Non-Structural Carbohydrates in Forage Cultivars Troy Downing Oregon State University

Similar documents
EFFECT OF HARVEST TIMING ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SMALL GRAIN FORAGE. Carol Collar, Steve Wright, Peter Robinson and Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT

Interactions of forage quality and quantity, their implications in grazing and hay management

Preference, yield, and forage nutritive value of annual grasses under horse grazing

Effects of feeding brown midrib dwarf. performance and enteric methane. pearl millet silage on lactational. emission in dairy cows

2010 Spring Cereal Grain Forage Trials

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

OVERSEEDING EASTERN GAMAGRASS WITH COOL-SEASON GRASSES OR GRASS- LEGUME MIXTURES. Abstract

FORAGE YIELD AND SOILBORNE MOSAIC VIRUS RESISTANCE OF SEVERAL VARIETIES OF RYE, TRITICALE, AND WHEAT

COMPARISON OF CORE AND PEEL SAMPLING METHODS FOR DRY MATTER MEASUREMENT IN HASS AVOCADO FRUIT

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County

CHAMPION TOC INDEX. How To Make Barley Silage. Arvid Aasen. Take Home Message. The Ensiling Process

Some Hay Considerations

Forage Planting Alternatives Mike Ballweg, Crops & Soils Agent, Sheboygan County

The Potential for Teff as an Alternative Forage Crop for Irrigated Regions

Materials and Methods

Legume and Cool-Season Grass Mixtures: A Demonstration Planting in Perkins County, South Dakota

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

Comparing canola and lupin varieties by time of sowing in the Northern Agricultural Region

What Effect do Nitrogen Fertilization Rate and Harvest Date Have on Cranberry Fruit Yield and Quality?

WINE GRAPE TRIAL REPORT

Double Crop System. To Maximize Annual Forage Yield & Quality. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

COMPARISON OF SEEDING RATES AND COATING ON SEEDLING COUNT, ROOT LENGTH, ROOT WEIGHT AND SHOOT WEIGHT OF CRIMSON CLOVER

FIELD PEAS IN LIVESTOCK DIETS. Karla Jenkins Cow/calf range management specialist, Panhandle Research and Extension Center

COMPARISON OF BLACKLINE-RESISTANT AND CONVENTIONAL WALNUT VARIETIES IN THE CENTRAL COAST

IMPACT OF OVERSEEDING COOL-SEASON ANNUAL FORAGES ON SPRING REGROWTH OF TIFTON 85 BERMUDAGRASS 1. Abstract

ALBINISM AND ABNORMAL DEVELOPMENT OF AVOCADO SEEDLINGS 1

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE DAIRY INDUSTRY 1

WALNUT BLIGHT CONTROL USING XANTHOMONAS JUGLANDIS BUD POPULATION SAMPLING

Treating vines after hail: Trial results. Bob Emmett, Research Plant Pathologist

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

SUPPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS FOR THE COW-CALF HERD

2009 National Cool-Season Traffic Trial. Seed Companies and Breeders. Kevin N. Morris, Executive Director. DATE: July 6, 2009

HARVESTING MAXIMUM VALUE FROM SMALL GRAIN CEREAL FORAGES. George Fohner 1 ABSTRACT

ANSWERS TO SOME COMMON QUESTIONS ON SILAGE MANAGEMENT

Effects of Ground Ear Corn vs. Ear Corn Silage on Rumen Fatty Acid Content

Supplementation Some protein, a lil energy, and minerals. Josh Davy MS, PAS, CRM UC Advisor Livestock and Range Tehama, Glenn, Colusa

Faba Bean. Uses of Faba Bean

(A report prepared for Milk SA)

Anaerobic Cell Respiration by Yeast

D Lemmer and FJ Kruger

TEMPERATURE CONDITIONS AND TOLERANCE OF AVOCADO FRUIT TISSUE

The Wild Bean Population: Estimating Population Size Using the Mark and Recapture Method

Evaluating forage quality by visual appraisal, ph, and dry matter content

Quality of western Canadian flaxseed 2012

Using Growing Degree Hours Accumulated Thirty Days after Bloom to Help Growers Predict Difficult Fruit Sizing Years

THE EVALUATION OF WALNUT VARIETIES FOR CALIFORNIA S CENTRAL COAST REGION 2007 HARVEST

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Analyzing Human Impacts on Population Dynamics Outdoor Lab Activity Biology

1

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001

Feeder Cattle Grades, Carcass Grades, & Meat Palatability. Shelby Filley Regional Livestock & Forages Specialist. Purpose

Forage Systems to Increase Productivity

western Canadian flaxseed 2003

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

Silage is a forage crop that is preserved in succulent condition by a process of fermentation (i.e. under anaerobic conditions).

Buying Filberts On a Sample Basis

Evaluating Hazelnut Cultivars for Yield, Quality and Disease Resistance

Managing for Corn Silage Yield and Quality. Ev Thomas Miner Institute

YIELD POTENTIAL OF NOVEL SEMI-DWARF GRAIN AMARANTHS TESTED FOR TENNESSEE GROWING CONDITIONS

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

PROCEDURE million pounds of pecans annually with an average

Stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) an Interesting Species for Agroforestry in Chile

THE POTENTIAL FOR TEFF AS AN ALTERNATIVE FORAGE CROP FOR IRRIGATED REGIONS. Jay Davisonˡ, Mike Laca², Earl Creech³ ABSTRACT

Silage Forage Quality Using Inoculants and Packing. Dr. Dan Undersander University of Wisconsin

Faba bean whole crop silage for dairy cows

Wine-Tasting by Numbers: Using Binary Logistic Regression to Reveal the Preferences of Experts

CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L., THE QUALITY OF SAFFLOWER SEEDS CULTIVATED IN ALBANIA.

Report to Pennsylvania Vegetable Marketing and Research Program and Pennsylvania Vegetable Growers Association

Opp p o p r o tun u i n t i ie i s t o o I m I p m r p ov o e v S arch h D ig i e g stib i i b l i i l t i y y on o n D air i y F rms

Introduction Methods

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

The Changing Landscape of Dairy: A Regional Outlook. Mark Stephenson Director of Dairy Policy Analysis

Annual Grasses Preserved as Silage: Fermentation Characteristics, Nutritive Value, and Quality

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

FACTORS DETERMINING UNITED STATES IMPORTS OF COFFEE

Record Exports for Coffee Year 2016/17

2016 Corn Silage Field Crop Trials Results

Quorn the production of alternative first-class protein source for a balanced, sustainable diet.

Warm-Season Annual Legumes: Past, Present, and Future

2016 & 2017 Legend Seeds Silage Research Report

Objective. SROC Calf and Heifer Research Facility. Data for study

The aim of the thesis is to determine the economic efficiency of production factors utilization in S.C. AGROINDUSTRIALA BUCIUM S.A.

Seasonal trends in hectares planted, sales volumes on markets and market prices. Pieter van Zyl, Potatoes South Africa

PERFORMANCE OF FOUR FORAGE TURNIP VARIETIES AT MADRAS, OREGON, J. Loren Nelson '

MONTHLY COFFEE MARKET REPORT

Overseeding Rhizoma Perennial Peanut Pasture and Hay Fields during the Cool Season 1

Quality of western Canadian flaxseed 2013

Quality of Canadian oilseed-type soybeans 2017

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Dd-#eluhgo S g. -ie lo : 3 Apg 1. Meaemet I-, Agcf~r. 0 - ~ tio AtSr * 0res. ;# I- en, s Ous.: e a S u lsi a a

Red Clover Varieties for North-Central Florida

Insect Screening Results

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Transcription:

Non-Structural Carbohydrates in Forage Cultivars Troy Downing Oregon State University Contact at: OSU Extension Service, Tillamook County, 2204 4 th St., Tillamook, OR 97141, 503-842-3433, Email, troy.downing@oregonstate.edu

Summary Introduction A relatively new analysis used to evaluate grass forage quality is measurement of total nonstructural carbohydrates (TNC). Total nonstructural carbohydrates drive the efficiency of the rumen and the ensiling process. In the rumen, increasing TNC increases the use of rumen degradable protein and therefore increases microbial protein production. During the ensiling process, increasing TNC increases rate of fermentation and which increases the preservation of the ensiled nutrients. Grass cultivars are normally selected for yield and resistance to disease and pests. From a milk production standpoint, palatability and the cows intake are very important. Dry matter intake allows the cow to meet her physiological requirements and supports efficient milk production. We are just beginning to see interest by researchers to learn more about a cultivar s palatability and intake potential. Understanding these performance differences between cultivars is of growing importance. In addition to the palatability and intake of the respective grasses, the nutrients derived from the grasses greatly influence milk production. The efficiency of grass protein or nitrogen utilization for milk production tends to be low, partially due to the lack of carbohydrate available to the microorganisms in comparison to the protein available to the microorganisms. This reduces the efficiency of capture of rapidly degradable plant nitrogen by the rumen microbial population and much of the nitrogen is excreted in the urine. When additional sugars are introduced to the rumen, microbial protein production is increased A major source of energy for microbial nitrogen synthesis in animals grazing grass forages is TNC. Very little work has been done studying the natural variations between cultivars in sugar content. In a study examining palatability, researchers reported three tall fescue varieties having 13.3% water-soluble carbohydrates were considered more palatable to cattle than three others having only 10.8%.. A production study from the United Kingdom reported that dairy cows had higher feed dry matter intake (12.5 vs. 10.8 kg DM/day) and increased milk production (15.3 vs. 12.6 kg/day) when consuming green chop forages selected for higher TNC over typical ryegrasses. In addition, researchers observed differences in efficiency of use of feed nitrogen. Authors theorized this was primarily due to differences in the microbial capture of rumen degradable nitrogen. The data also suggests that selecting forages for higher TNC may have the potential to reduce nitrogen excretion. The objectives of this study were to:1) Sample total nonstructural carbohydrates (TNC) and dry matter (DM) yield of cool-season forage grasses throughout the growing season.

2) In year 1, look specifically at seasonal and diurnal variations in a large population of cool season grasses. 3) Observe potential variations in the relationship between the level of TNC and DM yield among species and varieties of cool-season forage grasses. 4) In year 2, plant 10 new varieties that have potential to be high in sugars including varieties studied in grazing trails in the UK and determine total sugar production throughout the season. Materials and Methods Year 1 Eleven perennial ryegrasses, four orchard grasses, one festolium, and one prairie grass were planted in 4 x 25 field plots in Tillamook, Oregon. Three replicates of each variety were planted. Randomization was used to assign variety to plot. Each of the 51 field plots was harvested on six sampling dates in the 2001-growing season. For each of the six dates, DM yield of each field plot was recorded. For three dates, April 20, June 28, and October 1, forage samples were collected for TNC analysis in both the early morning and late afternoon. Immediately after cutting, samples were placed on dry ice to reduce respiration losses. Samples were dried in an oven. TNC analyses were performed at Dairy One Laboratory. Year 2 Ten perennial ryegrasses were identified as being possible high sugar grasses from forage breeders around the world. Cultivars were planted in 4 x 25 field plots and replicated three times. Each of the 30 field plots was harvested on six sampling dates in the 2002 - growing season. Immediately after cutting, samples were placed on dry ice to reduce respiration losses. Samples were dried in an oven. TNC analyses were performed at Dairy One Laboratory. Results and Discussion Non-structural carbohydrates in cool season grasses do significantly vary between varieties, species, from am to pm and seasonally. The variations found appear tremendous and can be difficult to document because of the enormous variation. However, this project was able to demonstrate that certain cultivars and varieties consistently were higher in non-structural carbohydrates than others. Table 1 is the non-structural carbohydrate data for year 1. This table shows the varieties study and the actual percent non-structural carbohydrate value for the testing period. Interestingly, some varieties appeared to fluctuate more from am to pm than others,

however, all varieties demonstrated some variation. Varieties are listed by average non-structural carbohydrate concentration from the highest to lowest. The value in the far right column labeled total is actually an index rating to rate varieties. The highest varieties are all ryegrasses. Matua is a prairie grass and ended up averaging in the middle of those varieties tested. The festuolium tested was Barfest, averaging below all the ryegrasses and just above the orchard grasses. All four varieties on the bottom of the table are orchard grasses. Figure 1, 2, and 3 illustrate the relationship observed between nonstructural carbohydrates and dry matter yield. Interestingly, this relationship was negative for April and October and slightly positive for June. The season average was negative and is illustrated in Figure 4. This phenomenon is interesting, but not really surprising. It has been understood for years that slow growing hay, for example, will be of higher quality than fast growing hay. I believe during the middle of the summer growth rate slowed, actually shifting quality (non-structural carbohydrates) higher. Yield data tend to support this theory, but are not conclusive. Table 1. Non-structural carbohydrate values for am/pm harvested cultivars in 2001 Sugars 2001 4-20am 4-20pm 6-28am 6-28pm 10-1am 10-1pm Total Elgon 14.3 13.7 18.2 25.3 21.0 23.9 116.4 Tetralite 14.8 14.7 16.3 25.1 19.4 23.9 114.2 Herbie 11.5 13.3 19.2 25.9 19.6 21.7 111.2 BG-34 12.6 16.2 17.2 19.4 17.1 27.3 109.8 Tonga 15.8 21.7 16.0 20.6 15.2 20.0 109.3 Glenn 13.8 17.6 17.0 19.1 19.5 21.8 108.8 Bison 12.1 12.4 18.4 24.5 15.9 22.9 106.2 Matua 12.2 22.6 14.5 21.9 15.5 18.7 105.4 Barfort 14.4 18.0 14.0 23.5 13.8 20.3 104.0 Flanker 12.9 13.6 17.7 21.0 15.2 23.5 103.9 Belramo 12.5 14.1 14.6 19.2 18.3 17.5 96.2 Bronsyn 9.0 15.1 17.6 21.2 13.0 16.5 92.4 Barfest 11.7 15.9 13.5 12.2 13.3 21.8 88.4 Orion 14.3 11.9 17.1 22.4 10.2 11.1 87.0 Pizza 10.0 12.4 12.3 19.6 8.2 12.5 75.0 Cambria 9.7 14.8 9.1 15.6 10.3 12.8 72.3 Baridana 10.8 11.6 8.8 14.0 9.0 16.5 70.7

April 20 Average TNC 25 20 15 10 5 0 R² = 0.2727 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 April 20 DM yield Figure 1 The relationship between nonstructural carbohydrate and dry matter yield in the April sampling period. 30 June 28 Average TNC 25 20 15 10 5 0 R² = 0.0261 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 June 28 DM yield Figure 2 The relationship between nonstructural carbohydrate and dry matter yield in the June sampling period.

October 1 average TNC 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 R² = 0.5373 0 1000 2000 3000 October1 DM yield Figure 3 The relationship between nonstructural carbohydrate and dry matter yield in the October sampling period. Average Annual TNC 25 20 15 10 5 0 R² = 0.4515 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 Total DM Figure 4 The relationship between nonstructural carbohydrate and dry matter yield throughout all sampling periods.

In year 2, data collection focused on documenting the total pounds of sugars or nonstructural carbohydrates produced. Table 2 illustrates the actual data by cutting. Amazon ryegrass averaged the highest percent non-structural carbohydrates throughout the season at 20.9 with Impact the lowest at 16.3%. When we determined total dry matter produced and consequently, total nonstructural carbohydrates produced, the ryegrass variety from the UK, Aberavon was the highest at 2306 lbs/acre. This variety is one in particular that has been bred in Europe to be higher in non-structural carbohydrates than most ryegrasses. Table 2. Percent non-structural carbohydrate, dry matter, and total lbs of nonstructural carbohydrates for cultivars harvested in 2002 Sugars 2002 % NSC Averages 3-Apr 26-Apr 13-May 13-Jun 31-Jul 3-Nov Tivoli 20.8 18.1 20.6 13.1 13.3 22.7 18.1 Aberdart 14.2 17.2 21.2 12.3 12.3 26.4 17.3 Aberavon 12.3 20.7 23.5 16.9 24.3 26.3 20.7 Faithful 23.8 20.3 23.3 12.3 15.8 26.5 20.3 TPM 18.6 17.1 22.4 13.3 14.4 18.6 17.4 Amazon 20.8 20.9 20.9 16.1 17.8 28.9 20.9 Zero Yatsyn 17.6 18.3 20.6 13.5 16.4 23.5 18.3 Impact 19.4 16.3 19 9.6 13 20.5 16.3 Barmultra 16.2 17.9 24.7 12.1 14.9 18.5 17.4 Polly 18.3 18.2 23.7 15.6 14.9 18.3 18.2 Lbs DM/acre 3-Apr 26-Apr 13-May 13-Jun 31-Jul 3-Nov Tivoli 883 2065 2078 2621 1479 1598 10724 Aberdart 834 2144 2420 2139 1501 1632 10670 Aberavon 967 2143 2888 2672 1052 1353 11075 Faithful 1045 1658 2182 2805 986 1345 10021 TPM 1256 1897 2522 2812 1220 1458 11165 Amazon 1103 1712 2176 2805 1156 1305 10257 Zero Yatsyn 1233 2240 2503 2411 987 1643 11017 Impact 1094 2030 1890 1983 1262 1543 9802 Barmultra 1275 2134 2956 3042 905 1314 11626 Polly 1355 2235 2804 2492 863 1191 10940

Lbs NCS/Acre 3-Apr 26-Apr 13-May 13-Jun 31-Jul 3-Nov Tivoli 184 374 428 343 197 363 1889 Aberdart 118 369 513 263 185 431 1879 Aberavon 119 444 679 452 256 356 2306 Faithful 249 337 508 345 156 356 1951 TPM 234 324 565 374 176 271 1944 Amazon 229 358 455 462 206 377 2087 Zero Yatsyn 217 410 516 325 162 386 2016 Impact 212 331 359 190 164 316 1572 Barmultra 207 382 730 368 135 243 2065 Polly 248 407 665 388 132 218 2058 Conclusion This two-year project has been extremely helpful in characterizing non-structural carbohydrates in cool season grasses. We have learned a lot about the normal flexuations seen across environments and more specifically, variations due to genetic differences. The main conclusions are: 1) Across cool-season forage grasses in the study, level of non-structural carbohydrate and dry matter yield appear to be slightly negatively correlated. 2) Percentages of non-structural carbohydrate are highly variable throughout the growing season and between species and varieties of cool-season forage grasses. 3) Growth rate may affect the level of TNC in cool-season forage grasses. 4) Consistently, the four varieties of orchard grasses contained low levels of TNC and high DM yields. 5) Grasses bred in Europe to emphasize non-structural carbohydrates are higher in sugars than the average of the population found in the US, however, not 25% higher like they are advertised as being.