SEPAWA Nordic Update on disinfectants under the BPR. Michael Fink DHI, Denmark 16 th of May 2017

Similar documents
Update on the Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR) Formulators, importers and distributors of disinfection products

Status of the new Biocidal Products Regulation Impact on formulators of disinfection products

INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS POWERING YOUR SAFETY SUCCESS

PRODUCT REGISTRATION: AN E-GUIDE

Union Authorisation. Gosia Oledzka. A.I.S.E. Bratislava May Scientific and Technical Affairs Manager

CONSEQUENCES OF THE BPR

The Biocidal Products Regulation. Key Commission Issues & Next Steps

Bilateral screening: Chapter 27 PRESENTATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR)

Experience with Biocidal Product Family as competent authority

BPR in Brief. Guidance Document for A.I.S.E. members

An Overview on the New Biocidal Products Regulation: Asian-European Regulatory Summit Singapore 1st-2nd September, 2014

History and Scope of the Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR) -- And What Happens Next

Biocidal Product Families instead of Frame Formulations The right step forward? Sara Kirkham

Treated Articles and their regulation under the European Biocidal Products Regulation

A Practical Guide to Biocidal Products and Articles

Biocides IT training Helsinki - 27 September 2017 IUCLID 6

Formulated Biocidal Products Under the BPR

Relevant Biocidal Product Types in Food Contact Applications

The Impact of the BPR on the Automotive Supply Chain

BPR Requirements for Treated Articles. A.I.S.E. Biocides WG First revision - December 2017

Towards EU MRLs for biocides current status. Karin Mahieu

New missions for ANSES in the area of biocidal products

The Biocidal Products Regulation in the Automotive Supply Chain

IT tool training. Biocides Day. 25 th of October :30-11:15 IUCLID 11:30-13:00 SPC Editor 14:00-16:00 R4BP 3

Regulatory Compliance of Biocides in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry. Regulatory Requirement for North Sea Operations

Thought Starter. European Conference on MRL-Setting for Biocides

The New EU Rules on Articles Treated with Biocidal Products. Cándido García Molyneux European Food Law Conference 2014 ERA, Trier May 5, 2014

BIOCIDES NOVEMBER, VIENNA. Why attend? About this event. Who should attend? biocides2013

Biocides for Fuels & Lubricants Application and Regulations

CEPE guidance Labelling of Treated Articles

Appendix 1 fees for biocidal active substances and products. A. Fees for evaluation of applications* Active substances fees

Impact of the Biocidal Product Regulations. webinar, 26 March 2013, 2pm GMT

Flavourings Legislation and Safety Assessment

Biocides IT training Vienna - 4 December 2017 IUCLID 6

Ministry of the Environment Decree

The 8th Symposium focusing on Authorisation of Biocidal products and Active Substance Approval within the Biocidal Product Regulation

Biocidal Products Act 1

To: Technical Group, PWG ccfi: Executive Committee CFA/082/14

Treated Article or biocidal product - a small difference with huge consequences. Ulrike Frank

Forum Biocides November 2018 Dimitri Guillaume Attaché Biocides

PRODUCT SAFETY DATA SHEET

Overview IMPSC206. Manufacture toffee, tablet, fudge and fondant

European Biocidal Products Regulation

Control of treated articles in the Biocidal Products Regulation ECHA Biocides Stakeholders Day 25 June 2013

Biocidal Products Regulation

GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS SYSTEM IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Arrangement of regulations

Note for agreement with Competent Authorities for Biocidal Products

Ideas for group discussion / exercises - Section 3 Applying food hygiene principles to the coffee chain

Developments in the legislation on food hygiene related with VTEC Kris De Smet European Commission GD SANCO, Unit G4 Food, alert system and training

NEW ZEALAND WINE FOOD BILL ORAL SUBMISSION OF NEW ZEALAND WINEGROWERS 23 SEPTEMBER Introduction

Biocide Restrictions in the European Union

CEPE guidance note Labelling of Treated Articles revision 3. November 2016

Experience with CEPs, API manufacturer s perspective

The tricky rules for Treated Articles: Ulrike Frank

Improving Enquiry Point and Notification Authority Operations

Fedima Position Paper on Labelling of Allergens

LEAN PRODUCTION FOR WINERIES PROGRAM

European Union comments for the. CODEX COMMITTEE ON CONTAMINANTS IN FOOD (CCCF) 4th Session. Izmir, Turkey, April 2010.

Use of a CEP. CEP: What does it mean? Pascale Poukens-Renwart. Certification of Substances Department, EDQM

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX. on the traceability requirements for sprouts and seeds intended for the production of sprouts

UKRAINE Climate conditions and soil in Ukraine are suitable for growing nut trees.

NZQA registered unit standard version 1 Page 1 of 5

Flavour Legislation Past Present and Future or From the Stone Age to the Internet Age and Beyond. Joy Hardinge

UNIT TITLE: MANAGE AND OPERATE A COFFEE SHOP NOMINAL HOURS: 85

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL ENVIRONMENT Directorate A Green Economy ENV.A.3 - Chemicals

Sustainable Coffee Economy

Welcome to the Play it Safe campaign pack

donors forum: Project development/ funding AND Partnership Fair

Fairtrade Policy. Version 2.0

(Text with EEA relevance)

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQS)

WTO/TBT Monthly Notification Bulletin (July 2009)

INTRODUCTION. Arpal Group

HACCP SUCCESS 5 RULES FOR

KAFTA and JAETA Prospects for Queensland

Subject: Industry Standard for a HACCP Plan, HACCP Competency Requirements and HACCP Implementation

Fairtrade Finland Jatta Makkula 1

Response to Reports from the Acadian and Francophone Communities. October 2016

EuPIA guidance note Labelling of Treated Articles - revision 2

Medical Conditions Policy

Market, Regulatory & Policy Update for Plant-based Ingredients

Overview PPL2FBS3. Prepare and serve cocktails (mixology)

The European Fruit and Vegetable Sector

Roaster/Production Operative. Coffee for The People by The Coffee People. Our Values: The Role:

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

WTO principles and beer Alberto Volpato Counsellor for Agriculture & Health EU Delegation to the Russian Federation

Have your say. Acknowledgements

EuroBiocides. Final report. Published by the EuroBiocides, May Project management Annmette Søgård, Denmark

Allergy Awareness and Management Policy

COLEACP PIP PROGRAMME. Financed by the European Union

ROADSIDE STALL APPLICATION FORM TEMPLATE

2014 Street Vending Recommendations for By-law & Guideline Updates. Engineering Department, Street Use Division February 19, 2014

COMMITTEE ON COMMODITY PROBLEMS

HELLENIC MULTI ANNUAL CONTROL PROGRAMME FOR PESTICIDE RESIDUES

Globalization of Agriculture: An Ownership and Market Perspective. Ken Sullivan March 7, 2017

Identifying & Managing Allergen Risks in the Foodservice Sector

Customer Focused, Science Driven, Results Led

Overview. PPL2PC19 - SQA Unit Code HK Prepare, cook and finish basic pasta dishes

Wine and aromatised wine products annex to The self-regulatory proposal from the european alcoholic beverages sectors on the provision of nutrition

Transcription:

SEPAWA Nordic 2017 Update on disinfectants under the BPR Michael Fink DHI, Denmark 16 th of May 2017

DHI Environment and Toxicology (EAT) International consulting and research organisation within water, environment and health Support of industry and authorities in human and environmental risk assessments Chemicals and consumer products Biocides and pesticides Food, feed, cosmetics IT and chemical management Pharmaceuticals and medical devices Water safety and contaminants Marine waste and ballast water #2

Michael Fink Biologist, from 2008 at DHI-EAT Business Development Manager, biocides Danish/German Risk assessment of biocidal actives and products Strategic advice to industry Course leader: Authorisation of biocidal products #3

Hands on experience from numerous disinfectant projects Product authorisations PT 1-5 Union authorisation PT 1-5 Same product authorisations Mutual recognition authorisations Art. 95 registrations projects PT 1-5 In-situ generated biocides Simplified procedure disinfectants, wipes Notification of new active substances PT 1-5 Research projects, disinfectant spray products Tailor made IUCLID courses, authorisation courses #4

Agenda 1. The BPR and disinfectants 2. Status of the active substances of disinfectants 3. Options for formulators to defend their products 4. Consortia #5

01. The BPR and disinfectants #6

1. The BPR and disinfectants Main purpose of BPR Biocidal products are safe for humans, animals and the environment Biocidal products are sufficiently effective Harmonisation of rules concerning Making available of biocidal products on the market Use of biocidal products Evaluation of biocidal products #7

1. The BPR and some of its associated implementing acts Review Programme ECHA fee regulation BPR Same products regulation Annex I actives Changes regulation http://echa.europa.eu/regulations/biocidal-products-regulation/legislation #8

1. The BPR and disinfectants Approval process of biocidal products remains the same: The active substance (AS) sets the pace 1. Evaluation and approval of active substance(s) 2. Authorisation of biocidal product #9

1. The BPR and disinfectants Relevant product-types within the scope of the BPR Product-type 1: Human hygiene Product-type 2: Disinfectants and algaecides not intended for direct application to humans or animals Product-type 3: Veterinary hygiene Product-type 4: Food and feed area Product-type 5: Drinking water Product-type 6-13: Preservatives. #10

1. The BPR and disinfectants Large amount of unique biocidal products on the market (not only disinfectants!) Germany > 36.000 products registered France > 27.000 products registered Denmark > 2.000 products (300 registered) Netherlands > 1.500 products authorised (800 disinfectants) Huge variation of products (22 Product types) Disinfection products (PT1-5) the largest #11

1. The BPR and disinfectants France Courtesy of MEEDDM, 2009 #12

1. The BPR and disinfectants Many disinfectants are on the market in Germany Courtesy of BAuA, 2012 #13

1. The BPR and disinfectants Netherlands Courtesy of ctgb, 2016 #14

1. The BPR and disinfectants Complex regulation Guidelines being developed in parallel of deadlines for industry Used to having (relatively) easy market access Requirements of the BPR is a regulatory paradigm shift for industry within disinfection #15

02. Status of the active substances of disinfectants #16

2. Status of the active substances of disinfectants Priority list from the review programme 1062/2014 #17

2. Status of the active substances of disinfectants Courtesy of ECHA, CW, Barcelona, 2017 #18

2. Status of the active substances of disinfectants Courtesy of ECHA, CW, Barcelona, 2017 #19

2. Status of the active substances of disinfectants Selected actives PT/ Status Iodine PT1, PT3, PT4/ approved 1. Sep. 2015 Propan-2-ol PT 1, PT2, PT4/ approved 1. July 2016 Glutaraldehyde PT 2-4, PT6, PT11-12/ approved 1. Oct. 2016 Dates for productdeadline Hydrogen peroxide PT1-6/ approved 1. Feb. 2017 #20

2. Status of the active substances of disinfectants Selected actives PT/ Status C(M)IT/MIT PT2, PT4, PT6, PT11, PT13/ approved 1. July 2017 PHMB PT2, PT4/ approved 1. July 2017 Biphenyl-2-ol PT1-4, PT6, PT13/ approved 1. July 2017 PAA PT1-6/ approved 1. Oct. 2017 Ampholyt 20 PT2-4/ approved 1. January 2018 Citric acid PT2/ approved 1. March 2018 And more... Dates for productdeadline #21

2. Status of the active substances of disinfectants San Selected actives PAA in situ (TAED+percarbonate) PT/ Status PT2-4/ BPC opinion on approval Active chlorine released from chlorine Active chlorine released from sodium hypochlorite Active chlorine released from calcium hypochlorite (L)+ Lactic acid Propan-1-ol PT2, PT5/ BPC opinion on approval PT1-5/ BPC opinion on approval PT2-5/ BPC opinion on approval PT 1, PT 3, PT 4/ BPC opinion on approval PT1, PT2, PT4/ BPC opinion on approval Active chlorine in situ PT1-5/ on the table BPC Dec. 2017 Bardap 26 PT 4/ on the table BPC 2017 DDAC PT 3, PT 4/ on the table BPC 2017 Silver PT 4, PT 5/ on the table BPC 2017 Ethanol PT1, PT2, PT4/ on the table BPC 2018 #22 And many more to come

#23

#24

03. Options for formulators to defend their products #25

3. Options for formulators to defend their products General considerations: Have a strategy- and stick to it Stay or leave the market; exit strategy Explore active substance suppliers options, buy into their formulations Explore biocidal product family concept, non-complex products, room for many formulations Invest in own application/ dossier, full control Same biocidal products regulation, low IPR, private label Alone vs. work in consortia #26

3. Options for formulators to defend their products What needs to be invested in for a typical biocidal products authorsation: LOA, active substance(s) LOA, data on formulation Or own data on formulation, phys-chem, methods of analysis, efficacy Invest in resources to make the application, many different formats like IUCLID, PAR, SPC, R4BP Fees to ECHA, evaluating MS CA #27

3. Options for formulators to defend their products Option #1 AS supplier defends own formulations. Product formulator wants to be fully covered by AS suppliers authorisation. AS supplier Product formulator #28

3. Options for formulators to defend their products Option #1 AS supplier defends own formulations. Product formulator wants to be fully covered by AS suppliers authorisation. Pros No costs to LOA, AS No costs to data on formulation Cons AS suppliers name on label No control of product No investment in resources No fees to authorities #29

3. Options for formulators to defend their products Option #1 AS supplier or other entity defends a number of formulations. Product formulator wants to be partly covered by AS suppliers or other entities authorisation. AS supplier Product formulator #30

3. Options for formulators to defend their products Option #2 AS supplier or other entity defends a number of formulations. Product formulator wants to be partly covered by AS suppliers or other entities authorisation. Pros Little investment in resources Small fees to authorities < 3.000 EUR Own name on label Cons LOA to AS LOA to data on product No control of product #31

3. Options for formulators to defend their products Option #3 Product formulator defends own products with own authorisation- typically by exploring the biocidal products family concept. Product formulator #32

3. Options for formulators to defend their products Option #3 Product formulator defends own products with own authorisation- typically by exploring the biocidal products family concept. Pros Full control and ownership Cons Costs to LOA, AS Own name on label Costs to data on formulation Sell LOA on data to others Investment in resources Fees to authorities #33

04. Consortia #34

4. Consortia Option #4 Product formulators form consortia to defend own products with own separate authorisations- typically by exploring the biocidal products family concept paired with the same biocidal products concept. Core dossier BPF covering all products of product formulators Product formulator 1 Product formulator 2 Product formulator 3 Product formulator X #35

4. Consortia Share costs Data on product Resources Fees to authorities LOA, AS Legal help Beware of antitrust regulation #36

4. Consortia The Biocidal Products Regulation gives producers, importers and distributors of biocidal products the opportunity to obtain authorisations through voluntary cooperation/consortia The aim of joining a cooperation is to reduce costs related to authority fees, tests, technical work and legal assistance. The principle is simple: Sharing costs among many companies will reduce costs for the single company. The reduction is significant even when there are only few members in a cooperation. #37

4. Consortia In addition to the benefit of shared authorisation costs, joining a consortium gives you the opportunity to obtain authorisation of own products based on the principle of the biocidal product family concept and the same biocidal products regulation. This enables you to maintain individual product authorisations independently. The consortium is targeted producers, distributors and formulators placing biocidal products on the market. It will be of interest to small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) within biocidal products and biocidal product families #38

4. Consortia As member of a consortium, you are supported with: Setting up and facilitation of the consortium Communication with EU regulatory bodies and member state authorities Data gap analysis Detailed cost analysis study Testing strategy and tests Legal advice Exposure and risk assessment Dossier preparation and submission Post submission #39

4. Consortia Read more here: https://www.dhigroup.com/areas-of-expertise/productsafety-and-environmental-risk/chemicals-and-regulatorycompliance/biocide-consortium-call-of-interest #40

Summary BPR is a complex legislation posing high pressure on disinfection SMEs within the next years ECHA and MS have picked up speed in active substance evaluation- typical 2 year deadlines are kicking in for important disinfectant actives Different options for formulators to stay on the market- by exploring biocidal family concept, same biocidal product concept Exploring consortia concept #41

Thank you for your attention Michael Fink mif@dhigroup.com +45 4516 9156