Management of Resistance to Fungicides used for Botrytis Control in Berries

Similar documents
Fungicide sensitivity of Botrytis cinerea causing gray mold of berries in WA

Alan Schreiber Agriculture Development Group, Inc. Tom Walters Walters Ag Research

ALAN SCHREIBER AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. TOM WALTERS WALTERS AG RESEARCH

Botrytis Control In Berries Key project cooperators

Residue Decline Curves for Blueberries and Raspberries or How To Meet MRLs in Export Markets

Merivon Xemium Brand Fungicide

Treatments protocol # Color Materials Timing FP/A Tol 1 W Untreated Y 2 OD Rovral 50WP

Your headline here in Calibri.

Final Report: Evaluation of fungicide programs for management of Botrytis bunch rot of grapes: 2017 field trials

Melanie L. Lewis Ivey and Rachel Medina Fruit Pathology Program Department of Plant Pathology The Ohio State University-Wooster Campus Wooster, OH

Evaluation of fungicide programs for management of Botrytis bunch rot of grapes: 2015 field trial

Grape disease control Update for 2015

PEACH BLOSSOM BLIGHT Biology, Control, and Fungicide Resistance Management

CONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins. Interpretive Summary

Updates to the Midwest Fruit Pest Management Guide. New Publication Title. Grape Bud Break to Prebloom. Grape Pre-bloom through Bloom

Managing Stone Fruit Diseases and Updates on the Spray Guides. Mohammad Babadoost University of Illinois 3-4 February 2015

Disease updates on Botryosphaeria (Bot)/Phomopsis, Anthracnose & Walnut Blight

Christopher Gee, Ph.D. Field Development Rep II/Technical Service Rep - Fungicides Concord, OH 44077

Foliar diseases: Citrus Canker and Citrus Black Spot

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Understanding and Managing Walnut Botryosphaeria/Phomopsis Canker and Blights (Influence of El Niño on the Sleeping Giant)

Characteristics and Monitoring of Fungicide-Resistant Grape Powdery Mildew

Managing Stone Fruit Diseases. Mohammad Babadoost University of Illinois Tree Fruit Schools 2,3 February 2016

Commercial Crop Production Fruit and Nut Crops - Stone Fruits

Commercial Crop Production Fruit and Nut Crops - Stone Fruits

Report to the OSU Agricultural Research Foundation for the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

Virginia Wine Board Project # Annual Progress Report - July 2015

Organic Almond Production. by Brent A. Holtz, PhD County Director and Farm Advisor San Joaquin County

Fruit Crops Grapes. Diseases of Grapes and Fungicides Labeled for Control. Disease Fungicides a Efficacy b

Grape. Disease Control

Annual Bluegrass (Poa annua L.) Control In Non-Overseeded Bermudagrass Turf Report

Fruit Crops Stone Fruits (Peaches, Plums, Etc.)

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Ames Plantation, Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith. Interpretative Summary

Fall Pepper Variety Evaluation

Industry Update Bayer CropScience. Bayer CropScience LABEL UPDATE. Santa Maria Phil McNally March 2014

Improving the management of plant and fruit diseases affecting strawberry production in Australia and Florida

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C.

Improving Efficacy of GA 3 to Increase Fruit Set and Yield of Clementine Mandarins in California

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Commercial Crop Production Small Fruit - Grapes

Report to the Agricultural Research Foundation for Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission 2005

Commercial Crop Production Small Fruit - Grapes

Fungicide control of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot on grape: 2014 field trial

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Cultivar Evaluation, New York 2007

Management and research of fruit rot diseases in vineyards

Strawberry Pests and Diseases: IPM Studies and the Pallidosis-related Decline

RESEARCH REPORT - OREGON PROCESSED VEGETABLE COMMISSION. Control and Management of Common Smut on Corn in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

Grapevine Powdery Mildew Erysiphe necator

The Power of Native Yeasts

Influence of fungicides and cultivar on development of cavity spot of carrot.

Early Post-emergent control of Oxalis stricta (Oxalis) Chris Marble and Charles Gilliam

Fungicide Control of Phomopsis Cane and Leaf Spot on Grapevine: 2015 Field Trial

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary.

IR-4 Food Use Workshop

Ontogenetical resistance of grapes - a chance to reduce fungicide residues in wines?

Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008

Powdery Mildew-resistant Melon Variety Evaluation, New York 2012

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 4 June 2012 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

2008 Research Report to the Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Management of cucurbit diseases in the panhandle: Notes for 2016

Technical Product Guide

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Fungicide Timing and Selection Conundrum 2015 Annual Report

Report of Progress 961

Strategies for improving the control of plant and fruit diseases affecting strawberry fields in Queensland and Florida

Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015

to feeding damage resulting in the characteristic russeting that can reduce fruit yield and

Volunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat year two. Mark Thorne, Henry Wetzel, Drew Lyon, Tim Waters

A new option to control BOTRYTIS in wine grapes

Control of Botrytis cinereain strawberries with Gliocladiumcatenulatumvectored by bumblebees

Botryosphaeria, Phomopsis and Anthracnose Management in Walnuts

Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Materials and Methods... 1 Results... 2 Acknowledgements... 3 Table Seedless Watermelon Variety Trial:

Control of Powdery Mildew in Wine Grape. N.L. Rothwell and K.L. Powers, NWMHRS A. Schilder, Dept. of Plant Pathology, MSU

Prospects for the prevention in the field and the in post harvest of brown rot and lenticell rot

April 1995 Volume 5, Number 2

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

2010 Cotton Harvest Aids

Late-season disease control options to manage diseases, but minimize fermentation problems and wine defects

The NEW Benchmark Fungicide for Grape Growers. Grapes A GUIDE FOR GRAPE GROWERS. Superior Multi-Crop Control

What s the Deal About Black Leg of Brassicas?

Control of Black Rot in Greenhouse and Field Trials Using Organic Approved Materials, 2006

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

Management of Pepper and Tomato Diseases

Trials on Western Flower Thrips

Trial Report: Yellow Squash and Zucchini Spring and Fall Variety Evaluation 2015

Corn (Field) and Sorghum Seed Treatment

Title: Cultivar Evaluation for Control of Common Smut in Sweet Corn and High Plains Virus in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington.

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

GRAPE POWDERY MILDEW: MANAGEMENT AND RESISTANCE

Fungicide Resistance. Management in Apple and Pear Pathogens. Introduction. Resistance terminology

MISSISSIPPI SOYBEAN PROMOTION BOARD PROJECT NO (CONT) 2014 Annual Report

EDIBLE BEAN AGRONOMY AND PEST MANAGEMENT RESEARCH RESULTS C.L. GILLARD S. WILLIS D. DEPUYDT

Role of lygus bug in fruit deformity. IPM tools for managing lygus bug

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION... UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA FRUIT AND NUT NOTES

Ohio Grape-Wine Electronic Newsletter

Transcription:

Management of Resistance to Fungicides used for Botrytis Control in Berries Tobin Peever David Dutton Olga Kozhar Dalphy Harteveld Adrian Alcocer Amreen Toor Funding: WBC WRRC WSCPR WSCBG BC Blueberry Council Department of Plant Pathology, WSU Annemiek Schilder

Gray mold Fungicide Resistance Elevate (fenhexamid) - inhibitor of sterol biosynthesis FRAC group 17 Rovral (iprodione) inhibitor of osmoregulation FRAC group 2 Switch (cyprodinil) inhibitor of methionine biosynthesis FRAC group 9 Switch (fludioxonil) inhibitor of osmoregulation FRAC group 12 Pristine (boscalid) inhibitor of respiration FRAC group 7

Blueberry Botrytis Sampling 2015 Sampled B. cinerea from 3 blueberry fields in Skagit Co., 1 field in Island Co. and 4 fields in Whatcom Co. in 2015 (n =85) Sampled conventional and low fungicide input fields Field Code County Treatment BC-19-1 Skagit Conventional BC-19-3 Skagit Conventional BC-19-11 Skagit Low Input BC-22-4 Island Low Input BC-19-13 Whatcom Conventional BC-19-6 Whatcom Conventional BC-22-8 Whatcom Conventional BC-19-10 Whatcom Conventional

WA Blueberry Botrytis 2015 Fungicide Resistance Fenhexamid Boscalid Cyprodinil 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Field 1 Field 2 Field 3 Field 4 Field 5 Field 6 Field 7 Field 8 Skagit Whatcom

Summary No evidence of resistance to fludioxonil or iprodione in WA or rest of PNW to date Resistance detected to 3 of 5 site-specific fungicides used to control Botrytis in berries some fields have high levels to all 3 Widespread resistance to fenhexamid, boscalid, and cyprodinil in multiple berry crops need to reduce selection Large variation in frequencies of resistance from field to field are Botrytis populations quite local? Clear correlation of fungicide use history to fungicide resistance strong selection for resistance

FRAC Group 7 Fungicides (SDHIs) Inhibit succinate dehydrogenase in the mitochondrion (http://www.frac.info/working-group/sdhi-fungicides) Boscalid widespread resistance in PNW average freq. ~ 70% Isofetamid ( Kenja, ISK) Adepidyn ( Miravis, Syngenta) Fluopyram ( Luna series, Bayer) Penthiopyrad ( Fontelis, Dupont) Fluxapyroxad ( Xemium, BASF) New FRAC Group 7 Fungicides New SDHI fungicides are claimed by their manufacturers to control most boscalid-resistant strains of Botrytis cinerea Mechanism of boscalid resistance is known mutations in subunits B, C, and D of succinate dehydrogenase abolish binding Efficacy of these new fungicides will depend on which mutations are present in PNW

Group 7 EC 50 Values in PNW 12 10 boscalid adepidyn Frequency 8 6 4 2 Cut-off value for boscalid resistance isofetamid fluopyram penthiopyrad 0 540 520 500 480 460 440 420 400 380 360 340 320 300 280 260 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 EC 50

Cross-Resistance Resistance to Fungicide B Fungicides in the same FRAC group are generally cross-resistant Resistance to Fungicide A

Cross resistance to boscalid in PNW Botrytis Fluopyram (5ppm) 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Isofetamid (1ppm) 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Boscalid (5ppm) Boscalid (5ppm) Adepidyn (1ppm) 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Boscalid (5ppm) Penthiopyrad (5ppm) 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Boscalid (5ppm)

Next Steps Screen a larger number of B. cinerea isolates from different berry crops in WA for sensitivity to adepidyn, isofetamid, fluopyram, penthiopyrad, fluxapyroxad, solatenol Relate in vitro sensitivity to field rates of fungicides on fruit establish a threshold for resistance for each fungicide Field trials of new Group 7 fungicides to test efficacy and support registration for use on berries

New Products and Resistance Management Strategies for Mummy Berry and Botrytis Alan Schreiber and Tom Walters

Mummy berry and botrytis trial #1 Skagit Valley 15 treatments, 6 programs and 8 active ingredients only. Trial location was previously organic. Pressure was moderate not too low, not too high. No resistance Started applications very early end of February. Trial location was adjacent to the organic trial.

Conventional Mummyberry and Botrytis Control in Blueberry #1 Trt Treatment Form Form Rate # of No. Name Conc Unit Rate Unit Applications 1UTC 2Indar 2F 2LB/GAL 6fl oz/a ABCD 2Pristine 38% 20oz/a DEF 3Orbit 3.6LB/GAL 6fl oz/a ABCD 3Switch 62.5% 14oz wt/a DEF 4Quash 50 WDG 50% 2.5oz/a ABCD 4Switch 62.5% 14oz wt/a DEF 5Pristine 38% 20oz/a ABCDEF 6Rovral 4LB/GAL 32fl oz/a ABCDE 7Chlorothalonil 6LB/GAL 32fl oz/a ABCDEF 8Captan 50 WP 50% 2.76lb/a ABCDEF 9Luna Tranquility 45% 13.6fl oz/a ABCDEF 10Propulse 34.8% 13.6fl oz/a ABCDEF 11Proline 4LB/GAL 5.7oz/a ABCDEF 12Rovral 4LB/GAL 32fl oz/a A 12Topguard Speciality 1LB/GAL 13fl oz/a B 12Rovral 4LB/GAL 32fl oz/a C 12Pristine 38% 18oz/a D 12Fracture 20% 24fl oz/a E 13Fracture 20% 24fl oz/a ABCDE 14Topguard Speciality 1LB/GAL 13fl oz/a ABCDE 15Rovral 4LB/GAL 32fl oz/a A 15Fracture 20% 24fl oz/a B 15Topguard Speciality 1LB/GAL 13fl oz/a C 15Pristine 38% 18oz/a D 15Topguard Speciality 1LB/GAL 13fl oz/a E

Conventional Mummyberry and Botrytis Control in Blueberry #1 - Skagit Valley Trt Treatment Mummy berry strikes flowers/leaves/plot flower/leave/plant berries/plant Botrytis on berries No. Name 3-May 3-May 25-Jun 25-Jun 1 UTC 15.3 a 1.9a 12.0 a 4.3 abc 2 Ind/Ind/Ind/Ind/Pris/Pris 0.0 d 0.0d 2.0 cd 0.8 d 3 Orb/Orb/Orb/Orb/Swi/Swit/Swit 1.3 cd 0.2cd 5.8 a-d 1.3 cd 4 Qua/Qua/Qua/Qua/Swi/Swi/Swi 1.0 cd 0.1cd 1.0 cd 2.8 bcd 5 Pristine 2.0bcd 0.3bcd 1.0cd 1.8bcd 6 Rov/Rov/Rov/Rov/Rov (4 vs 5) 6.8bc 0.9bc 9.3abc 1.5bcd 7 Chlorothalonil 5.8 bcd 0.8bcd 8.3 a-d 2.8 bcd 8 Captan 50 WP 8.3 b 1.1b 11.3 ab 1.8 bcd 9 Luna Tranquility 1.5cd 0.2cd 0.5cd 0.8d 10 Propulse 1.0cd 0.1cd 0.0d 1.0cd 11 Proline 0.0 d 0.0d 0.0 d 2.0 bcd 12 Rov/TopG/Rov/Pris/Frac 2.8 bcd 0.4bcd 6.0 a-d 3.5 a-d 13 Fracture 0.8cd 0.1cd 3.0bcd 6.5a 14 Topguard Speciality 0.8cd 0.1cd 2.0cd 4.8ab 15 Rov/Frac/TopG/Pris/TopG 1.3cd 0.18cd 2.5bcd 4.8ab

Conventional Mummyberry and Botrytis Control in Blueberry #1 - Skagit Valley ranked by mummyberry strikes on flowers/leaves per plot Mummy berry strikes Trt Treatment flowers/leaves/plot flowers/leave/plant berries/plant Botrytis on berries No. Name 3-May 3-May 25-Jun 25-Jun 2Ind/Ind/Ind/Ind/Pris/Pris 0.0d 0.0d 2.0 cd 0.8 d 11Proline 0.0d 0.0d 0.0 d 2.0 bcd 13Fracture 0.8cd 0.1cd 3.0 bcd 6.5 a 14Topguard Speciality 0.8cd 0.1cd 2.0 cd 4.8 ab 4Qua/Qua/Qua/Qua/Swi/Swit/Swit 1.0cd 0.1cd 1.0 cd 2.8 bcd 10Propulse 1.0cd 0.1cd 0.0 d 1.0 cd 3Orb/Orb/Orb/Orb/Swit/Swit/Swit 1.3cd 0.2cd 5.8 a-d 1.3 cd 15Rov/Frac/TopG/Pris/TopG 1.3cd 0.2cd 2.5 bcd 4.8 ab 9Luna Tranquility 1.5cd 0.2cd 0.5cd 0.8d 5Pristine 2.0bcd 0.3bcd 1.0 cd 1.8 bcd 12Rov/TopG/Rov/Pris/Frac 2.8bcd 0.4bcd 6.0 a-d 3.5 a-d 7Chlorothalonil 5.8bcd 0.8bcd 8.3 a-d 2.8 bcd 6Rov/Rov/Rov/Rov/Rov 6.8bc 0.9bc 9.3 abc 1.5 bcd 8Captan 50 WP 8.3b 1.1b 11.3 ab 1.8 bcd 1UTC 15.3a 1.9a 12.0 a 4.3 abc

Conventional Mummyberry and Botrytis Control in Blueberry #1 - Skagit Valley incidence on fruit Mummy berry strikes Trt Treatment flowers/leaves/plot flower/leave/plant berries/plant Botrytis on berries No. Name 3-May 3-May 25-Jun 25-Jun 11 Proline 0.0 d 0.0 d 0.0d 2.0 bcd 10 Propulse 1.0cd 0.1cd 0.0d 1.0cd 9 Luna Tranquility 1.5cd 0.2cd 0.5cd 0.8d 4 Qua/Qua/Qua/Qua/Swi/Swi/Swi 1.0 cd 0.1 cd 1.0cd 2.8 bcd 5 Pristine 2.0bcd 0.3bcd 1.0cd 1.8bcd 2 Ind/Ind/Ind/Ind/Pris/Pris 0.0 d 0.0 d 2.0cd 0.8 d 14 Topguard Speciality 0.8cd 0.1cd 2.0cd 4.8ab 15 Rov/Frac/TopG/Pris/TopG 1.3 cd 0.2 cd 2.5bcd 4.8 ab 13 Fracture 0.8cd 0.1cd 3.0bcd 6.5a 3 Orb/Orb/Orb/Orb/Swit/Swit/Swi 1.3 cd 0.2 cd 5.8a-d 1.3 cd 12 Rov/TopG/Rov/Pris/Frac 2.8 bcd 0.4 bcd 6.0a-d 3.5 a-d 7 Chlorothalonil 5.8 bcd 0.8 bcd 8.3a-d 2.8 bcd 6 Rov/Rov/Rov/Rov/Rov 6.8 bc 0.9 bc 9.3abc 1.5 bcd 8 Captan 50 WP 8.3 b 1.1 b 11.3ab 1.8 bcd 1 UTC 15.3 a 1.9 a 12.0a 4.3 abc

Conventional Mummyberry and Botrytis Control in Blueberry #1 - Skagit Valley ranked by Botrytis on berries Mummy berry strikes Botrytis on berries Trt Treatment flowers/leaves/plot flowers/leave/plant berries/plant No. Name 3-May 3-May 25-Jun 25-Jun 9 Luna Tranquility 1.5cd 0.2cd 0.5cd 0.8d 2 Ind/Ind/Ind/Ind/Pris/Pris 0.0d 0.0d 2.0 cd 0.8 d 10 Propulse 1.0cd 0.1cd 0.0 d 1.0 cd 3 Orb/Orb/Orb/Orb/Swit/Swit/Swit 1.3cd 0.2cd 5.8 a-d 1.3 cd 6 Rov/Rov/Rov/Rov/Rov 6.8bc 0.9bc 9.3 abc 1.5 bcd 5 Pristine 2.0bcd 0.3bcd 1.0 cd 1.8 bcd 8 Captan 50 WP 8.3b 1.1b 11.3 ab 1.8 bcd 11 Proline 0.0d 0.0d 0.0 d 2.0 bcd 4 Qua/Qua/Qua/Qua/Swit/Swit/Swi 1.0cd 0.1cd 1.0 cd 2.8 bcd 7 Chlorothalonil 5.8bcd 0.8bcd 8.3 a-d 2.8 bcd 12 Rov/TopG/Rov/Pris/Frac 2.8bcd 0.4bcd 6.0 a-d 3.5 a-d 1 UTC 15.3a 1.9a 12.0 a 4.3 abc 14 Topguard Speciality 0.8cd 0.1cd 2.0cd 4.8ab 15 Rov/Frac/TopG/Pris/TopG 1.3cd 0.2cd 2.5 bcd 4.8 ab 13 Fracture 0.8cd 0.1cd 3.0 bcd 6.5 a

Mummy berry and botrytis trial # 2 Alan Schreiber and Tom Walters

We conducted a second trial Same location as previous trials. Same experimental design. 15 treatments; 5 program treatments, 9 single active ingredient treatments, totaling 13 treatments.

Mummyberry and Botrytis Trial # 2 - Skagit Valley Trt Treatment Form Form Rate # of No. Name Conc Unit Rate Unit Applications 1 UTC 2 Chlorothalonil 6LB/GAL 32fl oz/a A 2 Indar 2F 2LB/GAL 6fl oz/a B 2 Proline 4LB/GAL 5.7fl oz/a C 2 Switch 62 WG 62%AW/W 11oz/a D 2 Pristine 38% 18oz/a E 2 Abound 2.08LB/GAL 10fl oz/a F 2 Elevate 50% 1.5lb/a F 3 Meteor 4LB/GAL 32oz/a ABCDEF 4 Topsin M 70% 1.5lb/a ABCDEF 4 Meteor 4LB/GAL 32oz/a ABCDEF 5 Torino SC 10% 3.4fl oz/a ABCDEF 6 Torino SC 10% 5fl oz/a ABCDEF 7 Torino SC 10% 6.5fl oz/a ABCDEF 8 Kenja 400 SC 400g/L 13.5fl oz/a ABCD 9 Kenja 400 SC 400g/L 15.5fl oz/a ABCD 10 Switch 62.5% 11oz/a ABCD 11 Kenja 400 SC 400g/L 13.5fl oz/a ABCD 11 Omega 500g/L 1.25fl oz/a EF 12 Chlorothalonil 6LB/GAL 32fl oz/a A 12 Indar 2F 2LB/GAL 6fl oz/a BC 12 Switch 62.5% 14oz wt/ad 13 Indar 2F 2LB/GAL 6fl oz/a AB 13 Pristine 38% 20oz/a C 13 Switch 62.5% 14oz wt/ad 14 OSO 5% 5% 13fl oz/a DEF

Conventional Mummyberry and Botrytis Control in Blueberry - Skagit Valley Mummy berry strikes Trt Treatment flowers/leave/plot flowers/leaves/plant berries/plant Botrytis on berries No. Name 3-May 3-May 25-Jun 25-Jun 1UTC 13.5a 1.9 a 17.8 a 1.3 b 2Chlo/Ind/Prol/Swi/Pri/Abou/Elev 0.8e 0.1 d 0.3 c 0.5 b 3Meteor 1.8de 0.3cd 3.3c 0.5b 4Topsin M/Meteor 4.5b-e 0.7bcd 1.3c 1.8b 5Torino SC 5.3b-e 0.7bcd 8.3bc 4.3a 6Torino SC 9.3abc 1.2abc 13.8ab 0.5b 7Torino SC 9.3abc 1.3ab 8bc 2.3ab 8Kenja 400 SC 7.5a-e 1 abc 4.5 c 2 ab 9Kenja 400 SC 6.5a-e 0.9 bcd 6.5 bc 2 ab 10Switch 9.8ab 1.3 ab 0.5 c 1 b 11Ken/Ken/Ken/Ken/Omg/Omg 8.5a-d 1.1 abc 5.3 bc 0.8 b 12Chlor/Ind/Ind/Switch 0.8e 0.1 d 2.8 c 1 b 13Indar/Indar/Pristine/Switch 3.3b-e 0.5 bcd 1.5 c 1 b 14OSO 5% 2.3cde 0.3 cd 2.8 c 1.3 b 15OSO 5% 2.3cde 0.3 cd 2.3 c 2.8 ab

Conventional Mummyberry and Botrytis Control in Blueberry - Skagit Valley ranked by strikes on leaves and flowers per plot Mummy berry strikes Trt Treatment flowers/leave/plot flowers/leaves/plant berries/plant Botrytis on berries No. Name 3-May 3-May 25-Jun 25-Jun 2 Chlo/Ind/Prol/Swi/Pri/Abou/Elev 0.8e 0.1 d 0.3 c 0.5 b 12 Chlor/Ind/Ind/Switch 0.8e 0.1 d 2.8 c 1.0 b 3 Meteor 1.8de 0.3cd 3.3c 0.5b 14 OSO 5% 2.3cde 0.3 cd 2.8 c 1.3 b 15 OSO 5% 2.3cde 0.3 cd 2.3 c 2.8 ab 13 Indar/Indar/Pristine/Switch 3.3b-e 0.5 bcd 1.5 c 1.0 b 4 Topsin M/Meteor 4.5b-e 0.7bcd 1.3c 1.8b 5 Torino SC 5.3b-e 0.7bcd 8.3bc 4.3a 9 Kenja 400 SC 6.5a-e 0.9 bcd 6.5 bc 2.0 ab 8 Kenja 400 SC 7.5a-e 1.0 abc 4.5 c 2.0 ab 11 Ken/Ken/Ken/Ken/Omg/Omg 8.5a-d 1.1 abc 5.3 bc 0.8 b 6 Torino SC 9.3abc 1.2abc 13.8ab 0.5b 7 Torino SC 9.3abc 1.3ab 8.0bc 2.3ab 10 Switch 9.8ab 1.3 ab 0.5 c 1.0 b 1 UTC 13.5a 1.9 a 17.8 a 1.3 b

Conventional Mummyberry and Botrytis Control in Blueberry - Skagit Valley Ranked by strikes on fruit Mummy berry strikes Trt Treatment flowers/leave/plot flowers/leaves/plant berries/plant Botrytis on berries No. Name 3-May 3-May 25-Jun 25-Jun 2 Chlo/Ind/Prol/Swi/Pri/Abou/Elev 0.8e 0.1d 0.3 c 0.5 b 10 Switch 9.8ab 1.3ab 0.5 c 1.0 b 4 Topsin M/Meteor 4.5b-e 0.7bcd 1.3 c 1.8 b 13 Indar/Indar/Pristine/Switch 3.3b-e 0.5bcd 1.5 c 1.0 b 15 OSO 5% 2.3cde 0.3cd 2.3 c 2.8 ab 12 Chlor/Ind/Ind/Switch 0.8e 0.1d 2.8 c 1.0 b 14 OSO 5% 2.3cde 0.3cd 2.8 c 1.3 b 3 Meteor 1.8de 0.3cd 3.3 c 0.5 b 8 Kenja 400 SC 7.5a-e 1.0abc 4.5 c 2.0 ab 11 Ken/Ken/Ken/Ken/Omg/Omg 8.5a-d 1.1abc 5.3 bc 0.8 b 9 Kenja 400 SC 6.5a-e 0.9bcd 6.5 bc 2.0 ab 7 Torino SC 9.3abc 1.3ab 8.0bc 2.3 ab 5 Torino SC 5.3b-e 0.7bcd 8.3bc 4.3 a 6 Torino SC 9.3abc 1.2abc 13.8ab 0.5 b 1 UTC 13.5a 1.9a 17.8 a 1.3 b

Conventional Mummyberry and Botrytis Control in Blueberry - Skagit Valley Ranked by Botrytis on fruit Mummy berry strikes Trt Treatment flowers/leave/plot flowers/leaves/plant berries/plant Botrytis on berries No. Name 3-May 3-May 25-Jun 25-Jun 2 Chlo/Ind/Prol/Swi/Pris/Abou/Elev 0.8e 0.1d 0.3 c 0.5 b 3 Meteor 1.8de 0.3cd 3.3 c 0.5 b 6 Torino SC 9.3abc 1.2abc 13.8ab 0.5b 11 Ken/Ken/Ken/Ken/Omg/Omg 8.5a-d 1.1abc 5.3 bc 0.8 b 10 Switch 9.8ab 1.3ab 0.5 c 1.0 b 12 Chlor/Ind/Ind/Switch 0.8e 0.1d 2.8 c 1.0 b 13 Indar/Indar/Pristine/Switch 3.3b-e 0.5bcd 1.5 c 1.0 b 1 UTC 13.5a 1.9a 17.8 a 1.3 b 14 OSO 5% 2.3cde 0.3cd 2.8 c 1.3 b 4 Topsin M/Meteor 4.5b-e 0.7bcd 1.3c 1.8b 8 Kenja 400 SC 7.5a-e 1.0abc 4.5 c 2.0 ab 9 Kenja 400 SC 6.5a-e 0.9bcd 6.5 bc 2.0 ab 7 Torino SC 9.3abc 1.3ab 8.0bc 2.3ab 15 OSO 5% 2.3cde 0.3cd 2.3 c 2.8 ab 5 Torino SC 5.3b-e 0.7bcd 8.3bc 4.3a

Orange means commerical level control Black means moderate efficacy Light blue means lack of efficacy. Trt Treatment Form Form Rate # of No. Name Conc Unit Rate Unit Applications 1 UTC 2 Chlorothalonil 6LB/GAL 32fl oz/a A 2 Indar 2F 2LB/GAL 6fl oz/a B 2 Proline 4LB/GAL 5.7fl oz/a C 2 Switch 62 WG 62%AW/W 11oz/a D 2 Pristine 38% 18oz/a E 2 Abound 2.08LB/GAL 10fl oz/a F 2 Elevate 50% 1.5lb/a F 3 Meteor 4LB/GAL 32oz/a ABCDEF 4 Topsin M 70% 1.5lb/a ABCDEF 4 Meteor 4LB/GAL 32oz/a ABCDEF 5 Torino SC 10% 3.4fl oz/a ABCDEF 6 Torino SC 10% 5fl oz/a ABCDEF 7 Torino SC 10% 6.5fl oz/a ABCDEF 8 Kenja 400 SC 400g/L 13.5fl oz/a ABCD 9 Kenja 400 SC 400g/L 15.5fl oz/a ABCD 10 Switch 62.5% 11oz/a ABCD 11 Kenja 400 SC 400g/L 13.5fl oz/a ABCD 11 Omega 500g/L 1.25fl oz/a EF 12 Chlorothalonil 6LB/GAL 32fl oz/a A 12 Indar 2F 2LB/GAL 6fl oz/a BC 12 Switch 62.5% 14oz wt/a D 13 Indar 2F 2LB/GAL 6fl oz/a AB 13 Pristine 38% 20oz/a C 13 Switch 62.5% 14oz wt/a D 14 OSO 5% 5% 13fl oz/a DEF 15OSO 5% 5% 6.5fl oz/a DEF

Some thoughts about mummy berry. A Meteor (iprodione) treatment was effective in Trial 1, but a Rovral (iprodione) treatment was not that effective in Trial 2. Does not make sense. Oso was not very effective in the organic trial but was effective in the conventional trial. Fracture was more effective in the conventional trial than the organic trial. Products that were most effective Meteor, Proline, Propulse, OSO, Luna Tranquility, Indar/Pristine and some program treatments. Topguard was interesting. Group 3 Indar/Orbit/Proline Products that did not work well Captan, Rovral, Torino (not registered on blueberry). Kenja was intermediate first trial against mummy berry.

Some thoughts on botrytis Pressure was low, which limits the conclusions we can draw. Products that did not provide a high level of control included Fracture, Topguard (flutriafol), chlorothalonil, the low rate of Oso and the low and intermediate rates of Torino. Products providing better control (remember this is a location without resistance Meteor, Luna Tranquility, Propulse, Proline, Captan, Switch, Pristine and programs that contain these products.

We did a botrytis trial on blackberry very high pressure botrytis crop. Trial was in Skagit. Important point resistance to iprodione, cyprodinil, fenhexamid and boscalid at this location. I fear this trial may be emblematic of what could happen in bad botrytis year in fields with fungicide resistance.

Blackberry Botrytis Efficacy Trial - Skagit Valley - 2016 Trt Treatment Form Form Rate Appl 9/6/2016 No. Name Conc Unit Rate Unit Code infected berries per plot 8 Fontelis 20% 20fl oz/a ABCDEFGH 74.5d 12 Luna Tranquility 4.16LBA/GAL 18fl oz/a ABF 78.0cd 12 CAPTAN 80%W/W 2.5lb/a DE 12 SERENADE OPTI 26.2%W/W 20oz/a C 10 Luna Tranquility 4.16LBA/GAL 18fl oz/a ABCDEFGH 89.3cd 2 OMEGA 4.17LB/GAL 1.25pt/a ABCDEFGH 102.0cd 11 Luna Tranquility 4.16LBA/GAL 18fl oz/a ABE 105.0cd 11 CAPTAN 80%W/W 2.5lb/a CD 11 SERENADE OPTI 26.2%W/W 20oz/a F 9 Kenja 400GA/L 15.5fl oz/a ABCDEFGH 118.5bcd 4 CAPTAN 80%W/W 2.5lb/a ABCDEFGH 121.8bc 6 PRISTINE- R 38%W/W 23oz/a ABCDEFGH 150.5ab 5 ELEVATE - R 50%W/W 1.5lb/a ABCDEFGH 151.5ab 3 SWITCH -R 62.5%W/W 14oz/a ABCDEFGH 157.3ab 1 Untreated 169.5a 7 IPRODIONE - R 4% 1pt/a ABCDEFGH 185.0a