Project Summary. Principal Investigator: C. R. Kerth Texas A&M University

Similar documents
Project Summary. Identifying consumer preferences for specific beef flavor characteristics

Factors influencing mandarin fruit quality. What drives the eating. Outline. experience in mandarins?

odor molecule odor quality activates % of found in % of fruits inhibits % of ORs ORs

Thanks to our Sponsor

Analysis of Dairy Products, Using SIFT-MS

Somchai Rice 1, Jacek A. Koziel 1, Jennie Savits 2,3, Murlidhar Dharmadhikari 2,3 1 Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University

Sensory evaluation of virgin or cold-pressed edible oils

Relationships Between Descriptive Beef Flavor Attributes and Consumer Liking

UNDERSTANDING FAULTS IN WINE BY JAMIE GOODE

by trained human panelist. Details for each signal are given in Table 2.

INFLUENCE OF VARIOUS SEASONINGS ON BEEF FLAVOR: US, SPANISH, AND ARGENTINEAN CUSTOMS

Sensory Training Kits

CHAPTER 8. Sample Laboratory Experiments

Project Summary. Extending Shelf-Life of Beef Cuts Utilizing Low Level Carbon Monoxide in Modified Atmosphere Packaging Systems

Effects of Capture and Return on Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera L.) Fermentation Volatiles. Emily Hodson

Identifying Wine Sensory Attributes. Dr. Renee Threlfall Research Scientist University of Arkansas

Overview of Distilled Spirits Flavor Production and Evaluation of Their Characteristics with Selected Aroma Bottle Samples

What is behind cereal flavour: Case studies on linking sensory and instrumental data Raija Liisa Heiniö, VTT Biotechnology, Finland

Sensory Quality Measurements

SUPELCO. Analysis of Flavors and Off-Flavors in Foods and Beverages Using SPME. Robert E. Shirey and Leonard M. Sidisky

Somchai Rice 1, Jacek A. Koziel 1, Anne Fennell 2 1

Characteristics of California Almonds. December 8, 2015

Browning reactions. Guided Inquiry Activity #17

Life Science and Chemical Analysis Solutions. Key Words: GCxGC-TOFMS, SPME, Food and Flavors. LECO Corporation; Saint Joseph, Michigan USA

The Importance of Dose Rate and Contact Time in the Use of Oak Alternatives

Table 1: Experimental conditions for the instrument acquisition method

Roasted. Peanut. Flavor. Shangci Wang and Koushik Adhikari Department of Food Science and Technology University of Georgia Griffin campus

Varietal Specific Barrel Profiles

Sensory Quality Measurements

Flavor of Roasted Peanuts

Smoke Taint: Analysis and Remediation Strategies Jasha Karasek

Lamb and Mutton Quality Audit

Difference in Aroma Compounds and Quality Variation in Milled Rice from 1996 to 2001

Carolyn Ross. WSU School of Food Science

Emerging Applications

Standardising the Aroma Bouquet of Australian Black Truffles (T. Melanosporum)

Meat flavour - What does the Consumer Like? Linda Farmer Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX

The first checkoff-funded National Beef Tenderness

Determination of key volatiles in Australian Black Truffles aroma by combined GCMS and organoleptic techniques

UNDERSTANDING WINE Class 1 Worksheet

VQA Ontario. Quality Assurance Processes - Tasting

GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF SOME VOLATILE CONGENERS IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF STRONG ALCOHOLIC FRUIT SPIRITS

(Bio)technical tools to tailor cereal flavour

ADVANCED ANALYTICAL SENSORY CORRELATION TOWARDS A BETTER MOLECULAR UNDERSTANDING OF COFFEE FLAVOUR

Flavor and Aroma Biology

Pitahaya postharvest management and sensory evaluation

CITRUS & ALLIED GLOSSARY OF INDUSTRY TERMS

Prediction of juice quality from fruit analysis

5. Supporting documents to be provided by the applicant IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER

EFFECT OF TOMATO GENETIC VARIATION ON LYE PEELING EFFICACY TOMATO SOLUTIONS JIM AND ADAM DICK SUMMARY

Volatile Profiling in Wine Using Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry with Thermal Desorption

SENSORY AND ANALYTICAL: WHERE SCIENCE MEETS ART. Room 314 December

Timing of Treatment O 2 Dosage Typical Duration During Fermentation mg/l Total Daily. Between AF - MLF 1 3 mg/l/day 4 10 Days

Anaerobic Cell Respiration by Yeast

Flavour release and perception in reformulated foods

Introduction. Methods

Little Things That Make A Big Difference: Yeast Selection. Yeast selection tasting

Wine Aging and Monitoring Workshop On-Line References

F&N 453 Project Written Report. TITLE: Effect of wheat germ substituted for 10%, 20%, and 30% of all purpose flour by

Characterization of the Volatile Substances and Aroma Components from Traditional Soypaste

Sensory and Flavor Training for Brewers

Tomato Quality Attributes

Off-flavor Components of Green Tea during Preservation

Investigating the factors influencing hop aroma in beer

Fermentation-derived aroma compounds and grape-derived monoterpenes

BENEFITS OF FLAVOR ENCAPSULATION

yeast-derived flavours

Introduction to Wine Judging A preparatory course for AWS Certified Wine Judge Training

VOLANTE GROUP. A fresh way to look at the past by building on the future.

COFFEE BASICS SCAA. The Elements of Proper Brewing and Creating an Ideal Coffee Drinking Experience

Consumer Education VCO Processing Methods (Dry & Wet Methods)

Extra Virgin Olive Oils A Case Study

Flavor and Aroma Biology

Characterisation of New Zealand hop character and the impact of yeast strain on hop derived compounds in beer

CHARACTERIZATION OF BEEF AT RETAIL: OKLAHOMA MARKET STUDY. C. L. NickI, H. G. Dolezal2, F. K. Ray3 and L. W. Hand4. Story in Brief

The impact of smoke exposure on different grape varieties. Renata Ristic and Kerry Wilkinson

Increasing Toast Character in French Oak Profiles

BeefCuts. Primal & Subprimal Weights and Yields 1300-pound Steer Choice, YG3 Dressing Percentage: 62% Chuck Rib Loin. Round. Brisket. Plate.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR CO-INOCULATION

World of Wine: From Grape to Glass

Product No. Product Name CAS FEMA Specification Packing. BBTY2001 2,3,5 Trimethyl Pyrazine, Natural % n.

BEEF Effect of processing conditions on nutrient disappearance of cold-pressed and hexane-extracted camelina and carinata meals in vitro 1

Experiment 6 Thin-Layer Chromatography (TLC)

FIELD PEAS IN LIVESTOCK DIETS. Karla Jenkins Cow/calf range management specialist, Panhandle Research and Extension Center

SPONGE CAKE APPLICATION RESEARCH COMPARING THE FUNCTIONALITY OF EGGS TO EGG REPLACERS IN SPONGE CAKE FORMULATIONS RESEARCH SUMMARY

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: W10104

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

Laboratory Research Proposal Streusel Coffee Cake with Pureed Cannellini Beans

AN ENOLOGY EXTENSION SERVICE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION

Smoke Taint Update. Thomas Collins, PhD Washington State University

Aroma Chemicals for Savory Flavors

Understanding the impact hopping rate has on the aroma quality and intensity of beer dry hopped with Cascade

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

FOOD FOR THOUGHT Topical Insights from our Subject Matter Experts LEVERAGING AGITATING RETORT PROCESSING TO OPTIMIZE PRODUCT QUALITY

Volatiles: Impacts of Fruit Development, Ethylene, and Storage Environment. Jim Mattheis Tree Fruit Research Laboratory Wenatchee, WA, USA

The malting process Kilned vs. roasted Specialty grains and steeping Malt extract production

Comparison of three methods of packaging for the ageing/maturation of beef

Labelled with names of substances, poster coloured, laminated and lightresistant (without 2-Ethylhexanol, Toluene, 1,3-Dimethyl naphthalene)

2017 Summary of changes to rules for World Brewers Cup

Technical note. How much do potential precursor compounds contribute to reductive aromas in wines post-bottling?

Transcription:

Project Summary Determination of aromatic production from surface browning to improve flavor in steaks using differences in steak thickness and cook surface temperature Principal Investigator: C. R. Kerth Texas A&M University Study Completed May 2013

Determination of aromatic production from surface browning to improve flavor in steaks using differences in steak thickness and cook surface temperature: Project Summary Background Beef flavor is an incredibly complex and completely understood quality trait. While Calkins and Hodgen (2007) and Mottram (1998) have done an admirable job of reviewing current literature and describing many of the factors involved in determining beef flavor, much still needs to be done. Basic flavor components are generally classified into two categories: lipid-derived and Maillard reaction products (MRP). During cooking the lipids are degraded giving various derivative compounds that are aromatic, but have much higher aroma thresholds (higher concentrations are required to detect an aroma) compared to MRP. On the other hand, MRP are a result of the combination of heat, sugar, and amino acids. The meat supplies the sugar (primarily ribose) and amino acids from the high protein content, so when meat is heated to over 300 F at the surface, the result is browning and the production of hundreds of aromatic compounds with very low aroma thresholds (parts per quadrillion in some cases). Specific objectives were 1) to determine the primary groupings of chemical aromatics that generate positive beef flavor ID s using trained panel and GC/MS data generated from the Beef Flavor Lexicon experiment (R.K. Miller and C.R. Kerth, NCBA, 2011) 2) to determine the ability to generate and document positive aromatic chemical compounds generated by steaks cut 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 inches thick cooked to a medium degree of doneness at a low (350 F), medium (400 F), or high (450 F) grill surface temperature. Methodology Steaks. Select strip loins were ordered from a commercial distributor from a major packing plant. The strip loins were placed in the freezer after aging to allow uniform and precise cutting thickness of the steaks on the band saw. After intact strip loins were frozen, loins were divided into 9 portions (3 cooking temps x 3 steak thicknesses). Steaks for all cooked analyses were placed on the grill, turned when the internal temperature reaches 35 o C (95 o F) and removed when the internal temperature reaches 71 o C (160 o F, medium degree of doneness). 350 o F 400 o F 450 o F 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 6 steaks 6 steaks 6 steaks 6 steaks 6 steaks 6 steaks 6 steaks 6 steaks 6 steaks (1 strip loin cut into 9 steaks representing all 3 thicknesses = 9 inches, sufficient to square rib end and avoid vein steaks) GC/MS and Sniff-port. Steaks were cooked, all external fat were removed, and the steaks were cut into pieces as would be done for sensory (0.5 in x 0.5 in cubes) and placed in a 1 pint glass jar with a Teflon lid and placed in a water bath held at 60 o C (140 o F). After equilibrating for 20 minutes, a solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) fiber was inserted through the lid and into the headspace above the steak to collect volatile chemicals.

Findings To determine the impact of steak thickness and cooking surface temperature, the volatile compounds that are associated with published aroma descriptors are reported in Table 1. The highest cook surface temperature (450 F) produced higher amounts of 1-Hexanol (cut grass), 2- ethyl-5-methyl-pyraine (roasted), 2,5-dimethyl-pyrazine (roasted), phenyl-acetaldehyde (rosy), and trimethyl-pyrazine (roasted), but lower total amounts of 2,3-butanedione (buttery), and toluene (paint thinner) compared to the lower cook surface temperature. The thinnest steaks (0.5 inch) dominated those volatiles primarily originating from lipid degradation from the shorter cooking times. These included those that have a tallow, woody, soapy, fruity, greenbean, smokey, fruity, oily, green, fatty, and sweet aromas from E-2-decenal, 1-hexanol, 1-octanol, 2- heptanone, 2-pentyl-furan, decanal, ethyl-benzene, heptanal, nonanal, octanal, styrene, respectively. On the other hand, the 3.81-cm-thick steaks dominated the production of Maillard products with roasted, roasted, roasted, fruity, burnt, buttery, roasted, meaty/roasted, sickly, and roasted aromas generated by 2-ethyl-3-methyl-pyrazine, 2-ethyl-3,5-dimethyl-pyrazine, 2-ethyl- 5-methyl-pyrazine, 2-ethyl-6-methyl-pyrazine, 2-methyl butanal, butanedione, 2,5-dimethylpyrazine, 3-methyl-butanal, and methyl-pyrazine, respectively. 1-Pentanol and 2-decenal (lipid degradation products) variation both could be explained by steak internal temperature on and off with over 22% and 12% of the variation, respectively. About two-thirds of the variation in 2,4-nonadienal (fried, fat aroma) could be explained by skillet temperature at the beginning and end, steak surface temperature at the flip and at the end, steak internal temperature at the end of cooking, and cook loss percentage. Butanoic (butyric) acid is characterized by a very strong, unpleasant aroma similar to vomit at high concentrations, but has been shown to be important to aroma balance at low concentrations, and five cooking measurements accounted for 17.0% of the variation. Almost 20% of the variation in the smokey aroma decanal can be explained by beginning, flipped, and ending steak surface temperature, total cooking time, and cooking loss percentage. Twenty-four percent of the meaty aroma 2- methyl-furan generated from Maillard reactions is solely from the steak surface temperature at the end of cooking. Beginning steak internal temperature and ending steak internal temperature accounts for 35.8% of the variation in the green, burnt aroma of heptanal. Hexanal (an extraordinarily important volatile compound that indicates the degree of oxidative rancidity/warmed-over-flavor) and pentanal (a green, burnt aroma) are both lipid degradation products and 17.8% and 9.6% of the variation, respectively, can be attributed to the ending internal steak temperature. A total of seven variables entered the equation for nonanal (green) and accounted for almost 29% of the variation. Four temperature variables combined to account for more than 35% of the variation in the fatty aroma from octanal. The three Maillard products 2,3-dimethyl-pyrazine, 2,5-dimethyl-pyrazine, and trimethyl-pyrazine with nutty, roasted aromas could be described by the ending surface temperature, and when combined with other cooking temperature and time measurements accounted for 22.2, 49.5, and 21.4% of the variation, respectively. Additionally, all three of these compounds were positively affected by both time and temperature which would be characteristic of Maillard products.

Implications Steaks can be cut to different thicknesses and cooked with differing cook surface temperatures to differentially create aromatic volatiles that are characteristic of various aroma descriptors. As we find more information about the likes and dislikes of consumers with differing backgrounds (e.g. heavy, moderate, or light beef users) and desires, it appears that it will be possible to give specific cutting and cookery instructions to generate volatile aromatic compounds that match those consumers likes. This will become increasingly important as beef consumers as a whole have more and more differing perceptions and acceptances and the beef industry is able to create a product that is liked by any beef consumer, especially in the lessexpensive commodity grades of USDA Select and Low Choice.

Tables: Table 1. Cooking surface temperature and steak thickness impacts on volatile compounds with published aroma descriptors. Temp Thick P > F P > F Volatiles with published aromas in meat 350F(177C) 400F(204C) 450F(232C) ½ in(1.3cm) 1 in(2.5cm) 1½in(3.8cm) Temp Thickness Descriptor (E)-2-Decenal 679 1997 906 3668 a 219 ab -305 b NS 0.049 Tallow 1-Hexanol 460 b 326 b 3629 a 2461 a 2173 a -219 b 0.035 0.11 Woody, cut grass 1-Octanol 3722 2497 2542 5511 a 1582 b 1668 b NS 0.033 Soapy, waxy 2-ethyl-3-methyl- pyrazine 1407 1689 3614 498 b 2084 ab 4128 a NS 0.086 Roasted 2-ethyl-3,5-dimethyl- pyrazine 687 749 2154 283 b 2268 a 1030 ab NS 0.084 Nutty, roasted 2-ethyl-5-methyl- pyrazine 198 b 2413 b 9465 a 889 b 3635 ab 7554 a 0.010 0.082 Nutty, roasted 2-ethyl-6-methyl- pyrazine 863 2120 5895 400 b 1533 ab 6945 a NS 0.071 Fruity 2-Heptanone 1157 466-20 1638 a 49 ab -85 b NS 0.086 Fruity, spicy 2-methyl butanal 15373 41488 66826 2702 b 25373 ab 95611 a NS 0.021 Burnt, sickly 2-pentyl- furan 5134 3468 39 6821 a 142 b 1678 ab NS 0.052 Greenbean, sweet 2,3-Butanedione 79434 a 38761 ab 23908 b 76811 24713 40579 0.054 0.072 Buttery 2,5-dimethyl- pyrazine 7730 b 11876 b 38074 a 5089 b 21488 ab 31104 a 0.016 0.049 Roasted 3-methyl butanal 17871 27468 40522 4852 b 16453 b 64555 a NS 0.022 Meaty, roasted Decanal 1855 4257 2970 5591 a 2327 b 1163 b NS 0.0044 Waxy, smokey Dimethyl sulfide 1236 1455 1492 1041 ab 549 b 2594 a NS 0.076 Sickly Ethyl-benzene 10593 3402 3663 12178 a 3278 ab 2202 b NS 0.058 Fruity Heptanal 87927 55096 94405 115079 a 88638 ab 33712 b NS 0.035 Oily, rancid Methyl- pyrazine 4809 6873 15640 1537 b 8873 ab 16914 a NS 0.030 Roasted Nonanal 80950 95146 104488 151611 a 77333 b 51641 b NS 0.0009 Green, moldy Octanal 58039 52305 70606 101429 a 49975 b 29548 b NS 0.0039 Soapy, fatty Phenyl acetaldehyde 28 b 872 ab 2433 a 519 1759 1056 0.097 NS Rosy, perfume Styrene 64622 55131 53426 91312 a 37145 b 44722 b NS 0.042 Sweet Toluene 36640 a 3574 ab 1777 b 5348 33571 3071 0.081 NS Paint thinner Trimethyl- pyrazine 2314 ab 449 b 8695 a -505 5743 6219 0.098 NS Nutty, roasted a,b Means in a row within either the temperature or steak thickness treatment with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05)

Figure 1. Cooking surface temperature affects skillet and steak temperatures. Figure 2. Steak thickness affects skillet and steak temperatures For more information contact: National Cattlemen's Beef Association A Contractor to the Beef Checkoff 9110 East Nichols Avenue Centennial, Colorado 80112-3450 (303) 694-0305