Barley Research at Aberdeen. Gongshe Hu USDA-ARS Aberdeen, Idaho

Similar documents
Malting Barley Development at OSU. Scott Fisk Cascadia Grains Conference January 12, 2013

Breeding Better Barley

GROWING MALTING BARLEY IN NY. M. Stanyard

Virginia Tech. Research and development of winter malt barley varieties for the eastern US

CMBTC 2017 Crop MALTING BARLEY QUALITY ASSESSMENT Preliminary Report

2013 Crop AAC Synergy Pilot Malting and Brewing Trials

2014 Crop Merit 57 Pilot Malting and Brewing Trials

Great Lakes Hop & Barley Conference Barley Contributions to Beer Flavor: Flavor Fields and The Oregon Promise

Evaluation of the Malting and Brewing Performance of the New Malting Variety CDC Meredith

Professional Analytical Services Catalogue

2012 Crop CDC Meredith Malting and Brewing Trials

Evaluation of the Malting and Brewing Performance of the New Canadian Malting Barley Variety Norman

Evaluation of the Malting and Brewing Performance the new Canadian Two Row Variety Cerveza

Malting and Brewing Trials with 2011 Crop Barley Samples of CDC PolarStar and AC Metcalfe


2012 Crop CDC Kindersley Malting & Brewing Trials

Pilot Malting and Brewing Trials with 2011 Crop CDC Meredith Barley

Evaluation of Malting Barley Potential for Atlantic Canada. Prepared for the Atlantic Grains Council December, 2013

CMBTC 2015 MALTING BARLEY CROP QUALITY ASSESSMENT Preliminary Report

PNWHBC 2017 Barley varieties and your home brew

Developing Markets for Heritage Malts. Chris Ridout John Innes Centre

40 TH Barley Improvement Conference. Hacienda Hotel, San Diego, California January 11-12, 2015

BMBRI/AIP Two Row Malting Barley Improvement at AAFC. Dr. Bill Legge & Dr. Ana Badea Brandon Research and Development Centre, Brandon, MB

Quality of New Canadian Malting Barley Varieties

Identifying Spring Malting Barley Varieties for the Craft Brewing Industries 2017 Final Report

Grain Craft. Thresher Seed Days Fort Hall, ID

2-ROW MALTING BARLEY 2017 SEED GUIDE

Colored Malt Products June 23, 2012 Robert Seggewiss 3/07/2012 1

Technology: What is in the Sorghum Pipeline

Rich Horsley Department of Plant Sciences North Dakota State University

2010 Analysis of the U.S. Non-GMO Food Soybean Variety Pipeline. Seth L. Naeve, James H. Orf, and Jill Miller-Garvin University of Minnesota

A complex data set: 7 malt parameters x 3 locations x 3 nitrogen rates x 5 varieties x 2 labs = 210 possible combinations

Randy Nelson Ram Singh

Effects of feeding brown midrib dwarf. performance and enteric methane. pearl millet silage on lactational. emission in dairy cows

Big Data and the Productivity Challenge for Wine Grapes. Nick Dokoozlian Agricultural Outlook Forum February

Quality of western Canadian malting barley 2010

WHEAT FLOUR OCEANIA IMPEX AUSTRALIA PTY LTD. Oceania Impex Australia Pty Ltd

Malt Specifications for the Practical Brewer. Ashton Lewis Technical Sales Manager Central Midwest

Confectionary sunflower A new breeding program. Sun Yue (Jenny)

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Research Progress towards Mechanical Harvest of New Mexico Pod-type Green Chile

Key Management Practices for Successful Malt Barley Production. Joel Ransom, Extension Agronomist for Cereal Crops

Where in the Genome is the Flax b1 Locus?

Barley Breeding Institute. South Africa. Barley Breeding Institute. South African. Barley Breeding Institute

DANISH MALTING BARLEY. Catalogue 2018

HARD RED SPRING WHEAT

Mapping and Detection of Downy Mildew and Botrytis bunch rot Resistance Loci in Norton-based Population

Jonathan H. Crane, Tropical Fruit Crop Specialist and Wanda Montas, Sr. Biologist

Spring Barley Variety Screening Donald R. Clark, Jim E. Smith, and Greg Chilcote 1

Faba Bean. Uses of Faba Bean

An Overview of New Crop Quality Of CWRS, CPSR & CWRW

BIOCHEMICAL PROCESSES BY MASHING AND CHARACTERIZATION OF THE FERMENTATION OF FEED BARLEY DURING BREWING

Developing Machine-Harvestable Fresh Market Tomatoes; and other Highlights from the UF Breeding Program

Blame the Maltster. John Mallett National Homebrewers Conference

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

NORSKØL. Norwegian malt, hops and herbs- the taste of Norwegian beer Northern Cereal, Orkney 2015 v. Mette Goul Thomsen

Handbook on Drying, Milling and Production of Cereal Foods (Wheat, Rice, Corn, Oat, Barley and Sorghum Processing Technology)2nd Revised Edition

Viking Malt Barley News Crop 2017

Supplementation of Beverages, Salad Dressing and Yogurt with Pulse Ingredients. Summary of Report

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

GO EST Agency

Discrimination of Ruiru 11 Hybrid Sibs based on Raw Coffee Quality

Determination of Fruit Sampling Location for Quality Measurements in Melon (Cucumis melo L.)

Response of malting barley cultivars to increasing nitrogen rates in western Canada

Survey Overview. SRW States and Areas Surveyed. U.S. Wheat Class Production Areas. East Coast States. Gulf Port States

SCREENING OF BARLEY CULTIVARS FOR POTENTIAL ETHANOL PRODUCTION IN MARYLAND FINAL GRANT REPORT

Preliminary observation on a spontaneous tricotyledonous mutant in sunflower

Blackberry Growth Cycle and New Varieties from the University of Arkansas. Alejandra A. Salgado and John R. Clark March 13 th, 2015 Virginia

Winter Barley Cultivar Trial Report: Caroline Wise, Masoud Hashemi and Talia Aronson

Western Regional Dry Pea, Lentil and Chickpea Trials

Global barley marketing issues. John Stuart 25 February 2013

Corn Quality for Alkaline Cooking: Analytical Challenges

Quality of Western Canadian malting barley

Accomplishments of a. 10 Year Initiative. to Develop Host Plant Resistance to Root Knot and Reniform Nematodes in Cotton

Evaluation of Insect-Protected and Noninsect-Protected Supersweet Sweet Corn Cultivars for West Virginia 2014

2015 Hard Red Wheat / Hard White Wheat. Crop Quality Report

Fruit and berry breeding and breedingrelated. research at SLU Hilde Nybom

PD Resistant Winegrapes Nearing Release

Variety Development and Implications for Australian Wheat Classes. Dr Bertus Jacobs LongReach Plant Breeders AGIC Asia 1 March 2016

Resistance to Phomopsis Stem Canker in Cultivated Sunflower 2011 Field Trials

American Malting Barley Association, Inc.

Quality of western Canadian wheat exports 2010

Differences in virulence of Phytophthora capsici isolates from a worldwide collection on tomato fruits

Primocane Fruiting Blackberry Trial Results

Blackberry Variety Development and Crop Growing Systems. John R. Clark University Professor of Horticulture

SoyBase, the USDA-ARS Soybean Genetics and Genomics Database

GRAIN SORGHUM. Tifton, Georgia: Early-Planted Grain Sorghum Hybrid Performance, 2012 Nonirrigated. 2-Year Average Yield

Wheat Quality Attributes and their Implications. Ashok Sarkar Senior Advisor, Technology Canadian International Grains Institute

What's New with Blackberry Varieties

Passionate about malt for over 90 years. Meet your specific requirements

THE NEW LITHUANIAN WINTER WHEAT VARIETIES

US Barley Acreage Million Acres

AN OVERVIEW OF THE BREWING PROCESS. Jared Long Head Brewer Altitude Chophouse and Brewery

The Science of Mashing. Jamie Ramshaw M Brew IBD 25/10/17

Introduction to the use of molecular genotyping techniques

1

2017 U.S. Pulse Quality Survey

Hard Red Wheat 2010 Hard White Wheat 2010

Unintended OverAttenuation from Dry. Hopping Beers. A Presentation of Brewery and Academic Research

AVOCADO GENETICS AND BREEDING PRESENT AND FUTURE

Transcription:

Barley Research at Aberdeen Gongshe Hu USDA-ARS Aberdeen, Idaho

USDA-ARS Research Facilities at Aberdeen

Overview of Malting Barley Research at Aberdeen The genetic program: beta-glucan and malting quality. The breeding program: 1. Scale: 10000-12000 plots/year. 2. Malting barley vs. food barley: 80% to 20% 3. 2-row vs. 6-row: 80% to 20% 4. Spring vs. winter: 60% to 40%

Barley Breeding Nurseries Ashton- 1598m Tetonia-1764m Idaho Falls-1380m Aberdeen- 1338m Soda Springs-1764m Filer-1064m grangeville-973m Grangeville Ashton Idaho Falls Tetonia Aberdeen Soda Springs Filer

Objectives of Barley Research at Aberdeen Genetic Research: To Identify genetic materials and DNA markers with for better qualities of barley improvements. Breeding program: To develop the best cultivars of winter and spring barley: Good quality high yield.

Identification and characterization of Barley Low BG mutant Mutant of M351 derived from chemical mutagenized Harrington cultivar A Genotype BG (%) M351 1.5% Harrington 5.1 Wild-type M351 B Wild-type M351

Table 1. Grain chemical compositions of M351 mutant and the corresponding wildtype plants Components Wild-type M351 P value Moisture % 8.4 8.4 0.3534 Protein % 18.3 17.4 0.2931 Starch % 61.1 62.0 0.6860 Oil % 2.3 2.4 0.1218 MLG % 5.1 1.5 <0.001** Amylose % 21.0 20.2 0.3052 Crude Fiber % 3.5 5.7 <0.001** Soluble Glucose % 0.09 0.09 1.0000 Fructans % 1.1 2.1 <0.001** Ash % 2.3 2.3 0.3235

Table 2. Physical characteristics of M351 and the wild-type grains from 2009. Material 100 Kernel hardness index (HI) 100 Kernel weight(g) Grain broken rate in threshing Wild-type 61.20 65.80 4.8 4.5 0.5% 0.6% M351 mutant 44.80 52.30 4.7 5.1 2.4% 2.6%

Pilot scale malting test (Malteurop North America, Inc) Crop Year 2011 Variety 2011 METCALF 2011 MERIT M351 Test weight 37.98 36.80 36.64 On 7 81.4 82.6 71.8 On 6 15.6 15.6 26.4 On 5 3.0 1.8 1.8 Thru 0.0 0.0 0.0 FG dry 83.1 83.8 82.8 CG dry 83.1 83.7 82.0 Wort ph 5.83 5.83 5.67 Viscosity 1.41 1.43 1.39 DP 155 147 129 Alpha-amylase 62.2 60.1 61.5 Total protein db 10.6 9.8 11.1 Soluble protein 5.75 5.58 5.39 S / T 54.2 56.9 48.6 Beta-glucan 61 80 69 FAN 235 232 205

M351 and Its Near isogenic wildtype lines in malting and fermentation Genotype Grain beta-glucan Beta-glucan in Wort(ppm) M351 1.5% 69 Wildtype 5.1% 251 Conclusions from the Bio-ethanol fermentation Experiment (National Corn-to-Ethanol Research Center) : The mash of the wild type barley had a much higher viscosity than the mutant. After liquefaction, the wild-type was the thickest and visually different than the mutant.

DNA markers available to track the mutant gene in M351 7H Bmag564 M351/CslF6 Bmag369 DArT marker bpb-8051 bpb-1039 bpb-8117 bpb-1050 bpb-2920 bpb-5599 bpb-4692 bpb-4623 bpb-9753 bpb-8956 bpb-2097 bpb-1770 bpb-2379 bpb-7437 bpb-7603 bpb-2188 bpb-1476 cdna AA cdna AA 32-52 105-125 134-154 2566 2586 ATC GGA TCC GCC GTG GCC TTC I G S A V A F ATC GGA TCC ACC GTG GCC TTC I G S T V A F Wildtype M351 1 947 N C Cellulose Synthase domain 118 919 710-730 742-760 779-799 833-853 859-881 896-916 849A-T in M351

Using a SNP functional marker of M351 to track the allele M351F1 G/A M351F1 M351R1 CTTCGCCAAGGTTCTCGAC AGGGGTAGAGGTGGAAGAGC M351R1

QTL mapping for the malting quality traits Population of 01Ab8219 x Stellar: 6-row. F5:7 families: 175 Years: 2009, 2010 Locations: Tetonia, Aberdeen Kernel on Barley Malt Wort Wort Barley Wort S/T DP Alphaamylasglucan (ppm) Beta FAN Weight 6/64 Color Extract Color Clarity Protein Protein (%) ( ASBC) (mg) (%) (Agtron) (%) (%) (%) (20 DU) (ppm) 38.7 94.8 71.1 82.9 2.3 1.0 10.4 5.2 52.1 120.5 97.1 151.9 207.3 37.9 98.2 77.9 80.4 2.2 1.3 11.8 5.0 44.8 151.7 71.1 103.3 192.4 Yellow colored values=01ab8219; White colored values = Stellar

QTLs FOR Malting Quality Traits 0.0 4.9 5.3 3H B_2018 B_4022-3H B_4472-3H B_3179-3H B_5555-3H Protein, Wort Protein, and FAM AB 0.0 6.8 8.3 11.0 11.7 28.0 31.0 60.3 65.3 79.4 81.3 85.5 86.2 87.4 90.9 91.3 92.1 1H 2572-986 5555-438 B_9552-1H B_6065-1H ABC00875-1-3-43 4393-1078 677-411 4978-1030 10360-563 4625-1413 4005-530 B_7949-1H B_8983-1H B-5584-1H B_9611-1H B_1922-1H B_5292-1H 409-1643 2314-1412 2151-1310 6238-243 B_2087-1H/5H B_8662-1H B_1586-1H B_5672-1H B_1535-1H B_1398-1H 596-1035 3751-1136 1906-429 4226-570 B_0851-1H B_0760-1H B_9288-1H B_0301-1H B_9415-1H 0.0 1.5 1.9 3.4 3.7 6.1 7.6 9.1 10.6 25.0 25.7 28.7 0.0 17.9 22.5 22.9 25.2 2H ~100 cm B_4293 B_7557-2H B_5519-2H B_7024-2H B_4704-2H B_0615-2H B_5688-2H 3453-1974 B_7445 B_3186-2H B_8399-2H 12224-363 B_6128-2H 12100-378 791-1113 8787-1459 7747-1056 B_5326 B_4877-2H 864-594 1283-332 B_3023 1486-908 ConsensusGBS037 ABC01791-1-1-11 9291-1322 3271-1422 9701-925 3108-232 8817-798 B_9458-2H Alpha Amylase TE Kernel wt. AB/TE 0.0 4.4 14.7 18.4 21.6 0.0 5.3 8.1 8.8 10.0 17.3 30.9 32.4 36.7 37.1 38.6 42.4 45.1 46.6 54.7 ~140 cm 4H B_5568 10982-896 B_6631-3H ConsensusGBS003 13750-348 B_3899-3H B_8030 7772-223 4270-184 5692-310 6519-812 3652-872 41-695 3282-555 299-163 1241-1649 B_1509 7550-562 4919-1051 2574-410 4133-601 4986-1214 B_7719-4H B_3739-4H B_6096-4H B_8701-4H 3704-1947 8653-475 9149-1316 3416-692 424-423 5273-894 ABC09662-1-3-35 4139-888 B_6145 bpt-6067-4h B_8896-4H

Kernel wt. TE 0.0 0.7 4.3 5.8 8.1 10.8 19.4 24.3 26.9 28.1 28.8 29.9 30.7 Malt ext. AB/TE Protein AB/TE DP TE Protein AB, S/T AB, FAN AB, AA TE 31.8 33.0 36.2 38.1 40.0 47.4 53.1 55.0 61.5 0.0 11.0 16.9 5H ~70c M ABC14689-1-9-39 3056-1317 2947-1245 5440-455 11944-542 3685-894 6833-658 ABC06144-pHv86-11931-389 264-571 ABC10441-1-4-20 65-778 4234-1944 7839-633 2906-1177 ABC11529-1-1-29 ABC07010-1-2-15 1910-1343 1732-491 3218-1094 1215-862 8852-318 5565-1908 8201-86 8631-469 4166-1090 4930-1604 9766-787 152-329 1286-990 5850-2347 ABC10705-1-1-26 7276-942 3012-1125 4517-217 7681-229 5732-1104 9100-978 4977-567 421-528 3997-796 B_6183-5H 6184-200 4753-1091 ABC17471-1-3-78 B_9896-6H 552-188 585-342 ConsensusGBS039 B_2006-5H B_1420-5H B_9733 B_4318-5H B_4970-5H Protein AB/TE Malt ext., Protein, w_ protein, and DP AB/TE FAN AB/TE 0.0 3.9 6.2 9.6 11.5 12.7 14.6 16.5 17.2 18.3 19.1 20.2 21.7 22.7 23.5 25.4 26.2 28.1 29.1 47.7 50.7 51.8 54.1 55.2 55.9 59.9 61.9 64.7 67.9 72.3 0.0 1.2 1.9 6H ~65c M 5684-601 8504-785 578-587 4641-266 2968-1066 ABC06682-1-1-31 9251-852 1899-739 2607-2929 ABC10265-sfp25-3147-440 2294-573 5656-1012 ABC14687-1-4-34 3436-354 ABC13717-1-1-32 4235-1617 1565-514 2026-302 3348-395 ConsensusGBS036 8048-952 8220-1223 4313-482 11016-603 1490-959 4721-1335 ABC04676-1-1-59 4258-1498 3378-619 ABC08769-1-1-20 4070-386 ABC04725-1-1-25 B_6023-6H B_0922 B_0481-6H B_9841-6H B_6990-6H B_3141-6H 5448-298 B_9807-6H B_2058-6H B_8170 B_5211 2188-425 1628-410 B_9749-6H B_8278 B_9840 B_6669 B_7467-6H B_9651-6H B_0572-6H B_4778-6H B_5498-6H B_3433-6H 5993-2383 4547-1677 B_3070 B_0403-6H B_2137-6H B_2304-6H B_1621-6H B_7146-6H 5074-1135 B_2863-6H FAN AB Protein AB/TE 0.0 0.8 1.1 1.9 2.6 5.3 23.2 24.0 52.2 55.0 60.4 64.8 65.9 67.0 68.6 73.0 78.3 113.9 115.1 115.8 119.1 123.8 124.6 125.3 126.9 127.6 128.7 129.5 133.9 139.9 7H B_5935-7H B_6054 B_2595-7H B_7769-7H B_8043-7H B_7863-7H 6394-944 4503-246 4275-1288 1511-545 B_8939-7H B_0678-7H B_2533-7H B_5074-7H B_5732 B_5852-7H B_8140 B_6156-7H B_3589-7H B_8568-7H ABC04803-1-1-39 B_8051-7H B_9457-7H 7712-674 5138-265 6290-574 9347-437 2462-971 4589-131 11619-618 3140-491 B_4441-7H B_7517-7H B_7583 B_3703-7H B_1591-7H 977-1377 B_6301 B_4856-7H B_3419-7H B_0182-7H B_8867-2H 7H 7397-854 7216-297 6628-1302 13008-352 B_8778-7H B_2328-7H B_6166-7H B_5923-7H B_0917-7H B_1645 B_0889-7H 4991-1028 8758-564 7180-778

Cultivars Released recently in the Breeding Program Winter barley malt cultivars: Charles (2006). Endeavor (2009) Both cultivars have been planted in Idaho for more than 10000 Acres Spring malt Cultivars: Sublette (2006) Spring food barley cultivars: Tetonia (2009) Julie (2012)

Charles Winter barley Cultivar Cultivar Grain yield Bu/Acre Extract Charles (2-row) 161 81.3 Eight-Twelve (Feed) 178 88AB536-B (6-row) 147 68.9

Endeavor Winter Barley Cultivar Cultivar Grain Yield (Bu/A irrigated) Height (cm) BG (g/kg) DP Endeavor 145.8 90.5 170 137* Charles 145.0 81.5 193 119 88AB536-B 134.0 97.3 Endeavor has better winter hardiness than Charles

Sublette Spring Malting Cultivar Cultivar Grain Yield (Bu/A. In 40 yearlocations) % Plump Kernel AA BG (ppm) Sublette 121.9 95 62 255 144 Harrington 117.3 85 68 407 108 Merit 124.7 88 52 201 159 DP

Elite Lines of 2-row winter Barley Name Year/ locations Mean Yield (Bu/A) Yield mean% Extract% DP AA Endeavor 27 129.6 99.3 78.5 125.5 101.2 Charles 24 135.0 100.0 79.6 132.9 93.7 Maja 14 145.6 99.8 78.4 124.9 43.9 02Ab339 22 144.7 110.5 80.4 131.0 97.6 02Ab431 22 145.7 109.1 80.9 141.2 86.8 02Ab170 22 140.8 107.3 79.9 106.3 100.2 02Ab597 20 147.2 111.0 80.9 103.9 78.2 02Ab948 22 137.7 104.9 80.2 119.2 90.1 02Ab641 17 135.4 109.6 81.5 107.2 94.8 02Ab669 24 147.8 109.5 81.7 111.0 104.7 02Ab348 22 140.8 107.2 81.2 92.9 97.1 02Ab671 22 142.3 108.4 80.8 94.4 96.2 02Ab712 22 142.2 108.4 81.4 116.8 104.3 02Ab710 22 139.1 106.0 81.4 126.5 53.3 4Ab08-X03W044-11 7 163.0 116.9 76.8 104.7 82.4 4Ab08-X03W044-9 7 143.9 103.2 78.8 98.7 96.1

Winter Hardiness Screening in Soda Spring Line Barley Type %Spring Stand 02Ab170 2-M 85/100/90 4Ab08-X03W044-11 6-M 95/100/100 02Ab645 2-M 100/95/40 02Ab339 2-M 100/95/60 02Ab710 2-M 100/70/85 4Ab08-X03W044-9 6-M 100/98/95 2Ab09-X05W048-100HL 2-Food 100/95/90 2Ab09-X05W048-85 2-Food 100/85/95 2Ab09-X05W048-318HL 2-Food 100/70/80 2Ab09-X05W049HL-15 2-Food 100/95/90 Schuyler 6-F 100/100/100 Charles 2-M 80/80/75 Endeavor 2-M 95/95/90 8-12 6-F 95/95/90 Finess 2-F 100/85/85 SunStar pride 6-F 100/98/95 Lewjain (WW) Winter wheat 98/98/95

Winter hardiness of the lines in pilot test (Soda Spring) Genotype Yield (2011-2012 dryland) Spring Stand% (Soda Spring) 02Ab431 71 85/80/60 02Ab671 72 100/85/100 02Ab669 75 95/80/85 Charles 76 80/80/75 Endeavor 80 95/90/95

Malting barley lines in the UI extension Winter Nursery (Aberdeen and Rupert) Cultivar Type Average Yield (Bu/A) Spring Stand (% AB/Rupert) Alba 6-M 180 98/95 93Ab669 6-M 178 98/88 02Ab431 2-M 163 97/95 OR92 6-M 171 97/98 OR91 6-M 172 99/94 02Ab671 2-M 148 96/90 Maja 6-M 154 97/98 Charles 2-M 149 98/95 Endeavor 2-M 162 96/98 OR818 6-M 145 95/99 Mathias 6-M 128 98/98

Winter Hardiness Screening in 2012-2013 To repeat the screening process on our elite materials. To expand to some materials from germplasm collections. To look for an additional nursery location in Idaho Falls area.

Elite Spring barley Lines 02Ab17271 (Spring 2-row): Under plant scale Evaluation. 02Ab04-X01084-27 (Spring 2- row): Passed the 2nd year of pilot scale evaluation 01AB9663 (Spring 6-row): Passed the 2 nd year of pilot test.

Yield Potential of the Spring Elite lines Variety or Selection Yield (% of control) (Yr/location) Kernel Weight (mg) on 6/64" (%) Malt Extract (%) 2Ab04-X01084-27 108.8 (39) 43.2 98.4 82.5 02Ab17271 105.7 (52) 44.8 97.2 83.5 CDC Copeland 100.5 (10) 46.0 99.2 82.4 M69 99.6 (30) 42.4 96.7 81.7 HARRINGTON 100.0 (52) 39.3 96.4 82.6 6-row 01Ab9663 122.5 (44) 39.9 98.1 82.7 Tradition 118.3 (46) 37.3 98.5 80.3 Morex 100.0 (44) 37.3 97.9 83.0

Summary for the Aberdeen Barley Program Genetic research provided good materials and markers for better barley cultivar development. Breeding program developed barley cultivars used in production. Winter malting lines with better winter hardiness and yield potential developed and are under pilot scale tests.

Future studies Look for molecular marker-assistant selection in special traits. Focus on 2-row malting barley for better malting quality and high yield. Enhance the winter malting barley cultivars: focusing on better winter hardiness and malting quality. Look for new technologies for speed up the winter cultivar development such as DH.

AMBA Acknowledgements Idaho Barley Commission Collaborators: BARI, Eric Jackson, Emir Islamovic, Pat Hayes, Juliet Marshal, USDA-ARS, Madison, WI. Cooperator Growers: Dave Bodine, Evan Hayes, Clark Kauffman, Craig Ozburn, Sid Cellan Genetics/Breeding program Gongshe Hu Chris Evans Kathy Satterfield Sherry Ellberg Natalie Klassen