Technical Memorandum: Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition

Similar documents
McDONALD'S AS A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITY

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BEER TOURISM IN KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN

The Economic Impact of Wine and Grapes in Lodi 2009

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OVERALL, WE FOUND THAT:

Sportzfun.com. Source: Joseph Pine and James Gilmore, The Experience Economy, Harvard Business School Press.

The Economic Impact of the Craft Brewing Industry in Maine. School of Economics Staff Paper SOE 630- February Andrew Crawley*^ and Sarah Welsh

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF WINE AND WINE GRAPES ON THE STATE OF TEXAS 2015

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE WINE AND GRAPE INDUSTRY IN CANADA 2015

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF WINE AND VINEYARDS IN NAPA COUNTY

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF MODEL WINERIES IN TEXAS. Industry Report

The 2006 Economic Impact of Nebraska Wineries and Grape Growers

Economic and Fiscal Impacts of LiftFund:

ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE FLORIDA CITRUS INDUSTRY IN

2016 STATUS SUMMARY VINEYARDS AND WINERIES OF MINNESOTA

Economic Contributions of the Florida Citrus Industry in and for Reduced Production

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF LEGALIZING RETAIL ALCOHOL SALES IN BENTON COUNTY. Produced for: Keep Dollars in Benton County

ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF WINE TOURISM IN MICHIGAN

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS FISCAL NOTE. HOUSE BILL NO. 466 PRINTERS NO. 521 PRIME SPONSOR: Turzai

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF WINE AND WINE GRAPES ON THE STATE OF VIRGINIA 2015

How Rest Area Commercialization Will Devastate the Economic Contributions of Interstate Businesses. Acknowledgements

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NORTH CAROLINA WINE AND WINE GRAPES 2013

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NORTH CAROLINA WINE AND WINE GRAPES 2016

2017 FINANCIAL REVIEW

THE NORTHEAST OHIO GRAPE & WINE ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY

The Economic Contribution of the Colorado Wine Industry

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF INDIANA WINE AND WINE GRAPES 2016

rom Texas Vineyards to the Final Consumer: n Economic Impact Analysis

Perceptions of Privatization

YAKIMA VALLEY TOURISM ANNUAL REPORT

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF NEW JERSEY WINE AND VINEYARDS 2016

The University of Georgia

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF CRAFT BREWERIES IN SAN DIEGO

WE DELIVER A Comprehensive Economic Impact Study of the U.S. Foodservice Distribution Industry.

The Economic Impact of Grapes, Grape Juice and Wine on the New York Economy, 2008 Prepared for the New York Wine and Grape Foundation

RESTAURANT OUTLOOK SURVEY

Peet's Coffee & Tea, Inc. Reports 62% Increase in Second Quarter 2008 Diluted Earnings Per Share

HONDURAS. A Quick Scan on Improving the Economic Viability of Coffee Farming A QUICK SCAN ON IMPROVING THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF COFFEE FARMING

An Examination of operating costs within a state s restaurant industry

Integrated Service Industry I : Accommodation and Food Service Activities

Results from the First North Carolina Wine Industry Tracker Survey

STATE OF THE INDUSTRY economic impact & consumer insights Christian Miller Proprietor, Full Glass Research

The Economic Impact of Napa County s Wine and Grapes, 2016

$ BUY STARBUCKS CORPORATION (SBUX) Rena Kaufman. Valuation Methodology. Market Data. Financial Summary (7/1/2018) Profile. Financial Analysis

A Presentation of the Primary Research on Visitation to Wine Festivals and Wineries in British Columbia

Submission to the Marlborough District Council Annual Plan 2016/2017

A Comparison of X, Y, and Boomer Generation Wine Consumers in California

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF INDUSTRY AND COMPANY

Re: Winery-Vineyard Economic Impacts

SUPPLEMENTARY SUBMISSION FROM THE SCOTTISH BEER AND PUB ASSOCIATION

Economic Contribution of Vineyards and Wineries of the North, 2015

Sonoma County Restaurant Week Report 2012 S O N O M A C O U N T Y

Volumetric Assessment of. the Foodservice. Potato Market. Prepared for. Project #17624 Add-on project # December 31, Technomic Inc.

OPPORTUNITIES FOR SRI LANKAN VIRGIN COCONUT OIL IN TURKEY

Grape Growers of Ontario Developing key measures to critically look at the grape and wine industry

Rail Haverhill Viability Study

Foodservice EUROPE. 10 countries analyzed: AUSTRIA BELGIUM FRANCE GERMANY ITALY NETHERLANDS PORTUGAL SPAIN SWITZERLAND UK

FACTORS DETERMINING UNITED STATES IMPORTS OF COFFEE

OKANAGAN VALLEY WINE CONSUMER RESEARCH STUDY 2008 RESULTS

1) What proportion of the districts has written policies regarding vending or a la carte foods?

CHAPTER I BACKGROUND

Telling an impactful story with data

Labor Supply of Married Couples in the Formal and Informal Sectors in Thailand

Fiscal and Economic Impacts of Beverage Excise Taxes Imposed by Maine Public Law 629

TOURIST SPECIAL INTEREST WINE TOURISM NEW ZEALAND FEBRUARY 2014

Annika Stensson. Director Research Communications National Restaurant Association Washington, D.C. Restaurant.org/Research.

SURVEY OF LICENSED PREMISES IN IRELAND 2009

The Contribution made by Beer to the European Economy. Czech Republic - January 2016

ETHIOPIA. A Quick Scan on Improving the Economic Viability of Coffee Farming A QUICK SCAN ON IMPROVING THE ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF COFFEE FARMING

Community differences in availability of prepared, readyto-eat foods in U.S. food stores

New from Packaged Facts!

VR-Business Partnership Profile

Wines of British Columbia Liberal Party of Canada s Pacific Caucus (July 19, 2016)

2010 International Visitation to North Carolina

The Contribution made by Beer to the European Economy. Poland - January 2016

SONOMA COUNTY RESTAURANT WEEK REPORT INDUSTRY REPORT

Informing Wineries Tourism Decisions: Studies of Tasting Room Visitors and Wine Tourism Collaboration

FAO IGG Meeting, Delhi, India May 2010

Perspective of the Labor Market for security guards in Israel in time of terror attacks

Uniform Rules Update Final EIR APPENDIX 6 ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS USED FOR ESTIMATING TRAFFIC VOLUMES

A Web Survey Analysis of the Subjective Well-being of Spanish Workers

2015/16 Harvesting Charges for Florida Citrus: Picking, Roadsiding and Hauling

Commercial Crawfish Fishing in the Gulf of Mexico States

QUALITY, PRICING AND THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WHEAT INDUSTRY IN SOUTH AFRICA

RESEARCH UPDATE from Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute by Natalia Kolyesnikova, PhD Tim Dodd, PhD THANK YOU SPONSORS

Preliminary unaudited financial results for the full year ended 30 June Amount for this reporting period

Starbucks BRAZIL. Presentation Outline

Recent U.S. Trade Patterns (2000-9) PP542. World Trade 1929 versus U.S. Top Trading Partners (Nov 2009) Why Do Countries Trade?

Summary Report Survey on Community Perceptions of Wine Businesses

Occupational Structure and Social Stratification in East Asia: A Comparative Study of Japan, Korea and Taiwan

Healthy Food Access Policy JOHN WEIDMAN THE FOOD TRUST

PENNSYLVANIA & TAVERN ASSOCIATION LICENSED BEVERAGE

Preview. Introduction. Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model

RESPONSE AND PROJECTED OPERATING STATEMENT

REMARKS BY PAUL BULCKE, GROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NESTLÉ S.A. MEDIA CONFERENCE, NAIROBI, FRIDAY, JULY 2, 2010

Economic Contribution of the Australian Wine Sector

FINA Pre-Budget 2018 Consultation Submission. A Solution to Advance the Canadian Value-Added Wine Sector

Please see Section IX. for Additional Information:

SMALLHOLDER TEA FARMING AND VALUE CHAIN DEVELOPMENT IN CHINA

The Economics Surrounding Premium Wine Production

UK Dining. Sourcing Report. Fiscal Year Contributors: Lilian Brislen Scott Smith

Transcription:

Technical Memorandum: Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition Prepared for: The Franklin Institute Science Museum Prepared by: Urban Partners November 2007 Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition Page 1

Introduction Urban Partners was retained by the Franklin Institute Science Museum to independently assess the economic impact of the Museum s Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition, which was on view to the public from February 3, 2007, to September 30, 2007. This technical memorandum underscores the very significant economic impact of this special exhibition on the cultural and economic vitality of the region, providing a direct benefit to the public, the City of Philadelphia, and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. During the exhibition s eight month run, the King Tut exhibit drew more than 1,300,000 visitors, who came from all across the United States, Puerto Rico, and at least 13 foreign countries on five continents. Approximately 15% of visitors were residents of Philadelphia; the remaining 85% were visitors who traveled from outside the City to experience the King Tut exhibition. Visitors directly motivated to come to Philadelphia because of the King Tut exhibition brought new dollars into the regional economy, generating and enhancing activity in the hotel, restaurant, transportation, and retail industries, as well as at other local cultural attractions. King Tut exhibition-motivated visitors utilized approximately 99,700 room nights during the exhibition. The benefit to the Philadelphia region is reflected in the total economic activity calculated at a minimum of $127.0 million. This estimate conservatively includes out-of-museum spending only for those visitors who came to Philadelphia specifically to see King Tut; it is possible and, indeed, probable, that many visitors who came to Philadelphia for other reasons extended their stay in Philadelphia in order to visit King Tut increasing total economic activity beyond the $127.0 million. This activity resulted in the creation of 1,995 full-time equivalent jobs with nearly $52 million in salary and wages, and in the $11.7 million in tax revenues generated for the City and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition Page 2

Summary of Impacts The King Tut exhibition hosted by the Franklin Institute Science Museum generated extremely significant economic impact within the Philadelphia region. This analysis of economic impact focuses on three factors: 1) the overall spending impact generated as a result of the exhibition; 2) employment generated by this activity; and 3) tax benefits received by the City of Philadelphia and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as a result of the exhibition. The King Tut exhibition: Attracted approximately 1,300,000 visitors, including 790,000 general audience visitors who live outside Philadelphia and came to the City specifically to see King Tut Motivated more than 540,000 visits to other area cultural attractions by individuals who came to Philadelphia specifically to see King Tut: 160,000 visits to the Independence National Historical Park 135,000 visits to the Philadelphia Museum of Art & the Rodin Museum 42,000 visits to the Academy of Natural Sciences 40,000 visits to the National Constitution Center 24,000 visits to the Please Touch Museum 17,000 visits to the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts, and 125,000 visits to other area attractions and performances. Generated total economic impact of $127.0 million within the Philadelphia region, produced by the activities of the Franklin Institute, the in-facility spending of all King Tut visitors, and the out-of-museum spending of those visitors who came to Philadelphia specifically to see King Tut: total direct economic impact of $67.9 million total indirect economic impact of $59.1 million Created, directly or indirectly, 1,995 full-time equivalent jobs of which: 1,715 positions are estimated to be located within Philadelphia 1,195 are estimated to be held by City residents Produced a total local and state tax benefit of $11.71 million: $5.876 million in tax revenue for the City of Philadelphia $5.835 million in tax revenue for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Generated the booking of approximately 99,700 hotel room nights in Philadelphia by individuals coming specifically to see King Tut: average rate of $134 per room night average length of stay of 1.8 days and average size of hotel party of 3.7 persons Motivated 54,000 additional overnight visitors who came to Philadelphia specifically to see King Tut and stayed with friends and family in Philadelphia and the region. Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition Page 3

Economic Impact The overall economic impact (spending impact) of the King Tut exhibition is derived from several interrelated components: the direct organizational economic impact of the Franklin Institute and its partners, especially that portion of economic activity occurring in the Philadelphia region and elsewhere in Pennsylvania; and the significant spending of visitors to the exhibition, in the Franklin Institute itself and elsewhere in the City as a direct result of their visit to King Tut. These two components of economic activity constitute the direct economic impact of the King Tut exhibition. An important third impact the indirect economic activity stimulated by this direct spending can also be traced through the regional economy. The total direct and indirect economic impact of the King Tut exhibition is $127.0 million (see Table 1). Table 1 Economic Impact of King Tut Exhibition for Philadelphia Region (All Estimates In Millions) Direct Economic Impact Organizational Economic Impact $11.7 Audience Spending (Outside Venue) $56.2 Total Direct Economic Impact In Region $67.9 Indirect Economic Impact Indirect Impact of Organizational Expenditures $10.8 Indirect Impact of Audience Spending (Outside Venue) $48.3 Total Indirect Economic Impact $59.1 Total Economic Impact $127.0 Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition Page 4

Direct Economic Impact This analysis was informed greatly by the significant audience survey completed during the King Tut exhibition. The Franklin Institute conducted nearly 1,100 on-site surveys to obtain information about King Tut visitors spending habits at the Franklin Institute and elsewhere in Philadelphia and the region. Urban Partners has analyzed available information to identify various categories of King Tut exhibition visitors and determine the typical spending characteristics of each category. These spending characteristics have been applied to the estimated number of visitors to the exhibition from each category, using self-identifying geographic data provided by survey participants and the Franklin Institute s ticket sales tracking system. King Tut drew a wide range of visitors to the Franklin Institute and to Philadelphia. The incremental economic impact of a specific visitor on the Philadelphia and Pennsylvania economy varies depending on several important factors. Was the visitor motivated to come to Philadelphia predominantly because of King Tut? How long did the visitor stay in Philadelphia? Did the visitor stay overnight in a hotel? How far did the visitor travel to Philadelphia? To allow for these various levels of economic impact, King Tut visitors were analyzed in these major categories: residents of Philadelphia individuals living outside Philadelphia, but within a one-hour radius, including: those who stayed in a hotel for whom the primary purpose of their visit was to view the King Tut exhibition those who stayed in a hotel who visited King Tut in conjunction with a planned visit to another Philadelphia attraction those who did not stay in a hotel for whom the primary purpose of their visit was to attend the King Tut exhibition those who did not stay in a hotel who visited King Tut in conjunction with a planned visit to another Philadelphia attraction or activity individuals living beyond a one-hour radius, including: those who stayed in a hotel for whom the primary purpose of their visit was to view the King Tut exhibition those who stayed in a hotel who visited King Tut in conjunction with a planned visit to another Philadelphia attraction those who did not stay in a hotel for whom the primary purpose of their visit was to attend the King Tut exhibition those who did not stay in a hotel who visited King Tut in conjunction with a planned visit to another Philadelphia attraction or activity other individuals who visited King Tut as part of a group or special program, including: organized group tours school groups. Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition Page 5

Total visitor spending within the Franklin Institute was calculated based on extensive in-facility operational data. In addition, for those categories of visitors that were King Tut-driven that is, those out-of-town visitors who traveled to Philadelphia specifically to view King Tut out-of- Museum expenditures related to lodging, dining, shopping, local transportation, and attendance at other regional attractions have also been included as components of the exhibition s direct economic impact. Approximately 76% of all individual visitors to the King Tut exhibition were identified as King Tut-driven. As shown in Table 1, taken together, the calculated total direct economic impact of organizational and audience expenditures on the regional economy that are attributable to the King Tut exhibition is $67.9 million. Indirect Economic Impact Assessing the indirect economic impact of these expenditures is complex and involves tracking the additional rounds of spending within the region induced by businesses and their employees as a result of these direct expenditures. In its September 1998 report, Greater Philadelphia s Competitive Edge: The Nonprofit Culture Industry and Its Economic Value to the Region, the Pennsylvania Economy League (PEL) undertook the calculation of these indirect economic multipliers using the IMPLAN economic model of the regional economy. In that analysis, PEL concluded that the appropriate multiplier for indirect economic activity resulting from cultural institutions organizational expenditures was 1.08 and that the appropriate multiplier for indirect economic activity resulting from audience expenditures was 0.86. Applying PEL s multipliers to the organizational and audience expenditures of the King Tut exhibition results in a total indirect economic impact of $59.1 million. Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition Page 6

Employment Impact The King Tut exhibition resulted in significant employment within the region and within Philadelphia (see Table 2). The Franklin Institute and its food services vendor internally supported 145 full-time equivalent positions during the preparation and execution of the King Tut exhibition and the direct organizational expenditures by the Museum and its food services vendor related to the exhibition supported an additional 60 full-time equivalent positions. Employment supported off-site by the very substantial out-of-museum spending of the King Tutdriven visitors is estimated at 1,080 full-time equivalent positions. Taken together, these direct employment impacts total 1,285 full-time equivalent jobs. Due to the location of the Franklin Institute and the fact that much of the audience spending is concentrated in Center City Philadelphia, this employment is concentrated within Philadelphia. Based on the Franklin Institute s employment patterns, the locations of its contractors, and the employment patterns within the key industries in which audience spending was concentrated, we estimate that 1,270 of the total 1,285 full-time equivalent jobs supported by King Tut were located within Philadelphia and 885 full-time equivalent positions were filled by City residents. Table 2 Employment Impacts of King Tut Exhibition Direct Employment Impact Within Within Philadelphia Region Philadelphia Residents Organizational Employees (Annualized FTE Including Food Service Vendor) 145 145 100 FTE Employment Due To Non-Payroll Organizational Expenditures Within The Region 60 45 30 Employment Due To Audience Spending (Outside Venue)--Annualized FTE 1,080 1,080 755 Total Direct FTE Employment Impact In Region 1,285 1,270 885 Indirect Employment Impact Indirect Impact of Organizational Expenditures 130 80 55 Indirect Impact of Audience Spending 580 365 255 Total Indirect Employment Impact 710 445 310 Total Employment Impact 1,995 1,715 1,195 The indirect economic impact of the King Tut exhibition resulted in the creation of a total of 710 full-time equivalent positions 130 indirectly from the Franklin Institute s organizational expenditures and 580 due to the indirect impact of audience spending outside the Museum. Because this indirect economic activity is more diffuse both in terms of industrial sectors and business location this employment is spread more broadly throughout the region. We estimate that 445 of the 710 full-time equivalent positions supported indirectly by the King Tut exhibition were located within Philadelphia and that 310 were filled by City residents. Totaling the direct and indirect economic impacts of the King Tut exhibition, we estimate that the exhibition supported a total of 1,995 full-time equivalent positions, including 1,715 located within Philadelphia and 1,195 held by City residents. Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition Page 7

Tax Revenue Impact The King Tut exhibition generated approximately $11.71 million in tax revenues $5.876 million in increased tax revenue for the City of Philadelphia and $5.835 million for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (see Table 3). Table 3 Summary of Tax Benefits Generated By King Tut Exhibition For City of For State of Total Philadelphia Pennsylvania City & State Taxes on Wages & Salaries $1,782,000 $1,595,000 $3,377,000 Sales & Hotel Taxes $2,077,000 $3,592,000 $5,669,000 Business Privilege Taxes $701,000 $701,000 Net Profits Taxes $52,000 $52,000 Real Estate Taxes Paid On Business Property $604,000 $604,000 Use & Occupancy Taxes Paid On Business Property $339,000 $339,000 State Corporate & Other Business Taxes $648,000 $648,000 Parking Taxes $321,000 $321,000 Total Tax Benefits $5,876,000 $5,835,000 $11,711,000 Wage Tax Revenue Impact The 1,995 full-time equivalent jobs supported directly and indirectly by the King Tut exhibition are estimated to have generated wages & salaries of approximately $51.96 million (see Table 4). Table 4 Wage & Salary Impacts Of King Tut Exhibition (In Millions of Dollars) Direct Wage & Salary Impacts Within Within Philadelphia Region Philadelphia Residents Organizational Payrolls $4.37 $4.37 $3.01 Wages & Salaries Due To Non-Payroll Organizational Expenditures Within The Region $1.84 $1.38 $0.92 Wages & Salaries Due To Audience Spending (Outside Venue) $24.03 $24.03 $16.80 Total Direct Wage & Salary Impacts $30.24 $29.78 $20.73 Indirect Wage & Salary Impacts Indirect Wage & Salary Impact of Organizational Expenditures $3.98 $2.45 $1.68 Indirect Wage & Salary Impact of Audience Spending $17.75 $11.17 $7.80 Total Indirect Wage & Salary Impacts $21.73 $13.62 $9.49 Total Wage & Salary Impacts $51.96 $43.40 $30.22 Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition Page 8

These estimates of wage and salary impact were derived using industrial sector factors developed as part of the PEL IMPLAN analysis adjusted to 2007 dollars. Of this $51.96 million in wages and salaries, $43.4 million is estimated to be earned within Philadelphia and $30.22 million is estimated to be earned by Philadelphia residents. This employment activity is estimated to have generated $1,782,000 in wage tax revenue for the City of Philadelphia and another $1,595,000 in income tax revenue for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (see Table 5). Table 5 Taxes on Wages & Salaries Generated By King Tut Exhibition Total Paid Within Total Paid Within Total Paid To Total Paid Within Philadelphia Philadelphia Philadelphia Philadelphia To Region Residents Non-Philadelphia Residents Total Direct Wages & Salaries $30,240,000 $29,780,000 $20,730,000 $9,050,000 Total Indirect Wages & Salaries $21,725,000 $13,615,000 $9,485,000 $4,130,000 Total Wages & Salaries $51,965,000 $43,395,000 $30,215,000 $13,180,000 Wage Taxes Paid To City of Philadelphia $1,782,000 $1,287,000 $495,000 Income Taxes Paid To State of Pennsylvania $1,595,000 Sales and Hotel Tax Impact Additionally, sales and hotel taxes directly and indirectly resulting from the on-site spending of all King Tut visitors and the out-of-museum spending of King Tut-driven visitors is estimated to have generated another $5,669,000 in increased public revenue, including $2,077,000 in revenue collected by the City of Philadelphia and $3,582,000 in revenue collected by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (see Table 6). Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition Page 9

Table 6 Sales Tax & Hotel Tax Benefits Generated By King Tut Exhibition Total Total Paid To Total Paid To City of Philadelphia State Of Pennsylvania Direct Economic Activity Sales Tax On In-Facility Sales $866,000 $124,000 $742,000 Sales Tax On Audience Shopping (Outside Venue) $536,000 $77,000 $459,000 Sales Tax On Audience Food Spending (Outside Venue) $1,337,000 $191,000 $1,146,000 Liquor Tax On Audience Retail Spending (Outside Venue) $477,000 $477,000 Amusement Tax On Audience Spending (Outside Venue) $38,000 $38,000 Sales Tax on Hotel Rooms $936,000 $134,000 $802,000 Gasoline Tax $136,000 $136,000 Hotel Tax $936,000 $936,000 Total Sales Taxes On Direct Economic Activity $5,262,000 $1,977,000 $3,285,000 Indirect Economic Activity Sales Tax On Taxable Indirect Economic Activity $338,000 $31,000 $307,000 Liquor Tax On Indirect Economic Activity $7,000 $7,000 Hotel Tax $62,000 $62,000 Total Sales Taxes On Indirect Economic Activity $407,000 $100,000 $307,000 Total Sales Taxes $5,669,000 $2,077,000 $3,592,000 Business and Real Estate Tax Impact Of the $127.0 million in total direct and indirect economic impact, $107.38 million is estimated to support private for-profit business activity, including $87.23 million in business activity within Philadelphia (see Table 7). Table 7 For-Profit Business Activity Generated By King Tut Exhibition (In Millions of Dollars) Direct For-Profit Business Activity Within Region Within Philadelphia For-Profit Business Activity Due To Non-Payroll Organizational Expenditures $3.92 $2.94 For-Profit Business Activity Due To Audience Spending $52.34 $52.34 Total Direct For-Profit Business Activity $56.26 $55.28 Indirect For-Profit Business Activity Indirect For-Profit Business Activity Due To Organizational Expenditures $9.34 $5.84 Indirect For-Profit Business Activity Due To Audience Spending $41.78 $26.11 Total Indirect For-Profit Business Activity $51.12 $31.95 Total For-Profit Business Activity $107.38 $87.23 Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition Page 10

This for-profit business activity generated an estimated $1,696,000 in additional tax revenue for the City of Philadelphia and $648,000 for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (see Table 8). Table 8 Business Tax & Real Estate Tax Benefits Generated By King Tut Exhibition Within Region Within Philadelphia Direct For-Profit Business Activity For-Profit Business Activity Due To Non-Payroll Organizational Expenditures $3,920,000 $2,940,000 For-Profit Business Activity Due To Audience Spending $52,340,000 $52,340,000 Total Direct For-Profit Business Activity $56,260,000 $55,280,000 Indirect For-Profit Business Activity Indirect For-Profit Business Activity Due To Organizational Expenditures $9,340,000 $5,840,000 Indirect For-Profit Business Activity Due To Audience Spending $41,780,000 $26,110,000 Total Indirect For-Profit Business Activity $51,120,000 $31,950,000 Total For-Profit Business Activity $107,380,000 $87,230,000 Annual Business Privilege Taxes Paid $701,000 Annual Net Profits Taxes Paid $52,000 Annual Real Estate Taxes Paid On Business Property $604,000 Annual Use & Occupancy Taxes Paid On Business Property $339,000 State Corporate and Other Business Tax Paid $648,000 Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition Page 11

Additional Impacts In order to conservatively calculate the economic impact of the King Tut exhibition, it was determined that out-of-museum expenditures would be calculated only for King Tut-driven visitors those who came to Philadelphia specifically to see King Tut. Off-site expenditures by those King Tut visitors in Philadelphia primarily for another purpose were excluded. It is possible and, indeed, probable, that some of these visitors extended their stay in Philadelphia in order to visit King Tut; however, any additional economic benefits attributable to these lengthened stays have not been measured in this analysis. Total Impacts In summary, the King Tut exhibition generated these significant economic impacts within the Philadelphia Region: Attracted approximately 1,300,000 visitors, including approximately 790,000 general audience visitors who live outside Philadelphia and came to the City specifically to see King Tut; Motivated nearly 540,000 visits to other area cultural attractions by individuals who came to Philadelphia specifically to see King Tut; Generated total economic impact of $127.0 million within the Philadelphia region, through the activities of the Franklin Institute, the in-museum spending of all King Tut visitors, and the out-of-museum spending of those visitors who came to Philadelphia specifically to see King Tut; Created 1,995 full-time equivalent jobs of which 1,715 were located within Philadelphia Produced a total local and state tax benefit of $11.71 million: $5,876,000 in tax revenue for the City of Philadelphia $5,835,000 in tax revenue for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Generated the booking of approximately 99,700 hotel room nights in Philadelphia by individuals coming to Philadelphia specifically to see King Tut; and Motivated 54,000 additional overnight visitors who came to Philadelphia specifically to see King Tut and stayed with friends and family in Philadelphia and the region. Economic Impact of the Tutankhamun and the Golden Age of the Pharoahs Exhibition Page 12