NEW MEXICO PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Carlsbad Municipal Schools District Report Card for School Year

Similar documents
Grandview Elementary School

Iola Roberts Elementary School

Opelika City. Superintendent Dr. Mark D. Neighbors

Attalla City. Superintendent Mr. Danny L. Golden

Principal Mr. L E. Franks. Superintendent Mrs. Kathi L. Wallace

Principal Mr. James K. Pharr. Superintendent Mr. Bill Moss

Principal Ms. Frances Shipp. Superintendent Dr. Judy Stiefel

Calhoun County. Superintendent Dr. Judy Stiefel

Greenwood Elementary School

Get Schools Cooking Application

REVISED 04/10/2018 Page 1 of 7 FOOD ALLERGY MANAGEMENT PLAN

Leander ISD Food Allergy Management Plan (FAMP)

Fiscal Management, Associated Student Body

Academic Year 2014/2015 Assessment Report. Bachelor of Science in Viticulture, Department of Viticulture and Enology

WACS culinary certification scheme

SYLLABUS. Departmental Syllabus. Food Production II CULN0140. Departmental Syllabus. Departmental Syllabus. Departmental Syllabus

THE DORCHESTER JOB DESCRIPTION. DEPARTMENT: Event Operations F&B JOB GRADE: Supervisory

Unit ID: 295 Domain FOOD AND BEVERAGE SERVICE Title: Serve food and beverages to guests in a hospitality establishment Level: 3 Credits: 10

SYLLABUS. Departmental Syllabus. Food Production I CULN0130. Departmental Syllabus. Departmental Syllabus. Departmental Syllabus

POSITION DESCRIPTION. DATE OF VERSION: August Position Summary:

COURT OF MASTER SOMMELIERS OCEANIA

Understanding Anaphylaxis in Schools

Dubuque Community Schools District. Peanut/Tree Nut Allergy Protocol

2. What are the dates for the Afterschool Supper and Snack Program? The Supper and Snack Program will run from August 21, 2017 through June 6, 2018

2018 DCYF Summer Meal Program: Frequently Asked Questions for Potential Distribution Site

NSSE (National Survey of Student Engagement) Multi-Year Benchmark Report Combined Charts Samuel Ginn College of Engineering

SENIOR NUTRITION SERVICES WORKER

2. What are the dates for the Afterschool Meal Program? The Afterschool Meal Program will run from August 20, 2018 through June 4, 2019.

Is Fair Trade Fair? ARKANSAS C3 TEACHERS HUB. 9-12th Grade Economics Inquiry. Supporting Questions

Allergy Management Policy

Meets Professional Standards

JCAST. Department of Viticulture and Enology, B.S. in Viticulture

Medical Conditions Policy

Anaphylaxis Management in the School Setting

1) What proportion of the districts has written policies regarding vending or a la carte foods?

Child Nutrition Program participation: Special Provision operation: Areas of Review. Commendations

POSITION DESCRIPTION. DATE OF VERSION: January Position Summary:

COLLEGE EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION SURVEY RESULTS Gallaudet University - Fall Comparison to 4-year, Private not-for-profit Institutions

Rosemead School District Nutrition Services Department MEAL COUNTING & COLLECTION PROCEDURES

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE I. POLICY:

POLICY: ANAPHYLAXIS MANAGEMENT

Step 1: Prepare To Use the System

School Breakfast and Lunch Program Request for Proposal

The Black River Local Schools Food Allergy Policy

Fairtrade Policy. Version 2.0

CENTRAL OTAGO WINEGROWERS ASSOCIATION (INC.)

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS FISCAL NOTE. HOUSE BILL NO. 466 PRINTERS NO. 521 PRIME SPONSOR: Turzai

Food Allergy Community Needs Assessment INDIANAPOLIS, IN

Food Safety Inspections Oregon Administration Rules

Roaster/Production Operative. Coffee for The People by The Coffee People. Our Values: The Role:

Slide 1. Slide 2. A Closer Look At Crediting Milk. Why do we credit foods? Ensuring Meals Served To Students Are Reimbursable

Fairfield Public Schools Family Consumer Sciences Curriculum Food Service 30

Lithgow Produce Markets

MOVING TO AN EIGHT PERIOD DAY AT RHS. Frank Howlett Sean Siet

Fairtrade Designation Endorsement

Fairtrade Policy 2018

2014 High School Graduates Christian Academy of Madison

January/February 2019 Food Services Newsletter. What s on the Menu? HS Lunch Menu MS Lunch Menu Elementary Lunch Menu

Anaphylaxis Policy RATIONALE

Implement Summer Food Standards of Excellence in Your Community

CERTIFICATE PROGRAMS VITICULTURE AND WINERY TECHNOLOGY VWT 130 General Viticulture VWT 172 Laboratory Analysis

Hawk Happenings. September Succeed Every Day! Horizon Hawks

Barista/Café Assistant

Serve with us. Mariam USMC veteran, regional office coordinator

CAKE BAKING AND PRODUCTION(PSTR 1302) Credit: 3:2:4 Prerequisite/Co-requisite: CHEF 1305, RSTO 1301

The Australian example: Australian Wine Industry Code of Conduct Horticulture Code of Conduct

Ideas for group discussion / exercises - Section 3 Applying food hygiene principles to the coffee chain

VITICULTURE AND ENOLOGY

CRITERIA AND PROCEDURE

Haccp Manual For Institutional Food Service. Operations >>>CLICK HERE<<<

Auburn University at Montgomery

MODEL 504 PLAN A 504 PLAN MUST BE ADAPTED TO THE INDIVIDUAL NEEDS, ABILITIES, AND MEDICAL CONDITION OF EACH INDIVIDUAL CHILD.

COUNTY OF MONTEREY CONTRACTS/PURCHASING DIVISION

FOOD ALLERGY CANADA COMMUNITY EVENT PROPOSAL FORM

AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENT WASTE CASE STUDY Plate Waste Study. Funded by USDA SNAP-Ed, an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Slide 1. Slide 2. A Closer Look At Crediting Fruits. Why do we credit foods? Ensuring Meals Served To Students Are Reimbursable

Looking Long: Demographic Change, Economic Crisis, and the Prospects for Reducing Poverty. La Conyuntura vs. the Long-run

STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No th LEGISLATURE

Simplified Summer Feeding Program

Student Services. Policy. Food Allergy Management

How to Implement Summer Food Standards of Excellence in Your Community

Review & Technical Assistance Unit Training Series

United Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley Community Needs Update:

Re: LCBO Lightweight Glass Wine Standard Implementation Date

segregation and educational opportunity

Fair Trade C E R T I F I E D

Dining Your Way into Reading

PUBLIC HEALTH BRIEF 2011 UPDATE HEALTHIER CHOICES IN SCHOOL VENDING MACHINES: SURVEY RESULTS FROM MAHONING COUNTY SCHOOLS

Jennings Street School

VIN 147 Introduction to Fruit Wine Production

STANDARD ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE

UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH FAIRTRADE PLAN

Alamo Heights ISD Food Services. Student Health Advisory Council Meeting 11/3/2010

Please complete the following pages. Failure to do so will result in your application being rejected!

UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH SUSTAINABLE FOOD PLAN

Qualification Specification Highfield Level 2 Award in Food Allergen Awareness and Control in Catering (RQF)

Rosemead School District Nutrition Services Department MEAL COUNTING & COLLECTION PROCEDURES

RESEARCH UPDATE from Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute by Natalia Kolyesnikova, PhD Tim Dodd, PhD THANK YOU SPONSORS

Stranahan High School Cafeteria Study Evaluation Results

St. Agnes Catholic Primary School Highett Anaphylaxis Policy

Transcription:

NEW MEXICO PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Carlsbad Municipal Schools District Report Card for 2006-2007 School Year 2006-2007 Data Released by PED in April 2009 ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS SUMMARY CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL SCHOOLS AYP Rating: AYP Met Improvement Status: SI-2 Total Schools rated in district 14 100 Schools in School Improvement 1 7 Schools in Corrective Action 3 21 School in Restructuring 0 0 What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? AYP is the annual academic proficiency targets in reading and math that the state, school districts and schools must reach to be considered on track for 100% proficiency by school year 2013-14. AYP is part of state and federal statute. The Federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 says that each state shall establish a timeline for adequate yearly progress. The timeline shall ensure that no later than 12 years after the 2001-2002 school year all students in each group described in the law will meet or exceed the state s proficient level of academic achievement. New Mexico Statute Article 2C says, The state shall institute an adequate yearly progress program that measures public schools improvements What do schools have to do in order to meet AYP? Schools need to: a) Achieve a 95% participation rate on state assessments. b) Reach targets for proficiency or reduce non-proficiency. c) Reach targets for the attendance rate for elementary and middle schools and the graduation rate for high schools. Who has to meet AYP? The state, school districts, schools, and subgroups of 25 or more students within schools. The subgroups include Ethnicity/Race: Caucasian, African American, Asian/Pacific, Hispanic, American Indian/Alaskan Native; as well as Economically Disadvantaged (FRLPstudents eligible for the free or reduced lunch program), with Disabilities (SWD), and English Language Learners (ELL). This Report Includes: District Student Demographics No Child Left Behind District Summary No Child Left Behind Accountability by Subgroup 4 th and 8 th Grade NAEP Assessments 3 rd, 4 th, 5 th, 6 th, 7 th, 8 th, 9 th and 11 th Grade Assessments School Board Member Participation Data on District Expenditures Teacher Quality Data Parent Survey on the Quality of Education Attendance and Graduation Rates 2006-2007 STUDENT DEMOGRAPHICS* CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL SCHOOLS STATE WIDE Female 2,832 47.8 159,155 48.8 Male 3,092 52.2 167,000 51.2 Caucasian 2,774 46.8 99,600 30.5 African-American 94 1.6 8,523 2.6 Hispanic 2,958 49.9 178,091 54.6 Asian/Pacific Islander 45 0.8 4,246 1.3 American Indian 53 0.9 35,679 10.9 English Language Learners 242 4.1 60,832 18.7 with Disabilities 1021 17.2 48,634 14.9 Free/Reduced Lunch Program 3,516 59.4 193,840 59.4 Migrant 0 0 796 0.2 *Source: STARS 120th day submission to Public Education Department Dear Parents,, Employees, and Community Leaders, MESSAGE FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT The School District Report Card presents information on the district s progress in meeting state accountability requirements for the 2006-07 school year. Results for 2008-09 will be reported following release by the Public Education Department. Additional copies may be secured at each school site or at the District Office, 408 North Canyon. This report along with back issues can also be accessed on the district web site at www.carlsbad.k12.nm.us. The district s annual accountability report measures the performance of every school in the district on several indicators including AYP ratings, proficiency statistics for all students, teacher qualifications, district expenditures, and the parent survey on quality of education. While each of these data points contributes to a holistic view of district progress, the district uses the data as part of a larger body of evidence in measuring school performance. In addition to the AYP data, schools track progress and develop action plans on four essential restructuring areas. District progress on the restructuring areas is reported periodically at public meetings of the Carlsbad Board of Education. Highlights include: (1) CMS is making improvements in teacher effectiveness and in the equitable distribution of qualified teachers for all students, particularly students who are most in need. Actions include setting high expectations for teaching and learning in the core content areas of literacy and mathematics; assuring that all teachers are highly qualified in the areas in which they are teaching; and improving the teacher evaluation process using walkthroughs, informal & formal observations, frequent progress checks and quarterly coaching. (2) CMS is making progress in establishing pre-k-to-college-and-career data systems that track progress and foster continuous improvement. Actions include using data to measure and make improvement; collecting information on the percentage of students who require remediation in the first two years of college/university study; and surveying students with disabilities who have an IEP in place upon graduation. Carlsbad Municipal Schools District Report Card 2006-2007

MESSAGE FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT (continued) (3) CMS is making progress toward rigorous college- and career-ready standards and high-quality assessments that are valid and reliable for all students, including limited English proficient students and students with disabilities. Actions include design of a guaranteed and viable curriculum that is effectively sequenced and paced with challenging goals and effective feedback; administering a workforce assessment for career readiness; identifying college readiness using the PSAT test administered in 10 th grade; providing appropriate assessments for all students including special subpopulations of students; taking a stand to increase regular attendance and graduation rate through Truancy Court and community partnerships; and helping students take the right high school courses to prepare for high school, post secondary studies, and careers. (4) CMS is making progress in providing targeted, intensive support and effective interventions at all schools. Actions include differentiated professional development for building staff that is aligned to school and district plans; providing targeted support to students in need of intervention; and providing interventions for students in need of targeted assistance. (5) CMS is making progress in overcoming barriers that impede access to, or participation in, educational programs. Actions include ensuring that time, people and financial resources are equitably determined by student learning needs so that all students are afforded access to program participation; aligning resources to educational priorities including a safe, healthy, well maintained and positive school environment; and collaborating with Parent Advisory Committees at the school and district level in a review of student progress and resources needed to bring more students to proficiency. Sincerely, Sheri S. Williams, Ed.D., Superintendent 2009-2010 EDUCATION PLAN FOR STUDENT SUCCESS (EPSS) Reading Goal The percentage of students proficient or above will meet or exceed the Annual Measurable Objective (AMO) for 2009-2010 on the New Mexico Standards Based Assessment as follows: Grades K-5 = 67%; Grades 6-8 = 61.0% and Grades 9-12 = 64.0%. Mathematics Goal The percentage of students proficient or above will meet or exceed the Annual Measurable Objective (AMO) for 2009-2010 on the New Mexico Standards Based Assessment as follows: Grades K-5 = 57.0%; Grades 6-8 = 48.00%; and Grades 9-12 = 53.0%. All Levels: Parental Involvement Goal A 90% overall parental participation rate for all students as measured in each of the following categories: student reading contracts/title I compacts, quality of education surveys, student progress reports/report cards, Parent/Student/Teacher conferences, and sponsored educational activities from August 2009 through May 2010. Long Term: 90% of parents will state that their child is safe at school as measured by parent satisfaction on the Quality Education Survey Report by May 2014. Short Term: Incremental increases toward the 90% long term goal each year (5% per year). ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS 2007-08 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY DATA School Name School AYP Rating Improvement Status School Name School AYP Rating Improvement Status Alta Vista Middle School AYP Met CA Carlsbad High School AYP Met CA Craft Elementary Meets AYP Progressing Dr. E.M. Smith Elementary Meets AYP Progressing ECE Center AYP Met Progressing Eddy Elementary AYP Met Progressing Hillcrest Elementary Meets AYP Progressing Joe Stanley Smith Elementary Meets AYP Progressing Monterrey Elementary AYP Met Progressing P.R. Leyva Middle School AYP Met CA Pate Elementary Meets AYP SI-1 delay Puckett Elementary Meets AYP Progressing Riverside Elementary Meets AYP Progressing Sunset Elementary Meets AYP Progressing Carlsbad Municipal Schools 2 District Report Card 2006-2007

NCLB ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) BY SUBGROUP (Reading and Math Proficiency, Attendance Rates, and Graduation Rates) AYP data sources are based on students who have attended a school for a full academic year. In addition to reading and math scores, a third academic indicator is required. For elementary and middle schools, it is attendance rate, while graduation rate is used to rate high schools. Results are not reported for subgroups with fewer than 10 students and are indicated by ***. School Name Academic Indicator PERCENT OF STUDENTS PROFICIENT OR ABOVE NCLB Goal ALL Caucasian African American Hispanic Asian/ Pacific American Indian/ Alaskan- Native FRLP ELL SWD District Wide-Grades 3-5 Reading Proficiency 49 62.0 68.7 60.0 56.7 *** 25.0 55.6 37.9 22.0 District Wide-Grades 6-8 Reading Proficiency 42 45.8 51.9 26.7 40.3 *** *** 36.5 *** 9.4 District Wide-Grades 9, 11 Reading Proficiency 45 46.3 59.0 40.0 33.7 *** *** 34.8 *** 6.6 Alta Vista Middle School Reading Proficiency 42 36.2 34.2 *** 37.2 *** *** 32.7 *** 12.2 Carlsbad High School Reading Proficiency 45 46.8 59.4 40.0 34.2 *** *** 35.4 *** 10.3 Craft Elementary Reading Proficiency 49 53.8 48.0 *** 57.7 *** *** 49.3 40.7 *** Dr. E.M. Smith Elementary Reading Proficiency 49 56.4 52.6 *** 57.1 *** *** 58.5 *** 36.4 ECE Center Reading Proficiency 49 55.7 62.4 *** 51.0 *** *** 51.2 38.1 14.3 Eddy Elementary Reading Proficiency 49 45.0 43.5 *** 46.4 *** *** 48.4 29.4 13.6 Hillcrest Elementary Reading Proficiency 49 46.3 46.4 *** 45.5 *** *** 43.9 *** <1.0 Joe Stanley Smith Elementary Reading Proficiency 49 66.9 71.4 *** 63.9 *** *** 65.9 *** 37.5 Monterrey Elementary Reading Proficiency 49 62.4 63.5 *** 62.0 *** *** 56.3 *** 23.1 P.R. Leyva Middle School Reading Proficiency 42 54.2 59.4 *** 46.3 *** *** 43.1 *** 17.1 Pate Elementary Reading Proficiency 49 64.8 80.0 *** 58.0 *** *** 58.4 53.3 36.4 Puckett Elementary Reading Proficiency 49 55.2 62.1 *** 53.1 *** *** 53.9 *** 12.5 Riverside Elementary Reading Proficiency 49 82.7 85.4 *** 78.1 *** *** 75.7 *** *** Sunset Elementary Reading Proficiency 49 69.4 75.9 *** 59.7 *** *** 64.5 *** 40.0 District Wide-Grades 3-5 Math Proficiency 33 51.4 59.6 33.3 44.8 *** 33.3 44.5 33.0 27.2 District Wide-Grades 6-8 Math Proficiency 20 31.6 37.6 33.3 25.6 *** *** 23.2 *** 3.1 District Wide-Grade 9, 11 Math Proficiency 27 38.3 49.7 20.0 27.0 *** *** 25.4 *** <1.0 Alta Vista Middle Math Proficiency 20 26.9 27.7 *** 26.4 *** *** 22.5 *** 7.5 Carlsbad High Math Proficiency 27 38.7 49.6 20.0 27.6 *** *** 26.0 *** 1.9 Craft Elementary Math Proficiency 33 45.0 44.0 *** 48.1 *** *** 40.6 33.3 *** Dr. E.M. Smith Elementary Math Proficiency 33 50.9 52.6 *** 48.6 *** *** 53.7 *** 36.4 ECE Center Math Proficiency 33 47.4 51.8 *** 44.5 *** *** 42.2 38.1 28.6 Eddy Elementary Math Proficiency 33 41.3 39.1 *** 42.9 *** *** 43.8 29.4 36.4 Hillcrest Elementary Math Proficiency 33 41.1 46.4 *** 39.4 *** *** 39.0 *** 18.8 Joe Stanley Smith Elementary Math Proficiency 33 46.0 48.6 *** 43.4 *** *** 40.7 *** 31.3 Monterrey Elementary Math Proficiency 33 51.3 55.6 *** 48.0 *** *** 42.2 *** 23.1 P.R. Leyva Middle Math Proficiency 20 37.0 42.5 *** 27.6 *** *** 26.8 *** 6.8 Pate Elementary Math Proficiency 33 56.5 71.4 *** 49.3 *** *** 50.7 46.7 40.9 Puckett Elementary Math Proficiency 33 42.7 55.2 *** 37.5 *** *** 38.5 *** 12.5 Riverside Elementary Math Proficiency 33 71.9 74.8 *** 65.6 *** *** 64.9 *** *** Sunset Elementary Math Proficiency 33 58.4 65.7 *** 46.8 *** *** 53.8 *** 33.3 All -Grade 3-5 Attendance Rate 92 96.1 96.2 95.8 96.0 *** 96.6 95.7 95.9 95.6 All -Grades 6-8 Attendance Rate 92 96.0 96.1 95.5 96.0 *** *** 95.8 *** 95.7 Alta Vista Middle Attendance Rate 92 95.8 95.6 *** 95.9 *** *** 95.7 *** 95.8 Craft Elementary Attendance Rate 92 96.1 96.1 *** 96.0 *** *** 95.8 95.8 *** Dr. E.M. Smith Elementary Attendance Rate 92 96.1 96.1 *** 96.0 *** *** 95.9 *** 96.0 Eddy Elementary Attendance Rate 92 95.8 96.0 *** 95.7 *** *** 95.5 95.4 95.2 Hillcrest Elementary Attendance Rate 92 95.1 95.5 *** 94.9 *** *** 95.1 *** 95.2 Joe Stanley Smith Elementary Attendance Rate 92 95.9 95.8 *** 95.9 *** *** 95.8 *** 96.3 Monterrey Elementary Attendance Rate 92 95.9 96.0 *** 95.7 *** *** 95.4 *** 95.9 P.R. Leyva Middle Attendance Rate 92 96.2 96.3 *** 96.1 *** *** 95.9 *** 95.6 Pate Elementary Attendance Rate 92 95.6 95.0 *** 95.7 *** *** 95.3 96.9 95.1 Puckett Elementary Attendance Rate 92 95.6 95.6 *** 95.6 *** *** 95.3 *** 96.1 Riverside Elementary Attendance Rate 92 97.2 97.1 *** 97.3 *** *** 96.6 *** *** Sunset Elementary Attendance Rate 92 96.8 96.9 *** 96.6 *** *** 96.8 *** 96.6 All in Grades 9 &11 Graduation Rate 90 91.2 95.3 100.0 86.7 *** *** 91.9 *** 100.0 Carlsbad High Graduation Rate 90 92.3 95.5 100.0 88.5 *** *** 93.2 *** 100.0 Carlsbad Municipal Schools 3 District Report Card 2006-2007

Teacher Quality Data* of Teachers Teaching with Emergency or Provisional Credentials: STATE WIDE 0.34% DISTRICT: 0.24% Emergency or Provisional Credentials Core Classes not taught by Highly Qualified Teachers of Teachers High Poverty Schools 0.72% 7.8% of Teachers Low Poverty Schools 0.15% 11.0% of Teachers of teachers where highest degree reported is a Bachelor's of teachers where highest of core academic classes not taught degree reported is a Master's or higher by Highly Qualified Teachers* STATE WIDE 26,477 55.3% 41.6% 5.9% District Wide 423 18.4 80.1 2.2 Alta Vista Middle 43 32.6 67.4 0.8 Carlsbad District Office 8 25.0 25.0 *** Carlsbad High 101 14.9 83.2 4.6 Craft Elementary 19 15.8 84.2 0.0 Dr. E.M.Smith Elementary 10 10.0 90.0 0.0 ECE Center 38 10.5 89.5 2.9 Eddy Elementary 17 17.6 82.4 0.0 Grace House Program RTC 1 0.0 100.0 *** Hillcrest Elementary 21 14.3 85.7 0.0 Joe Stanley Smith Elementary 21 23.8 76.2 0.0 Monterrey Elementary 21 9.5 90.5 0.0 P.R.Leyva Middle 51 23.5 76.5 0.0 Pate Elementary 14 14.3 85.7 0.0 Puckett Elementary 17 17.6 82.4 0.0 Riverside Elementary 19 31.6 68.4 0.0 Sunset Elementary 22 13.6 86.4 0.0 *See explanation of data source on page 14. *** = missing or not available e: Difference in teacher totals and school totals may occur because of district assignments. School Board Member Participation* In order to meet the law, Board members must have accumulated five points during the year by attending specific training. Board Member of Points Campos, Angela 19 Clark, Noel 5 Dorado, Martin 16 McInroy, Bill 15 Wellman, Jo Pat 4 Source: 2006-07 New Mexico School Board Association annual report. *In addition to the training required by the NM State Board Association, many school board members attend additional training. The information provided here does not reflect other training that school board members have received. Data on School Expenditures Includes state general fund operational monies only for 2006-2007 Expenditure Direct Instruction 27,613,095 63 Instructional Support Services 16,294,779 37 3,637,904 22 Instruction 1,243,138 8 General Administration 669,950 4 School Administration 3,505,267 22 Central Services 1,224,234 8 Ooperations & Maintenance 6,014,286 37 Student Transportation 0 0 Non-Instructional Support 35,394 <1 Food Services 0 0 Communication Services 35,394 100 Capital Outlay 21,340 <1 Total Expenditures 43,964,608 Source: End of year school-reported expenditures to NM Public Education Department School Budget office. Carlsbad Municipal Schools 4 District Report Card 2006-2007

State Assessment Results for District (excluding charter schools) in New Mexico schools are assessed in Reading and Mathematics in the 3 rd through 9 th and 11 th grade by the Standards Based Assessment (SBA) and the NM Alternative Proficiency Assessment (NMAPA) for with Disabilities. These assessments were developed to measure the NM Standards and Benchmarks that educators and the public determined are important for all students to know and be able to do. The assessment results reported are for ALL students enrolled and participating in the testing during the 2006-07 school year. The assessments were administered during March 2007. Results for groups of fewer than 10 students are not reported and are indicated by ***. s may not add to 100, due to rounding. 3rd Grade READING MATHEMATICS at Each Proficiency Level at Each Proficiency Level Reporting Group Nearing Proficiency Nearing Proficiency Female 100 221 3 58 31 8 0 100 221 3 43 50 4 0 Male 100 244 4 49 35 13 0 100 244 5 47 44 5 0 Caucasian 100 209 5 59 27 8 0 100 209 7 47 42 4 0 African-American *** 8 *** *** *** *** *** *** 8 *** *** *** *** *** Hispanic 100 238 2 48 37 13 0 100 238 2 43 50 5 0 Asian/Pacific *** 4 *** *** *** *** *** *** 4 *** *** *** *** *** American Indian 1 *** 6 *** *** *** *** *** *** 6 *** *** *** *** *** SWD 2 100 61 2 16 48 34 0 100 61 3 30 54 13 0 ELL 3 100 47 2 34 47 17 0 100 47 0 43 49 9 0 FRLP 100 333 1 50 36 13 0 100 333 2 42 51 5 0 Migrant *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** All 2006-07 100 465 3 53 33 10 0 100 465 4 45 47 4 0 All 2005-06 100 438 8 64 21 7 0 100 436 6 51 41 1 0 NM2006-07 99 24,323 6 49 30 16 0 99 24,329 5 39 49 8 0 NM2005-06 99 24,090 6 48 30 15 0 99 24,105 4 41 47 8 0 1 includes Alaskan Natives 2 SWD with Disabilities 3 ELL English Language Learners 4th Grade READING MATHEMATICS Reporting Group at Each Proficiency Level Nearing Proficiency at Each Proficiency Level Nearing Proficiency Female 100 202 19 50 25 5 0 100 202 14 45 39 3 0 Male 100 238 10 51 31 8 0 100 238 15 49 34 1 0 Caucasian 100 215 19 53 23 5 0 100 215 22 49 28 1 0 African-American *** 8 *** *** *** *** *** *** 8 *** *** *** *** *** Hispanic 100 213 10 48 33 8 0 100 213 8 45 44 3 0 Asian/Pacific *** 3 *** *** *** *** *** *** 3 *** *** *** *** *** American Indian 1 *** 1 *** *** *** *** *** *** 1 *** *** *** *** *** SWD 2 100 61 2 23 46 30 0 100 61 8 26 54 11 0 ELL 3 100 42 7 31 48 14 0 100 42 0 33 64 2 0 FRLP 100 275 9 48 35 8 0 100 275 8 44 45 3 0 Migrant *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** All 2006-07 100 440 14 51 28 6 0 100 440 15 47 36 2 0 All 2005-06 100 396 14 54 27 6 0 100 398 15 44 36 5 0 NM2006-07 99 24,231 10 44 33 12 0 99 24,237 11 35 45 9 0 NM2005-06 99 23,816 11 43 35 11 0 99 23,833 9 33 48 10 0 1 includes Alaskan Natives 2 SWD with Disabilities 3 ELL English Language Learners Carlsbad Municipal Schools 5 District Report Card 2006-2007

State Assessment Results for District (excluding charter schools) in New Mexico schools are assessed in Reading and Mathematics in the 3 rd through 9 th and 11 th grade by the Standards Based Assessment (SBA) and the NM Alternative Proficiency Assessment (NMAPA) for with Disabilities. These assessments were developed to measure the NM Standards and Benchmarks that educators and the public determined are important for all students to know and be able to do. The assessment results reported are for ALL students enrolled and participating in the testing during the 2006-07 school year. The assessments were administered during March 2007. Results for groups of fewer than 10 students are not reported and are indicated by ***. s may not add to 100, due to rounding. 5th Grade READING MATHEMATICS at Each Proficiency Level at Each Proficiency Level Reporting Group Female 100 199 20 53 21 7 0 100 199 7 39 48 6 0 Male 100 207 10 46 32 12 0 100 207 7 36 49 8 0 Caucasian 100 182 20 49 25 5 0 100 182 8 45 42 5 0 African-American *** 4 *** *** *** *** *** *** 4 *** *** *** *** *** Hispanic 100 210 10 50 27 13 0 100 210 5 32 54 9 0 Asian/Pacific *** 3 *** *** *** *** *** *** 3 *** *** *** *** *** American Indian 1 *** 7 *** *** *** *** *** *** 7 *** *** *** *** *** SWD 2 100 76 1 21 34 43 0 100 76 3 13 58 26 0 ELL 3 100 29 3 41 34 21 0 100 29 3 28 52 17 0 FRLP 100 265 11 46 30 12 0 100 265 4 34 54 8 0 Migrant *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** All 2006-07 100 406 15 49 27 9 0 100 406 7 37 49 7 0 All 2005-06 100 486 20 49 25 6 0 100 486 6 36 48 10 0 NM2006-07 99 23,998 14 45 32 9 0 99 24,013 7 29 51 12 0 NM2005-06 99 24,194 15 43 33 9 0 99 24,199 6 28 50 15 0 1 includes Alaskan Natives 2 SWD with Disabilities 3 ELL English Language Learners 6th Grade READING MATHEMATICS at Each Proficiency Level at Each Proficiency Level Reporting Group Female 100 237 7 34 46 13 0 100 237 5 24 54 16 0 Male 100 248 2 28 48 22 0 100 248 4 32 45 19 0 Caucasian 100 228 4 36 43 18 0 100 228 7 32 46 15 0 African-American *** 8 *** *** *** *** *** *** 8 *** *** *** *** *** Hispanic 100 244 5 28 50 17 0 100 244 2 26 54 19 0 Asian/Pacific *** 5 *** *** *** *** *** *** 5 *** *** *** *** *** American Indian 1 *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** SWD 2 100 88 3 5 31 61 0 100 88 0 3 33 64 0 ELL 3 *** 1 *** *** *** *** *** *** 1 *** *** *** *** *** FRLP 100 310 2 26 49 23 0 100 310 1 24 53 22 0 Migrant *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** All 2006-07 100 485 5 31 47 18 0 100 485 5 28 49 18 0 All 2005-06 100 492 8 41 45 7 0 100 492 7 28 49 16 0 NM2006-07 99 24,110 5 33 48 15 0 99 24,119 5 22 52 21 0 NM2005-06 99 24,598 5 36 49 11 0 97 24,608 4 20 51 23 3 1 includes Alaskan Natives 2 SWD with Disabilities 3 ELL English Language Learners Carlsbad Municipal Schools 6 District Report Card 2006-2007

State Assessment Results for District (excluding charter schools) in New Mexico schools are assessed in Reading and Mathematics in the 3 rd through 9 th and 11 th grade by the Standards Based Assessment (SBA) and the NM Alternative Proficiency Assessment (NMAPA) for with Disabilities. These assessments were developed to measure the NM Standards and Benchmarks that educators and the public determined are important for all students to know and be able to do. The assessment results reported are for ALL students enrolled and participating in the testing during the 2006-07 school year. The assessments were administered during March 2007. Results for groups of fewer than 10 students are not reported and are indicated by ***. s may not add to 100, due to rounding. 7th Grade READING MATHEMATICS at Each Proficiency Level at Each Proficiency Level Reporting Group Female 100 237 9 46 37 7 0 100 237 3 29 48 20 0 Male 100 260 8 43 36 12 0 99 260 5 28 49 18 1 Caucasian 100 227 12 47 33 7 0 100 227 6 29 49 15 0 African-American *** 8 *** *** *** *** *** *** 8 *** *** *** *** *** Hispanic 99 257 5 42 39 12 1 100 257 2 27 49 21 0 Asian/Pacific *** 4 *** *** *** *** *** *** 4 *** *** *** *** *** American Indian 1 *** 1 *** *** *** *** *** *** 1 *** *** *** *** *** SWD 2 100 76 4 7 45 45 0 100 76 1 5 34 59 0 ELL 3 *** 3 *** *** *** *** *** *** 3 *** *** *** *** *** FRLP 99 298 4 42 40 14 1 99 298 2 23 50 24 1 Migrant *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** All 2006-07 100 497 9 45 36 10 0 100 497 4 28 48 19 0 All 2005-06 100 425 4 51 37 8 0 100 425 3 24 49 24 0 NM2006-07 99 24,666 8 42 39 10 1 99 24,663 5 20 49 25 1 NM2005-06 99 25,165 6 45 39 11 1 99 25,180 3 20 47 27 3 1 includes Alaskan Natives 2 SWD with Disabilities 3 ELL English Language Learners 8th Grade READING MATHEMATICS at Each Proficiency Level at Each Proficiency Level Reporting Group Female 100 207 1 54 36 9 0 99 207 2 31 50 16 1 Male 100 207 2 43 42 13 0 100 207 3 25 56 16 0 Caucasian 100 198 2 53 36 10 0 99 198 3 32 54 11 1 African-American *** 4 *** *** *** *** *** *** 4 *** *** *** *** *** Hispanic 100 209 2 44 41 12 0 99 209 3 23 52 21 1 Asian/Pacific *** 2 *** *** *** *** *** *** 2 *** *** *** *** *** American Indian 1 *** 1 *** *** *** *** *** *** 1 *** *** *** *** *** SWD 2 98 56 5 20 38 36 2 98 56 5 5 39 48 2 ELL 3 *** 4 *** *** *** *** *** *** 4 *** *** *** *** *** FRLP 100 236 1 40 44 14 0 99 236 1 22 54 22 1 Migrant *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** All 2006-07 100 415 2 48 39 11 0 99 415 3 28 53 16 1 All 2005-06 100 439 3 51 38 8 0 100 437 4 22 53 20 0 NM2006-07 99 25,103 3 53 34 10 1 99 25,102 5 25 50 19 1 NM2005-06 99 25,652 3 48 38 10 1 98 25,659 4 22 48 24 2 1 includes Alaskan Natives 2 SWD with Disabilities 3 ELL English Language Learners Carlsbad Municipal Schools 7 District Report Card 2006-2007

State Assessment Results for District (excluding charter schools) in New Mexico schools are assessed in Reading and Mathematics in the 3 rd through 9 th and 11 th grade by the Standards Based Assessment (SBA) and the NM Alternative Proficiency Assessment (NMAPA) for with Disabilities. These assessments were developed to measure the NM Standards and Benchmarks that educators and the public determined are important for all students to know and be able to do. The assessment results reported are for ALL students enrolled and participating in the testing during the 2006-07 school year. The assessments were administered during March 2007. Results for groups of fewer than 10 students are not reported and are indicated by ***. s may not add to 100, due to rounding. 9th Grade READING MATHEMATICS at Each Proficiency Level at Each Proficiency Level Reporting Group Female 100 214 1 51 27 20 0 100 214 7 35 47 11 0 Male 100 235 2 31 37 29 0 99 235 8 25 56 10 1 Caucasian 100 218 2 50 29 18 0 100 218 11 36 46 7 0 African-American *** 8 *** *** *** *** *** *** 8 *** *** *** *** *** Hispanic 99 218 1 31 37 30 1 98 218 4 25 58 12 2 Asian/Pacific *** 2 *** *** *** *** *** *** 2 *** *** *** *** *** American Indian 1 *** 3 *** *** *** *** *** *** 3 *** *** *** *** *** SWD 2 97 67 4 3 19 70 3 96 67 1 1 60 33 4 ELL 3 *** 2 *** *** *** *** *** *** 2 *** *** *** *** *** FRLP 99 218 1 30 36 32 1 98 218 5 20 59 14 2 Migrant *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** All 2006-07 100 449 2 41 33 25 0 99 449 8 30 52 10 1 All 2005-06 99 566 1 50 24 23 1 99 566 6 31 43 19 1 NM2006-07 98 27,588 2 42 29 25 2 98 27,594 7 30 48 13 3 NM2005-06 97 28,060 1 42 29 25 3 98 28,040 5 28 48 17 2 1 includes Alaskan Natives 2 SWD with Disabilities 3 ELL English Language Learners 11th Grade READING MATHEMATICS at Each Proficiency Level at Each Proficiency Level Reporting Group Female 98 197 10 41 35 13 2 97 198 9 26 45 17 3 Male 99 209 8 37 37 17 1 99 209 9 27 39 24 1 Caucasian 99 197 14 46 30 9 1 98 198 16 30 39 14 2 African-American 100 13 8 38 38 15 0 100 13 8 15 46 31 0 Hispanic 97 182 3 31 42 21 3 97 182 1 22 46 28 3 Asian/Pacific *** 6 *** *** *** *** *** *** 6 *** *** *** *** *** American Indian 1 *** 8 *** *** *** *** *** *** 8 *** *** *** *** *** SWD 2 93 67 1 9 31 51 7 91 67 0 0 25 66 9 ELL 3 *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** FRLP 98 183 2 36 37 23 2 98 183 1 21 45 30 2 Migrant *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** *** 0 *** *** *** *** *** All 2006-07 98 406 9 39 36 15 2 98 407 9 27 42 21 2 All 2005-06 100 320 18 54 22 5 0 100 320 10 29 43 18 0 NM2006-07 98 19,936 7 41 36 15 2 97 19,939 7 25 44 22 3 NM2005-06 98 20,449 13 45 28 13 2 98 20,470 7 24 46 21 5 1 includes Alaskan Natives 2 SWD with Disabilities 3 ELL English Language Learners Carlsbad Municipal Schools 8 District Report Card 2006-2007

Parent Survey on the Quality of Education (Spring 2007) The Quality of Education Survey is provided to all parents statewide yearly by regulation. It consists of ten required questions by the NM Public Education Department. Q1. My child is safe at school. Q2. My child s school building is in good repair and has sufficient space to support quality education. Q3. My child s school holds high expectations for academic achievement. Q4. School personnel encourage me to participate in my child s education. Q5. The school offers adequate access to up-to-date computers and technologies. Q6. School staff maintains consistent discipline, which is conducive to learning. Q7. My child has an adequate choice of school-sponsored extracurricular activities. Q8. My child s teacher provides sufficient and appropriate information regarding my child s academic progress. Q9. The school staff employs various instructional methods and strategies to meet my child s needs. Q10. My child takes responsibility for his or her learning. # = % = *** = indicates no data Q#=Question SA=Strongly Agree A=Agree D=Disagree SD=Strongly Disagree K=Do not know O=No Opinion Q# #SA #A #D #SD #K #0 %SA %A %D %SD %K %O State Wide Totals 1 23,924 48,228 5258 1878 4484 4384 27.1 54.7 6.0 2.1 5.1 5.0 State Wide Totals 2 21,724 45,468 9448 3634 3769 4113 24.6 51.6 10.7 4.1 4.3 4.7 State Wide Totals 3 27,778 46,298 4966 1536 3079 4499 31.5 52.5 5.6 1.7 3.5 5.1 State Wide Totals 4 27,277 44,349 7468 2342 2266 4454 30.9 50.3 8.5 2.7 2.6 5.1 State Wide Totals 5 21,917 43,974 5864 2010 9868 4523 24.9 49.9 6.7 2.3 11.2 5.1 State Wide Totals 6 22,892 46,794 6657 2672 4727 4414 26.0 53.1 7.6 3.0 5.4 5.0 State Wide Totals 7 17,866 41,231 11719 4136 7591 5613 20.3 46.8 13.3 4.7 8.6 6.4 State Wide Totals 8 35,060 40,813 5164 1860 1378 3881 39.8 46.3 5.9 2.1 1.6 4.4 State Wide Totals 9 23,318 46,242 5727 1787 6090 4992 26.5 52.5 6.5 2.0 6.9 5.7 State Wide Totals 10 29,645 45,292 5839 1496 1389 4495 33.6 51.4 6.6 1.7 1.6 5.1 District Wide Totals 1 796 1769 140 36 148 113 26.5 58.9 4.7 1.2 4.9 3.8 District Wide Totals 2 764 1789 214 42 144 49 25.4 59.6 7.1 1.4 4.8 1.6 District Wide Totals 3 984 1742 124 28 86 38 32.8 58.0 4.1 0.9 2.9 1.3 District Wide Totals 4 896 1640 259 55 55 97 29.8 54.6 8.6 1.8 1.8 3.2 District Wide Totals 5 786 1654 127 28 365 42 26.2 55.1 4.2 0.9 12.2 1.4 District Wide Totals 6 815 1723 191 60 160 53 27.1 57.4 6.4 2.0 5.3 1.8 District Wide Totals 7 623 1531 390 114 226 118 20.8 51.0 13.0 3.8 7.5 3.9 District Wide Totals 8 1189 1576 137 39 24 37 39.6 52.5 4.6 1.3 0.8 1.2 District Wide Totals 9 831 1748 145 38 181 59 27.7 58.2 4.8 1.3 6.0 2.0 District Wide Totals 10 990 1741 163 18 28 62 33.0 58.0 5.4 0.6 0.9 2.1 Alta Vista Middle 1 36 133 8 5 13 11 17.5 64.6 3.9 2.4 6.3 5.3 Alta Vista Middle 2 26 140 19 7 13 1 12.6 68.0 9.2 3.4 6.3 0.5 Alta Vista Middle 3 41 139 8 2 13 3 19.9 67.5 3.9 1.0 6.3 1.5 Alta Vista Middle 4 41 117 28 6 3 11 19.9 56.8 13.6 2.9 1.5 5.3 Alta Vista Middle 5 38 132 7 1 25 3 18.4 64.1 3.4 0.5 12.1 1.5 Alta Vista Middle 6 36 131 19 4 11 5 17.5 63.6 9.2 1.9 5.3 2.4 Alta Vista Middle 7 30 121 29 14 10 2 14.6 58.7 14.1 6.8 4.9 1.0 Alta Vista Middle 8 58 121 17 3 4 3 28.2 58.7 8.3 1.5 1.9 1.5 Alta Vista Middle 9 37 132 17 2 14 4 18.0 64.1 8.3 1.0 6.8 1.9 Alta Vista Middle 10 68 112 19 1 2 4 33.0 54.4 9.2 0.5 1.0 1.9 Carlsbad High 1 24 210 41 10 26 11 7.5 65.2 12.7 3.1 8.1 3.4 Carlsbad High 2 29 220 42 11 15 5 9.0 68.3 13.0 3.4 4.7 1.6 Carlsbad High 3 38 208 41 14 10 11 11.8 64.6 12.7 4.3 3.1 3.4 Carlsbad High 4 30 161 84 18 18 11 9.3 50.0 26.1 5.6 5.6 3.4 Carlsbad High 5 49 212 25 7 23 6 15.2 65.8 7.8 2.2 7.1 1.9 Carlsbad High 6 30 190 53 19 24 6 9.3 59.0 16.5 5.9 7.5 1.9 Carlsbad High 7 71 192 32 11 9 7 22.0 59.6 9.9 3.4 2.8 2.2 Carlsbad High 8 50 203 48 13 3 5 15.5 63.0 14.9 4.0 0.9 1.6 Carlsbad High 9 35 190 52 12 27 6 10.9 59.0 16.1 3.7 8.4 1.9 Carlsbad High 10 115 185 13 2 1 6 35.7 57.5 4.0 0.6 0.3 1.9 Carlsbad Municipal Schools 9 District Report Card 2006-2007

Parent Survey on the Quality of Education (Spring 2007) The Quality of Education Survey is provided to all parents statewide yearly by regulation. It consists of ten required questions by the NM Public Education Department. Q1. My child is safe at school. Q2. My child s school building is in good repair and has sufficient space to support quality education. Q3. My child s school holds high expectations for academic achievement. Q4. School personnel encourage me to participate in my child s education. Q5. The school offers adequate access to up-to-date computers and technologies. Q6. School staff maintains consistent discipline, which is conducive to learning. Q7. My child has an adequate choice of school-sponsored extracurricular activities. Q8. My child s teacher provides sufficient and appropriate information regarding my child s academic progress. Q9. The school staff employs various instructional methods and strategies to meet my child s needs. Q10. My child takes responsibility for his or her learning. # = % = *** = indicates no data Q#=Question SA=Strongly Agree A=Agree D=Disagree SD=Strongly Disagree K=Do not know O=No Opinion Q# #SA #A #D #SD #K #0 %SA %A %D %SD %K %O Craft Elementary 1 45 103 12 1 5 5 26.3 60.2 7.0 0.6 2.9 2.9 Craft Elementary 2 30 103 13 4 16 5 17.5 60.2 7.6 2.3 9.4 2.9 Craft Elementary 3 41 113 3 0 9 5 24.0 66.1 1.8 0.0 5.3 2.9 Craft Elementary 4 43 100 17 1 1 9 25.1 58.5 9.9 0.6 0.6 5.3 Craft Elementary 5 41 87 9 0 32 2 24.0 50.9 5.3 0.0 18.7 1.2 Craft Elementary 6 41 102 11 3 12 2 24.0 59.6 6.4 1.8 7.0 1.2 Craft Elementary 7 31 71 33 10 21 5 18.1 41.5 19.3 5.8 12.3 2.9 Craft Elementary 8 55 100 8 2 4 2 32.2 58.5 4.7 1.2 2.3 1.2 Craft Elementary 9 37 106 9 0 14 5 21.6 62.0 5.3 0.0 8.2 2.9 Craft Elementary 10 51 108 6 1 3 2 29.8 63.2 3.5 0.6 1.8 1.2 Dr.E.M.Smith Elem 1 16 51 2 1 2 4 21.1 67.1 2.6 1.3 2.6 5.3 Dr.E.M.Smith Elem 2 18 50 3 0 2 3 23.7 65.8 3.9 0.0 2.6 3.9 Dr.E.M.Smith Elem 3 25 47 1 0 2 1 32.9 61.8 1.3 0.0 2.6 1.3 Dr.E.M.Smith Elem 4 27 45 1 0 1 2 35.5 59.2 1.3 0.0 1.3 2.6 Dr.E.M.Smith Elem 5 22 42 2 0 7 3 28.9 55.3 2.6 0.0 9.2 3.9 Dr.E.M.Smith Elem 6 27 41 4 1 2 1 35.5 53.9 5.3 1.3 2.6 1.3 Dr.E.M.Smith Elem 7 14 40 5 5 7 5 18.4 52.6 6.6 6.6 9.2 6.6 Dr.E.M.Smith Elem 8 31 40 1 1 1 2 40.8 52.6 1.3 1.3 1.3 2.6 Dr.E.M.Smith Elem 9 23 43 1 1 4 4 30.3 56.6 1.3 1.3 5.3 5.3 Dr.E.M.Smith Elem 10 30 36 8 0 1 1 39.5 47.4 10.5 0.0 1.3 1.3 ECE Center 1 190 198 1 2 9 11 46.2 48.2 0.2 0.5 2.2 2.7 ECE Center 2 242 155 6 0 6 2 58.9 37.7 1.5 0.0 1.5 0.5 ECE Center 3 227 178 0 0 5 1 55.2 43.3 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.2 ECE Center 4 219 174 7 0 5 6 53.3 42.3 1.7 0.0 1.2 1.5 ECE Center 5 172 169 2 1 63 4 41.8 41.1 0.5 0.2 15.3 1.0 ECE Center 6 198 184 4 2 21 2 48.2 44.8 1.0 0.5 5.1 0.5 ECE Center 7 142 169 21 7 45 27 34.5 41.1 5.1 1.7 10.9 6.6 ECE Center 8 257 147 2 0 2 3 62.5 35.8 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.7 ECE Center 9 220 180 0 1 7 3 53.5 43.8 0.0 0.2 1.7 0.7 ECE Center 10 169 208 16 1 7 10 41.1 50.6 3.9 0.2 1.7 2.4 Eddy Elementary 1 46 88 3 4 9 5 29.7 56.8 1.9 2.6 5.8 3.2 Eddy Elementary 2 29 102 14 2 7 1 18.7 65.8 9.0 1.3 4.5 0.6 Eddy Elementary 3 46 89 11 2 5 2 29.7 57.4 7.1 1.3 3.2 1.3 Eddy Elementary 4 44 83 10 2 2 14 28.4 53.5 6.5 1.3 1.3 9.0 Eddy Elementary 5 37 99 2 1 12 4 23.9 63.9 1.3 0.6 7.7 2.6 Eddy Elementary 6 35 101 7 5 3 4 22.6 65.2 4.5 3.2 1.9 2.6 Eddy Elementary 7 26 73 24 10 7 15 16.8 47.1 15.5 6.5 4.5 9.7 Eddy Elementary 8 58 84 6 3 0 4 37.4 54.2 3.9 1.9 0.0 2.6 Eddy Elementary 9 36 95 5 1 11 7 23.2 61.3 3.2 0.6 7.1 4.5 Eddy Elementary 10 42 91 11 4 3 4 27.1 58.7 7.1 2.6 1.9 2.6 Carlsbad Municipal Schools 10 District Report Card 2006-2007

Parent Survey on the Quality of Education (Spring 2007) The Quality of Education Survey is provided to all parents statewide yearly by regulation. It consists of ten required questions by the NM Public Education Department. Q1. My child is safe at school. Q2. My child s school building is in good repair and has sufficient space to support quality education. Q3. My child s school holds high expectations for academic achievement. Q4. School personnel encourage me to participate in my child s education. Q5. The school offers adequate access to up-to-date computers and technologies. Q6. School staff maintains consistent discipline, which is conducive to learning. Q7. My child has an adequate choice of school-sponsored extracurricular activities. Q8. My child s teacher provides sufficient and appropriate information regarding my child s academic progress. Q9. The school staff employs various instructional methods and strategies to meet my child s needs. Q10. My child takes responsibility for his or her learning. # = % = *** = indicates no data Q#=Question SA=Strongly Agree A=Agree D=Disagree SD=Strongly Disagree K=Do not know O=No Opinion Q# #SA #A #D #SD #K #0 %SA %A %D %SD %K %O Hillcrest Elementary 1 50 121 10 0 6 6 25.9 62.7 5.2 0.0 3.1 3.1 Hillcrest Elementary 2 52 121 5 0 12 3 26.9 62.7 2.6 0.0 6.2 1.6 Hillcrest Elementary 3 51 113 10 4 11 4 26.4 58.5 5.2 2.1 5.7 2.1 Hillcrest Elementary 4 57 117 8 2 3 6 29.5 60.6 4.1 1.0 1.6 3.1 Hillcrest Elementary 5 48 108 5 0 27 5 24.9 56.0 2.6 0.0 14.0 2.6 Hillcrest Elementary 6 48 113 15 1 9 7 24.9 58.5 7.8 0.5 4.7 3.6 Hillcrest Elementary 7 31 100 26 6 21 9 16.1 51.8 13.5 3.1 10.9 4.7 Hillcrest Elementary 8 81 105 3 1 1 2 42.0 54.4 1.6 0.5 0.5 1.0 Hillcrest Elementary 9 52 115 3 2 15 6 26.9 59.6 1.6 1.0 7.8 3.1 Hillcrest Elementary 10 62 116 7 1 1 6 32.1 60.1 3.6 0.5 0.5 3.1 Joe Stanley Smith El 1 46 110 6 1 13 15 24.1 57.6 3.1 0.5 6.8 7.9 Joe Stanley Smith El 2 38 132 10 0 9 2 19.9 69.1 5.2 0.0 4.7 1.0 Joe Stanley Smith El 3 56 118 10 0 5 2 29.3 61.8 5.2 0.0 2.6 1.0 Joe Stanley Smith El 4 44 117 15 7 3 5 23.0 61.3 7.9 3.7 1.6 2.6 Joe Stanley Smith El 5 37 113 7 1 31 2 19.4 59.2 3.7 0.5 16.2 1.0 Joe Stanley Smith El 6 34 119 14 3 15 6 17.8 62.3 7.3 1.6 7.9 3.1 Joe Stanley Smith El 7 31 100 27 9 19 5 16.2 52.4 14.1 4.7 9.9 2.6 Joe Stanley Smith El 8 69 105 8 4 1 4 36.1 55.0 4.2 2.1 0.5 2.1 Joe Stanley Smith El 9 40 125 10 2 9 5 20.9 65.4 5.2 1.0 4.7 2.6 Joe Stanley Smith El 10 43 126 13 1 0 8 22.5 66.0 6.8 0.5 0.0 4.2 Monterrey Elementary 1 41 84 1 0 3 2 31.3 64.1 0.8 0.0 2.3 1.5 Monterrey Elementary 2 35 85 7 0 2 2 26.7 64.9 5.3 0.0 1.5 1.5 Monterrey Elementary 3 49 77 3 0 2 0 37.4 58.8 2.3 0.0 1.5 0.0 Monterrey Elementary 4 41 79 8 0 1 2 31.3 60.3 6.1 0.0 0.8 1.5 Monterrey Elementary 5 34 77 4 2 13 1 26.0 58.8 3.1 1.5 9.9 0.8 Monterrey Elementary 6 40 79 2 1 8 1 30.5 60.3 1.5 0.8 6.1 0.8 Monterrey Elementary 7 24 64 21 5 13 4 18.3 48.9 16.0 3.8 9.9 3.1 Monterrey Elementary 8 66 61 3 0 1 0 50.4 46.6 2.3 0.0 0.8 0.0 Monterrey Elementary 9 40 77 6 2 5 1 30.5 58.8 4.6 1.5 3.8 0.8 Monterrey Elementary 10 50 69 6 0 1 5 38.2 52.7 4.6 0.0 0.8 3.8 P.R.Leyva Middle 1 34 190 28 6 34 9 11.3 63.1 9.3 2.0 11.3 3.0 P.R.Leyva Middle 2 30 180 42 8 31 10 10.0 59.8 14.0 2.7 10.3 3.3 P.R.Leyva Middle 3 60 203 17 2 14 5 19.9 67.4 5.6 0.7 4.7 1.7 P.R.Leyva Middle 4 41 176 49 14 10 11 13.6 58.5 16.3 4.7 3.3 3.7 P.R.Leyva Middle 5 44 186 20 4 45 2 14.6 61.8 6.6 1.3 15.0 0.7 P.R.Leyva Middle 6 47 191 26 10 20 7 15.6 63.5 8.6 3.3 6.6 2.3 P.R.Leyva Middle 7 37 186 47 10 16 5 12.3 61.8 15.6 3.3 5.3 1.7 P.R.Leyva Middle 8 72 185 25 9 3 7 23.9 61.5 8.3 3.0 1.0 2.3 P.R.Leyva Middle 9 49 187 20 7 31 7 16.3 62.1 6.6 2.3 10.3 2.3 P.R.Leyva Middle 10 87 187 16 4 2 5 28.9 62.1 5.3 1.3 0.7 1.7 Carlsbad Municipal Schools 11 District Report Card 2006-2007

Parent Survey on the Quality of Education (Spring 2007) The Quality of Education Survey is provided to all parents statewide yearly by regulation. It consists of ten required questions by the NM Public Education Department. Q1. My child is safe at school. Q2. My child s school building is in good repair and has sufficient space to support quality education. Q3. My child s school holds high expectations for academic achievement. Q4. School personnel encourage me to participate in my child s education. Q5. The school offers adequate access to up-to-date computers and technologies. Q6. School staff maintains consistent discipline, which is conducive to learning. Q7. My child has an adequate choice of school-sponsored extracurricular activities. Q8. My child s teacher provides sufficient and appropriate information regarding my child s academic progress. Q9. The school staff employs various instructional methods and strategies to meet my child s needs. Q10. My child takes responsibility for his or her learning. # = % = *** = indicates no data Q#=Question SA=Strongly Agree A=Agree D=Disagree SD=Strongly Disagree K=Do not know O=No Opinion Q# #SA #A #D #SD #K #0 %SA %A %D %SD %K %O Pate Elementary 1 21 47 3 0 6 1 26.9 60.3 3.8 0.0 7.7 1.3 Pate Elementary 2 17 50 6 0 4 1 21.8 64.1 7.7 0.0 5.1 1.3 Pate Elementary 3 21 51 4 0 2 0 26.9 65.4 5.1 0.0 2.6 0.0 Pate Elementary 4 20 46 9 2 1 0 25.6 59.0 11.5 2.6 1.3 0.0 Pate Elementary 5 19 40 3 0 13 3 24.4 51.3 3.8 0.0 16.7 3.8 Pate Elementary 6 22 42 5 2 5 2 28.2 53.8 6.4 2.6 6.4 2.6 Pate Elementary 7 17 34 8 6 11 2 21.8 43.6 10.3 7.7 14.1 2.6 Pate Elementary 8 26 45 4 2 1 0 33.3 57.7 5.1 2.6 1.3 0.0 Pate Elementary 9 16 50 3 0 7 2 20.5 64.1 3.8 0.0 9.0 2.6 Pate Elementary 10 26 42 7 0 2 1 33.3 53.8 9.0 0.0 2.6 1.3 Puckett Elementary 1 57 102 2 5 7 9 31.3 56.0 1.1 2.7 3.8 4.9 Puckett Elementary 2 43 101 20 7 6 5 23.6 55.5 11.0 3.8 3.3 2.7 Puckett Elementary 3 65 106 4 2 4 1 35.7 58.2 2.2 1.1 2.2 0.5 Puckett Elementary 4 59 106 6 2 2 7 32.4 58.2 3.3 1.1 1.1 3.8 Puckett Elementary 5 56 103 5 2 14 2 30.8 56.6 2.7 1.1 7.7 1.1 Puckett Elementary 6 61 107 3 6 3 2 33.5 58.8 1.6 3.3 1.6 1.1 Puckett Elementary 7 45 95 24 7 9 2 24.7 52.2 13.2 3.8 4.9 1.1 Puckett Elementary 8 82 97 1 1 0 1 45.1 53.3 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 Puckett Elementary 9 55 116 2 2 5 2 30.2 63.7 1.1 1.1 2.7 1.1 Puckett Elementary 10 63 108 4 0 2 5 34.6 59.3 2.2 0.0 1.1 2.7 Riverside Elementary 1 66 140 8 0 6 8 28.9 61.4 3.5 0.0 2.6 3.5 Riverside Elementary 2 47 148 17 2 10 4 20.6 64.9 7.5 0.9 4.4 1.8 Riverside Elementary 3 88 129 6 2 3 0 38.6 56.6 2.6 0.9 1.3 0.0 Riverside Elementary 4 65 143 12 1 1 6 28.5 62.7 5.3 0.4 0.4 2.6 Riverside Elementary 5 48 119 24 8 27 2 21.1 52.2 10.5 3.5 11.8 0.9 Riverside Elementary 6 54 137 17 2 16 2 23.7 60.1 7.5 0.9 7.0 0.9 Riverside Elementary 7 31 117 49 8 15 8 13.6 51.3 21.5 3.5 6.6 3.5 Riverside Elementary 8 97 124 5 0 1 1 42.5 54.4 2.2 0.0 0.4 0.4 Riverside Elementary 9 49 150 12 3 10 4 21.5 65.8 5.3 1.3 4.4 1.8 Riverside Elementary 10 64 142 21 0 1 0 28.1 62.3 9.2 0.0 0.4 0.0 Sunset Elementary 1 124 192 15 1 9 16 34.7 53.8 4.2 0.3 2.5 4.5 Sunset Elementary 2 128 202 10 1 11 5 35.9 56.6 2.8 0.3 3.1 1.4 Sunset Elementary 3 176 171 6 0 1 3 49.3 47.9 1.7 0.0 0.3 0.8 Sunset Elementary 4 165 176 5 0 4 7 46.2 49.3 1.4 0.0 1.1 2.0 Sunset Elementary 5 141 167 12 1 33 3 39.5 46.8 3.4 0.3 9.2 0.8 Sunset Elementary 6 142 186 11 1 11 6 39.8 52.1 3.1 0.3 3.1 1.7 Sunset Elementary 7 93 169 44 6 23 22 26.1 47.3 12.3 1.7 6.4 6.2 Sunset Elementary 8 187 159 6 0 2 3 52.4 44.5 1.7 0.0 0.6 0.8 Sunset Elementary 9 142 182 5 3 22 3 39.8 51.0 1.4 0.8 6.2 0.8 Sunset Elementary 10 120 211 16 3 2 5 33.6 59.1 4.5 0.8 0.6 1.4 Carlsbad Municipal Schools 12 District Report Card 2006-2007

2006-2009 Carlsbad High School Assessments 2007-2009 New Mexico High School Competency Exam Carlsbad High School age of Passing on First Attempt 2007 2008 2009 Reading 81.9 86.8 88.8 Language Arts 68.4 75.8 81.9 Composition 73.6 90.5 72.8 Mathematics 78.5 82.5 86.5 Science 71.5 84.4 80.8 Social Studies 75.5 84.6 77.7 Passing all Six Subtests 48.4 64.8 55.9 2006-2009 ACT Carlsbad High School Average Scores (out of a possible 36) 2006 2007 2008 English 20.6 20.2 19.4 Mathematics 20.0 20.1 20.5 Reading 21.5 21.4 20.6 Science 20.7 20.1 20.6 Composite 20.8 20.6 20.4 Total Tested 191 153 171 2009 19.3 19.5 21.0 19.9 20.1 173 2006 Total Tested 2006-2009 Advanced Placement Carlsbad High School Total Score Possible = 5 scoring 3 or above may receive college credit. 2006 of Scoring 3 or Above 2007 Total Tested 2007 of Scoring 3 or Above 2008 Total Tested 2008 of Scoring 3 or Above 2009 Total Tested 2009 of Scoring 3 or Above Biology 27 8 9 3 21 8 17 4 Calculus AB 11 8 13 8 25 10 16 7 Chemistry 14 3 18 2 13 3 12 1 Macroeconomics 2 0 44 0 46 0 17 0 English Language/Composition 40 9 62 8 56 12 47 8 English Literature/Composition 26 7 59 18 36 7 38 11 Environmental Science 14 4 27 2 17 6 French Language 3 0 Government & Politics US 19 6 53 3 43 6 Music Theory 1 1 6 3 Physics B 9 6 17 5 11 4 12 1 Physics C - Mechanics 10 6 2 1 Spanish Language 16 6 8 2 10 3 12 5 Spanish Literature 3 1 1 0 Statistics 21 14 18 13 21 12 20 11 Studio Art-Drawing 8 3 2 2 4 0 Studio Art-2D Design 2 1 1 1 US History 22 3 68 4 38 2 28 1 World History 27 2 41 2 Non-Duplicated Student Count 115 172 115 146 Carlsbad Municipal Schools 13 District Report Card 2006-2007

Data Definitions and Explanations Enrollment/AYP by Subgroup/Performance ELL: Migrant: FRLP: SWD: English Language Learners, or students whose first language is a language other than English. whose parents/guardians are primarily employed in agriculture on a seasonal basis and establish temporary residence in NM. eligible for the free or reduced lunch program at their school. with Disabilities. Elementary & Secondary Act District Summary-What happens if a school does not make AYP? After 1 st year of not making AYP the school, in partnership with its district and local community, will be encouraged to: (a) perform a data analysis to determine why it did not make AYP, (b) amend its Educational Plan for Student Success (EPSS), and (c) further develop and implement strategies to improve student achievement. In addition, the Public Education Department (PED) will provide technical assistance, as requested, during this process. After 2 nd Year of not making AYP (designated School Improvement I) the school must develop an improvement plan and offer parents the option to choose a school that is not in School Improvement. After 3 rd Year of not making AYP (designated School Improvement II) the school must provide supplemental education services (SES) such as after school programs, tutoring and summer services, based on budget availability. The school must also continue to offer school choice and provide transportation or pay the cost of transportation, based upon budget availability, for students who choose to enroll in a school that is not in School Improvement. After 4 th Year of not making AYP (designated Corrective Action) in addition to the requirements listed above the school and district must also implement one or more of the following: replace staff as allowed by law, implement a new curriculum, decrease management authority of the public school, appoint an outside expert to advise the public school, extend the school day or year, and change the public school s internal organizational structure. After 5 th Year of not making AYP (designated Restructuring I) In addition to the requirements listed above, the school, district and PED must develop a plan including one or more of the following actions: re-open the public school as a charter school, replace all or most of the staff, as allowed by law, turn over the management of the public school to the PED, and make other governance changes. After 6 th year of not making AYP (designated Restructuring II) In addition to the requirements listed above, the school, district and PED must implement the plan developed in Restructuring I. How can a school be removed from improvement status? By reaching AYP targets for two consecutive years. Assessments Proficiency Levels Standard based assessments are scored according to proficiency levels that are established by committees of teachers from across New Mexico. Every question/item on each test is evaluated and studied in order to specify knowledge, skills and abilities that students should have in order to demonstrate proficiency. Based upon how many items a student answers correctly, and how well they can justify their answers, a proficiency level is assigned. The proficiency levels are:, Nearing Proficient, Proficient and Advanced. Since the assessments are designed to measure how well students are achieving the New Mexico standards, students scoring at the Proficient or Advanced level are designated as having met the standards. Teacher Quality Data Data for the of teachers with Bachelor s degree or Master s degree and higher are obtained from the STARS 120 th day Staff file submission for the 2006-07 school year. Data for the of core academic classes not taught by Highly Qualified Teachers also comes from the report obtained from the STARS 120 th day for 2006-07, highly qualified teacher report generated on 05/16/2008. Feeder School Methodology Feeder schools are kindergarten through second grade schools, and their students do not take the standards-based tests. NCLB requires that all schools be rated for Adequate Yearly Progress, including feeder schools. These schools are rated on the performance of third grade students who once attended there. High and Low Poverty Schools High Poverty Schools: Schools with the most students eligible for Free or Reduced Lunch (Top 25%). Low Poverty Schools: Schools with the fewest students eligible for Free or Reduced Lunch (Bottom 25%). Carlsbad Municipal Schools 14 District Report Card 2006-2007

Parental ification ACCESS TO SCHOOL RECORDS/INFORMATION. Access to educational records is governed by the requirements of the Amended Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 and district policy. Under this act and policy, non-custodial parents have the right only to academic and attendance records. Parents must inform the school principal in writing, on a form provided in the principal s office, if they wish to limit media access to their student s pictures, honors, or other recognition as outlined in Policy 6.41. ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. After the second grading period, parents will be notified regarding students who will not make adequate yearly progress. Parent conferences will be held in February regarding student progress and possible retention. (NMSA 1978, 22-2A-6) ANTI-BULLYING: Bullying behavior by any student in the Carlsbad Municipal School District is strictly prohibited and such conduct may result in disciplinary action, including suspension and/or expulsion from school. Bullying means any repeated and pervasive written, verbal or electronic expression, physical act or gesture, or a pattern thereof, that is intended to cause distress upon one or more students in the school, on school grounds, in school vehicles, at a designated bus stop, or at school activities or sanctioned events. Bullying includes, but is not limited to, hazing, harassment, intimidation or menacing acts of a student which may or may not be based on the student s race, color, sex, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, age or sexual orientation that a reasonable person under the circumstances should know will have the effect of: - Placing a student in reasonable fear of physical harm or damage to the student s property. - Physically harming a student or damaging a student s property. - Insulting or demeaning any student or group of students in such a way as to disrupt or interfere with the school s educational mission or the education of any student. and parents may file verbal complaints concerning suspected bullying behavior with school personnel and administrators. Any report of suspected bullying behavior will be promptly reviewed. If acts of bullying are verified, prompt disciplinary action may be taken against the perpetrator, up to and including suspension and/or expulsion. (NMAC-N, 6.12.7.7, 11-30-06) CORPORAL PUNISHMENT/NOTIFICATION. All school personnel are encouraged to practice a high standard of professional ethics in regard to discipline. The administration of corporal punishment, although legal in New Mexico, will not be administered by staff of the Carlsbad Municipal Schools. Additionally, Carlsbad Municipal Schools will not permit nor be a witness to the use of Corporal Punishment by parents/guardians on school premises. FAMILY EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS & PRIVACY ACT/PROTECTION OF PUPIL RIGHTS ACT (FERPA/PPRA). In compliance with the NCLB Act, the parent has the right to: (a) Inspect surveys created by third parties before such surveys are administered or distributed to students (b) Inspect and the right of students to refuse to participate in any surveys designed to collect private information about, among other things, students or their families political affiliations, sexual behaviors and attitudes, mental problems, illegal behavior, income, and religious practices or beliefs. (c) Inspect, upon request, any instructional material used in the educational curriculum for the student. (d) Be informed of the administration of physical examinations or screenings that the school may administer to students. (e) Know of the collection, disclosure or use of personal information collected from students for the purpose of marketing or selling such information. (f) Inspect, upon request, any instrument used in the collection of personal student information to be used for marketing purposes. The PPRA now obligates schools to provide parents reasonable notice, at least once annually at the beginning of the school year, of the adoption and implementation of the policies required by the Act. This notice must offer an opportunity to parents to opt the student out of participation of any instructional material used as part of the educational curriculum. The PPRA now requires schools to provide notice to parents of: (a) Activities involving the collection or disclosure of personal student information for marketing purposes. (b) The administration of any survey designed to gather private student information in the various categories listed under the PPRA. (c) Any non-emergency, invasive physical examination or screening that is required as a condition of attendance, administered by the school and scheduled in advance, and not necessary to protect the immediate health and safety of the student or other students. MILITARY RECRUITER ACCESS TO INFORMATION/SCHOOL RECORDS. Both the NCLB Act of 2001 (P.L. No. 107-110), and the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (P.L. No. 107-107), entitle military recruiters to receive the name, address, and telephone listing of juniors and seniors in high school. Parents may make a written request to the building principal to opt out of having the school provide directory information to military recruiters. The Carlsbad Municipal School District will allow military recruiters (i.e., Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard, National Guard) to be available on the high school campus for job fairs, as well as to visit with interested students, at the student s request during his/her lunch periods. PESTICIDE SPRAYING NOTIFICATION. As per the New Mexico Public Education Department Regulation 9.13.4, a written request for advance notice of pesticide spraying prior to application may be made by a parent or guardian. This written request for notification should be turned in to the building principal. PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE. Under NMSA, Chapter 22 and Title I of the NCLB, the option of school choice must be made available for all New Mexico students attending a school with a NCLB designation. Public School Choice is the option for a student to attend another public school that is outside the student s school attendance area. All students enrolled in any Title I school identified under NCLB as in School Improvement, Corrective Action, or Restructuring qualify for a transfer under Public School Choice. A school district must provide all students in the school the option to transfer to another public school, including charter schools, that is not in school improvement. (continued on page 16) Carlsbad Municipal Schools 15 District Report Card 2006-2007