Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

Similar documents
Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations in West Virginia

Pumpkin Variety Trial 2005

West Virginia Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations 2014

Pumpkin Variety Trial 2006

Evaluation of 16 Phytophthora capsici-tolerant Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

Evaluation of Bicolor and White Synergistic Sweet Corn in West Virginia

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Pumpkin Cultivar Observation Trial, Indiana 2007

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

PROCESSING CABBAGE CULTIVAR EVALUATION TRIALS. Department of Horticulture

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Evaluation of 17 Specialty Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C.

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

Evaluation of 15 Bell Pepper Cultivars in Southwest Michigan

2010 Report to the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

0\ Horticuilture Series 609 January 1990

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Tomato Variety Observations 2009

What Do you Get When You Mix Pumpkins, Cowpeas, Buckwheat and Mycorrhiza? Steven Kirk Field Supervisor

Parthenocarpic Cucumbers Are a Successful Double Crop for High Tunnels

Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015

2003 NEW JERSEY HEIRLOOM TOMATO OBSERVATION TRIAL RESULTS 1

CAULIFLOWER TRIAL,

Evaluation of 18 Bell Pepper Cultivars In Southwest Michigan

Edamame Variety Trial Phone: Fax: Materials and Methods

Organic Seed Partnership

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Ames Plantation, Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith. Interpretative Summary

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Variety Evaluation, New York, 2009

2011 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox and Phil Atkins Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Objective: To examine Romaine lettuce varieties for resistance to yellow spot disorder

Variety Name Seed Company Variety Name Seed Company. BHN 589 Seedway Mt. Merit Seedway. BHN 967 Siegers Seed Company Primo Red Harris Seed Company

WATERMELON AND CANTALOUPE VARIETY TRIALS, PO Box 8112, GSU Statesboro, GA

Report To The Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Crop Reports by Hal Kneen and Brad Bergefurd

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

Choosing and caring for your Harris Moran pumpkins

2006 Strawberry Variety Research Fresno County

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

2017 North Carolina and Tennessee Pumpkin Cultivar Evaluations Hort. Series # 219

Trial Report: Yellow Squash and Zucchini Spring and Fall Variety Evaluation 2015

1

Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary.

Lack of irrigation in 2002 reduced Riesling crop in Timothy E. Martinson Finger Lakes Grape Program

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

2013 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

~culture Series No. 5~

Title: Report, High Tunnel Fresh Market Slicer Tomato Variety Trial 2010

Yield, Income, Quality, and Blotchy Ripening Susceptibility of Staked Tomato Cultivars in Central Kentucky

2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais

EVALUATION OF FOURTEEN TOMATO CULTIVARS IN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN Ron Goldy & Virginia Wendzel Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center

Organic viticulture research in Pennsylvania. Jim Travis, Bryan Hed, and Noemi Halbrendt Department of Plant Pathology Penn State University

Yield Comparisons of Bt and Non-Bt Corn Hybrids in Missouri in 1999

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

Assessment of Specialty Potatoes for Powdery Scab Resistance

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

New Mexico Onion Varieties

Observations on Sunflower Rust in Nebraska and Management Efforts with Fungicide Application Timings

VEGETABLE CULTIVAR AND CULTURAL TRIALS

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

VARIETY TRIALS Shubin K. Saha and Dan Egel, SWPAC

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

THE 2017 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Edamame Variety Trial Report 1999

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

2016 High Tunnel Tomato Variety Trials

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

Pepper Research for Adaptation to the Delmarva Region 2017

Silage Yield Tons/A (70% Moisture) %CP %NDFd30. Silage Yield Tons/A (65% Moisture)

Crop Reports by Ron Becker, Hal Kneen and Brad

ACORN AND SPECIALTY WINTER SQUASH VARIETY EVALUATION. Methods and Materials

2009 Great Lakes Vegetable Working Group Heirloom Tomato Project Summary Indiana

Carol A. Miles, Ph. D., Agricultural Systems Specialist 1919 NE 78 th Street Vancouver, Washington 98665

Klamath Experiment Station

THE 2017 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

EVALUATION OF GRAPE AND CHERRY TOMATOES IN NORTHERN NEW JERSEY 2003

Report to Pennsylvania Vegetable Marketing and Research Program and Pennsylvania Vegetable Growers Association

Growing cucumbers in high tunnels

Title: Control of Wild Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in 'Jubilee' Sweet Corn in the Willamette Valley, 1987.

rciion egelaihe D Sweet corn varieties tested

ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF LOUISIANA SUGARCANE PRODUCTION IN 2017

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Cultivar Evaluation, New York 2007

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

What Effect do Nitrogen Fertilization Rate and Harvest Date Have on Cranberry Fruit Yield and Quality?

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000

Title: Evaluation of Apogee for Control of Runner Growth in Annual Plasticulture Strawberries

GRAIN SORGHUM. Tifton, Georgia: Early-Planted Grain Sorghum Hybrid Performance, 2012 Nonirrigated. 2-Year Average Yield

AVOCADO FARMING. Introduction

Transcription:

Disease Resistant Pumpkin Variety Evaluation - 2011 Timothy Elkner, Regional Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension Lancaster County 1383 Arcadia Rd., Rm. 140 Lancaster, PA 17601 Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County Thomas Butzler, Regional Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Clinton County Introduction Pumpkins are an important crop for many growers in the Mid-Atlantic region. Seed companies continue to develop new varieties for this important market. One important trait in many new varieties is powdery mildew tolerance or resistance. Variety evaluations on pumpkins have been conducted in SE PA for many seasons to compare new selections to current standards. This report is on pumpkin variety trials at three locations in PA in 2011. Procedures Seventeen varieties of medium pumpkins (7-24 lbs) and 12 varieties of large pumpkins (>24 lbs) were grown in Lancaster County, PA in 2011. The pumpkins were grown using the notill system and were watered via trickle irrigation. Spacing of the plants was as follows: medium 4 ft. in row and large 8 ft. in row; all rows were on 8 ft. centers. Plants were direct seeded on June 14 and recommended fertility, weed control and pest management practices were used. There were three 6-plant replicates per variety and fruit were harvested on September 29 and 30. Fifteen varieties of medium pumpkins (7-24 lbs) and 10 varieties of large pumpkins (>24 lbs) were grown in Centre County, PA in 2011. The pumpkins were grown on raised beds (but no plastic) and were watered via trickle irrigation. Spacing of the plants was as follows: medium 4 ft. in row and large 8 ft. in row; all rows were on 8 ft. centers. Plants were direct seeded on June 14 and recommended fertility, weed control and pest management practices were used. There were three 6-plant replicates per variety and fruit were harvested on September 28 and 29. Fifteen varieties of medium pumpkins (7-24 lbs) and three varieties of large pumpkin (>24 lbs) were grown in Northampton County, PA in 2011. The pumpkins were grown on bare soil with no irrigation. Spacing of the plants was as follows: medium 5.3 ft. in row and large 8 ft. in row; all rows were on 6 ft. centers. Plants were direct seeded on June 8 and recommended fertility, weed control and pest management practices were used. There was one 10-plant replicate per variety and fruit were harvested on September 14. Powdery mildew ratings were taken on 10 leaves per plot with % mildew coverage on both the upper and lower leaf surfaces recorded. Plots were also given an overall mildew infection rating on this date. Results The 2011 growing season started cold and wet and then became warm and wet. A period of hot, dry weather occurred in July but by August the rain had returned throughout the state and

September experienced record rainfall. The excessive moisture at harvest had a significant effect on the state s pumpkin crop and the three growing sites in this study suffered as well. Challenger had the highest estimated yield per acre in Lancaster County in the medium pumpkins, followed by Bunch O Warts, Camaro and Magic Lantern, all with estimates over 20 tons/acre (Table 1). Superior had the highest estimated yield per acre in Centre County followed by Challenger, Gold Challenger and Corvette (Table 5). Only Challenger had an estimate over 20 T/A. Bunch O Warts had the highest estimated yield in Northampton County, followed by Prudence, Diablo and 8616 with all estimates again over 20 T/A (Table 7). Average fruit size within a variety tended to be highest at the Centre County site. Gladiator and Charmed were particularly susceptible to fruit rot at the Lancaster site and had very low estimated yields/acre as a result. In Northumberland Challenger, Gold Challenger, Hannibal and Superior had low yields/per plot, again due to fruit loss. Apogee had the highest estimated yield per acre at Lancaster for the large pumpkins, followed by New Moon and Gold Medal, again all estimates were over 20 T/A (Table 2). Apogee had the highest estimated yields at Centre followed by 8545 and Spartan (Table 6); however, only Apogee had an estimate over 20 T/A. Howden XXX had low yields due to a combination of a poor stand and fruit rot at the Lancaster site. Rascal also had lower estimated yields at Lancaster and Centre than at Northumberland. Handle quality was better in the medium pumpkins as a group; several of the large pumpkins had handles that were not large enough or strong enough for their fruit size (Tables 3 & 4). Moonscape and Rascal are novelty pumpkins with a pinkish color Rascal tended to have more fruit with a pumpkin shape. Moonshine was a small white pumpkin that seemed to hold its white color well after maturity while New Moon was a very large white pumpkin with fruit over 60 lbs at the Lancaster site. Powdery mildew ratings taken on August 24 showed that some varieties possess a strong resistance to mildew infection (Table 7). However, yield did not appear related to the resistance level. Further observations are needed to determine the effect of mildew resistance on yield.

Table 1. Yield and seed source for 17 varieties of medium pumpkins grown in Lancaster County, PA in 2011. Number Average Estimated Seed Variety Fruit/Plt Fruit Wt. (lb) Yield (T/A) Source* 8616 0.9 20.3 12.3 OS Bunch O Warts 1.4 24.4 22.1 OS Camaro 1.8 17.8 20.2 HL Challenger 1.5 24.8 23.4 HL Charmed 1.5 11.3 8.6 AC Corvette 1.9 13.3 17.1 SG Diablo 1.1 18.4 11.2 SG Flat White Borer 1.8 7.9 8.0 SW Gladiator 0.9 15.7 8.9 HM Gold Challenger 1.4 15.2 12.1 RP Hannibal 0.8 20.8 10.2 SG Knucklehead 2.1 13.5 16.8 SG Magic Lantern 2.2 15.2 20.1 HM Moonscape 1.5 18.3 15.9 NE Moonshine 2.3 6.9 9.3 SG Prudence 1.3 15.1 12.6 OS Superior 1.6 15.1 16.0 OS *AC Abbott & Cobb, HL Hollar Seed, HM Harris Moran, NE neseed, OS Outstanding Seed, RP Rupp Seed, SG Seigers, SW - SeedWay Table 2. Yield and seed source for 12 varieties of large pumpkins grown in Lancaster County, PA in 2011. Number Average Estimated Seed Variety Fruit/Plt Fruit Wt. (lb) Yield (T/A) Source* 8545 1.9 26.7 13.1 OS Aladdin 2.0 21.6 12.2 HM Apogee (8614) 2.4 29.5 21.2 OS Captain Jack 1.9 30.8 17.5 SW Gold Medal 2.2 29.0 20.3 RP Harvest Time 1.6 27.0 12.3 AC Howden XXX 1.9 17.8 7.7 SW New Moon 1.3 54.2 20.5 SG Rascal 1.5 23.0 8.7 OS Solid Gold 1.9 22.3 11.4 RP Spartan 1.6 21.3 10.1 SW Summit 2.1 24.0 16.3 OS *AC Abbott & Cobb, HM Harris Moran, OS Outstanding Seed, RP Rupp Seed, SG Seigers, SW - SeedWay

Table 3. Fruit quality ratings for 17 varieties of medium pumpkins grown in Lancaster County, PA in 2011. Texture is rated on a scale of 1-5 with 1 being very smooth and 5 being heavily ribbed. Handles are rated 1-5 with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent. Variety Color Shape Texture Handle 8616 Orange Round 3.0 3.8 Bunch O Warts Orange Upright-round 2.5 3.5 Camaro Yellow orange Upright-round 2.0 2.5 Challenger Orange Variable 3.2 1.8 Charmed Orange Upright 2.8 3.0 Corvette Yellow orange Upright-round 1.8 3.0 Diablo Dark orange Round 3.3 3.5 Flat White Borer White Flat - 1.8 Gladiator Dark orange Upright-round 3.3 3.2 Gold Challenger Dark orange Round 3.2 3.3 Hannibal Dark orange Upright 2.7 3.0 Knucklehead Dark orange Upright-round 2.0 3.8 Magic Lantern Dark orange Upright-round 3.3 3.3 Moonscape Orange pink Round variable 1.8 Moonshine White Round 2.5 3.3 Prudence Orange Round:Upr-rnd 2.7 3.7 Superior Dark orange Round:Upr-rnd 3.7 4.0 Table 4. Fruit quality ratings for 12 varieties of large pumpkins grown in Lancaster County, PA in 2011. Texture is rated on a scale of 1-5 with 1 being very smooth and 5 being heavily ribbed. Handles are rated 1-5 with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent. Variety Color Shape Texture Handle 8545 Dark orange Variable 3.3 3.5 Aladdin Dark orange Upright 2.7 2.7 Apogee (8614) Orange Upright-round 4.0 3.8 Captain Jack Orange Upright (tall) 2.5 2.7 Gold Medal Dark orange Variable 3.3 3.3 Harvest Time Orange Upright (tall) 2.2 1.8 Howden XXX Dark orange Round:Upr-rnd 3.3 4.0 New Moon White Round 1.5 1.5 Rascal Pink Round 4.2 2.2 Solid Gold Orange Round 2.8 4.0 Spartan Dark orange Upright-round 3.8 2.8 Summit Orange Variable 3.3 3.2

Table 5. Yield for 15 varieties of medium pumpkins grown in Centre County, PA in 2011. Number Average Estimated Variety Fruit/Plt Fruit Wt. (lb) Yield (T/A) 8616 1.5 19.0 12.9 Bunch O Warts 0.8 26.0 14.0 Challenger 0.9 30.0 19.3 Charmed 1.0 19.0 13.2 Corvette 1.3 20.0 17.8 Diablo 0.8 22.0 12.5 Gladiator 1.0 18.0 12.1 Gold Challenger 1.2 23.0 18.5 Hannibal 0.9 24.0 15.5 Knucklehead 1.3 19.0 17.0 Magic Lantern 1.3 16.0 14.0 Moonscape 0.6 12.0 4.9 Moonshine 1.9 8.0 10.2 Prudence 1.0 19.0 12.9 Superior 1.4 23.0 22.3 Table 6. Yield for 10 varieties of large pumpkins grown in Centre County, PA in 2011. Number Average Estimated Variety Fruit/Plt Fruit Wt. (lb) Yield (T/A) 8545 1.4 28.0 13.1 Aladdin 0.7 32.0 7.9 Apogee (8614) 1.8 34.0 20.4 Captain Jack 1.0 34.0 11.7 Harvest Time 0.7 32.0 8.5 Howden XXX 0.9 24.0 7.4 Rascal 1.2 18.0 7.2 Solid Gold 1.1 22.0 7.9 Spartan 1.3 28.0 12.9 Summit 1.2 30.0 12.3

Table 7. Yield and powdery mildew ratings for 15 varieties of medium and three varieties of large pumpkins grown in Northampton County, PA in 2011. Average Estimated Avg. PM Avg. PM Plot Variety Fruit Wt. (lb) Yield (T/A) Upper Leaf (%) Lower Leaf (%) Rating* Medium 8616 17.4 23.7 8.5 4.0 0.5 Bunch O Warts 18.1 25.9 30.5 36.5 2.0 Challenger 27.6 9.4 10.0 6.0 1.0 Charmed 13.5 11.0 33.5 57.0 2.0 Corvette 16.2 19.9 15.0 5.5 1.0 Diablo 20.6 23.8 11.0 8.3 1.0 Gladiator 17.7 10.8 0.1 1.3 1.0 Gold Challenger 16.6 9.1 50.6 65.0 3.0 Hannibal 22.5 4.5 50.0 73.0 3.0 Knucklehead 12.0 19.5 50.0 70.0 3.0 Magic Lantern 15.6 18.1 26.0 46.5 2.5 Moonscape 11.3 9.3 29.5 44.0 2.0 Moonshine 5.9 15.3 18.0 59.0 2.0 Prudence 18.0 25.7 33.5 16.5 2.0 Superior 17.7 7.2 14.5 6.6 1.0 Large Aladdin 29.8 17.6 19.5 19.0 1.0 New Moon 36.7 23.3 6.6 7.0 1.0 Rascal 25.5 20.8 14.6 9.0 1.0 *Plot rating for powdery mildew; 1=little to none, 4 = completely infected