PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

Similar documents
PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

2008 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR

PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

2014 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VAREITY TRIAL REPORT. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR

New Cultivars and Research in Canola Production

Edamame Variety Trial Phone: Fax: Materials and Methods

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

1

Klamath Experiment Station

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

2011 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox and Phil Atkins Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

PERFORMANCE OF FOUR FORAGE TURNIP VARIETIES AT MADRAS, OREGON, J. Loren Nelson '

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

Carol A. Miles, Ph. D., Agricultural Systems Specialist 1919 NE 78 th Street Vancouver, Washington 98665

SUNFLOWER HYBRIDS ADAPTED TO THE FINNISH GROWING CONDITIONS

Niche Market Dry Bean Variety Trial Materials and Methods

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

2013 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Western Regional Dry Pea, Lentil and Chickpea Trials

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

What is Canola? Basic Canola Agronomics. Heath Sanders Canola Field Specialist Great Plains Canola Assoc. March 31 st 2014

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Western Regional Dry Pea, Lentil and Chickpea Trials

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Organic Seed Partnership

EVALUATION OF FOURTEEN TOMATO CULTIVARS IN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN Ron Goldy & Virginia Wendzel Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center

Vivekanandan, K. and G. D. Bandara. Forest Department, Rajamalwatta Road, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka.

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Ames Plantation, Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith. Interpretative Summary

Spring Canola Variety Performance in Iowa 2007 Final Report

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

AVOCADOS IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY

Title: Cultivar Evaluation for Control of Common Smut in Sweet Corn and High Plains Virus in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington.

Plant root activity is limited to the soil bulbs Does not require technical expertise to. wetted by the water bottle emitter implement

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Selecting Collard Varieties Based on Yield, Plant Habit and Bolting 1

Midwest Vegetable Trial Report for 2018

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Dune - the first canola quality Brassica juncea (Juncea canola) cultivar and future Juncea canola research priorities for Australia

Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

NE-1020 Cold Hardy Wine Grape Cultivar Trial

THE 2017 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Comparing canola and lupin varieties by time of sowing in the Northern Agricultural Region

Soybean Production State Extension Conference

Washington State Wine 101

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

FORAGE YIELD AND SOILBORNE MOSAIC VIRUS RESISTANCE OF SEVERAL VARIETIES OF RYE, TRITICALE, AND WHEAT

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

Archival copy. For current information, see the OSU Extension Catalog:

ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF LOUISIANA SUGARCANE PRODUCTION IN 2017

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary.

Slicing Cucumber Performance in Southwest Michigan

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

Spring & Winter Safflower as a Potential Crop South Plains Region, Texas

THE 2017 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Primocane Fruiting Blackberry Trial Results

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

What Effect do Nitrogen Fertilization Rate and Harvest Date Have on Cranberry Fruit Yield and Quality?

HISTORY USES AND HEALTH BENEFITS. Figure 31. Nanking cherries

Canola D.T. Ehrensing

Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance

1999 Annual Report. RED-SKINNED AND CHIPPING POTATO VARIETY DEVELOPMENT K.A. Rykbost and B.A. Charlton 1

PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS. Department of Horticulture

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

2004 Garlic Trial in Northeastern Illinois

western Canadian flaxseed 2003

2014 Agrium AT Fertilizer Trial Glen R. Obear and Bill Kreuser, Ph.D University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Objectives

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

Title: Control of Wild Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in 'Jubilee' Sweet Corn in the Willamette Valley, 1987.

Wine Grape Cultivar Trial Performance in 2008

What is Saffron? Saffron is the dry stigma of Crocus sativus L. flowers. Flowering: autumn. In cultivation for over 3,500 yr

Working With Your Environment. Phenotype = Genotype x Environment

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

EVALUATION OF PISTACHIO BREEDING SELECTIONS ANNUAL FULL REPORT

Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations in West Virginia

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

Edamame Variety Trial Report 1999

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

Marvin Butler, Rhonda Simmons, and Ralph Berry. Abstract. Introduction

Results and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe

Lack of irrigation in 2002 reduced Riesling crop in Timothy E. Martinson Finger Lakes Grape Program

Report to Pennsylvania Vegetable Marketing and Research Program and Pennsylvania Vegetable Growers Association

2009 National Cool-Season Traffic Trial. Seed Companies and Breeders. Kevin N. Morris, Executive Director. DATE: July 6, 2009

rciion egelaihe D Sweet corn varieties tested

Transcription:

2009-2010 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL Jim B. Davis 1, Jack Brown 1, Don Wysocki 2, and Nick Sirovatka 2 1 PSES Dept., University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2339 2 Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT A winter rapeseed and canola variety trial with 23 canola or industrial rapeseed (Brassica napus or B. rapa) cultivars or advanced breeding lines was grown at six locations in the inland Pacific Northwest. Mean yield by location ranged from 1,771 to 4,558 lbs. per acre, and mean yields of individual cultivars across all locations ranged from 1,551 to 3,589 lbs. per acre. INTRODUCTION For many years, winter rapeseed has been grown on a few thousand acres in the inland Pacific Northwest (PNW) region of the U.S.A. Until the last decade, this production had been exclusively industrial rapeseed with high levels of erucic acid in its oil. The acreage has increased during the last 15 years, and most of this new production has been with cultivars that produce canola-quality oil and meal. Many new cultivars are now available, and yield trials throughout the region are needed to evaluate these new cultivars and to identify more areas in the region that are suited to winter canola or rapeseed production. Roundup Ready winter canola cultivars were available commercially on a limited basis for the first time in the PNW in the fall of 2005 and are now widely available, and growers need to know how the performance of newly released cultivars including herbicide resistance types compares to standard cultivars. In addition, cultivars need to be tested using new direct seed technology to determine varietal responses to tillage method. To address these issues, the University of Idaho founded the Pacific Northwest Winter Canola Variety Trial (PNWWVT) in the fall of 1995. Both commercial cultivars and advanced breeding lines have been tested. In the last 15 years, the project has evaluated 131 winter cultivars or advanced lines representing 16 companies. The 2010 trial was funded by the PNW Canola Research Program, the University of Idaho, and fees paid by the commercial companies that submit their cultivars or advanced breeding lines to be tested in the PNWWVT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-three Brassica napus canola or rapeseed cultivars and breeding lines plus three control cultivars; Dwarf Essex industrial rapeseed (B. napus), Bridger industrial rapeseed (B. napus), and Salut canola (B. rapa), were planted in the fall of 2009 at eight locations (Table 1). The trial included canola entries from several sources; DL Seeds, Monsanto Company, Alternative Ag Products (AAP) and the University of Idaho Canola, Rapeseed and Mustard Program. All entries were canola-quality cultivars except the two rapeseed controls and Durola industrial

rapeseed, formerly 06UIWH.5.1, from the University of Idaho. Five of the cultivars entered were Roundup Ready types, and these are designated with RR in their names. Table 1. Location, tillage regime, and planting date of trials in the 2009-2010 Pacific Northwest Winter Canola Variety Trial. Location Tillage Regime Planting Date Moses Lake, WA irrigated, conventional till Sept 4, 2009 Reardan, WA direct seed, chem fallow Aug 21, 2009 Moscow, ID conventional fallow Aug 19, 2009 Moscow, ID direct seed, chem fallow Aug 19, 2009 Lewiston, ID conventional fallow Aug 28, 2009 Craigmont, ID conventional fallow Aug 20, 2009 Pendleton, OR conventional fallow Sept 14, 2009 Hermiston, OR irrigated, conventional till Sept 17, 2009 The trial design used in the regional trials was a randomized, complete block with four replications. Plot size was 4 by 16 ft., and the seeding rate was approximately 8 lbs. per acre. Trials were fertilized according to local practice. The plots at six sites established and grew well throughout the growing season. However, dry conditions at planting time resulted in no or poor seedling emergence at Lewiston and the Moscow direct seed site. At Moscow direct seed site, the established plants were killed by unusually cold freezes in October and December. Other sites showed differential winter kill from these freezes, and winter survival notes were taken. The dates of 50% bloom and plant canopy heights were recorded at the Moscow sites. Prior to harvest, all plots at each site were cut with a small plot swather to allow the plant stems to dry to aid harvest. After harvest, the seed from each plot was weighed to determine yield, and a subsample was taken for oil content estimation with a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analyzer. RESULTS Mean flower date was day 131 (days from Jan 1, i.e., May 16). The earliest cultivars were Salut and Ericka, flowering on day 116 and 126, respectively. The date of flowering ranged from day 116 to day 138, or about two week s difference (Table 2). The latest flowering cultivar was DKW 41-10 RR. Mean plant height was 55 inches, with 06UIWC.1 and Ericka being the shortest cultivars at 52 and 53 inches, and 03.WC.9.302.3 being the tallest at 59 inches. Other tall cultivars included Baldur, 06UIWC.4, UI.07.15, and 03.WBD.63.R-10 The only site with a significant amount of lodging was at Grangeville, where all cultivars exhibited severe lodging. The trial mean was 3,039 lbs. per acre, and mean yields from the sites ranged from 1,796 lbs. per acre at the Pendleton site to 4,586 lbs. per acre at the Moses Lake site (Table 2). Cultivars yielded from 1,551 lbs. per acre to 3,589 lbs. per acre when averaged across all locations. The highest yielding line was Visby (3,589 lbs. per acre) for the third year in a row, followed by Amanda (formerly 06UIWC.5 ) at 3584 lbs. per acre, and UI.05.6.33 at 3,533 lbs. per acre.

Oil content was determined on all harvested plots (Table 2). The mean oil content across all varieties and sites was 40.7%. The site with the highest oil content was Pendleton at 44.6%, while the Reardan site had the lowest oil content, 37.5%. Mean oil contents of the individual varieties ranged from 37.4% to 43.4%. As expected, the industrial rapeseed cultivars had the highest oil contents, but a few canola varieties also performed well with oil contents above 40 %. DISCUSSION As in previous years these trials demonstrated that even with timely late summer rains, establishing winter canola can be difficult at some sites, especially in direct seed situations. In fact, the only direct seed site was abandoned this year because of poor emergence and winterkill. Cropping systems with irrigation or traditional fallow in intermediate to high rainfall zones continue to provide the best chance for establishing a winter canola crop. Recent discussions of winter canola establishment within the PNW canola-growing community have focused on earlier planting times to take advantage of the greater amount of moisture available in fallow soils in midsummer. Several growers in the region planted winter canola in early and mid July, 2009. In general, the crop established well at this time; although some problems were encountered. The problems included severe aphid pressure in late August and early September, premature bolting of at least one cultivar, and some drought-stressed patches. Two early-planted variety trials were planted as well, one near Dusty, Washington that was managed by University of Idaho personnel, and one near Davenport, Washington that was managed by Washington State University personnel. Unfortunately, most of the early planted winter canola was killed by two unusually hard freezes. The first freeze occurred in mid- October, 2009 when temperatures dropped from near 40 o F to around 15 o F in less than 24 hours. This was the first frost in most locations in the PNW, and plants had not acclimated to temperatures below freezing. A second hard freeze occurred in early December, 2009 with temperatures around 0 o F accompanied by high winds and no snow cover. Most canola planted at traditional times survived these freezes, although differential winter kill was observed in the variety trials. The early canola plants were quite lush at the time of the first freeze, and perhaps this lush growth and subsequent drought stress and insect pressure limited the plants ability to acclimate or harden to cold temperatures. Additional early planted trials are underway to gain further insight. Progress in cultivar development is being made; newer cultivars tested in 2010 continued to show high yield potential compared to those tested in previous years. In addition, several new breeding lines, which had not been tested regionally in the past, produced promising results. However, work needs to continue to develop cultivars that are better adapted to direct seed systems and that have increased winter hardiness, especially in the seedling stage to allow later planting when required.

Table 2. Results from the 2009-2010 PNW Winter Canola Variety Trial including mean yield of all sites (lbs./acre), yield rank, yield by site (lbs./acre), winter survivial score, flower date, (days after planting), plant height (inches), and lodging score. Yield by Site Mean Craigmont Moses Hermiston Winter Flower Plant Variety Yield Rank Moscow Reardan Lake Pendleton Survival 1 Start 2 Height 2 Lodging 3 lbs. per acre ------------------------- lbs. per acre ------------------------ score 4 days inches score 4 Controls Salut 1551 23 238 2525 720 3128 422 2272 6.2 116 50 8.3 Bridger Rapeseed 2743 21 1647 3901 1023 3924 1923 4042 5.9 131 53 4.0 Dwarf Essex Rapeseed 3126 10 2102 4257 1598 4301 2465 4035 5.9 129 55 5.8 DL Seeds Visby 3589 1 2346 5199 1871 5799 1844 4473 6.5 133 55 8.8 Sitro 3438 4 2335 4559 1992 4416 1911 5415 7.1 134 55 7.8 Baldur 3230 6 2177 4277 2033 4686 1914 4291 5.5 129 58 9.0 HyCLASS 154W RR 3090 13 2226 3945 2106 4258 2005 3997 4.9 133 57 8.8 Monsanto DKW 41-10 RR 2375 22 1678 4021 1475 2411 1784 2882 6.2 138 49 6.0 DKW 46-15 RR 2896 17 1686 4693 1963 4006 1513 3513 6.4 131 55 9.0 DKW 47-15 RR 2785 20 1426 3270 1422 4236 1954 4400 3.9 130 54 7.5 Alternative Ag Products (AAP)/University of Idaho Amanda 3584 2 2215 5057 2624 5245 1679 4682 6.8 133 56 8.8 Durola Rapeseed 3108 12 1532 4572 1931 5226 1472 3912 5.6 133 56 8.5 University of Idaho Athena 2893 18 1962 4210 1225 4203 1547 4210 5.4 134 55 9.0 Ericka 2866 19 1621 3966 2282 4348 1349 3628 7.1 126 53 8.5 06UIWC.1 3074 14 1687 3914 2722 4851 1602 3665 7.0 127 52 7.0 06UIWC.4 2980 15 2150 4229 1629 4543 1994 3334 5.2 135 58 7.8 03WC.4.226.8 3184 8 2402 3019 1643 5835 1862 4345 4.1 133 55 7.5 03WC.8.316.1 3109 11 2204 2893 1780 5066 2371 4338 4.1 133 56 8.5 03WC.9.302.3 3198 7 2262 4534 2448 4208 1968 3767 6.7 133 59 9.0 03WC.29.327.4 3413 5 2105 4306 2410 5172 2237 4245 5.0 133 56 8.5 03WL.4.2.104.1 3162 9 1832 3833 1700 5502 1838 4268 5.4 133 55 8.0 03WDB.63-R.10 2963 16 1902 3588 2061 4460 1642 4128 4.1 133 58 8.5 UI.05.6.33 3533 3 2288 4390 2853 5651 2022 3993 7.2 130 55 7.5 Mean 3039 1914 4050 1892 4586 1796 3993 5.7 131 55 7.9 LSD (p=0.05) 299 396 811 919 965 495 718 1.6 2.5 3.3 1.1 C.V. (%) 18.4 14.6 14.2 34.2 15.0 19.8 12.8 17.5 1.4 4.2 9.7 Notes: 1. Survival scored at Moscow, Craigmont, and Reardan. 2. Flower Start and Height scored at Moscow. 3. Lodging scored at Craigmont. 4. Scores are 1 to 9, with 9 being best.

Table 3. Mean seed oil content (%) estimated by NMR, rank by meal oil content, and mean oil content (%) by site of varieties entered in the 2009-2010 PNW Winter Canola Variety Trial. Variety Mean Oil Content Oil Rank Moscow Craigmont Oil Content by Site Moses Lake Reardan Pendleton Hermiston % ---------------------------------------- % ------------------------------------------ Controls Salut 37.4 23 33.0 39.7 38.9 33.3 40.5 38.9 Bridger Rapeseed 41.4 6 39.7 42.4 39.1 38.1 45.8 43.3 Dwarf Essex Rapeseed 42.0 2 39.7 43.0 40.1 39.4 48.0 42.1 DL Seeds Visby 40.6 16 38.0 42.5 39.6 37.2 44.3 41.9 Sitro 40.7 15 38.7 41.4 39.6 36.3 45.6 42.8 Baldur 41.1 10 39.6 41.9 39.2 37.9 45.3 42.8 HyCLASS 154W RR 40.6 17 39.1 42.7 38.8 36.6 44.1 42.2 Monsanto DKW 41-10 RR 38.7 22 37.6 40.2 35.9 36.5 41.9 40.1 DKW 46-15 RR 41.3 7 38.4 43.5 39.7 38.0 44.9 43.3 DKW 47-15RR 38.9 21 36.7 40.3 37.9 33.4 44.1 41.3 Alternative Ag Products (AAP) / University of Idaho Amanda 41.1 8 39.1 42.7 39.7 39.0 44.5 41.8 Durola Rapeseed 43.4 1 41.6 45.4 41.8 39.6 46.9 45.0 University of Idaho Athena 40.5 18 38.9 42.5 39.7 36.0 44.2 41.8 Ericka 39.8 19 37.2 40.8 38.5 39.0 43.2 40.0 06UIWC.1 39.0 20 35.7 41.2 38.3 36.7 42.0 40.1 06UIWC.4 40.7 14 40.3 41.5 39.1 38.0 44.0 41.6 03WC.4.226.8 41.0 12 39.7 41.0 40.2 38.0 45.0 41.9 03WC.8.316.1 41.4 5 40.1 41.9 40.8 38.1 45.8 41.9 03WC.9.302.3 41.0 11 39.6 42.8 39.7 37.8 44.7 41.6 03WC.29.327.4 41.5 4 39.6 42.5 40.4 39.0 46.2 41.7 03WL.4.2.104.1 41.1 9 39.8 42.4 40.9 36.3 45.0 42.4 03WDB.63-R.10 41.6 3 40.2 42.2 40.4 38.7 45.4 42.6 UI.05.6.33 40.8 13 39.0 42.0 40.0 38.8 43.7 41.1 Trial Mean 40.7 38.7 42.0 39.5 37.5 44.6 41.8 LSD (p = 0.5%) 0.5 1.0 1.2 1.3 2.8 1.1 0.6 C.V. (%) 2.4 1.8 2.0 2.3 5.3 1.7 1.1