RISK ASSESSMENT DEPT. OF AGROINDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY FACULTY OF AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITAS BRAWIJAYA

Similar documents
MULTICRITERIA DECISION AIDING

Decision making with incomplete information Some new developments. Rudolf Vetschera University of Vienna. Tamkang University May 15, 2017

Week 5 Objectives. Subproblem structure Greedy algorithm Mathematical induction application Greedy correctness

An application of cumulative prospect theory to travel time variability

Demand, Supply and Market Equilibrium. Lecture 4 Shahid Iqbal

Introduction to Management Science Midterm Exam October 29, 2002

Chapter 3 Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

Buying Filberts On a Sample Basis

Missing value imputation in SAS: an intro to Proc MI and MIANALYZE

Boston Room and Lounge Bar. Up to 150 persons seated meal/disco or buffet Up to 200 persons theatre-style seating/presentations

2016 China Dry Bean Historical production And Estimated planting intentions Analysis

HERZLIA MIDDLE SCHOOL

The University of Georgia

Table A.1: Use of funds by frequency of ROSCA meetings in 9 research sites (Note multiple answers are allowed per respondent)

Starbucks BRAZIL. Presentation Outline

Fairtrade. What it has to offer and how we can use it

DELAWARE COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU, INC. Proposed Excess Loss (Pure Premium) Factors

Mango Market Profile

THE COLLECTIVE MARKETS - STALLHOLDER INFORMATION

Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model. Pearson Education Limited All rights reserved.

Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

Preview. Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

1/17/manufacturing-jobs-used-to-pay-really-well-notanymore-e/

HONDURAS. A Quick Scan on Improving the Economic Viability of Coffee Farming A QUICK SCAN ON IMPROVING THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF COFFEE FARMING

CE 167: Engineering and Project Management Professor William Ibbs Fall 2010

2004 PICKLING LINE MARKET STUDY

Contesting the Meaning of Fair Trade Policy and Practice:

Cut the cost of coffee in an instant

Booking Information. Payment Information

How Many of Each Kind?

Relation between Grape Wine Quality and Related Physicochemical Indexes

Vineyard Cash Flows Tremain Hatch

North San Joaquin Valley Almond Day

Coffee and climate change. Effectively guiding forward looking climate change adaptation of global coffee supply chains

The premium for organic wines

Sustainable Coffee Economy

Lesson 9: Tables of Equivalent Ratios

RIZE ONE 3D PRINTER SPEEDS PART TURNAROUND 20%, SAVES MILLIONS FOR CONSUMER PACKAGED GOODS MANUFACTURER

About the EcoFocus Trend Study

Cotton Crop Maturity Determination

Developments in the legislation on food hygiene related with VTEC Kris De Smet European Commission GD SANCO, Unit G4 Food, alert system and training

Joy the Baker Rationalizing in Baking

VisitScotland Food & Drink QA Scheme. Taste Our Best. Criteria/Guidance Notes. Visitor Attractions

Preview. Introduction (cont.) Introduction. Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost (cont.) Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost

Preview. Introduction. Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

PENNSYLVANIA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU. Proposed Excess Loss (Pure Premium) Factors

SHEA ROASTING IN A NUTSHELL. Brian Gylland (& Paul Means) Burn Design Lab ETHOS January 26-28, 2018

The China Wine Barometer (CWB): a look into the future

Assessment of Management Systems of Wineries in Armenia

SUMMER HOUSE WEDDING RECEPTION, PRIVATE DINNERS OR FUNCTIONS

Economic and environmental feasibility study of water hyacinth briquette in Cirata Reservoir

We give priority to speaker requests that make the most significant contribution to achieving our priorities

FIRST MIDTERM EXAM. Economics 452 International Trade Theory and Policy Spring 2010

Seda s Double Wall insulated cups: The Original Double Wall

A BETTER WAY TO ENJOY GOOD FOOD. EatGood

Crea%ng value is our business

Vi at Bentley Village Dining Reservations Orientation

Coffee Eco-labeling: Profit, Prosperity, & Healthy Nature? Brian Crespi Andre Goncalves Janani Kannan Alexey Kudryavtsev Jessica Stern

Measuring economic value of whale conservation

Financing Decisions of REITs and the Switching Effect

VineAlert An Economic Impact Analysis

Thought: The Great Coffee Experiment

DETERMINATION OF FRYING TEMPERATURE AND VACUUM PRESSURE TO PRODUCE PINEAPPLE CHIPS USING SIMPLE VACUUM FRIER *)

FACTORS DETERMINING UNITED STATES IMPORTS OF COFFEE

RESEARCH UPDATE from Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute by Natalia Kolyesnikova, PhD Tim Dodd, PhD THANK YOU SPONSORS

Level 2 Mathematics and Statistics, 2016

Organic wine from common problems to shared achievements through a research project ORWINE. Cristina Micheloni AIAB

Leading the Category Driving Growth Creating Value. Fiona KENDRICK Head of Coffee and Beverages Strategic Business Unit

New U.K. Foodservice Consumer Report

Smart Specialisation Strategy for REMTh: setting priorities

Online Appendix to. Are Two heads Better Than One: Team versus Individual Play in Signaling Games. David C. Cooper and John H.

Applying ISO 9001 to Baking Cookies

THE STATISTICAL SOMMELIER

Metallized Polyester Film Capacitors (MKT) in Plastic Case B B Standard applications

Catering Terms & Conditions Battersea Park London Wednesday 5 & Thursday 6 July 2017

Flexible Working Arrangements, Collaboration, ICT and Innovation

Grocery List (Step 2)

Functions Modeling Change A Preparation for Calculus Third Edition

Regression Models for Saffron Yields in Iran

Analysis of Things (AoT)

Welcome to ZimFest Live Please read the enclosed terms and conditions. A stall pitch will be allocated to you on your arrival.

INDEX. Introduction 2. Market size 3. How it works? Tap4.Menu as a global platform? How do we monetize the business? How does the RTO work? 8. 9.

TURNING A MEAL INTO AN EXPERIENCE 2018 RESTAURANT INDUSTRY REPORT

The challenge of tackling Campylobacter in Belgium

Wine Club CONSISTENTLY ACHIEVING HIGH RATINGS EVERY YEAR DESPITE WHAT MOTHER NATURE THROWS AT US. THIS IS THE HUNTER FAMILY PROMISE TO YOU.

and the World Market for Wine The Central Valley is a Central Part of the Competitive World of Wine What is happening in the world of wine?

POSITION DESCRIPTION

FBA STRATEGIES: HOW TO START A HIGHLY PROFITABLE FBA BUSINESS WITHOUT BIG INVESTMENTS

Costa Rica: In Depth Coffee Report: COFFEE INDUSTRY STRUCTURE

EWWR good practices and case studies

Section D - What Should They Learn?

GENOTYPIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ON BREAD-MAKING QUALITY OF WINTER WHEAT IN ROMANIA

A Comparison of X, Y, and Boomer Generation Wine Consumers in California

Economics Homework 4 Fall 2006

Ergon Energy Corporation Limited 21 July 2010


Composition and Value of Loin Primals

STARBUCKS CORPORATION

Economics 101 Spring 2019 Answers to Homework #1 Due Thursday, February 7 th, Directions:

Fairtrade a sustainable choice

Transcription:

RISK ASSESSMENT DEPT. OF AGROINDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY FACULTY OF AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITAS BRAWIJAYA

RISK ASSESSMENT To determine relative priority and get information to solve it Risk that should be assessed/measured: Dimension (frequency, number of lossess) Determine how serious if the risk happens be carefull with the effect of risk Risk assessment by probability distribution EOL, EVPI, EPV

RISK ASSESSMENT METHODS 1. EOL (Expected Opportunity Loss) A number of loss pay off because we dont choose the alternative action priciple: minimize losses because we choose a specific alternative Rationally, we choose the smallest EOL value to avoid the dissatisfaction/regret in the future

EXAMPLE OF EOL An entrepreneur wanna invest his money to one of this business alternatives: shrimp ponds, food stalls and music studios, with consideration of good economic growth rate (probability 0.4) and bad (0.6). Data seen in Table, what is the best decision for the entrepreneur based on EOL????

FIRST TABLE OF EXPECTED OPPORTUNITY LOSS Business Alternative Economic Growth rate Good (0,4) Bad (0,6) Shrimp ponds 50.000 10.000 Food stalls 20.000 60.000 Music studio 100.000 50.000

FIRST TABLE OF EXPECTED OPPORTUNITY LOSS Business Alternative Economic Growth rate Good (0,4) Bad (0,6) Shrimp ponds 50.000 10.000 Food stalls 20.000 60.000 Music studio 100.000 50.000

PAY OFF TABLE (COMPARED WITH EVERY BUSINESS ALTERNATIVES) BIGGEST VALUE: OPPORTUNITY LOSS Business Alternative Economic growth rate Good (0,4) Bad (0,6) Shrimp ponds 50.000 50.000 Food stalls 80.000 0 Music studio 0 10.000

EOL CALCULATION EOL (Shrimp ponds) = 50.000(0,4) + 50.000(0,6) = 50.000 EOL (food stalls) = 80.000(0,4) + 0(0,6) = 32.000 EOL (music studio) = 0(0,4) + 10.000(0,6) = 6.000 *** The chosen business with the smallest opportunity loss is Music Studio with EOL min = 6.000

CHOOSE THE BEST BUSINESS ALTERNATIVES WITH EOL? Business alternatives Apples beverages Apple Jenang Economic conditions quiet Normal crowd (0,10) (0,7) (0,2) 25.000 400.000 650.000 10.000 440.000 740.000 Apple chips 125.000 400.000 750.000

PAY OFF TABLE Business alternatives quiet (0,10) Economic conditions normal (0,70) crowd (0,2) Apples beverages Apple Jenang 100.000 40.000 100.000 115.000 0 10.000 Apple chips 0 40.000 0

EOL (AB) =100.000(0,1)+40.000(0,7)+100.000(0,2) = 58.000 EOL (AJ) =115.000(0,1)+0+10.000(0,2) = 13.500** (CHOOSEN) EOL (AC) = 0 (O,1)+40.000(0,7)+0 (0,2) = 28.000

EVPI METHOD (EXPECTED VALUE PERFECT INFORMATION) It is a difference between the perfect information and the minimum risks (EOL) As the maximum amount paid for obtaining the perfect information (equal to the minimum EOL) EVPI = EV (Perfect) - EV (min risk) The decision determines the EV (Perfect) depending on the type of actor: RISK TAKER (max) and RISK AVOIDER (min)

EXAMPLE OF EVPI Business alt Economic growth Good (0,4) Bad (0,6) Shrimp ponds 50.000 10.000 Food stalls 20.000 60.000 Music Studio** 100.000 50.000 Based on choosen business alternative (music studio), the EVPI = EV(perfect) biggest value from the first table EV(PERFECT) = 100.000(0,4) + 60.000(0,6) = 40.000 + 36.000 = 76.000 EV(min) choosed based on EOL min (in this case = music studio) EV (min) = 100.000(0,4) + 50.000(0,6) = 40.000 + 30.000 = 70.000 EVPI = EV(S) EV(min) = EOL min = 76.000 70.000 = 6.000

Determine the value of EVPI based on business alternatives (apple beverage, apple jenang and apple chips) selected...????? Condition business quiet Normal crowd (0,10) (0,7) (0,2) Apple beverages 25.000 400.000 650.000 Apple jenang 10.000 440.000 740.000 Apple chips 125.000 400.000 750.000

EVPI EV (perfect) =125.000(0,1)+440.000(0,7)+750.000(0,2) = 12.500+308.000+150.000 =470.500 EV (choosen based on EOL min) = 10.000(0,1)+440.000(0,7)+740.000(0,2) = 457.000 EVPI = EV (perfect) EV(min) = 470.500 457.000 = 13.500 = EOL min

UNCERTAINTY THEORY The probability of a result is not known for certain (only by estimate) Decision-makers do not have complete information The thing to be decided has never happened Anticipate conditions of uncertainty: 1. looking for more information 2. through research 3. the use of subjective probabilities

DECISION-MAKING METHOD OF UNCERTAINTY CONDITIONS There are 5 criterias: 1. Laplace (Bayesian) 2. Maximin Wald 3. Maximax 4. Hurwics 5. Minimax Savage/ Regret

LAPLACE (BAYESIAN) The approach gives the SAME value for each event/condition Similar with EQUAL LIKELIHOOD criteria Assumptions: the decision maker determines the same probability of each occurrence/condition Selected result: HIGHEST weight

LAPLACE Business alt Economic growth Good (0,5) Bad (0,5) Result Shrimp ponds 50.000 10.000 50.000(0,5)+10.000(0.5) = 30.000 Food stalls 20.000 60.000 20.000(0,5)+60.000(0,5) = 40.000 Music Studio** 100.000 50.000 100.000(0.5)+50.000(0.5) = 75.000 ***

MAXIMIN WALD A pessimistic view (RISK AVOIDER) that avoids the risk of future results The hope is the CREDIT VALUE for the alternative chosen actions How to: compare MINIMUM and MAXIMUM Payoffs to get the most MINIMUM value selected

MAXIMIN WALD Business alt Economic growth result good bad Min Max Shrimp ponds 50.000 10.000 10.000 Food stalls 20.000 60.000 20.000 Music Studio** 100.000 50.000 50.000***

MAXIMAX Contrary to Maximin's criteria Optimistic view (RISK TAKER), aggressive attitude with the greatest results to be achieved MAXIMIN and MAXIMAX Criteria is unrealistic for the real business world because of the PARSIAL assessment

MAXIMAX Business alt Economic growth Result good Bad Max Max Shrimp ponds 50.000 10.000 50.000 Food stalls 20.000 60.000 60.000 Music Studio** 100.000 50.000 100.000 ***

HURWICS Criteria result of Maximin and Maximax compromise Rarely as Risk Taker and Avoider are perfect The coefficient of Optimism (α) and pessimism (1-α) Pay off weighted = α (pay off maximum) + (1- α) (pay off minimum) Best alternative = BIGGEST value

HURWICS Economic growth Business alt Maximax Maximin Result (0,6) (0,4) Shrimp ponds 50.000 10.000 Food stalls 60.000 20.000 Music Studio** 100.000 50.000 50.000(0,6)+10.000(0,4) = 30.000+4.000 = 34.000 60.000(0,6)+20.000(0,4) = 36.000+8.000=44.000 100.000(0,6)+50.000(0,4) =60.000+20.000=80.000*

MINIMAX REGRET Based on Opportunity Loss Incidental Current/UNFORTUNATE EVENT CRITERION (comparing between income with specific action and highest expected income)

MINIMAX REGRET Business alt Economic growth Opp.Loss (between each business alt) good bad good Bad Result (max -> min) Shrimp ponds 50.000 10.000 50.000 50.000 50.000 Food stalls 20.000 60.000 80.000 0 80.000 Music Studio** 100.000 50.000 0 10.000 10.000*

THANK YOU