Effects of Cane Burning on Older Raspberry Fields Tim Miller WSU NWREC
Raspberry Cane Burning Trial 2017-2018
Raspberry Cane Burning Trial The objective is to determine how floricane vigor may influence the effects of cane burning treatments and potentially affect stand longevity The trial was established at Lynden (Randy Honcoop, cooperator) in 2017 Two ends of the same Meeker field (planted 2010) were marked Low Vigor section High Vigor section Both received identical cane burning treatments
Cane Burning Treatments 1. No in-row treatments; late treatment with Aim to sides of the bed 2. Early treatment with Aim to full bed; no late treatment to sides of the bed 3. Standard treatment with Aim to full bed; no late treatment to sides of the bed
Cane Burning Treatments 4. Early treatment with Aim to full bed; late treatment with Aim to sides of the bed 5. Standard treatment with Aim to full bed; late treatment with Aim to sides of the bed
Cane Burning Treatments 6. No in-row treatments; late treatment with Goal to sides of the bed 7. Early treatment with Goal to full bed; no late treatment to sides of the bed 8. Standard treatment with Goal to full bed; no late treatment to sides of the bed
Cane Burning Treatments 9. Early treatment with Goal to full bed; late treatment with Aim to sides of the bed 10. Standard treatment with Goal to full bed; late treatment with Aim to sides of the bed 11. No caneburning (nontreated check)
Treatment Dates Early, when first primocanes were less than 2-inches tall (March 31 and April 9) Standard, when first primocanes were 4- to 6-inches tall (April 14 and April 20) Late (only to sides of the bed using a shielded sprayer so primocanes in the row weren t treated) If full bed was not previously treated (April 25 and April 27) If full bed was previously treated at the early timing (May 19 and May 14) If full bed was previously treated at the standard timing (May 25 and May 22)
canes/25 ft 160 140 120 Mid-Trial Floricane Counts a 100 80 60 a b b 40 20 0 2017 2018 2017 2018 High Vigor Low Vigor
canes/25 ft 80 70 60 50 Mid-Trial Floricane Counts Change from 2017 to 2018 40 30 20 Low Vigor High Vigor 10 0-10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
canes/25 ft 80 70 60 50 Mid-Trial Floricane Counts Change from 2017 to 2018 40 30 20 Low Vigor High Vigor 10 0-10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
canes/25 ft 80 70 60 50 Mid-Trial Floricane Counts Change from 2017 to 2018 40 30 20 Low Vigor High Vigor 10 0-10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Berry Sampling Yield g/0.5 m 525 450 375 ns ns 300 225 150 a b 75 0 2017 2018 2017 2018 High Vigor Low Vigor
Berry Sampling Yield g/0.5 m 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 2017-18 Average NS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
g/berry 3 Sampling 50-Berry Weight 2.5 2 1.5 a ns b ns 1 0.5 0 2017 2018 2017 2018 High Vigor Low Vigor
Sampling Fifty-Berry Weight g/berry 2.5 2.4 2.3 2017-18 Average NS 2.2 2.1 2 1.9 1.8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Cane Conclusions 2017 was a good year for primocane production 2018 counts still to come this winter Cane burning programs in 2017 did not greatly impact high vigor canes (100 or more floricanes/25 ft of row) for 2018 Cane counts increased about the same amount in all programs The lowest increase was observed after late Aim to sides only
Cane Conclusions Cane burning programs in 2017 affected low vigor canes (fewer than 100 floricanes/25 ft of row) fairly significantly Cane counts increased most with no cane burning Cane counts stayed about the same with early Aim or Goal with no late treatment to the sides of the bed Cane counts showed the least increase in late Aim to sides only, early Goal with no late Aim, with standard Goal to with or without late Aim, or with late Goal to sides only
Berry Conclusions 2018 was a better year for yield and fruit size than 2017 Cane burning programs did not significantly increase yield or fruit size either year Trend was for greater yield with cane burning than without Low vigor raspberries tended to produce less fruit when treated with late Aim to sides only High vigor raspberries tended to produce less fruit when treated with late Goal to sides only, with standard Goal and no late Aim, or early Goal and late Aim
Baby Raspberry Trial 2016-2018 Raspberry plugs were transplanted at NWREC Cascade Harvest, Meeker, Squamish, and Wakefield in 2016 Meeker, Squamish, and Wakefield in 2017 and 2018 Herbicides applied PRE or POST transplant
Baby Raspberry Trial 2016-2018 In 2016, all tested herbicides were POSTR: Zeus, Chateau, Fierce, Devrinol, Prowl H2O, Surflan, Trellis, Matrix, Sandea, or Simazine In 2017 and 2018, all treatments were the same applied POSTR, except: Chateau and Fierce applied PRETR, due to excessive leaf injury in 2016 Devrinol replaced with Alion (POSTR) All plots handweeded in July
Weed Control in Baby Raspberry % September-October, 2016-2018 100 80 * * 60 40 * * 20 0 *Currently registered products
Longest Raspberry Primocane inches 50 40 30 September-October, 2016-2018 * * * * 20 10 0 *Currently registered products
Baby Raspberry Conclusions Alion, Chateau, Fierce, Matrix, Prowl H2O, Sandea, and Zeus are not currently registered for newly planted raspberry, but hold good potential for registration Of the registered treatments, the best weed control was given by Surflan and Trellis Moderate weed control resulted from Devrinol and Simazine
Baby Raspberry Conclusions Of the registered treatments, the longest primocanes at the end of the first growing season were with Surflan, followed by Devrinol, simazine, and Trellis, all comparable to nontreated raspberry plugs Nonregistered treatments: The longest primocanes were with Chateau (PRETR) and Fierce (PRETR), all longer than nontreated raspberry plugs Alion, Prowl H2O, and Zeus were next best, similar in length as nontreated raspberry plugs
cm/cane 350 Floricane Length 2018 Nontreated 300 250 200 150 100 Low Vigor High Vigor 50 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11