Fungicide sensitivity of Botrytis cinerea causing gray mold of berries in WA

Similar documents
Management of Resistance to Fungicides used for Botrytis Control in Berries

Botrytis Control In Berries Key project cooperators

ALAN SCHREIBER AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. TOM WALTERS WALTERS AG RESEARCH

Residue Decline Curves for Blueberries and Raspberries or How To Meet MRLs in Export Markets

Alan Schreiber Agriculture Development Group, Inc. Tom Walters Walters Ag Research

Management and research of fruit rot diseases in vineyards

Virginia Wine Board Project # Annual Progress Report - July 2015

Treatments protocol # Color Materials Timing FP/A Tol 1 W Untreated Y 2 OD Rovral 50WP

Late-season disease control options to manage diseases, but minimize fermentation problems and wine defects

Grape. Disease Control

Control of Botrytis cinereain strawberries with Gliocladiumcatenulatumvectored by bumblebees

Characteristics and Monitoring of Fungicide-Resistant Grape Powdery Mildew

Your headline here in Calibri.

Fungicide Timing and Selection Conundrum 2015 Annual Report

Fruit Crops Grapes. Diseases of Grapes and Fungicides Labeled for Control. Disease Fungicides a Efficacy b

GRAPE POWDERY MILDEW: MANAGEMENT AND RESISTANCE

Grape disease control Update for 2015

Melanie L. Lewis Ivey and Rachel Medina Fruit Pathology Program Department of Plant Pathology The Ohio State University-Wooster Campus Wooster, OH

Ontogenetical resistance of grapes - a chance to reduce fungicide residues in wines?

Prospects for the prevention in the field and the in post harvest of brown rot and lenticell rot

Efficacy of Pre-harvest Fungicide Applications and Cold Storage for Postharvest Control of Botrytis Fruit Rot (Gray Mold) on Red Raspberry

Merivon Xemium Brand Fungicide

The Power of Native Yeasts

Improving the management of plant and fruit diseases affecting strawberry production in Australia and Florida

soils. Proper disease identification is crucial to developing management strategies.

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION... UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA FRUIT AND NUT NOTES

Commercial Crop Production Small Fruit - Grapes

Fungicide control of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot on grape: 2014 field trial

Organic viticulture research in Pennsylvania. Jim Travis, Bryan Hed, and Noemi Halbrendt Department of Plant Pathology Penn State University

2008 Research Report to the Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council

WALNUT BLIGHT CONTROL USING XANTHOMONAS JUGLANDIS BUD POPULATION SAMPLING

Vinews Viticulture Information News, Week of 17 August 2015 Columbia, MO

PEACH BLOSSOM BLIGHT Biology, Control, and Fungicide Resistance Management

Fungicide Resistance. Management in Apple and Pear Pathogens. Introduction. Resistance terminology

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 12 July 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Updates to the Midwest Fruit Pest Management Guide. New Publication Title. Grape Bud Break to Prebloom. Grape Pre-bloom through Bloom

Management of cucurbit diseases in the panhandle: Notes for 2016

Survey of grape powdery and downy mildew sensitivity to commonly used fungicides,

Control of Powdery Mildew in Wine Grape. N.L. Rothwell and K.L. Powers, NWMHRS A. Schilder, Dept. of Plant Pathology, MSU

Strawberry Pests and Diseases: IPM Studies and the Pallidosis-related Decline

Evaluation of fungal populations as it relates to fruit rot incidence in Oregon

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

Strategies for improving the control of plant and fruit diseases affecting strawberry fields in Queensland and Florida

Final Report: Evaluation of fungicide programs for management of Botrytis bunch rot of grapes: 2017 field trials

Determination of Fungicide Resistance in Botrytis cinerea from Strawberry in the Central Coast Region of California

Fungicide Control of Phomopsis Cane and Leaf Spot on Grapevine: 2015 Field Trial

Prepared by Louise Ferguson, Mark Bell, Mark Henderson

Commercial Crop Production Small Fruit - Grapes

The NEW Benchmark Fungicide for Grape Growers. Grapes A GUIDE FOR GRAPE GROWERS. Superior Multi-Crop Control

Botanigard WP best practice application guide

Powdery Mildew and Bunch Rot: A Different Perspective

Monitoring Ripening for Harvest and Winemaking Decisions

Botector Product User Manual

Harvest Preparation. Production. Domestic Production. Table Grape Cultivars & Maturity. Table Grape Maturity. Arpaia Kiwifruit/Figs 6/20/2013

Arpaia Kiwifruit/Figs 6/18/2014. Harvesting and Handling of Grapes. Production

Sustainable grape production for the reestablishment of Iowa s grape industry

MONITORING WALNUT TWIG BEETLE ACTIVITY IN THE SOUTHERN SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY: OCTOBER 2011-OCTOBER 2012

Property of Life Scientific. Do Not Copy MODIF MAPP 18583

A new option to control BOTRYTIS in wine grapes

Mapping and Detection of Downy Mildew and Botrytis bunch rot Resistance Loci in Norton-based Population

Spotted wing drosophila in southeastern berry crops

Corn Earworm: Is It Resistant to Pyrethroids?

UPCOMING MEETINGS: April/May 2006 Issue GENERAL ORCHARD CHECKLIST FOR APRIL/MAY: PRUNE ORCHARD SPECIFIC CHECKLIST FOR APRIL/MAY:

SWD Identification Key Characteristics. Drosophila suzukii Spotted Wing Drosophila (SWD) SWD Fruit Hosts

ReTain is Now Labeled for Stone Fruit Except Cherries. Source: John Strang and Joe Masabni, Kentucky Extension Fruit and Vegetable Specialists

Quadrilateral vs bilateral VSP An alternative option to maintain yield?

Downy mildew resistance to QoI fungicides is rampant in Georgia vineyards

Walnut Blight What Happened in Richard P. Buchner, Steven E. Lindow, James E. Adaskaveg, Cyndi K. Gilles and Renee Koutsoukis

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

WALNUT BLIGHT MANAGEMENT USING XANTHOMONAS ARBORICOLA PV JUGLANDIS DORMANT BUD POPULATION SAMPLING

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 4 June 2012 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Managing potato leafhopper in wine grapes

Differences in virulence of Phytophthora capsici isolates from a worldwide collection on tomato fruits

Evaluation of Compost Teas for Disease Management of Wild Blueberries in Nova Scotia

Role of lygus bug in fruit deformity. IPM tools for managing lygus bug

COMPARISON OF BLACKLINE-RESISTANT AND CONVENTIONAL WALNUT VARIETIES IN THE CENTRAL COAST

Restaurant Hygiene Grade Cards. Yvonne Zhuang Melissa Gonzalez Jay De Jesus Nick Tse

EFFECTIVE PROTECTION AGAINST BOTRYTIS ON GRAPES. THE ALTERNATIVE IN GRAPE PROTECTION

Christopher Gee, Ph.D. Field Development Rep II/Technical Service Rep - Fungicides Concord, OH 44077

Management of Sour Rot and Volatile Acidity in Grapes. Ontario Grape and Wine Research Incorporated, Project # Pillar 1

Potato Biology. Structure of a potato plant and tubers Dormancy and sprouting Controlling sprouts in stored potatoes

Influence of fungicides and cultivar on development of cavity spot of carrot.

Berry Group Protection Solutions

Fungicide Resistance of Botrytis Cinerea from Virginia Wine Grapes, Strawberry, and Ornamental Crops. Noah R. Adamo

Resistance to Phomopsis Stem Canker in Cultivated Sunflower 2011 Field Trials

Technical Product Guide

Model for Predicting. Richard Buchner, Steve Lindow, Jim Adaskaveg, Cyndi Gilles and Renee Koutsoukis

Research Report: Use of Geotextiles to Reduce Freeze Injury in Ontario Vineyards

Chris Smart. Plant Pathology and Plant- Microbe Biology Cornell University Geneva, NY

What s the Deal About Black Leg of Brassicas?

Walnut Blight. Luke K. Milliron UC Cooperative Extension Farm Advisor Butte, Tehama, and Glenn Counties. November 7, 2018 UC Walnut Short Course

WALNUT BLIGHT CONTROL USING INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES

Cold Climate Grape IPM

Studies in the Postharvest Handling of California Avocados

Seasonal Programs for Control of Turfgrass Diseases

Fruit Crops Stone Fruits (Peaches, Plums, Etc.)

SYSTEMS USED TO COMBAT OTHER VECTOR TRANSMITTED BACTERIA, PIERCE S DISEASE IN GRAPES. Don Hopkins Mid Florida REC, Apopka

Industry Update Bayer CropScience. Bayer CropScience LABEL UPDATE. Santa Maria Phil McNally March 2014

The Market for Northeastern Grown Hops 1

_Switch 62.5WG_ _139-4.pdf SUPPLEMENTAL LABELING

Transcription:

Fungicide sensitivity of Botrytis cinerea causing gray mold of berries in WA Tobin Peever David Dutton Olga Kozhar Dalphy Harteveld Adrian Alcocer Amreen Toor Department of Plant Pathology, WSU Funding: WRRC WBC WSCPR WSCBG

Objectives Estimate sensitivities to five major fungicides used to control Botrytis cinerea in berries in WA Follow up on studies led by Alan Schreiber, Steve Midboe, Chris Clemons and Jim Adaskaveg in 2012 and 2013

Fungicides Tested Elevate (fenhexamid) - inhibitor of sterol biosynthesis FRAC group 17 Rovral (iprodione) inhibitor of osmoregulation FRAC group 2 Switch (cyprodinil) inhibitor of methionine biosynthesis FRAC group 9 Switch (fludioxonil) inhibitor of osmoregulation FRAC group 12 Pristine (boscalid) inhibitor of respiration FRAC group 7

Methods Screen for sensitivity on agar media amended with fungicides at different concentrations Measured growth of each isolate on a single concentration of fungicide relative to a control plate that did not contain fungicide Estimate growth as percent of control Amount of growth is indication of sensitivity to fungicide

Fungicide Sensitivity Assay no fungicide fungicide

Elevate (fenhexamid) sensitivity WA Raspberry Field #1 1.2 Percent Growth of Control 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.5 5 Less Sensitive Sensitive Fenhexamid concentration (ppm)

Sampling Strategy 2015 Sampled B. cinerea from 6 different hosts including blueberry, raspberry, strawberry, blackberry, wild blackberry, and currants Sampled from 3 counties in WA including Skagit, Whatcom and Island Sampled conventional, organic and untreated fields Host Number of Fields Number of Isolates Blueberry 8 85 Raspberry 8 100 Strawberry 8 100 Blackberry 7 64 Wild Blackberry 4 50 Currant 1 16

Annemiek Schilder Blueberry

Blueberry Sampling Strategy Sampled B. cinerea from 3 blueberry fields in Skagit Co., 1 field in Island Co. and 4 fields in Whatcom Co. in 2015 (n =85) Sampled conventional and low fungicide input fields Field Code County Treatment BC-19-1 Skagit Conventional BC-19-3 Skagit Conventional BC-19-11 Skagit Low Input BC-22-4 Island Low Input BC-19-13 Whatcom Conventional BC-19-6 Whatcom Conventional BC-22-8 Whatcom Conventional BC-19-10 Whatcom Conventional

WA Blueberry Botrytis Fungicide Sensitivity 2015 Proportion Insensitive Isolates Sample Fenhexamid Fludioxonil Iprodione Boscalid Cyprodinil BC-19-1 0.200 0.000 0.000 0.333 0.273 BC-19-3 0.222 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.667 BC-19-11 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.091 BC-22-4 0.417 0.000 0.000 0.182 0.083 BC-19-13 0.714 0.000 0.000 0.714 0.778 BC-19-6 0.583 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.917 BC-22-8 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.375 0.636 BC-19-10 0.667 0.000 0.000 0.833 0.667

WA Blueberry Botrytis 2015 - Fungicide Sensitivity Fenhexamid Boscalid Cyprodinil 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Field 1 Field 2 Field 3 Field 4 Field 5 Field 6 Field 7 Field 8 Skagit Whatcom

Pete Bristow Raspberry

Raspberry Sampling Strategy Sampled B. cinerea from 2 raspberry fields in Skagit Co., and 6 fields in Whatcom Co. in 2015 (n =100) Sampled conventional and low input fields Field Code County Treatment BC-21-1 Skagit Low Input BC-21-5 Skagit Conventional BC-18-1 Whatcom Conventional BC-21-7 Whatcom Conventional BC-21-9 Whatcom Conventional BC-21-10 Whatcom Conventional BC-21-13 Whatcom Conventional BC-21-15 Whatcom Conventional

WA Raspberry Botrytis Fungicide Sensitivity 2015 Proportion Insensitive Isolates Sample Fenhexamid Fludioxonil Iprodione Boscalid Cyprodinil BC-21-1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.071 BC-21-5 0.429 0.000 0.000 0.285 0.214 BC-18-1 0.692 0.000 0.000 0.846 0.769 BC-21-7 0.692 0.000 0.000 0.923 0.846 BC-21-9 0.429 0.000 0.000 0.429 0.428 BC-21-10 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.857 1.000 BC-21-13 0.538 0.000 0.000 0.231 1.000 BC-21-15 0.615 0.000 0.000 0.538 0.333

Botrytis Fungicide Sensitivity WA Raspberry 2015 Fenhexamid Boscalid Cyprodinil 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 Field 2 Field 3 Field 1 Field 4 Field 5 Field 6 Field 7 Field 8 Skagit Whatcom

Strawberry

Strawberry Sampling Strategy Sampled B. cinerea from 4 strawberry fields in Skagit Co., 1 field in Island Co. and 3 fields in Whatcom Co. in 2015 (n =100) Sampled conventional, low input, organic and untreated fields Field Code County Treatment BC-20-1 Skagit Conventional BC-20-2 Skagit Untreated BC-20-3 Skagit Low Input BC-20-4 Skagit Organic BC-20-7 Island Conventional BC-20-8 Whatcom Conventional BC-20-9 Whatcom Conventional BC-20-11 Whatcom Untreated

WA Strawberry Botrytis Fungicide Sensitivity 2015 Proportion Insensitive Isolates Sample Fenhexamid Fludioxonil Iprodione Boscalid Cyprodinil BC-20-1 0.091 0.000 0.000 0.091 0.083 BC-20-2 0.143 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 BC-20-3 0.167 0.000 0.000 0.583 0.417 BC-20-4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 BC-20-7 0.154 0.000 0.000 0.077 0.000 BC-20-8 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.333 0.250 BC-20-9 0.643 0.000 0.000 0.385 0.200 BC-20-11 0.667 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.167

Botrytis Fungicide Sensitivity WA Strawberry 2015 1.00 0.80 Fenhexamid 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 1.00 0.80 Boscalid 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 1.00 0.80 Cyprodinil 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 Field 1 Field 2 Field 3 Field4 Field 5 Field 6 Field 7 Field 8 Skagit Whatcom

WA Botrytis Fungicide Sensitivity Across All Berry Crops 1.000 Proportion Insensitive Isolates 0.800 0.600 0.400 0.200 fenhexamid boscalid cyprodinil 0.000 blueberry 2015 blackberry 2015 strawberry 2015 raspberry 2015 raspberry 2014

Adjacent Raspberry, Strawberry, Blueberry and Blackberry Fields 1 Proportion Insensitive Isolates 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Fenhexamid Boscalid Cyprodinil Strawberry BC-20-9 Blueberry BC-19-13 Blackberry BC-23-3 Strawberry BC-20-7 Blackberry BC-23-4 Raspberry BC-1-1 Blackberry BC-23-2

Conclusions No evidence of highly insensitive isolates to fludioxonil or iprodione in WA Widespread insensitivity to Elevate (fenhexamid) in raspberry need to monitor to determine if frequencies decline Clear correlation of fungicide use history to fungicide insensitivity selection for insensitivity Insensitivity detected to 3 of 5 site-specific fungicides used to control Botrytis in berries some fields have high levels to all 3

Conclusions (cont d) Frequencies of isolates highly insensitive to Rovral (iprodione) have declined since late 1990 s fungicide can be used again but carefully Large variation in frequencies of insensitivity from field to field for a given crop and also among berry crops even adjacent fields Botrytis populations appear to be quite local (ie. no long-distance movement among fields, between adjacent berry crops) Many fields have high levels of insensitivity to cyprodinil, one component of Switch. Does this mean that fludioxonil is masking insensitivity to cyprodinil?

Recommendations Continue to avoid use of Elevate (fenhexamid) monitor populations to determine if resistant isolates decline in frequency Reduce selection pressure reduce number of sprays from each FRAC group to a minimum Reduce reliance on site-specific fungicides by alternating or mixing with non site-specific fungicides like Captan and using other disease control measures when available Use fungicides only when needed timing of application related to infection rather than calendar

Fenhexamid EC 50 WA Raspberry Isolates Sensitive = 0.62 ppm Less-Sensitive = 41.96 ppm 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 EC 50 (ppm)

Boscalid EC 50 WA Raspberry Isolates Sensitive = 1.89 ppm Less-Sensitive = 197.64 ppm 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 EC 50 (ppm)

Cyprodinil EC 50 WA Raspberry Isolates Sensitive = 0.17 ppm Less-Sensitive = 12.73 ppm 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 EC 50 (ppm)

Iprodione EC 50 WA Raspberry Isolates Sensitive = 0.59 ppm Less-Sensitive = 3.43 ppm 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 EC 50 (ppm)

EC 50 Estimates WA Raspberry Isolates Fungicide EC50 Sensitive EC50 Less-Sensitive Fenhexamid 0.62 41.96 Iprodione 0.59 3.43 Boscalid 1.89 197.64 Fludioxonil 0.18 ---- Cyprodinil 0.17 12.73

Summarizing Fungicide Sensitivity in Botrytis cinerea 50 Decreasing sensitivity to the fungicide Number of Isolates 40 30 20 10 0 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 Percent Growth of Control

WA Raspberry Botrytis 2014 Fungicide Sensitivity Proportion Insensitive Isolates Sample Fenhexamid Fludioxonil Iprodione Boscalid Cyprodinil BC-1-1 0.462 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.167 BC-1-2 0.417 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 BC-1-3 0.846 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 BC-1-4 0.636 0.000 0.000 0.300 0.273 BC-1-5 0.900 0.000 0.000 0.417 0.273 BC-1-6 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.100 0.100 BC-1-7 0.909 0.000 0.000 0.091 0.000 BC-1-8 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.111 0.182 BC-1-9 0.333 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 BC-1-10 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 BC-1-11 0.667 0.000 0.000 0.364 0.375 BC-1-12 0.455 0.000 0.000 0.455 0.333 BC-1-13 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

Botrytis Fungicide Sensitivity WA Raspberry 2014 1.00 Fenhexamid 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 1.00 Boscalid 0.80 0.60 0.40 Cyprodinil 0.20 0.00 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 Field 1 Field 2 Field 3 Field 4 Field 5 Field 6 Field 7 Field 8 Field 9 Field 10 Field 11 Field 12 Field 13 Whatcom

Comparison of Fungicide Insensitivities Strawberry vs. Raspberry Proportion Insensitive Isolates Sample Fenhexamid Fludioxonil Iprodione Boscalid Cyprodinil Raspberry 2014 Strawberry 2015 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.13 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.14

WA versus BC Botrytis Fungicide Sensitivity 1.0 Proportion Insensitive Isolates 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 fenhexamid boscalid cyprodinil 0.0 WA BC WA BC WA raspberry 2014 BC raspberry 2014 WA blueberry 2015 BC blueberry 2014 Raspberry Blueberry

Blackberry Blackberry

Blackberry Sampling Strategy Sampled B. cinerea from 3 blackberry fields in Skagit Co., 1 field in Island Co. and 2 fields in Whatcom Co. in 2015 (n =64) Sampled conventional, organic and low fungicide input fields Field Code County Treatment BC-23-1A Skagit Conventional BC-23-1B Skagit Conventional BC-23-7 Skagit Organic BC-23-4 Island Low Input BC-23-2 Whatcom Conventional BC-23-3 Whatcom Conventional

WA Blackberry Botrytis Fungicide Sensitivity 2015 Proportion Insensitive Isolates Sample Fenhexamid Fludioxonil Iprodione Boscalid Cyprodinil BC-23-1A 0.900 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.900 BC-23-1B 0.600 0.000 0.000 0.900 0.800 BC-23-7 0.167 0.000 0.000 0.167 0.167 BC-23-4 0.200 0.000 0.000 0.100 0.100 BC-23-2 0.333 0.000 0.000 0.714 0.667 BC-23-3 0.700 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.700

WA Blackberry Botrytis - Fungicide Sensitivity Fenhexamid Boscalid Cyprodinil 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 Field 4 Field 3 Field 5 Field 6 Field 2 Field 1 Field 4 Field 3 Field 5 Field 6 Field 2 Field 1 Field 1 Field 2 Field 6 Field 5 Field 3 Field 4 Skagit Whatcom

Repeated Sampling of Cane Isolates from Single Raspberry Field Proportion Insensitive Isolates Year Fenhexamid Fludioxonil Iprodione Boscalid Cyprodinil 2014 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.10 2015 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.77