludwig, and K. H. Schleifer. 1997. Rapid genotypic differentiation of Lactococcus lactis subspecies and biovar. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 20:216 221. 4. de Man, J. C., M. Rogosa, and M. E. Sharpe. 1960. A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 23:130 135. 5. Garde, S., M. Babin, P. Gaya, M. Nunez, and M. Medina. 1999. PCR amplification of the gene acma differentiates Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:5151 5153. 6. Godon, J.-J., C. Delorme, S. D. Ehrlich, and P. Renault. 1992. Divergence of genomic sequences between Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis and Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:4045 4047.

VOL. 68, 2002 DETERMINATION OF L. LACTIS PHENOTYPE AND GENOTYPE 2213 7. Mundt, J. O. 1986. Lactic acid streptococci, p. 1065 1066. In P. H. A. Sneath, N. S. Mair, M. E. Sharpe, and J. G,. Holt (ed.), Bergey s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol. 2. The Williams & Wilkins Co., Baltimore, Md. 8. Nomura, M., H. Kimoto, Y. Someya, and I. Suzuki. 1999. Novel characteristic for distinguishing Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis from subsp. cremoris. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49:163 166. 9. Nomura, M., I. Nakajima, Y. Fujita, M. Kobayashi, H. Kimoto, I. Suzuki, and H. Aso. 1999. Lactococcus lactis contains only one glutamate decarboxylase gene. Microbiology 145:1375 1380. 10. Nomura, M., M. Kobayashi, S. Ohmomo, and T. Okamoto. 2000. Inactivation of the glutamate decarboxylase gene in Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:2235 2237. 11. Salama, M., W. Sandine, and S. Giovannoni. 1991. Development and application of oligonucleotide probes for identification of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:1313 1318. 12. Sanders, J. W., K. Leenhouts, J. Burghoorn, J. R. Brands, G. Venema, and J. Kok. 1998. A chloride-inducible acid resistance mechanism in Lactococcus lactis and its regulation. Mol. Microbiol. 27:299 310. 13. Swindell, S. R., H. G. Griffin, and M. J. Gasson. 1994. Cloning, sequencing and comparison of three lactococcal L-lactate dehydrogenase genes. Microbiology 140:1301 1305. 14. Terzaghi, B. E., and W. E. Sandine. 1975. Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages. Appl. Microbiol. 29:807 813. 15. Ward, L. J. H., L. C. S. Brown, and G. P. Davey. 1998. Two methods for the genetic differentiation of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis and cremoris based on differences in the 16S rrna gene sequence. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 166:15 20.