Ulllted States Patent [19] [11] Patent Number: Plant 11,193

Similar documents
Sugar maple tree named Legacy

(12) United States Plant Patent

(12) Plant Patent Application Publication

(12) Plant Patent Application Publication

(12) Plant Patent Application Publication

US PP12,350 P2 Jan. 15, 2002

(12) United States Plant Patent (10) Patent N0.: US PP18,761 P3 Braun

(12) United States Plant Patent

(12) United States Plant Patent

(12) United States Plant Patent

III. United States Patent 19 Martin et al. 30 crop just two years from planting which is considered

No Characters No. of samples Methods Rank or measurement unit Remarks

(12) United States Plant Patent

(12) United States Plant Patent

(12) United States Plant Patent

United States Patent (19) Grant et al.

(12) United States Plant Patent McCown et al.

(22 Filed: Feb. 8, 1988 s (51l Int. Cl."... A015/ U.S. C... Plt./88

(12) Plant Patent Application Publication

Part 1: Naming the cultivar

(12) Plant Patent Application Publication

United States Patent (19)

(*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this E. E. E. E. O.C.

Key words: fruit breeding, cultivar description, pollenizer, tetraploidy, few-seeded fruit

GALA SPLITTING WASHINGTON TREE FRUIT POSTHARVEST CONFERENCE. March 13 th & 14 th, 2001, Wenatchee, WA PROCEEDINGS, Gala Splitting page 1 of 6

REPORT OF THE SUBTROPICAL FRUIT COMMITTEE

(12) United States Plant Patent

Malus domestica Geneva Early

AMERICAN CAMELLIA SOCIETY VARIETY REGISTRATION

2018 Small Fruit Plant Sale Variety Information

Prunus x yedoensis Daybreak

No Characters No. of samples Methods Rank or measurement unit Remarks

2019 Small Fruit Plant Sale Variety Information

Week Num, Northern H

Please do not write on or remove from the classroom.

Coast Live Oak Breaking leaf buds Young leaves Flowers or flower buds Open flowers Pollen release Fruits Ripe fruits Recent fruit drop

FLASH GALA Quality Manual 2018

Fruit Set, Growth and Development

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

2019 Annual 4-H Plant Sale

HISTORY USES AND HEALTH BENEFITS. Figure 31. Nanking cherries

(12) United States Plant Patent

Unit E: Fruit and Nut Production. Lesson 6: Production of Pomegranate

MALUMA HASS : A NEW RELEASED CULTIVAR IN COMPARISON WITH HASS

MALUMA HASS : A NEW RELEASED CULTIVAR IN COMPARISON WITH HASS

Help Support Alamance County 4-H

III. United States Patent (19) Binacchi. Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Bucknam and Archer 57 ABSTRACT. 6 Claims, 3 Drawing Sheets

Plant Profiles: HORT 2242 Landscape Plants II

Help Support Alamance County 4-H

Cacanska.Lepotica. Prunus domestica Bluefre. Prunus domestica Peachy

Harvest Maturity Report #9

Fruit Tree List. Apples

United States Standards for Grades of Walnuts (Juglans regia) in the Shell

Stefano Musacchi. Interpera 2017 Wenatchee, WA June 15-16, Department of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA

AVOCADO VARIETIES RECENTLY REGISTERED WITH THE CALIFORNIA AVOCADO SOCIETY

SELF-POLLINATED HASS SEEDLINGS

Figure #1 Within the ovary, the ovules may have different arrangements within chambers called locules.

FRUIT TREES/SHRUBS 2014

(12) Plant Patent Application Publication

Somatic Mutation of Tea Plants Induced by y-irradiation

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1

MSU Fruit Team 2010 Apple Maturity Report

European Community common position on. Agenda Item 4 b) CODEX COMMITTEE ON FRESH FRUITS AND VEGETABLES (12 th Session)

Magnolia (Magnoliaceae)

(12) United States Plant Patent

EAPVPF EAST ASIA PLANT VARIETY PROTECTION FORUM. Papaya. Carica papaya L. GUIDELINES FOR THE CONDUCT OF TESTS

Determination of Fruit Sampling Location for Quality Measurements in Melon (Cucumis melo L.)

AVOCADOS IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY

STEM ELONGATION AND RUNNERING IN THE MUTANT STRAWBERRY, FRAGARIA VESCA L.

CODEX STANDARD FOR CANNED APRICOTS CODEX STAN

THE EVALUATION OF WALNUT VARIETIES FOR CALIFORNIA S CENTRAL COAST REGION 2007 HARVEST

Early St. Ann : A New Early Maturing Satsuma Mandarin

Harvest Maturity Report #6

Classification and Botanical Description of Imported Varieties of Hops (Humulus lupulus) in Nelson, New Zealand

Commiphora drakebrochmanii

US A United States Patent 19 11) Patent Number: 5,607,072 Rigney et al. (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 4, 1997

CODEX STANDARD FOR CANNED TOMATOES 1 CODEX STAN

AND ROOTSTOCKS IDENTIFICATION OF NURSERY STOCK PEACH, PEAR, AND PLUM VARIETIES APRICOT, CHERRY, gp^ft, ONT.. CANADA* NOVEMBER, 1954 APPLE,

THE EFFECT OF GIRDLING ON FRUIT QUALITY, PHENOLOGY AND MINERAL ANALYSIS OF THE AVOCADO TREE

Harvest Maturity Report #10

2017 Annual 4-H Plant Sale

7. LOCALIZATION OF FRUIT ON THE TREE, BRANCH GIRDLING AND FRUIT THINNING

2018 Fruit Trees All fruit trees are semi-dwarf (15-20 ft. tall) unless otherwise noted.

FALL TO WINTER CRANBERRY PLANT HARDINESS

Agriculture & Natural Resources

OPE MANCfb. A New, High Quality, Late-Ripening Mango Variety 'DARY. JUL : HAWAIIAN COLLECTION i-cp L. R. A. HAMIL TON. Circular 60

PECANS. Office (850) Green.com. We Sell Clean Air Machines!

How to identify American chestnut trees. American Chestnut Tree. Identification Resources. For the Appalachian Trail Mega-Transect.

Fungal Fungal Disease Citrus Black Black Spot Guignardia Guignardia citricarpa ): Id I entifi f catio ion io, Biology Biology and and Control

OLEACEAE OLIVE FAMILY

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

LA Early : A New Early Market Satsuma

Do the Kanza and Excel pecan cultivars have a place in Georgia orchards?

CYPERACEAE SEDGE FAMILY

Fruit Maturity and Quality. Jim Mattheis USDA, ARS Tree Fruit Research Laboratory, Wenatchee, WA

Performance of cool-climate grape varieties in Delta County. Horst Caspari Colorado State University Western Colorado Research Center

american persimmon Creating Canopy 2019 Diospyros virginiana unusual fruit tree (native) height at maturity: feet spread at maturity: feet

GANTER NURSERY: FRUIT TREES 2018

GRAPES. Stop watering the end of August or first of September to harden off grape vines for winter. Keep foliage dry - don't overhead water.

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station

Transcription:

USOOPP11193P Ulllted States Patent [19] [11] Patent Number: Plant 11,193 Van Leuven [45] Date of Patent: Jan. 25, 2000 [54] APPLE TREE NAMED FIERO [56] References Cited [75] Inventor: Myles Van Leuven, KenneWick, Wash. U'S' PATENT DOCUMENTS P.P. 10,141 12/1997 Auvil..... Flt/34.1 [73] Asslgnee (ilolmtnl?la sévol?anagan Nursery Primary Examiner HoWard J. Locker ena C 6e as ' Assistant Examiner Melissa L. Kimball Attorney, Agent, or Firm Klarquist Sparkman Campbell [21] Appl. No.: 08/962,529 Leigh & Whinston [22] Filed: Oct. 31, 1997 [57] ABSTRACT A new and distinct variety of apple tree named Fiero [51] Int. c1.7..... A01H 5/00 Characterized by early maturity, manning 10 to 14 days earlier than ( Yataka Fuji ) and 30 to 40 days earlier than standard Fuji, and an overall pinkish red blush coloration [52] US. Cl...... Plt./168 in Contrast to the predominantly striped pattern of coloration typical of ( Yataka Fuji ) and standard Fuji. [58] Field of Search..... Plt./34.1, 168 6 Drawing Sheets 1 2 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention comprises a new and distinct vari ety of apple tree, referred to by the varietal name Fiero. The original tree of the new variety Was discovered by me in 1992 as a Whole tree mutation in a block of an early Fuji ( Yataka Fuji, U.S. Plant Pat. No. 7,001) being grown in a cultivated area in Prescott, Wash. I noticed that this single tree, planted in 1991, had an earlier apple maturity than other trees in the block of the same age. Speci?cally, apples from trees of my new variety mature about mid-september in central Washington state. By comparison, apples from Yataka trees, an early Fuji strain, normally mature in late September to early October, and apples from standard Fuji (not patented) trees mature in late October to early Novem ber. Apples from trees of my new variety also have a more intense blushed color than Yataka apples. The Fiero variety Was compared to other Fuji strains, as set forth or speci?ed below, and, particularly to the Yataka variety and standard Fuji. Fruit from all the compared strains Were grown in Prescott, Wash. and Were from trees of similar age. This invention has not been observed under all possible environmental conditions. HoWever, the following combi nation of traits have been repeatedly observed in asexually propagated progeny (asexually propagated by grafting both at Prescott, Wash., and in Wenatchee, Wash.) and are the basic characteristics of this invention that in combination distinguish this variety of apple as a new and distinct variety: (1) matures 10 to 14 days earlier (about mid-september in central Washington) than Yataka and 30 to 40 days earlier than standard Fuji or any of the so-called higher color mutations of standard Fuji, e.g., Nagafu 2, Nagafu 6, Nagafu 12, BC 1, and Akifu 1 (all unpatented) and of the patented strains TAC 114 (US. Plant Pat. No. 8,032) and Myra (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 9,645); and (2) an overall pinkish red blush coloration in contrast to the predominantly striped pattern of coloration typical of Yataka and standard Fuji. AseXual reproduction shows that these characteristics are established and transmitted through succeeding asexual propagations. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The following photographs illustrate typical characteris tics of the new variety as noted, With color being as true as 10 15 25 35 40 is reasonably possible to make the same in this type of color photograph. FIG. 1 is a view of typical fruit of Fiero on a tree. FIG. 2 is a close-up view of?owers of Fiero. FIG. 3 is a view of vegetative shoots of Fiero. FIG. 4 is a comparison of fruit-bearing branches of Fiero and BC 2. FIG. 5 is a comparison of the degree of starch conversion in fruits of Fiero and BC 2 (not patented). The upper row includes (from left to right) a Whole Fiero fruit, a trans versely sectioned Fiero fruit, a transversely sectioned BC 2 fruit, and a Whole BC 2 fruit. The lower row includes (from left to right) two halves of a Fiero fruit and two halves of a BC 2 fruit, each of Which is stained With iodine. Photograph taken Sep. 13, 1995. FIG. 6 depicts eight horizontal rows of iodine-stained fruit, each row containing two halves of a fruit from the variety identi?ed in the row to compare the degree of starch conversion in fruit of the following Fuji clones: Fiero ; F-4 selection; early Fuji selection; Yataka ; TAC 114 ; BC-2 ; Nagafu 12 ; and Nagafu 6 (of these strains, only Yataka (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 7,001) and TAC 114 (US. Plant Pat. No. 8,032) are patented). The FIG. 6 photograph Was taken Sep. 19, 1996, and shows that much more of the starch has been converted in Fiero fruit in the top row than in the fruit of the other varieties. DETAILED DESCRIPTION The following is a detailed description of the invention based on plants produced under orchard practices at Broetje Orchards, Prescott, Wash., and observed at this location from 1992 to 1997. Plants Were also produced and observed at C&O Nurseries, Wenatchee, Wash. Color references are made in accordance With the Munsell Limited Color Cascade, except Where general color terms of ordinary dictionary signi?cance is obvious. All trees of the new variety, insofar as I have been able to observe them, have been identical in all the characteristics described below. All measurements are an average of 10 typical samples.

3 Species: Malus pumila Mill. Parentage: Whole tree mutation of Yataka Fuji. Propagation: Holds to distinguishing characteristics through succeeding propagation by grafting. Locality Where grown and observed: Prescott, Wash., and Wenatchee, Wash. Dates of?rst and last picking: September 13 to 26. Trees: Size. Medium. Vigor similar to, but less than, stan dard Fuji. Habit. SomeWhat spreading. T runk. Stocky, smooth, gray-green to light brown (Munsell Color 7.5 YR 4/2). Branches. Spreading, Wide angles. Dormant one-year-ola' shoot. Medium thickness (8.3 mm), reddish brown to light brown (Munsell Color 10 RP 3/2), lenticels cream colored, elongated, medium in density and size, about 1 mm. Internodes. Average internodes length on one-year Leaves: old Broad, shoot dark medium green, (32 medium glossy on upper surface,?nely pubescent on lower surface. Size. Broad. Length 70 105 mm, average 87 mm. Width 47 55 mm, average 52 mm. Color. Upper surface, dark green (Munsell Color 10 GY 2/4 10 to GY 3/4); lower surface, medium green (Munsell Color 10 GY 4/4 10 to GY 5/4). Margin. Serrate. Tip. Sharply pointed. Petiole. Medium, 20 25 mm, medium thick, 1.7 1.9 mm,?nely pubescent, yellow green (Munsell Color 5 GY 6/6). Sttpules. Insigni?cant, in pairs, pointed 5 mm in length. FloWer: Identical to Yataka Fuji. First bloom midseason, just before or after Apr. 20, 1997, in Prescott, Wash. Full bloom approximately Apr. 27, 1997. Size. Medium-large, about 50 mm. Color. Purplish pink When unopened, White When opened. Petals, position of margins. Touching to overlapping. Stamen. Single row, anthers bright yellow. Pistil. Stigma medium length,?at at top, rounded at base; styles medium, fused at base. Sepals. Medium size, pubescent. Pollination requirements. Compatible With all cultivars, except Fuji and its sports, that bloom in the same time period. Fruit: Maturity When described Was mid-harvest period (mid-september);?rmness 18 20 pounds; soluble solids 14 16%; starch index (1 6 scale) 3.0-3.5. SiZe: Medium to large, 83.6 mm to 74.4 mm (280-350 grams). Form. Round to occasionally oblong, usually symmetric, length/diameter ratio approximately 1:1, With ribbing absent, a slight crowning at the distal (calyx) end, With lobes either absent or inconspicu ous. Cavity. Broad, medium depth (15 Basin. Medium to deep (11 14 mm), Wide (30-35 mm), slightly pubescent. Stem. Medium length (26 mm), medium thickness (2.2 Calyx. Medium size, lobes convergent from base toward center,?nely pubescent, calyx closed. Locales (carpels). Medium to small, closed. Skin: Smooth, Without bloom, lacking greasiness. Medium thickness, With no tendency toward cracking. Russeting Plant 11,193 4 generally absent, but similar to standard Fuji, Which can show occasional russet caused by environment or caustic sprays. Russet, Where found, Was on exposed cheek or around the base. Ground color. YelloW-green (Munsell Color 5 Y 8/10). Lenticels. Medium in size and density, overall effect inconspicuous. Color: White to light tan. Overcolor. Pinkish to red blush (Munsell Color 5 R 4/ 10), With indistinct striping prior to autumn matu rity. Range of overcolor 60 100%, depending upon exposure. General color e? ect. Higher red color at comparable maturity than either early Fuji clones or standard Fuji, and more like the unpatented red Fuji strains, BC-2, Nagafu 2, and Nagafu 12. Flesh. YelloWish White in color, very juicy, sweet (14.0 to 16.0 Brix), acidity low (approximately 0.4% malic acid);?rmness at harvest 18 pounds, some What coarse, nonastringent and mild in?avor. Gen eral dessert quality is excellent, very similar to other Fuji strains. Core. Round shape, small to medium size. Seed cells closed. Seeds. 8 12 fully developed seeds, obovate shape, medium size, adhering strongly to the carpel Wall. Length: 7 mm. Breadth: 4 mm. Color. BroWn. Use. Fresh eating, dessert. Storage. Keeping quality is maintained for up to 8 months in CA, 4 to 5 months in common storage at 32 F. (0 C.). Productivity. Production to date has been identical to that of adjacent Fuji trees. Fruit is borne predomi nantly on spurs and terminally on short shoots. Some tendency toward alternate bearing, similar to stan dard Fuji, but easily controllable by proper thin ning. Resistance to pests and disease, hardiness: No apparent difference from standard Fuji in susceptibility to insects and diseases. No evidence of Winter damage or frost damage different from standard Fuji. The earlier maturity date of fruit of my new Fiero variety is demonstrated by the greater starch conversion of my new variety in comparison to that of other varieties. In FIGS. 5 and 6, sectioned fruit are stained With iodine, Which stains starch a purplish-black. Darker fruits have more starch and thus a lower degree of maturity. Fruits of Fiero display signi?cantly lighter staining that the other varieties tested, demonstrating their earlier maturity. The early maturity date of my new variety is also apparent from the average harvest date. In particular, in Prescott, Wash., average harvest dates have been observed as follows: Strain Ave. Harvest Date Fiero September 13-20 Early Fuji F-4 strain September 18-25 Early Fuji ( Yataka fuji ) September 23-27 TAC 114 (PP 8,032) October 13-20 Myra (PP 9,645) October 10-22 BC 2 October 18-25 Nagafu 12 October 18-25 Nagafu 6 October 20-30

5 Fruit of my new variety have an overall pinkish red blush over a substantial percentage of the surface area in combi nation with the early maturity. This is apparent from FIG. 4, showing BC 2 fruit and Fiero fruit on a side by side comparison and also from the following table: Plant 11,193 6 -continued Strain Color Pattern Amount blush Nagafu 6 Striped, some 50-70% blush Strain Color Pattern Amount Fiero Pink-red blush 60 100% Early Fuji F-4 strain Red blush 60% Early Fuji ( Yataka fuji ) Red stripe 30-50% TAC 114 Red stripe + blush 50-80% Myra Pink blush and stripe 50-80% BC 2 Mostly red blush 60-90% Nagafu 12 Light stripe + 60-90% My Fiero variety thus represents a new and highly desirable new Fuji cultivar. I claim: 1. Anew and distinct variety of apple tree as herein shown and described.

U S Patent Jan. 25,2000 Sheet 1 0f 6 Plant 11,193

U.S. Patent Jan. 25,2000 Sheet 2 of6 Plant 11,193

U S Patent Jan. 25,2000 Sheet 3 0f 6 Plant 11,193

U.S. Patent Jan. 25,2000 Sheet 4 of6 Plant 11,193

U.S. Patent Jan. 25,2000 Sheet 5 of6 Plant 11,193

U S Patent Jan. 25,2000 Sheet 6 0f 6 Plant 11,193