Determination of natamycin in wines Résolution OIV-SCMA

Similar documents
RESOLUTION OIV-OENO ANALYSIS OF VOLATILE COMPOUNDS IN WINES BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY

Rapid Analysis of Soft Drinks Using the ACQUITY UPLC H-Class System with the Waters Beverage Analysis Kit

Analytical Method for Coumaphos (Targeted to agricultural, animal and fishery products)

Determination of Melamine Residue in Milk Powder and Egg Using Agilent SampliQ Polymer SCX Solid Phase Extraction and the Agilent 1200 Series HPLC/UV

Methanol (Resolution Oeno 377/2009, Revised by OIV-OENO 480/2014)

High Sensitivity Quantitation Method of Dicyandiamide and Melamine in Milk Powders by Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Extraction of Acrylamide from Coffee Using ISOLUTE. SLE+ Prior to LC-MS/MS Analysis

Application Note: Analysis of Melamine in Milk (updated: 04/17/09) Product: DPX-CX (1 ml or 5 ml) Page 1 of 5 INTRODUCTION

Determination of Caffeine in Coffee Products According to DIN 20481

Determination of Ochratoxin A in Roasted Coffee According to DIN EN 14132

Extraction of Multiple Mycotoxins From Animal Feed Using ISOLUTE Myco SPE Columns prior to LC-MS/MS Analysis

Ochratoxin A N H. N-{ [(3R)-5-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-oxo-3,4-dihydro-1H-isochromen-7-yl]carbon yl}- L-phenylalanine

Determination of Methylcafestol in Roasted Coffee Products According to DIN 10779

EXTRACTION OF SEDIMENTS FOR BUTYLTINS

The Determination of Pesticides in Wine

Determination of the concentration of caffeine, theobromine, and gallic acid in commercial tea samples

Higher Resolution Separation of Organic Acids and Common Inorganic Anions in Wine

PECTINASE Product Code: P129

! " # # $% 004/2009. SpeedExtractor E-916

three different household steam ovens, representing a number of identically constructed ovens (see attached list at the end of this document):

Validation Report: Total Sulfite Assay Kit (cat. no. K-TSULPH)

Vinmetrica s SC-50 MLF Analyzer: a Comparison of Methods for Measuring Malic Acid in Wines.

Royal Society of Chemistry Analytical Division East Anglia Region National Schools' Analyst Competition

EXTRACTION PROCEDURE

EXTRACTION OF SEDIMENTS FOR AROMATIC AND CHLORINATED HYDROCARBONS

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CAFFEINE PROFILE OF MATURE TEA LEAVES AND PROCESSED TEA MARKETED IN SONITPUR DISTRICT OF ASSAM, INDIA.

Application Note FP High Sensitivity Coumarin Analysis. Introduction. Keywords

AppNote 13/2012. Automated Solid Phase Extraction (SPE)-LC-MS/MS Method for the Determination of Acrylamide in Brewed Coffee Samples KEYWORDS ABSTRACT

Determination of Metals in Wort and Beer Samples using the Agilent 5110 ICP-OES

Bromine Containing Fumigants Determined as Total Inorganic Bromide

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2017, 9(9): Research Article

High-Resolution Sampling 2D-LC with the Agilent 1290 Infinity II 2D-LC Solution

Enhancing the Flexibility of the NGC Chromatography System: Addition of a Refractive Index Detector for Wine Sample Analysis

APPLICATIONS TN Fast and Robust Analysis of Organic Acids from Wine using HPLC-UV. Introduction. Results and Discussion. Materials and Methods

CHAPTER 8. Sample Laboratory Experiments

Validation Report: Free Sulfite Assay Kit (cat. no. K-FSULPH)

Practical 1 - Determination of Quinine in Tonic Water

RESOLUTION OIV-OENO MONOGRAPH ON GLUTATHIONE

TSKgel TECHNICAL INFORMATION SHEET No. 131

ASTM D6042 Calibration Mixture

Analysis of trace elements and major components in wine with the Thermo Scientific icap 7400 ICP-OES

Profiling of Aroma Components in Wine Using a Novel Hybrid GC/MS/MS System

RAPID, SPECIFIC ANALYSIS OF MELAMINE CONTAMINATION IN INFANT FORMULA AND LIQUID MILK BY UPLC/MS/MS

Speciated Arsenic Analysis in Wine Using HPLC-ICP-QQQ

Identification of Adulteration or origins of whisky and alcohol with the Electronic Nose

One class classification based authentication of peanut oils by fatty

ASSET EZ4-NCO Dry Sampler Extraction Procedure.

Correlation of the free amino nitrogen and nitrogen by O-phthaldialdehyde methods in the assay of beer

A Fast Method for Sugar Analysis of Instant Coffee Samples

An Overview of Official Methods of Analysis

Automation of AOAC for the Identification of FD&C Color Additives in Foods using Solid Phase Extraction

Analytical Report. Volatile Organic Compounds Profile by GC-MS in Cupcake Batter Flavor Concentrate

Estimation of Caffeine Concentration in Decaffeinated Coffee and Tea Available in Pakistan

Analysis of Beta-Carotene and Total Carotenoids from Pacific Sea Plasma (Spectrophotometric Method)

ALPHA. Innovation with Integrity. FT-IR Wine & Must Analyzer FT-IR

Determination of Pesticide Residues in Red Wine

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

Measuring tannins in grapes and red wine using the MCP (methyl cellulose precipitable tannin assay

Draft for comments only Not to be cited as East African Standard

Identification & Estimation of Melamine Residue in Powdered Milk by RP-HPLC

Comprehensive analysis of coffee bean extracts by GC GC TOF MS

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS. Methylxanthine content in commonly consumed foods in Spain and determination of its intake during consumption

EXPERIMENT 6. Molecular Fluorescence Spectroscopy: Quinine Assay

Analytical Report. Volatile Organic Compounds Profile by GC-MS in Clove E-liquid Flavor Concentrate. PO Box 2624 Woodinville, WA 98072

Rapid Tea Analysis on Poroshell 120 SB-C18 with LC/MS

Determination of Pesticides in Coffee with QuEChERS Extraction and Silica Gel SPE Cleanup

Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

Determination of Alcohol Content of Wine by Distillation followed by Density Determination by Hydrometry

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Oilseed residues Determination of oil content Part 2: Rapid extraction method

Application Note CL0311. Introduction

Fast Analysis of Smoke Taint Compounds in Wine with an Agilent J&W DB-HeavyWax GC Column

16th International CEEPUS Symposium and Summer School on Bioanalysis, Warsaw, Poland, July 06-12, 2016

General overview of the two stages of the QuEChERS technique. Stage 1: Sample extraction. Stage 2: Sample cleanup

HI Formol Number Mini Titrator for Wine and Fruit Juice Analysis

RESOLUTION OIV-OENO DETECTION OF CHITINASE AND THAUMATIN-LIKE PROTEINS IN WHITE WINES

Identification of reconstituted milk in pasteurized and UHT milk

[ application note note ] ]

Experiment 6 Thin-Layer Chromatography (TLC)

Detecting Melamine Adulteration in Milk Powder

Assessment of the CDR BeerLab Touch Analyser. March Report for: QuadraChem Laboratories Ltd. Campden BRI Group contracting company:

Disclosure to Promote the Right To Information

Somchai Rice 1, Jacek A. Koziel 1, Anne Fennell 2 1

Caffeine in Energy Drinks

Tyler Trent, SVOC Application Specialist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1

OenoFoss. Instant quality control throughout the winemaking process. Dedicated Analytical Solutions

Somchai Rice 1, Jacek A. Koziel 1, Jennie Savits 2,3, Murlidhar Dharmadhikari 2,3 1 Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University

Elemental Analysis of Yixing Tea Pots by Laser Excited Atomic. Fluorescence of Desorbed Plumes (PLEAF) Bruno Y. Cai * and N.H. Cheung Dec.

III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Analytical Report. Table 1: Target compound levels. Concentration units are ppm or N/D, not detected.

Determination of Coumarins in Cosmetics

Determination Of Saponin And Various Chemical Compounds In Camellia Sinensis And Genus Ilex.

DETERMINATION OF CHROMIUM IN MACEDONIAN WINE BY ELECTROTHERMAL ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY

RIDASCREEN Gliadin. Validation Report. R-Biopharm AG. Art.No. R7001

Profiling and Identification of Hop-Derived Bitter Compounds in Beer Using LC-MS/MS

AWRI Refrigeration Demand Calculator

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION

Application Note No. 193/2015

Acetic acid dissociates immediately in solution. Reaction A does not react further following the sample taken at the end of

Transcription:

Method OIV-MA-AS323-09 Type IV methods Résolution OIV-SCMA 461-2012 1. INTRODUCTION Different methods for the determination of natamycin are used based mainly on HPLC in combination with DAD or MS detection. Estimation of the performance limits - limit of detection and quantification - relies on the responsibility of the laboratories according to accreditation systems (e.g. ISO/EN 17025/2005) employing the recommendations of the OIV (OENO 7/2000, E-AS1-10-LIMDET) or other normative guidelines. As there is lack of a reliable interlaboratory estimate of the critical level, a decision limit of 5 µg/l is temporarily adopted until a reliable interlaboratory estimate or other robust indicators of the critical level can be obtained. 2. METHODS 2.1 Determination of natamycin (pimaricin) in wine by liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry 2.1.1 SCOPE This method describes an analytical procedure for the determination of natamycin (pimaricin) in wine. The level of natamycin is expressed in micrograms per litre (μg/l) of wine. In-house validation has been carried out using solvent solutions, red wine and white wine over the concentration range 5 2600 μg/l. 2.1.2 PRINCIPLE The level of natamycin in wine is determined by direct injection of the sample into a liquid chromatograph with a high-resolution massspectrometric detection system (LC-HR/MS). Quantification is achieved using the standard addition method. The sample is initially analysed to gain an estimated concentration of natamycin. The analysis is then repeated with standard addition calibration standards more suited to the concentration of natamycin in the sample. OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 1

2.1.3 REAGENTS 2.1.3.1 Analytes 2.1.3.1.1 Natamycin (Pimaricin) > 95% 2.1.3.2 Chemicals 2.1.3.2.1 Methanol, HPLC Fluorescence grade (CAS no. 67-56-1). 2.1.3.2.2 Purified water for laboratory use, for example of EN ISO 3696 grade (water for analytical laboratory use - specification and test methods [ISO 3696:1987]). 2.1.3.2.3 Acetic acid, 100%, (CAS no. 64-19-7) 2.1.3.3 Solutions 2.1.3.3.1 Stock solution of natamycin (1000 μg/ml) Weigh to the nearest 0.1 mg approximately 10 mg of natamycin (2.1.3.1.1) in a 10 ml amber volumetric flask and make up to the mark with methanol:water:acetic acid (2.1.3.3.4). Cap and sonicate. Calculate the actual concentration in micrograms of natamycin per millilitre of solution. 2.1.3.3.2 Working solution 1: natamycin (10 μg/ml) Pipette 100 μl of stock solution (2.1.3.3.1) into a amber 10 ml volumetric flask and make up to the mark with methanol:water:acetic acid (2.1.3.3.4) 2.1.3.3.3 Working solution 2: natamycin (0.5 μg/ml) Pipette 500 μl of working solution one (2.1.3.3.2) into an amber 10 ml volumetric flask and make up to the mark with methanol:water:acetic acid (2.1.3.3.4) OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 2

2.1.3.3.4 Solution of methanol:water:acetic acid (50:47:3, v/v) Using a measuring cylinder, measure 500 ml of methanol (3.2.1) into a 1 L volumetric flask. Add 470 ml water (2.1.3.2.2) and shake to mix. Add 30 ml acetic acid (2.1.3.2.3) and shake well. 2.1.3.3.5 Methanol, 3% acetic acid Using a measuring cylinder add 30 ml of acetic acid (2.1.3.2.3) to a 1 L volumetric flask. Make up to the mark with methanol (2.1.3.2.1) and shake well. 2.1.3.3.6 Water, 3% acetic acid Using a measuring cylinder add 30 ml of acetic acid (2.1.3.2.3) to a 1 L volumetric flask. Make up to the mark with water (2.1.3.2.2) and shake well. 2.1.4 APPARATUS NOTE: An instrument or item of apparatus is listed only where it is specialised or made to a particular specification, the usual laboratory glassware and equipment being assumed to be available. 2.1.4.1 Liquid Chromatograph (LC) Equipped with an automatic injector, a 100 µl injection loop and a high resolution mass spectrometer. 2.1.4.1.1 LC column Capable of obtaining reproducible natamycin peaks and capable of separating the natamycin peaks from interfering peaks originating from the sample matrix and/or the solvents used. NOTE: Depending on the type of equipment used for the analysis, the appropriate operating conditions should be optimised. OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 3

2.1.4.1.2 HPLC analysis The following column and parameters have been found to be suitable: Column: Waters Sunfire C18, 150 x 2.1 mm, 3.5 µm Column temperature: Flow rate: 30 o C 0.25 ml/min Injection volume: 20 µl Mobile phase A: Water:acetic acid, 97:3 (v/v) (2.1.3.3.6) Mobile phase B: Methanol:acetic acid, 97:3 (v/v) (2.1.3.3.5) Run time: Autosampler tray: 30 min 8 o C Gradient: Time (min) Mobile phase A (%) Mobile phase B (%) 0 90 10 25 10 90 27 10 90 27.1 90 10 30 90 10 OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 4

2.1.4.2 Mass spectrometric detection (LC-HR/MS) Ionisation mode: positive electrospray Mass resolution: m/z/ m/z AGC target: High dynamic range Max Inj time: 50 ms Scan range: m/z 480-670 Sweep gas: 60 L/min Aux gas: 5 L/min Spray voltage: 3.75 V Natamycin: m/z 666.31069 [M+H] +. confirmation ion m/z 503.22672 Retention time: 16.5 mins 2.1.5 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE Samples should be shaken to ensure homogeneity prior to sub-sampling. 2.1.5.1 Screening For each wine pipette 2 ml of sample into two 2 ml Eppendorf centrifuge vials. Add 0 µl, 20 µl and of natamycin working solution 2 at 0.5 μg/ml (2.1.3.3.3) to the vials respectively. This is equivalent to 0 μg/l and 5 μg/l natamycin added. Shake the vials for one minute and then centrifuge for 10 min at 14000 rpm. Filter an aliquot through 0.2 μm PTFE into an amber 2 ml vial. Analyse by LC- HR/MS (section 6) and estimate the concentration of natamycin in the sample (section 7). If the estimated concentration of natamycin is less than 5 μg/l report the data as < 5 μg/l. If the estimated concentration of natamycin is greater than 5 μg/l follow section 5.2. 2.1.5.2 Quantitation OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 5

Natamycin determination for samples with an estimated concentration of greater than 5 μg/l. Pipette 2 ml of wine into five 2 ml Eppendorf centrifuge vials and add 0 µl, 5 µl, 10 µl, 20 µl and 50 µl of natamycin working solution 1 (2.1.3.3.2) into the vials respectively. This is equivalent to 0 μg/l, 25 μg/l, 50 μg/l, 100 μg/l and 250 μg/l natamycin added. Shake the vials for one minute and then centrifuge for 10 min at 14000 rpm. Filter an aliquot through 0.2 μm PTFE into an amber 2 ml vial. Analyse by LC-HR/MS (section 6) and estimate the concentration of natamycin in the sample (section 7). 2.1.6 ANALYSIS NOTE: When starting measurements baseline stability and response linearity of the detector should be examined, together with verification of the detection limit. Maintain the same operating conditions throughout the measurement of all samples and calibration standards. Identify the natamycin peaks on the basis of the retention time and their accurate mass channel, and measure the peak areas. Inject each of the solutions as prepared onto the LC column. Measure the peak area of the natamycin peak in each of the quantification and confirmation channels. An example of a typical chromatogram is given in Figure 1. OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 6

Relative Abundance Relative Abundance COMPENDIUM OF INTERNATIONAL METHODS OF ANALYSIS - OIV Figure 1. Typical LC-HR/MS chromatogram and mass spectrum for natamycin spiked into white wine at the equivalent of 50 μg/l in the sample. C:\Xcalibur\...\data\10043_039 1/28/2010 4:12:34 AM white wine 100 rep 1 RT: 10.00-25.00 SM: 7B 100 80 60 RT: 16.04 MA: 497798 NL: 4.94E4 m/z= 666.30069-666.32069 MS 10043_039 40 20 0 100 80 60 12.76 15.49 17.79 RT: 16.05 AA: 261679 NL: 2.78E4 m/z= 503.21672-503.23672 MS ICIS 10043_039 40 20 0 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Time (min) 10043_039 #1976-2020 RT: 15.89-16.24 AV: 45 SB: 188 13.82-14.55, 16.88-17.64 NL: 2.22E4 T: FTMS {1,1} + p ESI Full ms [480.00-670.00] 100 666.3119 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 485.2170 489.0634 503.2275 495.2213 533.8832 521.9441 607.2148 648.3018 504.9311 537.9169 565.9105 512.9292 573.2158 587.2675 613.9032 527.9621 540.9152 605.1528 622.9182 651.3326 547.9008 555.2775 577.9591 629.3513 643.2388 661.4067 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620 630 640 650 660 670 m/z 668.3177 Plot the peak area for the main quantification channel against the concentration of natamycin added in micrograms per litre (μg/l). Determine the slope, intercept point and correlation coefficient of the regression line. The calibration curve shall be rectilinear and the correlation coefficient shall be 0.99 or better. 2.1.7 EXPRESSION OF RESULTS 2.1.7.1 Calculation of analyte level OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 7

The natamycin concentration in the sample in micrograms per litre (μg/l) is calclulated using the following formula: C = b/a where C = concentration of natamycin in the wine (μg/l), a = slope of the regression line, b = y-intercept point of the regression line 2.1.8 CONFIRMATION The presence of natamycin in the samples shall be confirmed by applying the following criteria: The presence of a peak in both accurate mass channels m/z 666.31069 and m/z 503.22672 at the same retention time. Calculate the ratio of the peak area for the main quantification mass channel relative to the peak area of the confirmation channel. The criterion is that the ratios agree to ± 25% of those obtained from the standard addition calibration standards. 2.1.9 METHOD PERFORMANCE DATA 2.1.9.1 Linearity The method is linear over the calibration range of 1 to 2640 μg/l in solvent, white wine and red wine matrices (figures 2, 3 and 4). OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 8

Figure 2. Ten point calibration graph of natamycin spiked into solvent in the range from 1 to 2600 μg/l. OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 9

Natamycin (µg/l) Table 1. Solvent calibration residuals. Predicted conc. (µg/l) Residual s Standard Residuals 0 6.4-6.4-0.4 1.056 6.8-5.7-0.3 5.28 10.9-5.6-0.3 10.56 16.8-6.3-0.4 52.8 58.9-6.1-0.3 105.6 108.3-2.7-0.2 211.2 200.1 11.1 0.6 1056 1029.8 26.2 1.5 2112 2084.8 27.2 1.6 2640 2671.8-31.8-1.8 Figure 3. Ten point calibration graph of natamycin spiked into white wine in the range from 1 to 2600 μg/l. OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 10

Table 2 White wine matrix calibration residuals. Natamycin (µg/l) Predicted conc. (µg/l) Residual s Standard Residuals 0 15.5-15.5-0.3 1.056 15.6-14.6-0.3 5.28 18.8-13.5-0.2 10.56 23.9-13.3-0.2 52.8 63.6-10.8-0.2 105.6 109.3-3.7-0.1 211.2 212.8-1.6 0.0 1056 989.0 67.0 1.2 2112 2003.2 108.8 2.0 2640 2742.7-102.7-1.8 Figure 4. Ten point Calibration graph of natamycin spiked into red wine in the range from 1 to 2600 μg/l. OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 11

Natamycin (µg/l) Table 3. Red wine matrix calibration residuals. Predicted conc. (µg/l) Residual s Standard Residuals 0 7.2-7.2-0.3 1.056 8.2-7.1-0.3 5.28 10.9-5.7-0.3 10.56 16.8-6.2-0.3 52.8 52.1 0.7 0.0 105.6 102.1 3.5 0.2 211.2 199.8 11.4 0.5 1056 1055.2 0.8 0.0 2112 2063.7 48.3 2.3 2640 2678.4-38.4-1.8 OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 12

2.1.9.2 Accuracy and Precision The method was assessed for repeatability at the interventiont limit of 5 μg/l and at 200 μg/l in solvent, white wine and red wine matrices (tables 4, 5 and 6). The accuracy was assessed by spiking a known amount at two different levels into white and red wine. The analysis was then performed by a second analyst without the knowledge of the spiked natamycin concentration. The results are shown in table 7. OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 13

Table 4. Repeatability of natamycin spiked into solvent (methanol:water:acetic acid, 50:47:3 v/v) at two concentrations; 5 and 200 μg/l. Conc. Natamycin Recovery ug/l (%) Solvent std at 5 ng/ml rep 1 5.3 99.7 Solvent std at 5 ng/ml rep 2 5.4 101.8 Solvent std at 5 ng/ml rep 3 5.8 108.6 Solvent std at 5 ng/ml rep 4 5.7 108.2 Solvent std at 5 ng/ml rep 5 5.8 109.0 Solvent std at 5 ng/ml rep 6 5.9 112.2 Solvent std at 5 ng/ml rep 7 5.7 108.4 Solvent std at 5 ng/ml rep 8 6.4 120.2 Average 5.8 108.5 Std deviation 0.3 6.2 RSD (%) 5.7 5.7 Solvent std at 200 ng/ml rep 1 238.3 112.9 Solvent std at 200 ng/ml rep 2 237.1 112.4 Solvent std at 200 ng/ml rep 3 231.5 109.7 Solvent std at 200 ng/ml rep 4 228.0 108.1 Solvent std at 200 ng/ml rep 5 244.0 115.7 Solvent std at 200 ng/ml rep 6 220.7 104.6 Solvent std at 200 ng/ml rep 7 229.4 108.7 Solvent std at 200 ng/ml rep 8 251.7 119.3 Average 235.1 111.4 Std deviation 9.8 4.7 RSD (%) 4.2 4.2 OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 14

Table 5. Repeatability of natamycin spiked into white wine at two concentrations; 5 and 200 μg/l. Conc. Natamycin Recovery ug/l (%) White wine 5.3 ng/ml rep 1 5.3 99.1 White wine 5.3 ng/ml rep 2 4.4 82.8 White wine 5.3 ng/ml rep 3 5.1 96.0 White wine 5.3 ng/ml rep 4 4.9 92.5 White wine 5.3 ng/ml rep 5 4.6 86.4 White wine 5.3 ng/ml rep 6 5.1 96.4 White wine 5.3 ng/ml rep 7 4.8 90.9 White wine 5.3 ng/ml rep 8 4.9 92.2 Average 4.9 92.0 Std deviation 0.3 5.4 RSD (%) 5.9 5.9 White wine 211 ng/ml rep 1 217.6 103.1 White wine 211 ng/ml rep 2 223.3 105.8 White wine 211 ng/ml rep 3 213.0 101.0 White wine 211 ng/ml rep 4 216.8 102.7 White wine 211 ng/ml rep 5 211.4 100.2 White wine 211 ng/ml rep 6 208.6 98.9 White wine 211 ng/ml rep 7 204.2 96.8 White wine 211 ng/ml rep 8 214.4 101.6 Average 213.7 101.3 Std deviation 5.8 2.8 RSD (%) 2.7 2.7 OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 15

Table 6. Repeatability of natamycin spiked into red wine at two concentrations; 5 and 200 μg/l. Conc. Natamycin Recovery ug/l (%) Red wine 5.3 ng/ml rep 1 5.3 99.7 Red wine 5.3 ng/ml rep 2 5.0 93.8 Red wine 5.3 ng/ml rep 3 3.8 72.5 Red wine 5.3 ng/ml rep 4 5.1 96.5 Red wine 5.3 ng/ml rep 5 5.0 95.0 Red wine 5.3 ng/ml rep 6 5.5 103.5 Red wine 5.3 ng/ml rep 7 4.3 80.9 Red wine 5.3 ng/ml rep 8 4.8 90.7 Average 4.9 91.6 Std deviation 0.5 10.2 RSD (%) 11.1 11.1 Red wine 211 ng/ml rep 1 183.9 87.1 Red wine 211 ng/ml rep 2 178.4 84.5 Red wine 211 ng/ml rep 3 181.1 85.8 Red wine 211 ng/ml rep 4 197.5 93.6 Red wine 211 ng/ml rep 5 178.2 84.5 Red wine 211 ng/ml rep 6 184.2 87.3 Red wine 211 ng/ml rep 7 181.2 85.9 Red wine 211 ng/ml rep 8 171.3 81.2 Average 182.0 86.2 Std deviation 7.5 3.6 RSD (%) 4.1 4.1 OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 16

Table 7. Accuracy of natamycin spiked into white and red wine at two concentrations; 125 and 220 μg/l. Theoretical Obtained concentration concentratio n Accuracy Z Score (µg/l) (µg/l) (%) White wine A rep 1 125 135 108 0.50 White wine A rep 2 125 142 114 0.85 White wine A rep 3 125 138 110 0.65 White wine B rep 1 220 230 105 0.28 White wine B rep 2 220 230 105 0.28 White wine B rep 3 220 239 109 0.54 Red wine A rep 1 220 213 97-0.20 Red wine A rep 2 220 234 106 0.40 Red wine A rep 3 220 223 101 0.09 Red wine B rep 1 125 129 103 0.20 Red wine B rep 2 125 129 103 0.20 Red wine B rep 3 125 120 96-0.25 Calculations Z scores calculated as: = (obtained concentration - theoretical concentration)/ target standard deviation Where: Target standard deviation = 0.16 x spiked concentration i.e according to Horwitz OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 17

2.2 Détermination of natamycin (pimaricin) in wine by HPLC/DAD 2.2.1 Scope This method describes an analytical procedure for the determination of natamycin (pimaricin) in wine by HPLC. The level of natamycin is expressed in micrograms per litre (μg/l) of wine. The described method has been laboratory validated taking into account the influence of the matrix wine (e.g. white wine or red wine). 2.2.2 Principle Non-sparkling wine samples are directly injected into the HPLC system. Sparkling wine samples are degased first by filtration or by using an ultrasonic bath. The analyte is separated from the matrix on a C8-column. The fraction window with the analyte is automatically transferred to a C18-column for further separation. Natamycin is detected at 304 nm and 319 nm. Additionally the DAD spectrum is used for identification. Quantification is done with reference to external standards. 2.2.3 Reagents and Material 2.2.3.1 Reagents 2.2.3.1.1 Water, deionised 2.2.3.1.2 Methanol, HPLC grade (CAS no. 67-56-1). 2.2.3.1.3 Formic acid, p. a. (CAS no. 64-18-6). 2.2.3.1.4 Acetic acid, p. a. (CAS no. 64-19-7). 2.2.3.1.5 Hydrochloric acid, p. a., 0,1 N (CAS no. 7647-01-0). 2.2.3.1.6 Matrix wine, natamycin not detectable 2.2.3.1.7 Natamycin, > 95 % (CAS no. 7681-93-8). OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 18

The purity is verified by photometric measurement at 291 nm, 304 nm and 319 nm of a natamycin solution in hydrochloric acid, 0,1 N against a blank of hydrochloric acid, 0,1 N: Reference data according to the literature Extinction (1 Gew.% Natamycin, 1 cm cell) 291 nm 304 nm 319 nm 758 1173 1070 Alternative: After dilution (e. g. dilution factor 20) the stock solution (2.1.3.3.1.) can also be used for the photometric measurement, e. g. pipette 1,0 ml stock solution into a 20 ml volumetric flask and fill up to the mark with hydrochloric acid, 0,1 N. Measure against a blank with the same composition of solvents as the diluted stock solution. 2.2.3.2 Preparation of the mobile phase 2.2.3.2.1 Solutions for the mobile phase: 2.2.3.2.1.1 5 ml acetic acid added to 2 l methanol 2.2.3.2.1.2 5 ml acetic acid added to 2 l deionised water 2.2.3.2.2 Eluent 1: methanol-acetic acid / deionised wateracetic acid (65 / 35) 2.2.3.2.3 Eluent 2: methanol-acetic acid / deionised water-acetic acid (80 / 20) 2.2.3.3 Preparation of the stock and standard solutions All solutions have a limited stability and have to be stored dark and cold in a refrigerator. The stock solution (2.1.3.3.1.1) has a shelf life up to several weeks but the concentration has to be checked shortly before usage (e.g. see alternative method, 2.2.3.1.7.). Dilution I ( 2.2.3.3.1.2) and II (2.2.3.3.1.3) and the standard solutions (2.2.3.3.2) have to be prepared daily. 2.2.3.3.1 Preparation of the stock solution and dilutions 2.2.3.3.1.1 Stock solution (approximately 100 mg/l) Weight in about 5 mg natamycin (3.1.7) and transfer with methanol into a 50 ml volumetric flask. Add 0,5 ml formic acid, make sure that all the natamycin is dissolved, temperate at 20 C and make up to the mark with methanol. OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 19

2.2.3.3.1.2 Dilution I (approximately 5 mg/l) Pipette 2,5 ml of the stock solution (2.1.3.3.1.1) into a 50 ml volumetric flask and make up to the mark with deionised water. 2.2.3.3.1.3 Dilution II (approximately 1 mg/l) Pipette 4 ml of Dilution I (2.2.3.3.1.2) into a 20 ml volumetric flask and make up to the mark with the matrix wine (2.2.3.1.6). 2.2.3.3.2 Preparation of the standard solutions For the standard solutions dilute Dilution II (2.2.3.3.1.3) to the desired concentrations with the matrix wine (2.2.3.1.6), e. g. 50 µl into a 10 ml volumetric flask equals 5 µg/l: Volumetric flask 10 ml 10 ml 10 ml 10 ml 10 ml 10 ml 10 ml Volume of Dilution II (µl) 50 100 200 400 500 1000 3700 Amount natamycin (µg/l) of 5 10 20 40 50 100 370 2.2.4 Apparatus Usual laboratory equipment, in particular the following: 2.2.4.1 HPLC-DAD apparatus with a 6 port HPLC valve and two isocratic pumps or a gradient pump to enable fractionation 2.2.4.2 HPLC-column RP-8 2.2.4.3 HPLC-column RP-18 2.2.4.4 Photometer 2.2.5 Sampling Non-sparkling wine samples are directly injected into the HPLC system. Sparkling wine samples are first degased by filtration or by using an ultrasonic bath. If samples need to be stored the storage conditions should be cold and dark. 2.2.6. Procedure 2.2.6.1. Operating conditions of HPLC The following columns and parameters have been found to be suitable: OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 20

Column 1: C 8-column (e.g. Select B 125*4mm/5µm endcapped, Merck) Mobile phase: Eluent 1 (2.2.3.2.2) at room temperature Flow rate: Column 2: Merck) 1 ml/min C 18-column (e.g. Lichrospher 125*4mm/5µm, Mobile phase: Eluent 2 (2.2.3.2.3) at 30 C Flow rate: 1 ml/min Injection volume: 500 µl UV-detection: 304 nm and 319 nm Fraction window: The position of the fraction window has to be checked prior to the following analysis (fig. 1). The range of the fraction window has to be set at 0,5 min. before and after the desired peak elutes from the C 8-column. Fig. 1 Column 1 Fig. 2 Column 2 Fraction window White wine spiked with natamycin (50 µg/l) 2.2.6.2 Identification/ Confirmation OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 21

Identification of peaks is done by the comparison of retention times between standards and samples for both measured wavelengths 304 nm and 319 nm. Using the chromatographic system and parameters of 2.2.6.1 the retention time for natamycin is approximately 12,9 min (fig. 2). The DAD spectrum is used for further confirmation of positive findings (fig. 3 and fig. 4). Fig. 4 DAD spectra of natamycin Fig. 3 3D-DAD spectra of natamycin 2.2.7. Calculation and expression of results A calibration curve of the standard solutions (2.2.3.3.2) is prepared using the chromatograms measured at 304 nm. The quantification of natamycin is performed following the external calibration method. A linear calibration curve is generated by comparison of the peak areas and the relevant concentrations. The correlation coefficient should be at least 0,99. The expression of the results is µg/l. 2.2.8. Method performance data Detection limit, Quantification limit OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 22

The detection limit and quantification limit were determined according to DIN 32645 (direct determination: multiple measurement of a blank matrix sample, n=10, and a calibration curve that covers the total working range). Detection limit: 2,5 µg/l Quantification limit: 8,5 µg/l Linearity The linearity in a wine matrix is confirmed in the calibration range of 5 µg/l to 100 μg/l (fig. 5). Fig. 5 Six point calibration graph of natamycin spiked into white wine matrix in the range from 5 to 100 μg/l, R 2 =0,9999 OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 23

2.2.9 Trueness and Precision Trueness and repeatability were assessed by spiking a known amount of natamycin into white, rosé and red wine and measuring each of these samples five times. The results are shown in table 1. Matrix White wine Rosé wine Red wine Red wine Natamycin content in matrix (µg/l) Spiked natamycin content (µg/l) n. d. 5.02 n. d. 5.02 n. d. 5.02 n. d. 21.2 Measured natamycin content (µg/l) Recovery rate (%) Z- Score 5.04 100.4 0.0 4.70 93.6-0.2 5.12 102.0 0.1 5.29 105.4 0.2 4.97 99.0 0.0 Average 5.02 100.1 Std dev. 0.22 RSD (%) 4.3 Repeatability r 0.85 4.79 95.4-0.1 4.83 96.2-0.1 4.76 94.8-0.1 4.79 95.4-0.1 4.73 94.2-0.2 Average 4.78 95.2 Std dev. 0.04 RSD (%) 0.78 Repeatability r 0.15 4.61 91.8-0.2 4.65 92.6-0.2 4.89 97.4-0.1 4.67 93.0-0.2 4.34 86.5-0.4 Average 4.63 92.3 Std dev. 0.20 RSD (%) 4.2 Repeatability r 0.77 19.73 93.1-0.2 20.66 97.5-0.1 21.16 99.8 0.0 19.73 93.1-0.2 OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 24

Red wine 19.58 92.4-0.3 Average 20.17 95.2 Std dev. 0.70 RSD (%) 3.5 Repeatability r 2.7 51.84 97.4-0.1 51.91 97.6-0.1 n.d. 53.2 51.42 96.7-0.1 50.12 94.2-0.2 50.62 95.2-0.2 Average 51.18 96.2 Std dev. 0.78 RSD (%) 1.5 Repeatability r 3.1 Table 1 Accuracy of natamycin spiked into white. rosé and red wine; n.d. not detected. detection limit 2.5 µg/l Calculations (Table 1): Repeatability r = Std dev. * t 4;0.95 * 2 1/2 Z score = (measured amount-spiked amount)/ target standard deviation * * according to Horwitz (1-0.5 log spiked amount) target standard deviation = 1/100 * spiked amount * 2 References DIN 32645:2008-11 UV- und IR-Spektren wichtiger pharmazeutischer Wirkstoffe. Editio Cantor Aulendorf. 1978. Herausgeber/ Editior Hans-Werner Dibbern in Zusammenarbeit mit E. Wirbitzki Macarthur R. Feinberg M. Bertheau Y. 2010. Construction of measurement uncertainty profiles for quantitative analysis of genetically modified organisms based on interlaboratory validation data. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 93(3). 1046 1056. FV 1351. Dominic Roberts and Adrian Charlton. Determination of natamycin in wine by liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry: standard operating procedure and method performance data. OIV SCMA March 2010. OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 25

FV 1355. Tomasz Brzezina. Natamycin in Wein. OIV SCMA March 2010. OIV-MA-AS323-09 : 2012 26