'r'éiion VeiucfaIIe Ikiest

Similar documents
rciion egelaihe D Sweet corn varieties tested

1973 SWEET CORN CULTIVAR TRIALS GREEN SPRINGS CROPS RESEARCH UNIT

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

EVALUATION OF SWEET CORN CULTIVARS

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

~culture Series No. 5~

Edamame Variety Trial Report 1999

2008 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

varieties had marginally higher sucrose levels than Golden Jubilee (3.7 % vs 3.1 %) while the supersweet varieties had much

1

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

Edamame Variety Trial Phone: Fax: Materials and Methods

0\ Horticuilture Series 609 January 1990

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS. Department of Horticulture

The Pomology Post. Hull Rot Management on Almonds. by Brent Holtz, Ph.D., University of California Pomology Advisor

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

EVALUATION OF FOURTEEN TOMATO CULTIVARS IN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN Ron Goldy & Virginia Wendzel Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center

THE EVALUATION OF WALNUT VARIETIES FOR CALIFORNIA S CENTRAL COAST REGION 2007 HARVEST

PLANTING WHEAT SEED DAMAGED BY FROST BEFORE HARVEST

EVALUATION OF GRAPE AND CHERRY TOMATOES IN NORTHERN NEW JERSEY 2003

Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data. Hartmann, R. W. (Richard William), "Poamoho" pole bean.

PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

Organic Seed Partnership

Sorghum Yield Loss Due to Hail Damage, G A

PERFORMANCE OF FOUR FORAGE TURNIP VARIETIES AT MADRAS, OREGON, J. Loren Nelson '

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Klamath Experiment Station

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

2013 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

CAULIFLOWER TRIAL,

Pepper Research for Adaptation to the Delmarva Region 2017

Report of Progress 961

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

Slicing Cucumber Performance in Southwest Michigan

2014 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VAREITY TRIAL REPORT. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015

Retailing Frozen Foods

SELF-POLLINATED HASS SEEDLINGS

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

Yield, Income, Quality, and Blotchy Ripening Susceptibility of Staked Tomato Cultivars in Central Kentucky

Dd-#eluhgo S g. -ie lo : 3 Apg 1. Meaemet I-, Agcf~r. 0 - ~ tio AtSr * 0res. ;# I- en, s Ous.: e a S u lsi a a

RUST RESISTANCE IN WILD HELIANTHUS ANNUUS AND VARIATION BY GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

WATERMELON AND CANTALOUPE VARIETY TRIALS, PO Box 8112, GSU Statesboro, GA

Carol A. Miles, Ph. D., Agricultural Systems Specialist 1919 NE 78 th Street Vancouver, Washington 98665

Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations in West Virginia

Niche Market Dry Bean Variety Trial Materials and Methods

Barley, Oat, and Wheat Varieties

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

HISTORY USES AND HEALTH BENEFITS. Figure 31. Nanking cherries

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

2011 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox and Phil Atkins Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Processing Peach Cultivar Evaluations 2004 Progress Report

NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY:

ALBINISM AND ABNORMAL DEVELOPMENT OF AVOCADO SEEDLINGS 1

Evaluation of Organic Cucumber, and Summer and Winter Squash Varieties for Certified Organic Production Neely- Kinyon Trial, 2005

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

USDA Sanitary Phytosanitary Project

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Yield Comparisons of Bt and Non-Bt Corn Hybrids in Missouri in 1999

Variety Name Seed Company Variety Name Seed Company. BHN 589 Seedway Mt. Merit Seedway. BHN 967 Siegers Seed Company Primo Red Harris Seed Company

Buying Filberts On a Sample Basis

2002 NEW JERSEY CHERRY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1 INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Evaluation of 15 Specialty Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels

Hawaii H38 and Hawaii H68: Hawaiian Sweet Corn Hybrids

2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County

Testing Tomato Hybrids for Heat Tolerance at West Tennessee Experiment Station, Jim E. Wyatt and Craig H. Canaday. Interpretative Summary

Assessment of Specialty Potatoes for Powdery Scab Resistance

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

Name. AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III May 4, points possible

Title: Control of Wild Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in 'Jubilee' Sweet Corn in the Willamette Valley, 1987.

What Effect do Nitrogen Fertilization Rate and Harvest Date Have on Cranberry Fruit Yield and Quality?

MANOA WONDER, NEW ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE RESISTANT POLE BEAN

Volunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat year two. Mark Thorne, Henry Wetzel, Drew Lyon, Tim Waters

Transcription:

'r'éiion VeiucfaIIe Ikiest 0- COLLECT(ON Volume 23 Oregon State University, January 1974 Number 1 Sweet corn hybrids evaluated for head smut resistance Resistance to head smut, caused by the fungus Spacelotheca reilianum, has become an important factor to consider in sweet corn variety evaluation. The disease is a limiting factor in yield in many Western Oregon locations and has forced farmers to abandon some fields for sweet corn production. Considering the susceptibility range of all varieties available, the major commercial hybrid, 'Jubilee' is only moderately susceptible. However, this level of susceptibility has apparently permitted a build-up of the smut fungus, accounting for the current problem. Though varieties with much greater resistance have been recognized for several years, the iii Zkis issue.. Sweet corn hybrids evaluated for head smut resistance 1 Bean varieties screened for rust resistance 3 Row spacing affects bush bean yields in Northeast Oregon 4 Early eggplant varieties tested for Western Oregon conditions 5 production and quality characteristics of 'Jubilee' have made it difficult to replace in both processing and fresh market operations. In both 1972 and 1973, varieties included in sweet corn trials at Corvallis were also tested for smut resistance in two infested commercial fields. One near Scio, Oregon, providi smut infection both years. The other plantings, near Corvallis, were in two fields which had a history of bad losses from smut. However, infection was obtained only in the 1972 test. Tables 1 and 2 show a well-defined range of susceptibility among varieties, even though a great variability in the tests is also apparent. This variation, the result of the long plot areas crossing spots of high and low infection intensity in the field, may be due to several factors which have not been identified. Soil moisture may directly affect the infection process, or factors affecting plant growth may indirectly influence the percent of infection. these tests, a plant was counted as infected if there was any detectable symptom, which could range from heavy sporulation in the tassel or ear to a few affected kernels, or could consist of stunting with no normal ear development. (Continued on next page) In

Outstanding varieties observed during the two years are 'Goldie', 'Triumphant II', 'Exp 1791', '70-2367', '70-1717', 'Code 570', 'Gold Crown', 'Commander'. This is an arbitrary list and others such as 'Stylepak' are also resistant to a useful degree. Other varieties, such as 'Sugar Daddy', 'Spring Gold', and 'XP 1330' are highly susceptible and should not be planted where smut is present. Sources of varieties listed in the tables are as follows: Rogers Bros., P.O. Box 2188, Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401 Harris Seeds, Moreton Farm, Rochester, New York 14624 Ferry Morse Seed Company, Box 967, Mountain View, California 94040 --J. Asgrow Seed Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001 Northrup King and Company, 1500 Jackson St. NE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 Niagra Seeds, Western Research, P.O. Box 2508, El Macero, California 95618 Charter Seed Company, P.O. Box 191, Twin Falls, Idaho 83301 0 and G Seed Company, P.O. Box 787, Caldwell, Idaho 83605 R. Baggett h'orti culture Department Table 1. Head Smut Susceptibility Trials, Scio and Corvallis, Oregon, 1972 Corvallis1 Sciob Overall Variety Source 1 2 3 4 Avg. 1 2 Ti 4 Avg. Average 70-2416 1 16 12 12 48 22 54 35 36 32 37 29 Gold Crown 2 25 24 9 14 18 24 32 24 18 24 21 68-2631 1 4 4 4 8 5 25 0 18 0 11 8 E 1502 3 25 8 13 8 14 17 8 15 14 13 13 Stylepak 3 29 17 25 0 18 0 4 0 0 1 9 XP1330 4 25 54 6 29 29 53 50 47 24 43 36 Sugar Daddy 3 42 38 26 42 37 78 79 90 79 82 59 51036 5 16 38 21 29 26 22 22 26 14 21 23 NCX 2004 6 8 16 13 8 11 10 15 16 13 13 12 Gold Winner 2 0 4 17 8 7 20 23 4 4 13 10 Gold Cup 2 4 9 4 13 B 23 14 22 32 23 15 70-2428 1 12 28 4 20 16 41 54 35 12 36 26 63-1986 1 17 8 13 8 11 20 14 14 10 14 13 Trail Blazer Northern Belle 3 2 36 46 48 40 22 29 50 32 39 37 50 28 76 37 58 36 56 38 60 35 49 36 Goldie 5 0 16 4 12 8 9 14 4 9 9 9 Earlibelle 2 20 4 8 27 15 65 44 67 38 53 34 Yukon 5 29 38 20 32 30 38 26 32 5 25 27 FM Cross 3 24 33 8 20 21 10 9 24 25 19 20 Jubilee 1 28 36 40 9 28 39 58 35 20 38 33 Code 558 7 21 25 8 4 14 33 38 52 13 34 24 Code 596 7 26 4 0 16 12 23 29 50 20 31 21 64-2454 1 16 40 0 8 16 4 9 25 10 12 14 Code 556 7 8 16 8 0 8 8 18 13 25 16 12 Code 560 7 12 8 0 8 7 10 14 12 22 14 11 Ex 668 5 8 13 6 4 8 5 14 19 12 12 10 Code 550 7 24 8 24 24 20 32 21 27 29 27 24 Golden Cross B. - 22 29 17 8 19 0 9 4 9 6 12 Controls3 45 30 14 20 28 30 22 13 16 20 Location average (excluding controls) 18 26 LPlots 20 ft. long with 18-24 plants, arranged in 4 rows in randomized blocks 140 feet long (plot area 560 feet lodg). Planted Nay 26, readings on August 23. 2plots 22 ft. long with 18-24 plants, arranged in 2 rows in randomized blocks 250 ft. long (plot area 1000 ft. long). Planted May 29, readings on August 24. 3Controls from commercial crop surrounding plots. Jubilee at Corvallis, Stylepak at Scio. An average of 8 plots, one from each side of the plot area for each replication. Oregon Vegetable Digest is published four times a year by the Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Corvallis, G. Burton Wood, Director. Address correspondence to the author concerned or to the Department of Horticulture. Material may be reprinted providing no endorsement of a commercial product is stated or implied. Please credit Oregon State TJniversity. To simplify technical terminology, trade names of products or equipment sometimes will be used. No endorsement of products named is intended, nor is criticism implied of products not mentioned. 2

Table 2. Head Smut Susceptibility Trial, Scio, Oregon, 19731 1 Infection 1972-' Commerc. Plots4 No. Vane ty Source Rep 1 Rej2 Rep 3 Ren 4 Avg. Avg. Avg. % Inf. 1 Goldie 5 0 11.8 0 0 2.9 9 2 Code 560 7 0 28.6 7.1 0 8.9 11 3 E1502 3 4.7 11.1 0 0 3.9 13 9 4 Sugar Daddy 3 0 66.7 60.0 36.8 40.9 59 5 NCX242 6 12.5 5.5 7.1 9.1 8.5 6 81206 8 0 7.7 0 0 1.9 7 Code 540 7 11.1 0 6.7 0 4.4 8 Blitz 2 0 0 6.2 6.7 3.2 9- Triumphant II A 79 0 0 0 1.8 10 Exp. 1791 5 5.9 0 0 5.9 2.9 11 70-236 7 1 0 5.9 0 0 1.5 7.0 12 S_pring Gold 2 46.7 47.1 46.7 5.5 36.5 13 Style.pak 3 10.5 4.8 5.9 0 5.3 9 5.5 14 Cade 577 7 4 g 11.1 14.3 23.6 2 15 NCX 245 6 5.5 14.3 25.0 8.3 13. 3 16 Trail Blazer 3 33.3 29.9 18.3 ' 1 49 17 Yukon 5 30.0 6.3 20.0 23.6 20. 0 27 18 Strndance 2 38 1 64.3 58.8 55.5 5 19 71-1962 1 41:2 5.3 17.7 0 16.0 20 Code 545 7 26.7 43.8 8.3 10.5 22.3 21 JubIlee 1 23.8 0 11.8 10.0 11.4 33 22 NCX234 6 0 5.3 6.7 0 3.0 23 70-1631 1 0 22.7 0 9.1 7.9 24 70-1717 1 0 0 0 0 0 25 Sweet Sue 2 8.3 4.4 0 5.0 4.4 26 Exp. 668 5 0 30.0 18.8 7.1 14.0 24 27 NCX 2004 6 12.5 9.5 0 0 5.5 12 2 28 70-2428 1 9.1 19.0 15.4 9.5 13.2 26 29 Code 570 7 0 0 30 twiji 2 70.0 53.3 0 68.7 0 42.9 0 58.1 31 Golden - Bantam 5 19.2 11.8 12.4 check2 3 90 1011 8.0 7.2 Commander 4 XP1335 4 8.8 X1P1330 4 33.0 i-plot area was two rows, 1,000 feet long; each variety was in four 22-ft. plots, with 15-25 plants/plot, arranged in randomized blocks. Planted: June 11, 1973. Infection recorded Sept. 11, 1973. 2Check variety score was from the crop of 'Stylepak' surrounding the plots. For each replication one 22-ft. plot on each side of the plots was counted and averaged for the score shown. 3Average from two locations, one in the same field at Scio, one from Corvallis. 4Averages of eight 25-plant plots, randomly taken from commercial trials in the same field at Scio, 1973. Bean varieties screened for rust resistance Since bush snap beans have largely replaced pole varieties in the Willamette Valley, the bean rust disease (Uromyces phaseoli) has not been much of a problem. This is chiefly because most bush beans complete their growth during the hottest and driest part of the year and the short growing season provides only a brief time when rust can build up and cause damage. All the bush bean varieties have had some screening for disease resistance and most have a fair degree of resistance to certain races of the rust fungus. Studies conducted in the greenhouse indicated, however, that under conditions favorable to the disease, or when large numbers of rust spores are present, many bush bean varieties may become infected. Frequent surveys during the last 15 years have revealed only a single race of Uromyces phaseoli, race 33, in Western Oregon. In pole beans, rust is common, particularly late in the season. In bush beans, the disease is seldom seen except in very late plantings when the plants are less vigorous and are exposed to infection for a relatively long time. The purpose of these field tests was to determine the relative susceptibility of commonly grown bush bean varieties and some breeding lines to natural infection when exposed to heavy "disease pressura" Each plot consisted of a single row of the test line with an artificially inoculated hill of the susceptible 'Pinto UI 111' 3 feet from each end of the row. Each test row was thus exposed to large numbers of air-borne spores from both ends. The entire test area was surrounded by 2 rows of corn as a windbreak, and the plots were irrigated frequently, using overhead sprinklers. No cultivating equipment was moved through the test area after emergence of the bean seedlings. The plots were seeded May 25, 1973, and disease readings were made August 15, when the pods were fairly mature. The most heavily infected leaves were selected from plants near the center of each row. Readings, therefore, show the maximum disease 3

severity at the greatest distance from the source of inoculum. A. card having a hole 1 cm square was placed over a section of the leaf lamina and the number of pustules in the exposed area recorded. In Table 1. Development of rust (Uromyces phaseoli) in bush snap beans exposed to natural field infections under conditions of high infection potential, August 15, 1973 Mean number of2 - Size of Cultivar p ustules per cm pus tules ye howing Pinto UI 111* 45.8 Large Severe Very poor BC 16 8 24,8 Small Slight Variable B4840-7-2-1 23.8 Small Moderate Good 2751 23.4 Variable Severe Variable BBL 290* 22. 6 Medium Slight Good 2217-2-3 21.5 sma 11 Slight Variable 2665 20.5 Medium Severe Variab 1$ 1851-3-12 20. 4 Variable Slight Poor l90l7 19.5 Large Slight Variable 2217-29-2-1-1 17.6 Medium Slight Var iable Ore. 1604* 16.3 Small None Exce ilent 1963-7-7-1 15. 3 La rge Moderate Good Ore. 5 8* 14.1 Medium None Excellent 222 4-5 13.8 Variable Slidit Variable 5 8-BC-4-1-1 12.4 Variable None Excellent TempQ* 12.3 Large Shi ght Variable 1752 9.9 Large None Exce ilent B4840-8-2-1 9.4 Variable None Exce 11ent Gallatin 50* 1. 9 Small None Excellent *Commercjal varieties; all others are Oregon State University breeding lines. Although we seldom see rust on any of the snap bean varieties grown in Western Oregon, none is immune and, given favorable conditions for infection, an outbreak of rust of epidemic proportions is possible. In the table, a variety with less than 10 pustules per cm2 would be considered highly resistant, one with less than 15 per cm2 resistant and one with 20 or more per 2 would be considered susceptible to infection by our common rust race 33. Fortunately, most of the varieties tested had a degree of resistance to rust. 'Gallatin 50' was by far the most resistant of the snap bean varieties tested. The few pustules that were present were very small, with no yellow halo and no general yellowing of the leaf lamina. None of the snap beans tested approached the dry bean 'Pinto UI 111' in susceptibility. It required only casual observation to distinguish the 'Gallatin 50' and 'Pinto UI 111' plots from all others. Highest yields of bush beans were obtained In closer row spacings tested in Umatilla County in 1973. Row spacings used in two experimental plantings were 7, 14, 21, and 28-inches. Seeding rates were adjusted to increase the number of plants per foot of row as the row width increased. Plant populations at harvest time were 113, 81, 80, and 66 thousand plants per acre for the 7, 14, 21, and 28- inch rows. Plant populations for the three wider row spacings were less than intended. Prior to planting, Trifluralin (3/4 pound/acre) and two rates of fertilizer were incorporated into the soil. Fertilizer rates were 40-60-0-30-10 and 80-120-0-30-10 pounds N, P205, K20, S, and Zn per acre to each row spacing. 'Wondergreen 452' bush beans supplied by Rogers Walla Walla, Inc., were planted in early June. Irrigation water was applied via sprinklers. The 4 addition, appearance of the infected leaves and relative size of the pustules was recorded. Results of the tests are given in Table 1. Foliar B4840-F 19.2 Laree None Poor There was remarable uniformity in the number of rust pustules per cm for any particular variety. On the other hand, in some varieties the size of pustu1 and the general appearance of the infected plants varied greatly, possibly indicating that the line was segregating for these characteristics. Greenhouse inoculation of bean breeding lines to determine resistance to rust is a useful procedure, making it possible to eliminate many susceptible lines and to select lines with a high degree of resistance. It is believed, however, that testing for natural infection under field conditions provides a more reliable estimate of the probable performance of a variety under commercial growing conditions. --Edward K. Vaughan Botany and Plant Pathology Department General appearance of plants Row spacing affects bush bean yields in NE Oregon once-over hand harvesting the last of August consisted of counting all plants in a plot and picking and weighing all marketable pods. Sieve size distributiat was determined by putting all pods through a grader at Rogers Wahla Walla plant in Nilton-Freewater. The highest yields were obtained from the narrowest row spacings in each experiment (Table 1). Yields declined rapidly as the row spacings increased with the lowest yields being harvested from the 28- inch rows. Statistical differences in yields in Experiment 1 were measured between the 7, 14, and 21-inch row spacings. The loss of several plots in Experiment 2 prevented the analyzing of that experiment statistically. Blooming and pod set during the growing season were observed to be extended over a longer period of time than usual. This is borne Out by data of sieve size distribution (Table 1). The large percentage of size 1 and 2 pods and low percentage of size 4 suport

the field observations. Row spacing had no obvious effect on sieve size distribution of the pods at harvest. No visible differences in growth and color were observed during the growing season which could be attributed to the two rates of fertilizer applied. No difference in yield due to fertilizer was measured. Soil test values showed each soil to be reasonably well supplied with nitrate nitrogen, available phosphorus, and potassium. Available nitrogen as nitrates was approximately 130 and 160 pounds per acre for Experiments 1 and 2 respectively. Table 1. Results of two years' experimental work indicate the yield of bush beans could be increased 40 percent or more by planting rows spaced 7 to 14 inches apart compared to the wider spacing now used. --F. V. Pumphrey Columbia Basin Research Center --D. J. Burkhart Umatilla Extension Agent --N. S. Mansour Extension Vegetable Specialist Yield and sieve size of 'Wondergreen 452' bush beans from four row spacings, Columbia Basin Research Center, 1973 Row Spacing Inches 7 14 21 28 LSD 5% EXPERIMENT 1 Yield Tons! Acre 1&2 5.6 21 5.0 20 3.6 19 3.3 21 0.5 Sieve Size Percent EXPERIMENT 2 Yield Tons! Sieve Size Percent Acre 4.2 19 28 44 3.5 2.8 2.5 3 4 5&6 1&2 3 4 5&6 24 40 14 9 24 41 15 24 27 38 11 22 38 21 19 27 39 15 22 37 20 15 26 48 11 Early eggplant varieties tested for Western Oregon conditions The eggplant is a very marginal crop in Western Oregon because of its high heat requirement for fruit set and development. Even with black plastic mulch, which appears to improve fruit production, popular varieties produce very sparse and variable crops. Most seed firms in the United States list the popular large-fruited varieties, such as 'Black Beauty', which are egg-shaped and have attractive purpleblack color. Because previous trials have indicated that some other types were more adapted to the ares, a few varieties were grown in 1973 without plastic mulch to observe earliness and production. The trial was a small one, with 5 plants of each variety in a 12-foot plot. Greenhouse grown transplants were set Out on May 11 into rows with 600 lb.!acre banded 8-24-8 fertilizer. Irrigation was applied every 7-10 days during the summer. Estimates of performance were made by picking all usable sized fruits at arbitrarily determined times. Also noted was the date when the first feasible harvest was possible (such as for a home gardener) and when a full crop was mature. Second harvests were made on some early varieties which continued to produce after the first crop was picked. In the table, the varieties are listed in order of the first mature fruits which is slightly different than the order of first harvest. 'Morden Midget', 'Money Maker No. 1' and 'Money Maker No. 2' are distinctly early. 'Short Tom', 'Long Tom', 'No. 29', and 'Black Jack' are also early when yield of their first harvest on September 13 is considered. Of these 7 varieties, 'No. 29' and 'Black Jack' produce generally typical large, egg-shaped fruits, and those of 'Morden Midget' are also egg-shaped but much smaller. 'Black Jack' was probably the outstanding variety for a combination of fruit type and earliness. The remaining 4 early varieties bear slender fruits which are equal in quality, but are not of the type popular in the United States. If seed companies in this country were to list them, home gardeners or local market growers would do well to try these varieties. The dwarf, early 'Morden Midget' is available from at least one retail source and should permit home gardeners to succeed in many areas where standard varieties fail. Sources of varieties in the trial: Geo. W. Parke Seed Co., P.O. Box 31, Greenwood, South Carolina 29646 Takii and Co., Ltd., P.O. Box 7, Kyoto Central, Kyoto, Japan T. Sakata & Co., c,'o Herbst Bros. Seedsmen, Inc., 1000 Main Street, Brewster, New York 10509 Stokes Seed Ltd., Box 548, Buffalo, New York 14240 Agway, Inc., Ithaca, New York 14850 W. Atlee Burpee Co., Box 748, Riverside, California 92502 Joseph Harris Co., Moreton Farm, Rochester, New York 14624 --J. R. Baggett Norticulture Department

Eggplant Variety Observations, Corvallis, Oregon, 1973 let Main the. per plant No. fruit per plant Avg. Vartety Source ripe crop 8-31 9-13 9-25 10-4 Total 9-31 9-13 9-25 10-A Total Wt. Notes Morden Midget 1 7-26 8-17 5.6 4.2 9.8 7.3 6.6 13.9 0.71 Poor, light, streaked color; broad egg Money Ma16Y92 2 8-4 8-2 El 5.3 13.6 14.5 19.5 34.0 J'() a ape var a. a, some cr00 a., color unit, purple None Maker #1 2 8-5 4-25 2 5.6 10.8 9,n IT,O 21.0 0.51 Si. rougher fhan Hone Maker P2. lighter y P color: some rrmnkad Short Tom 3 8-4 8-31 7.0 1.8 8.6 15.5 5.8 21.3 0.41 Med. long, many crooked; var. color, black to it. Durnle Long Toe 3 8-4 8-31 9.7 1.7 11.4 23.2 7.5 30.7 0.37 Similar to Short Tom No. 29 3 8-15 9-13 8.6 5,0 11.6 8.9 6.2 14.2 0.82 tar ge egg shape, some broad; fair color, come stripe Stokes Hybrid 4 8-18 9-13 2.8 2.4 5.2 2.5 5.0 7.5 fl.69 Broad egg, fair to good color Black -lack 5 8-20 9-13 7.4 3.6 10.S 5.3 4.6 9.9 1.09 Eg to ned. I ong; good color, good Black Beauty type WRIte Beauty 1 8-21 9-14 5.6 1.0 6.6 8.5 2.2 10.7 0.62 Some green; small, egg shape Large Frui ted #25 3 8-31 9-13 5.6 1.6 7.2 28.8 4.0 32.13 0.22 Near globe shape; color fair - some striped and dull Jersey King Hyb. 6 8-31 - 9.7 1.1 10.8 18.6) 3.0 21.0 0.51 V. tall plant; long pear shape; un med. purple smooth Earle Hybrid 6 9-31 9-15 4.9 4.3 9.2 8.6 7.3 15.9 0.58 Egg to pear; poor color; generally poor Burpee Hybrid 6 9-1 - 8.2 1.0 9.2 10.0 1.5 11.5 0.80 CoccI shape and color; egg shape Special Ilibush 7 9-2 -- 5.2 0.4 5.6 5.0 1.2 6.2 0,90 Long-heavy; very good color; smooth Early Purple 3 9-5 - 3.9 0.8 4.7 9.2 2.5 11.7 0.40 GeneraUy late and poor performance AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION of Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon 97331 Director FREE: Annual Report or Bulletin or Circular or Report of Progress. Permit 1115 POSTMASTER: Please return free if unclaimed. See Postal Laws and Regulations. POSTAGE PAID U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AGR 101 THIRD CLASS BULK RT. U.S.MAIL