Resistance to Phomopsis Stem Canker in Cultivated Sunflower 2011 Field Trials Tom Gulya,, Sue Thompson and Mal Ryley USDA-ARS, ARS, Fargo ND DEEDI, Toowoomba, AU
Acknowledgements - NSA funding Seed companies (CHS, Croplan, Mycogen and Seeds2000) for plot land and maintenance Seed companies participating in hybrid evaluations USDA technicians
Phomopsis Increasing in U.S. 70% 16% 60% 14% 50% 12% 40% 10% 8% 30% 6% 20% 4% 2% 10% 0% 0% Phomopsis Incidence in U.S. Sunflower Fields Phomopsis Severity in U.S. Sunflower Crop 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Objectives Search for resistance in cross-section section of USDA Plant Introduction collection Data to be used in association mapping project Evaluate U.S. commercial hybrids & compare with Phomopsis resistant hybrids from Novi Sad program (Serbia)
Methodology Test sites located in Red River Valley (Crookston, Grandin, Rothsay) ) and one in north-central SD. All four locations relying on natural infection and dryland conditions In total 8 single rows replications of PIs. Hybrids planted at 3 locations, 4 reps each.
Methodology Plant stands counted once, at maturity Phomopsis infected plants rated once, in late September (any # of lesions) Disease severity expressed as % infected plants. Three pathologists rated all three trials.
Distances to four Phomopsis plots: Grandin (35 mi), Rothsay (45 mi), Crookston (75 mi), Java (280 mi)
Results Lack of rainfall from August on at Grandin led to no Phomopsis. Natural Phomopsis did develop at Rothsay,, Crookston, and Java,SD. Multiple stalk samples collected from each location to determine Phomopsis species present.
Histograms of PI Ratings at three 2011 test plots 70 60 60 Crookston, MN 2011 Frequency 50 40 30 20 10 0 47 43 27 23 21 14 7 8 3 2 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Phomopsis infestation (%)
60 56 Rothsay, MN 2011 50 43 40 Frequency 30 20 23 32 28 19 10 0 11 10 5 6 6 4 4 4 3 3 0 1 1 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Phomopsis infestation (%)
30 25 27 Java, SD 2011 26 22 Frequency 20 15 10 5 10 17 17 18 14 14 19 13 12 17 6 8 4 2 6 3 3 2 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Phomopsis infestation (%)
Three locations mean 45 40 35 38 32 35 39 39 of 260 entries had < 5% Phomopsis infected plants, averaged over three locations (6 reps) Frequency 30 25 20 15 22 25 18 17 14 10 5 0 5 4 4 2 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 Phomopsis infestation (%)
Most Resistant Cultivated Plant Introductions - 18 entries had < 2% infected plants These 18 entries originated from Hungary, Spain, Zimbabwe and China. Relatively tall entries, generally in the 6.5 TO 10 range. Also fairly late in flowering,, average = 75 days. BUT three resistant entries flowered in 62 days, and were 4 to 5 ½ tall
Examples of stem lesions observed
Commercial hybrids Seven companies submit entries, for a total of 72 entries + 10 hybrids from Novi Sad, Serbia. Each company requested to have 2 released hybrids, along with experimentals. Oilseed and confection hybrids included.
Commercial Hybrids Phomopsis ratings - 2011 40% 35% 30% 25% Averaged over two locations (Rothsay & Crookston), 8 reps. Histogram Yellow bars are Novi Sad hybrids. Disease severity from 1 to 39%, mean = 11% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 1 5 9 13172125293337414549535761656973778185
Commercial Hybrids Phomopsis ratings 2010 2010 Ada MN Phomopsis Severity on 100 Sunflower Hybrids 100 90 Disease severity from 0 to 97%, mean = 42% 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
Hybrids most resistant to Phomopsis stem canker - Five NS-hybrids in top ten. Entries from Seeds2000, CHS, Mycogen,, Triumph and Croplan with < 5% infection.
Phomopsis species present - Based on morphological and DNA sequence analysis, all three locations predominantly had Phomopsis helianthi. Ms. Febina Mathew, NDSU PhD student funded by NSA, is continuing her analysis of Phomopsis isolates from across the U.S. production area to determine which other Phomopsis species may be present in the U.S.
Conclusions In 2011, we succeeded in having natural infection at 3 of 4 locations, all of which had the same Phomopsis species. Disease severity was less than observed in 2010, primarily due to drier weather. Entries with high levels of resistance were observed both within USDA public germplasm and commercial hybrids.
Conclusions 2 An effective Phomopsis field screening program would benefit from artificial inoculation. Association mapping & SNPS on the 260 USDA entries will lead to marker-assisted assisted selection for Phomopsis resistance. Phomopsis helianthi was present at all three 2011 locations. We do not know whether these resistant entries would also be resistant to the other Phomopsis species recently identified in Australia as sunflower stem pathogens (see( Thompson poster).