Journal of Nanosciences: Current Research

Similar documents
Effect of Inocucor on strawberry plants growth and production

Review for Lab 1 Artificial Selection

Seed Spacing Performance Of Common Row Crop Planters With Oil Seed Sunflowers

(36) PROHEXADIONE-CALCIUM AFFECTS SHOOT GROWTH AND YIELD OF LEMON, ORANGE AND AVOCADO DIFFERENTLY

Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Ovomucin and the Functional and Structural Characteristics of Peptides in the Hydrolysates

Missing value imputation in SAS: an intro to Proc MI and MIANALYZE

A latent class approach for estimating energy demands and efficiency in transport:

Gail E. Potter, Timo Smieszek, and Kerstin Sailer. April 24, 2015

Update to A Comprehensive Look at the Empirical Performance of Equity Premium Prediction

The aim of the thesis is to determine the economic efficiency of production factors utilization in S.C. AGROINDUSTRIALA BUCIUM S.A.

COMPARISON OF SEEDING RATES AND COATING ON SEEDLING COUNT, ROOT LENGTH, ROOT WEIGHT AND SHOOT WEIGHT OF CRIMSON CLOVER

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

WINE GRAPE TRIAL REPORT

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

Return to wine: A comparison of the hedonic, repeat sales, and hybrid approaches

Title: Control of Wild Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in 'Jubilee' Sweet Corn in the Willamette Valley, 1987.

Volunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat year two. Mark Thorne, Henry Wetzel, Drew Lyon, Tim Waters

PSYC 6140 November 16, 2005 ANOVA output in R

Rheological and physicochemical studies on emulsions formulated with chitosan previously dispersed in aqueous solutions of lactic acid

Pitfalls for the Construction of a Welfare Indicator: An Experimental Analysis of the Better Life Index

1. Continuing the development and validation of mobile sensors. 3. Identifying and establishing variable rate management field trials

Credit Supply and Monetary Policy: Identifying the Bank Balance-Sheet Channel with Loan Applications. Web Appendix

Evaluation of Organic Cucumber, and Summer and Winter Squash Varieties for Certified Organic Production Neely- Kinyon Trial, 2005

Climate change may alter human physical activity patterns

A Hedonic Analysis of Retail Italian Vinegars. Summary. The Model. Vinegar. Methodology. Survey. Results. Concluding remarks.

SpatialAnalyzer Geometry Fitting Test

Model for Predicting. Richard Buchner, Steve Lindow, Jim Adaskaveg, Cyndi Gilles and Renee Koutsoukis

Appendix A. Table A.1: Logit Estimates for Elasticities

Internet Appendix for Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation? *

wine 1 wine 2 wine 3 person person person person person

A Comparison of Approximate Bayesian Bootstrap and Weighted Sequential Hot Deck for Multiple Imputation

Business Statistics /82 Spring 2011 Booth School of Business The University of Chicago Final Exam

Handling Missing Data. Ashley Parker EDU 7312

Produce basic hot and cold desserts

7 th Annual Conference AAWE, Stellenbosch, Jun 2013

Evaluate Characteristics of new cherry tomato varieties of Mahasarakham University

The Wurst Of Lucky Peach: A Treasury Of Encased Meat By Chris Ying, the editors of Lucky Peach

February 26, The results below are generated from an R script.

Plant growth-promoting potentials of sweet sorghum bagasse compost. S. Gopalakrishnan Principal Scientist (Microbiology) ICRISAT DO NOT COPY

Fungicide control of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot on grape: 2014 field trial

IMPROVING THE PROCEDURE FOR NUTRIENT SAMPLING IN STONE FRUIT TREES

Flexible Imputation of Missing Data

November K. J. Martijn Cremers Lubomir P. Litov Simone M. Sepe

Multiple Imputation for Missing Data in KLoSA

Supporing Information. Modelling the Atomic Arrangement of Amorphous 2D Silica: Analysis

CENTER TRT EVALUATION PLAN. Kaiser Permanente Worksite Cafeteria Menu Labeling. Evaluation Plan:

CONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins. Interpretive Summary

RELATIVE EFFICIENCY OF ESTIMATES BASED ON PERCENTAGES OF MISSINGNESS USING THREE IMPUTATION NUMBERS IN MULTIPLE IMPUTATION ANALYSIS ABSTRACT

Missing Data Treatments

Cointegration Analysis of Commodity Prices: Much Ado about the Wrong Thing? Mindy L. Mallory and Sergio H. Lence September 17, 2010

Protest Campaigns and Movement Success: Desegregating the U.S. South in the Early 1960s

MAIZE (ZEA MAYS) LEAF ANGLE AND EMERGENCE AS AFFECTED BY SEED ORIENTATION AT PLANTING

Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Jg., Heft 5, 2015, Online- Anhang

Final Exam Financial Data Analysis (6 Credit points/imp Students) March 2, 2006

Regeneration plantlets from somatic embryos of tea plant (Camellia sinensis L.)

COMPARISON OF CORE AND PEEL SAMPLING METHODS FOR DRY MATTER MEASUREMENT IN HASS AVOCADO FRUIT

Use of Plant Growth Regulators to Increase Fruit Set, Fruit Size and Yield and to Manipulate Vegetative and Floral Shoot Growth

Online Appendix to. Are Two heads Better Than One: Team versus Individual Play in Signaling Games. David C. Cooper and John H.

From VOC to IPA: This Beer s For You!

Internet Appendix. For. Birds of a feather: Value implications of political alignment between top management and directors

rciion egelaihe D Sweet corn varieties tested

Growth Promoting Substances and Mineral Elements in Desiccated Coconut Mills (DC) Coconut Water

Online Appendix to The Effect of Liquidity on Governance

Gasoline Empirical Analysis: Competition Bureau March 2005

Consumer Responses to Food Products Produced Near the Fukushima Nuclear Plant

The SAS System 09:38 Wednesday, December 2, The CANDISC Procedure

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

Nothing less - just the best!

Flowering and Fruiting Morphology of Hardy Kiwifruit, Actinidia arguta

Tolerance of Arbequina Olives (Olea europaea Arbequina) to Mission Herbicide.

Table S1. Countries and years in sample.

Labor Supply of Married Couples in the Formal and Informal Sectors in Thailand

The Effectiveness of Homemade Egg Substitutes Compared to Egg Beaters. Nicole Myer F&N 453-Food Chemistry November 21, 2005

Prepare, cook and finish complex bread and dough

Research Report: Use of Geotextiles to Reduce Freeze Injury in Ontario Vineyards

Appendix Table A1 Number of years since deregulation

NIMITZ NEMATICIDE FIELD TRIALS

2010 Cotton Harvest Aids

Forestry, Leduc, AB, T9E 7C5, Canada. Agriculture/Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada. *

Tea Research Foundation Central Africa

Towards a numerical phenotyping for: Phenology Berry enological traits

Practical Aspects of Crop Load and Canopy Management

Regional and harvest date relationships with storage quality of Honeycrisp apples

Statistical Analysis of Yeast Nutrient in Hard Cider Brewing

Treatments protocol # Color Materials Timing FP/A Tol 1 W Untreated Y 2 OD Rovral 50WP

Blackberry Growth Cycle and New Varieties from the University of Arkansas. Alejandra A. Salgado and John R. Clark March 13 th, 2015 Virginia

Tariff vs non tariff barriers in seafood trade

Freestanding SL1000-IN

Comparison of CPPU, Dormex, CAN17 and Other Treatments in Dormant Season Applications on Sweet Cherry in 2006

Karrikins delay soybean seed germination by mediating abscisic acid and gibberellin biogenesis under shaded conditions

ITC (HS), 2012 SCHEDULE 1 IMPORT POLICY CHAPTER 20 PREPARATIONS OF VEGETABLES, FRUIT, NUTS OR OTHER PARTS OF PLANTS

DIR2017. Training Neural Rankers with Weak Supervision. Mostafa Dehghani, Hamed Zamani, Aliaksei Severyn, Sascha Rothe, Jaap Kamps, and W.

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

The impact of a continuous care intervention for treatment of type 2 diabetes on health care system utilization

Figure S2. Measurement locations for meteorological stations. (data made available by KMI:

Flexible Working Arrangements, Collaboration, ICT and Innovation

Reproductive performance of Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot (Vitis vinifera L.) is affected when grafted to rootstocks

Consumers Willingness to Pay for Geographical Indication Labeling of Thailand s Hom Mali Rice

The Effect of Milk Fat Percentage on Milk Gummy Snacks

EFFECT OF COMBINED NITROGEN ON GROWTH AND NODULATION OF TWO MUNGBEAN (VIGNA RADIATA [L.] WILCZEK) CULTIVARS

Transcription:

ent Research rrjournal of Nanosciences: Cu Journal of Nanosciences: Current Research Keita et al., J Nanosci Curr Res 2018, 3:2 DOI: 10.4172/2572-0813.1000123 Supplementary File Open Access SAS Data Error Mean Square 0.088276 Dependent Variable: shoot Model 7 6.65109498 0.95015643 10.76 0.0094 Error 5 0.44138194 0.08827639 Corrected Total 12 7.09247692 Dependent Variable: leaves R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE Shoot Mean 0.937768 14.16902 0.297113 2.096923 Model 7 0.47439359 0.06777051 21.88 0.0018 Error 5 0.01548333 0.00309667 Corrected Total 12 0.48987692 Trt 5 2.47747692 0.49549538 5.61 0.0407 Season 2 4.17361806 2.08680903 23.64 0.0028 R-Square Coeff VarRoot MSE Root MSE Leaves Mean 0.968393 10.84588 0.055648 0.513077 Trt 5 2.83850972 0.56770194 6.43 0.0310 Season 2 4.17361806 2.08680903 23.64 0.0028 Trt 5 0.258294 0.051659 16.68 0.0039 t Tests (LSD) for shoot Season 2 0.2161 0.10805 34.89 0.0012 Trt 5 0.220517 0.044103 14.24 0.0056 Season 2 0.2161 0.10805 34.89 0.0012 t Tests (LSD) for leaves

Page 2 of 5 250-750 -0.04-0.2423 0.1623 250-500 -0.03333-0.19851 0.13184 Error Mean Square 0.003097 Trt Comparison Means Difference Between 95% Confidence Limits 0-50 0.19167 0.06108 0.32225 *** 0-1000 0.22667 0.10987 0.34346 *** 0-750 0.35667 0.19149 0.52184 *** 0-500 0.36333 0.24654 0.48013 *** 0-250 0.39667 0.23149 0.56184 *** 50-0 -0.19167-0.32225-0.06108 *** 50-1000 0.035-0.09558 0.16558 50-750 0.165-0.0102 0.3402 50-500 0.17167 0.04108 0.30225 *** 50-250 0.205 0.0298 0.3802 *** Dependent Variable: width Model 7 0.162279 0.023183 7.81 0.0189 Error 5 0.014844 0.002969 Corrected Total 12 0.177123 1000-0 -0.22667-0.34346-0.10987 *** 1000-50 -0.035-0.16558 0.09558 1000-750 0.13-0.03518 0.29518 1000-500 0.13667 0.01987 0.25346 *** 1000-250 0.17 0.00482 0.33518 *** 750-0 -0.35667-0.52184-0.19149 *** 750-50 -0.165-0.3402 0.0102 750-1000 -0.13-0.29518 0.03518 750-500 0.00667-0.15851 0.17184 t Tests (LSD) for width Error Mean Square 0.002969 750-250 0.04-0.1623 0.2423 500-0 -0.36333-0.48013-0.24654 *** 500-50 -0.17167-0.30225-0.04108 *** 500-1000 -0.13667-0.25346-0.01987 *** 500-750 -0.00667-0.17184 0.15851 Trt Comparison Difference Between Means 95% Confidence Limits 500-250 0.03333-0.13184 0.19851 250-0 -0.39667-0.56184-0.23149 *** 250-50 -0.205-0.3802-0.0298 *** 250-1000 -0.17-0.33518-0.00482 *** 50-0 0.01167-0.11619 0.13953 50-750 0.155-0.01654 0.32654 50-1000 0.165 0.03714 0.29286 *** 50-250 0.225 0.05346 0.39654 *** 50-500 0.26167 0.13381 0.38953 ***

Page 3 of 5 0-50 -0.01167-0.13953 0.11619 0-750 0.14333-0.0184 0.30507 0-1000 0.15333 0.03897 0.2677 *** 0-250 0.21333 0.0516 0.37507 *** 0-500 0.25 0.13564 0.36436 *** 750-50 -0.155-0.32654 0.01654 750-0 -0.14333-0.30507 0.0184 750-1000 0.01-0.15173 0.17173 Dependent Variable: root Model 7 5.80946 0.829923 6.51 0.0279 Error 5 0.637571 0.127514 Corrected Total 12 6.447031 R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE Root Mean 0.901106 21.48166 0.357091 1.662308 750-250 0.07-0.12808 0.26808 750-500 0.10667-0.05507 0.2684 1000-50 -0.165-0.29286-0.03714 *** 1000-0 -0.15333-0.2677-0.03897 *** 1000-750 -0.01-0.17173 0.15173 Trt 5 3.181447 0.636289 4.99 0.0512 Season 2 2.628013 1.314006 10.3 0.0168 1000-250 0.06-0.10173 0.22173 1000-500 0.09667-0.0177 0.21103 250-50 -0.225-0.39654-0.05346 *** 250-0 -0.21333-0.37507-0.0516 *** 250-750 -0.07-0.26808 0.12808 Trt 5 2.785929 0.557186 4.37 0.0657 Season 2 2.628013 1.314006 10.3 0.0168 250-1000 -0.06-0.22173 0.10173 250-500 0.03667-0.12507 0.1984 500-50 -0.26167-0.38953-0.13381 *** 500-0 -0.25-0.36436-0.13564 *** 500-750 -0.10667-0.2684 0.05507 500-1000 -0.09667-0.21103 0.0177 500-250 -0.03667-0.1984 0.12507 t Tests (LSD) for root the experimentwise error rate Error Mean Square 0.127514 Class Levels Values Trt Comparison Difference Between Means 95% Confidence Limits 0-50 0.0283-0.8096 0.8663 0-750 0.6433-0.4166 1.7033 0-1000 0.6533-0.0962 1.4028 0-250 0.9933-0.0666 2.0533 0-500 1.2567 0.5072 2.0062 *** 50-0 -0.0283-0.8663 0.8096 50-750 0.615-0.5092 1.7392 50-1000 0.625-0.213 1.463

Page 4 of 5 50-250 0.965-0.1592 2.0892 Corrected Total 12 131.9277 50-500 1.2283 0.3904 2.0663 *** 750-0 -0.6433-1.7033 0.4166 750-50 -0.615-1.7392 0.5092 750-1000 0.01-1.0499 1.0699 R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE Rate Mean 0.899659-32.0982 1.627131-5.06923 750-250 0.35-0.9482 1.6482 750-500 0.6133-0.4466 1.6733 1000-0 -0.6533-1.4028 0.0962 1000-50 -0.625-1.463 0.213 1000-750 -0.01-1.0699 1.0499 Trt 5 73.00769 14.60154 5.52 0.0421 Season 2 45.68222 22.84111 8.63 0.0239 1000-250 0.34-0.7199 1.3999 1000-500 0.6033-0.1462 1.3528 250-0 -0.9933-2.0533 0.0666 250-50 -0.965-2.0892 0.1592 250-750 -0.35-1.6482 0.9482 Trt 5 50.40722 10.08144 3.81 0.0843 Season 2 45.68222 22.84111 8.63 0.0239 250-1000 -0.34-1.3999 0.7199 250-500 0.2633-0.7966 1.3233 500-0 -1.2567-2.0062-0.5072 *** 500-50 -1.2283-2.0663-0.3904 *** 500-750 -0.6133-1.6733 0.4466 500-1000 -0.6033-1.3528 0.1462 500-250 -0.2633-1.3233 0.7966 t Tests (LSD) for rate Error Mean Square 2.647556 Trt Comparison Difference Between Means 95% Confidence Limits 0-50 2.567-1.252 6.385 0-1000 4.233 0.818 7.648 *** 0-500 5.133 1.718 8.548 *** 0-250 6.567 1.737 11.396 *** 0-750 7.467 2.637 12.296 *** 50-0 -2.567-6.385 1.252 Dependent Variable: rate Model 7 118.6899 16.9557 6.4 0.0288 50-1000 1.667-2.152 5.485 50-500 2.567-1.252 6.385 50-250 4-1.123 9.123 50-750 4.9-0.223 10.023 Error 5 13.23778 2.647556

Page 5 of 5 1000-0 -4.233-7.648-0.818 *** 1000-50 -1.667-5.485 2.152 1000-500 0.9-2.515 4.315 1000-250 2.333-2.496 7.163 1000-750 3.233-1.596 8.063 500-0 -5.133-8.548-1.718 *** 500-50 -2.567-6.385 1.252 500-1000 -0.9-4.315 2.515 500-250 1.433-3.396 6.263 500-750 2.333-2.496 7.163 250-0 -6.567-11.396-1.737 *** 250-50 -4-9.123 1.123 250-1000 -2.333-7.163 2.496 250-500 -1.433-6.263 3.396 250-750 0.9-5.015 6.815 750-0 -7.467-12.296-2.637 *** 750-50 -4.9-10.023 0.223 750-1000 -3.233-8.063 1.596 750-500 -2.333-7.163 2.496 10 1 500 1-0.00000816 11 1 500 2 0.00000278 12 1 500 3-0.00000816 13 1 750 1-0.0000384 14 1 750 2-0.0000195 15 1 750 3-0.000108253 16 1 1000 1-0.000108253 17 1 1000 2-0.0000547 18 1 1000 3-0.0000384 19 2 0 1 0.00000886 20 2 0 2 0.00000886 21 2 0 3 0.00000886 22 2 50 1 0.0000182 23 2 50 2 0.000012 24 2 50 3 0.0000125 25 2 250 1 0.0000078 26 2 250 2 0.00000848 27 2 250 3 0.0000092 28 2 500 1 0.000000835 750-250 -0.9-6.815 5.015 Obs Bacteria Treatments Replication Inhibition The SAS System Obs Bacteria Treatments Replication Inhibition 1 1 0 1 0.00000886 2 1 0 2 0.0000204 3 1 0 3 0.00000886 4 1 50 1 0.0000123 5 1 50 2 0.0000219 6 1 50 3 0.0000123 29 2 500 2 -.000007460 30 2 500 3 -.000008860 31 2 750 1 -.000028300 32 2 750 2 -.000093100 33 2 750 3 -.000123415 34 2 1000 1 -.000032600 35 2 1000 2 -.000042100 36 2 1000 3 -.000034800 7 1 250 1 0.00000884 8 1 250 2 0.00000846 9 1 250 3 0.00000884