Hawaii H38 and Hawaii H68: Hawaiian Sweet Corn Hybrids

Similar documents
MANOA WONDER, NEW ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE RESISTANT POLE BEAN

., - ' :::.11 C' ' MBRAR'i I/~ SWEET CORN. Yukio Nakagawa FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY. Extension Circular 377 University of Hawaii April 1, 1957

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data. Hartmann, R. W. (Richard William), "Poamoho" pole bean.

TWO NEW MACADAMIA NUT VARIETIES

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Oregon State Agricultural College W. A. Sohoenfeld, Director HYBRID SVEET CORN STRAINS AND VARIETIES

PEARL HARBOR A TOMATO VARIETY RES ISTANT TO SPOTTED WILT IN HA\\TAII. B y K. KIK UT A, J. W. HF. N DRIX,,\ N D W. A. FR.-\7. I F.R

OPE MANCfb. A New, High Quality, Late-Ripening Mango Variety 'DARY. JUL : HAWAIIAN COLLECTION i-cp L. R. A. HAMIL TON. Circular 60

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

Pecan scab #1 biological production constraint in this region.

Growing Hazelnuts in the Pacific Northwest Hazelnut Varieties

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Observations and thoughts on resistance of corn to Ustilago maydis

Bred by Snowy River Seeds marketed by Strube

Jonathan H. Crane, Tropical Fruit Crop Specialist and Wanda Montas, Sr. Biologist

Purdue University Department of Agronomy

Diagnosing Vegetable Problems

Elk Mound Seed. Company Introduction

Progress Report on Avocado Breeding

Pecan Pollination. Dr. Patrick Conner University of Georgia, Horticulture Department

FOUNDATION, REGISTERED AND CERTIFIED PRODUCTION OF BARLEY, BUCKWHEAT, CANARYSEED, DURUM, FLAX, OAT, RYE, TRITICALE, AND WHEAT

Sugar-enhanced and Synergistic Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2014

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Sustainable Sweet Corn Production?

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2009

Bred by Snowy River Seeds marketed by Strube

A REPORT OF THE SUNFLOWER VARIETY REVIEW BOARD

Dd-#eluhgo S g. -ie lo : 3 Apg 1. Meaemet I-, Agcf~r. 0 - ~ tio AtSr * 0res. ;# I- en, s Ous.: e a S u lsi a a

Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.)

UH CTAHR Preliminary data release of New Macadamia Varieties Elihu Isele and Dr. Alyssa Cho

Maui Vegetable Notes July 13, 1989

(Vth]c Crops) Ancrev: Steiner ioistant Horticulturist Feetab1 e Crc)

Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2008

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

Proposed Potato Variety Release

WHEAT, WINTER - CERTIFIED

The Crunch Factor: Apple Development at the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum

Corn Earworm Management in Sweet Corn. Rick Foster Department of Entomology Purdue University

A REPORT OF THE NATIONAL SUNFLOWER VARIETY REVIEW BOARD

Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences N ew York State Agricultural Experiment Station

James L.Brewbaker, Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Science, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

SELF-POLLINATED HASS SEEDLINGS

EFFECTS OF HIGH TEMPERATURE AND CONTROLLED FRUITING ON COTTON YIELD

Sugar-enhanced Sweet Corn Cultivar Evaluation for Northern Indiana, 2004

.. Acknowledgment _----_---~

Objective: To examine Romaine lettuce varieties for resistance to yellow spot disorder

A REPORT OF THE NATIONAL SUNFLOWER VARIETY REVIEW BOARD

Randy Nelson Ram Singh

The person charging this material is responsible for

Tomato Variety Descriptions

Sweet Corn. Cornucopia of Leftovers Starting with Sweet Corn. What will we learn today? Commonly asked questions. we eat it as a vegetable

HARD RED SPRING WHEAT

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

Bloomify Red and Bloomify Rose, Two Infertile Lantana camara Cultivars for Production and Use in Florida 1

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Haskap: The shape of things to come? by Dr. Bob Bors

Hybrid Seeds Production

PROBATION AND FOUNDATION PLOT PRODUCTION OF CANOLA, MUSTARD, RADISH, RAPESEED, SAFFLOWER, AND SUNFLOWER

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Jade II Bean. Inspiration Bean. Wyatt Bean. Emerald Jewel Broccoli. BC-63 Cabbage 3/21/2012. Must Have Vegetables

Selecting Collard Varieties Based on Yield, Plant Habit and Bolting 1

Vivekanandan, K. and G. D. Bandara. Forest Department, Rajamalwatta Road, Battaramulla, Sri Lanka.

Soybean ND Benson (tested as ND ) Data

Insect Screening Results

Chapter V SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

varieties had marginally higher sucrose levels than Golden Jubilee (3.7 % vs 3.1 %) while the supersweet varieties had much

Catalogue of published works on. Maize Lethal Necrosis (MLN) Disease

Some Common Insect Enemies

RUST RESISTANCE IN WILD HELIANTHUS ANNUUS AND VARIATION BY GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN

Western Regional Dry Pea, Lentil and Chickpea Trials

COMPARISON OF BLACKLINE RESISTANT AND CONVENTIONAL ENGLISH WALNUT VARIETIES

Corn Growth and Development

TECHNICAL QUESTIONNAIRE STRAWBERRY

VEGETABLES & STRAWBERRIES (Subject to Availability)

Corn Information for North Carolina Corn Growers

VARIETY GUIDE. eanut varieties of today have resistance to multiple diseases, but the

Bernadine Strik, Professor, Oregon State University 1

VAPOR-HEAT TREATMENT FOR FRUITS AND VEGETABLES GROWN IN HAWAII

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Plant Profiles: HORT 2242 Landscape Plants II

Discrimination of Ruiru 11 Hybrid Sibs based on Raw Coffee Quality

A REPORT OF THE NATIONAL SMALL GRAIN VARIETY REVIEW BOARD

A new tomato for Ontario A large project aims to create on-the-vine greenhouse tomatoes optimized for Ontario growing conditions and consumers

Spring Canola Variety Performance in Iowa 2007 Final Report

HARVESTING MAXIMUM VALUE FROM SMALL GRAIN CEREAL FORAGES. George Fohner 1 ABSTRACT

Pollination of Vegetable Crops

Bulletin 2: Hazelnut Varieties

TEXAS A&M PLANT BREEDING Bulletin September 2011

Global Perspectives Grant Program

Name. AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III May 4, points possible

Pro user:t. A High " Quality. Plum For the Commercial Market

Description of CDC Tatra and CDC Yon spring emmer wheat cultivars.

Title: Cultivar Evaluation for Control of Common Smut in Sweet Corn and High Plains Virus in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington.

Common Pepper Cultivars for Florida Production 1

2018 Small Fruit Plant Sale Variety Information

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

2017 Annual 4-H Plant Sale

Agriculture & Natural Resources

Transcription:

Hawaii H38 and Hawaii H68: Hawaiian Sweet Corn Hybrids JAMES L. BREWBAKER Circular No. 66 Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station University of Hawaii / June 1968

COVER PHOTO: Philip and Pamela Brewbaker sample the new Hawaiian sweet corn hybrid, Hawaii H68.

CONTENTS PAGE ORIGIN 5 DESCRIPTION OF HA WAH H38 AND ITS PARENTS ------------ -- - - 6 DESCRIPTION OF HA WAH H68 AND ITS PARENTS -- 9 SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN PERFORMANCE, HAWAll H38 AND HAW All H68 - -- 9 SEEDSTOCKS AND SEED PRODUCTION... 11 THE AUTHOR Dr. James L. Brewbaker is Horticulturist at the Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station and Professor of Horticulture, College of Tropical Agriculture, University of Hawaii.

FIGURE 1. Dr. Albert J. Mangelsdorf, breeder of Hawaiian Sugar sweet corn, and noted sugarcane geneticist and breeder.

.. Hawaii H38 and Hawaii H68: Hawaiian Sweet Corn Hybrids JAMES L. BREWBAKER Hawaii H38 and Hawaii H68 are the first sweet corn hybrids to be released by the Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station and were bred for yearround adaptability to the tropics. They derive a high winter-yielding capacity and resistance to earworms and mosaic from a new Hawaiian inbred, AA8. High quality is contributed by mainland inbred parents P39 and 442. Hawaii H38 and Hawaii H68 significantly outyield mainland hybrids through most of the year in Hawaii and have performed creditably in commercial tests. ORIGIN Hawaii H38 and Hawaii H68 are single-cross sweet corn hybrids produced by the author and evaluated throughout the State of Hawaii with the assistance of Dr. J. A. Crozier and Dr. P. J. Ito of the Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station. The hybrids are derived from crosses of a new Hawaiian inbred, AA8, with mainland inbreds, P39 and 442, respectively: Hybrid Seed Parent Male Parent Hawaii H38 AA8 (University of Hawaii) P39 (Purdue University) Hawaii H68 AA8 (University of Hawaii) 442 (University of Illinois) The Hawaiian inbred AA8 was bred from the variety, Hawaiian Sugar,1 and has been an exceptionally good parent for hybrids with mainland inbred lines. Hawaiian Sugar is probably the best tropically adapted yellow sweet corn variety, and was bred by Dr. Albert J. Mangelsdorf (Figure 1) of the Hawaiian Sugar Planters' Association from crosses of USDA34 and Golden Cross Bantam. Illustrating the genetic diversity between Hawaiian and mainland lines is the fact that Golden Cross Bantam is dwarfed to 2 or 3 feet in height under midwinter conditions in the warm tropics, while Hawaiian Sugar fails to flower at all, or flowers too late for commercial harvest when grown in the Corn Belt. IA description of this breeding program appears in Brewbaker, James L., 1965, Breeding Sweet Corn Hybrids for Hawaii, Hawaii Farm Science 14(1): 1-4. 5

DESCRIPTION OF HAWAII H38"AND ITS PARENTS Hawaii H38 is a highly productive hybrid selected especially for its exceptional tenderness and sweetness (see Table 1). It is early by Hawaiian Sugar standards, maturing in about 70 days, and should be picked within 18 or 19 days of silk emergence for maximum quality. Ears are small (5~ to 7 inches) with slender cobs, tight husks, and short husk tips (Figures 2, 3). Plants usually bear two marketable ears and often have a third ear. Quality, uniformity, and yield of Hawaii H38 exceed those of the variety, Hawaiian Sugar. Hawaii H38 is quite resistant to earworms and sweet corn mosaic,2 but relatively susceptible to Helminthosporium leaf blight (H. turcicum). Colllpared with mainland hybrids that have been evaluated in Hawaii,3 Hawaii H38 and Hawaii H68 excel in earworm and mosaic resistance. TABLE 1. Plant and ear characters of Hawaiian sweet corn hybrids Hawaii H38 and Hawaii H68 and their parents under typical summer lowland conditions in Hawaii. Ratings follow those of Brewbaker et al., 1966 (see footnote 3), with 1 best, 5 worst HAWAII HAWAII CHARACTER H38 H68 P39 442 AAS Days to harvest... 72 Plant height (feet)... 7.5 Height to base upper ear (feet)... 3.0 Number of leaves per plant... 14 Number of suckers per plant... 1.5 Number of ears per plant... 2.5 Ear length (inches)... 6.5 Kernel row number... 12-14 Length of husk leaves (inches)... 2.0 Ear weight, unhusked (pounds)... 0.52 Ear weight, husked (pounds)... 0.31 Silk color (outside)... Green Silk color (inside)... White Anther and Glume color... Green Resistance to earworm... 1.5 Resistance to blight... 3-4 Resistance to corn mosaic... 2 75 8.5 3.5 14-15 0 2.0 7.5 14-16 0.5 0.62 0.36 Red White Red 1.5 3-4 2 65 4.0 1.5 9-10 3.5 2.5 4.0 12 4.0 Green White Green 4 5 5 69 6.5 3.0 13 1.5 2.0 4.5 12 2.0 Red Tan Red 3 5 5 75 7.0 2.5 14 0 1.5 5.5 12 0.0 Green White Green 1.5 3 1 The parents of Hawaii H38 are the respected Purdue inbred, P39, and the new University of Hawaii inbred, AAB (see Table 1). P39 was bred from the variety, Golden Bantam, by Dr. Glenn M. Smith at Purdue University. P39 and its closely allied inbreds (IP39, P39-5, P39A, C30, etc. ) grow 4 feet or less in Hawaii and tiller profusely in more or less dwarfed rosettes. Pollen production is good in summer months and is prolonged due to pollen release by flowering tillers. P39 is not a satisfactory seed parent in Hawaii. Winter stunt- 2Brewbaker, J. L., and F. Aquilizan. 1965. Genetics of resistance in maize to a mosaicstripe virus transmitted by Peregrinus maidis. Crop Science 5(5): 412-415. 3Brewbaker, J. L., J. A. Crozier, Jr., P. J. Ito, and D. D. F. Williams. 1966. Performance trials of commercial sweet corn hybrids and varieties in Hawaii, 1962-1965. Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station, Technical Progress Report No. 149. 22 pp. 6

FIGURE 2. Husked ears of new Hawaiian sweet corn hybrids Hawaii H68 (above) and Hawaii H38 (below). 7

co FIGURE 3. Unhusked ears of new Hawaiian sweet corn hybrids Hawaii H38 (left) and Hawaii H68 (right).

ing can reduce P39 to a 2-foC:t dwa'.rf: and it is extremely susceptible to mosaic, earworm, and blight. AA8 ( pedigree, A 19-6-1-1-1-1 ) was inbred from the variety, Hawaiian Sugar, with which it shares the tolerance of tropical winter daylengths and high night temperatures, the resistance to mosaic, and the tight husk and earworm resistance. The inbreeding was initiated in 1960 by Dr. Donald C. McGuire of the Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station and continued in 1961 by the author. Hawaiian Sugar was bred from crosses of a Puerto Rican sweet corn, USDA 34 ( which was noted for its resistance to mosaic-stripe virus), and Golden Cross Bantam, whose parents are P39 and P51. AA8 makes an excellent seed parent for the production of hybrid Hawaii H38. DESCRIPTION OF HAWAII H68 AND ITS PARENTS Hawaii H68 is a productive hybrid selected especially for its comparatively large ( 6Y2- to 8-inch) ears and high quality. It is a tall hybrid, especially in summer months (Figure 4), and matures 1 to 4 days later than Hawaii H38. Yields of marketable ears on Hawaii H68 approach or equal Hawaii H38, but the ears are heavier and longer (Figure 2, Table 1), and have shorter husk tips (Figure 3). Resistance to pests and diseases is comparable to that of Hawaii H38. These two hybrids have performed creditably elsewhere in the tropics ( e.g., Philippines, Guam, Puerto Rico). The parents of Hawaii H68 are inbreds 442 (University of Illinois) and AA8 (University of Hawaii). The inbred 442 was bred by Dr. Walter A. Huelsen of the University of Illinois from crosses involving CC5, a field corn inbred, and Illinois 104c and 104q, inbreds from Narrow Grain Evergreen X Unknown Yellow. It is later, taller, and more vigorous in the tropics than most mainland inbreds. It bears few tillers and has two ears with comparatively tight husks and red silks. It is relatively susceptible to earworms and blight, and highly susceptible to mosaic. Hawaiian inbred AA8 has been described m the preceding section. SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN PERFORMANCE, HAWAII H38 AND HAWAII H68 The principal reason for the failure of winter sweet corn production in Hawaii is the short daylength stunting of temperate hybrids. Plant heights are reduced about 50 percent in winter months and ear lengths are shortened measurably. Mosaic damage also increases in the winter, apparently as a result of increasing leafhopper populations. Earworm and blight damage also increases in the wetter months ( typically, November to April). Sweetness ratings may decrease significantly during overcast winter periods. In contrast, the vigor and quality of tropical sweet corn varieties such as Hawaiian Sugar, Pajimaca, and Chiripo Dulce are affected only slightly by shortened winter daylengths. Hybrids Hawaii H38 and Hawaii H68 have yielded well under a wide range of conditions in Hawaii and are shortened less than 25 percent by winter 9

FIGURE 4. Hawaiian sweet corn hybrid Hawaii H68 growing in April in Waimanalo Experimental Farm. Mr. Herbert S. Waki, Farm Manager, holds 8-foot measure. 10

daylengths. Winter yields of Hawaii. H38 and Hawaii H68 at low elevations exceeded by 15 to 85 percent those of Golden Security ( check variety) in 2- years' tests. Days to harvest (at low elevations) vary between 63 and 75 days for Hawaii H38 and between 66 and 78 days for Hawaii H68. Prolonged cool weather at elevations above 1000 feet can delay harvest to more than 100 days. Pericarp thickness under these conditions increases significantly and blight damage increases. SEEDSTOCKS AND SEED PRODUCTION Seeds of Hawaii H38 and Hawaii H68 are available from the University of Hawaii, Department of Horticulture. Small amounts of seed of the inbred AAS may also be obtained. Seed production in Hawaii should be made with AAS as female parent, planted 7 to 10 days prior to the male parent. It is unlikely that AAS would flower early enough for seed production in Corn Belt states. 11

UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII COLLEGE OF TROPICAL AGRICULTURE HAWAII AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION HONOLULU, HAWAII THOMAS H. HAMILTON President of the University C. PEAIRS WILSON Dean of the College and Director of the Experiment Station G. DONALD SHERMAN Associate Director of the Experiment Station