Impacts of Crawfish, Catfish, and Shrimp Imports on U.S. Domestic Prices. Young-Jae Lee P. Lynn Kennedy

Similar documents
Appendix A. Table A.1: Logit Estimates for Elasticities

Taiwan Fishery Trade: Import Demand Market for Shrimps. Bith-Hong Ling

FACTORS DETERMINING UNITED STATES IMPORTS OF COFFEE

Tariff vs non tariff barriers in seafood trade

Trade Economics of Olives and Olive Oil: Data and Issues. Sacramento Valley Olive Day. Orland, July 6, 2018

OF THE VARIOUS DECIDUOUS and

Emerging Local Food Systems in the Caribbean and Southern USA July 6, 2014

J / A V 9 / N O.

Dairy Market. Overview. Commercial Use of Dairy Products. U.S. Dairy Trade

Relationships Among Wine Prices, Ratings, Advertising, and Production: Examining a Giffen Good

Red wine consumption in the new world and the old world

Economics 452 International Trade Theory and Policy Fall 2012

ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE FLORIDA CITRUS INDUSTRY IN

Since the cross price elasticity is positive, the two goods are substitutes.

and the World Market for Wine The Central Valley is a Central Part of the Competitive World of Wine What is happening in the world of wine?

The supply and demand for oilseeds in South Africa

DERIVED DEMAND FOR FRESH CHEESE PRODUCTS IMPORTED INTO JAPAN

Slade Gorton Monthly Market Report January 2018

Vegetable Imports Approaching 20% of Total

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

ETHIOPIA. A Quick Scan on Improving the Economic Viability of Coffee Farming A QUICK SCAN ON IMPROVING THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF COFFEE FARMING

Monthly Economic Letter

Gasoline Empirical Analysis: Competition Bureau March 2005

Buying Filberts On a Sample Basis

Institutional Structure and Profit Maximization in the Eastern Bering Sea Fishery for Alaska Pollock

Preview. Introduction. Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

Downward correction as funds respond to increasingly positive supply outlook

Dairy Market. Overview. Commercial Use of Dairy Products

United States Sugar Trade

The substitutability among Japanese, Taiwanese and South Korean fronzen tuna

CHINA'S ANTIDUMPING INVESTIGATIONS AGAINST CELLULOSE PULP By Michael Stone

U.S. Dry Bean Market Update: 2018

Performance of the ASEAN Iron and Steel Industry in 2017 and Outlook

An Empirical Analysis of the U.S. Import Demand for Nuts

Efficacy of U.S. Antidumping Duties: The Case of Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat. Mohamed Sebaq

Commercial Crawfish Fishing in the Gulf of Mexico States

Monthly Economic Letter

Problem Set #15 Key. Measuring the Effects of Promotion II

AJAE Appendix: Testing Household-Specific Explanations for the Inverse Productivity Relationship

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Vegetable Spotlight Broccoli

Citrus: World Markets and Trade

McDONALD'S AS A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITY

Effects of political-economic integration and trade liberalization on exports of Italian Quality Wines Produced in Determined Regions (QWPDR)

Update on ASEAN Steel Industry Development Scenario

Sunflower seed COMMODITY PROFILE

Labor Supply of Married Couples in the Formal and Informal Sectors in Thailand

2016 China Dry Bean Historical production And Estimated planting intentions Analysis

PRODUCTION AND EXPORT PERFORMANCE OF CARDAMOM IN INDIA

Detecting Melamine Adulteration in Milk Powder

Structural Reforms and Agricultural Export Performance An Empirical Analysis

Flexible Working Arrangements, Collaboration, ICT and Innovation

Preview. Introduction (cont.) Introduction. Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost (cont.) Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost

Economic Losses from Pollution Closure of Clam Harvesting Areas in Machias Bay

Analysis of Fruit Consumption in the U.S. with a Quadratic AIDS Model

Statistics & Agric.Economics Deptt., Tocklai Experimental Station, Tea Research Association, Jorhat , Assam. ABSTRACT

Composition and Value of Loin Primals

Harvesting Soybean. Soybean Loss. John Nowatzki Extension Agricultural Machine Systems Specialist

Chapter 3 Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

MBA 503 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

ICC September 2018 Original: English. Emerging coffee markets: South and East Asia

The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois,

2004 Grape Juice Concentrate Summary Report and Future Projections

PROCEDURE million pounds of pecans annually with an average

An analytical economic study of production and export of Green beans in Egypt

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

Impacts of the U.S.-Central America Free Trade Agreement on the U.S. Sugar Industry

Tariff Endogeneity: Effects of Export Price of Desiccated Coconuts on Edible Oil Market in Sri Lanka

Valuing Health Risk Reductions from Air Quality Improvement: Evidence from a New Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) in China

Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model. Pearson Education Limited All rights reserved.

PTNPA Other Nut Report. Bobby Tankersley JOHN B. SANFILIPPO & SON

Chile. Tree Nuts Annual. Almonds and Walnuts Annual Report

Missing Data Treatments

SLADE GORTON & CO SEAFOOD MARKET REPORT February 2014

Record exports in coffee year 2017/18

(A report prepared for Milk SA)

UKRAINE Climate conditions and soil in Ukraine are suitable for growing nut trees.

MARKET ANALYSIS REPORT NO 1 OF 2015: TABLE GRAPES

RESTAURANT OUTLOOK SURVEY

2016 World wine production estimated at 259 mhl, a fall of 5% compared with 2015

Peaches & Nectarines and Cherry Annual Reports

HONDURAS. A Quick Scan on Improving the Economic Viability of Coffee Farming A QUICK SCAN ON IMPROVING THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF COFFEE FARMING

Demand, Supply and Market Equilibrium. Lecture 4 Shahid Iqbal

Coffee market ends 2016/17 coffee year in deficit for the third consecutive year

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF WINE ECONOMISTS

UPPER MIDWEST MARKETING AREA THE BUTTER MARKET AND BEYOND

A Note on a Test for the Sum of Ranksums*

Dairy Outlook. December By Jim Dunn Professor of Agricultural Economics, Penn State University. Market Psychology

Comparative Analysis of Fresh and Dried Fish Consumption in Ondo State, Nigeria

Introduction Methods

Citrus Fruits 2014 Summary

Figure 1: Quartely milk production and gross value

Volatility returns to the coffee market as prices stay low

As Serious a Threat as HLB: The Collapsing Orange Juice Market

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BEER TOURISM IN KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN

January 2015 WORLD GRAPE MARKET SUPPLY, DEMAND AND FORECAST

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

Overview. U.S. Dry Bean Market Update: 2017 U.S. Dry Bean Market Update: U.S. Production 7/21/2017

The premium for organic wines

Consistently higher production and more exportable supplies from Thailand are major factors in the decline in world rice prices in 2014 and continued

Transcription:

Impacts of Crawfish, Catfish, and Shrimp Imports on U.S. Domestic Prices Young-Jae Lee P. Lynn Kennedy

Common Market Issues Imports increasing (relatively higher marginal cost of production in U.S.) Low domestic prices Decrease in domestic production Domestic consumption increasing (new cuisine, health concerns, etc) Homogeneity (between imported and domestically produced goods)

Crawfish Market Louisiana is the leader in freshwater crawfish production Most crawfish cultured in rice field - rice-crawfish integrated faming system Crawfish are routinely graded into three sizes - large, medium: whole live or whole boiled - small: processed tail meat

Louisiana s crawfish industry was affected negatively by massive imports of crawfish tail meat from China. Imported crawfish tail meat displaced more than 90% of Louisiana s domestic crawfish meat market. Rice-crawfish producers lost markets for small crawfish and were deprived of a significant source of income. Louisiana s crawfish industry lost an estimated 4,000 full-time and part-time jobs

LAES developed management practices to increase production of larger, high-valued crawfish and to reduce production costs to compete with imports. Researchers identified overcrowding, food shortages and overharvesting as the major causes for the harvests of small crawfish. An inter-cropping strategy was developed whereby small crawfish could be relayed into a growing rice crop to increase in size and subsequent market value, while preserving acceptable rice yields. Research continues to develop effective supplemental feeding and forage systems, along with strategies to increase production of large crawfish by preventing overcrowding.

LCES, LDAF, and producer and processor groups worked successfully to have the U.S. Department of Commerce impose an antidumping tariff on the imported Chinese crawfish meat. The Byrd Amendment directs the U.S. Bureau of Customs and Border Protection to distribute monies to companies that petitioned or supported antidumping tariff action

MT CRAWFISH $/lb 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 Year 4.50 4.00 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 CRIM CRDP CRRP Source: National Marine Fisheries Service (www.nmfs.gov)

Harvesting farm raised Crawfish under controlled water conditions ensures a quality product Crawfish are washed and inspected prior to boiling. Some are hand selected for live sales

Parboiling is accomplished with specially built equipment operated under careful supervision Crawfish is peeled in a sanitary environment

Packers check the crawfish meat to assure quality The crawfish meat is bagged and iced for fresh shipment, or bagged and quick-frozen

Domestic Crawfish Tail Meat Price: $13.99 Chinese Crawfish Tail Meat Price: $5.99

Catfish Market Mississippi, Arkansas, Alabama, and Louisiana are the leaders in freshwater catfish production - Four states produce 94% of catfish production Three Market Issues for catfish - low prices - increase in imports of catfish from Vietnam - high feed and fuel cost

Since 2000, catfish industry has suffered because of low prices in the market place by the influx of imported catfish Low prices received by producers in 2002 ($0.57/pound) and 2003 ($0.58/pound) have caused economic hardship for Mississippi producers resulting in a decrease of 10,000 acres since 2002. While catfish prices improved in 2004, higher catfish feed prices and increasing fuel prices mostly negated gains.

Imports of Vietnamese catfish have been increasingly displacing U.S. farm-raised catfish in the seafood market at alarming rates, prompting the catfish industry to push for a labeling law as a way to even the playing field. The labeling legislation in both Mississippi and Alabama mandates that only catfish produced by U.S. growers in fresh-water ponds may be labeled as farm-raised catfish.

Source: National Marine Fisheries Service (www.nmfs.gov)

Shrimp Market Shrimp imports continuously increases From 2000-2003, import volumes of shrimp increased from 466 million lbs to a 795 million lbs. Average unit value of shrimp imported fell $3.48 in 2003 from $5.12 in 2000. However, consumer prices increased from $8.99 to $10.13 during the period, indicating that the middleman makes more money.

MT SHRIMP $/lb 3000000 2500000 2000000 1500000 1000000 500000 0 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 Year 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 SHIM SHDP SHRP Source: National Marine Fisheries Service (www.nmfs.gov)

Objectives Develop a practical means of determining the impact of a given import volume change on domestic prices Confirm the extent of substitutability between the domestic good, the imported good, and other related domestic and imported goods Account for any simultaneity between domestic demand and supply

Model Construction SUR used to improve the efficiency of estimation since the error terms of the individual model of each commodity assumed to be correlated Double log inverse functional form used for computational efficiency of estimating direct price flexibility

Model (1) LnP i = β 0 + β 1 LnQ i + β 2 LnM + ε i Where P i : domestic deflated price of good i Q i : sum of domestic production and imports of good i M : disposable personal income (deflated) ε i : random error of good i equation This model assumed that imported good is homogeneous with the domestic good

Coefficients z-value R-sq lncrrp lncarp lnshrp lncrtp lndpi cons lncatp lndpi cons lnshtp lndpi cons -0.193613.5562793-4.256993 -.0136783-1.630246 20.90025 -.0259273 -.6499444 8.934105-2.18** 3.18*** -2.43** -0.36-7.55*** 10.28*** -0.75-4.19*** 6.13***.1608.5930.3029 ** Statistically significant at 0.05 *** Statistically significant at 0.01 Breusch-Pagan test of independence: chi2(3) = 26,572, Pr=.000

Model (2) LnP i = β 0 + β 1 LnQ im + β 2 LnQ i dp + β 3 M+ ε i Where P i : the domestic deflated price of good i Q m i : quantity imported of good i Q dp i : domestic production of good i M : disposable personal income (deflated) : random error of good i equation ε i This model assumed that imported good is imperfect substitute for the domestic good

Coefficients z-value R-sq lncrrp lncarp lnshrp lncrim lncrdp lndpi cons lncaim lncadp lndpi cons lnshim lnshdp lndpi cons.0039543 -.0101395.3860132-2.649495 -.0118953.0421111-1.614861 20.40368 -.0586744.0023958 -.5853478 8.616902 0.39-1.56 1.41-0.97-0.73 0.64-6.84*** 9.11*** -1.04 0.14-2.97*** 5.01***.1766.5932.3375 ** Statistically significant at 0.05 *** Statistically significant at 0.01 Breusch-Pagan test of independence: chi2(3) = 18.575, Pr=.0003

Model (3) LnQ id = β 0 + β 1 LnP i + β 2 LnP sub + β 3 M + ε Where Q d i : domestic consumption of good i P i : domestic deflated price of good I P sub : prices of related goods (deflated) M : disposable personal income (deflated) ε i : random error of good i equation This model is intended to estimate the direct price elasticity of domestic consumption

lncrtc lncrrp lncarp lnshrp lncrp lnbrp lnprp lndpi cons Coefficients z-value R-sq.1611-3.194202-3.02** -2.509099-1.95* 5.49965 3.64*** 6.238571 1.25 7.779057 1.67* -8.152992-3.67*** 8.243192 2.21*** -104.5128-2.17*** * Statistically significant at 0.1 ** Statistically significant at 0.05 *** Statistically significant at 0.01

lncatc lncrrp lncarp lnshrp lncrp lnbrp lnprp lndpi cons Coefficients z-value R-sq.2409 -.2242735-0.40-1.563742-2.30 2.083718 2.61 3.600531 1.37 1.955375 0.79-4.902892-4.19 5.49705 2.80-48.26718-1.90 * Statistically significant at 0.1 ** Statistically significant at 0.05 *** Statistically significant at 0.01

lnshtc lncrrp lncarp lnshrp lncrp lnbrp lnprp lndpi cons Coefficients z-value R-sq.5348.2502224 1.59 -.246655-1.29 -.5156072-2.30** 1.256228 1.69* 1.276607 1.84* -.0706469-0.21 1.221085 2.21** -13.27914-1.86* * Statistically significant at 0.1 ** Statistiaally significant at 0.05 *** Statistically significant at 0.01

Model (4) LnP i = β 0 + β 1 LnQ i m + β 2 LnQ i dp + β 3 LnQ sub m + β 4 LnQ sub dp + β 5 M + ε i Where P i : domestic deflated price of good i Q i m : quantity imported of good i Q i dp : domestic production of good i Q sub m : imported related goods Q sub dp : domestically produced related goods M : disposable personal income (deflated) ε i : random error of good i equation This model is formulated to examine the effects of imported goods, domestically produced goods, imported substitutes, domestically produced substitutes, and income on price of good i.

Coefficients z-value R-sq lncrrp Lncrim Lncrdp Lncaim Lncadp Lnshim Lnshdp Lntrim Lntrdp Lnclim Lncldp Lnoyim Lnoydp Lnchdp Lnbeim Lnbedp Lnpoim lnpodp lndpi.0145752 -.0218853.0775607.0700430 -.0922511 -.0540776.0271522 -.023263.3790101 -.4603106 -.0308759.1137226.1850238 -.0483960-1.061886 -.3721848 -.950888 20.28446 1.32-2.67*** 4.01*** 1.07-0.75-1.09 0.71-1.06 2.88*** -3.18*** -0.60 1.03 0.68-0.30-1.84* -3.41*** -3.02*** 4.08***.6354

Coefficients z-value R-sq lncarp Lncrim Lncrdp Lncaim Lncadp Lnshim Lnshdp Lntrim Lntrdp Lnclim Lncldp Lnoyim Lnoydp Lnchdp Lnbeim Lnbedp Lnpoim lnpodp lndpi.0196824 -.0109774 -.0245091.0354892 -.3686209 -.0110388 -.1606493 -.0346855.1284506 -.0202018.1395033 -.0863347.0483282 -.3396428 -.7265112 -.0216063 -.2516292 18.84889 2.09** -1.57-1.49 0.64-3.49*** -0.26-4.96*** -1.86* 1.15-0.16 3.16*** -0.92 0.21-2.77*** -1.47-0.23-0.94 4.45***.8596

Coefficients z-value R-sq lnshrp Lncrim Lncrdp Lncaim Lncadp Lnshim Lnshdp Lntrim Lntrdp Lnclim Lncldp Lnoyim Lnoydp Lnchdp Lnbeim Lnbedp Lnpoim lnpodp lndpi.0153578 -.0148222.0108443.091933 -.2081161 -.0197898 -.0499616 -.0185006.1819674 -.1859421.0632402 -.1596893.3098524 -.0634384-1.550843 -.3814473 -.0561254 19.14251 2.13** -2.78*** 0.86 2.16** -2.58*** -0.61-2.02** -1.30 2.13** -1.97** 1.87* -2.23** 1.76* -0.68-4.12*** -5.37*** -0.27 5.92***.7814

Conclusions Domestic price of Crawfish is shown to have a positive relationship with imports of crawfish while domestic prices of Catfish and Shrimp have a negative relationship with imports Imports of Crawfish stimulated by a domestic price increase caused by decreased domestic production

Conclusions (cont.) Crawfish, Catfish and Shrimp were shown to be normal goods Clam and Pork significantly related to domestic crawfish price Trout and Beef significantly related to domestic catfish price Clam, Oyster, Beef, and Pork significantly related to domestic shrimp price.

Questions? ylee2@lsu.edu lkennedy@agcenter.lsu.edu