Bunker Silo and Drive- Over Silage Pile Management

Similar documents
ANSWERS TO SOME COMMON QUESTIONS ON SILAGE MANAGEMENT

CHAMPION TOC INDEX. How To Make Barley Silage. Arvid Aasen. Take Home Message. The Ensiling Process

Dr. Dan Undersander University of Wisconsin

Harvest and Storage of Silage. Ted Probert Regional Dairy Specialist

Comparing Qualities of Grain Corn to Silage Corn

Silage Forage Quality Using Inoculants and Packing. Dr. Dan Undersander University of Wisconsin

Evaluating forage quality by visual appraisal, ph, and dry matter content

Managing Forage for Single Digit Shrink Loss in Bunker Silos and Drive-over Piles

Factors Affecting the Quality Silage After Harvest. Fermentation. Aerobic stability. Aerobic Stability of Silages?

Successful Storage of By-Products

THE ART AND SCIENCE OF MAKING SILAGE. Richard E. Muck 1 ABSTRACT

Opp p o p r o tun u i n t i ie i s t o o I m I p m r p ov o e v S arch h D ig i e g stib i i b l i i l t i y y on o n D air i y F rms

Supplementation Some protein, a lil energy, and minerals. Josh Davy MS, PAS, CRM UC Advisor Livestock and Range Tehama, Glenn, Colusa

CC110 Questions and Answers on Silage

Economic and Environmental Impacts Of Corn Silage Maturity Management

Corn Silage for Dairy Cows 1

How to Build a Wine Cellar

Silage is a forage crop that is preserved in succulent condition by a process of fermentation (i.e. under anaerobic conditions).

Factors Affecting the Quality Silage

Harvesting Soybean. Soybean Loss. John Nowatzki Extension Agricultural Machine Systems Specialist

Making. High Quality SWEETPOTATO SILAGE. An Improved Tube Silage Making Method. transforming into

Baby corn is the young ear of female inflorescence of maize plant harvested before fertilization when the silk has just (1) Baby corn crop.

Disaster Recovery. Managing immature crops for grain or silage. Determining if it has reached maturity for a harvestable grain crop

Effects of Ground Ear Corn vs. Ear Corn Silage on Rumen Fatty Acid Content

Baled Silage. Wayne Coblentz USDA-ARS US Dairy Forage Research Center Marshfield, WI

Section 3 Dough Management

Bread Troubleshooting Guide

Name. AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III May 4, points possible

WATER AND SOIL PROPERTIES. ExPERImENTAL PROCEdURE

CODEX STANDARD FOR RICE CODEX STAN

2016 & 2017 Legend Seeds Silage Research Report

Long Term Storage FOOD STORAGE WHY STORE FOOD? EMERGENCIES WEATHER JOB LOSS ILLNESS SAVE $$ 2012 ResilienceNW Conference 1

Terrace Drying in Brazil: Facilities and Control of Quality and Safety during Drying

Effects of feeding brown midrib dwarf. performance and enteric methane. pearl millet silage on lactational. emission in dairy cows

Lecture 4. Factors affecting ripening can be physiological, physical, or biotic. Fruit maturity. Temperature.

Three different kinds of silage may be recognized according to the temperature during fermentation:

DESIGNED FOR MAKING MILK. dependable yields quality fiber digestible starch

AWRI Refrigeration Demand Calculator

Best Quality for the Best Wines

CODEX STANDARD FOR QUICK FROZEN STRAWBERRIES 1 CODEX STAN

TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHEET: CALCIUM CHLORIDE FLAKE - LIQUOR TREATMENT

Some Hay Considerations

GRAIN INSPECTION, PACKERS AND STOCKYARDS CHAPTER 3 ADMINISTRATION FEDERAL GRAIN INSPECTION SERVICE STOP 3630 WASHINGTON, D.C.

CODEX STANDARD FOR CANNED APRICOTS CODEX STAN

Managing for Corn Silage Yield and Quality. Ev Thomas Miner Institute

Table of Contents. Foundation and Preparation 2 Hearth Base Dimensions 2. Laying the Inner Hearth 3 Inner Hearth Dimensions 4

FOOD SAFETY RATING GUIDE. Eat safe essentials. A quick guide to food safety that all food businesses need to know.

Distillation Purification of Liquids

Compare Measures and Bake Cookies

Unit F: Harvesting Fruits and Nuts. Lesson 2: Grade, Pack, Store and Transport Fruits and Nuts

Fermentation Characteristics of Round-Bale Silages R.E. Muck USDA, Agricultural Research Service US Dairy Forage Research Center, Madison, WI 53706

CODEX STANDARD FOR CANNED PEACHES 1 CODEX STAN

Sustainable Sweet Corn Production?


Department: DOC#: 1 REV: Effective Date: Supersedes: Subject: Blue Cheese from Pasteurized Milk

CODEX STANDARD FOR CANNED TOMATOES 1 CODEX STAN

Hybrid Seeds Production

Corn Quality for Alkaline Cooking: Analytical Challenges

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Standard Operating Procedures

TEMPORARY FOOD PERMIT APPLICATION

Focus. Forage. 1. Why grow maize for silage?

Home Freezing of Foods. Lunch & Learn 12 noon to 1 pm June 2, 2014

GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS Standard Operating Procedures. Policy Number: Effective Date: 1/16/2018 Page Number: 1 of 6

EFFECT OF HARVEST TIMING ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SMALL GRAIN FORAGE. Carol Collar, Steve Wright, Peter Robinson and Dan Putnam 1 ABSTRACT

Thermal Hydraulic Analysis of 49-2 Swimming Pool Reactor with a. Passive Siphon Breaker

VACUUM PACKAGING EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT T : / F :

Instructor: Stephen L. Love Aberdeen R & E Center 1693 S 2700 W Aberdeen, ID Phone: Fax:

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching

Servi-Tech Laboratories

CODEX STANDARD FOR QUICK FROZEN WHOLE KERNEL CORN CODEX STAN

Chapter 3 Dough Ingredients

HARVESTING MAXIMUM VALUE FROM SMALL GRAIN CEREAL FORAGES. George Fohner 1 ABSTRACT

The Column Oven Oven capabilities Oven safety Configuring the oven Making a temperature-programmed run Fast chromatography

Crops - Commercial. Soybeans

March The newborn calf 3/14/2016. Risks and Benefits of Milk vs. Milk Replacers for. Low milk prices???? Incentive to lower SCC?

Workshop on International Trade of Fresh Fruit and Vegetables: The role of Standards and Quality Inspection systems

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Sample Technical Instructions

Lab 2-1: Measurement in Chemistry

Mastering Measurements

TABLE #2 SHOWING THE WEIGHT AND BULK OF RATIONS 1

Harvesting Stonefruit

Density Gradient Column Lab

INSTRUCTION MANUAL MODELS: RT-30, RT-36, RT-48, RT-60 & RT-72 REVISED APRIL, 2003 *PLEASE RETAIN FOR FUTURE REFERENCE

Price and Information List

PickYourOwn.org. Where you can find a pick-your-own farm near you!

Quadrilateral vs bilateral VSP An alternative option to maintain yield?

Buying Filberts On a Sample Basis

YEDENT AGRO GROUP OF COMPANIES PROCESSING OF SOY BASED PRODUCTS FOR HUMAN FOODS AND POULTRY FEEDS

Which of the following tools should Rebecca use to measure the mass of each sample? Question 2. Add

Post-Harvest Storage of Pulses

Notification of a Stall

Wood Sugar Molasses. for Dairy Cattle. I. R. Jones. gricu kural Experiment Station. State College Station Circular 181. regon. September 1949.

Coffee-and-Cream Science Jim Nelson

GUIDELINES FOR THE INSTALLATION AND USE OF OPEN-AIR BARBECUES

Roast Beef Jan. 1, 2009

CALIFORNIA PREMIUM ALMONDS

Unit Test: Nature of Science

Features. Before first use

Quadrilateral vs bilateral VSP An alternative option to maintain yield?

Transcription:

Bunker Silo and Drive- Over Silage Pile Management By: Donna M. Amaral-Phillips Management of a bunker silo or drive-over silage pile during harvest, storage and feedout directly impacts the quantity and quality of silage fed to dairy cows. Dry matter (DM) losses can be substantial in bunkers and drive over piles not harvested at the correct moisture, packed adequately, covered with plastic, and weighted down adequately using tires which touch, sandbags or some other weighting system. A study with uncovered bunker silos showed a 75% loss of DM of corn silage within the top 10 inches (25 cm) and 25% losses within the next 10 inches of surface area on top of the bunker compared to bunkers properly covered with plastic and tires. For a 30 ft (9 m) by 100 ft (30 m) bunker, approximately 50 tons (45 metric tons) of corn silage would be lost. This amount of silage is equal to the amount needed to feed approximately 10 lactating cows for a year or $2250 worth of silage (silage valued at $45/ton). These losses are substantial and the extent of losses may not be realized unless the difference between the amount of silage entering and fed out of a structure is measured. To make the best use of forage resources, proper management of forages during storage and at feedout is critical. The following key areas should be reviewed to see whether bunker or drive-over pile management can be improved to reduce feed shrink and improve forage quality at feedout. Sizing bunkers and piles Bunkers, trenches, and piles need to be sized such that a minimum of 8 to 12 inches (20-30 cm) is removed daily from the silo face. This is one of the most important and often forgotten calculations when sizing these structures. The height of a structure should always be limited by the safe vertical reach of silage removal equipment. When sizing the width of bunkers, trenches, and piles, they should be at a minimum of 2 times the width of the packing tractor and the maximum width determined by the amount of silage that needs to be removed daily to maintain a fresh silo face. For example, if a 500 milking cow herd is fed 20 lbs/day (9 kg/day) of DM from silage per cow (60 lb/day (27 kg/day) as-fed at 33% DM), the maximum width should be 156 feet (47 m) or 78 feet (24 m) if half of the silage DM was corn silage and the remaining half another type of silage. (These calculations assume 10% storage losses, 5% feeding losses, 8 foot side walls, and daily remove 8 inches of silage face.) To calculate your own silo dimensions,

see Bunker Silo Sizing Spreadsheet developed by Dr. Brian Holmes. It is always best to have too narrow of a silo than too wide. Oversizing silage storage can result in major feed shrink. Provisions should be made to have extra silage in storage elsewhere to feed while the new crop is fermenting for a minimum of 3 weeks. Some may want to plan for additional storage so that corn silage can ferment for a longer time to increase starch digestibility by dairy cattle. Research has shown increases in starch digestibility in corn silage stored for 240 days after harvest. As a practical recommendation in the field, nutritionists generally allow new crop corn silage to ferment for 4 months before feeding it, if sufficient old crop silage is available. Thus, additional storage may be needed if this practice is used on the farm. Provide concrete or asphalt floors The floor of a bunker or silage pile should be a solid surface with adequate drainage. All effluent from silage storage structures should be contained and diverted into the appropriate containment facility, i.e. liquid manure containment. Improperly handled silage effluent potentially can be a source of on-farm pollution. This surface area should be readily accessible to feeding equipment used for loading forages and close to feeds stored in bins or bays within commodity sheds. Unpaved surfaces will become muddy during rainy times of the year especially when drainage is inadequate. If not managed carefully, gravel bases with large particle size rock material will result in the addition of large stones into mixing equipment, resulting in increased wear of equipment and potentially causing equipment failure. Management at harvest Forages need to be harvested at the proper stage of maturity. For example, alfalfa should be harvested at the pre-bud stage, grasses no later than late boot (just before they head out), and corn for silage at the proper DM content. Silage in a bunker or drive-over pile should be ensiled between 30 to 35% DM (65-70% moisture) for corn silage, but if weather or cutting schedules dictate, corn silage can be harvested up to 37% DM. For alfalfa and grass silages, plants should be wilted and ensiled at 35 to 40% DM. Chopper knives should be keep sharp for optimum chop length. Corn silage should be chopped to about 3/8 to ½ inch with a conventional chopper and ¾ inch with a chopper with a kernel processor. Alfalfa silage usually is chopped at 3/8 to ½ inch theoretical length of cut. A Penn State Separator box can be used to determine if the appropriate chop length has been achieved (see table below).

Penn State Particle Separator Corn Silage As fed % retained Alfalfa/Grass Silages Upper Sieve 3-8 10-20 Middle Sieve 45-65 45-75 Lower Sieve 30-40 20-30 Bottom Pan <5 <5 Reference: http://extension.psu.edu/animals/dairy/nutrition/forages/forage-quality-... Kernel processors on corn silage choppers should be set at 1 to 3 mm between rollers and should be adjusted, such that greater than 95% of the kernels are cracked with approximately 70% of the kernels equal or smaller than 1/3 to ¼ of a kernel. Slices of the corn cob should be broken into at least 8 pieces. On farm, a 32 oz. (0.95 L) beverage cup filled level with chopped corn silage can be used to determine if the rollers of the kernel processer are set correctly. No more than 2 to 3 whole or half pieces of corn kernels should be present in this sized sample. If too many whole or half kernels are present, the clearance between the rollers needs to be decreased to increase starch digestion of the corn grain. (L. Kung, personal communication and W. Mahanna, Feedstuffs). Some commercial forage testing laboratories can dry a sample of fresh or fermented corn silage and then measure the amount of starch retained on or passing through a 4.75 mm sieve. From this information, a processing score is calculated. For fresh samples, 70% or more of the starch should pass through the 4.75 mm screen. Since there is a delay in receiving this information on farm, it is difficult to use this information to adjust the rollers at the time of harvesting corn silage. Plastic should be placed on the sides of the bunker to minimize air infiltration through the side walls to minimize spoilage. After filling, the excess plastic is placed on top of the pile and the entire top covered with an additional piece of plastic and then weighted with tires that touch, sand bags, or other materials. Use of oxygen limiting barrier films has been shown to decrease spoilage and should be considered. Silage piles should be packed using tractors to achieve a bulk density greater than 44 lbs as fed/ft 3. Bulk density measures the weight of forage particles within a set volume. To achieve these packing densities, silage should be spread in thin layers on a wedge and packed continuously and multiple times with the adequate amount of tractor weight. Recommendations are to use 800 lbs (364 kg) of packing tractor weigh per ton of silage delivered per hour of harvest. On larger piles or with rapid delivery of fresh chopped material to the storage structure, more than one tractor may be necessary. Drive over

piles should be sized with sides on a 1 to 3 slope (1 foot or meter of height to 3 feet or meter of length). Remember human safety is the first and foremost concern and consideration when packing silage and when feeding out!! Bunkers and piles need to be packed well especially the top 6 inches (15 cm) and then covered with plastic or barrier films. If tires are used, they are placed on top of the plastic to not only hold the plastic in place but also exclude oxygen. Tires should touch one another to achieve these goals and minimize spoilage and DM losses in the top layers of silage. Sandbags or other materials to hold the plastic in place can be used effectively. Managing silage at feedout The amount of silage and the manner of silage removal from all types of storage structures directly impacts the quality of silage being fed. The key principle is to remove an adequate amount of silage every day to keep the silage face fresh. At the same time, silage needs to be removed such that the area directly behind the new silo face is not disturbed to prevent the infiltration of oxygen. If oxygen is allowed to enter the silo face, the silage heats while still in storage (often initiated by growth of yeasts), quality of the silage deteriorates rapidly at feedout, and then less DM or feed may be consumed by dairy cows. When removing silage from these structures, always maintain a smooth face and minimize digging into the face of the silage. If tractor buckets are used for removing silage, they should remove feed carefully from the top down and not by digging into the pile from the bottom or middle of the pile s face. Mechanized silo facers minimize oxygen infiltration into the packed face beyond the amount to be fed and can be cost effective. o When removing silage from the face of the pile, only the amount needed for the current feeding(s) should be removed. Unfed, excess feed quickly heats and deteriorates in quality. Silos with poor face management generally have a higher ph and temperature at the face compared to 2 to 3 feet (60-90 cm) behind the face. These findings indicate aerobic instability with aerobic yeast activity resulting in silage heating. Generally, bunk life of this feed is shortened and once heated, dairy cattle usually eat less of this silage. To determine the ph or temperature of a silo face versus 2 to 3 feet (60-90 cm) inside the face, measurements should be taken at several locations throughout the silo face. Because of the potential instability of the silo face, extreme caution should be taken by those making these measurements and always have another person close with necessary equipment in case of a silage avalanche. A non-contact thermometer and a 2 to 3 foot (60 to 90 cm) temperature probes (compost temperature probes) or thermal imaging (infrared) cameras can be used to compare the temperature of silage at the face

versus 2 to 3 feet (60-90 cm) behind the face. The temperature inside the pile should be within 15 F of ambient temperature at harvest and within 15 F of the temperature of silage at the surface. ph paper or a ph meter can be used to measure the ph of silages when 1 to 2 ounces (30-60 ml) of silage is mixed with equal amounts of distilled water in a disposable cup. For corn silage, ph should be between 3.7 and 4.2 and for grass, alfalfa, or clover silage (30-40% DM) ph should be between 4.3 to 4.7. Silage Sampling Safety First: Silage samples to determine DM and nutrient content should not be collected at the face of the silo to ensure the safety of those taking these samples. Instead, silage should be removed across the face of the silo using the normal method of removing silage (i.e. tractor bucket with or without a silo facer), added to the TMR wagon without any other ingredients, allowed to mix, and then discharged on the feeding pad away from the face of the silo. Then, samples can be safely collected for nutrient analysis. Individuals should not be standing closer than 2.5 to 3 times the height of the storage structure to prevent human injury.