Introduction. Survey Results

Similar documents
Hops in Virginia 2014 Grower Survey

UPDATE ON COST OF PRODUCTION & MARKETING OPPORTUNITIES OF HOPS IN THE SOUTHEAST UTIA SYMPOSIUM ON HOPS AUGUST 15, 2018 KNOXVILLE

Market research. Hop production practices from hop producers. Market demand of hops: current and desired from brewers

Brewers Association 2019 Hop Industry Update Hop Survey Results Inventory and National Hop Report Federal Affairs


1) What proportion of the districts has written policies regarding vending or a la carte foods?

From Rhizome to Brewery

Imperial FFA Market Plan Team

HL/yr % HL/yr 0 0%

Results from the 2012 Berry Pricing Survey. Science Bldg., Ithaca, NY 14853

Kelli Stokely Masters of Agriculture candidate Department of Horticulture Oregon Wine Research Institute

Advancing Agriculture Grape Industry Development Program

Colorado State University Viticulture and Enology. Grapevine Cold Hardiness

Title: Western New York Sweet Corn Pheromone Trap Network Survey

VIN Introduction to Viticulture and Vineyard Establishment Student/Trainee Assessment Form

Hops. Hops What are hops? Alpha & Beta Acids 2/19/2014. Beth LaShell Fort Lewis College The Old Fort at Hesperus

2016 STATUS SUMMARY VINEYARDS AND WINERIES OF MINNESOTA

Grape Growers of Ontario Developing key measures to critically look at the grape and wine industry

Buying Filberts On a Sample Basis

MBA 503 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

2018 Vineyard Economics Survey

The supply and demand for oilseeds in South Africa

Feasibility of Small Farms Growing Hops & Specialty Grains Profitably in Howard County. Hobie Cohen, Nora Pittmann & Andrew Roehl

The Market for Northeastern Grown Hops 1

Coffee Eco-labeling: Profit, Prosperity, & Healthy Nature? Brian Crespi Andre Goncalves Janani Kannan Alexey Kudryavtsev Jessica Stern

How LWIN helped to transform operations at LCB Vinothèque

(A report prepared for Milk SA)

The University of Georgia

MICRONUTRIENT MAPPING IN IDAHO, WASHINGTON AND OREGONll

Global Perspectives Grant Program

2017 FINANCIAL REVIEW

Table of Contents. Toast Inc. 2

Hops Marketing Opportunities In Tennessee

Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless

Academic Year 2014/2015 Assessment Report. Bachelor of Science in Viticulture, Department of Viticulture and Enology

AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Oregon State College Uta. A. Schoenfeld, Director Corvallis. Circular of Information No.

Hop Farming in Ontario

Harvesting Charges for Florida Citrus, 2016/17

Acreage Forecast

2014 Organic Silage Corn Variety Trial for Coastal Humboldt County

NEEDS ASSESSMENT. Overview of Inputs Required for Apple Juice Production in Montezuma County

Using Standardized Recipes in Child Care

Fair Trade Campus Application Form

Title: Control of Wild Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in 'Jubilee' Sweet Corn in the Willamette Valley, 1987.

Dairy Market. Overview. Commercial Use of Dairy Products

Cost of Establishment and Operation Cold-Hardy Grapes in the Thousand Islands Region

JCAST. Department of Viticulture and Enology, B.S. in Viticulture

SITUATION AND OUTLOOK FOR COMMODITIES GREAT LAKES REGION, 2017 CROP YEAR GENERAL:

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching

Vineyard Cash Flows Tremain Hatch

Soft and Semi-soft Cheese made from Unpasteurized/Raw Milk in Canada Bureau of Microbial Hazards, Food Directorate, Health Canada

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BEER TOURISM IN KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

Retailing Frozen Foods

O P T IM IZ IN G H O P QUA LITY. Zac German Technical Manager z

Tremain Hatch Vineyard training & design

Spring & Winter Safflower as a Potential Crop South Plains Region, Texas

Valley Green Tea Wholesale Information for Retailers

BRD BREWERS RESOURCE DIRECTORY

Highlights Sector Policy for Tea

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

From Waste Stream To Protein! Closed Loop Mushroom Production on 100% Waste Stream Substrate

Missouri Specialty Crop Survey

2. What are the dates for the Afterschool Supper and Snack Program? The Supper and Snack Program will run from August 21, 2017 through June 6, 2018

Minnesota Grape Growers Profile 2007

Hamburger Pork Chop Deli Ham Chicken Wing $6.46 $4.95 $4.03 $3.50 $1.83 $1.93 $1.71 $2.78

Collaborators: Emelie Swackhammer, Horticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh/Northampton County

2011 Regional Wine Grape Marketing and Price Outlook

The Vietnam urban food consumption and expenditure study

Cocoa Prepared by Foresight October 3, 2018

2018 DCYF Summer Meal Program: Frequently Asked Questions for Potential Distribution Site

Oregon Wine Industry Sustainable Showcase. Gregory V. Jones

On the margins: Third Party Certification among Papua New Guinea smallholder coffee producers

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this lesson:

Food Act 1984 (Vic) Application to register food vending machines

RESTAURANT OUTLOOK SURVEY

HVG Report Hop market and new coming products Where is the World hop market heading? Carlos Ruiz

Seriously, CELIAC. talk.

Jeff Olsen OSU Extension Horticulturist

BRD BREWERS RESOURCE DIRECTORY

VENDOR PACKAGE

The Strategic Marketing Institute Working Paper

The Economic Contribution of the Colorado Wine Industry

Oregon s Other Tree Fruits & Nuts

Kidney Beans Value Chain and Export Capacity in the Kyrgyz Republic

Using Growing Degree Hours Accumulated Thirty Days after Bloom to Help Growers Predict Difficult Fruit Sizing Years

California Wine Vineyards CALASFMRA Land Values Survey

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

Ohio Grape-Wine Electronic Newsletter

HONDURAS. A Quick Scan on Improving the Economic Viability of Coffee Farming A QUICK SCAN ON IMPROVING THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF COFFEE FARMING

CERTIFIED SUSTAINABLE ANNUAL REPORT 2017

Washington Wine Commission: Wine industry grows its research commitment

Trends. in retail. Issue 8 Winter The Evolution of on-demand Food and Beverage Delivery Options. Content

An Overview of the U.S. Bell Pepper Industry. Trina Biswas, Zhengfei Guan, 1 Feng Wu University of Florida

California Wine Community Sustainability Report Chapter 12 SOLID WASTE REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT

2018 Annual Conference Agenda and Schedule Friday February 9 - Saturday February 10

Biological Control of the Mexican Bean Beetle Epilachna varivestis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) Using the Parasitic Wasp Pediobius foveolatus

LIVE Wines Backgrounder Certified Sustainable Northwest Wines

Figure 1: Percentage of Pennsylvania Wine Trail 2011 Pennsylvania Wine Industry Needs Assessment Survey

The Weights and Measures (Specified Quantities) (Unwrapped Bread and Intoxicating Liquor) Order 2011

Transcription:

2014 Virginia Hops Grower Survey - Scope of the Industry Laura Siegle, Agriculture and Natural Resources Agent, Amelia County, Virginia Cooperative Extension Holly Scoggins, Associate Professor, Department of Horticulture, Virginia Tech Stan Driver and Devon Kistler, Old Dominion Hops Cooperative Introduction Hops (Humulus lupulus) are an essential component of beer production. Though hops have been grown in Virginia since the 1700 s, Virginia hops production has been relatively insignificant until the past decade. Most major hops production in the U.S. takes place in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho. However, in recent years, the number of craft breweries in Virginia has increased and interest in local hops production appears to have grown. The number of requests from current and potential growers seeking information and resources from Virginia Cooperative Extension has also increased steadily. Unfortunately, prior to 2014, no means was available to formally assess the scope of the industry, and national hop acreage reports did not provide data for Virginia. Survey Process We developed and distributed a survey in to Virginia hop growers in September of 2014 to evaluate the status of the industry and provide a benchmark for future growth assessments. The survey was developed with Qualtrics online survey software and administered on behalf of Virginia Cooperative Extension. The survey was marketed and distributed as widely as possible through email lists, grower groups, county agents, and social media. Industry stakeholders also assisted with distribution. Therefore, exact survey distribution and thus response rate (%) is not known. Statewide yield and total plant numbers may be higher than shown in this survey in the event that a grower chose not to complete the survey or if a grower was unknown to the survey administrators. Though national reports include hops acreage, we chose instead to assess the total number of plants on Virginia operations. Unlike hops producers in states like Washington, many Virginia growers have hop yards of less than one acre, and trellis spacing is not standardized. For these reasons, we believed that it would be difficult to get a highly accurate acreage estimate. Instead, we asked growers to report varieties grown, number of plants for each variety, and maturity of each set of plants in years. It should also be noted that yield was reported as wet pounds harvested since most growers use this benchmark in recordkeeping and few Virginia growers dried and weighed their hops in 2014. Survey Results Our results indicate most hop plants in Virginia are three years old or less. This correlates with our observations that the state experienced a rapid increase in the number of growers in 2012 and 2013, while a handful of growers have been in existence for a longer period of time. Although not all growers reported yields, the yields that were provided were consistent with expectations for new yards with young plants. Hop plants do not produce heavily until they reach three or more years in the field. As the maturity of each hop yard increases, yields are expected to increase. Interestingly, twenty-four out of forty-six respondents indicated plans to expand their operations for the 2015 growing season. Though several hop varieties were reported as in production, Cascade was far and away the most widely grown. Detailed survey results are reported as follows, as well as information on University/VCE resources and services. 1 Hops in Virginia Scope of the Industry Survey

Hops in Virginia Scope of the Industry Survey Administered September, 2014 1. Number of respondents to survey: 46 2. Respondent s level of involvement in hops growing: Grower Classification Percent of Respondents Matching Criteria I am growing hops commercially/i intend to sell my hops 48% I am currently growing hops for my personal use/for noncommercial 24% purposes I am not yet growing hops, but planning on it 24% Other 4% 3. Respondent s number of years experience growing hops: 12 Years Growing Hops 10 8 6 Number of Respondents 4 2 0 Not yet growing 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 or more years Other 2 Hops in Virginia Scope of the Industry Survey

4. Growers were asked to complete a yield table for 2014, including variety grown, number of crowns of each variety and the plant s maturity (years), and harvest/yield expressed as pounds of wet hops. - Hop varieties grown as reported by respondents: Galena Centennial Willamette Chinook 4% Nugget 6% Hop Varieties Grown in Virginia Magnum CTZ 8% *Other 9% Cascade 65% Total number of plants reported: 13,317 *Other: Seventeen other varieties were grown in small numbers, often by only one survey respondent. To protect privacy of yield data for these individuals, any variety with fewer than 50 plants in the state OR any variety that was grown by one respondent was lumped into one total in this "other" category. This category also includes data from growers who reported plant but did not specify varieties or data by variety. - Harvest Yield Data 2014 Yield Data Variety Pounds Harvested (Wet) Cascade 5667 Chinook 210 CTZ 187 Nugget 129 Willamette 10 Centennial 4 Galena 0 Magnum 0 *Other 1902 **Total Yield 8109 Pounds (Wet) * *Other: Seventeen other varieties were grown in small numbers, often by only one survey respondent. To protect privacy of yield data for these individuals, any variety with fewer than 50 plants in the state OR any variety that was grown by one respondent was lumped into one total in this "other" category. This category also includes data from growers who reported plants but did not specify varieties or data by variety. **Some growers were unable to report harvest data with their plant and variety totals. The figure represents the values that were provided. 3 Hops in Virginia Scope of the Industry Survey

5. Form that harvested hops were sold in: Of the 8,109 pounds harvested, 65% was sold wet. 11% was sold dried, and 10% was sold pelletized. For the remaining 14%, hops were not sold or the grower did not indicate the form in which they were sold. 6. Commercial growers were asked if they were able to sell all of their 2014 crops-should this be crop?, and if not, why: Eleven respondents reported that they were able to sell their entire 2014 crop. Ten respondents reported they were unable to sell their entire 2014 crop. The following reasons were noted: - Hops did not produce enough to sell - Too many wet hops were ready at one time - No buyer was available - Grower lacked time, resources, and/or knowledge to market crop - Demand - Holding hops for later sale 7. Growers were asked if they plan to expand in 2015 and if so, estimate the additional number of crowns: Twenty-four growers reported plans to expand in 2015 and provided estimates indicating a collective increase of 7,760 to over 8,000 plants to the existing total. 8. Growers were asked to describe their personal perception of current demand and future growth of the Virginia-grown hops market: Industry Outlook Ratings Strong Good Fair Weak Current demand for Virginia-grown hops Future growth of the Virginiagrown hops market 0 5 10 15 20 25 Number of Respondents 4 Hops in Virginia Scope of the Industry Survey

9. Growers were asked to describe how they marketed their crop in 2014. Their responses are broadly categorized and summarized below: Number of Growers Using this Method Marketing Method 7 Meetings with brewers 4 Emails 4 Phone calls 3 Word of mouth 2 Social media 2 Brewer visits to hop yard 1 Outreach to brewing clubs Several respondents noted they were farm breweries or home brewers who used their own hops and therefore did not need to market them. 10. Growers were asked to explain their greatest challenges growing hops. Because many comments echoed one another, they were categorized and summarized: Number of Growers Challenge Summaries of Comments from Growers Noting this Challenge 9 Time Not as much available time as desired for chores 9 Marketing Product quality, coordinating delivery of wet hops with brewer, demand from buyers 8 Labor Particularly challenging during spring chores and harvest; also costly 8 Harvest efficiency Labor and time-intensive, even when mechanized 5 Cost Most challenging cost appears to be yard establishment 5 Weeds 4 Disease Some worried about downy mildew 3 Insects Several specifically mentioned Japanese beetles 3 Lack of industry & university resources Local information not readily available; difficulty finding plant material 3 Beginning grower "learning curve" Some noted that getting started and learning to manage hops was a challenge of its own 2 Pesticide selection Uncertainty about products labeled for use on hops; no VA hops pest management guide available 2 Rhizome Certain growers experienced rhizome failure establishment 1 Fertilizer Grower still learning and adjusting to plant needs 1 Irrigation 1 Processing after harvest Processing equipment/facility would be helpful for drying, pelletizing 5 Hops in Virginia Scope of the Industry Survey

11. Growers were provided with an opportunity to share successes, experiences, and outlook gained from 2014. Many comments were similar, so grower responses were interpreted and summarized below: Marketing - Local potential for growing and selling hops seems good. - Demand for Virginia hops seems strong. - Consumers are interested and excited about locally-grown hops. - Hops may not be profitable if demand is low and/or buyers can get them cheaper elsewhere. - Current cost per pound of wet hops is too high for most brewers. Brewers may be able to attain an acceptable margin if cost of wet hops decreased to $10 or less per pound. - Influx of breweries is increasing demand; brewers want fresh hops; brewers are interested in local hops. - Competition between growers and lack of brewer willingness to use wet hops could negatively affect demand and outlook. - Hops may not be profitable if demand is low and/or buyers can get them cheaper elsewhere. - Some brewers have already locked up local suppliers and first-time grower had difficulty finding outlet. Market development/assistance from grower group could mitigate this. Cultural practices (including resources) - Relationships with cooperatives, fellow growers, and farming neighbors are valuable. - Several growers are pleased with Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University involvement in the industry. - Several growers are re-evaluating variety selection in light of 2014 performance. Cascade remains popular. Harvest and post-harvest considerations - Having the capability to dry and/or pelletize hops in the future would be helpful. - Mechanized harvest is a necessity in the future, especially for larger yards. - Several growers were very pleased with 2014 harvest and look forward to adding new plants and/or varieties Brewer interactions - Connecting with brewers could be a challenge for some. - Only a handful of brewers released a local hopped beer this season. - Brewers are becoming acclimated to the considerations needed when working with Virginia growers and wet hops. - Only a handful of growers released a local hopped beer this season. 12. Growers were provided with an opportunity to describe any university and industry resources that they wish to see developed in the future: Number of Growers Requested Resource Requesting Resource 4 Shared harvesting equipment 4 Pest Management Guide 3 Hop breeding and research program 2 Hops production/management guide 2 Packing/drying facilities and services 1 Post-harvest handling guidelines 6 Hops in Virginia Scope of the Industry Survey

1 Faculty specializing in hops 1 Local rhizome source 1 Product approval system 1 Method to inform/educate VA brewers about VA hops 1 Great accessibility and feasibility concerning patented varieties 1 Tissue testing service 1 Outlets for developing and marketing alternative uses for hops Additional resources and services available for Virginia hop growers: Hops analysis service: The VT Enology Lab started offering hops acids and moisture analysis in July of 2014. Although other regional labs are doing similar analyses, the methods used only report total Alpha and total Beta acids. The lab offers those same methods, along with quantification of the acid components cohumulone/humulone, colupulone/lupulone. This method allows them to charge ~15% less than other labs with results available the same day samples are received. Aside from serving the industry at the stakeholder's request, the purpose of the service is to gather information about hops grown in the state. As time and interest grows, the lab will offer the complete suite of hops analysis including total essential oils and essential oil analysis. Contact your county Extension agent for the testing flyer, or email the lab directly for instructions: hops@vt.edu Virginia Tech Soil Testing: There is now a crop code for hops at the soil testing lab, code 75. Soil sample results and the accompanying recommendations will account for the research-based nutrient requirements of hops. County Extension agents can provide the box and form that must be used to submit the sample. Disease ID, weed ID, and insect ID: Your county Extension agent can assist with identification of these items and management recommendations. Agents also teach pesticide safety and certify private pesticide applicators, so agents can provide guidance for safely and responsibly selecting, storing, and apply pest control tools. 7 Hops in Virginia Scope of the Industry Survey