QUANTIFICATION OF AVOIDABLE YIELD LOSSES IN OILSEED BRASSICA CAUSED BY INSECT PESTS

Similar documents
BIO-EFFICACY OF NEWER INSECTICIDES AGAINST POD BORER COMPLEX OF PIGEONPEA [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh] *PATEL, S. A. AND PATEL, R. K.

SCREENING OF DIFFERENT VARIETIES /ACCESSIONS OF MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA) AGAINST LIPAPHIS ERYSIMI (KALT.) UNDER NATURAL CONDITIONS

INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH DIRECTORATE OF RAPESEED-MUSTARD RESEARCH, BHARATPUR, INDIA

Comparison of Sclerotinia rot incidence and sclerotial formation in different rapeseed-mustard species

LOWER HILLS OF HIMACHAL PRADESH

Effect of Storage Period and Ga3 Soaking of Bulbs on Growth, Flowering and Flower Yield of Tuberose (Polianthes Tuberosa L.) Cv.

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

Eco-Friendly Management of Brinjal Shoot and Fruit Borer (Leucinodes orbonalis Guenee) in Allahabad, India

MONTHLY REPORTS EDIBLE OIL JUNE - JULY 2016

Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare ISSN (Paper) ISSN X (Online) Vol.4, No.8, 2014

INFLUENCE OF SEED VIGOUR ON CROP GROWTH AND YIELD OF BSH-1 HYBRID SUNFLOWER UNDER NORMAL AND COMPENSATED SEED RATES

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

RELATIVE ABUNDANCE OF APHIDS POPULATION ON DIFFERENT BRASSICA GENOTYPES

Effect of Sowing Time on Growth and Yield of Sweet Corn Cultivars

India. Oilseeds and Products Update. August 2012

PERFORMANCE OF FOUR FORAGE TURNIP VARIETIES AT MADRAS, OREGON, J. Loren Nelson '

POC 2018 PALM & LAURIC OILS PRICE OUTLOOK CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION. Emerging Trends In The Edible Oil Sector A View From Pakistan..

PERMIT TO ALLOW MINOR USE OF AN AGVET CHEMICAL PRODUCT

Thermal Requirement and Fruit Tree Response of Ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.) Cultivars in a Semi-arid Region of Punjab

Response of Three Brassica Species to High Temperature Stress During Reproductive Growth

IMPACT OF RAINFALL AND TEMPERATURE ON TEA PRODUCTION IN UNDIVIDED SIVASAGAR DISTRICT

PRODUCTION AND EXPORT PERFORMANCE OF CARDAMOM IN INDIA

Relative efficacy of some insecticides for the control of tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis theivora (Waterhouse) in Bangladesh

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

Effect on Quality of Cucumber (Pant Shankar Khira-1) Hybrid Seed Production under Protected Conditions

Management of Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera Hubner) Infesting Marigold (Tagetes erecta)

Overcoming challenges to developing varieties resistant to Sclerotinia - managing pathogen variation. Photos: Caixia Li

Evaluation of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) genotypes for growth and yield characters under Chhattisgarh condition

Effects of Preharvest Sprays of Maleic Hydrazide on Sugar Beets

1. Evaluated published leaf, petiole and stem as inoculation sites

THE EVALUATION OF WALNUT VARIETIES FOR CALIFORNIA S CENTRAL COAST REGION 2007 HARVEST

PERMIT TO ALLOW MINOR USE OF AN AGVET CHEMICAL PRODUCT FOR THE CONTROL OF CERTAIN PESTS ON BRASSICA LEAFY VEGETABLES AND RADISHES.

Chapter 3 PERFORMANCE OF SPICES TRADE IN INDIA AND KERALA

(Definition modified from APSnet)

ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MAIZE CULTIVATED AREA AND PRODUCTION IN ROMANIA

GRAIN SORGHUM. Tifton, Georgia: Early-Planted Grain Sorghum Hybrid Performance, 2012 Nonirrigated. 2-Year Average Yield

Statistics & Agric.Economics Deptt., Tocklai Experimental Station, Tea Research Association, Jorhat , Assam. ABSTRACT

Reliable screening technique for evaluation of wild crucifers against mustard aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.)

SUDAN EXPERIENCE IN Reducing Post harvest losses SALAH BAKHIET& WIDAD ABDELRAHMAN

Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) a small fruit tree

Aexperiencing rapid changes. Due to globalization and

The supply and demand for oilseeds in South Africa

Studies on the performance of different genotypes of cauliflower grown in plains and higher altitude of Kerala

K. C. KANODIA AND P. RAI Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi ABSTRACT

Marvin Butler, Rhonda Simmons, and Ralph Berry. Abstract. Introduction

Groundnut Production in India Scope for Extended Cultivation

Relative infestation of red pumpkin beetle on different cucurbit vegetables

MONTHLY COFFEE MARKET REPORT

YIELD PERFORMANCE OF STRAWBERRY GENOTYPES. Abstract

Dune - the first canola quality Brassica juncea (Juncea canola) cultivar and future Juncea canola research priorities for Australia

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

ALTERNATIVE CONTROL METHODS FOR GRAPE LEAFHOPPER: PART 2 FINAL REPORT 1/22/01

2008 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR

World Trends and Technology in Sunflower Production, Crushing and Consumption

Effect of Weather Factors on Seasonal Incidence of Insect-Pests of Soybean

GLOBOIL INTERNATIONAL Emerging Trends In The Edible Oil Sector A View From Pakistan.. Abdul Rasheed Janmohammed

SCREENING OF OKRA HYBRIDS AND VARIETIES FOR RESISTANCE TO FRUIT BORERS

Post harvest management practice in disposal of cashewnut

Yield Comparisons of Bt and Non-Bt Corn Hybrids in Missouri in 1999

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Efficacy of Various Insecticides on Safflower fly, Acanthiophilus helianthi Rossi (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Kohgiloyeh and Boyerahmad Province (Iran)

PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR ABSTRACT

Evaluation of microbial pesticides against major foliage feeders on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]

Soybean Oil and Palm Oil Account For An Increasing Share of World Vegetable Oil Consumption

CONTROL OF RED PALM WEEVIL, RHYNCHOPHORUS FERRUGINEUS OLIVER USING PROPHYLACTIC SPRAYING OF DATE PALMS AND TRUNK INJECTION

EVAL U A TION OF BARAMASI LEMON GERMPLASM UN DER PUNJAB CON DI TIONS

Comparing canola and lupin varieties by time of sowing in the Northern Agricultural Region

Commodity Profile for Sugar, September, 2017

The grape is one of the ancient fruit crop of India, which

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

STUDIES ON AGRONOMIC MANIPULATIONS FOR IMPROVING THE SEED YIELD AND QUALITY OF KBSH-1 SUNFLOWER HYBRID SEED PRODUCTION

CERTIFIED PRODUCTION OF CANOLA, MUSTARD, RADISH, AND RAPESEED

World Scenario: Oilseed Production

ORGANOLEPTIC EVALUATION OF RECIPES BASED ON DIFFERENT VARIETIES OF MAIZE

DETERMINATION OF MATURITY STANDARDS OF DATES ABSTRACT

ANNUAL REPORT SUGARCANE ENTOMOLOGY

Quality of Canadian non-food grade soybeans 2014

Evaluation of six different groups of insecticides for the control of citrus psylla Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae)

Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research Vol. 15, 2007: 35-40

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

B.T. Pujari and M.N. Sheelvantar. Department of Agronomy, University of Agricultural Sciences, DhalWad , India ABSTRACT

Commodity Profile for Sugar, March, 2017

Pruning studies in some white wine grape varieties for yield and quality parameters under Western Maharashtra conditions

Preparation for future white rust epidemics in Brassica juncea in Western Australia

Analysis of Bunch Quality in Oil Palm Hybrid Cross Combinations under Krishna-Godavari Zone of Andhra Pradesh, India

Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018; 7(3): Amit Tomar, Mahak Singh and LP Tiwari

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

Acreage Forecast

Trap crops for diamondback moth and other crucifer pests in Guam

Report of Progress 961

Influence of fungicides and cultivar on development of cavity spot of carrot.

Research Report: Use of Geotextiles to Reduce Freeze Injury in Ontario Vineyards

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

Materials and Methods

PREPARATION OF SAPOTA CANDY

TEBUFENOZIDE EXPLANATION

Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015

Spotted wing drosophila in southeastern berry crops

Transcription:

JOURNAL OF PLANT PROTECTION RESEARCH Vol. 51, No. 1 (2011) QUANTIFICATION OF AVOIDABLE YIELD LOSSES IN OILSEED BRASSICA CAUSED BY INSECT PESTS Jagdev Singh Kular 1 *, Sarwan Kumar 1 * Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India 1 Department of Entomology 1 Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics Received: May 13, 2010 Accepted: November 16, 2010 Abstract: A six year field study was conducted from 2001 2002 to 2006 2007 at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India to study the losses in seed yield of different Brassica species (B. juncea,, B. carinata, B. rapa and Eruca sativa) by the infestation of insect pests. The experiment was conducted in two different sets viz. protected/sprayed and unprotected, in a randomized block design, with three replications. Data on the infestation of insect pests, and seed yield were recorded at weekly intervals and at harvest, respectively. The loss in seed yield, due to mustard aphid and cabbage caterpillar, varied from 6.5 to 26.4 per cent. E. sativa suffered the least loss in seed yield and harboured the minimum population of mustard aphid (2.1 aphids/plant) and cabbage caterpillar (2.4 larvae/plant). On the other hand, B. carinata was highly susceptible to the cabbage caterpillar (26.2 larvae/plant) and suffered the maximum yield loss (26.4%). Key words: Brassica species, Lipaphis erysimi, Pieris brassicae, avoidable yield loss INTRODUCTION India is the largest importer and third largest consumer of edible oils after China and the European Union, with a consumption of over 10 MT (Metric tones) of edible oils per year (Agarwal 2007). To make India self sufficient in oilseed production, we have to increase the production and productivity of these oilseeds. In India, these energy rich oilseed crops are grown mostly under energy deprived conditions, on marginal lands and poor soils. Among the various oilseed crops, the oilseed Brassica species, also collectively called rapeseed-mustard, is composed largely of B. juncea, B. rapa, and B. carinata. Rapeseed-mustard is ranked third at the global level preceded by soybean and palm oil (Agnihotri and Prem 2007). About 44 per cent of the world s average production of rapeseed-mustard has been contributed by developing countries, in particular China and India (FAOSTAT 2007). The yield potential of rapeseed-mustard has not been fully realized due to limits imposed upon it by a number of biotic and abiotic factors. Among the various biotic factors, the attack of insect pests is the major limiting factor in achieving higher productivity. A number of insect pests are known to attack rapeseed-mustard right from sowing till harvest. Only a few of the inects cause serious losses. According to Dhaliwal et al. (2004), rapeseed-mustard in India generally suffers a 30 per cent yield loss due to insect pests. This loss amounts to 27 300 million of indian rupees, annually (approximately 600 million US dollars). The estimation of crop damage due to insect pests is critical to pest management as it helps in assigning priorities on the basis of relative importance of different pests, evaluating crop varieties for their resistance to pests and deciding the allocations for research and extension in plant protection. In Punjab, rapeseed-mustard suffers yield losses mainly due to the attack of the mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi Kaltenbach and cabbage caterpillar, Pieris brassicae (Linnaeus). The activity and subsequent severity of these pests varies under different agro climatic condition. For this reason,, a need was felt to generate location specific information about the amount of damage that these pests inflict on different oilseed Brassica. The present study was undertaken to generate location specific information about the amount of damage inflicted on oilseed Brassicas by insect pests, and to identify gentotypes that suffer the least damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was conducted during six rabi crop seasons from 2001 2002 to 2006 2007 at the oilseeds research farm of the Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India. The assessment of yield losses was done on five major groups of rapeseed-mustard viz. Brassica juncea,, B. carinata, B. rapa and Eruca sativa. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design, with two different sets viz. protected and unprotected. The crop was sown in the third *Corresponding address: js_kular@rediffmail.com, sarwanent@gmail.com

Quantification of avoidable yield losses in oilseed Brassica caused by insect pest 39 week of October. Plot size was kept at 4x3 m and there were 6 replications for each Brassica species, with 3 each for protected and unprotected sets. The protected set was kept free from the attack of insect pests by spraying it three times with Metasystox 25 EC (oxydemeton methyl 25 EC) and Thiodan 35 EC (endosulfan 25 EC) @ 1250 ml/ha at 15 days interval. In the unprotected set, only water spray was done at the time of the insecticidal spray in the protected set. Weekly observations, for the incidence of insect pests, were made from 10 plants selected at random from each plot. At the time of harvest, data on seed yield from protected and unprotected plots were recorded, and the per cent yield losses were computed. The data on pest incidence and yield loss for the six years were pooled together to have an overall picture of the loss in yield due to pest incidence. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Aphid population In 2001 2002 crop season, the population of mustard aphid varied from 0.0 to 23.8 aphids/plant in the unprotected set while the protected set was free from any infestation of insect pests. The maximum population of 23.8 aphids/plant was observed on non Canola variety, while there was no population on E. sativa (Table 1). In 2002 2003, again the E. sativa was free from aphid population in the unprotected set while the maximum population of 21.1 aphids/plant was observed on B. rapa. It was followed by non Canola (20.6 aphids/ plant), Canola (15.7 aphids/plant) and B. carinata (10.2 aphids/plant). In the protected set, a very low population of 0.7 and 3.9 aphids/plant was observed on Canola and B. rapa, respectively. The remaining genotypes were free from aphid infestation. In 2003 2004, E. sativa harboured a minimum population of 3.3 aphids/plant in the unprotected set while the maximum population was observed on B. juncea (17.3 aphids/plant). It was followed by B. rapa (15.7 aphids/ plant), non Canola (12.4 aphids/plant), B. carinata (7.5 aphids/plant) and Canola (7.3 aphids/plant). In the protected set a very low population of 0.7 and 1.5 aphids/plant was observed on B. carinata and non Canola, respectively. The remaining genotypes were free from aphid infestation. In 2004 2005, E. sativa and B. juncea were not tested. Thus, among the four genotypes, a minimum population of 6.3 aphids/plant was observed on non Canola, while the maximum population of 32.0 aphids/plant was observed on Canola. It was followed by B. rapa (25.6 aphids/plant) and B. carinata (7.3 aphids/plant). In the protected set, a very negligible population of 1.5 aphids/plant was observed on Canola. Other genotypes were free from aphid infestation. In 2005 2006, E. sativa harboured a minimum population of only 5.0 aphids/plant in the unprotected set, while the maximum population of 97.7 aphids/plant was observed on Canola. It was followed by B. rapa (92.3 aphids/plant), Canola (51.5 aphids/plant), B. juncea (38.0 aphids/plant) and B. carinata (20.0 aphids/ plant). In the protected set, a very low population of 1.5 and 2.0 aphids/plant was observed on B. juncea and non Canola, respectively. The remaining genotypes were free from aphid infestation. In 2006 2007, again the minimum population of 2.4 aphids/plant was observed on E. sativa while the maximum population was observed on Canola (24.9 aphids/plant). It was followed by B. carinata (24.6 aphids/plant), non Canola (20.3 aphids/plant) and B. juncea (12.4 aphids/plant). The protected set was free from aphid infestation. From the pooled data of six years, it is evident that the mustard aphid population varied from 2.1 to 32.4 aphids/ plant on different genotypes. The maximum population of 32.4 aphids/plant was observed on B. rapa. The aphid population on the genotypes E. sativa and B. carinata (2.1 and 13.7/plant, respectively) was significantly lower than that on B. rapa. Cabbage caterpillar population In the 2001 2002 crop season the cabbage caterpillar population varied from 2.6 to 35.8 larvae/plant in the unprotected set. The protected set was free from any cabbage caterpillar infestation. The minimum cabbage caterpillar population of 2.6 larvae/plant was observed on E. sativa while the maximum population on B. rapa was (35.8 larvae/plant) (Table 2). It was followed by non Canola (35.3 larvae/plant), B. carinata (29.8 larvae/ plant), B. juncea (14.3 larvae/plant) and Canola (4.6 larvae/plant). In 2002 2003, again the minimum population of 0.3 larvae/plant was observed on E. sativa while it was maximum on B. carinata (9.5 larvae/plant) in the unprotected set. Almost the same trend was observed in 2003 2004 and 2004 2005, however, E. sativa was not included in 2004 2005. In 2005 2006, E. sativa was free from any cabbage caterpillar population, while the maximum population was observed on B. carinata (29.0 larvae/plant). Almost the same trend was observed in 2006 2007, with minimum population (8.3 larvae/plant) on E. sativa and maximum (58.3) on B. carinata. From the pooled data of six years, it is evident that the cabbage caterpillar population varied from 2.4 to 26.2 larvae/plant on different genotypes. It was maximum (26.2 larvae/plant) on B. carinata and minimum (2.4 larvae/plant) on E. sativa. The population on B. carinata was significantly lower than on the remaining genotypes. Avoidable yield loss In 2001 2002, the loss in the yield by insect pests varied from 3.1 to 35.3 per cent on different genotypes (Table 3). The maximum yield loss (35.3%) was observed in genotype non Canola. It was followed by B. juncea (10.7%) and B. carinata (9.2%). The remaining three genotypes suffered much less yield loss. Canola, E. sativa and B. rapa, had a yield loss of 5.7, 5.2 and 3.2 per cent, respectively. Tables 1, 2 show the aphid and cabbage caterpillar population numbers. From the data in these tables it is evident that the 35.3 per cent yield loss in non Canola corresponded with the high aphid population of 23.8 aphids/plant, and high cabbage caterpillar population of 35.3 larvae/plant under unsprayed condi-

40 Journal of Plant Protection Research 51 (1), 2011 Table 1. Number of L. erysimi on different Brassica species Number/plant 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 mean P* UP** P UP P UP P UP P UP P UP P UP B. juncea PBR-91 0.0 2.6 0.0 17.3 1.5 38.0 0.0 12.4 0.4 17.6 0.0 23.8 0.0 20.6 1.5 12.4 0.0 6.3 2.0 51.5 0.0 20.3 0.6 22.5 0.0 9.2 0.7 15.7 0.0 7.3 1.5 32.0 0.0 97.7 0.0 24.9 0.4 31.1 B. carinata PC-5 0.0 12.5 0.0 10.2 0.7 7.5 0.0 7.3 0.0 20.0 0.0 24.6 0.1 13.7 B. rapa var. brown BSH-1 0.0 7.4 3.9 21.1 0.0 15.7 0.0 25.6 0.0 92.3 0.8 32.4 E. sativa TMLC 2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 5.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 2.1 * P protected; **UP unprotected Table 2. Number of P. brassicae larvae on different Brassica species Number of larvae/plant 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 mean P* UP** P UP P UP P UP P UP P UP P UP B. juncea PBR-91 0.0 14.3 0.7 4.5 0.0 7.0 0.0 21.6 0.2 11.9 0.0 35.3 1.0 7.7 0.0 1.3 0.0 1.5 0.0 10.1 0.0 33.3 0.2 14.9 0.0 4.6 0.0 6.3 0.0 3.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 1.7 0.0 28.3 0.0 7.8 B. carinata PC-5 0.0 29.8 0.5 9.5 2.0 13.3 0.0 17.3 0.0 29.0 0.0 58.3 0.4 26.2 B. rapa var. brown BSH-1 0.0 35.8 0.0 3.7 0.9 3.7 0.0 5.3 0.0 20.0 0.2 13.7 E. sativa TMLC 2 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 2.4 * P protected; ** UP unprotected

Quantification of avoidable yield losses in oilseed Brassica caused by insect pest 41 Table 3. Loss in seed yield due to damage by insect pests, in different Brassica species Per cent loss in seed yield 2001 2002 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 2005 2006 2006 2007 mean B. juncea PBR-91 10.7 5.7 4.8 5.2 6.8 35.3 32.6 1.5 4.6 18.0 19.7 20.7 5.7 21.5 10.0 22.5 17.6 8.2 11.6 B. carinata PC-5 9.2 24.8 16.7 57.3 33.2 19.8 26.4 B. rapa var. brown BSH-1 3.1 33.4 9.7 28.8 15.9 16.7 E. sativa TMLC 2 5.2 0.0 2.9 13.3 4.8 6.5 Table 4. Population of insect pests and seed yield in different Brassica species (pooled data from over a period of 6 years) Aphid population/plant Cabbage caterpillars/plant Yield [q/ha] Yield loss [%] P* UP** P UP P UP Brassica juncea PBR-91 0.4 17.6 0.2 11.9 20.3 18.9 6.8 0.6 22.5 0.2 14.9 14.9 11.8 20.7 0.4 31.1 0.0 7.8 16.8 14.4 11.6 B. carinata PC-5 0.1 13.7 0.4 26.2 16.7 12.3 26.4 B. rapa var. brown BSH-1 0.8 32.4 0.2 13.7 9.7 8.1 16.7 E. sativa TMLC 2 0.0 2.1 0.0 2.4 5.5 5.2 6.5 CD (p = 0.05) NS 18.6 NS 11.3 5.04 4.7 * P protected; ** UP unprotected

42 Journal of Plant Protection Research 51 (1), 2011 tions, in 2001 2002. Similarly, the low yield loss (5.2%) in E. sativa corresponded with no aphid population and the low cabbage caterpillar population (2.6 larvae/plant). The yield loss in B. rapa was minimum (3.1%), although it harboured 35.8 larvae/plant of cabbage caterpillar. In 2002 2003, the yield loss in different genotypes varied from 0.0 to 33.4 per cent. The yield loss was maximum in B. rapa followed by non Canola (32.6%), B. carinata (24.8%) and Canola (21.5%). However, no yield loss was observed in E. sativa. In genotype B. rapa, the maximum yield loss corresponded with the maximum population of mustard aphid (21.1 aphids/ plant) and 3.7 larvae/plant of cabbage caterpillar under unsprayed conditions. No population of mustard aphid was observed in E. sativa, while the population of the cabbage caterpillar was only 0.3 larvae/plant. Consequently, there was no yield loss in this genotype. The yield loss in 2003 2004 varied from 1.5 to 16.7 per cent on different genotypes. The genotype B. carinata recorded the maximum yield loss (16.7%). It was followed by Canola (10.0%), B. rapa (9.7%), B. juncea (5.7%), E. sativa (2.9%) and non Canola (1.5%). In B. carinata, the maximum yield loss corresponded with the maximum population of cabbage caterpillar (13.3 larvae/plant) under unsprayed conditions, while the population of mustard aphid was 7.5 aphids/plant. Similarly, the only 2.9 per cent yield loss in E. sativa corresponded with a minimum population of cabbage caterpillar (0.7 larvae/ plant) and low population of mustard aphid (3.3 aphids/plant). In 2004 2005, the loss in seed yield varied from 4.6 per cent to as high as 57.3 per cent. The maximum loss (57.3%) in B. carinata corresponded with the maximum population of cabbage caterpillar (17.3 larvae/ plant) under unsprayed conditions, while the population of mustard aphid was 7.3 aphids/plant. The high loss in yield i.e. 28.8 and 22.5 per cent in B. rapa and Canola corresponded with high aphid population i.e. 25.6 and 32.0 aphids/plant, respectively. The loss in yield was minimum (4.6%) in non Canola, which corresponded with the minimum population of mustard aphid (6.3 aphids/ plant) as well as cabbage caterpillar (1.5 larvae/plant). In 2005 2006, the yield loss in different species varied from 4.8 to 33.2 per cent. Similar to what had been observed in the previous year, the maximum loss in seed yield in B. carinata (33.2%) corresponded with the maximum population of cabbage caterpillar (29.0 larvae/plant) while the population of mustard aphid was 20.0 aphids/plant. It was followed by non Canola, Canola and B. rapa where the respective loss in seed yield was 17.9, 17.6 and 15.9 per cent. The yield loss in these genotypes corresponded with high aphid population i.e. 51.5, 97.7 and 92.3 aphids/plant in non Canola, Canola and B. rapa, respectively. The respective population of cabbage caterpillar was 10.7, 1.7 and 20.0 larvae/plant in these genotypes. In 2006 2007, the loss in yield in various genotypes varied from 4.8 to 19.8. The genotype B. carinata suffered the maximum loss in seed yield (19.8%) which corresponded with the maximum population of cabbage caterpillar (58.3 larvae/plant) and the high population of mustard aphid (24.6 aphids/plant). It was followed by non Canola and Canola (19.7 and 8.2% yield loss, respectively). The respective population of mustard aphid and cabbage caterpillar in these genotypes was 20.3 and 24.9 aphids/ plant and 33.3 and 28.3 larvae/plant. The minimum loss in seed yield (4.8%) in E. sativa corresponded with the minimum population of mustard aphid (2.4 aphids/plant) and cabbage caterpillar (8.3 larvae/plant). Pooled data Six years of pooled data on the loss in seed yield and population of the mustard aphid and cabbage caterpillar on different genotypes are presented in table 4. On the basis of six years of experiments, it can be stated that losses in various genotypes due to insect pests varied from 6.5 to 26.4 per cent. The genotype B. carinata suffered the maximum loss in seed yield (26.4%). It was followed by non Canola (20.7% loss), B. rapa (16.7%) and Canola (11.6%). The genotypes B. juncea and E. sativa suffered less than a 7 per cent loss in seed yield. The population of the mustard aphid varied from 2.1 to 32.4 aphids/plant under unprotected conditions. This aphid population was significantly lower in E. sativa than that in non Canola, Canola and B. rapa. The population of the cabbage caterpillar varied from 2.4 to 26.2 larvae/plant. The minimum population was observed in E. sativa (2.4 larvae/plant), which was significantly lower than non Canola, B. carinata and B. rapa. The maximum population of cabbage caterpillar (26.2 larvae/plant) was recorded for B. carinata. From the data it was evident that maximum yield loss (26.4%) in B. carinata corresponded with the maximum population of cabbage caterpillar (26.2 larvae/plant), while the population of mustard aphid was 13.7 aphids/ plant. On the other hand, the minimum yield loss (6.5%) in E. sativa corresponded with the minimum population of mustard aphid (2.1 aphids/ plant) as well as cabbage caterpillar (2.4 larvae/plant). Patel et al. (2004) reported the losses in seed yield of Indian mustard, B. juncea by the mustard aphid to be 76.0 to 100.0 per cent under unsprayed conditions. Singh and Sachan (1994) also reported avoidable losses due to mustard aphid which were up to 69.6 per cent. Similarly, Bakhetia (1984) observed a 57.8 to 80.6 per cent yield loss due to mustard aphid. In Haryana, Singh et al. (1993) reported 38.20 to 46.56 per cent yield losses in susceptible cultivars under unprotected conditions. However, no information was available in literature about the yield losses in oilseed Brassicas, by cabbage caterpillar. CONCLUSION Thus, from the present study it can be concluded that yield losses in oilseed Brassica by insect pests, particularly mustard aphid and cabbage caterpillar, vary from 6.5 to 26.4 per cent. E. sativa harboured a significantly lower population of mustard aphid and cabbage caterpillar than the remaining genotypes. B. carinata was highly susceptible to the attack of cabbage caterpillar and B. rapa, Canola and non Canola were susceptible to the attack of cabbage caterpillar.

Quantification of avoidable yield losses in oilseed Brassica caused by insect pest 43 REFERENCES Agarwal R.C. 2007. Indian Edible Oils Scenario. p. 27 32. In: Souvenir, National Seminar on Changing Global Vegetable Oils Scenario: Issues and Challenges Before India. Indian Society of Oilseeds Research. Hyderabad, January 29 31, 2007, 91 pp. Agnihotri A., Prem D. 2007. Oils Quality Improvement in Rapeseed-Mustard. p. 33 43. In: Souvenir, National Seminar on Changing Global Vegetable Oils Scenario: Issues and Challenges Before India. January 29 31, 2007, 91 pp. Bakhetia D.R.C. 1984. Chemical control of Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach) on rapeseed and mustard crop in Punjab. J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ. 21 (1): 63 75. Dhaliwal G.S., Arora R., Dhawan A.K. 2004. Crop losses due to insect-pests in Indian agriculture. Indian J. Ecol. 31 (1): 1 7. FAOSTAT 2007. Food and Agriculture Organization Statistics. http://fao.rog/faostat/ collection?subset=agriculture. Patel S.R., Awasthi A.K., Tomar R.K.S. 2004. Assessment of yield losses in mustard (Brassica juncea L.) due to mustard aphid (Lipaphis erysimi Kalt.) under different thermal environments in Eastern Central India. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2 (1): 1 15. Singh H., Singh B., Gupta S.K. 1993. Response of mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) to different cultivars of Brassica under protected and unprotected conditions. J. Insect Sci. 6 (1): 117 118. Singh C.P., Sachan G.C. 1994. Assessment of yield losses in yellow due to mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.). J. Oilseeds Res. 11 (2): 179 184. POLISH SUMMARY OCENA STRAT PLONU NASION ROŚLIN OLEISTYCH Z RODZAJU BRASSICA POWODOWANYCH PRZEZ SZKODNIKI W latach 2001 2007 na Uniwersytecie Rolniczym Penjab w Ludhianie (Indie), prowadzono 6-letnie badania polowe nad określeniem strat w plonach nasion różnych gatunków roślin, należących do rodzaju Brassica (Brassica junicea, B. carinata, B. rapa, Eruca sativa), spowodowanych przez szkodniki. Doświadczenie polowe założono metodą bloków losowanych w trzech powtórzeniach, z uwzględnieniem dwóch wariantów rośliny chronione/opryskiwane oraz kontrola rośliny nie chronione. Obserwacje nasilenia występowania szkodliwych owadów prowadzono z tygodniowymi przerwami, a dane dotyczące plonu uzyskano po zbiorze nasion. Straty plonu nasion spowodowane opanowaniem roślin przez mszycę Lipaphis erysimi oraz gąsienice bielinka kapustnika Pieris brassicae wynosiły 6,6 26,4%. Najmniejsze straty w plonach nasion stwierdzono w przypadku roślin rukoli (Eruca sativa), opanowanych w niewielkim stopniu przez populacje mszycy L. erysimi (2,1 mszyc/roślinę) i gąsienice kapustnych (2,4 larw/roślinę). Rośliny B. carinata były bardzo podatne na żerowanie gąsienic kapustnych (26.2 larw/roślinę) i reagowały maksymalną stratą plonu (26,4%).