LACTIC ACID FERMENTATION OF BREWERS SPENT GRAIN HYDROLYSATE BY LACTOBACILLUS FERMENTUM AND LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS

Similar documents
Analysing the shipwreck beer

Simultaneous Co-Fermentation of Mixed Sugars: A Promising Strategy for Producing Cellulosic Biofuels and Chemicals

``Exploring Brewing Enzymes``

The study of xylose fermenting yeasts isolated in the Limpopo province. Tshivhase M, E.L Jansen van Rensburg, D.C La Grange

Techno-economic evaluation of an integrated biorefinery using dairy and winery by-products for the microbial oil production

FERMENTATION. By Jeff Louella

Bioethanol Production from Apple Pomace left after Juice Extraction

Specific Yeasts Developed for Modern Ethanol Production

Prod t Diff erenti ti a on

Fermentation of Pretreated Corn Stover Hydrolysate

Sustainable oenology and viticulture: new strategies and trends in wine production

Living Factories. Biotechnology SG Biology

POLLUTION MINIMIZATION BY USING GAIN BASED FERMENTATION PROCESS

AN OVERVIEW OF THE BREWING PROCESS. Jared Long Head Brewer Altitude Chophouse and Brewery

Bioethanol Production from Pineapple Peel Juice using Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Production of Ethanol from Papaya Waste

Genetic Optimisation of C6 and C5 Sugar Fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Exploring Attenuation. Greg Doss Wyeast Laboratories Inc. NHC 2012

Evaluation of the Malting and Brewing Performance of the New Canadian Malting Barley Variety Norman

PRODUCTION OF BEER Page 1

GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF FRESH BAKER S YEAST

Mashing! How? Why? To what extent?!

yeast-derived flavours

Nutrition 1 amino acids The chemical building blocks of proteins. 2 ascorbic acid Vitamin C 3 BMR Basal metabolism, or the rate of energy use by the

The role of CACTUS PEARS for human consumption

Raw barley is steeped in 5-15 C water for a few days and then allowed to dry during which it begins to germinate. Fig 1. Barley

MAKING WINE WITH HIGH AND LOW PH JUICE. Ethan Brown New Mexico State University 11/11/2017

Making Ethanol 1 of 22 Boardworks Ltd 2012

Development of Recombinant Yeast for Cellulosic Ethanol Production From Concept to Large-Scale Production

FOOD PRODUCTION - BEVERAGES Demonstrate knowledge of brewhouse operations and wort production

Metabolic Engineering of a Strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Capable of Utilizing Xylose for Growth and Ethanol Production

1) The following(s) is/are the β-lactum antibiotic(s) 2) The amino acid(s) play(s) important role in the biosynthesis of cephalosporin is/are

WORLD PASTA CONGRESS Scientific Consensus Conference: the Healthy Pasta Meal Milano, Italy October

Dr.Nibras Nazar. Microbial Biomass Production: Bakers yeast

The malting process Kilned vs. roasted Specialty grains and steeping Malt extract production

Incorporation of sweet sorghum Juice in the current dry-grind ethanol process for improved ethanol yields, energy saving, and water efficiency

Unit code: A/601/1687 QCF level: 5 Credit value: 15

BIOCHEMICAL PROCESSES BY MASHING AND CHARACTERIZATION OF THE FERMENTATION OF FEED BARLEY DURING BREWING

Beer Clarity. Brad Smith, PhD

When quality comes first. Solutions for craft brewers

PRODUCTION OF ETHANOL FROM MAHUA FLOWER (MADHUCA LATIFOLIA L.) USING SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE 3044 AND STUDY OF PARAMETERS WHILE FERMENTATION

Optimization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae immobilization in bacterial cellulose by adsorption- incubation method

Beauty and the Yeast - part II

Bacteria. Fungi. Algae. Types of micro-organisms used in food production. Lactic acid bacteria Cyanobacteria (also known as blue-green algae)

DasarTeknologi Fermentasi. -Introduction of Fermentation Process-

Raw materials. MALT (Malted cereal, usually barley) WATER

Effect of Yeast Propagation Methods on Fermentation Efficiency

Evaluation of the Malting and Brewing Performance the new Canadian Two Row Variety Cerveza

Yeast and Flavour Production. Tobias Fischborn Lallemand Brewing

Beer Clarity. Brad Smith, PhD

CMBTC 2017 Crop MALTING BARLEY QUALITY ASSESSMENT Preliminary Report

FOOD PROCESSING INDUSTRY (BREWERIES, WINERIES WASTE)

ALTERNATE FEEDSTOCKS FOR ALCOHOL PRODUCTION ACHIEVING EBP SUCCESS

RISK MANAGEMENT OF BEER FERMENTATION DIACETYL CONTROL

DDGS Sulfur Content. Sources And Possible Ways To Maintain Lower Levels Distillers Grain Technology Council Symposium

2012 Crop CDC Meredith Malting and Brewing Trials

Yeast- Gimme Some Sugar

The Science of Mashing. Jamie Ramshaw M Brew IBD 25/10/17

Chemical composition and allergic activity of bread Relationship to non-yeast microorganisms and baking temperatures-

Understanding the composition of grape marc and its potential as a livestock feed supplement

Lysozyme side effects in Grana Padano PDO cheese: new perspective after 30 years using

Portada. Mauricio Guevara S.

2013 Crop AAC Synergy Pilot Malting and Brewing Trials

A Comparative Study on Casein and Albumin Contents in Cow and Commercial Milk Samples

Professional Analytical Services Catalogue

Consumer Education VCO Processing Methods (Dry & Wet Methods)

Value Added Products from Apple Pomace

FUNCTIONAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF OAT GRAIN AND A LINE OF PROMISING FOOD PRODUCTS ON ITS BASIS

Future of the Malt NMBT Timo Huttunen. Viking Malt

Advanced Yeast Handling. BFD education Kai Troester

Beer Preparation for Packaging. Jamie Ramshaw M.Brew Simpsons Malt

Study of some yeast strains in order to be used for ethanol production from whey

2012 Crop CDC Kindersley Malting & Brewing Trials

Making the Best of Cheese and Dairy in Bakery Products

2014 Crop Merit 57 Pilot Malting and Brewing Trials

CONCENTRATED MILK. Dairy Processing Technology 2012/2013

SCREENING OF ZYMOMONAS MOBILIS AND SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE STRAINS FOR ETHANOL ETHANOL PRODUCTION FROM CASSAVA WASTE

STEP1 Check the ingredients used for cooking, their weight, and cooking method. Table19 Ingredient name and weight of company A s Chop Suey

The following is a growing list of different malt & adjunct types.

Colored Malt Products June 23, 2012 Robert Seggewiss 3/07/2012 1

Water (and context) Paul Shick BJCP Study Group Market Garden, September 20, 2017

Make Products from Waste Rice Husk.

Natural sourdough for best fermentation flavour

YEASTS ISOLATION AND SELECTION FOR BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION FROM INULIN HYDROLYSATES

Qualifications. The Certificate in the Fundamentals of Brewing and Packaging of Beer (FBPB) Full Examination Syllabus

An overview of beer flavour and sensory training

Pilot technology and equipment to produce baking yeast in shorter multiplication cycle

Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry ISSN Available online at

Malting and Brewing Trials with 2011 Crop Barley Samples of CDC PolarStar and AC Metcalfe

Pilot Malting and Brewing Trials with 2011 Crop CDC Meredith Barley

Corn: Zea Mays, family poaceae, commonly known as Maize.

Quorn the production of alternative first-class protein source for a balanced, sustainable diet.

Anaerobic Cell Respiration by Yeast

Brewing Water Derek Colby

Types of Sanitizers. Heat, w/ water or steam to saturate effect

This place covers: Raw materials used in preparing beer (e.g. malt, hops), and treatment thereof.

Definition of Honey and Honey Products

CMBTC 2015 MALTING BARLEY CROP QUALITY ASSESSMENT Preliminary Report

Brewing Process all grain

MATURITY AND RIPENING PROCESS MATURITY

Transcription:

LACTIC ACID FERMENTATION OF BREWERS SPENT GRAIN HYDROLYSATE BY LACTOBACILLUS FERMENTUM AND LACTOBACILLUS RHAMNOSUS Jelena Pejin 1*, Ljiljana Mojović 2, Sunčica Kocić- Tanackov 1, Miloš Radosavljević 1, Aleksandra Djukić- Vuković 2 1 Faculty of Technology, University of Novi Sad, Bulevar Cara Lazara 1, 21 000 Novi Sad, Serbia 2 Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University of Belgrade, Karnegijeva 4, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia FoodTech Congress, October 28-30, Novi Sad, Serbia

PROJECT Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Project number TR-31017) Title: Increase in bioethanol production efficiency from renewable raw materials with total usage of by-products Leader: Prof. dr Ljiljana Mojović, Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University of Belgrade 2008-2011

PROJECT Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Project number TR-31017) Title: Production of lactic acid and probiotics on waste products of food and agro-industry Leader: Prof. dr Ljiljana Mojović, Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, University of Belgrade 2011-

Total usage of triticale Triticale stillage obtained after bioethanol production was used for lactic acid production Liquid triticale stillage was a good raw material for lactic acid fermentation.

Beer is the most commonly consumed alcoholic beverage in the world

Beer is a malt beverage produced by an alcoholic fermentation of the aqueous of malted barley with hops. Brewing is therefore a multistage process involving biological conversion of raw materials to final product.

Beer production scheme

BREWERS SPENT GRAIN

Brewers spent grain (BSG) is the major by-product of the brewing industry, representing around 85% of the total by-products generated. Per 100 L of beer produced 20 kg of brewers spent grain are obtained. The chemical composition of brewers spent grain varies according: to barley variety, harvest time, malting and mashing conditions, and the quality and type of adjuncts used in the brewing process.

Brewers spent grain is a lignocellulosic material rich in protein and fibre, which account for around 20 and 70% of its composition, respectively. Component (% dry matter) Bogar et al. (2002) Mussatto and Roberto (2005) Serena and Knudsen (2007) Dehnavi (2009) Cellulose 15 16.8 14.7 2.2 15.1 Hemicellulose 23 28.4-32.5 Lignin 22 27.8 12.6 0.6 13.4 1.9 Proteins 18 15.25 21.5 2.1 - Ash - 4.6 4.8 0.5 3.4 0.1 Carbohydrates - - 52.5 4.0 - Lipids - - 11.7 0.5 - Starch 12-6.0 1.4 12.5

The use of brewer s spent grain is still limited, being basically used as animal feed and in human nutrition.

Its possible applications are as a raw material in: biotechnology, energy production, charcoal production, paper manufacture, Or as a brick component, and adsorbent.

Yeast carrier in beer fermentation Microorganisms Enzymes Biogas Brewers spent grain Phenolic acids Bioethanol Lactic acid Xylitol and pullulan

Lactic acid

Currently, there is an increased demand for lactic acid as a raw material for the production of biopolymer poly-lactic acid (PLA) which is a promising biodegradable, biocompatible, and environmentally friendly alternative to plastics derived from petrochemicals. Food and food-related applications account for approximately 85% of the demand for lactic acid. The demand for lactic acid has been estimated to grow yearly at 5 8%.

The annual world market for lactic acid production was expected to reach 367,300 metric tons by the year 2017. There are two optical isomers of lactic acid, L- (+)-lactic acid and D-(-)-lactic acid. Lactic acid can be manufactured either by chemical synthesis or by microbial fermentations.

Presently, almost all lactic acid produced worldwide comes from the fermentative production route. A desired isomer of lactic acid can be produced via fermentation using selected lactic acid-producing strains. Besides this, microbial lactic acid fermentation offers an advantage in terms of the utilization of renewable carbohydrate biomass, low production temperature and energy consumption.

Most lactic acid bacteria require a wide range of growth factors including amino acids, vitamins, fatty acids, purines, and pyrimidines for their growth and biological activity. Thus, the substrate composition and nutritional requirements of the strain considerably affect the overall performance of the fermentation.

Brewers spent grain During the fermentation, determination of: Lactic acid concentration (L-/D-lactic acid assay, Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland) Reducing sugar content (Miller, G. L. (1959). Anal. Chem., 31, 426-428 Cells viability (pour plate technique, MRS agar, 30 C or 37 C) ph value Brewers spent grain hydrolysis ph 5.5 and 5.0 Termamyl SC (1 hour at 90 C), SAN Super 240 L (1 hour at 55 C), Celluclast 1.5 L (10 hours at 45 C) at 180 rpm Centrifugation Sterile liquid hydrolysate fermentation media CaCO 3 or NaOH Reducing sugars content Yeast content Fermentation L. fermentum PL-1 at 30 C L. rhamnosus ATCC 7469 at 37 C 150 rpm Lactic acid

BREWERS SPENT GRAIN HYDROLYSIS OPTIMIZATION Brewers spent grain obtained in a lager beer production was dried at 40ºC for 12 hours. Brewers spent grain hydrolysis was carried out under optimal conditions using the following enzymes: 1. Termamyl SC - α-amylase, 2. SAN Super 240 L glucoamylase, and 3. Celluclast 1.5 L cellulase (Novozymes, Denmark).

Different Temperatures: Termamyl SC 80, 85 or 90ºC (1 hour) San Super 240 L 50, 55 or 60ºC (1 hour) Celluclast 1.5 L 40, 45 or 50ºC (10 hours) ph values: 5.0, 5.5 and 6.0 for each enzyme Amounts: Termamyl SC 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 ml pre 50g San Super 240 L 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 ml pre 50g Celluclast 1.5 L 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 or 6.0 ml per 50g

Reducing sugars content, g/l 30 ph 5.5 Termamyl SC and San Super 240 L, ph 5.0 Celluclast 1.5 L 27.15 25 20 15 10 5 0 ph 5.5 0.3mL TSC; 0.3mL San Super; ph 5.0 3.0mL Celluclast ph 5.5 0.3mL TSC; 0.3mL San Super; ph 5.0 4.0mL Celluclast ph 5.5 0,3mL TSC; 0.3mL San Super; ph 5.0 5.0mL Celluclast ph 5.5 0.3mL TSC; 0.3mL San Super; ph 5.0 6.0mL Celluclast 0 3 6 9 12 Time, hours

Lactic Lactic acid acid content content, (g/l) g/l 0.50 4.5 0.45 4.0 0.40 3.5 0.35 3.0 0.30 0.25 2.5 0.20 2.0 L-(+)-lactic acid increase 732.56-841.86% 0.15 1.5 0.10 1.0 0.05 0.5 0.00 0.0 Without calcium-carbonate 3.0% 0.5% of addition L-(+)-lactic acid acid Without calcium-carbonate 3.0% 0.5% of addition D-(-)-lactic acid acid With calcium-carbonate 4.0% 1.0% of addition L-(+)-lactic acid acid 1.0% With calcium-carbonate 4.0% of addition D-(-)-lactic D-(-)-lactic acid acid 5.0% 2.0% of L-(+)-lactic acid 0 24 5.0% 2.0% of 48 D-(-)-lactic acid 72 0 24 Time, hours 48 72 Time, hours Lactic acid content in Lactobacillus fermentum PL-1 fermentations

Viability, log CFU/mL 10.0 7.8 9.5 7.6 7.4 9.0 9.69 7.58 33.38% increase 7.2 8.5 7.0 8.0 6.8 3.47% increase 7.5 6.6 0.5% of 7.0 6.4 1.0% of 2.0% of 6.5 3.0% of 6.2 4.0% Without of calcium-carbonate addition 5.0% With of calcium-carbonate addition 6.0 6.0 00 24 48 72 Time, hours Time, hours Lactobacillus fermentum PL-1 cells viability during fermentations

Lactic Lactic acid acid content, g/l g/l g/l 18 12 16 10 14 12 8 L-(+)-lactic acid content increase 1677-1936% L-(+)-lactic content increase 1248% 15.69 10.65 10 6 8 64 4 2 2 0 0.5% of L-(+)-lactic acid 0.5% Without calcium-carbonate 3.0% of of D-(-)-lactic addition L-(+)-lactic acid D-(-)-lactic acid 1.0% acid With calcium-carbonate 3.0% of of L-(+)-lactic addition D-(-)-lactic acid L-(+)-lactic acid 1.0% of D-(-)-lactic acid With calcium-carbonate 4.0% of 2.0% of addition L-(+)-lactic L-(+)-lactic D-(-)-lactic acid 4.0% of D-(-)-lactic acid acid 2.0% 5.0% of of D-(-)-lactic L-(+)-lactic acid acid 0 48 48 72 72 0 24 48 72 Without calcium-carbonate addition L-(+)-lactic acid Time, hours Lactic acid content in Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 7469 fermentations

Viability, log log CFU/mL 10.3 9 9.8 8 9.3 7 9.03 9.79 105.14% increase 120.56% increase 6 8.8 5 8.3 4 3 7.8 2 7.3 1 Without calcium-carbonate addition With calcium-carbonate addition 6.8 0 0 24 24 48 72 Time, hours hours 0.5% of 1.0% of 2.0% of 3.0% of 4.0% of 5.0% of Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 7469 cells viability during fermentations

Total lactic acid yield, % Lactobacillus fermentum PL-1 Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 7469 100 90 80 78.01 91.33 97.69 97.62 98.71 97.74 98.53 97.52 70 60 50 40 30 30.68 34.88 36.42 38.50 37.78 39.22 39.50 44.00 20 10 0 Without CaCO₃ With CaCO₃ 0.5% of 1.0% of 2.0% of 3.0% of 4.0% of 5.0% of Lactic acid fermentation

Brewers spent grain During the fermentation, determination of: Lactic acid concentration (L-/D-lactic acid assay, Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland) Reducing sugar content (Miller, G. L. (1959). Anal. Chem., 31, 426-428 Cells viability (pour plate technique, MRS agar, 30 C or 37 C) ph value Brewers spent grain hydrolysis ph 5.5 and 5.0 Termamyl SC (1 hour at 90 C), SAN Super 240 L (1 hour at 55 C), Celluclast 1.5 L (10 hours at 45 C) at 180 rpm Centrifugation Sterile liquid hydrolysate fermentation media NaOH Reducing sugars content (2.7, 5.4, and 8.1%) Yeast content (0.5-5.0%) Fermentation L. rhamnosus ATCC 7469 at 37 C 150 rpm Lactic acid

L-(+)-lactic acid content, g/l 16 2.7% of reducing sugars 14 13.95 12 10 38.22-53.63% increase 8 6 4 2 0 0 12 24 36 Time, hours Without addition 0.5% of 1.0% of 2.0% of 3.0% of 4.0% of 5.0% of

L-(+)-lactic acid content, g/l 45 40 35 30 25 20 Without addition 0.5% of 1.0% of 2.0% of 3.0% of 4.0% of 5.0% of 5.4% of reducing sugars 39.38 68.39-90.33% increase 15 10 5 0 0 12 24 36 Time, hours

L-(+)-lactic acid content, g/l 65 60 55 8.1% of reducing sugars 60.33 50 45 40 35 77.49-103.61% increase 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 24 48 72 Time, hours Without addition 0.5% of 1.0% of 2.0% of 3.0% of 4.0% of 5.0% of

Viability, log CFU/mL 9.8 9.6 2.7% of reducing sugars 9.62 9.4 9.2 3.89-6.89% increase 9.0 8.8 8.6 8.4 8.2 8.0 7.8 Without addition 0.5% of 1.0% of 2.0% of 3.0% of 4.0% of 5.0% of 0 12 24 36 Time, hours

Viability, log CFU/mL 9.8 9.6 9.4 5.4% of reducing sugars 9.67 9.2 9.0 1.30-4.65% increase 8.8 8.6 8.4 8.2 8.0 7.8 Without addition 0.5% of 1.0% of 2.0% of 3.0% of 4.0% of 5.0% of 0 12 24 36 Time, hours

Viability, CFU/mL 10.0 9.8 9.6 9.4 8.1% of reducing sugars 9.72 9.2 9.0 8.8 8.6 8.4 8.2 8.0 7.8 1.93-4.07% increase Without addition 0.5% of 1.0% of 2.0% of 3.0% of 4.0% of 5.0% of 0 24 48 72 Time, hours

L-(+)-lactic acid yield, % 100 6.12% increase 90 80 80.39 82.44 82.86 83.66 84.06 84.89 86.51 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Without addition 0.5% of 1.0% of 2.0% of 3.0% of 4.0% of 5.0% of Lactic acid fermentation

L-(+)-lactic acid yield, % 100 90 80 81.13 85.90 86.88 10.16% increase 89.52 89.78 90.70 91.29 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Without addition 0.5% of 1.0% of 2.0% of 3.0% of 4.0% of 5.0% of Lactic acid fermentation

L-(+)-lactic acid yield, % 100 6.62% increase 90 80 80.71 83.23 83.57 84.64 85.27 86.38 87.33 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Without addition 0.5% of 1.0% of 2.0% of 3.0% of Lactic acid fermentation 4.0% of 5.0% of

Volumetric productivity (g/l h) Time, hours Without addition 0.5% of 1.0% of 2.0% of 3.0% of 4.0% of 5.0% of 12 0.63 0.74 0.80 0.86 0.87 0.88 0.90 24 0.38 0.50 0.52 0.52 0.53 0.54 0.54 36 0.25 0.35 0.35 0.36 0.37 0.38 0.39

Volumetric productivity (g/l h) Time, hours Without addition 0.5% of 1.0% of 2.0% of 3.0% of 4.0% of 5.0% of 12 0.67 1.05 1.14 1.49 1.60 1.65 1.69 24 0.58 1.15 1.18 1.30 1.34 1.38 1.44 36 0.57 0.97 0.98 1.04 1.07 1.08 1.09

Volumetric productivity (g/l h) Time, hours Without addition 0.5% of 1.0% of 2.0% of 3.0% of 4.0% of 5.0% of 24 0.61 1.06 1.22 1.34 1.40 1.51 1.54 48 0.60 0.91 0.99 1.02 1.03 1.11 1.12 72 0.41 0.73 0.76 0.77 0.78 0.83 0.84

Brewers spent grain During the fermentation, determination of: Lactic acid concentration (L-/D-lactic acid assay, Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland) Reducing sugar content (Miller, G. L. (1959). Anal. Chem., 31, 426-428 Cells viability (pour plate technique, MRS agar, 30 C or 37 C) ph value Brewers spent grain hydrolysis ph 5.5 and 5.0 Termamyl SC (1 hour at 90 C), SAN Super 240 L (1 hour at 55 C), Celluclast 1.5 L (10 hours at 45 C) at 180 rpm Centrifugation Sterile liquid hydrolysate fermentation media NaOH Brewers (0.5-5.0%) Reducing sugars content Fermentation L. rhamnosus ATCC 7469 at 37 C 150 rpm Lactic acid

The possibilities of using spent brewers (Spent Brewer s Yeast and Beta-Glucans Isolated From Them as Diet Components Modifying Blood Lipid Metabolism Disturbed by an Atherogenic Diet, B. Waszkiewicz- Robak, 2013)

L-(+)-lactic acid content, g/l 18 16 15.75 14 12 6.61-73.46% increase 10 8 6 4 2 0 Without brewers' addition 0.5% of brewers' 1.0% of brewers' 2.0% of brewers' 3.0% of brewers' 4.0% of brewers' 5.0% of brewers' 0 12 24 36 Time, hours

L-(+)-lactic acid content, g/l 30 5% of reducing sugars 27.03 25 20 13.24-30.64% increase 15 10 5 0 0 12 24 36 Time, hours Without brewers' addition 0.5% of brewers' 1.0% of brewers' 2.0% of brewers' 3.0% of brewers' 4.0% of brewers' 5.0% of brewers'

Viability, log CFU/mL 9.8 9.6 9.4 9.2 9.0 8.8 1.22-5.00% increase 9.45 8.6 8.4 8.2 8.0 7.8 Without brewers' addition 0.5% of brewers' 1.0% of brewers' 2.0% of brewers' 3.0% of brewers' 4.0% of brewers' 5.0% of brewers' 0 12 24 36 Time, hours

Viability, log CFU/mL 9.8 5% of reducing sugars 9.6 9.52 9.4 9.2 9.0 8.8 0.76-3.03% increase 8.6 8.4 8.2 8.0 7.8 0 12 24 36 Time, hours Without brewers' addition 0.5% of brewers' 1.0% of brewers' 2.0% of brewers' 3.0% of brewers' 4.0% of brewers' 5.0% of brewers'

L-(+)-lactic acid yield, % 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 5.51% increase 80.39 82.13 82.65 83.06 83.55 83.96 85.90 0 Without brewers' addition 0.5% of brewers' 1.0% of brewers' 2.0% of brewers' 3.0% of brewers' Lactic acid fermentation 4.0% of brewers' 5.0% of brewers'

L-(+)-lactic acid yield, % 100 7.88% increase 90 80 81.13 84.69 84.85 86.74 87.28 88.18 89.01 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Without brewers' addition 0.5% of brewers' 1.0% of brewers' 2.0% of brewers' 3.0% of brewers' Lactic acid fermentation 4.0% of brewers' 5.0% of brewers'

Time, hours Without brewers addition 0.5% of brewers Volumetric productivity (g/l h) 1.0% of brewers 2.0% of brewers 3.0% of brewers 4.0% of brewers 5.0% of brewers 12 0.63 0.65 0.66 0.67 0.69 0.70 0.79 24 0.38 0.38 0.40 0.43 0.43 0.48 0.54 36 0.25 0.27 0.28 0.30 0.31 0.39 0.44 Time, hours Without brewers addition 0.5% of brewers Volumetric productivity (g/l h) 1.0% of brewers 2.0% of brewers 3.0% of brewers 4.0% of brewers 5.0% of brewers 12 0.67 0.67 0.71 0.79 0.83 0.87 0.89 24 0.58 0.66 0.69 0.77 0.79 0.81 0.83 36 0.57 0.65 0.67 0.71 0.73 0.74 0.75

Brewers spent grain Brewers spent grain hydrolysis ph 5.5 and 5.0 Termamyl SC (1 hour at 90 C), SAN Super 240 L (1 hour at 55 C), Celluclast 1.5 L (10 hours at 45 C) at 180 rpm During the fermentation, determination of: Lactic acid concentration (L-/D-lactic acid assay, Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland) Reducing sugar content (Miller, G. L. (1959). Anal. Chem., 31, 426-428 Cells viability (pour plate technique, MRS agar, 30 C or 37 C) ph value Centrifugation Sterile liquid hydrolysate fermentation media NaOH Glucose (after 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours) to the initial content Glucose and (after 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours) to the initial content High gravity wort (10 ml every 4 hours) Fermentation L. rhamnosus ATCC 7469 at 37 C 150 rpm Lactic acid

L-(+)-lactic acid content, g/l 130 120 110 Without glucose and addition during fermentation With glucose addition With glucose and addition With wort addition 114.79 100 90 80 70 156.96-191.49% increase 60 50 40 66.10-86.41% increase 30 20 10 0 0 12 24 36 48 60 Time, hours

Viability, log CFU/mL 10.2 9.8 9.88 9.4 9.0 8.6 8.2 7.8 Without glucose and addition during fermentation With glucose addition With glucose and addition With wort addition 0 12 24 36 48 60 Time, hours

L-(+)-lactic acid yield, % 100 90 91.29 92.76 93.32 89.84 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Without glucose and addition during fermentation With glucose addition With glucose and addition Lactic acid fermentation With wort addition

Time, hours Without glucose and addition during fermentation Volumetric productivity (g/l h) With glucose addition With glucose and addition With wort addition 12 1.69 1.45 1.50 1.48 24 1.44 1.74 1.94 2.02 36 1.09 1.82 2.04 1.83 48-1.80 1.91 1.71 60-1.80 1.91 1.69

Colleagues: Ljiljana Mojović Sunčica Kocić-Tanackov Miloš Radosavljević Aleksandra Djukić-Vuković Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Project number TR-31017) Carlsberg Serbia Novozymes, Denmark

THANK YOU KINDLY!