Table 1: Number of patients by ICU hospital level and geographical locality.

Similar documents
Gail E. Potter, Timo Smieszek, and Kerstin Sailer. April 24, 2015

wine 1 wine 2 wine 3 person person person person person

The multivariate piecewise linear growth model for ZHeight and zbmi can be expressed as:

Inspirational Recipes by Fast Ed

Vegetable Spotlight Broccoli

PROMOTING CHOICE Schools

Wine Clusters Equal Export Success

Multiple Imputation for Missing Data in KLoSA

Flexible Working Arrangements, Collaboration, ICT and Innovation

Faculty of Science FINAL EXAMINATION MATH-523B Generalized Linear Models

Feeding habits of range-shifting herbivores: tropical surgeonfishes in a temperate environment

Measuring economic value of whale conservation

Relationships Among Wine Prices, Ratings, Advertising, and Production: Examining a Giffen Good

Comparing R print-outs from LM, GLM, LMM and GLMM

Appendix A. Table A1: Marginal effects and elasticities on the export probability

International Table Grape Symposium November 2014 Australian Table Grapes Jeff Scott Chief Executive Officer

Peaches & Nectarines and Cherry Annual Reports

Recent Developments in Wheat Quality & Classification in Australia By Dr Irfan Hashmi

2017 Catering Nominations

Foodservice Market Prospects

Feature /AH13064_AC AHHA 2013 Australian Health Review, 2013, 37(4),

Counting the Cost The Impact of Sunday Penalty Rate Reductions on Urban Australia

Internet Appendix to. The Price of Street Friends: Social Networks, Informed Trading, and Shareholder Costs. Jie Cai Ralph A.

Tim Woods Lia Nogueira Shang Ho Yang Xueting Deng WERA 72 Meetings 2014

Australia s best Gourmet Fish & Chips 5 star meals cooked and prepared by top Chefs for you at takeaway prices!!

Method for the imputation of the earnings variable in the Belgian LFS

VEGAN LIFESTYLE IN AUSTRALIA KEY TRENDS AND STATISTICS

SAMPLE FILE - Australian Exports of Fresh Navel Oranges

National Vintage Report 2017

THE AUSTRALIAN FOODSERVICE MARKET FUTURE IN FOODSERVICE SEPTEMBER 11, 2017

Reimbursement Rates for Some 2014 HCPCS Procedure Codes to Be Implemented for the CSHCN Services Program

Poisson GLM, Cox PH, & degrees of freedom

Final Exam Financial Data Analysis (6 Credit points/imp Students) March 2, 2006

Soft & Mould Cheese. Cheese & Butter. Camembert & Brie. Blue Cheese CHEESE & BUTTER MILK FRESH DAIRY FLAVOURED MILK CHEESE & BUTTER MILK FRESH DAIRY

Problem. Background & Significance 6/29/ _3_88B 1 CHD KNOWLEDGE & RISK FACTORS AMONG FILIPINO-AMERICANS CONNECTED TO PRIMARY CARE SERVICES

STA Module 6 The Normal Distribution

STA Module 6 The Normal Distribution. Learning Objectives. Examples of Normal Curves

Appendix A. Table A.1: Logit Estimates for Elasticities

Midterm Economics 181 International Trade Fall 2005

MARKET ANALYSIS REPORT NO 1 OF 2015: TABLE GRAPES

AJAE Appendix: Testing Household-Specific Explanations for the Inverse Productivity Relationship

A brief history of Cactoblastis cactorum and its effects on Florida native Opuntia

Online Appendix for. Inattention and Inertia in Household Finance: Evidence from the Danish Mortgage Market,

Dietary Diversity in Urban and Rural China: An Endogenous Variety Approach

Missing value imputation in SAS: an intro to Proc MI and MIANALYZE

저작권법에따른이용자의권리는위의내용에의하여영향을받지않습니다.

Business Statistics /82 Spring 2011 Booth School of Business The University of Chicago Final Exam

FOODSERVICE CATALOGUE 2018 EDITION

Curtis Miller MATH 3080 Final Project pg. 1. The first question asks for an analysis on car data. The data was collected from the Kelly

Online Appendix to. Are Two heads Better Than One: Team versus Individual Play in Signaling Games. David C. Cooper and John H.

Statistics & Agric.Economics Deptt., Tocklai Experimental Station, Tea Research Association, Jorhat , Assam. ABSTRACT

For personal use only

THE AUSTRALIAN FOODSERVICE MARKET

Winery reputation in explaining wine clusters: A spatial analysis of Hunter Valley wine producers

IT 403 Project Beer Advocate Analysis

Wine Economics Research Centre Wine Policy Brief No. 6

Missing Data Treatments

Truffles and value-adding

Whether to Manufacture

You know what you like, but what about everyone else? A Case study on Incomplete Block Segmentation of white-bread consumers.

SA Winegrape Crush Survey Regional Summary Report 2017 South Australia - other

RESEARCH UPDATE from Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute by Natalia Kolyesnikova, PhD Tim Dodd, PhD THANK YOU SPONSORS

Northern Region Central Region Southern Region No. % of total No. % of total No. % of total Schools Da bomb

Comparative Analysis of Dispersion Parameter Estimates in Loglinear Modeling

Imputation of multivariate continuous data with non-ignorable missingness

A Web Survey Analysis of the Subjective Well-being of Spanish Workers

BORDEAUX WINE VINTAGE QUALITY AND THE WEATHER ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS

SOUTH AFRICA: ESTIMATES OF SUPPORT TO AGRICULTURE DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

The age of reproduction The effect of university tuition fees on enrolment in Quebec and Ontario,

Activity 10. Coffee Break. Introduction. Equipment Required. Collecting the Data

Return to wine: A comparison of the hedonic, repeat sales, and hybrid approaches

ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MAIZE CULTIVATED AREA AND PRODUCTION IN ROMANIA

Adelaide Plains Wine Region

Missing Data Methods (Part I): Multiple Imputation. Advanced Multivariate Statistical Methods Workshop

The R survey package used in these examples is version 3.22 and was run under R v2.7 on a PC.

What does radical price change and choice reveal?

Labor Supply of Married Couples in the Formal and Informal Sectors in Thailand

Tariff vs non tariff barriers in seafood trade

Taiwan Fishery Trade: Import Demand Market for Shrimps. Bith-Hong Ling

Fleurieu zone (other)

The impact of a continuous care intervention for treatment of type 2 diabetes on health care system utilization

Japan Consumer Trial Results

Population Trends 139 Spring 2010

Growth and Cycles in Australia s Wine Industry:

Update to A Comprehensive Look at the Empirical Performance of Equity Premium Prediction

Export market trends and outlook

Wine Quality and Varietal, Regional and Winery Reputations: Hedonic Prices for Australia and New Zealand

Buying Filberts On a Sample Basis

The Roles of Social Media and Expert Reviews in the Market for High-End Goods: An Example Using Bordeaux and California Wines

Forecasting the Value of Fine Wines

National Media Kit Promotional opportunities overview Helping you reach your target market

Draft Action Statement - Small Business Regulation Review (Retail Sector)

Wine Rating Prediction

segregation and educational opportunity

Valuation in the Life Settlements Market

STATE OF THE VITIVINICULTURE WORLD MARKET

An application of cumulative prospect theory to travel time variability

Predictors of Repeat Winery Visitation in North Carolina

Citrus Attributes: Do Consumers Really Care Only About Seeds? Lisa A. House 1 and Zhifeng Gao

Seeka Limited. Retail Investors March 2019

Transcription:

Web-based supporting materials for Evaluating the performance of Australian and New Zealand intensive care units in 2009 and 2010, by J. Kasza, J. L. Moran and P. J. Solomon Table 1: Number of patients by ICU hospital level and geographical locality. ICU geographical locality ICU level NT NSW ACT SA VIC WA NZ QLD TAS Total Rural 704 7479 0 0 6578 0 2068 4519 0 21348 Metropolitan 1449 9186 1149 1456 7992 0 599 6709 754 29294 Tertiary 0 20752 2865 7587 17801 2663 6497 10572 1850 70587 Private 0 13629 0 3729 9055 616 0 15537 0 42566 Total 2153 51046 4014 12772 41426 3279 9164 37337 2604 163795 1

var(log(smr)), assuming expected number of deaths fixed 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 var(log(smr)) Figure 1: Estimated variances of the log-smrs of each ICU estimated under the assumption that the expected number of deaths is fixed, plotted against the estimated variances of the log-smrs of each ICU. The line is the y = x line, and indicates that variances of the log-smrs are underestimated when the expected number of deaths is assumed to be fixed. 2

3 Table 2: Stage 1 and Stage 2 model parameter estimates. All patients in the hematologic category were non-surgical, so no parameters were estimated for the interaction of hematologic with patient surgical status. Age and APACHE III have been scaled so that coefficients correspond to 10-year/unit increases. For example, for each 10 years that age increases, the log odds of in-hospital mortality increases by 0.2352, and for each 10 units that APACHE III increases, the log odds of in-hospital mortality increases by 0.5922. For factor variables, the interpretation is the increase relative to the baseline level. For example, being an elective surgical patient, versus a non-surgical patient, decreases the log odds of in-hospital mortality by 1.48. Log odds p-value 95% CI Log odds p-value 95% CI Age 0.2352 < 0.0001 0.2165 0.2540 0.2338 < 0.0001 0.2150 0.2525 Age squared 0.0134 < 0.0001 0.0074 0.0194 0.0132 < 0.0001 0.0072 0.0192 APACHE III score 0.5922 < 0.0001 0.5662 0.6181 0.5927 < 0.0001 0.5667 0.6190 APACHE III score squared -0.0099 < 0.0001-0.0123-0.0075-0.0098 < 0.0001-0.0122-0.0074 Age APACHE III score -0.0208 < 0.0001-0.0255-0.0160-0.0205 < 0.0001-0.0253-0.0158 Gender -0.0392 0.0519-0.0787 0.0003-0.0386 0.0559-0.0781 0.0010 Patient Category

4 Table 2 continued from previous page Gastrointestinal -0.1604 0.0088-0.2803-0.0404-0.1657 0.0068-0.2857-0.0458 Metabolic -1.3120 < 0.0001-1.5375-1.0866-1.3118 < 0.0001-1.5373-1.0865 Neurologic 0.5154 < 0.0001 0.3798 0.6511 0.5173 < 0.0001 0.3818 0.6528 Respiratory 0.5605 < 0.0001 0.4691 0.6518 0.5574 < 0.0001 0.4661 0.6487 Trauma -0.6107 < 0.0001-0.8525-0.3688-0.6081 < 0.0001-0.8498-0.3663 Renal/ genitourinary -0.5210 < 0.0001-0.7300-0.3121-0.5250 < 0.0001-0.7339-0.3162 Hematologic -1.4325 < 0.0001-1.6054-1.2596-1.4228 < 0.0001-1.5958-1.2498 Patient surgical status Elective surgery -1.4800 < 0.0001-1.6290-1.3310-1.4825 < 0.0001-1.6316-1.3334 Emergency surgery -0.4517 < 0.0001-0.6173-0.2862-0.4459 < 0.0001-0.6114-0.2804 Ventilation 0.4132 < 0.0001 0.3144 0.5120 0.4115 < 0.0001 0.3129 0.5102 ICU source -0.1172 0.0043-0.1977-0.0367-0.1163 0.0046-0.1968-0.0359 Patient category APACHE III score Gastrointestinal APACHE III -0.0080 0.5436-0.0338 0.0178-0.0068 0.6068-0.0326 0.0190 Metabolic APACHE III 0.0540 0.0220 0.0078 0.1003 0.0532 0.0242 0.0069 0.0995 Neurologic APACHE III -0.0651 < 0.0001-0.0938-0.0363-0.0650 < 0.0001-0.0938-0.0363 Respiratory APACHE III -0.0700 < 0.0001-0.0931-0.0469-0.0694 < 0.0001-0.0925-0.0463 Trauma APACHE III 0.1144 < 0.0001 0.0699 0.1588 0.1135 < 0.0001 0.0691 0.1580 Renal/ genitourinary APACHE III -0.0744 0.0038-0.1248-0.0241-0.0739 0.0040-0.1242-0.0235 Hematologic APACHE III 0.1755 < 0.0001 0.1315 0.2194 0.1775 < 0.0001 0.1334 0.2215 Patient category surgical status

5 Table 2 continued from previous page Gastrointestinal Elective surgery 0.9718 < 0.0001 0.7831 1.1605 0.9720 < 0.0001 0.7834 1.1607 Gastrointestinal Emergency surgery 0.1965 0.0348 0.0140 0.3789 0.1950 0.0361 0.0126 0.3774 Metabolic Elective surgery 1.3411 0.0013 0.5231 2.1592 1.3072 0.0022 0.4716 2.1429 Metabolic Emergency surgery -0.2544 0.7408-1.7614 1.2527-0.3019 0.6974-1.8237 1.2198 Neurologic Elective surgery 0.4580 < 0.0001 0.2099 0.7061 0.4992 < 0.0001 0.2508 0.7476 Neurologic Emergency surgery 0.4593 < 0.0001 0.2596 0.6590 0.4586 < 0.0001 0.2590 0.6582 Respiratory Elective surgery 0.4595 < 0.0001 0.2210 0.6980 0.4589 < 0.0001 0.2202 0.6977 Respiratory Emergency surgery -0.0600 0.6708-0.3368 0.2168-0.0588 0.6770-0.3356 0.2179 Trauma Elective surgery 1.2053 < 0.0001 0.6756 1.7350 1.1951 < 0.0001 0.6659 1.7243 Trauma Emergency surgery 0.3698 0.0030 0.1257 0.6139 0.3663 0.0033 0.1223 0.6103 Renal/ genitourinary Elective surgery 0.2623 0.1948-0.1342 0.6589 0.2679 0.1853-0.1285 0.6643 Renal/ genitourinary Emergency surgery -0.2044 0.3167-0.6046 0.1957-0.2065 0.3118-0.6065 0.1936 Hematologic Elective surgery (empty) (empty) Hematologic Emergency surgery (empty) (empty) Patient surgical status APACHE III score Elective surgery APACHE III 0.0327 0.0494 0.0001 0.0653 0.0330 0.0488 0.0002 0.0658 Emergency surgery APACHE III -0.0009 0.9433-0.0254 0.0239-0.0016 0.8997-0.0261 0.0229 Ventilation APACHE III score -0.0967 < 0.0001-0.1166-0.0768-0.0968 < 0.0001-0.1167-0.0769 Ventilation Patient category Ventilation Gastrointestinal 0.0244 0.7140-0.1061 0.1548 0.0259 0.6973-0.1046 0.1563 Ventilation Metabolic -0.3177 0.0198-0.5849-0.0506-0.3150 0.0208-0.5821-0.0478

6 Table 2 continued from previous page Ventilation Neurologic 0.3435 < 0.0001 0.1878 0.4992 0.3410 < 0.0001 0.1854 0.4966 Ventilation Respiratory -0.2879 < 0.0001-0.4072-0.1687-0.2857 < 0.0001-0.4049-0.1665 Ventilation Trauma 0.4147 0.0021 0.1505 0.6790 0.4181 0.0019 0.1540 0.6823 Ventilation Renal/ genitourinary 0.1613 0.2686-0.1245 0.4472 0.1611 0.2691-0.1246 0.4469 Ventilation Hematologic -0.7024 < 0.0001-0.9172-0.4876-0.7166 < 0.0001-0.9315-0.5018 Annual volume 0.0000 0.8760-0.0001 0.0002 0.0000 0.5013-0.0001 0.0002 Geographical locality Northern Territory -0.0109 0.9567-0.4035 0.3818-0.3166 0.1163-0.0785 0.0712 Australian Capital Territory 0.0054 0.9775-0.3668 0.3775-0.0500 0.7339-0.3383 0.2383 South Australia -0.0783 0.4793-0.2951 0.1386-0.1323 0.1324-0.3045 0.0400 Victoria -0.0230 0.7391-0.1583 0.1123-0.0750 0.1952-0.1886 0.0385 Western Australia -0.1149 0.5729-0.5146 0.2847-0.2115 0.1987-0.5340 0.1110 New Zealand 0.1846 0.0990-0.0347 0.4039 0.1254 0.1560-0.0478 0.2986 Queensland -0.0193 0.7809-0.1552 0.1166-0.1223 0.0387-0.2383-0.0634 Tasmania 0.0768 0.6925-0.3038 0.4574 0.0295 0.8471-0.2707 0.3297 Hospital level Rural 0.0355 0.7097-0.1514 0.2225 0.0891 0.2827-0.0734 0.2515 Metropolitan 0.0530 0.5277-0.1114 0.2174 0.0779 0.2870-0.0734 0.2213 Private -0.1025 0.2445-0.2751 0.0701-0.0971 0.2343-0.2571 0.0629 Hospital level surgical status Rural Elective surgery -0.4365 0.0043-0.7364-0.1365-0.4378 0.0042-0.7375-0.1380

7 Table 2 continued from previous page Rural Emergency surgery -0.3074 0.0014-0.4959-0.1189-0.3095 0.0013-0.4979-0.1211 Metropolitan Elective surgery -0.0595 0.5726-0.2662 0.1472-0.0557 0.5964-0.2621 0.1506 Metropolitan Emergency surgery -0.1343 0.0826-0.2859 0.0174-0.1335 0.0841-0.2849 0.0180 Private Elective surgery -0.5672 < 0.0001-0.7396-0.3947-0.5491 < 0.0001-0.7219-0.3763 Private Emergency surgery -0.4358 0.0001-0.6580-0.2137-0.4470 < 0.0001-0.6693-0.2246 Hospital level ICU source Rural ICU source -0.1798 0.1265-0.4104 0.0508-0.1946 0.0974-0.4247 0.0355 Metropolitan ICU source -0.2320 0.0031-0.3859-0.0781-0.2325 0.0031-0.3863-0.0787 Private ICU source -0.1441 0.2219-0.3754 0.0871-0.1396 0.2357-0.3703 0.0911 Intercept -2.7713 < 0.0001-2.9135-2.6291-2.721 < 0.0001-2.8443-2.5983 Random-effect parameters Estimate SE Estimate SE APACHE III coefficient variance 0.0031835 7.74 10 4 0.0031348 7.84 10 4 Intercept variance 0.0542223 0.01158 0.0271328 0.00734 Covariance of APACHE III and Intercept -0.0249955 0.02370-0.0187596 0.01879 Separate intercepts and APACHE III coefficients for potentially unusual ICUs (Stage 2 model only) Intercepts APACHE III coefficients Log odds p-value 95% CI Log odds p-value 95% CI 100-3.4701 < 0.0001-3.9109-3.0294 0.6424 < 0.0001 0.4717 0.8131 57-3.6413 < 0.0001-4.2617-3.0208 0.7384 < 0.0001 0.5212 0.9557 48-3.4918 < 0.0001-4.1032-2.8803 0.4822 < 0.0001 0.3611 0.6032

Table 2 continued from previous page 72-3.3026 < 0.0001-3.9429-2.6623 0.5547 < 0.0001 0.3972 0.7121 108-3.0452 < 0.0001-3.5209-2.5694 0.3948 < 0.0001 0.2523 0.5374 49-3.1316 < 0.0001-3.5538-2.7094 0.5489 < 0.0001 0.4622 0.6355 19-3.2824 < 0.0001-3.9574-2.8094 0.5879 < 0.0001 0.3314 0.8443 45-3.5060 < 0.0001-4.0035-3.0084 0.7152 < 0.0001 0.5982 0.8322 93-2.0473 < 0.0001-2.5652-1.5294 0.6081 < 0.0001 0.4150 0.8013 81-2.0476 < 0.0001-2.4185-1.6768 0.5104 < 0.0001 0.3787 0.6421 44-1.9800 < 0.0001-2.4387-1.5213 0.6845 < 0.0001 0.4800 0.8891 16-2.0124 < 0.0001-2.3170-1.7079 0.5958 < 0.0001 0.4931 0.6985 8