Grandview Elementary School

State Board of Education School Report Card for 2003-2004 Grandview Elementary School State Board of Education Members Gov. Bob Riley, Board President Sandra Ray, President Pro Tem and Presiding Officer, District 7 Dr. Ethel Hall, Vice President Emerita, District 4 Randy McKinney, District 1 Betty Peters, District 2 Stephanie Bell, District 3 Ella Bell, District 5 David F. Byers, Jr., District 6 Dr. Mary Jane Caylor, District 8 Joseph B. Morton, Superintendent of Education Principal Mr. Todd Weeks Superintendent Dr. Leon T Hobbs School Board Members Mr. James E Hemby Mrs. Margaret Johnson Mr. Earl C Jones Mr. Jimmy Addison Ms. Gayla White Mr. David Morales Mr. Marc Nelson Grandview Elementary School 900 6th Ave Dothan, AL 36301-2898 (334)794-1483 Report cards are prepared by the Alabama Department of Education. For more information including a glossary of terms, grading scales, and detailed data, visit the SDE Web site Accountability Reporting System at: http://www.alsde.edu/accountability/preaccountability.asp

G E N E R A L I N F O R M A T I O N Average Daily Membership This is the average number of students on attendance rolls during the first 40 days of school. Year 2003-2004 2002-2003 2001-2002 ADM 370.4 390.8 390.1 % School % System % State 105% % 95% 97.2 97.0 96.2 96.2 96.7 96.0 95.7 96.2 96.0 Average Daily Attendance This is the percent of students that attend school each day. 90% 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 % School % System % State Students Eligible for Free or Reduced Price Meals This is the percent of students that applied for and were approved as reported on the First 40-Day Attendance Report. It is an indicator of poverty. % 80% 60% 40% 20% 88.1 69.1 53.6 50.2 48.8 49.7 49.7 50.7 89.6 0% 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 Grandview Elementary School Dothan City Alabama 2.3 2.3 3.9 3.8 4.3 4.6 Classroom Computers With Internet Access All Computers Technology Internet access and computer use in schools. A lower number indicates greater student access to technology. 0 2 4 6 8 10 2

G E N E R A L I N F O R M A T I O N Staffing Each school is staffed with full- and part-time faculty and staff. In 2003-2004, this school employed the following professionals. Teachers Counselors Librarians Administrators Nurses Instruction Assistants Other (certified) Support Staff School System State 25.5 530.0 47,329.5 1.0 22.0 1,676.8 1.0 19.0 1,355.5 1.0 31.0 2,624.9 0.2 4.0 576.8 5.0 95.1 6,128.4 0.7 13.7 1,479.1 12.8 445.7 34,515.5 Highly Qualified Teachers This is the percent of teachers that are teaching and the percent of classes taught in a core subject for which the teacher is highly qualified by the State of Alabama as required by the federal legislation known as: No Child Left Behind. HQT Teachers HQT Core Classes School System State 90.91 87.22 76.69 91.11 88.53 75.10 Professional Qualifications This table represents the percentage of teachers holding each type of degree in this school. Safety & Discipline The following chart shows the types of discipline problems that have occurred at this school and what actions were taken in 2003-2004. of Teachers Holding This Degree 6-Year Bachelor s Master s through Degree Degree Doctorate 70.0% 30.0% 0.0% Number of Action Taken Type of Incidents Sent to Incident Reported Suspension Expulsion Alternative School Assault Bomb Threat Drug Related Weapon Related 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 As required by federal law, students must be allowed to transfer to another school if their school is identified as persistently dangerous. Is this a transfer option school? NO 3

S T A T E A C C O U N T A B I L I T Y Adequate Yearly Progress Based on School State Accountability in Alabama is based on the federal law known as the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001. NCLB uses the term Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) to describe whether a school or system has met its annual accountability goals. COMPONENTS OF AYP 1. Annual Goals for Reading and Mathematics age of students scoring proficient or higher 2. Indicators Affecting Academic Proficiency Attendance Drop-out Rate 3. Participation Rate age of students participating in assessments ASSESSMENTS USED IN DETERMINING AYP Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test (ARMT) Reading: Grades 4, 6, and 8 Mathematics: Grades 4 and 6 Alabama High School Graduation Exam (AHSGE) Reading: Grade 11 Mathematics: Grade 11 Alabama Alternate Assessment (AAA) Reading: Grades 4, 6, 8, and 11 Mathematics: Grades 4, 6, and 11 For more detail on the Alabama Accountability System, please reference the Accountability Interpretive Guide which can be found on the SDE Web site: http://www.alsde.edu/accountability/preaccountability.asp Select the 2004 Accountability Reporting System option on the home page. Then request the School Year: 2003-2004 Report: 2004 Interpretive Guide for State Accountability 4

S T A T E A C C O U N T A B I L I T Y Status for 2004-2005 Year 2003-2004 Data This school met 7 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) goals out of 9 (77.78%) Reading Met Proficiency Student Group Participation Participation Index Met Proficient Goal = 95.00% AYP Goal = 0.00 AYP* Special Education Students American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Limited English Proficient Free/Reduced Lunch 97.92 Yes Yes Yes -16.6 ~ -18 ~ -16.6 No Mathematics Met Proficiency Student Group Participation Participation Index Met Proficient Goal = 95.00% AYP Goal = 0.00 AYP* Special Education Students American Indian/Alaskan Native Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Limited English Proficient Free/Reduced Lunch 98 Yes Yes Yes -18.9 ~ -21.6 ~ -19.3 No Additional Academic Indicators Attendance Four-Year Four-Year Student Group Attendance Rate Met Projected Projected Met Four-Year Rate Previous Attendance Dropout Rate Dropout Rate Projected Goal = 95.00% Year AYP* Goal = 10.00 Previous Year Dropout AYP** 95.87 96.7 Yes n\a reported, less than 10 students (protects confidenciality). = in AYP, less than 40 students (ensures reliability). * AYP is met if the goal is met or the goal is within the confidence interval (ensures reliability). ** AYP is met if the goal is met or there is improvement from the previous year. 5

S T U D E N T A C A D E M I C P E R F O R M A N C E READING SCHOOL SYSTEM Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Grade 4 Special Education Students American Indian / Alaskan Native Asian / Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Male Female Free / Reduced Lunch Limited English Proficient Migrant Grade 6 Special Education Students American Indian / Alaskan Native Asian / Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Male Female Free / Reduced Lunch Limited English Proficient Migrant Grade 8 Special Education Students American Indian / Alaskan Native Asian / Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Male Female Free / Reduced Lunch Limited English Proficient Migrant.00 5.88 41.18 39.22 13.73 95.33 1.80 21.90 44.44 31.86.00 *** *** *** *** 83.33 12.31 63.08 12.31 12.31 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a.00 *** *** *** *** n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a.00 *** *** *** ***.00 4.76 38.10 45.24 11.90 93.56 2.40 29.94 53.59 14.07.00 *** *** *** *** 91.67 0.00 9.09 72.73 18.18.00 *** *** *** *** 97.74 1.16 11.97 32.43 54.44.00 10.34 48.28 27.59 13.79 95.83 2.34 28.09 40.47 29.10.00 0.00 31.82 54.55 13.64 94.85 1.28 15.97 48.24 34.50 97.92 4.26 40.43 40.43 14.89 91.91 2.40 29.87 49.07 18.67 *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 94.81 1.37 19.48 29.98 49.16 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 84.81 7.46 50.75 31.34 10.45 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a.00 *** *** *** *** n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 94.12 2.56 28.98 36.93 31.53 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a.00 0.00 27.27 9.09 63.64 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 95.71 0.00 7.93 22.76 69.31 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 92.56 2.08 24.70 28.87 44.35 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 97.27 0.62 14.02 31.15 54.21 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 90.02 1.94 26.59 35.18 36.29 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a *** *** *** *** n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 93.43 5.35 41.90 31.50 21.25 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 84.27 37.33 57.33 5.33 0.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a.00 *** *** *** *** n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a.00 *** *** *** *** n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 91.20 8.19 56.73 27.78 7.31 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a.00 *** *** *** *** n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 95.83 2.01 24.75 36.45 36.79 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 90.45 7.14 48.45 27.33 17.08 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 96.51 3.61 35.54 35.54 25.30 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 89.37 8.36 54.34 28.94 8.36 6

S T U D E N T A C A D E M I C P E R F O R M A N C E MATHEMATICS SCHOOL SYSTEM Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4.00 16.00 42.00 28.00 14.00 95.79 6.34 23.58 30.08 40.00.00 *** *** *** *** 88.46 40.58 34.78 13.04 11.59 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a.00 *** *** *** *** n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a.00 *** *** *** *** 97.62 14.63 43.90 29.27 12.20 94.12 9.82 33.04 36.61 20.54.00 *** *** *** *** 91.67 0.00 27.27 36.36 36.36.00 *** *** *** *** 98.11 1.92 11.92 21.15 65.00.00 24.14 37.93 20.69 17.24 96.79 7.95 24.50 26.49 41.06 95.45 4.76 47.62 38.10 9.52 94.85 4.79 22.68 33.55 38.98 95.83 13.04 43.48 28.26 15.22 92.40 9.02 29.18 35.28 26.53 *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ALABAMA READING AND MATHEMATICS TEST The Alabama Reading and Mathematics Tests provide an assessment of students' mastery of the content contained in the Alabama Course of Study. The Reading Test was given in the fourth, sixth, and eighth grades. The Mathematics Test was given in the fourth and sixth grades. n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 94.66 1.83 48.02 32.93 17.23 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 83.54 12.12 75.76 10.61 1.52 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a.00 *** *** *** *** n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 94.12 2.84 63.07 27.27 6.82 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 90.91 0.00 30.00 50.00 20.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 95.71 0.69 30.69 38.97 29.66 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 92.29 2.69 51.64 28.96 16.72 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 97.27 0.93 44.24 37.07 17.76 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 89.53 2.79 59.33 29.53 8.36 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a *** *** *** *** NOT APPLICABLE IN 2003-2004 7

S T U D E N T A C A D E M I C P E R F O R M A N C E Alabama Alternate Assessment 2004 The Alabama Alternate Assessment is designed for special education students whose Individualized Education Program [IEP] team determines that the student will not participate in the regular state assessments. The Alabama Alternate Assessment is an evaluation of the student s accomplishment of his/her IEP. READING SCHOOL SYSTEM Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.27 *** *** *** *** MATHEMATICS SCHOOL SYSTEM Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 2.00 *** *** *** *** 0.54 14.29 14.29 50.00 21.43 Alabama Direct Assessment of Writing 2004 Alabama students in grades five, seven, and ten are given the Alabama Direct Assessment of Writing each year to measure their writing skills. This table shows how well students met the performance standard on this test. SCHOOL SYSTEM Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Grade 5 Grade 7 Grade 10 82.61 8.77 36.84 49.12 5.26 83.45 4.96 33.09 53.64 8.31 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 80.27 5.62 44.66 44.10 5.62 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 80.27 2.80 37.13 51.49 8.58 8

T A X P A Y E R S R E P O R T F I S C A L Y E A R 2 0 0 3 % Total 2003-2004 Fiscal Year Revenue = $62,701,614.29 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 57.7% 22.6% 15.3% 3.2% 1.3% State Local Tax Local School Federal Other Sources of School System Revenues % Total 2003-2004 Fiscal Year Spending = $60,440,956.69 School System s Use of Funds 80% 60% 40% 70.0% 20% 0% Instruction SOURCE of REVENUE Local School Revenue Local Capital Projects Revenue Other Local Revenue (includes local taxes) Total Local Revenue 3.6% 7.2% Operational/ Maintenance AMOUNT 1.6% 3.9% Debt Service $1,991,459.91 $365,459.00 $13,788,928.30 $16,145,847.21 Administration Transportation 8.0% Food Service 0.2% Capital Outlay 5.4% Other Local Revenue Breakdown This table provides a breakdown of local revenues for fiscal year 2003. The revenue from local school projects / activities and the capital projects fund have been itemized to provide a more complete analysis of local fund sources. Mills Equivalent This is the total amount of revenue collected locally for public school purposes, divided by the value of one regular system mill of ad valorem tax. The state average is 30.97 mills equivalent. This System 23.71 D Grade Spending per Student The table below shows the spending per student for this school system. The letter grade compares the system s per student spending to the state, southeast, and nation. Year Amount State Southeast Nation 2001-2002 2002-2003 $6,107.94 C C- D $6,235.08 C D+ D A = Excellent B = Good C = Average D = Poor F = Fail