RISK MANAGEMENT OF BEER FERMENTATION DIACETYL CONTROL

Similar documents
A new acetolacte decarboxylase for diacetyl control

OBTAINING AND CHARACTERIZATION OF BEERS WITH CHERRIES

EFFECT OF SOME TECHNOLOGICAL FACTORS ON THE CONTENT OF ACETALDEHYDE IN BEER

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE SPEED OF FERMENTATION AND LEVELS OF FLAVOUR COMPOUNDS POST- FERMENTATION

yeast-derived flavours

ENZYME PREPARATION IN SECONDARY FERMENTATION AND MATURATION PROCESS IN BREWING INDUSTRY. Abstract

Beauty and the Yeast - part II

Institute of Brewing and Distilling

TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHEET: CALCIUM CHLORIDE FLAKE - LIQUOR TREATMENT

Chair J. De Clerck IV. Post Fermentation technologies in Special Beer productions Bottle conditioning: some side implications

Evaluation of the Malting and Brewing Performance of the New Canadian Malting Barley Variety Norman

Timing of Treatment O 2 Dosage Typical Duration During Fermentation mg/l Total Daily. Between AF - MLF 1 3 mg/l/day 4 10 Days

Co-inoculation and wine

Unit code: A/601/1687 QCF level: 5 Credit value: 15

Research concerning the use of encapsulated Maturex for beer fermentation

Sensory and Flavor Training for Brewers

Malting and Brewing Trials with 2011 Crop Barley Samples of CDC PolarStar and AC Metcalfe

2013 Crop AAC Synergy Pilot Malting and Brewing Trials

2014 Crop Merit 57 Pilot Malting and Brewing Trials

Analysing the shipwreck beer

CMBTC 2017 Crop MALTING BARLEY QUALITY ASSESSMENT Preliminary Report

FERMENTATION. By Jeff Louella

Sour Beer A New World approach to an Old World style. Brian Perkey Lallemand Brewing

Petite Mutations and their Impact of Beer Flavours. Maria Josey and Alex Speers ICBD, Heriot Watt University IBD Asia Pacific Meeting March 2016

Yeast- Gimme Some Sugar

An Investigation of Methylsufonylmethane as a Fermentation Aid. Eryn Bottens, Jeb Z Hollabaugh, and Thomas H. Shellhammer.

Brewhouse Operations II Influence on yield and quality

Pilot Malting and Brewing Trials with 2011 Crop CDC Meredith Barley

Stuck / Sluggish Wine Treatment Summary

FOOD PRODUCTION - BEVERAGES Demonstrate knowledge of brewhouse operations and wort production

Brewing Tutorial Stove-top partial-boil with specialty grains

2012 Crop CDC Meredith Malting and Brewing Trials

Yeast and Flavour Production. Tobias Fischborn Lallemand Brewing

2012 Crop CDC Kindersley Malting & Brewing Trials

CMBTC 2015 MALTING BARLEY CROP QUALITY ASSESSMENT Preliminary Report

Fresh Beer, Fresh Ideas

ACETALDEHYDE High amount of fermentable sugars

Micro-brewing learning and training program

Oregon Wine Advisory Board Research Progress Report

Dynamic Fermentation with Iso-Mix Rotary Jet Mixing: Optimizing Yeast Viability and System Performance

MIC305 Stuck / Sluggish Wine Treatment Summary

HYDROGEN SULPHIDE FORMATION IN FERMENTING TODDY*

YEAST Wrangling The Many Flavors of Brewing Yeast CURT WITTENBERG FOR SOCIETY OF BARLEY ENGINEERS OCTOBER 4, 2017

An overview of beer flavour and sensory training

Bag-In-Box Package Testing for Beverage Compatibility

Intro to Professional Brewing Quality Assurance. Rick Blankemeier Quality Assurance Manager Stone Brewing Co

MAKING WINE WITH HIGH AND LOW PH JUICE. Ethan Brown New Mexico State University 11/11/2017

Brewing Science. Yeast

The Science of Mashing. Jamie Ramshaw M Brew IBD 25/10/17

Effect of Yeast Propagation Methods on Fermentation Efficiency

Virginie SOUBEYRAND**, Anne JULIEN**, and Jean-Marie SABLAYROLLES*

Basic beer style parameters Quality Control by basic means

Brewing Process all grain

BIOCHEMICAL PROCESSES BY MASHING AND CHARACTERIZATION OF THE FERMENTATION OF FEED BARLEY DURING BREWING

Milk to foreign markets

DR6000 in the Brewing Industry: Important Methods in Accordance with MEBAK and ASBC

Beer Clarity SOCIETY OF BARLEY ENGINEERS 8/2/17 MIKE & LAUREN GAGGIOLI

Getting To Know Your Lacto. Josh Armagost and Dan Ramos The Brewing Science Institute 2016 Rocky Mountain Micro-Brewers Symposium

AN OVERVIEW OF THE BREWING PROCESS. Jared Long Head Brewer Altitude Chophouse and Brewery

Formation of aroma compounds during fermentation -Effects, control, range- VLB Berlin / Burghard Meyer / 5th European MicroBrew Symposium

PRODUCTION OF BEER Page 1

LAGERING WITH THE CONICAL FERMENTER & GLYCOL CHILLER. What is a lager fermentation profile?

Evaluation of the Malting and Brewing Performance the new Canadian Two Row Variety Cerveza

Analytical Report. Table 1: Target compound levels. Concentration units are ppm or N/D, not detected.

Specific Yeasts Developed for Modern Ethanol Production

Oxygen Uptake old problem, new solutions

PRESERVATION METHOD OF YEAST AND PERFORMANCE IN BEER FERMENTATION

Analytical Report. Volatile Organic Compounds Profile by GC-MS in Cupcake Batter Flavor Concentrate

Brewing Water Derek Colby

Professional Analytical Services Catalogue

Qualifications. The Certificate in the Fundamentals of Brewing and Packaging of Beer (FBPB) Full Examination Syllabus

15/03/ :58. Yeast Selection for Beer Diversity

MICROBES MANAGEMENT IN WINEMAKING EGLANTINE CHAUFFOUR - ENARTIS USA

YEAST STARTERS. Brewers make wort, YEAST MAKE BEER. A few keys to turning GOOD homebrew into GREAT homebrew

Colored Malt Products June 23, 2012 Robert Seggewiss 3/07/2012 1

Inside the brewery. How is beer made? Barley Malting. Hop Quality A Brewer s Perspective. Barley Water

Non-Microbial Off Aromas

Micro-brewing learning and training program

Analytical Report. Volatile Organic Compounds Profile by GC-MS in Clove E-liquid Flavor Concentrate. PO Box 2624 Woodinville, WA 98072

Microbiologist. QA Lab at Boulevard Brewing Co. Production QA Member of A.S.B.C. Sensory Specialist, Beer Judge

AN ENOLOGY EXTENSION SERVICE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION

Presented during the Performance BIB meetings in Bristol, England 24 & 25 October By: Tony Hoare

Dryhopping Effectively

CONTENTS. Whisky recipes...7-8

INSTRUCTIONS FOR CO-INOCULATION

CHAPER 2 PROCESS DESCRIPTION

LEHUI MICRO BREWERY EQUIPMENT 2009/ 8

Exploring Attenuation. Greg Doss Wyeast Laboratories Inc. NHC 2012

125 th Anniversary Review: Diacetyl and its control during brewery fermentation

Mashing! How? Why? To what extent?!

Decrease in Hydrogen Sulfide Content during the Final Stage of Beer Fermentation Due to Involvement of Yeast and Not Carbon Dioxide Gas Purging

Understanding yeast to prevent hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) in wine. Enlightened science Empowered artistry. Matthew Dahabieh, PhD

A NEW APPROACH FOR ASSESSING

MULTIVAC BETTER PACKAGING. Multivac Southern Africa

Nitrogen is a key factor that has a significant

Christian Butzke Enology Professor.

How yeast strain selection can influence wine characteristics and flavors in Marquette, Frontenac, Frontenac gris, and La Crescent

Whole Wheat Sourdough Bread With Linseed

For the Oregon Brew Crew March 2013

TESTING WINE STABILITY fining, analysis and interpretation

Transcription:

Buletin USAMV-CN, 62/2006 (303-307) ISSN 1454 2382 RISK MANAGEMENT OF BEER FERMENTATION DIACETYL CONTROL Mudura Elena, SevastiŃa Muste, Maria Tofană, Crina Mureşan elenamudura@yahoo.com University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Mănăştur Street, no.3-5 Key words: beer, diacetyl, maturation, off-flavor Abstract. Diacetyl and 2, 3-pentandione are important contributors to beer flavor. These two compounds are grouped and reported as the vicinal diketone (VDK) content of beer. The removal of diacetyl is an important step in the maturation of beer. Diacetyl is formed by oxidative decarboxylation of α-acetolactate. In the next step of fermentation, diacetyl is transformed to acetoin by enzymatic complex of the yeast. For flavor profile of beer it is very important that the concentration of VDK to be less than flavor threshold. In brewery pilot plant from USAMV Cluj-Napoca production trials were performed to monitoring any influence on beer quality and to optimize saving in time and cost. Four sets of brew trials have been selected as representative examples from the trials performed. INTRODUCTION Diacetyl and 2, 3 pentadione are normal products of yeast metabolism and they are formed in every brewing fermentation. The desire level in the final product depends on the particular flavor which mach the beer profile, but in all types, flavor defect are caused by excessive concentration of diacetyl. Diacetyl and pentanedione have similar tastes and smell, and the flavor is so characteristic that is described as. diacetyl It is also described as butter,. honey The taste and smell varies with concentration and is modified by presence of other substances, as are strong bitterness, malt flavor. The sensorial detection is very difficult because individuals differ in their sensitivity to diacetyl. It seems that the taste for diacetyl in lager beer is about 0.04-0.08 ppm and in all about 0.08-0.4 ppm. The taste threshold for pentanedione is about ten times as high at 0.8 ppm. In lager beer the diacetyl flavor is a defect, but a limited diacety flavor is regarded as desire in some ale. The limit 1.0 ppm seems to be unacceptable. Diacetyl also known as 2, 3 butanedione is produced outside of the yeast cell when the compound α-acetolactate is oxidized by metal ions or dissolved oxygen. During aging, yeast cells absorb diacetyl, use it as a hydrogen donor in biochemical reaction and in the process convert into a flavorless alcohol called 2, 3 butanediol. Diacetyl can also originate from beer

spoilage bacteria, especially Pediococcus and any off-flavor associated with bacterial contamination is not good. Diketone removal depends on the metabolic activity of the yeast and not all yeast strain is able to reduce diacetyl effectively. For a given strain of yeast the efficiency of diacetyl reduction depends on the metabolic state of the yeast. Yeast that has been stored for a long time or has been stored worm, or yeast which is not provided with the proper nutrients, is not able to reduce diacetyl efficiently. MATERIAL AND METHOD Because diacetyl removal is important in achieving an acceptable beer flavor, our pilot plant program for research and development has been directed to optimization and reducing the time of maturation stage. The optimization is complicated by a number of factors that can influence diacetyl formation and removal. These include: the yeast strain, the condition of the pitching yeast, the wort composition, the wort gravity, the process management of the fermentation and the size and the shape of the fermentation vessels.pilot plant fermentations were carried out in unitank process with pilsner type wort, prepared by infusion mashing regime with 100 % malt (figure 1) A bottom fermentation yeast strain was used and the pitching rate was 0.5 l (60 % consistency and 90% viability) slurry yeast of brewing wort. During fermentation samples were taken from sample valve for determination of degree Plato and ph. Samples for diacetyl analysis were taken 24 h after pitching and at regular intervals until day 7. For determination of diacetyl concentration a gas chromatography method based on EBC method 9.24.2(3) was used. Standard beer parameters were measured according to the procedure establish by European Brewery Convention. Four pilots brewing were carrying out by the next scheme: 1. Control brew: wort cooling temperature at 6 o C and main fermentation temperature at 8 o C. 2. Trial 1: wort cooling temperature at 8 o C and main fermentation temperature at 10 o C. 3. Trial 2: wort cooling temperature at 10 o C and main fermentation temperature at 12 o C. 4. Trial 3: wort cooling temperature at 12 o C and main fermentation temperature at 14 o C. The trials have been managed to optimize the main fermentation of wort and to determinate the optimum point to harvest the yeast, only when the diacetyl concentration in green beer is under diacetyl flavor threshold. We use one procedure called Narziss fermentation. In the original procedure the first days of fermentation is done at 8-10 o C. In the final days of main fermentation the temperature is allowed to increase to 20 o C, after which the beer is transferred to cold storage.

RESULTS The fermentation profiles for all four trials are presented in figure 2. Trial 3 was carried out for fermentation at 14 o C as warm rest, not as drastically as Narziss recommended to avoid the yeast stress. All the fermentation parameters have been recorded and a taste evaluation for organoleptic detection of diacetyl has been done. Figure1. Mashing regime 90 80 70 Temperature, oc 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Time, min Temperature, oc Figure 2. Fermentation temperature profile 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Control Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3

The evolution of diacetyl concentration during primary fermentation is presented in figure 3.After that, the yeast was harvest and the maturation was performed at 1-2 o C in cilindroconical tank. Figure 3.Diacetyl during wort fermentation 0.8 0.7 0.6 Diacetyl, mg/l 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Control Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 The results demonstrate the significant effect of temperature on diacetyl level. In the control brew diacetyl was higher than all other brews and with a very slow reduction speed. The final value after 7 days of main fermentation it was above the level of the flavor threshold. The final concentration of diacetyl after maturation period (total process time 24 days) for control beer and tests are presented in table. 1. Figure 4. ph during wort fermentation Figure 5. RDF during wort fermentation ph 5,2 5,1 5,0 4,9 4,8 4,7 4,6 4,5 4,4 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Extract, op 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Control Trial 1 Control Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 2 Trial 3

Table 1. Beer trials analyses Parameters Control Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Diacetyl, ppb 56 43 34 24 Alcohol, w/w 4.82 3.87 4.25 4.44 Alcohol, v/v 6.12 4.91 5.39 5.66 Original extract, o P 12.85 10.49 11.21 12.6 Real extract, o P 3.56 2.93 2.94 4.11 Present extract, o P 1.38 1.15 0.99 2.09 RDF, % 72.28 72.00 73.77 67.58 Calories, kcal/kg 468 381 436 461 Colour, EBC 8.7 15.6 7.8 10.8 Bitter units, BU 16.0 22.1 22.7 27.6 ph 4.58 4.77 4.65 4.67 DISCUSIONS Temperature and pitching yeast Higher pitching rate and temperature decrease the diacetyl level in the beer. The acetolactic acid will be formed earlier and decomposed earlier and the diacetyl more quickly removed. Higher pitching rate also accelerate fermentation. Yeast strain The strain of the yeast has an important influence on the diketone level in the final beer. It is important to have yeast that will remove diacetyl at the end of fermentation and sufficient cells must stay suspended in the beer for a sufficient time. In this condition it is important not harvest the yeast ant not chill back the green beer until the diacetyl level is acceptable. Wort composition and gravity The nitrogen compounds of wort are important in diacetyl formation. Because of the known effects of valine on diacetyl production it has often suggested that the valine composition of the wort is of prime importance. The use of high proportion of adjuncts with low nitrogen content, or use of undermodified malt (small amount of amino acid) often gives beer with high diacetyl content. A close relationship between the degree of fermentation (RDF) and the diacetyl content may be observe from the figure 3 and 5. Aeration (oxygen concentration) Aeration of the pitching wort does not normally increase diacetyl level in beer. Aeration produces more active yeast and more acetolactic acid in early stage. The presence of oxygen during fermentation (accidental) can cause high diacetyl level in beer by accelerating the breakdown of acetolactate to diacetyl. CONCLUSIONS

1. Diacetyl production and reduction are strongly influenced by temperature and the rates for both increases as temperature increase. 2. Fermentation on 14 o C is important for diacetyl reduction but flavor profile was no very pleasant as the control: less fresh with a bready (oxidized) flavor 3. Beer with acceptable low diacetyl concentration are obtaining more quickly with a high pitching rate, low pitching temperature (10 o C) and the temperature is raised to 12 o C when most of the carbohydrate has been utilized. 4. The diacetyl level decreases slowly during maturation time so, it is important not harvest the yeast and not chill back the green beer until the diacetyl level is acceptable. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Kunze,W.-Technology brewing and Malting,VLB,Berlin,1999 2. Michael J.Lewis,Tom W.Young - Brewing, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers,New York,2002 3. Wolfgang Hannemann Reducing beer maturation time and retaing quality. In: MBAA TQ vol.39, no.3, 2002, pp 149-155 4. George J. Fix Diacetyl: Formation, Reduction and Control. Brewing Techniques, July/August 1993 5. European Brewery Convention. Analityca EBC.5th ed. 6. Bamforth, C.-Beer flavor: Vicinal diketones.brew.guardian 130(8): 24-26