Fiscal Reaction Functions of Different Euro Area Countries

Similar documents
DETERMINANTS OF GROWTH

Panel A: Treated firm matched to one control firm. t + 1 t + 2 t + 3 Total CFO Compensation 5.03% 0.84% 10.27% [0.384] [0.892] [0.

Internet Appendix. For. Birds of a feather: Value implications of political alignment between top management and directors

The Financing and Growth of Firms in China and India: Evidence from Capital Markets

Credit Supply and Monetary Policy: Identifying the Bank Balance-Sheet Channel with Loan Applications. Web Appendix

Gasoline Empirical Analysis: Competition Bureau March 2005

Financing Decisions of REITs and the Switching Effect

DERIVED DEMAND FOR FRESH CHEESE PRODUCTS IMPORTED INTO JAPAN

Demographic Change, Price Subsidy and the Rising Oil Demand in OPEC

The Contribution made by Beer to the European Economy. Czech Republic - January 2016

THE IRISH WINE MARKET 2017

Table A.1: Use of funds by frequency of ROSCA meetings in 9 research sites (Note multiple answers are allowed per respondent)

STATE OF THE VITIVINICULTURE WORLD MARKET

The Effects of Presidential Politics on CEO Compensation

Appendix A. Table A1: Marginal effects and elasticities on the export probability

Structural Reforms and Agricultural Export Performance An Empirical Analysis

2016 World wine production estimated at 259 mhl, a fall of 5% compared with 2015

J / A V 9 / N O.

THE IRISH BEER MARKET 2017

System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks 2009

Value of production of agricultural products and foodstuffs, wines, aromatised wines and spirits protected by a geographical indication (GI)

The Roles of Social Media and Expert Reviews in the Market for High-End Goods: An Example Using Bordeaux and California Wines

What does radical price change and choice reveal?

Effects of Election Results on Stock Price Performance: Evidence from 1976 to 2008

Internet Appendix for CEO Personal Risk-taking and Corporate Policies TABLE IA.1 Pilot CEOs and Firm Risk (Controlling for High Performance Pay)


Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Jg., Heft 5, 2015, Online- Anhang

The premium for organic wines

World Cocoa and CBE markets. Presentation to Global Shea 2014 By Owen Wagner, LMC International, Raleigh, NC

The Bank Lending Channel of Conventional and Unconventional Monetary Policy: A Euro-area bank-level Analysis

"Primary agricultural commodity trade and labour market outcome

Country of Origin Advertising and U.S. Wine Imports

Volume 30, Issue 1. Gender and firm-size: Evidence from Africa

Beverage Exports

and the World Market for Wine The Central Valley is a Central Part of the Competitive World of Wine What is happening in the world of wine?

The Contribution made by Beer to the European Economy. Poland - January 2016

MARKET NEWSLETTER No 93 April 2015

LETTER FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COFFEE MARKET REPORT. November 2004

STATE OF THE VITIVINICULTURE WORLD MARKET

GLOBAL ECONOMIC VITIVINICULTURE DATA

Preview. Introduction (cont.) Introduction. Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost (cont.) Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost

Preview. Introduction. Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

North Carolina Exports by Quarter (in constant 2Q 2013 dollars)

World vitiviniculture situation

2016 China Dry Bean Historical production And Estimated planting intentions Analysis

Required Report - public distribution Date: 1/14/2008 GAIN Report Number: GR7020

Red wine consumption in the new world and the old world

Chile. Tree Nuts Annual. Almonds and Walnuts Annual Report

European and Global Markets for Flexible Packaging. John Durston, FPE Vice-Chairman. with kind support of Paul Gaster, PCI FILMS (

Napa Highway 29 Open Wineries

Gender and Firm-size: Evidence from Africa

Forecast Report

Food and beverage services statistics - NACE Rev. 2

The Inclusiveness of Africa s Recent High- Growth Episode: Evidence from Six Countries

Trade Facilitation and Supply Chain Security:

Wine Economics Research Centre Wine Policy Brief No. 6

Wage-led growth in Europe

Online Appendix for. To Buy or Not to Buy: Consumer Constraints in the Housing Market

The Contribution made by Beer to the European Economy

Angela Mariani. University of Naples Parthenope

Fair Trade and Free Entry: Can a Disequilibrium Market Serve as a Development Tool? Online Appendix September 2014

W or ld Cocoa and CBE mar kets. Presentation to Global Shea 2013 By Richard Truscott, LMC International, Oxford, UK

SUPPLEMENTARY SUBMISSION FROM THE SCOTTISH BEER AND PUB ASSOCIATION

MBA 503 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

Effect of new markets on the supply-demand balance

World sugar market. Platts/Kingsman EU conference Geneva 14th of April Benoît Boisleux

Reduce food waste at home:

1/17/manufacturing-jobs-used-to-pay-really-well-notanymore-e/

Poland. Poland leads EU in processed strawberries

Housing Quality in Europe A Comparative Analysis Based on EU-SILC Data

Debt and Debt Management among Older Adults

2016 Year End Budget to Actual Review (Preliminary and Unaudited) March 23, 2017 Mike Colsch

Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

TOPIC 12. Motivation for Trade. Tuesday, March 27, 12

Mexico Milk Cow Numbers and Milk Production per Cow,

Effects of political-economic integration and trade liberalization on exports of Italian Quality Wines Produced in Determined Regions (QWPDR)

An overview of the European flour milling industry. Gary SHARKEY, European Flour Millers Vice-President

The Sources of Risk Spillovers among REITs: Asset Similarities and Regional Proximity

The state of the European GI wines sector: a comparative analysis of performance

Turkey Citrus Annual 2002

Wine and spirits market in Japan: Barriers and opportunities. Jean-Etienne Gourgues Pernod Ricard Japan President & CEO

Name of trading venue: ICE FUTURES EUROPE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS DIVISION

The Future of the Ice Cream Market in Finland to 2018

Promotion Strategy and Financial Policy -The Wine Industry in Hokkaido Japan -

Greece. Fresh Deciduous Fruit Annual 2012

Global Takeaway Food Delivery Market: Trends & Opportunities (2015 Edition) January 2016

CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR FOOD MANUFACTURERS

Import elasticity of tea: a case of Pakistan

Fairbanks North Star Borough Mayor s Office

The evolving future of the sugar industry. José Orive, Executive Director International Sugar Organization

Citrus: World Markets and Trade

ORGANIC PRODUCTS CLUSTER (OPC)

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model. Pearson Education Limited All rights reserved.

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF WINE AND VINEYARDS IN NAPA COUNTY

Liquidity and Risk Premia in Electricity Futures Markets

Comparative Analysis of Fresh and Dried Fish Consumption in Ondo State, Nigeria

INDIA S SUGAR MARKET DYNAMICS:

SOUTH AFRICA: ESTIMATES OF SUPPORT TO AGRICULTURE DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

The supply and demand for oilseeds in South Africa

Transcription:

Fiscal Reaction Functions of Different Euro Area Countries Klaus Weyerstrass 56th SIE Annual Conference, Naples, 22-24 October 2015

Introduction sustainability of public finances Fiscal reaction functions Fiscal rules Estimation of fiscal reaction functions for 7 Euro area countries

Sustainability of public finances Public finances are sustainable if a government is able to pay back its debt in the future Government budget constraint G t + 1 + i t B t 1 = T t + B t G: Public consumption T: Taxes B: One-period government bonds i: Interest rate

Sustainability of public finances Following Balassone &Franco (2000) and Neck & Sturm (2008): d t + 1 + i t 1 + gy t b t 1 = b t b: Government debt in relation to GDP d: Primary balance (gov. cons. taxes) in relation to GDP gy: Growth rate of nominal GDP Debt ratio increases if the government runs a deficit and nominal interest rate > nominal GDP growth.

Sustainability of public finances Following Balassone &Franco (2000) and Neck & Sturm (2008): b t+1 b t+1 b t = r gr b t + d t+1 Debt ratio decreases ( b t ) < 0, if primary budget surplus > debt servicing d t+1 r gr b t

Sustainability of public finances Following Balassone &Franco (2000) and Neck & Sturm (2008): b t+1 b t+1 b t = r gr b t + d t+1 Debt ratio decreases ( b t ) < 0, if primary budget surplus > debt servicing d t+1 r gr b t Public finances are sustainable if increasing debt level improving primary budget balance

Fiscal reaction functions Bohn (1998): reaction of the primary budget balance to changes in public debt is an indicator of sustainability of fiscal policies Public debt rises in t primary balance should improve in t+1

Fiscal reaction functions Some empirical literature Wyplosz (2006) and Staehr (2008): some evidence of positive feedback from debt to primary balance in European countries, but difficult to estimate precisely because of short time series Piergallini and Postigliola (2012): primary balance in Italy reacts positively to the debt level De Mello (2008): strong positive reaction of primary balance to lagged debt in Brazil

Fiscal rules Fiscal rules may reinforce reaction of primary balance to past debt development European Commission, DG ECFIN, has compiled a dataset on fiscal rules in the 28 EU countries Time period 1990 2013 All types of numerical fiscal rules: budget balance, debt, expenditure, and revenue rules All levels of government: central, regional, and local, general government, and social security

Estimation of fiscal reaction functions 7 Euro area countries: Austria, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Spain Explanatory variable: lagged public debt Two sets of estimations: a) Panel estimations for all seven Euro area countries. Dependent variables: (a) primary budget balance, (b) headline balance, (c) total public revenues, (d) total expenditures, (e) direct taxes, (f) indirect taxes, (g) public consumption, (h) public investment, (i) subsidies, (j) transfers b) Separate estimations for each country. Dependent variable: primary budget balance With and without fiscal rules Controlling for business cycle influence (GDP level or growth)

Results panel estimations PRIMARY PRIMARY HEADLINE BALANCE (a) BALANCE (b) BALANCE (a) HEADLINE BALANCE (b) -2.816 * -2.871 * CONSTANT (1.186) (1.263) 0.016 0.017 DEBT -1 (0.013) (0.014) 0.003 DEBT -1 RULE -1 (0.004) -6.188 *** (1.322) 0.003 (0.015) -3.757 ** (1.544) -0.031 (0.019) 0.013 *** (0.005) REAL GDP GROWTH 0.805 *** (0.095) 0.819 *** (0.101) NOMINAL GDP GROWTH 0.480 *** 0.509 *** (7.334) (0.066) ADJUSTED R² 0.323 0.315 0.360 0.405 NO. OF OBSERVATIONS 149 142 149 142 Fixed country effects; standard errors in parentheses; *, **, *** : significant at 10, 5, 1 percent

Results panel estimations TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL EX- TOTAL EX- REVENUES (a) REVENUES (b) PENDITUES (a) PENDITURES (b) CONSTANT 38.789 *** (0.724) 38.996 *** (0.824) 41.010 *** (1.261) 40.231 *** (1.381) 0.041 *** 0.038 *** 0.070 *** 0.079 *** DEBT -1 (0.008) (0.001) (0.016) (0.017) 0.001-0.007 DEBT -1 RULE -1 (0.002) (0.005) NOMINAL GDP GROWTH 0.058 0.062 (0.033) (0.035) ADJUSTED R² 0.879 0.878 0.581 0.583 NO. OF OBSERVATIONS 146 139 149 149 Fixed country effects; standard errors in parentheses; *, **, *** : significant at 10, 5, 1 percent

Estimation of fiscal reaction functions DIRECT DIRECT INDIRECT TAXES INDIRECT TAXES (a) TAXES (b) (a) TAXES (b) CONSTANT 10.308 *** (0.286) 10.595 *** (0.833) 12.239 *** (0.325) 12.454 *** (0.338) DEBT -1 0.013 *** (0.003) 0.008 ** (0.004) 0.003 (0.003) 0.0005 (0.039) DEBT -1 RULE -1 0.002 * (0.001) 0.002 ** (0.001) NOMINAL GDP GROWTH 0.026 * (0.014) 0.030 ** (0.015) 0.046 *** (0.016) 0.049 *** (0.016) ADJUSTED R² 0.884 0.885 0.756 0.762 NO. OF OBSERVATIONS 143 136 143 143 Fixed country effects; standard errors in parentheses; *, **, *** : significant at 10, 5, 1 percent

Results panel estimations PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC PUBLIC CONS. (a) CONS. (b) INVEST. (a) INVEST.(b) 19.681 *** 19.624 *** CONSTANT (0.388) (0.446) -0.007-0.006 DEBT -1 (0.004) (0.005) 0.001 DEBT -1 RULE -1 (0.001) 5.361 *** (0.325) -0.027 *** (0.002) 5.381 *** (0.179) -0.027 *** (0.002) -0.0007 (0.0006) REAL GDP GROWTH -1-0.262 *** (0.030) -0.251 *** (0.032) ADJUSTED R² 0.594 0.590 0.757 0.779 NO. OF OBSERVATIONS 149 142 149 142 Fixed country effects; standard errors in parentheses; *, **, *** : significant at 10, 5, 1 percent

Results panel estimations SUBSIDIES (a) SUBSIDIES (b) TRANSFERS (a) TRANSFERS (b) CONSTANT 1.325 *** (0.108) 1.216 *** (0.446) 16.662 *** (0.410) 16.656 *** (0.497) DEBT -1-0.002 (0.002) -0.0003 (0.002) 0.057 *** (0.005) 0.057 *** (0.006) DEBT -1 RULE -1-0.001 *** REAL GDP GROWTH (0.0004) -0.451 *** (0.033) -0.001 (0.002) -0.457 *** (0.035) ADJUSTED R² 0.695 0.728 0.940 0.941 NO. OF OBSERVATIONS 149 142 149 142 Fixed country effects; standard errors in parentheses; *, **, *** : significant at 10, 5, 1 percent

Estimation of fiscal reaction functions Summary of panel estimation results: Budget balance improves only insignificantly as a reaction to a past increase of public debt Both total revenues and expenditures rise Revenues: primarily direct taxes are used to improve public finances Expenditures: public investment and subsidies are reduced to improve the budget balance Presence of fiscal rules slightly improves the reaction of public finances to past debt increase

Results individual countries (primary balance) CONSTANT AUSTRIA (a) AUSTRIA (b) GERMANY (a) GERMANY (b) 4.739 * (2.688) DEBT -1-0.098 (0.002) 8.151 * (4.031) -0.115 (0.064) DEBT -1 RULE -1 0.015 NOMINAL GDP GROWTH NOMINAL GDP LEVEL DUMMIES 0.00001 (0.000009) 1995, 2004, 2009 (0.012) 0.000002 (0.00001) 1995, 2004,02009-2.673 (2.013) 0.050 (0.030) 0.149 (0.121) -2.314 (2.462) Standard errors in brackets; *, **, *** : significant at 10, 5, 1 percent 0.043 (0.040) 0.002 (0.008) 0.149 (0.121) 1995 1995 ADJUSTED R² 0.360 0.383 0.481 0.454 NO. OF OBSERVATIONS 23 22 23 22

Results individual countries (primary balance) ITALY (a) ITALY (b) SPAIN (a) SPAIN (b) CONSTANT -5.262 * (4.004) -5.176 * (4.313) -7.270 *** (1.666) -7.119 *** (1.597) DEBT -1 0.068 * (0.037) 0.062 (0.041) 0.033 (0.030) 0.015 (0.027) DEBT -1 RULE -1-0.015 ** (0.007) 0.008 (0.005) REAL GDP GROWTH 0.431 ** (0.158) 0.453 ** (0.147) NOMINAL GDP GROWTH 1.007 *** (0.092) 1.093 *** (0.104) ADJUSTED R² 0.293 0.453 0.864 0.876 NO. OF OBSERVATIONS 23 22 20 20 Standard errors in brackets; *, **, *** : significant at 10, 5, 1 percent

Results individual countries (primary balance) PORTUGAL (a) PORTUGAL (b) IRELAND (a) IRELAND (b) CONSTANT -7.434 *** (1.606) -9.487 *** (2.072) -2.856 * (1.447) -2.103 (1.528) DEBT -1 0.059 *** (0.017) 0.083 ** (0.023) -0.016 (0.019) -0.031 (0.022) DEBT -1 RULE -1-0.010 (0.007) 0.011 (0.008) NOMINAL GDP GROWTH 0.050 *** (0.119) 0.546 *** (0.118) 0.576 *** (0.084) 0.661 *** (0.087) DUMMIES 2010 2010 2010 2010 ADJUSTED R² 0.685 0.708 0.897 0.905 NO. OF OBSERVATIONS 20 20 20 19 Standard errors in brackets; *, **, *** : significant at 10, 5, 1 percent

Results individual countries (primary balance) GREECE (a) GREECE (b) CONSTANT -1.043 (6.135) 23.079 ** (11.142) DEBT -1-0.009 (0.049) -0.205 ** (0.088) DEBT -1 RULE -1 0.042 ** (0.020) NOMINAL GDP GROWTH 0.368 (0.250) 0.207 (0.234) ADJUSTED R² 0.685 0.447 NO. OF OBSERVATIONS 20 19 Standard errors in brackets; *, **, *** : significant at 10, 5, 1 percent

Individual countries summary Austria: improvement of primary balance when taking fiscal rule into account, but insignificant Germany: improvement of primary balance with and without fiscal rule, but insignificant Spain: improvement of primary balance with and without fiscal rule, but insignificant Italy: significant improvement of primary balance without fiscal rule, significant deterioration with fiscal rule

Individual countries summary Portugal: significant improvement of primary balance without fiscal rule, insignificant deterioration with fiscal rule Ireland: insignificant deterioration of primary balance without fiscal rule, insignificant improvement with fiscal rule Greece: significant deterioration of primary balance without fiscal rules, significant improvement with fiscal rule

Thank you for your attention klaus.weyerstrass@ihs.ac.at