Processing Peach Cultivar Evaluations 2004 Progress Report

Similar documents
WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY:

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

NE-1020 Cold Hardy Wine Grape Cultivar Trial

2014 Agrium AT Fertilizer Trial Glen R. Obear and Bill Kreuser, Ph.D University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Objectives

Tomato Variety Observations 2009

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

Pruning and Training Young Walnuts Bruce Lampinen UC Davis Plant Sciences

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C.

A Field Evaluation of Select Wine Grape Varieties for the Aurora and Medford Areas of Oregon- A Progress Report

PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS. Department of Horticulture

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Demonstration Vineyard for Seedless Table Grapes for Cool Climates

Title: Evaluation of Apogee for Control of Runner Growth in Annual Plasticulture Strawberries

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

National Turfgrass Evaluation Program (NTEP) 2005 Kentucky Bluegrass Variety Trial Final Report. J. S. Ebdon, Ph. D., and W. T.

Pruning Berries, Grapes and Kiwi

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Annual Bluegrass (Poa annua L.) Control In Non-Overseeded Bermudagrass Turf Report

Physiology, Orchard Establishment, Cultivars, Training/Pruning. Lenny Wells UGA Extension Horticulture

Growing vines in sites infested with Xiphinema index

Ison s Nursery & Vineyard Planting Instructions Pakistan Mulberry Trees

0\ Horticuilture Series 609 January 1990

Organic Seed Partnership

Performance of cool-climate grape varieties in Delta County. Horst Caspari Colorado State University Western Colorado Research Center

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

Influence of fungicides and cultivar on development of cavity spot of carrot.

Yield, Income, Quality, and Blotchy Ripening Susceptibility of Staked Tomato Cultivars in Central Kentucky

HISTORY USES AND HEALTH BENEFITS. Figure 31. Nanking cherries

Research Progress towards Mechanical Harvest of New Mexico Pod-type Green Chile

CHEMICAL THINNING OF APPLE UNDER NORWEGIAN CONDITIONS. WHAT WORKS?

What Effect do Nitrogen Fertilization Rate and Harvest Date Have on Cranberry Fruit Yield and Quality?

North San Joaquin Valley Almond Day

FORAGE YIELD AND SOILBORNE MOSAIC VIRUS RESISTANCE OF SEVERAL VARIETIES OF RYE, TRITICALE, AND WHEAT

Common Problems in Grape Production in Alabama. Dr. Elina Coneva Department of Horticulture, Auburn University

Midwest Vegetable Trial Report for 2018

Bacterial canker of sweet cherry in Oregon Disease symptoms, cycle, and management

Final Report. TITLE: Developing Methods for Use of Own-rooted Vitis vinifera Vines in Michigan Vineyards

Pomegranate Diseases: What do we know and where are we heading? Achala KC and Gary Vallad FPA Grower s Meeting Wimauma, FL 03/04/2016

Willsboro Grape Variety Trial Willsboro Research Farm Willsboro, NY

University of California Cooperative Extension Tulare County. Grape Notes. Volume 3, Issue 4 May 2006

Stella Maris on Wine Grapes. Spring, 2018

Title: Cultivar Evaluation for Control of Common Smut in Sweet Corn and High Plains Virus in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington.

To study the effects of four different levels of fertilizer NPK nutrients, applied at a ratio of N:P 2

MALUMA HASS : A NEW RELEASED CULTIVAR IN COMPARISON WITH HASS

MALUMA HASS : A NEW RELEASED CULTIVAR IN COMPARISON WITH HASS

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

LA Early : A New Early Market Satsuma

2013 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Summary of Grape Variety and Rootstock Performance Data Oklahoma Fruit and Pecan Research Station Perkins, OK

Key words: fruit breeding, cultivar description, pollenizer, tetraploidy, few-seeded fruit

Canopy Management. M of W 08/02/2012. Plumpton College

Performance of cool-climate grape varieties in Delta County. Horst Caspari Colorado State University Western Colorado Research Center

PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

2008 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR

Suggestions for Improving the Storage Potential of Honeycrisp

Project Concluding: Summary Report Mandarin Trial for the California Desert

Strawberry Variety Trial

2004 Grape Variety Trial at Rogers Mesa. Horst Caspari

PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Results and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe

Plant root activity is limited to the soil bulbs Does not require technical expertise to. wetted by the water bottle emitter implement

Bounty71 rootstock an update

Do lower yields on the vine always make for better wine?

VINTAGE REPORT. Debbie Lauritz SENIOR WINEMAKER. Marty Gransden VITICULTURALIST MEDIA RELEASE: APRIL, 2016

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

Progress Report 2008: Stone Fruit Introduction Methods Results and Discussion

Jefferson Hazelnut (OSU ) EM 9028 July Rebecca L. McCluskey, Shawn A. Mehlenbacher, and David C. Smith. Tree growth and habit.

Evolution of Grapegrowing Techniques and New Viticulture Ideas in Spain. Jesús Yuste.

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

2019 Annual 4-H Plant Sale

Corn Information for North Carolina Corn Growers

Early St. Ann : A New Early Maturing Satsuma Mandarin

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Ames Plantation, Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith. Interpretative Summary

WEED CONTROL IN SWEET CORN RESEARCH RESULTS 2006 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Title: Plum / Roma Tomato Variety Trial 2014 (year 2 of 2) Report to Pennsylvania Vegetable Marketing Research Program

Grape Weed Control. Harlene Hatterman-Valenti North Dakota State University

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

Wine Grape Trellis and Training Systems

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

AMINOFIT.Xtra, SOME TEST RESULTS

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

NATIONAL TURFGRASS EVALUATION PROGRAM

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2009

Effect of Storage Period and Ga3 Soaking of Bulbs on Growth, Flowering and Flower Yield of Tuberose (Polianthes Tuberosa L.) Cv.

Managing crop load with Artifical Spur Extinction

THE THREAT: The disease leads to dieback in shoots and fruiting buds and an overall decline in walnut tree health.

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

Title: Report, High Tunnel Fresh Market Slicer Tomato Variety Trial 2010

Seasonal Programs for Control of Turfgrass Diseases

Australia and Beyond: Research & Grower Experiences. Dr. Mercy Olmstead Stone Fruit Extension Specialist

Transcription:

Processing Peach Cultivar Evaluations 2004 Progress Report Cedar Springs Research Station Ridgetown College University of Guelph J.W. Zandstra G.J. Watt

TITLE: PROCESSING PEACH CULTIVAR EVALUATION EXPERIMENT DETAILS Experimental Design: Randomized complete block design Treatments: 11 Replications: 4 Plot size: 1 tree FIELD PROGRAM Location: Soil Type: Soil Management: Cedar Springs Research Station Fox gravelly loam Permanent sod with a herbicide strip Sod: creeping red fescue 50% kentucky blue grass 10% perennial ryegrass 40% Seeding Rate: 44 Kg/Ha Planting Date: 01 May, 2000 Planting Method: Tree auger Tree Spacing: 3.65 * 5.5 m (12 ft * 18 ft.) Trees/Hectare: 500 trees/ha. Cultivars: Rootstock: 1. V84061 7. Vinegold 2. V84072 8. Virgil 3. V85168 9. Catherina 4. V851610 10. Babygold 7 5. V85169 11. Venture 6. Vulcan Bailey Training System: Irrigation System: Central Leader System Trickle irrigation Two emitters per tree (1 gallon/hour) 1

Harvest Protocol -Processing Peaches Ratings based on a scoring system as follows (unless otherwise stated) 9 = exceptional 7 = good 5 = commercially acceptable < 5 = unacceptable 1. Wi - Winter Injury amount of dead bloom and length of dead tips on shoots 2. Pc - amount of peach canker 9 = no canker; 7 = small branches; 5 = major scaffold; 3 = loss of scaffold 3. Bd - bloom date: date at which 80% of flowers are open 4. Cr - weight of fruit at harvest (kg/tree) 5. Cu - cumulative yield over harvest years (kg/tree) 6. Rd - ripe date. Date of first commercial harvest 7. Un - uniformity of fruit on the tree 1 harvest = 9; 2 harvest = 8; 3 harvests = 7 etc 8. Fs - Fruit size 9 = > 3" 6 = 2 ½ - 2 3/4" 3 = 2 1/8-2 1/4" 8 = 2 3/4-3" 5 = 2 1/2" 2 = 2-2 1/8" 7 = 2 3/4" 4 = 2 1/4-2 1/2" 1 = < 2" 9. Sp - splot pits; none = 9; 5% = 7; 10% = 5; 25% = 3 10. Ls - leaf spot very resistant = 9; moderately resistant = 7; somewhat susceptible = 5; very susceptible =3 11. Fs - fruit spot; same as above 12. Or - overall rating; considers above ratings and also includes susceptibility to diseases, skin pubescence etc. 2

Table 1: Summary of annual trunk diameters. Processing peach cultivar trial. Cedar Springs Research Station, Ridgetown College, University of Guelph, 2004. Cultivar Trunk Diameter (mm) At Planting Fall 2001 Fall, 2002 Fall, 2003 Fall, 2004 V84061 21.6 41.3 61.3 77.3 90.0 V84072 16.0 40.3 62.0 73.3 83.3 V85168 21.3 35.0 44.7 59.3 71.0 V851610 20.0 45.0 64.3 73.2 89.8 V85169 16.8 42.3 71.5 78.0 77.0 Vulcan 21.0 39.0 74.0 89.0 99.0 Vinegold 14.3 37.0 53.5 74.3 92.8 Virgil 15.3 37.5 53.5 71.8 80.0 Catherina 21.5 44.0 68.8 86.8 95.3 Babygold 7 14.5 33.5 65.0 83.0 93.0 Venture* 7.5 23.3 43.0 67.0 80.5 * Note: replaced in spring 2001. 3

Table 2: Tree and fruit characteristics. Processing peach cultivar trial. Cedar Springs Research Station, Ridgetown College, University of Guelph, 2004. Cultivar* 1. Wi 2. Pc 3. Bd 4. Cr 5. Cu 6. Rd 7. Un 8. Fs 9. Sp 10. Ls 11. Fs 12. Or V84061 (3) 9.0 9.0 14 May 14.3 39.9 23 Aug 9 8.3 7.0 9.0 9.0 7.7 V84072 (3) 9.0 9.0 15 May 8.2 34.8 06 Sept 9 8.0 9.0 9.0 5.0 5.0 V85168 (3) 9.0 9.0 15 May 6.0 14.2 07 Sept 9 7.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 5.0 V851610 (4) 9.0 9.0 15 May 11.9 19.0 10 Oct 9 8.0 9.0 9.0 7.0 1.0 V85169 (2) 9.0 9.0 14 May 20.7 51.5 07 Sept 9 8.0 9.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vulcan (1) 7.0 7.0 14 May 4.8 8.4 11 Aug 9 6.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 5.0 Vinegold (4) 5.0 7.0 16 May 12.3 20.9 17 Aug 9 8.0 7.0 9.0 9.0 7.0 Virgil (4) 5.0 9.0 13 May 23.4 43.6 20 Aug 9 7.7 8.3 9.0 9.0 7.7 Catherina (4) 5.0 9.0 14 May 8.6 15.0 27 Aug 8 8.0 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 Babygold 7 (1) 5.0 9.0 11 May 8.7 8.7 16 Sept 9 8.0 9.0 9.0 5.0 9.0 Venture (4) 9.0 9.0 11 May 10.9 15.7 12 Sept 9 8.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 5.0 * - number behind the cultivar indicates the number of trees in the trial. Losses were not able to be replaced due to availability of cultivars outside quarantine zones in Niagara. DISCUSSION The trees were pruned too heavily in 3 of the 4 replicates in the spring of 2004, which reduced yield potential. Virgil continues to be the highest yielding commercial variety, followed by Vinegold. V85169 is the highest yielding numbered selection, which is consistent with the 2003 data. Babygold 7 was rated highest overall in terms of fruit quality, disease, fruit size, while V84061 was the highest rated numbered selection. Vulcan and Catherina trees have the largest trunk diameter suggesting the greatest vigor. Winter injury was minimal to moderate, and only apparent in the named commercial cultivars. Vulcan is the earliest maturing variety in the trial; V84061 is the earliest maturing numbered selection. V851610 is very late maturing, with harvest occurring on 10 October; at this point the fruit quality was still not ideal but it was getting so late in the season that it was harvested so data could be collected. Given the late 4

maturity, the usefulness of this cultivar in southwestern Ontario is questionable. 5