:t to cross the entire state and knock at the doors of a new cotton area north of the Red River known at that time as Indian Territory,

Similar documents
2017 PECAN WEEVIL UPDATE

SELF-POLLINATED HASS SEEDLINGS

Volume XL Issue 1, March 31, General Situation

Progress Report Submitted Feb 10, 2013 Second Quarterly Report

AVOCADOS IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY

Information - Peanuts

Some Common Insect Enemies

The Louisiana Purchase

American Indians. The First Americans

New England Middle Atlantic Region

Determining the Optimum Time to Pick Gwen

Tomatoes. Adapted from: Hot as a Pepper, Cool as a Cucumber, Meredith Sayles Hughes, 1999.

OPPORTUNITIES FOR SRI LANKAN VIRGIN COCONUT OIL IN TURKEY

District Court, E. D. New York. May 6, 1889.

Peanut Meal as a Protein. Fattening Hogs in the Dry Lot. Supplement to Corn for AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION ALABAMA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE

MARKET NEWSLETTER No 127 May 2018

District Court, S. D. New York. June, 1876.

Bromeliad-eating Weevils as Pests of Bromeliads

Areas of Heavy Rainfall around 7000 B.C. present

Spotted wing drosophila in southeastern berry crops

Michigan. Copyright 2011 WorksheetWeb

Quality of the United States Soybean Crop: Dr. Seth. L. Naeve and Dr. James H. Orf 2

western Canadian flaxseed 2003

Oriental Fruit Moth Invades Illinois

Acreage Forecast

Dusting Cotton With Calcium Arsenate for Boll Weevil Control

The Louisiana Purchase. Chapter 9, Section 2

Thomas Jefferson and the West.

The Aztec Empire: The Last Great Native Civilization in Mesoamerica

THE ANTISCORBUTIC VALUE OF FRESH AND CANNED ENGLISH TOMATOES. XC. (Received May 1st, 1924.)

EFFECTS OF HIGH TEMPERATURE AND CONTROLLED FRUITING ON COTTON YIELD

Woodlands Cultural Area Discover - Experience Connect Page 1 of 17

The Native American Experience

Exploring for Persea in Orizaba, Mexico

QUARTERLY REVIEW OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE DAIRY INDUSTRY 1

ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF LOUISIANA SUGARCANE PRODUCTION IN 2017

GRAIN SORGHUM. Tifton, Georgia: Early-Planted Grain Sorghum Hybrid Performance, 2012 Nonirrigated. 2-Year Average Yield

TESTING TO SEE IF THE CONDITION BREAD IS PLACED IN AFFECTS ITS MOLDING RATE Kate Hampton Cary Academy

Corn Earworm Management in Sweet Corn. Rick Foster Department of Entomology Purdue University

Republic of the Philippines CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Talobatib, Labo, Camarines Norte

Water Street Solutions Aerial Crop Tour /30/15

Do the Kanza and Excel pecan cultivars have a place in Georgia orchards?

Vegan Vocabulary Lesson

People of the Old Stone Age

COMANCHE COUNTY PECAN NEWS

Mapping the West: The Journey of Lewis and Clark By Michael Stahl

Holly Insects. (2a*ttnoC 9$ K. G. Swenson W. C. Adlerz. Agricultural Experiment Station Oregon State College Corvallis

Cabeza de Vaca Mini Q

MARKET NEWSLETTER No 111 December 2016

Washed agar gave such satisfactory results in the milk-powder. briefly the results of this work and to show the effect of washing

a rare and precious vintage in Bourgogne

NAME: DATE: PER: Paleolithic People: The Paleolithic Age. Making A Connection

Results from the 2012 Berry Pricing Survey. Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14853

SUMMER AVOCADO VARIETIES

> 1 THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY II6b. co p A6RICULIURAL U1BA8Y

Can You Tell the Difference? A Study on the Preference of Bottled Water. [Anonymous Name 1], [Anonymous Name 2]

A Note on Avocado Culture in New Zealand

Christopher Columbus Didn't Discover the New World; he Rediscovered it

Cocoa Prepared by Foresight December 5, 2017

7th Grade US History Standard #7H117 Do Now Day #17

A WORLD FIRST FOR HIBISCUS (WE THINK)

Carrot Trial 2014 Elkus Test Garden

SUGAR AND ACID METABOLISM IN CITRUS FRUIT. Karen E. Koch 1

Food Allergies on the Rise in American Children

Quality of Canadian oilseed-type soybeans 2016

AZTEC CIVILIZATION, PICTOGRAPHS, AND LACK OF AN ACCEPTED WRITING SYSTEM. Renee Coppola

Back to the English. HISTORY'S INFLUENTIAL PLANTS

early human history and Central & South America Jeopardy

O4W1703APP780 WSET Diploma Online

SELECTION STUDIES ON FIG IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION OF TURKEY

RESULTS OF THE MARKETING SURVEY ON DRINKING BEER

7. LOCALIZATION OF FRUIT ON THE TREE, BRANCH GIRDLING AND FRUIT THINNING

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

Variations in the Test of Separator Cream.

Retailing Frozen Foods

Cabeza de Vaca Meets the Coahuiltecans Reading #1 Eating New and Unusual Foods (From La Relación, Chapter 18)

Title: Control of Wild Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in 'Jubilee' Sweet Corn in the Willamette Valley, 1987.

To be officially certified organic, it is necessary to meet the requirements listed below.

Exploration ( )

PROCEDURE million pounds of pecans annually with an average

Student Handout #4: Era 3 Societies around the World. The Olmec:

Guided Reading. netw rks. The Maya. The Americas. Lesson 2 Life in the Americas ESSENTIAL QUESTION. Identifying Answer these questions about the Maya.

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education

Section 1. Objectives

PRUNUS AMERICANA (ROSACEAE) IN THE ARKANSAS FLORA

The Woolly Mammoth. Edward I. Maxwell

Bt Corn IRM Compliance in Canada

SUDAN EXPERIENCE IN Reducing Post harvest losses SALAH BAKHIET& WIDAD ABDELRAHMAN

96 of 100 DOCUMENTS FEDERAL REGISTER. 27 CFR Part 9. Napa Valley Viticultural Area. [TD ATF-79; Re: Notice No. 337] 46 FR 9061.

The World before the Opening of the Atlantic BEGINNINGS 1500

Notes on the Philadelphia Fed s Real-Time Data Set for Macroeconomists (RTDSM) Indexes of Aggregate Weekly Hours. Last Updated: December 22, 2016

Nogales: Donation Acceptance Program

Appendix II - 7. Buffalo Hump and Sand Dunes WSAs. Information and Recommendations

Christopher Columbus Didn't Discover the New World; he Rediscovered it

COLORADO REVISED STATUTES, TITLE 35, AGRICULTURE

Cambridge International Examinations Cambridge International General Certificate of Secondary Education

THE COLUMBIAN EXCHANGE

The multicolored Asian lady beetle, Harmonia axyridis: A nuisance pest in Ohio

ALBINISM AND ABNORMAL DEVELOPMENT OF AVOCADO SEEDLINGS 1

followed animals from Asia.

Transcription:

II. HISTORY OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE MEXI CAN COTTON BOLL WEEVIL IN OKLAHOMA G. A. Bieberdorf Oklahoma A. and M. College The Mexican cotton boll weevil like several of the insects causing serious damage to our field crops comes to us from foreign lands. The Boll weevil's direct history outside. as well as within the state of Oklahoma. is much like the weevil'l> method of work, somewhat obscure. It is thought that Central America is the native home of the Boll weevil, it having been dscribed in 1843 from specimens received from Vera Cruz, Mexico. Available evidence indicates that the weevil did its first damage in Mexico. So serious, in fact, was the damage in the year 1848 that it practically caused cotton cultivation to be abandoned ie the state of Coahuila, Mexico. About 1890 or approximately "forty five years after its description, the weevil crossed the Rio Grande near Brownsville into Texas. It was, however, not until 1894 that it came to the attention of the Bureau of Entomology. From the time that the weevil appeared in Texas it required just fourten years for :t to cross the entire state and knock at the doors of a new cotton area north of the Red River known at that time as Indian Territory, later becoming Oklahoma. Since I have indicated the rapidity with which the weevil has spread over the cotton growing area throughout Texas, it might be well to say a word in regard to its method of dissemination. Though it is not definitely known how the weevil crossed the Rio Grande it is thought that it was brought across in loads of cotton hauled from the Mexican side to the Brownsville gins. Ordinarily the weevil flies only a short distance at a time covering the longer distances with the aid of the wind and by making successive short flights. Under natural conditions the weevil extends its range from the middle of August till sometjme in September, seeming at this time to be seized with the instinct to' migrate. At other times excepting when the weevil is going to and from Ihi~ernating quarters, it is little inclined to fly. The dispersal then, is brought about largely by artificial means. At the time the weevil made his appearance on the northern boundary line of Texas, the Oklahoma Experiment Station was a" yet in its infancy and very few people, in what was then the

PLATE I Annual Northern Boundary Lines of Weevil Infestation in Oklahoma for the Years Shown.

THE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE cotton section of Oklahoma, knew of its existence. Consequently the early Boll weevil history in Oklahoma must be obtained from the U. S. Bureau of Entomology which 'had men located at Victoria and College Station, Texas, under whose jurisdiction Oklahoma was placed. The actual date on which the weevil crossed the border into the Indian Territory is not known, the records being destroyed by a fire at College Station, Texas, where they were being kept by the men working with the U. S. Bureau of Entomology, which at that time existed only as the Division of Entomology. The Red River did not detain the weevil on its progress north into the new territory of what was then Oklahoma's cotton section. The weevil reached the southern boundary line of Oklahoma in 1904 according to the literature of the U. S. Bureau of Entomology. The fourteenth annual report of the Okla homa Experiment Station says there as at that time considerable interest shown toward cotton insects, though no weevils had been sent in to the station for identification. In the sixteenth annual report of 1906-07, there is only this mention made of the cotton Boll weevil, "The cotton Boll worm and Mexican cotton Boll weevil are threatening our cotton industry with disaster." No mention was made of its entrance into the cotton area of Oklahoma. It was not until 1907 that we find any record in these reports of the weevil being found in Oklahoma. From the seventeenth report we read as follows: "The year (1907) was also notable for the appearance of the Mexican cotton Boll weevil in large enough numbers and over wide enough area to become a factor to be dealt with in cotton raising." There is, however, nothing mentioned in this or any other publication of the Oklahoma Experiment Station or the Bureau of Entomology as to the actual date of the first appearance of the weevil in Oklahoma. Dr. W. D. Hunter wrote a paper dated January, '1907, that was read before the Oklahoma Board of Agriculture meeting, entitled the "Boll Weevil in Oklahoma." In this paper Dr. Hunter says, "Although a few fields in the Red River valley opposite Fannin and Lamar counties, Texas, were infested in the fall o~ 1905, it was not until the summer of 1906 that an extensive invasion of Oklahoma began. That season was in general an unusual one as far as the migration of the pest was concerned. Greater advance was made to the northeast and west than any one previous year in which observations have been made. This migration in Oklahoma began early in August and continued intermittently until about the middle of November when un-

32 THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA usual cold checked its advance and killed the cotton plants." Still Dr.Hunter makes no statement as to the date of the first appearance of the weevil in Oklahoma. Professor C. E. Sanborn, now Entomologist at the Okla 'homa Experiment Station, who was then with the Bureau of Entomology located at College Station, Texas, working under the direction of Dr. W. D. Hunter, gave this bit of information on the first apearance of the Boll weevil in Oklahoma. During the month of June or July in the year 1905, a gentle IlJan whose name he did not remember sent a specimen of Boll weevil from Caddo, a town north of Durant, Oklahoma, to the experiment station at Col1ege Station, for identification. This specimen was referred to him for identification and further consideration. To his surprise he found' it to be the genuine Mexican cotton Boll weevil. Up until this time the Boll weevil was not known to occur in Oklahoma. In so far as I am able to find out, this is the earliest authentic record of the weevil's appearance in Oklahoma. After crossing the Oklahoma-Texas boundary line, the weevil disseminated rapidly over what was then the cotton growing section of the state. By the end of the year 1906, it spread from the small area that it infested in Bryan, Choctaw and Pushmataha counties to as far west as Jefferson county and as fa'r north as Latimer county. The next three years from 1906 to 1909, the weevil's progress was largely a northern movement, its additional western infestation being only some twenty miles, while northward it extended its territory to the northen boundary line of McIntosh county approximately seventy-five miles into new territory. T he next three years the weevil, for some cause or perhaps causes, receded until in 1913 the northern boundary line had dropped back to as far south as Choctaw and McCurtain counties. At this time the weevil infested only the southeast one third of Choctaw and southeast two thirds (If McCurtain counties. If there is any advantage in dropping back and making a new and better start, the weevil gained all possible advantages of such an opportunity at this time. By the fall of 1916 the weevil had not only regained all the lost tt"rritory but had greatly added to its previous acquisitions. It extended the infested territory to near the western boundary line of Tillman and Washita counties, while north in the central part of the state it extended its boundary line to Grant and Kay counties. In the eastern part of the state the -_. ested.rea dropped back to the northern line of Muskogee courtty and extended east to the Arkansas line. During the next three

THE ACADEMY OF SCIENCE years ('1916-19), the weevil again received a severe set back, and its northern boundary line receded to about the same position that it occupid in 1909. In the progress of the weevil across the cotton growing section of Oklahoma, it moved more rapidly in a northwestern direction than in any other. (See map indicating annual boundary lines of' weevil infestation.) As indicated on the map it reached the northern boundary line (,f the cotton belt in the north central part of the state in 1916. It was, however, not until 1922 that the infestation reached the northern limit of the cotton belt in the eastern part of the state. It might be said that by 1916 the weevil had spread over the entire cotton growing area of Oklahoma. It is true that the weevil extends over much more territory now than it did in 1916. At that time, however, there was very little cotton grown north of Garfield and Noble counties. The annual boundary line of weevil infestation since 1916 has been rather unstable, gradually moving in a northern direction. As the cotton growing area extended in that direction the weevil has c:osely followed it. At the present time, the weevil-infested area extends to the Kansas-Oklahoma line. In the latter part of October of this year, I found the boll weevil to be quite numerous tcn or fifteen miles north of Vinita, Okla. Had I gone farther north and examined cotton fields, the indications were that weevil would have been found as far north as the Kansas line and perhaps farther across the line. The southwestern section of this state seems to be the section in which the weevil has had the greatest difficulty in holding his o~n. In the year 1921, it reached the farthest point west that it has ever reached in Olahoma. Ever since that time the western boundary line of infestation has been moving eastward. As near as can be determined, the present (1926) infested area has receded to a point near the south central part of Cotton county. Beginning here the line continues to the northeast corner of Comanche county including all of Grady and the southeast fourth of Canadian, then diagonally through Logan ittcluding most of Payne, Pawnee, and half' of Osage counties taking most of Washington county and reaching its northernmost limit at the Washington, Nowata county and Kansas line. This, in brief, then has been the progress of the Boll weevil in Oklahoma. As has been true in the past, so doubtless in the future, the Boll weevil in Oklahoma will in all probability follow the cotton growing areas as it gradually expands. Since the weevil is especially adapted to a much warmer climate, it was

34 THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA at one time thought that it could not 'become numerous enough in the northern half of the cotton growing area in Oklahoma to do a great deal of damage. Now the question arises as the cotton area gradually extends farther north, How far will the weevil follow it? Especially is this true when one considers the fact that.some of o'ur coldest winters have been foljowed by yt"ars of greatest weevil infestation.