Compliance among North Indian Celiac Children to Gluten Free Diet

Similar documents
Problem. Background & Significance 6/29/ _3_88B 1 CHD KNOWLEDGE & RISK FACTORS AMONG FILIPINO-AMERICANS CONNECTED TO PRIMARY CARE SERVICES

GUIDANCE ON THE DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF LACTOSE INTOLERANCE AND PRESCRIPTION OF LOW LACTOSE INFANT FORMULA.

GUIDANCE ON THE DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF LACTOSE INTOLERANCE

Gluten-Free China Gastro Q&A

Citation for published version (APA): Goossens, N. (2014). Health-Related Quality of Life in Food Allergic Patients: Beyond Borders [S.l.]: s.n.

Gluten Free Prescribing. Engagement Survey Report Summer 2016

Primary Care Update January 26 & 27, 2017 Celiac Disease: Concepts & Conundrums

Living with Coeliac Disease Information & Support is key

Epidemiology. The old Celiac Disease Epidemiology:

HOW LONG UNTIL TRULY GLUTEN-FREE?

5. Supporting documents to be provided by the applicant IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER

Labor Supply of Married Couples in the Formal and Informal Sectors in Thailand

ASSESSING THE HEALTHFULNESS OF FOOD PURCHASES AMONG LOW-INCOME AREA SHOPPERS IN THE NORTHEAST

Sunderland Guidance on Prescribing Gluten Free Products

Food Allergy Community Needs Assessment INDIANAPOLIS, IN

RESEARCH UPDATE from Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute by Natalia Kolyesnikova, PhD Tim Dodd, PhD THANK YOU SPONSORS

PUBLIC HEALTH BRIEF 2011 UPDATE HEALTHIER CHOICES IN SCHOOL VENDING MACHINES: SURVEY RESULTS FROM MAHONING COUNTY SCHOOLS

Fruits and. Vegetables. Why Are Fruits and. Vegetables. Important? Inside this Section ...

Guideline for the Prescribing of Gluten Free Products (NUT5)

Process standardization of low-calories and low-sugar kalam

An update from the Competitiveness and Market Analysis Section, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry.

PARENTAL SCHOOL CHOICE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN NORTH CAROLINA

Food Allergies: Symptoms, Diagnosis, And Treatment (Natrition And Diet Research Progress) By Patricia M. Rodgers

Bt Corn IRM Compliance in Canada

Plate 2.1 City map of Puducherry showing selected areas for the study

Food Allergies on the Rise in American Children

ImuPro shows you the way to the right food for you. And your path for better health.

Comparative Analysis of Fresh and Dried Fish Consumption in Ondo State, Nigeria

FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SOFT DRINK CONSUMPTION IN PRESCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN IN SRI LANKA.

Diet Isn t Working, We Need to Do Something Else

DEVELOPMENT AND STANDARDISATION OF FORMULATED BAKED PRODUCTS USING MILLETS

See Policy CPT CODE section below for any prior authorization requirements

BIOPSY AVOIDANCE IN CHILDREN: THE EVIDENCE

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

Seriously, CELIAC. talk.

RESULTS OF THE MARKETING SURVEY ON DRINKING BEER

Am I a Silly Yak? Laura Zakowski, MD. No financial disclosures

Understanding Food Intolerance and Food Allergy

Coeliac disease catering gluten-free

ORGANOLEPTIC EVALUATION OF RECIPES BASED ON DIFFERENT VARIETIES OF MAIZE

Diagnosis Diagnostic principles Confirm diagnosis before treating

COMPARISON OF EMPLOYMENT PROBLEMS OF URBANIZATION IN DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS OF HYDERABAD KARNATAKA REGION A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY

Improving allergy outcomes. IgE and IgG 4 food serology in a Gastroenterology Practice. Jay Weiss, Ph.D and Gary Kitos, Ph.D., H.C.L.D.

Drink Journal PREPARATION 4-7. Sugary Drinks Extension Activity. Sugary Drinks USED BY:

EAT ACCORDING TO YOUR GENES. NGx-Gluten TM. Personalized Nutrition Report

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BEER TOURISM IN KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN

Clinical Immunology and Allergy Fellowship Program Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization

International Journal of Business and Commerce Vol. 3, No.8: Apr 2014[01-10] (ISSN: )

Urbanization is the inevitable and consequential result

Pediatric Food Allergies: Physician and Parent. Robert Anderson MD Rachel Anderson Syracuse, NY March 3, 2018

UNDERSTANDING COELIAC DISEASE

Characteristics of Wine Consumers in the Mid-Atlantic States: A Statistical Analysis

Health Canada s Position on Gluten-Free Claims

Anaphylaxis Policy RATIONALE

Is Fair Trade Fair? ARKANSAS C3 TEACHERS HUB. 9-12th Grade Economics Inquiry. Supporting Questions

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

1) What proportion of the districts has written policies regarding vending or a la carte foods?

II. The National School Lunch Program

Allergies and Intolerances Policy

A Comparison of X, Y, and Boomer Generation Wine Consumers in California

The University of North Texas Dining Services White Paper: A Vegetarian Diet

Healthy Food Procurement in the County of Los Angeles Public Health Alliance of Southern California Leadership Council May 31, 2013

Medical Conditions Policy

Suspension of Gluten Free NHS Prescribing for Adults

Have your say on the future of gluten-free foods on NHS prescription

2017 FINANCIAL REVIEW

Food Intolerance & Expertise SARAH KEOGH CONSULTANT DIETITIAN EATWELL FOOD & NUTRITION

Sequoia Education Systems, Inc. 1

F&N 453 Project Written Report. TITLE: Effect of wheat germ substituted for 10%, 20%, and 30% of all purpose flour by

Power and Priorities: Gender, Caste, and Household Bargaining in India

Gluten regulations frequently asked questions

Creating Health for Your Patients and Your Practice

Introduction. Background Information

'Every time I eat dairy foods I become ill, could I have a milk allergy.? '. Factors involved in the development of cow's milk allergy:

Using Growing Degree Hours Accumulated Thirty Days after Bloom to Help Growers Predict Difficult Fruit Sizing Years

A study on consumer perception about soft drink products

The Role of Calorie Content, Menu Items, and Health Beliefs on the School Lunch Perceived Health Rating

A Web Survey Analysis of the Subjective Well-being of Spanish Workers

STUDY REGARDING THE RATIONALE OF COFFEE CONSUMPTION ACCORDING TO GENDER AND AGE GROUPS

Egg-Free Medifast Products The following Medifast products do not contain egg as a known ingredient.

LEVEL: BEGINNING HIGH

Spectrum of Gluten Disorders

Grade: Kindergarten Nutrition Lesson 4: My Favorite Fruits

St.Werburgh s Park Nursery School. Food Policy

Guideline for Prescribing Specialist Infant Formula in Primary Care For Infants With Cow s Milk Protein Allergy (CMPA) or Lactose Intolerance


Prescribing Gluten-Free Foods in Primary Care: Guidance for CCGs

Report Brochure HISPANIC WINE DRINKERS IN THE US MARKET NOVEMBER REPORT PRICE: GBP 1000 EUR 1200 USD 1600 AUD 1700 or 2 Report Credits

Summary Report Survey on Community Perceptions of Wine Businesses

Studies regarding the obtaining and sensory analysis of gluten-free muffins with buckwheat flour addition

LIVING WITH FOOD ALLERGY

Can You Tell the Difference? A Study on the Preference of Bottled Water. [Anonymous Name 1], [Anonymous Name 2]

Jennings Street School

Challenges in Celiac Disease. Adam Stein, MD Director of Nutrition Support Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

The Five Most Unhealthful School Lunches A Report from the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine Spring 2010

Hamburger Pork Chop Deli Ham Chicken Wing $6.46 $4.95 $4.03 $3.50 $1.83 $1.93 $1.71 $2.78

Fairtrade Buying Behaviour: We Know What They Think, But Do We Know What They Do?

Follow-up Management of Patients with Celiac Disease: Resource for Health Professionals

Associate Professor Rohan Ameratunga

Fairfield Public Schools Family Consumer Sciences Curriculum Food Service 30

Transcription:

Kamla-Raj 2016 Stud Home Com Sci, 10(1-3): 69-73 (2016) Compliance among North Indian Celiac Children to Gluten Free Diet Sadia Chishty 1*, Monika 2 and Nimali Singh 3 Department of Home Science, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India E-mail: 1* <sadia_chishty@yahoo.co.in>, 3 <drnimalisingh@gmail.com> KEYWORDS Adherence. Children. Gluten Consumption. Gluten Containing Products. Pre-adolescents ABSTRACT Gluten free diet is the only treatment for healing and recovery of mucosa and normalization of symptoms in celiac disease. To study the compliance rate for gluten free diet and consumption of gluten containing items among confirmed Celiac disease patients. Celiac disease patient (7-12 years) previously diagnosed were selected. An interview schedule was developed and pre-tested on 10 percent of sample, then used for data collection by a skilled dietician. Compliance information was derived on the basis of: 1.) 45 gluten containing items 2.) Two day 24 hour dietary recall 3.) Children receiving pocket money. The compliance rate was poor in both the age groups. The mean compliance score was comparatively more in children (7-9 years) than pre-adolescents. Relationship between pocket money receivers and non-compliance was found highly significant (Chi-square value=100.64 at p < 0.01). Compliance rate between both the age groups (that is, 7-9 and 10-12 years) was very poor. Preadolescents are more prone to noncompliance. There is positive impact of knowledge and regular follow up on strict adherence to GFD. INTRODUCTION * Address for correspondence: Dr Sadia Chishty, Laxmi Bai Hostel, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India 302 004 Mobile: 9521456196 E-mail: sadia_chishty@yahoo.co.in Coeliac disease (CD) represents a unique disorder in which consumption of a food ingredient, namely gluten, in conjunction with genetic susceptibility, is essential for the development of an insidiously evolving auto-immune reaction affecting the gut and other organs (Nijhawan and Goyal 2015). Treatment of CD consists of a strict life-long gluten-free diet, which usually offers a protective effect against complications of malabsorption and extraintestinal involvement (Schuppan and Zimmer 2013). Non-compliance in relation to gluten free diet (GFD) is a major problem and the greatest challenge physicians face in treating the children with celiac disease. Non-compliance may occur due to factors like temptation and not liking the taste of gluten-free food and alternative food grains (Chauhan et al. 2010). In adolescents, peer pressure, unclear labeling on ready-to-eat food, and non- availability of gluten-free food at party, marriages, and so forth have contributed to non-compliance. An increasingly hectic lifestyle of teenagers has contributed to a greater reliance on packaged foods which often contain gluten, and thus making it inconvenient for them to adhere to restrictive diet (Errichiello et al. 2010). Therefore, the present study was undertaken to study the compliance of GFD in previously diagnosed celiac disease (CD) patients aged 7-12 years. METHODOLOGY On the basis of prevalence of disease (1 in 96 as per Makharia et al. 2011), statistically the total sample size calculated was 15 (using the formula for sample size calculation). A lple size was taken for making it statistically viable, the number of subjects enrolled in the study were 50. Formula used for calculation of sample size n= where, d = Precision P = Prevalence (1 in 96) (Makharia et al. 2011) Z = Crit at P=0.05 Sample Selection (Z * Z) * P(1-P) d 2 Celiac disease patient in the age group of 7-12 years following gluten free diet, registered in

70 SADIA CHISHTY, MONIKA AND NIMALI SINGH records of various hospitals, clinics and wheat free stores of Jaipur were selected. The list of children was procured from hospital and gluten free store; only children residing in Jaipur were approached. The care takers of children were approached personally. Inclusion Criteria Individuals were eligible for the study if they fulfilled the following criteria-children 7-12 years old with celiac disease; willing to participate in the study; absence of any other complication like TB, cancer or diabetes. Approval by the Ethics Committee For carrying out the present study, approval by Ethical Committee was obtained. Written Consent An informed written consent was obtained from the subject s caretakers. In order to do so, a consent form was developed and consent was taken prior to enrolling the patient in study. Development of Tool An interview schedule was developed and pretested on 10 percent of sample approximately ten children and was used by a skilled dietician. Information was elicited on various aspects which are enlisted: 1.) Children receiving Pocket money, 2.) Compliance for gluten free diet was evaluated through checklist and 3.) Two day 24 hour recall method. A check list of 45 gluten containing items was developed. This included products which were not mentioned gluten free by the manufacturer. Information gathered on consumption of gluten containing 45 food items that could be eaten either intentionally or unintentionally from both the age groups. Consumption was assessed in last two weeks period by a skilled dietician. Consuming =zero; not consuming=one mark, on this scoring the subjects were decided to be compliant or non-compliant. (Maximum score =45, minimum score=zero Cut-offs used to categorize children in compliant and non compliant was >34 (out of 45 items list) and < 34 respectively. The checklist reported on basis of more the scores attained more the compliance rate criterion. 24 hour dietary recall part was also scrutinized for gluten containing items. (< 25% score = poorly compliant, below 75% =average compliance and above 75%=good compliance). Data Analysis The data analysis was done using SPSS version 19.00. The statistical tests carried out were percentage and arithmetic mean. Chi-square test was done to test the relationship between the variables, p values < 0.05 were accepted as significant and <0.01 as highly significant. Estimated sample size calculation was done prior to implementation of study. RESULTS Forty-four percent Celiac children were living in joint families while and 56 percent had nuclear families. Educational status of parents was poor. The literacy rate was low with (16 %) fathers (16%) and mothers (28%) being illiterate. Mothers of Celiac children who reached primary and upper primary level were 45 percent and 10 percent respectively. Mothers of Celiac children who acquired secondary and senior secondary were 16 percent, graduate were 10 percent and post-graduation level were 8 percent. Fathers of Celiac (20%) children were involved in small businesses. Other occupations included skilled labor, small businesses or private jobs. The majority of mothers of Celiac children were home makers. 62 percent had per-capita income ranging between Rs.1000-3000. The least per capita income was 1000 and highest was above 7000 rupees. Celiac disease was confirmed using both serology and biopsy in 80 percent children while 20 percent were confirmed on serological tests only. Predominantly 58 percent of parents were not going for follow up visits and 42 percent were visiting doctors for follow up. Both the genders and age category (that is, 7-9 and 10-12 years of age) included in the study were in similar proportion. (that is, n=24 and n=26). Seventy-two percent celiac children were getting pocket money no matter what the economic group they belonged to. The mean duration of the disease was 3 years. Siblings either keep a check or invite the Celiac subject to munch on gluten rich products. Mainly 90 percent Celiac children had 1 to 3 siblings and 8

GFD-GLUTEN FREE DIET, CD-CELIAC DISEASE 71 percent children in both the groups had 4-6 siblings. It was observed that compliance rate was poor in both the age groups. The mean (SD) compliance score was comparatively more in children aged 7-9 years 24.19 (13.22/45) than preadolescents 22.96 (12.49/45). Children were classified into three categories, that is, poor, average and good. Poorly compliant children were 18 percent who scored <11 while 48 percent had average compliance and scored between12-33. Good compliance was noticed in 34 percent only (>34). Consumption of Gluten Containing Foods by Celiac Children The compliance of children was investigated by their intake of gluten rich foods in last two weeks period. The average consumption of gluten containing food product was comparatively more among pocket money receivers whether it be wheat containing foods, milk products, gluten containing sweets or miscellaneous products (Table 1). Similarly the celiac pre-adolescents were found to be consuming more gluten Table 1: Average number of Celiac children consuming gluten containing product on the basis of pocket money Food items Pocket No pocket money money receivers (n=14) (n=36) Consuming Consu- GF products ming GF products Wheat and its product 13.75 (165) 1.10 (13) Milk and its product 22.33 (134) 2.67 (16) Gluten containing sweets 18.17 (140) 1.87 (15) Gluten containing 22.70 (419) 3.68 (70) miscellaneous products Notes: Parenthesis depicts numbers; GF- gluten free wheat and its products included sevaiyyan, cornflakes, wheat roti, samosa/kachori, toast suji/ wheat biscuit, aata noodles/ maggi, bread pav, oats, cake/pastry, upma/ dalia, golgappe, pasta; Milk and milk products included cheese, flavored milk, market paneer, market khoya, milkshake, milk cake; Gluten containing sweets included besan ladoo, market jalebi, gulabjuman, besan burfi, fruit custard, mavakulfi, faluda-ice-cream, fruit cream; Gluten containing miscellaneous products included aaloo tikki, Chinese food, squash, chocolate, éclair, pickles (market), packed soup, ketchup, soya sauce, asfoetida, jaggery, dalbadi/ mungodi, chaavanpraash, readymade curry masala, readymade puree, canned fruits, baking powder, brewer s yeast, horlicks/boost. containing foods and were less compliant. The gluten containing foods that were frequently eaten among both the age groups: samosa, kachori, cake, pastry, wheat biscuits, paneer (market), milk cake, besan laddoo, aaloo tikki, chocolate, milk shake, jalebi, market kulfi, éclair toffee, baking powder, asafoetida, market soup, Chinese foods, ketchup, jaggery, pickles etc. (Table 2). Table 2: Average consumption of gluten containing food products by celiac children of both age groups Food items Celiac 7-9 years children 10-12 (n=50) years (n=26) (n=24) Compliance has a major role in the treatment of Celiac disease and factors associated were studied. Pocket money and compliance was found to be significantly associated (Chisquare value=100.64 at p < 0.01). It was observed that compliance was more in children who were not receiving pocket money. Buying capacity was increased due to pocket money in Celiac children and thus the child spent it in buying gluten rich food items like cake, pastry, biscuits, chocolates, sweets, flavored milk etc. DISCUSSION Yes Yes Wheat and its product 30.13 (94) 33.33 (96) Milk and its product 48.08 (75) 52.08 (75) Gluten containing sweets 32.32 (122) 40.62 (78) Gluten containing 48.57 (240) 55.47 (253) miscellaneous products Notes: Parenthesis depicts numbers; Wheat and its products included sevaiyyan, cornflakes, wheat biscuit, aata noodles/ maggi, bread pav, oats, cake/pastry, upma/ dalia, golgappe, pasta; Milk and milk products included cheese, flavored milk, market paneer, market khoya, milkshake, milk cake; Gluten containing sweets included besan ladoo, market jalebi, gulabjuman, besan burfi, fruit custard, mavakulfi, faluda-ice-cream, fruit cream; Gluten containing miscellaneous products included aaloo tikki, Chinese food, squash, chocolate, éclair, pickles (market), packed soup, ketchup, soya sauce, asfoetida, jaggery, dalbadi/ mungodi, chaavanpraash, readymade curry masala, readymade puree, canned fruits, baking powder, brewer s yeast, horlicks/boost. This study was planned on previously diagnosed cases of Celiac disease. One-fourth children

72 SADIA CHISHTY, MONIKA AND NIMALI SINGH were fully compliant and rest three-fourth were partially compliant. Since the compliance was assessed on an account of gluten containing 45 food items list and two-day 24 hour recall, very less number of children were found to be fully compliant. Present study reported very less compliance rate which is in contrast with previously reported studies. Strict adherence to GFD was reported 60.2 percent (Sarkhy et al. 2015), good compliance 53.8 percent (Taghdir et al. 2016), strict compliance to a strict GFD 44.4 percent (Charalampopoulos et al. 2013). Higher degree of compliance is reported when parents have better knowledge about Celiac disease and the gluten containing items, understand importance of GFD for their child s overall growth and development, and are able to distinguish gluten containing from gluten-free food so that they handle the menu better (Garg and Gupta 2014). Parental perceived knowledge was significantly associated with dietary compliance (Charalampopoulos et al. 2013). Similarly, in a previous study, total knowledge scores of parents were found to be associated with compliance for GFD of their celiac children (Chishty et al. 2016). Mother s education was found as a significant factor related with the compliance (Garg and Gupta 2014). In this study the compliance rate was comparatively better in children aged 7-9 years than pre- adolescents (10-12 years) which is similar to a previous study by Garg and Gupta (2014). They reported higher compliance rate in children up to 9 years of age as compared to children aged above 9 years. Adolescence is the time, when non-compliance is more likely because of ignorance, peer pressure and temptation (Puri et al. 2009). Changes in dietary habits are difficult to maintain and studies have shown that compliance decrease as they grow up, so there is a need for continuous reinforcement about sustaining GFD (Roma et al. 2010). Compliance reduces if the patient is not regular for follow-up visits. In a similar study of compliance carried out by van Koppen et al. (2009) in Netherlands on 12-14 years old based on interview reported that after 10 years follow up the compliance rate was low. The term lifelong dietary modification seems normal and easy to implement but it is difficult for a child to exclude the basic food items from his diet which other family members or his /her friends are consuming and he has grown eating those food item daily twice or thrice. After the of three years the GFD was not followed well. It was observed that parents of some of celiac children lost hope in gluten free treatment and were inclined to homeopathic treatment which allows wheat in diet. The sample included in study comprised of low or middle income group. North Indian diets comprise of delicacies like wheat flour Batis, puris, bhature, aaloo tikki, gol gappe etc which children cannot resists to control hence affect the likelihood of compliance. The primary reasons for noncompliance could be attributed to less knowledge (Charalampopoulos et al. 2013; Garg and Gupta 2014) about hidden sources of gluten containing foods like jaggery, asafoetida, icecreams, baking powder, yeast, soups, sauces etc, less availability of GF foods, less acceptability of gluten free foods, inadequate support from family and peers, peer pressure, unclear labelling (Errichiello et al. 2010), lack of knowledge of the health-related harms of gluten ingestion (Olsson et al. 2008), irregularity in follow up (van Koppen et al. 2009), poverty, illiteracy, ignorance (Garg and Gupta 2014), limited resources, lack of awareness, limited time, monotonous menu, fewer inexpensive gluten free options, temptation (Chauhan et al. 2010) and poor counseling session for CD patients. An additional barrier to adherence is the economic feasibility of living with the GFD (Stevens and Rashid 2008). Lack of labeling about gluten status in marketed products like chocolate, biscuit, ice-creams, etc. was another problem as there is no legislation for gluten labeling in India (Verma 2013). Pocket money is a contributing factor for non-compliance too. Sometimes families being religious finds it hard to stop child from eating prashad which mostly include wheat based sweets. To improve compliance other than annual follow ups by physician and skilled dietician; improved knowledge and participation in a local support groups are almost nonexistent in India (Verma 2013). CONCLUSION Pre-adolescents are more prone to non-compliance. There is a positive relation between knowledge and regular follow up on strict adherence to GFD. More emphasis should laid on

GFD-GLUTEN FREE DIET, CD-CELIAC DISEASE 73 dietary adherence and diet quality, so to combat the nutritional deficiencies. This should be both through group and individual approach. RECOMMENDATIONS There is a strong need to monitor and revise the gluten free diet. Therefore emphasis should be laid on regular monitoring, awareness, follow up on gluten free diet and compliance among celiac patients and their families. Labeling laws and gluten free guidelines for Indians should be formulated to simplify the complications of disease. What is Already Known? After many years of follow up the compliance rate was low in celiac patients. What this Study Adds? Consumption pattern of gluten containing items among celiac children, rate of compliance among children and pre-adolescents. Pocket money, is significantly associated with non compliance in celiac children. REFERENCES Charalampopoulos D, Panayiotou J, Chouliaras G, Zellos A, Kyritsi E, Roma E 2013. Determinants of adherence to gluten-free diet in Greek children with coeliac disease: A cross-sectional study. Eur J Clin Nutr, 67(6): 615-619. Chauhan JC, Kumar P, Dutta AK, Basu S, Kumar A 2010. Assessment of dietary compliance to gluten free diet and psychosocial problems in Indian children with celiac disease. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 77(6): 649-654. Chishty S, Monika, Singh N 2016. Knowledge and practices among parents of children suffering from Celiac disease. International Journal of Food, Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, 6(2): 31-38. Errichiello S, Esposito O, Di Mase R, Camarca ME, Natale C, Limongelli MG et al. 2010. Celiac disease: Predictors of compliance with a gluten-free diet in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 50(1): 54-60. Garg A, Gupta R 2014. Predictors of compliance to gluten-free diet in children with Celiac disease. Hindawi International Scholarly Research Notices, 248402: 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/ 248402. Makharia GK, Verma AK, Amarchand R, Bhatnagar S, Das P, Goswami A et al. 2011. Prevalence of celiac disease in the northern part of India: A community based study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 26(5): 894-90 0. Nijhawan S, Goyal G 2013. Celiac disease review. Journal of Gastrointestinal & Digestive System, 5(6): 1-7. Olsson C, Hornell A, Ivarsson A, Sydner Y M 2008. The everyday life of adolescent Celiacs: Issues of importance for compliance with the gluten-free diet. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 21: 359-367. Puri AS, Jain P, Tyagi P, Sachdev S 2009. Factors Determining Dietary Compliance to Gluten Free Diet in Indian Patients with Celiac Disease. 13 th International Celiac Disease Symposium, 2009, Amsterdam. Abstract 365. Roma E, Roubani A, Kolia E, Panayioutou J, Zellos A, Syriopolou VP 2010. Dietary compliance and lifestyle of children with celiac disease. J Human Nutr Diet, 176-182. Saadah OI, Zacharin M, O Callaghan A, Oliver MR, Catto-Smith AG 2004. Effect of gluten-free diet and adherence on growth and diabetic control in diabetics with celiac disease. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 89(9): 871-876. Sarkhy AA, Mouzan ME, Saeed E, Alanazi A, Alghamdi A, Shirin A, Assiri A 2015. Clinical characteristics of Celiac disease and dietary adherence to glutenfree diet among Saudi children. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr, 18(1): 23 29. Schuppan D, Zimmer KP 2013. The diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 110(49): 835-846. Stevens L, Rashid M 2008. Gluten-free and regular foods: A cost comparison. Canadian J Dietetic Practice and Research, 69(3): 147-150. Taghdir M, Honar N, Mohammad S, Mazloomi, Sepandi M, Ashourpour M, Salehi M 2016. Dietary compliance in Iranian children and adolescents with celiac disease. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 9: 365-370. van Koppen EJ, Schweizer JJ, Csizmadia CG, Krom Y, Hylkema HB, van Geel AM et al. 2009. Longterm health and quality-of-life consequences of mass screening for childhood celiac disease: A 10-year follow-up study. Pediatrics, 123: e582-e588. Verma S 2013. Gluten free diet, perceptions and concerns of people living with celiac disease in India: Internet -based survey of members of Zero gluten on Facebook. Journal of Post Graduate Medicine, Education and Research, 47(2): 107-111. Paper received for publication on November 2016 Paper accepted for publication on December 2016