Almond trunk injury treatment following bark damage during shaker harvest

Similar documents
Determination of the best time of harvest in different commercial Iranian pistachio nuts

Current status of loquat in Chile

2005 Research: Monitoring, Sanitation, and Insect Pest Management in Figs

Marvin Butler, Rhonda Simmons, and Ralph Berry. Abstract. Introduction

MANAGING INSECT PESTS IN BERRIES AND FRUITS. Small Farm School 8 September 2012 Bruce Nelson, CCC Horticulture Department

THOUSAND CANKERS DISEASE AND WALNUT TWIG BEETLE IN A THREE YEAR OLD ORCHARD, SOLANO COUNTY

MONITORING WALNUT TWIG BEETLE ACTIVITY IN THE SOUTHERN SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY: OCTOBER 2011-OCTOBER 2012

Canker Diseases of Almond. December 10, 2015

Corn Earworm Management in Sweet Corn. Rick Foster Department of Entomology Purdue University

Emergence dates of Eurytoma amygdali Enderlein adults in the south-east of France and control strategy

Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015

THE THREAT: The disease leads to dieback in shoots and fruiting buds and an overall decline in walnut tree health.

Managing Navel Orangeworm (NOW) in Walnuts. Kathy Kelley Anderson Farm Advisor Stanislaus County

2003 Tree Borer Survey

Variety Payne Ashley Ashley Payne Ashley. SpaCing 25x25 t 25 x 25 ft 35 x 35 t 30 x 30 t 40 tx 40 t with 1 in middle

Borers. What kinds of insects are borers? How do borers find stressed trees?

Mealybug Species. Vine Mealybug. Grape and Obscure Mealybugs. Longtailed Mealybug. Pink Hibiscus Mealybug. Gills Mealybug

Walnut Husk Fly: Biology, Monitoring and Management. R. A. Van Steenwyk Dept. of E.S.P.M University of California, Berkeley

Metallic Wood Borer in the News. Emerald Ash Borer

Chickpea production in Turkey

Managing Insect Pests of Ripening Grapes

Development of Host-Plant Resistance as a Strategy to Reduce Damage from the Major Sunflower Insect Pests

Oriental Fruit Moth Invades Illinois

New Research on Navel Orangeworm Management

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Vineyard Insect Management what does a new vineyard owner/manager need to know?

Mating Disruption an AreawideApproach to Controlling the Borer Complex in cherry

HARVEST MATURITY OF ALMOND CULTIVARS IN CALIFORNIA S SACRAMENTO VALLEY

Arthropod Management in California Blueberries. David Haviland and Stephanie Rill UC Cooperative Extension, Kern Co. Blueberry Field Day 20 May 2009

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

Nine Hungarian almond cultivars in the Republic of Macedonia

Faba bean production in Turkey

2009 SUNFLOWER INSECT PEST PROBLEMS AND INSECTICIDE UPDATE

USDA. Project: Brown Marmorated Stink Bug: Damage Survey and' Monitoring Efforts

Metallic Wood Borer in the News. Emerald Ash Borer

Flower buds drop in the almond

National programme for the production of certified citrus plants in Tunisia

Report of Progress 961

Emerald Ash Borer in Colorado

Cubero J.I. (ed.), Saxena M.C. (ed.). Present status and future prospects of faba bean production and improvement in the Mediterranean countries

Citrus Crop Guide. New registration for citrus gall wasp

Current research status and strategic challenges on the black coffee twig borer, Xylosandrus compactus in Uganda

DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF CANKER DISEASES IN ALMONDS

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 18 June 2012 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Information sources: 1, 5

EFFECT OF CULTURAL MANIPULATION OF "MUMMY" WALNUTS ON WINTER SURVIVAL OF NAVEL ORANGEWORM

Almond & Walnut Harvest Evaluation: Identifying Sources of Damage

Monitoring and Controlling Grape Berry Moth in Texas Vineyards

APPENDIX Thirty Trees Sampling Method for CBB Monitoring

Almond selection in microclimate areas of northeast Anatolia

Ecological distribution study of wild pistachios for selection of roostock

Coffee Berry Borer (CBB) Preliminary Results

Some Common Insect Enemies

Spotted wing drosophila in southeastern berry crops

Chemical Control of Avocado Root Rot and Stem Canker

Fruit-infesting Flies

Prepared by Louise Ferguson, Mark Bell, Mark Henderson

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

The Pomology Post. Hull Rot Management on Almonds. by Brent Holtz, Ph.D., University of California Pomology Advisor

Your Orchard. Month by Month. Just Fruits & Exotics. Just the FACTS. 30 St. Frances St. Crawfordville FL32327

The effect of protected tomato seedlings on the growth and yield of late summer tomato in Egypt

Response of selected almond varieties and sélections to Pseudomonas amygdali, the causal agent of the "hyperplastic bacterial canker" of almond

University of California Cooperative Extension Tulare County. Grape Notes. Volume 3, Issue 4 May 2006

Walnut Blight Control Investigations 2004 (Xanthomonas campestris pv juglandis)

Apricot. Pruning. Fruit Fly

Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2008 Research Report

Managing Spotted Wing Drosophila, Drosophila Suzukii Matsumara, In Raspberry.

Sunflower Moth Control Using Chlorantraniliprole (Dupont or Besiege) vs. Common Insecticides Final Report

Fungicide control of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot on grape: 2014 field trial

MSU Extension Publication Archive. Scroll down to view the publication.

Spotted Wing Drosophila (SWD) Baiting and Trapping. Hannah Lee Dr. Gerard Krewer Dr. Elke Weibelzahl

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 12 July 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

To study the effects of four different levels of fertilizer NPK nutrients, applied at a ratio of N:P 2

POP Cherry Scouting Guide

THOUSAND CANKERS DISEASE of WALNUT: STATUS in CALIFORNIA

Report of Progress 961

BIO-EFFICACY OF NEWER INSECTICIDES AGAINST POD BORER COMPLEX OF PIGEONPEA [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh] *PATEL, S. A. AND PATEL, R. K.

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

Fátima Gonçalves, Cristina Carlos, Susana Sousa, Márcio Nóbrega, José C. Franco, José Manso, António Pinto, Laura Torres

Cankers Disease of Walnut. Whitney Cranshaw

Republic of the Philippines CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE College of Agriculture and Natural Resources Talobatib, Labo, Camarines Norte

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

DIY Spotted Wing Drosophila Monitoring/Management

Bacterial canker of sweet cherry in Oregon Disease symptoms, cycle, and management

EFFECTS OF KAOLIN CLAY PARTICLE FILM ON LEAF TEMPERATURE, NUT TEMPERATURE AND SUNBURN SUSCEPTIBILITY IN WALNUT

Progress Report Submitted Feb 10, 2013 Second Quarterly Report

Fungicide Control of Phomopsis Cane and Leaf Spot on Grapevine: 2015 Field Trial

Thousand Cankers Disease vs. Shallow Bark Canker Seasonal Activity of Walnut Twig Beetle in the southern San Joaquin Valley

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

Plane Tree Anthracnose (Gnomonia Veneta)

Control of Powdery Mildew in Wine Grape. N.L. Rothwell and K.L. Powers, NWMHRS A. Schilder, Dept. of Plant Pathology, MSU

Experimentation to Monitor and Control Grape Root Borer. Martin Keen Landey Vineyards Lancaster, PA

Corn Earworm: Is It Resistant to Pyrethroids?

Insects in Vegetables: A Review of 2011 and What to Know for 2012

Vibration Damage to Kiwifruits during Road Transportation

Management and research of fruit rot diseases in vineyards

Fruit Flies (Apple maggot, Cherry Fruit Flies, etc.) Diptera: Tephritidae

Area-Wide Program to Eradicate the European Grapevine Moth, Lobesia botrana in California, USA.

Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 26 July 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI

Transcription:

Almond trunk injury following bark damage during shaker harvest Connell J.H., van Steenwyk R.A., Gubler W.D. in Oliveira M.M. (ed.), Cordeiro V. (ed.). XIII GREMPA Meeting on Almonds and Pistachios Zaragoza : CIHEAM Options Méditerranéennes : Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 63 2005 pages 199-202 Article available on line / Article disponible en ligne à l adresse : http://om.ciheam.org/article.php?idpdf=5600031 To cite this article / Pour citer cet article Connell J.H., van Steenwyk R.A., Gubler W.D. Almond trunk injury following bark damage during shaker harvest. In : Oliveira M.M. (ed.), Cordeiro V. (ed.). XIII GREMPA Meeting on Almonds and Pistachios. Zaragoza : CIHEAM, 2005. p. 199-202 (Options Méditerranéennes : Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 63) http://www.ciheam.org/ http://om.ciheam.org/

Almond trunk injury following bark damage during shaker harvest J.H. Connell*, R.A. Van Steenwyk** and W.D. Gubler*** *University of California Cooperative Extension, 2279-B Del Oro Avenue, Oroville, CA 95965-3315, USA **Insect Biology-CNR, University of California, 201 Wellman Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-3112, USA ***University of California, Plant Pathology, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616-8680, USA jhconnell@ucdavis.edu SUMMARY Injury to almond tree trunks during mechanical shaker harvest quickly attracts several insect vectors of the Ceratocystis fimbriata fungus. The American plum borer, Euzophera semifuneralis, a known Ceratocystis fungus vector, prefers to attack young, injured, or weakened trees wherever callous tissue has formed. When the insect bores through the trees wound-healing zone it could be an important means of introducing Ceratocystis spores long after a mechanical injury occurs. Trimming back crushed, torn, or loosened bark to well attached bark and treating the wound with an insecticide-paint or copper-oil reduces the number of plum borer strikes compared to untreated wounds. The number of Ceratocystis cankers that subsequently occur are also reduced by these s and the copper-oil may provide benefits for several years. Key words: American plum borer, Ceratocystis, Euzophera, Prunus dulcis, Prunus amygdalus. RESUME "Traitement des dommages causés à l'écorce des troncs d'amandiers pendant la récolte par secouage". Les dommages causés aux troncs d'amandier pendant la récolte mécanique par secouage attirent rapidement plusieurs insectes vecteurs du champignon Ceratocystis fimbriata. Le foreur américain du prunier, Euzophera semifuneralis, un vecteur connu de Ceratocystis, préfère attaquer les arbres jeunes, blessés, ou affaiblis partout où un tissu dur s'est formé. Quand l'insecte perce la zone de guérison de l'arbre, il pourrait présenter des moyens importants d'introduire des spores de Ceratocystis longtemps après que des dommages mécaniques se produisent. Tailler l'écorce écrasée, déchirée, ou détachée jusqu'au point où l'ecorce est bien attachée et traiter la blessure avec un insecticide-peinture ou une huile-cuivre réduit le nombre d'attaques de foreurs du prunier en comparison aux blessures non traitées. Le nombre de chancres de Ceratocystis qui se produisent plus tard sont également réduits par ces traitements et le traitement a l'huile-cuivre peut fournir des avantages pendant plusieurs années. Mots-clés : Foreur américain du prunier, Ceratocystis, Euzophera, Prunus dulcis, Prunus amygdalus. Introduction Injury to almond tree trunks during mechanical shaker harvest results in serious damage to tree vigour, health, and longevity. Injuries where bark is crushed or torn from the trunk immediately attract a variety of insects, several of which are known vectors of Ceratocystis fimbriata fungus spores. When insect feeding and establishment of Ceratocystis cankers compound these trunk injuries, premature tree losses may occur. The fungus grows well on exposed cambium where bark has been stripped off. It grows even more vigorously under bark that has been crushed or loosened (DeVay et al., 1965). Crushed or loosened bark provides an attractive environment where insects that vector C. fimbriata can multiply. The major insects implicated in the transmission of C. fimbriata include a nitidulid beetle, Carpophilus freemani, a drosophilid fly, Chymomyza procnemoides, and to a lesser extent the American plum borer, Euzophera semifuneralis among others (Moller and DeVay, 1968). They also found that total exclusion of insects from bark injuries prevented infection by C. fimbriata. Bostock (1983) found that trunk injuries on 'Nonpareil' almond became resistant to C. fimbriata infection after 8 to 10 days due to natural wound healing mechanisms if initial infection was avoided. The situation may be different when the American plum borer is present. Their feeding greatly Options Méditerranéennes, Série A, Numéro 63 199

enlarges the wound size after a primary mechanical bark injury has taken place. In addition, when a plum borer larva feeds in the cambium tissue it bores through the trees wound-healing zone and could be an important means of introducing C. fimbriata spores long after a mechanical injury occurs. Plum borer larvae prefer to attack young, injured, or weakened trees wherever callous tissue has formed (Van Steenwyk et al., 1986). In September and October we observed plum borer larvae actively feeding in the callous tissues associated with wound healing in bark injuries that occurred during August trunk shaker harvest operations. Our objective was to treat these bark injuries to control future plum borer feeding and thus reduce the likelihood of subsequent Ceratocystis canker development. Materials and methods A commercial orchard that sustained many trunk injuries during shaker harvest in August was selected for this trial. Sixty 'Nonpareil' almond trees with bark wounds were identified and treated in October. Twenty replications of three different s, each applied to single trees, were arranged in the orchard using a randomized complete block design. All wounds were initially treated the same. Injured bark was removed and wound edges were cleanly trimmed using a hammer and chisel to cut back to healthy, well attached bark at least 2.5 cm beyond any signs of C. fimbriata infection. The three s implemented on these cleaned wounds in mid-october included an untreated control, diazinon combined with diluted white interior latex paint, and cupric hydroxide combined with boiled linseed oil. The interior white latex paint was diluted, 1 part paint: 3 parts water, with insecticide added at a rate of 90 g Diazinon 50W per liter of dilute paint. This mixture was spray applied using an average of 118.3 ml of solution per treated wound. The cupric hydroxide-linseed oil mixture was prepared using Kocide 101 (77% cupric hydroxide) added to boiled linseed oil at a rate of 222.7g Kocide 101 per liter of linseed oil. This mixture was brush applied using an average of 31.6 ml per treated wound. American plum borer flight activity in the orchard was monitored during the growing season for two years following the wound s using Trece Inc. Pherocon sticky traps baited with American plum borer female sex pheromone lures. American plum borer larvae produce characteristic orangered frass piles as they feed in the cambium. Treatment effectiveness relative to American plum borer control was gauged by counting the number of active frass piles per wound at 5 weeks and 7 months after. There was no plum borer activity observed at later sampling dates. The effect on subsequent Ceratocystis canker occurrence was measured by counting the number of distinct gumming cankers at the edges of treated tree wounds. Counts were made: in July, 9 months after ; in January, 15 months after ; and in October, 5 years after. We relied on naturally occurring pest populations to produce results in this trial. Both insect and disease pressure was not distributed uniformly over all replications. Statistical analysis of plum borer data excluded all replicates with no insect populations where the replicate mean for frass piles was equal to zero. Statistical analysis of Ceratocystis canker data excluded all replicates with minimal disease pressure including only those replicates where the mean was greater than 1 canker per replicate. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple range test. Results and discussion Pheromone trap monitoring indicated that there was some level of plum borer activity occurring in the orchard throughout the entire growing season. This observation is supported by Flint (2002a) who suggests that plum borers have 3 to 4 generations per year with each generation taking 4 to 6 weeks for the insect to develop from egg to adult. They overwinter in sheltered locations in the tree as mature larvae in cocoons with the majority of moths emerging in April and May. Although the flight activity was greatest in April during both years monitored during this trial, the number of moths per trap per night was much higher in the second season (Fig. 1). In November, five weeks after, both chemical s significantly reduced the number of plum borer strikes compared to the untreated (Table 1). The insecticide 200 Options Méditerranéennes, Série A, Numéro 63

combined with diluted white latex paint provided complete control. By the following May, 7 months after, neither the copper nor the diazinon differed significantly from the control. This is consistent with results found by Van Steenwyk et al. (1986) that insecticide-paint combinations provided nearly complete control initially but that control began to break down two to three months after application. Fig. 1. American plum borer, Euzophera semifuneralis, male flight activity throughout the two growing seasons following the application of tree wound s. Table 1. American plum borer larvae visibly feeding at the edges of treated tree wounds as evidenced by the presence of orange-red frass piles Wound Rate Number of frass piles per wound November 5 weeks after May 7 months after Untreated 2.5 a 1.1 ab Kocide 101/boiled linseed oil 222.7 g/l 1.3 b 2.9 a Diazinon 50W/dilute white latex paint 90 g/l 0.0 b 0.4 b All wounds were initially treated the same. Injured bark was removed and wound edges were trimmed to well attached bark cut back 2.5 cm beyond any signs of C. fimbriata infection. Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05. Both the copper-oil and diazinon-paint s significantly reduced the number of Ceratocystis cankers per wound compared to the untreated at 9 months after application (Table 2). At fifteen months following there were no differences between the s. Five years after the trial began, the copper oil had significantly fewer cankers than the untreated. By this time the diazinon-paint did not differ from either the untreated or the Options Méditerranéennes, Série A, Numéro 63 201

copper-oil (Table 2). According to Flint (2002b), some Ceratocystis cankers apparently become inactive and heal after two or three growing seasons. Thus, trees that are consistently damaged by harvesters year after year are the most severely affected by this canker. Table 2. Distinct Ceratocystis cankers established at the edges of treated tree wounds as evidenced by the presence of amber colored gum exuding from the bark Wound Rate Number of cankers per wound July 9 months after January 15 months after October 5 years after Untreated 2.9 a 2.3 3.4 a Kocide 101/boiled linseed oil 222.7 g/l 1.0 b 1.3 0.4 b Diazinon 50W/dilute white latex paint 90 g/l 1.4 b 2.2 ns 2.0 ab.all wounds were initially treated the same. Injured bark was removed and wound edges were trimmed to well attached bark cut back 2.5 cm beyond any signs of C. fimbriata infection..values followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P = 0.05. Cleaning up injuries by removing damaged bark and treating these trunk wounds is costly in terms of both time and labor. By far, the best way to avoid Ceratocystis cankers and subsequent tree loss is to provide good training to mechanical shaker operators and to regularly maintain harvesting equipment to avoid bark injuries in the first place. Conclusions Trimming back crushed, torn, or loosened bark to well attached bark and treating the wound with an insecticide-paint or copper-oil does reduce the number of plum borer strikes compared to untreated wounds. The number of Ceratocystis cankers that subsequently occur are also reduced by these s and the copper-oil may provide benefits for several years. References Bostock, R.M. (1983). Ceratocystis Canker Control. 1982 Annual Report Almond Research Projects, Almond Board of California, Modesto, pp. 32-33. DeVay, J.E., Lukezic, F.L., English, W.H., Moller, W.J. and Parkinson, B.W. (1965). Controlling Ceratocystis canker of stone fruit trees. California Agriculture, 19(10): 2-4. Flint, M.L. (ed.) (2002a). Integrated Pest Management for Almonds. American Plum Borer. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication 3308, pp. 100-101. Flint, M.L. (ed.) (2002b). Integrated Pest Management for Almonds. Ceratocystis Canker, University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication 3308, pp. 116-118. Moller, W.J. and DeVay, J.E. (1968). Insect transmission of Ceratocystis fimbriata in deciduous fruit orchards. Phytopathology, 58: 1499-1508. Van Steenwyk, R.A., Hendricks, L.C., Barclay, L.W. and Younce, E.L. (1986). Borer control in young almond trees. California Agriculture, 40(3&4): 10-11. 202 Options Méditerranéennes, Série A, Numéro 63