Slowing The Spread of Invasive Alien Species: Biosecurity Best Practice and Stakeholder Engagement Cat Shannon, Claire Quinn, Paul Stebbing 3 & Alison M. Dunn School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS6 9JT, UK Sustainability Research Institute, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS6 9JT, UK 3 Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Barrack Road, Weymouth, DT4 8UB, UK University of Leeds, UK C.F.Shannon@leeds.ac.uk
Biosecurity Accidental introduction and/or spread of IAS can result from a range of activities including agriculture, transport, trade and recreation. Biosecurity is key to preventing the introduction and spread of IAS. Biosecurity is about reducing the risk of introducing or spreading IAS (and other harmful organisms such as diseases) in the wild.
Better Biosecurity Campaigns helping to raise awareness of the issues in the freshwater environment: Be Plant Wise and Check Clean Dry. Codes of practice and other information to help businesses and those importing goods and animals: Horticultural Code of Practice, Importing Goods and Products, Importation of Animals. Free biosecurity e-learning 3
Knowledge, risk and behaviour Risk perceptions are particularly important because they are influenced by attitudes, beliefs and knowledge, and can help predict behavioural intentions Researchers represent an important group of stakeholders who undertake activities in the field that could potentially facilitate the spread of IAS. We need to understand some of the drivers of better biosecurity behaviour in the field to inform policy/campaigns etc. 4
Case study The aim of this study was to investigate researchers perceptions of risk in relation to their field activities and whether risk perceptions influenced behaviour. We gathered quantitative data on perceptions of risk and biosecurity practices using an online questionnaire. 5
Case study Demographic data Fieldwork activities Actual biosecurity practices Awareness and perceptions of risk Perceived biosecurity 6
Number of respondents 8 6 4 8 6 4 3 9 3 9 8 4 3 5 6 Role(s) at institution 7
N umber of respondents 3 5 6 5 5 7 5 7 4 4 8 5 8 8 3 5 3 5 9 3 3 Disciplinary area(s) 8
9
Percentage of respondents Mean Cleaning Score Impact of academic discipline (knowledge) on risk perception and biosecurity practice 6 5 4 43.3 33.3.8.6.4..5.4 3 6.6.9.8.6.4. Risk Perception Ecology/Conservation Other Perceived Biosecurity Actual Biosecurity Ecology/Conservation Other
Percentage of respondents Mean Cleaning Score Impact of campaigns and guidance on risk perception and biosecurity practice 6 5 53.84 ** 46. **.8.77 **.6 4.4..34 3 3. 5.4.8.6.4. Risk Perception Familiarity with Campaigns Perceived Biosecurity Not Familiar Actual Biosecurity Familiarity with Campaigns Not Familiar
Percentage of Respondents Mean Biosecurity Score Impact of field experience (aquatic environments) on risk perception and biosecurity practice 6 5 54.5 **.8.6.54.5 4 36.4.4. 3 5.6 3.3.8.6.4. Risk Perception Activity (aquatic) Perceived Biosecurity Other Actual Biosecurity Activity (aquatic) Other
Summary Knowledge does not always lead to behaviour change!! Awareness of biosecurity campaigns increase perception of risk, perceived and actual biosecurity behaviour Lack of understanding about what constitutes good biosecurity practice. Improve targeted awareness raising campaigns Create directed training on biosecurity practices https://goo.gl/uxuzzc 3
Next steps Embed biosecurity training Trained researchers in : government, NGOs, charities, education, conservation, industry, research ENVIRONMENT: reduction in the spread and impact of Invasive Alien Species. Reduction in the cost of mitigation Cat Shannon University of Leeds, UK C.F.Shannon@leeds.ac.uk @catshannon9 4