ph and Low Level (10 ppm) Effects of HB2 Against Campylobacter jejuni

Similar documents
Global Salm-Surv. A global Salmonella surveillance e and laboratory support project. Laboratory Protocols. Step 2 Training Course

ISO revision and further development

Grow Campylobacter and Similar Bacteria Using Less Oxygen. Mary Kay Bates, M.S. Global Cell Culture Specialist

Influence of selective media on Campylobacter detection

EFFECT OF TOMATO GENETIC VARIATION ON LYE PEELING EFFICACY TOMATO SOLUTIONS JIM AND ADAM DICK SUMMARY

Interpretation Guide. Yeast and Mold Count Plate

CAMPYLOBACTER IN MILK ( OR: CHERCHEZ LES CAMPYLOBACTERS IN MILK ) Eva Olsson Engvall

Application Note FP High Sensitivity Coumarin Analysis. Introduction. Keywords

PROFICIENCY TESTS NO 19 AND EURL-Campylobacter National Veterinary Institute

ISO Detection and enumeration of Campylobacter in food and animal feeding stuffs

DNA extraction method as per QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Germany)

EFFECT OF RETAIL-PACKAGING METHODS ON PREMATURE BROWNING OF COOKED BEEF PATTIES. Mari Ann Tørngren & * Niels T. Madsen,

Campylobacter detection in. chicken caeca

Winemaking and Sulfur Dioxide

Effectiveness of the CleanLight UVC irradiation method against pectolytic Erwinia spp.

Counts of Campylobacter spp. on U.S. Broiler Carcasses

DNA Extraction from Radioative Samples Grind plus kit Method

Method 3 (carbon dioxide)

August Instrument Assessment Report. Bactest - Speedy Breedy. Campden BRI

Narrative. Description of Process. REVISED SEPTEMBER 2017 Commercial Processing Example: Wild Salmon Sushi Rolls

The effect of ionized water on germination, sprouting vigour and microbial contamination of wheat sprouts

Effects of ginger on the growth of Escherichia coli

Worm Collection. Prior to next step, determine volume of worm pellet.

ISO/CEN standards for Campylobacter - recent developments - Enne de Boer Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (VWA) The Netherlands

Production, Optimization and Characterization of Wine from Pineapple (Ananas comosus Linn.)

Volume NaOH ph ph/ Vol (ml)

Stuck / Sluggish Wine Treatment Summary

ANTIMICROBIAL EFFECT OF SOUR POMEGRANATE SAUCE ON KISIR, A TRADITIONAL APPETIZER

DETECTION OF CAMPYLOBACTER IN MILK A COLLABORATIVE STUDY

Growing Dairy and Fruit Beverage Categories

Synergistic Effect of Chlorine Dioxide and Drying Treatments for Inactivating Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Radish Seeds

Resolute Reds that endure.

Bacterial Growth and Morphology found in Tea. Biology Department, PSU Kiersten Fullem Chongwen Shi Sebastian Cevallos

Sticking and mold control. TIA Tech 2017 Los Angeles, California Steve Bright

Preventing Salmonella Contamination of Peanut Products. Michael Doyle

Types of Sanitizers. Heat, w/ water or steam to saturate effect

TORELANCE LEVEL OF DIFFERENT CABBAGE VARIETIES TO BLACK ROT BY: MUNENE DAVID M. A22/0081/2009 SUPERVISOR: PROF. DANIEL MUKUNYA

Stratford School Academy Schemes of Work

COOKING HAMBURGERS ON A WEBER OUTDOOR GRILL O. Peter Snyder, Jr., Ph.D.

Don t wash raw chicken. Campylobacter: a concern for us all

WALNUT BLIGHT CONTROL USING XANTHOMONAS JUGLANDIS BUD POPULATION SAMPLING

Exploring Attenuation. Greg Doss Wyeast Laboratories Inc. NHC 2012

Guidelines for Validation of Dry Roasting Processes

Conducting a Validation

Separation of Ovotransferrin and Ovomucoid from Chicken Egg White

A Microbiological survey of campylobacter contamination in fresh whole UK produced chilled chickens at retail sale ( )

Notes on acid adjustments:

# 5278 JALAPENO CHEESE SAUCE (BAG)

TEMPERATURE CONDITIONS AND TOLERANCE OF AVOCADO FRUIT TISSUE

The Food Regulation and Farmers Markets in Alberta. Kelly Bauer, Public Health Inspector Alberta Health Services, Rocky Mountain House May 15, 2014

LACTIC ACID BACTERIA (OIV-Oeno , Oeno )

HEMPAGUARD X5 and HEMPAGUARD X7: Novel ActiGuard -based Fouling Defence technology

MILK PROCESSING AND PRESERVATION

VITAMIN B12 PRODUCTION BY Propionibacterium shermanil In Tempeh Warawut Krusong, Busaba Yongsmith* and Priscilla C. Sanchez**

MIC305 Stuck / Sluggish Wine Treatment Summary

MflTERIfiLS ffnd METHODS

Use of a Scald Additive to Reduce Levels of Salmonella Typhimurium During Poultry Processing

Acidity and ph Analysis

Review for Lab 1 Artificial Selection

Citrus Fruit Antimicrobial Effects. By John Seabrooke Central Catholic High School Grade 9

All About Sushi. AFDO June 2018 Cathy Feeney

Jeremy Hall. Bernard Matthews Ltd. Tackling public enemy number one Campylobacter

Mixtures and Solutions Stations Lesson Plan by Clara Welch Based on FOSS & Kitchen Chemistry by John Bath, Ph. D. and Sally Mayberry, Ed. D.

MAKING WINE WITH HIGH AND LOW PH JUICE. Ethan Brown New Mexico State University 11/11/2017

# 2356 NACHO CHEESE SAVORY

INFLUENCE OF THIN JUICE ph MANAGEMENT ON THICK JUICE COLOR IN A FACTORY UTILIZING WEAK CATION THIN JUICE SOFTENING

Forestry, Leduc, AB, T9E 7C5, Canada. Agriculture/Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada. *

TESTING WINE STABILITY fining, analysis and interpretation

Monk fruit (luo han guo) Siraitia grosvenorii. By:! Ye Ren! Catherine Tao Yang! Biyu Lei! YukSin Lo! Rachel Kim!

DRAFT TANZANIA STANDARD

Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Radish Seeds by Sequential Treatments with

Specific Yeasts Developed for Modern Ethanol Production

Product Name and Number: 2390 Cheddar EZ Document #: Revision Date: 04/10/2015 Revision #: 1.0 Revision Reason: New Product Reviser: JS

(C) Global Journal of Advance Engineering Technology and Sciences

SCENARIO Propose a scenario (the hypothesis) for bacterial succession in each type of milk:

Brewing Water Derek Colby

The challenge of tackling Campylobacter in Belgium

Mathur Agar This medium is made up of the following reagents: dextrose, magnesium sulfate, potassium phosphate, neopeptone, yeast extract, and agar.

Materials and Methods

ECOBULK WINE-STORE-AGE HIGHEST FOOD SAFETY AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS IN WINE PRODUCTION

September is NATIONAL PREPAREDNESS MONTH

STABILIZATION OPTIONS. For Sweet Wines before Bottling

ing substances are as shown in the following table.

RESOLUTION OIV-OENO

Case Histories: Biocide Interactions and. Tolerance/Resistance to Biocides in the Paper Making Process

International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Bioresearch

Pressurized Yoghurt as a Carrier of Probiotic Bacteria

Microbial and Physicochemical Characteristics of Locally Produced Pineapple Juice Treated with Garlic and Ginger

Sethness Caramel Colors are Proudly Non-GMO Project Verified NON GMO. Project. What is the Non-GMO Project?

# 2391 WHITE CHEDDAR EZ

Chicken Products: Fact Sheet

VACUUM PACKAGING EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT T : / F :

Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) a small fruit tree

Public Health. (Received 8 April 2011/Accepted 23 August 2011/Published online in J-STAGE 6 September 2011)

An Economic And Simple Purification Procedure For The Large-Scale Production Of Ovotransferrin From Egg White

TEMPORARY FOOD SERVICE GUIDE

CAMPYLOBACTER DETECTION IN FOOD USING AN ELISA-BASED METHOD

FOOD ESTABLISHMENT INSPECTION REPORT

AN ENOLOGY EXTENSION SERVICE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION

Transcription:

ph and Low Level (10 ppm) Effects of HB2 Against Campylobacter jejuni Background/Purpose The contamination of food products by pathogenic organisms such as Salmonella or Campylobacter is an on-going problem that is addressed within the processing plant using antimicrobial products. The efficacy of Food Contact Substances (FCS) is important to assure a safe and reliable food supply. Poultry processing facilities are adopting new and improved chemical intervention steps of treating their poultry with FDA approved sanitizers as part of their HACCP programs. One of these new FCS approved for use by the FSIS is liquid hypobromous acid (HB2). This laboratory has shown the increased sensitivity (efficacy) of Salmonella at elevated ph regimes, particularly in the 7.5-8.5 range, and it important to establish if any ph response to hypobromous acid is evident for Campylobacter. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether ph adjustment of available bromine (Br 2 ) from activated HB2 has any impact on the relative efficacy against Campylobacter jejuni. Low challenge concentrations were chosen so the effects of the exposure could be tracked over reasonable time periods. Methods Test Systems: Campylobacter jejuni bacteria (ATCC 33291) Campylobacter jejuni bacteria (ATCC 33291) were cultured in Bolton Broth (Sigma Aldrich, lot number BCBB7257) containing 5% defibrinated sheep blood (Hardy Diagnostics, lot number 11243) by microaerophilic incubation (~20% oxygen) for two days at 42 o C. The bacteria were separated from the nutrient broth by centrifugation. One ml of the concentrated bacteria mixture was removed and plated on Campy Cefex Agar (Hardy Diagnostics, lot number 10315). This was repeated eight times to achieve a total of eight Campylobacter inoculated Campy Cefex Agar plates. The plates were kept under a microaerophilic atmosphere and incubated for 48 hours at 42 o C. After two days, the surfaces of the six 1

Campylobacter inoculated Campy Cefex Agar plates were aseptically scraped using a sterile L- shaped spreader to remove as many of the Campylobacter colonies as possible. The bacteria colonies were carefully resuspended in approximately 1550 ml of sterile phosphate buffer. The amount of Campylobacter jejuni bacteria was measured in the Campylobacter/phosphate buffer solution, to serve as the control, by serial dilution and plating on Campy Cefex Agar (Hardy Diagnostics, lot number 10315). Immediately thereafter, the remaining solution was split into three 500 ml samples. The three 500 ml samples were used to demonstrate the efficacy of 10 ppm Br 2 (from HB2) against Campylobacter jejuni at three different phs. Test Material Preparation: HB-2 activation occurs by blending hydrogen bromide with a hypochlorite source. For this study, hypobromous acid was created on-site by combining hydrogen bromide (HB-2) and sodium hypochlorite. The actual Br 2 concentration measured before use in the experiment was approximately 3000 ppm as Br 2. This concentrated stock solution was then used to dose the three test solutions to 10 ppm available bromine (Br 2 ). One at a time, a calculated amount of the concentrated stock solution was introduced to one of the 500 g test material samples. Immediately thereafter, the actual concentration of the test material was measured by using the modified DPD method (U.S. patent no. 7,651,724, Howarth and Harvey) and a HACH Chlorine Colorimeter. The value was multiplied by the mole weight ratio of chlorine to bromine (2.25), and the dilution factor of the test material. Each solution was adjusted to either ph 6, ph 7 of ph 8 (±0.1) using either hydrochloric acid or sodium hydroxide. At the 1, 5, 10 and 20 minute time intervals the ph and actual concentrations of the test solutions were measured using the Modified DPD method. All plating was done in duplicate. One ml of the test solution was removed and plated without dilution on Campy Cefex Agar at 1, 5, 10 and 20 minute time intervals. At the same time another ml of each of the test solution was removed, serially diluted to 10-2 and 10-4 (using 99 ml Butterfield s Buffer) and subsequently plated on Campy Cefex Agar. 2

After plating, all Campy Cefex Agar Plates (including the control) were incubated under microaerophilic conditions for 48 hours at 42 o C. After incubation, the plates were enumerated. Results and Discussion During the challenge testing, the residual Br 2, as well as the ph, was measured at the 1, 5, 10, and 20 minute time intervals. This data is reported in Table 1. It can be seen that over the course of the 20 minute contact time, the ph remained relatively stable throughout. However, the Br 2 concentration steadily declined throughout the test period at each ph, and was faster for the ph 8 sample compared to the ph 6 and ph 7 sample. Table 1: Campylobacter ph and Residual Br 2 (ppm) ph 6 ph 7 ph 8 Time (min) ph ppm Br 2 ph ppm Br 2 ph ppm Br 2 0 5.90 9.45 7.03 9.45 8.08 9.68 1 min 5.94 9.45 7.04 9.45 8.07 9.45 5 min 5.96 8.33 7.04 7.88 8.03 7.20 10 min 5.99 6.75 7.05 7.88 8.03 6.75 20 min 6.04 6.75 7.06 6.75 8.01 5.85 Table 2 shows the microbiological results of the Campylobacter jejuni suspension before treatment with Br 2, and at 1, 5, 10, and 20 minutes after the samples were dosed to a nominal 10 ppm Br 2. It can be seen that the Br 2 at 10 ppm remains effective from ph 6 to ph 8. The Campylobacter was eradicated between 5 and 10 minutes in all three solutions. As expected, the longer the contact time, the more bacteria was eradicated. 3

Table 2: Campylobacter Microbiological Results ph (time) Log 10 CFU/ml Remaining Log 10 Reduction Before treatment (ph 6) 5.53 N/A ( 1 min) 0.78 4.75 (99.998%) Before treatment (ph 7) 5.53 N/A (1 min) 0.85 4.68 (99.998%) Before treatment (ph 8) 5.53 N/A (1 min) 0.70 4.83 (99.998%) Conclusions The purpose of this study was to determine whether ph adjustment of hypobromous acid solutions (from activated HB2) may affect the efficacy against Campylobacter bacteria in these artificial ph environments. In this experiment, cultures of Campylobacter jejuni were challenged at ph s 6, 7, and 8 at 10 ppm Br 2 (from HB2). The microbiological results shown in Table 2 clearly demonstrate that there is no difference in Br 2 efficacy against Campylobacter when comparing the three different phs, i.e. Br 2 is equally effective over the ph 6 to ph 8 range. As expected, the log 10 reduction in bacteria increased as the contact time increased. The R&D department of Enviro Tech Chemical Services has performed similar challenge studies using different antimicrobials (such as peracetic acid) against 4

Campylobacter at different phs. The data obtained from those studies prove that the efficacy of the antimicrobial against Campylobacter was not dependent on ph. What was attempted here was to provide data that correlates with data previously obtained, but this time using the antimicrobial HB2. This study clearly confirms that using activated HB2 over a ph range of 6-8 has no significant effect on the relative efficacy of the HB2 on the Campylobacter under in the conditions used in this test. It also confirms that peracetic acid solutions similarly had no change in efficacy under the same conditions, therefore it is concluded that Campylobacter is not a ph sensitive organism. Tina Rodrigues, B.S. September 15, 2011 5