During the past decade of working as a viticulturist in the

Similar documents
Wine Grape Trellis and Training Systems

Training system considerations

Canopy Management for Disease Control in Wine Grapes Grape IPM Workshop March, 2011

Tremain Hatch Vineyard training & design

WHAT IS NEW WITH CANOPY MANAGEMENT?

Inherent Characteristics Affecting Balance of Common Footill Grape Varieties

Kelli Stokely Masters of Agriculture candidate Department of Horticulture Oregon Wine Research Institute

Your headline here in Calibri.

Vineyard Mechanization at French Camp

Vineyard Cash Flows Tremain Hatch

2018 Vineyard Economics Survey

Varieties and Rootstocks in Texas

Vineyard Water Management

CANOPY MANAGEMENT AND VINE BALANCE

High Cordon Machine Pruned Trellis Comparison to Three Standard Systems in Lodi

Quadrilateral vs bilateral VSP An alternative option to maintain yield?

Crop Load Management of Young Vines

Canopy Management. M of W 08/02/2012. Plumpton College

Do lower yields on the vine always make for better wine?

Cost of Establishment and Operation Cold-Hardy Grapes in the Thousand Islands Region

Quadrilateral vs bilateral VSP An alternative option to maintain yield?

Overview. Cold Climate Grape Growing: Starting and Sustaining a Vineyard

Demonstration Vineyard for Seedless Table Grapes for Cool Climates

Help in Addressing the Challenges to Entering the Vineyard and Winery Industry

Tasting Session- TWGGA Conference 2019 Moderator- Penny S. Adams Will TEXAS Tempranillo be Sustainable?

Willsboro Grape Variety Trial Willsboro Research Farm Willsboro, NY

Common Problems in Grape Production in Alabama. Dr. Elina Coneva Department of Horticulture, Auburn University

Mechanical Canopy and Crop Load Management of Pinot Gris. Joseph P. Geller and S. Kaan Kurtural

Understanding Seasonal Nutritional Requirements

Leaf removal: a tool to improve crop control and fruit quality in vinifera grapes

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

2011 Regional Wine Grape Marketing and Price Outlook

Vine Training Systems: What Purposes Do They Serve and What Attributes Are Most Important? Thomas J. Zabadal, MSU Dept.

The Napa Valley is a wine growing gregion with many appellations. Napa received its own AVA designation in 1981 making

Berry = Sugar Sink. Source: Sink Relationships in the Grapevine. Source: Sink Relations. Leaf = Photosynthesis = Source

Ohio Grape-Wine Electronic Newsletter

Lesson 2 The Vineyard. From Soil to Harvest

Oregon Wine Advisory Board Research Progress Report

Table grapes for eastern Canada

is pleased to introduce the 2017 Scholarship Recipients

Managing Pests & Disease in the Vineyard. Michael Cook

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 18 August 2014 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station

Pruning Berries, Grapes and Kiwi

Colorado State University Viticulture and Enology. Grapevine Cold Hardiness

Wine Grape Cultivar Trial Performance in 2008

Organic viticulture research in Pennsylvania. Jim Travis, Bryan Hed, and Noemi Halbrendt Department of Plant Pathology Penn State University

Growing Cabernet Sauvignon at Wynns Coonawarra Estate

Practical Aspects of Crop Load and Canopy Management

Growing your blend Georgia Wine Producers Conference. January 24, Cain Hickey

Need Quality? Try Canopy and Fruit Zone Management Vermont and New Hampshire

2019 Annual 4-H Plant Sale

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

Summary of Grape Variety and Rootstock Performance Data Oklahoma Fruit and Pecan Research Station Perkins, OK

Archival copy. For current information, see the OSU Extension Catalog:

A Field Evaluation of Select Wine Grape Varieties for the Aurora and Medford Areas of Oregon- A Progress Report

Grape Growers of Ontario Developing key measures to critically look at the grape and wine industry

Global Perspectives Grant Program

North San Joaquin Valley Almond Day

Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Grapevine Cold Hardiness

Lack of irrigation in 2002 reduced Riesling crop in Timothy E. Martinson Finger Lakes Grape Program

Estimating and Adjusting Crop Weight in Finger Lakes Vineyards

Bounty71 rootstock an update

NE-1020 Cold Hardy Wine Grape Cultivar Trial

Title: Evaluation of Apogee for Control of Runner Growth in Annual Plasticulture Strawberries

Washington Wine Commission: Wine industry grows its research commitment

Performance of cool-climate grape varieties in Delta County. Horst Caspari Colorado State University Western Colorado Research Center

Performance of cool-climate grape varieties in Delta County. Horst Caspari Colorado State University Western Colorado Research Center

Research Report: Use of Geotextiles to Reduce Freeze Injury in Ontario Vineyards

Vineyard Site Selection and Layout. Dean Volenberg UW-Extension Door County

Vine Size Management in Eastern Vineyards

1. Continuing the development and validation of mobile sensors. 3. Identifying and establishing variable rate management field trials

Big Data and the Productivity Challenge for Wine Grapes. Nick Dokoozlian Agricultural Outlook Forum February

Title: Report, High Tunnel Fresh Market Slicer Tomato Variety Trial 2010

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 12 July 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

FOH WINE AND BEER KNOWLEDGE LESSON WEEK TWO

Wine Grape Cultivar Trial Performance in 2006 Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion

New York s revitalized grapevine certification program and New York nurseries. Marc Fuchs Associate Professor Cornell University

GRAPES. Stop watering the end of August or first of September to harden off grape vines for winter. Keep foliage dry - don't overhead water.

Evaluation of 35 Wine Grape Cultivars and Chardonnay on 4 Rootstocks Grown in Western Colorado

AVOCADOS IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY

HSC Geography. Year 2016 Mark Pages 30 Published Feb 7, Geography Notes. By Annabelle (97.35 ATAR)

DR. RENEE THRELFALL RESEARCH SCIENTIST INSTITUTE OF FOOD SCIENCE & ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS

Itasca A Winemaker s Grape for Cold Climates Matt Clark, Assistant Professor 7/11/2017

U-Pick and Small Market Blueberry Cultivars for Mississippi S.J. Stringer and D.A. Marshall-Shaw USDA-ARS TCSHL, Poplarville, MS

Final Report. TITLE: Developing Methods for Use of Own-rooted Vitis vinifera Vines in Michigan Vineyards

ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MAIZE CULTIVATED AREA AND PRODUCTION IN ROMANIA

2017 Annual 4-H Plant Sale

Flowering and Fruiting Morphology of Hardy Kiwifruit, Actinidia arguta

Growing vines in sites infested with Xiphinema index

RED FIVE STAR WINERY Winery Awarded 5 Red Stars by James Halliday Wine Companion Outstanding Winery Regularly Producing Wines Of Exemplary Quality

Vintage 2006: Umpqua Valley Reference Vineyard Report

Treating vines after hail: Trial results. Bob Emmett, Research Plant Pathologist

In the heart of Provence

World of Wine: From Grape to Glass Syllabus

Pepper Bridge Winery AMAVI CELLARS

Evaluating Hazelnut Cultivars for Yield, Quality and Disease Resistance

THE AWSEF IS PLEASED TO INTRODUCE THE 2018 SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS

Evolution of Grapegrowing Techniques and New Viticulture Ideas in Spain. Jesús Yuste.

Zinfandel Heritage Vineyard

Welcome to. Growing Blackberry as Annual Crop in Florida

Transcription:

Grapevine Training System Trends in the South While VSP trellises still rule in Texas, other systems have their own advantages By Fritz Westover During the past decade of working as a viticulturist in the eastern and southern United States, I have observed that the vertical shoot positioned (VSP) vine-training method is the most commonly used of all available systems (see photo at right). There are many good reasons for the dominance of the VSP system: It is relatively simple to install and implement, and it adapts to a wide range of grape varieties including vinifera and interspecific hybrid winegrapes. In-row vine spacing, between-row spacing and canopy height can all vary a great deal within the VSP-training system, and both spur- and cane-pruning techniques can be applied within its confines, resulting in a wide range of canopy architecture. Furthermore, the VSP system seems to best conform to vineyard mechanization, which is a big advantage at a time when decreases in labor input and production costs per acre are ever present. Although the apparent simplicity and adaptability of the VSP system is evident, not all new vineyards in the South are being installed exclusively with VSP. Several other training systems have their place in the hot southern climate. In this article I will summarize some of the non-mainstream systems that are being implemented in Texas and how they are adapted to fit the needs of local grapegrowers. Divided-canopy training systems VSP (or some modified version thereof) remains the most widely used training system for vinifera and interspecific hybrid winegrapes in the majority of Texas vineyards. However, yields with this system are quite variable across the state depending upon site, variety and seasonal conditions. As with other hot growing regions, there are concerns regarding excessive sun exposure and uneven fruit ripening if canopies are not managed accordingly. The hybrid grapes steal the show with respect to the use of divided canopy training systems, perhaps as a function of the climate where those varieties are grown in Texas. On average, the Gulf Coast region experiences approximately 40 or more inches of rainfall annually. Soils tend to be deep and either sandy loam, clay or a mixture of clay loam and clay. The high-vigor capacity of these soils, combined with plentiful annual rainfall and inherent high vigor of the hybrid grapes, often results in the need for larger canopies, hence a trellis and training system that can allow for larger canopies. Divided canopy training systems have long had the reputation of producing greater yields than traditional, non-divided systems With traditional VSP training systems, yields vary depending upon site, variety, canopy management and seasonal conditions. such as VSP. Divided-canopy training systems can be designed to separate two canopies horizontally (such as with the Geneva Double Curtain and the Lyre training systems) or vertically (such as with the Smart-Dyson or Scott Henry systems). For a review of these systems I recommend the Wine Grape Production Guide for Eastern North America 1 or Sunlight into Wine. 2 The two major divided canopies that are utilized in Texas are the Geneva Double Curtain and a modified version of the high-wire system known locally as the Watson System. Where VSP training systems have been implemented on high-vigor sites, there is room for modification miwinebarrel Stainless Steel & Oak Wine Barrels... Midwest, East Coast, Great Lakes, Canada... miwinebarrel.com We now also provide... Custom Stainless Steel Tanks! 734.398.2028 Wines & Vines MARCH 2013 53

The Geneva Double Curtain training system originally was developed for vineyard sites with high-vigor capacity. of those systems into vertically divided systems in an attempt to balance excessive vegetative growth by production of additional fruit. The Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service has been evaluating the use of divided-canopy training systems over the past five years on both red and white Pierce s disease-tolerant hybrids in the Gulf Coast region. Geneva Double Curtain The Geneva Double Curtain (GDC) training system, developed in Geneva, N.Y., by Dr. Nelson Shaulis, is a benchmark example of a divided training system originally intended for juice and hybrid Grapegrowing CENTRAL NM El Paso TEXAS Trellis trial sites MEX Lubbock Dallas Texas A&M Austin Austin County Vineyards Rolling Hills Vineyards winegrape production on vineyard sites having high vigor capacity (see photo at left). Since its adoption with juice grapes, the GDC system also has found increased popularity with interspecific hybrid winegrapes. The winegrape variety Norton (also known as Cynthiana) is often grown on this system due in part to two of its major morphological characteristics: procumbent (downward or trailing) shoot growth and moderate cluster size. The high-wire fruiting zone of the GDC system accommodates the downward shoot growth, while the increased yield from the divided canopy helps to improve yield per acre of a relatively modest cluster size. Because Norton works well with GDC, growers are now experiencing better economic returns OK AR LA Gulf of Mexico As good As it gets. Natural Corks Champagne Corks Twinline Corks Bartops VISION Wine Stopper G-Cap Screw Cap Sales Representatives Chris & Liz Stamp info@lakewoodcork.com Lakewood Cork 4024 State Route 14 Watkins Glen, NY 14891 lakewoodcork.com 607-535-9252 607-535-6656 Fax Winery Chillers 1.5 to 15 Hp / R 404A Model DCS MODEL DCP New 2013 Energy Savings Models Could save up to $350.00 per year Copeland Scroll Compressor Built in self diagnosis Remote tank and pumps CALL: 800 849 4264 2 to 15 Hp / R 404A Package Chiller with Tank & Pumps Easy & Quick to Install Copeland Scroll Compressor Tank and Pumps built in Ask about QUICK SHIP & FREIGHT ALLOWANCE SPECIALS 54 Wines & Vines MARCH 2013

While the yield benefits appear obvious with the GDC system, disadvantages include possible uneven ripening of fruit, sunburn (the fruit zone is at the top of the canopy and may become overexposed) and the potential to over crop if vines are not properly pruned and thinned. Occasionally, growers also will lament that clusters can become covered by excess leaf layers on the sides of the canopy, which may reduce spray penetration and increase rot susceptibility. Almost all GDC-trained vines in the East and South are hand-harvested. However, there are vineyards utilizing mechanical harvesters that have implemented this system in other areas of the country such as the San Joaquin Valley of California. Fruit hangs under catch wires with the Watson System, increasing the chance clusters will be shaded from full sun exposure. per acre. University research has been initiated to refine canopy management and crop balance on GDC-trellised vineyards in order to improve wine quality. 3 Of the hybrid winegrapes tolerant of Pierce s disease (PD), Blanc Du Bois is one of the best adapted for high-wire systems such as the GDC. 4 Blanc Du Bois is a vigorous grape variety similar to Norton in that it has both modest cluster size and a procumbent growth habit. Commercial yields of Blanc Du Bois on vigorous soils in the Gulf Coast are reported in the range of 6 to 8 tons per acre on 8-foot in-row vine spacing and 12-foot between-row vine spacing. The Watson System The Watson System, developed by Jerry Watson of Austin County Vineyards, has gained much popularity in the United States Gulf Coast region during the past five years. Initially, Austin County Vineyards was planted on 8x12 spacing on a vigorous sandy loam topsoil over clay subsoil. The original training system consisted of a high-fruiting wire at 66 inches and bi-lateral cordons. The procumbent growth of the shoots resulted in excess leaf layers in the fruit zone, causing difficulties with spray penetration and hand harvest. This problem may not be the case with high-fruiting wire systems in other parts of the country, but with the high rainfall and humidity of the Gulf Coast climate and susceptibility to rot of local hybrid grapes, the need to adapt to a more open fruit zone is imperative. Wines & Vines MARCH 2013 55

Clusters growing on Watson System-trained vines hang free under the catch wires, allowing them to be easily sprayed and hand harvested. To do so, the trellis was modified by installing 4-foot V-cross arms at an angle of 120 just above or below the 66-inch fruiting wire and installing foliar catch wires at 12- and 24-inch intervals on those cross arms on both sides of the fruiting wire. Shoots are trained at a wide V from the central cordon, horizontally dividing the canopy down the middle. This split allows for an increased number of shoots per linear foot of cordon (up to eight, compared to three to five for VSP), and the fruit hangs under the catch wires, where it is more apt to be shaded from full sun exposure (see photo on page 55). The Watson System (perhaps similar to the French system livre ouvert) has been reported to produce yields in the range of 4 to 6 tons per acre for Blanc Du Bois on 8-foot in-row vine spacing Grapegrowing and 12-foot between-row vine spacing. Newer vineyards are being planted with variations of in-row spacing. A minimum of 11 feet between rows is favored due to the width of the cross arms and foliage; 12 feet between rows is the standard spacing. Clusters in the Watson System hang free under the catch wires, where they can easily be sprayed and hand harvested (see photo at left). Shoot positioning is required to keep the canopy open, and hedging may be required to keep vigorous shoots from reaching the vineyard floor. Row orientation perpendicular to seasonal wind direction may also cause difficulties with maintaining canopy division. The Watson System also is being implemented with red hybrid winegrapes including Lenoir. 5 Modifications of VSP Occasionally a vineyard is installed using a VSP system, only to find when it comes into production that the system and vine spacing may not have been the best match for soil, climate and grape variety. For example, a grower may plant on a soil with high vigor capacity, perhaps with a vigorous rootstock, and then find that the shoot length grows considerably above the allotted trellis height, with excessive production of lateral shoots and large-caliper bull canes, and the need for seasonal hedging more than twice per year. This is a common problem in the eastern United States, and much research has been devoted to finding methods to balance vines in these situations (such as by using competitive cover crops and strategically reducing fertilizer and water input). Another alter- Need a Better Cork Supplier? All Natural Cork Closures Fresh Corks Directly From Portugal 4th Generation Family Cork Producer Free Branding Free Shipping Free is Better Ask about our Progressive Discounts Experience the Slimcork Advantage CALL TODAY phone (203) 681-7743 Cell (860) 335-0667 email: reliablecork@gmail.com www.reliablecorksolutions.com The Kuriyama Value Wine and Beverage Hoses POLYWIRE PLUS Suction & Discharge WSTF Series Suction & Discharge 350LL Series Washdown 1968 45th KURIYAMA OF AMERICA, INC. Anniversary Schaumburg, Illinois 2013 CLEARBRAID Discharge FT Series Suction 408LL Series Suction & Discharge Kuriyama of America, Inc. 360 E. State Parkway Schaumburg, IL 60173-5335 USA (847) 755-0360 Toll-Free FAX: (800) 800-0320 International FAX: (847) 885-0996 sales@kuriyama.com www.kuriyama.com 56 Wines & Vines MARCH 2013

Shoots are trained in both upward and downward directions on this Favorite cultivar, shown next to a VSP-trained canopy for comparison. native for a grower is to divide a vigorous canopy in order to capitalize on the extra vigor by producing additional fruit. In 2009 a Texas vineyard planted with the PD-tolerant hybrid Favorite (a grape similar to Lenoir) was identified as having excessive vigor on its VSP training system (average cane weights greater than 40 grams and shoot hedging two or more times per year). In collaboration with the Texas A&M AgriLife Extension service, owners Louise and Ed Rice of Rolling Hills Vineyard implemented a replicated comparison of their existing VSP system with one modified to vertical canopy division. The VSP system consisted of bi-lateral cordons spur-pruned to five buds per linear foot. The divided system was the same, with the addition of two buds per foot retained in even spacing on the west side of the cordon (northsouth oriented rows). During the growing season, the east side of the canopy was maintained as standard VSP, having all shoots trained vertically, and the two buds per foot on the west side grew fruitful shoots trained in the downward direction (see photo at left). Shoot positioning was performed once on upward and downward shoots, approximately two weeks before bloom plus one follow-up pass, if needed, after fruit set. Sorokowsky 6 has evaluated a similar modification to VSP, referred to as the southern sprawl, and other similar modifications to VSP have been used in Virginia with success. The single-sided vertical division allows a grower to apply herbicides more easily under the vine row compared to a double-sided division and focuses the extra growth on the side of the canopy receiving the hotter, late-day sun. Winery Design, Operation, Consulting www.winedoc.com WINERY PLANNING High End Wines! Quality Products Real Efficiency Business Plans Building Layouts Equipment Specs Winemaking Dr. Tom Co rell 800 793-6436 Tom@WineDoc.com Wines & Vines MARCH 2013 57

In the Texas trial, leaves were removed once in the fruiting zone on the east side only, just after fruit set. In the first year of this project, the divided vines produced the equivalent of approximately 1 ton per acre more than the nondivided vines, with no significant differences in Brix, ph and titratable acidity at harvest between the fruit produced on upward and downward oriented shoots or between training systems (see photo at right). In this example the winemaker was primarily interested in fruit chemistry at harvest, and wines were not produced separately from the treated vines. During years two through four, the vines trained with divided canopies produced the equivalent of 2 tons or more per acre more than the non-divided vines. At this site, we observed that an increase greater than 2 tons per acre was undesirable, as it delayed ripening and reduced cane weights below the desired vigor levels. In this case, a four-year evaluation was required to establish how much yield increase could be achieved before negatively impacting fruit quality and vine balance. As a result of this trial, the Rolling Hills Vineyard has been converted to the vertically divided system, and the grower maintains a projected 1-2 tons per acre increase in yields while still producing fruit of the desired quality parameters of the winemaker. Hedging was reduced to one pass per season over the four years and in some years was not needed at all. While the application of herbicides is more challenging on the western side of the vine row, the grower has managed to adapt their spray application. Downward-trained shoots on the vertically divided training system produced about 1 ton per acre of additional fruit during the first year of transition from the standard VSP training system. Owned and operated by third generation grape growers, S & L Vineyards supplies bulk grapes, juices and wines to large and small wineries. Grown in Lodi/Woodbridge and the Sierra Foothills where the climate is warm and dry in the summers and cool and moist in the winters, our premium wine grapes are harvested at optimum brix levels, custom processed based on customer preference and placed in cold storage. Hand selected grapes are packed in halfton cardboard containers and shipped in refrigerated trailers directly to your facility via your preferred method and carrier. S & L Vineyards can be reached at 866.214.7273 or sales@slvineyards.com 58 Wines & Vines MARCH 2013

Trellis requirements for VSP modification Certain requirements must be met in order to vertically divide a VSP training system. For the training system modification at Rolling Hills Vineyard, the height of the fruiting wire was set at 42 inches above the ground. This height allowed enough room to produce the needed leaf area on downward-oriented shoots to achieve equivalent ripeness that coincided with the fruit on the upward-oriented shoots. The trellis above the fruiting wire must also allow for sufficient shoot length to ripen the fruit (usually 3.5- to 4-foot shoot length is sufficient). Some growth will occur above the top set of catch wires, thus a mammoth 8-foot top wire height should not be in order. One strategy I am implementing for new vineyards on sites with high vigor potential is to insist on a minimum fruiting wire height of 38 inches above the ground in order to allow for canopy division (should it be desired in future years). After all, there really is no need to get the fruit closer to the ground to accumulate heat. (Heat is not a limiting factor in the South!) Another noteworthy benefit of this modification is the ability for a grower to easily transition back and forth from VSP to the vertical canopy division as the seasons and vine age dictate. The decision to allow downward shoots occurs during dormant pruning, thus there is zero transition time between the two systems. Future work Several projects have been initiated by the Texas A&M AgriLife Extension service to evaluate the effects of training systems on yield and fruit quality. A replicated trial comparing Blanc Du Bois trellised on the GDC, Watson and VSP (both cane and spur pruned) training systems over five years was started in the Rio Grande Valley in 2011 in collaboration with USDA-ARS and Rio Farms Inc. The four-year study comparing Favorite winegrapes trained to VSP and vertically divided training systems at Rolling Hills Vineyard is complete, and this system is currently being evaluated for Blanc Du Bois winegrapes in Texas. WE Fritz Westover is a viticulture program specialist with the Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service. With over a decade of hands-on viticulture experience, Westover specializes in the development of applied research projects, educational workshops and vineyard consulting for the Texas wine industry. References 1. T.K. Wolf (Ed.). Wine Grape Production Guide for Eastern North America. 2008. NRAES-145. Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service (NRAES), Ithaca, NY. 2. R. Smart and M. Robinson. Sunlight into Wine. 1991. Winetitles, Underdale SA 5032, Australia. 3. R.J. Morris and G.L. Main. An investigation of training systems, pruning severity, spur length and shoot positioning on Cynthiana/Norton grapes. 2010; Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 61: 445-450. 4. F. Westover. Blanc Du Bois Takes Root: A winegrape found in Texas and the southeast is tolerant of Pierce s disease. Wines & Vines, February 2012; pp. 75-80. 5. F. Westover. Lenoir Gains Recognition: A Pierce s disease-tolerant winegrape succeeds in the South. Wines & Vines, May 2012; pp. 92-95. 6. D. Sorokowsky, Growing South: A premium winegrape grower s new training system improves quality and saves labor costs. American Fruit Grower. January 2008; pp. 8-9. Wine Packaging by Naylor WPN is a premier supplier to over 2,000 wineries, and wine & spirits shops. Our automatic bottom wine carriers are the perfect sturdy solution for your retail sales! Wine Packaging by Naylor 4138 Vineyard Rd. Stewartstown, PA 17363 (800) 292-3370 sales@naylorwine.com Ask about discounts for Wine America & Ohio Wine Producer members. www.naylorpackaging.com Naylor Wine Cellars is a lifetime member of Wine America, Pennsylvania Wine Assoc., Ohio Wine Producers and the NY Wine & Grape Foundation. Wines & Vines MARCH 2013 59