Wholesale Protection 2018 A REPORT ON ALCOHOL WHOLESALER STATE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS

Similar documents
Portable Convenient Red/ Orange Vegetable Options for K12

January OAK WEALTH ADVISORS 2019 ABLE ACCOUNT COMPARISON MATRIX AK AL AR AZ CA ABLE Contact Information

A Step Ahead: Creating Focus for Your DTC Strategy. Steve Gross, Wine Institute VP of State Relations

RAW MILK REGULATIONS AND STATUTES 50 State Compilation

Privacy. Terms and Conditions

Homer and Rhonda Henson

LOUISVILLE PECAN COMPANY

Need it faster? Use 2-day or overnight shipping! We re sorry, due to state laws we are unable to expedite shipping to AZ, MA or NJ.

Emerging Practices: Breweries/Distilleries. Mike McCann Spencer Fane LLP spencerfane.com

Updated: Hickory Harvest Expands Recall of Certain Sunflower Kernel Products Because of Possible Listeria Monocytogenes

Food Manufacturing in New Jersey Industry Report FOOD MANUFACTURING IN NEW JERSEY

egrid2012 Version 1.0 Year 2009 Summary Tables

DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER WINE SHIPPING REPORT

Hospital Acquired Infections Report. Disparities National Coordinating Center

An Annual Report by ShipCompliant and Wines & Vines. Direct to consumer. Wine Shipping Report

G I F T GA L L E RY. The Art of the Gift

Cyndi Dancy, Research Director I web

COOKIES AND SWEET BISCUITS

Toward Liquor Domination

Chapter 80 of the laws of 1985 (including amendments such as the wine marketing fund 3 A)

Zoning, Manufacturing, and Alcohol, OH MY! Nancy Palmer Executive Director, Georgia Craft Brewers Guild

John C. Bruhn Dairy Foods Processing Specialist Dairy Research and Information Center Food Science & Technology University of California Davis, CA

NABCA Releases Control States Nine-Liter Spirits Sales for March Control State results for nine-liter beverage sales for March 2017

Subject: ALFOODACT River Ranch Fresh Foods, LLC, of Salinas, California Recalls Certain Bagged Salads

NABCA Releases Control States Nine-Liter Spirits Sales for September

Distilled Spirits Council

2:17-cv AJT-SDD Doc # 1 Filed 01/20/17 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

MODERNIZATION OF OKLAHOMA S ALCOHOL LAWS: READY OR NOT HERE IT COMES! Presented by the Oklahoma ABLE Commission

Healthy Food Access Policy JOHN WEIDMAN THE FOOD TRUST

Prospective Plantings

Access to Recycling & Composting: Paper Food Service Items

NABCA Releases Control States Nine-Liter Spirits Sales for December

MEXICO WATER REPORT. Bottled Water in Mexico: Second & Growing

COMPLIANCE WORKSHOP REVIEW

PASO ROBLES WINE COUNTRY ALLIANCE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR TEMPORARY APPLICATIONS

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS FISCAL NOTE. HOUSE BILL NO. 466 PRINTERS NO. 521 PRIME SPONSOR: Turzai

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Dan Roehl. National Restaurant Association

Joseph A. Fiola, Ph.D. Specialist in Viticulture and Small Fruit Western MD Research & Education Center Keedysville Road Keedysville, MD

October 27, p.m.

WE DELIVER A Comprehensive Economic Impact Study of the U.S. Foodservice Distribution Industry.

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BEER TOURISM IN KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN

State Of California Department Of Alcoholic Beverage Control 3927 Lennane Drive, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95834

Interactive Map of the 13 colonies

A. FEDERAL / NATIONAL / INTERNATIONAL B. THE COURTS C. THE STATES. Distribution and Franchise:

Homer ORGANIZATION bill analysis 5/6/2003 (CSHB 2593 by Eissler) Consumption of wine for sale at wineries

An Economic Analysis of Producing Carrots in the Red River Valley

Recent legislation gives craft beer a boost By Patrick Graves

Raymond James 33 rd Annual Institutional Investors Conference March 5, DineEquity, Inc. All rights reserved.

WE RE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER. Why You Should Consider Co-Branding Your Great American Cookies Franchise

Rural Vermont s Raw Milk Report to the Legislature

Canada-EU Free Trade Agreement (CETA)

E0168: Hazard Mitigation: Crew Leader 5/22/2017 5/25/2017 Emmitsburg MD Mitigation

Does Consumer Sentiment Predict Regional Consumption?

North Carolina Exports by Quarter (in constant 2Q 2013 dollars)

Global Considerations

Release #2461 Release Date: Thursday, February 20, 2014

Take a Closer Look at Today s Polystyrene Packaging

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement

2011 Regional Wine Grape Marketing and Price Outlook

ENTERING THE U.S. WINE MARKET ISRAEL WINE EXPO

WEST PALM BEACH, FL: VENDOR APPLICATION Fill out this application and Fax to:

and the World Market for Wine The Central Valley is a Central Part of the Competitive World of Wine What is happening in the world of wine?

Restaurant Success Orientation Mobile Food Businesses

Social Studies 7 Civics Ch 2.2 : Settlement, Culture, and Government of the Colonies PP

Outline. o Global Dairy Overview o U.S Milk Production o Dairy Product Production, Stocks, Trade o Outlook. Copyright 2017 Daily Dairy Report, Inc.

MILLENNIAL CONSUMERS SEEK NEW TASTES, WILLING TO PAY A PREMIUM FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES. Nielsen Releases Most Comprehensive Study To Date

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION BEER

May 11, The Honorable Tom Vilsack Secretary of Agriculture U.S. Department of Agriculture 1400 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C.

Substitution in electricity generation: A state level analysis of structural change from hydraulic fracturing technology

DATA AND ASSUMPTIONS (TAX CALCULATOR REVISION, MARCH 2017)

Starbucks BRAZIL. Presentation Outline

AMERICAN REVOLUTION VOL. 1 Stamp Act

Virginia Wine Board Marketing Presentation. Omni Hotel Charlottesville, VA November 7, 2016

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF WINE AND WINE GRAPES ON THE STATE OF TEXAS 2015

The Contribution made by Beer to the European Economy. Czech Republic - January 2016

Work Sample (Minimum) for 10-K Integration Assignment MAN and for suppliers of raw materials and services that the Company relies on.

What Does Being a Global Player Mean to the U.S. Dairy Sector?

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE WINE AND GRAPE INDUSTRY IN CANADA 2015

The Evolution of BC Liquor Laws

2015 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR WAGE BOARD HEARING: RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE FOR FAST FOOD WORKERS NFIB/NY STATE DIRECTOR MICHAEL DURANT JUNE 22, 2015

As Serious a Threat as HLB: The Collapsing Orange Juice Market

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

Consumer and Market Insights Symposium James Omond Lawyer & trade mark attorney, Omond & Co Board Member, Wine Victoria and WFA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Being a member of the OWA is the means by which true membership in the Oregon wine industry must be defined. - David Adelsheim, Adelsheim Vineyard

How Rest Area Commercialization Will Devastate the Economic Contributions of Interstate Businesses. Acknowledgements

BILL NUMBER: AB 727 BILL TEXT AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 25, 2011 FEBRUARY 17, 2011

november 2014 rubicon member shipment

Bob Dickey. Bob Dickey. President, National Corn Growers Association Corn Grower from Laurel, Nebraska

Illinois Asphalt Pavement Association. March 12, 2013

IC Chapter 27. Artisan Distiller's Permit

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF WINE AND VINEYARDS IN NAPA COUNTY

CONSUMER TRENDS Pulses In India

Wholesale Distributors

Wholesale Distributors

BREWERS ASSOCIATION CRAFT BREWER DEFINITION UPDATE FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. December 18, 2018

Transcription:

Wholesale Protection 2018 A REPORT ON ALCOHOL WHOLESALER STATE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS Produced by The National Association of Wine Retailers January 8, 2018

Report Highlights 1. In the past five election cycles alcohol wholesalers have contributed $107 million to state political campaigns. 2. Wholesaler campaign contributions dwarf the combined contributions of all other sectors of the alcohol industry. 3. Wholesalers have dominated campaign contributions in each of the past five election cycles, with no other individual sector of the industry approaching their level of money spent. 4. State and national wholesaler trade associations do most of the political giving. 5. Of the top 20 campaign contributors from the alcohol wholesale sector, six are either CEOs of individual wholesalers or the individual wholesale company. 6. Over the past five election cycles, candidates in Washington,, Illinois, New York, California, Florida, Indiana, Michigan and Ohio have received the most campaign contributions from wholesalers. 7. Candidates and initiatives in Washington State, Virginia and Illinois received most wholesaler campaign contributions on a per capita basis. 8. governors and leaders of that state s legislature dominate the list of top recipients of wholesaler campaign contributions.

Introduction How much are alcohol wholesalers be willing to pay to keep in place a government mandated system that guaranteed their business is protected from free market competition, to assure innovations that challenged a protected business model are snuffed out before they can be deployed, or to assure the producers they represent are prevented by law from choosing to give their business to a competitor? This report answers that question to the tune of $107 million. Wholesale Protection 2018 examines the amount and type of campaign contributions American beer, wine and spirit wholesalers have given to state lawmakers over the past five election cycles. A regulatory system put in place over 80 years ago to address economic conditions in place over 100 years ago can unquestionably be deemed archaic. This is the situation in the American alcohol beverage marketplace today. Most states require alcohol producers to use a middleman wholesaler to distribute their products. Most states require retailers to only purchase from middlemen wholesalers. Franchise Laws in many states make it nearly impossible for producers to leave one distributor for another. Most states actually ban out-of-state retailers from shipping wine into a state on the premise that such normal commercial activity harms the three-tier system. All these and many other archaic and unjustified regulations and laws benefit a single sector of the alcohol industry: the middleman wholesaler. It should be no surprise that this middle tier of the alcohol beverage industry pays huge sums to lawmakers to keep their competitive advantage in place. We can assume that alcohol wholesalers don t make huge contributions to candidates for charitable reasons. And anyone who has ever listened to a state lawmaker, flush with wholesaler money, attempt to defend their votes to sustain the competitive advantage the laws and regulations of the states provide to wholesalers must assume it s not the strength of the wholesalers arguments that tend to win the day. When the 21 st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution repealed national prohibition, it also gave great latitude to the states to regulate the sale and distribution of alcohol. For this reason, nearly all laws and regulations concerning alcohol are made at the state level and not the federal level. Therefore, most campaign contributions and lobbying efforts attempting to impact those laws and regulations occur at the state level.

This report examines wholesaler contributions for the past five election cycles: 2007-2008, 2009-2010, 2011-2012, 2013-2014 and 2015-2016. The data used to compile this report was taken almost entirely from the Follow The Money website maintained by The National Institute on Money in State Politics. As noted on the Institute s website, The nonpartisan, nonprofit National Institute on Money in State Politics promotes an accountable democracy by compiling comprehensive campaign-donor, lobbyist, and other information from government disclosure agencies nationwide and making it freely available at FollowTheMoney.org. This report was written and compiled by the National Association of Wine Retailers. Tom Wark Executive Director

Total Campaign Contributions by Alcohol Industry Sector (2007-2016) During this period, beer, wine and spirit wholesalers have contributed to state political campaigns more than twice the amount contributed by wineries, distillers, brewers and retailers combined. Their $107 million in contributions just to state political campaigns does not include contributions to federal political campaigns nor state and federal lobbying expenses which together amount to many tens of millions more.

Campaign Contributions By Alcohol Industry Sector For the Past Five Election Cycles The domination in campaign contributions by wholesalers over the past five election cycles is notable for its consistency. During no election cycle did any of the other alcohol industry sectors come close to competing with the wholesaler sector either individually or combined. The spikes in wholesaler contributions during the 2012 and 2010 election cycles were due to wholesalers contributing millions of dollars in 2010 and 2011 to stop a state ballot proposition instituting alcohol regulatory reforms in Washington State. They failed to stop the proposition. This failure is notable insofar as the ultimate arbiter of whether or not the wholesalers would be protected was the public, not lawmakers.

Top 20 Individual Campaign Contributors Over the Past Five Election Cycles Top 20 Wholesaler Contributors to State Campaigns - Last 5 Election Cycles Contributor Total Contributions WINE & SPIRIT WHOLESALERS OF AMERICA $9,723,740 ASSOCIATED BEER DISTRIBUTORS OF ILLINOIS $5,919,878 SOUTHERN WINE & SPIRITS $4,007,364 WASHINGTON BEER & WINE DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION $3,686,049 NATIONAL BEER WHOLESALER ASSOCIATION $3,220,587 NAU III, JOHN LISTON (1) $3,182,327 WHOLESALE BEER & WINE ASSOCIATION OF OHIO $3,172,885 MICHIGAN BEER & WINE WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION $3,073,680 YOUNGS MARKET CO $2,921,222 VIRGINIA BEER WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION $2,526,001 WHOLESALE BEER DISTRIBUTORS OF TEXAS $2,471,108 ANDREWS, BARRY G (2) $2,082,135 CALIFORNIA BEER & BEVERAGE DISTRIBUTORS $1,951,007 VIRGINIA WINE WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION $1,791,858 NEW YORK STATE BEER WHOLESALERS ASSOCIATION $1,419,163 OREGON BEER & WINE DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION $1,389,587 BEER ALLIANCE OF TEXAS $1,336,825 ODOM SOUTHERN HOLDINGS LLC $1,274,500 REPUBLIC NATIONAL DISTRIBUTING CO $1,082,847 INDIANA BEVERAGE ALLIANCE $1,053,400 Of the top 20 campaign contributors over the past five election cycles, two are national trade associations, 12 are state trade associations, four are individual wholesalers and two are owners of individual wholesalers. (1) John Nau III is the President and CEO of Silver Eagle Distributors in, the largest ABInBev products distributor in. (2) Barry Andrews is the founder and CEO of Andrews Distributing, one of the largest Miller/Coors wholesalers in.

To Whom Do Wholesalers Give Campaign Contributions Partisan Breakdown of Wholesaler Campaign Contributions REPUBLICAN 60% DEMOCRATIC 40% Wholesaler Campaign Contributions By Type of Candidate INCUMBENT 76% OPEN SEATS 21% CHALLENGER The breakdown of contributions by party is notable for its relative parity. Wholesaler contributions by type of candidate receiving contributions heavily favor incumbents and are consistent with contribution habits in most other industries. 3%

Wholesaler Contributions By State and Election Cycle 2016 TOTAL 2014 TOTAL 2012 TOTAL 2010 TOTAL 2008 TOTALS 5-Cycle Totals Contrib. Per Capita AK 3,100 5,050 3,800 3,700 1,000 16,650 $0.02 AL 17,500 253,755 34,931 286,240 12,729 605,155 $0.12 AR 35,045 249,740 75,491 112,366 49,636 522,277 $0.17 AZ 45,744 102,804 40,578 106,115 116,219 411,460 $0.06 CA 663,362 1,239,927 1,101,238 1,266,937 1,111,749 5,383,213 $0.14 CO 3,809 10,900 17,050 18,855 3,710 54,324 $0.01 CT 56,550 88,118 23,610 16,179 3,210 187,667 $0.05 DE 32,850 40,975 38,250 31,025 59,000 202,100 $0.21 FL 672,887 993,351 921,311 1,335,592 754,448 4,677,589 $0.23 GA 428,241 965,741 451,607 1,097,937 419,903 3,363,428 $0.33 HI 1,200 2,575 2,000 1,000 0 6,775 $0.00 IA 183,275 125,150 161,430 118,215 96,661 684,730 $0.22 ID 36,300 68,625 34,286 51,225 25,762 216,198 $0.13 IL 1,678,361 1,599,128 2,093,573 1,396,230 1,689,155 8,456,449 $0.66 IN 913,687 589,459 710,341 448,474 784,114 3,446,073 $0.52 KS 203,666 129,115 111,419 70,224 52,720 567,144 $0.20 KY 117,102 78,800 113,000 80,300 155,794 544,996 $0.12 LA 522,736 25,387 341,119 43,759 371,599 1,304,601 $0.28 MA 436,950 339,447 229,730 1,375,652 169,625 2,551,404 $0.37 MD 113,260 235,503 10,750 217,439 7,340 584,292 $0.10 ME 44,055 49,950 23,756 55,925 574,518 748,204 $0.56 MI 752,902 789,969 478,350 722,365 526,841 3,270,427 $0.33 MN 111,350 56,100 72,430 76,250 38,975 355,105 $0.06 MO 514,149 291,634 251,246 54,592 150,577 1,262,198 $0.21 MS 142,050 1,000 104,250 5,250 86,650 339,200 $0.11 MT 28,210 7,070 25,720 9,250 11,860 82,110 $0.08 NC 534,711 535,063 655,088 405,494 244,873 2,375,229 $0.23 ND 9,779 3,300 18,650 2,150 9,770 43,649 $0.06 NE 102,560 141,657 56,755 140,038 19,870 460,881 $0.24 NH 45,900 19,500 57,500 41,625 69,600 234,125 $0.18 NJ 144,743 263,567 418,560 351,157 464,593 1,642,621 $0.18 NM 50,008 69,904 38,575 91,068 190,089 439,644 $0.21 NV 574,066 132,050 139,000 211,861 126,888 1,183,865 $0.40 NY 750,916 1,165,605 1,201,952 1,126,446 263,040 4,507,960 $0.23 OH 868,531 1,087,244 748,193 888,500 578,488 4,170,955 $0.36 OK 90,640 140,512 98,851 128,558 44,885 503,446 $0.13 OR 381,794 183,639 359,362 459,012 300,697 1,684,503 $0.41 PA 190,100 346,619 146,495 209,442 176,680 1,069,337 $0.08 RI 32,175 36,625 50,475 50,800 50,925 221,000 $0.21 SC 213,654 298,763 186,823 190,476 249,755 1,139,471 $0.23 SD 19,925 21,350 6,550 22,400 10,900 81,125 $0.09 TN 418,531 436,785 349,939 537,095 297,893 2,040,244 $0.31 TX 2,817,101 3,425,759 2,797,851 4,020,866 2,082,710 15,144,288 $0.54 UT 26,525 25,925 24,372 25,125 40,500 142,447 $0.05 VA 2,562,221 1,334,773 1,493,155 1,391,862 1,239,264 8,021,275 $0.95 VT 21,750 15,200 18,900 11,131 3,800 70,781 $0.11 WA 459,330 477,473 11,491,651 8,261,302 134,858 20,824,614 $2.86 WI 373,169 394,539 399,600 262,883 219,805 1,649,996 $0.29 WV 65,700 30,500 124,866 34,475 50,565 306,106 $0.17 WY 0 0 0 2,872 0 2,872 $0.00

TOTALS 18,512,169 18,925,627 28,354,427 27,867,734 14,144,243 107,804,200 What stands out most in the above table is the outsized contributions made to Washington State political campaigns by wholesalers. The enormous $2.86 per capita contributions is due entirely to the large amounts given by wholesalers to stop a ballot initiative in 2011. That initiative took alcohol sales out of the hands of the state government. Had contributions to Washington State political campaigns during the 2010 and 2012 election cycles only amounted to the highest amount given ($477K) during the other three election cycles represented here, the per capita contributions would be reduced to $0.32. This would put Washington State in the top quartile of states for wholesaler contributions. The top 10 states for per capita campaign contributions by alcohol wholesalers for the past five election cycles are: WA VA IL ME TX IN OR NV MA OH $2.86 $0.95 $0.66 $0.56 $0.54 $0.52 $0.41 $0.40 $0.37 $0.36

Top 15 Recipients of Alcohol Wholesaler Campaign Contributions During the Past Five Election Cycles Office Holder Rick Perry David Dewhurst III Joseph Strauss, III Greg Abbott William Howell Jerry Brown Nathan Deal Daniel Branch Richard Saslaw Andrew Cuomo Scott Walker Kay Bailey Hutchinson Robert McConnell Mitch Daniels Dan Patrick State Virginia California Georgia Virginia New York Wisconsin Virginia Indiana Office Lieutenant Speaker of the House Speaker of the House Assemblyperson Senate Leader Lieutenant Contributions $1,577,823 $1,034,053 $879,730 $804,412 $616,585 $407,479 $397,154 $383,255 $348,874 $321,437 $283,765 $281,700 $272,007 $259,886 $259,292 Notable here is the extraordinary representation of one state,. Among the top 15 recipients of wholesaler contributions are three s, two Lieutenant s, and two assembly leaders. Virginia meanwhile contributes three recipients to the top 18 list. It is not a surprise, nor unusual, that executive branch office holders dominate this list. The largest contributions generally go to incumbent governors no matter the industry, with top assembly and senate leaders also receiving the most contributions across all industries.

About The Cost of Keeping Modernity At Bay The National Association of Wine Retailers is entirely responsible for the content of this report. Data used to create the report came from The National Institute on Money in State Politics Follow The Money website (http://www.followthemoney.org). The research was done between May 1, 2017 and July 29, 2017. The data used to estimate contributions per capita was taken from the United States Census Bureau s Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for the United States (https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/tables/20102016/state/totals/nst-est2016-01.xlsx) and uses estimated state populations for 2016. About the National Association of Wine Retailers The National Association of Wine Retailers (NAWR) is a trade organization representing the United States progressive wine retailers. Members are located in states across the country. NAWR represents America s top progressive retailers by advocating for expanded retailer access to the national wine marketplace, modernization of the archaic alcohol regulatory environment across the country, opening of more states for legal retailer to consumer wine shipment and by offering an array of member benefits. NAWR engages is lobbying, litigation, industry education and media relations in order to advance its members interests. More information about NAWR can be found at http://www.nawr.org NAWR Contact Information Executive Director: Tom Wark Telephone: 707-266-1449 Email: tom@nawr.org Address: 621 Capitol Mall, Suite 2500, Sacramento, CA, 95814