Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States,

Similar documents
Creating Health for Your Patients and Your Practice

The Next Generation Food Company {for generations of healthy kids} Kirsten Saenz Tobey, MBA Revolution Foods Co-Founder and CIO

Coffee Consumption and Gallbladder Disease Ruhl and Everhart Association of Coffee Consumption with Gallbladder Disease

Frequency of a diagnosis of glaucoma in individuals who consume coffee, tea and/or soft drinks

November 9, Myde Boles, Ph.D. Program Design and Evaluation Services Multnomah County Health Department and Oregon Public Health Division

ASHA Conference, Portland, OR 10/11/2014

Problem. Background & Significance 6/29/ _3_88B 1 CHD KNOWLEDGE & RISK FACTORS AMONG FILIPINO-AMERICANS CONNECTED TO PRIMARY CARE SERVICES

Caffeine and Theobromine Intakes of Children: Results From CSFII , 1998

Food Allergies on the Rise in American Children

Availability of Nutritional Information in a National Sample of Fast Food Restaurants

Child-Directed Marketing at Fast- Food Restaurants: Who is marketing to whom?

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Obesity

AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Oregon State College Uta. A. Schoenfeld, Director Corvallis. Circular of Information No.

Flowering and Fruiting Morphology of Hardy Kiwifruit, Actinidia arguta

The Effect of Green Tea on the Texture, Taste and Moisture of Gharidelli Double Chocolate Brownies

Red Wine and Cardiovascular Disease. Does consuming red wine prevent cardiovascular disease?

DOES BEER PLAY A SOLE ROLE IN ALCOHOL AND HEALTH SYMPHONY?

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

AIC Issues Brief. The Availability and Cost of Healthier Food Items Karen M. Jetter and Diana L. Cassady 1. Agricultural Issues Center

Classification Bias in Commercial Business Lists for Retail Food Outlets in the U.S

CCEI530B: Nutrition II: Nutrition and Food Service in the Childcare Setting Course Handout

A H e a l t h S n a p s h o t o f O u r C o m m u n i t i e s

Food Policy, Economics and Obesity Prevention

Power and Priorities: Gender, Caste, and Household Bargaining in India

Healthy Food Access Policy JOHN WEIDMAN THE FOOD TRUST

Growth in early yyears: statistical and clinical insights

The University of North Texas Dining Services White Paper: A Vegetarian Diet

RESEARCH UPDATE from Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute by Natalia Kolyesnikova, PhD Tim Dodd, PhD THANK YOU SPONSORS

1) What proportion of the districts has written policies regarding vending or a la carte foods?

This appendix tabulates results summarized in Section IV of our paper, and also reports the results of additional tests.

Suicide Mortality Risk in the United States by Sex and Age Groups

FML Tackling Obesity: Determining the role of the food and drink industry in communicating facts about sugar: orange juice as a case study

COMPARISON OF EMPLOYMENT PROBLEMS OF URBANIZATION IN DISTRICT HEADQUARTERS OF HYDERABAD KARNATAKA REGION A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY

An update from the Competitiveness and Market Analysis Section, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry.

Release #2461 Release Date: Thursday, February 20, 2014

North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Division of Public Health. November 25, 2013

Pediatric Food Allergies: Physician and Parent. Robert Anderson MD Rachel Anderson Syracuse, NY March 3, 2018

Influence of the Built Environment on Physical Activity, Diet, and Obesity in Children

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

Investigating China s Stalled Revolution : Husband and Wife Involvement in Housework in the PRC. Juhua Yang Susan E. Short

Multiple Imputation for Missing Data in KLoSA

The changing face of the U.S. consumer: How shifting demographics are re-shaping the U.S. consumer market for wine

PROCEDURE million pounds of pecans annually with an average

US Chicken Consumption. Presentation to Chicken Marketing Summit July 18, 2017 Asheville, NC

Delineating Urban Food Deserts and Associated Health Impacts - Nashville, Tennessee

Community differences in availability of prepared, readyto-eat foods in U.S. food stores

Missing value imputation in SAS: an intro to Proc MI and MIANALYZE

SEMINOLE COUNTY AUDIT OF THE ALTERNATIVE FEE RATE STUDIES SEPTEMBER 2008

Online Appendix. for. Female Leadership and Gender Equity: Evidence from Plant Closure

RESULTS OF THE MARKETING SURVEY ON DRINKING BEER

Smart Meal Seal NCSL Shana Patterson, RD Nutrition Coordinator Colorado Physical Activity and Nutrition (COPAN) program

Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape

Bt Corn IRM Compliance in Canada

United Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley Community Needs Update:

Update on Wheat vs. Gluten-Free Bread Properties

What do vegetarians in the United States eat? 1 4

LESSON 5 & DARK GREEN

Fleurieu zone (other)

Research - Strawberry Nutrition

Vegetable Spotlight Broccoli

UPPER MIDWEST MARKETING AREA THE BUTTER MARKET AND BEYOND

Denver Urban Gardens School Garden and Nutrition Curriculum Fat Sandwiches Lesson. Goals! Students learn about healthy and unhealthy meal choices.!

FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SOFT DRINK CONSUMPTION IN PRESCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN IN SRI LANKA.

BEEF Effect of processing conditions on nutrient disappearance of cold-pressed and hexane-extracted camelina and carinata meals in vitro 1

Healthy Food Procurement in the County of Los Angeles Public Health Alliance of Southern California Leadership Council May 31, 2013

Menu Labeling Evaluation

The University of Georgia

Which of your fingernails comes closest to 1 cm in width? What is the length between your thumb tip and extended index finger tip? If no, why not?

HEALTHY EATING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY: A POLICY FOR CHILD CARE

PEEL RIVER HEALTH ASSESSMENT

What are the Driving Forces for Arts and Culture Related Activities in Japan?

American Hispanics Access to Healthy Foods. Ben Golan

Labor Requirements and Costs for Harvesting Tomatoes. Zhengfei Guan, 1 Feng Wu, and Steven Sargent University of Florida

Biologist at Work! Experiment: Width across knuckles of: left hand. cm... right hand. cm. Analysis: Decision: /13 cm. Name

Supplementary Table 1. Glycemic load (GL) and glycemic index (GI) of individual fruits. Carbohydrate (g/serving)

Shopping behaviours of different food and drinks consumption groups 35% 27% 16%

Exploring the food environment around postprimary schools in Ireland.

An update from the Competitiveness and Market Analysis Branch, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry.

Soybean Seeding Date Effects on Productivity Jane Froese 1, Bruce Brolley 2 and Derek Lewis 1

Missing Data Treatments

PUBLIC HEALTH BRIEF 2011 UPDATE HEALTHIER CHOICES IN SCHOOL VENDING MACHINES: SURVEY RESULTS FROM MAHONING COUNTY SCHOOLS

Effect of Inocucor on strawberry plants growth and production

From Appetites to Zucchini: Taking Small Steps Towards Creating a More Nutrition Focused Food Program

Characteristics of U.S. Veal Consumers

National Vintage Report 2017

(A report prepared for Milk SA)

DATA AND ASSUMPTIONS (TAX CALCULATOR REVISION, MARCH 2017)

J / A V 9 / N O.

Availability of Healthy Snacks in Stores Near Low-Income Urban, High-Income Urban, and Rural Elementary/Middle Schools

SENSATIONAL SEASONINGS Idaho Child Nutrition Programs

McDONALD'S AS A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITY

MBA 503 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

Consumption of Dryland Indigenous Fruits to Improve Livelihoods in Kenya. The Case of Mwingi District.

IMS Quarterly Monitoring Report Quarter 2: 2016/ (1,531) 801 (1,291) 149 (240) 1,825 (3,810) 21 (50) 4,357 (8,519) 0 (6) 371 (772) 45 (110)

Consumer study on fruit - In depth interviews -

Primary Prevention of Food Allergies

The Economic Impact of the Craft Brewing Industry in Maine. School of Economics Staff Paper SOE 630- February Andrew Crawley*^ and Sarah Welsh

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OVERALL, WE FOUND THAT:

MARYLAND VITAL STATISTICS ANNUAL REPORT 2013

The 2006 Economic Impact of Nebraska Wineries and Grape Growers

Transcription:

NCHS Data Brief No. 288 October 7 Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults and Youth: United States, 5 6 Craig M. Hales, M.D., Margaret D. Carroll, M.S.P.H., Cheryl D. Fryar, M.S.P.H., and Cynthia L. Ogden, Ph.D. Key findings Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey In 5 6, the prevalence of obesity was 39.8% in adults and 8.5% in youth. The prevalence of obesity was higher among middle-aged adults (42.8%) than among younger adults (35.7%). The prevalence of obesity was higher among youth aged 6 years (8.4%) and adolescents aged 2 9 years (.6%) compared with children aged 2 5 years (3.9%). The overall prevalence of obesity was higher among non-hispanic black and Hispanic adults than among non-hispanic white and non-hispanic Asian adults. The same pattern was seen among youth. The observed change in prevalence between 3 4 and 5 6 was not significant among both adults and youth. Obesity is associated with serious health risks (). Monitoring obesity prevalence is relevant for public health programs that focus on reducing or preventing obesity. Between 3 4 and 3 4, there were no significant changes in childhood obesity prevalence, but adults showed an increasing trend (2). This report provides the most recent national estimates from 5 6 on obesity prevalence by sex, age, and race and Hispanic origin, and overall estimates from 999 through 5 6. Keyword: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey What was the prevalence of obesity in adults in 5 6? The prevalence of obesity among U.S. adults was 39.8% (crude). Overall, the prevalence among adults aged 4 59 (42.8%) was higher than among adults aged 39 (35.7%). No significant difference in prevalence was seen between adults aged 6 and over (4.%) and younger age groups (Figure ). Figure. Prevalence of obesity among adults aged and over, by sex and age: United States, 5 6 5 4 3 39.6 35.7 42.8 4. and over 39 4 59 6 and over 37.9 34.8 4.8 38.5 4. Total Men Women Significantly different from those aged 39. NOTES: Estimates for adults aged and over were age adjusted by the direct method to the U.S. census population using the age groups 39, 4 59, and 6 and over. Crude estimates are 39.8% for total, 38.% for men, and 4.5% for women. Access data table for Figure at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db288_table.pdf#. SOURCE: NCHS, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 5 6. 36.5 44.7 43. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics

NCHS Data Brief No. 288 October 7 Among both men and women, the prevalence of obesity followed a similar pattern by age. Men aged 4 59 (4.8%) had a higher prevalence of obesity than men aged 39 (34.8%). Women aged 4 59 (44.7%) had a higher prevalence of obesity than women aged 39 (36.5%). For both men and women, the prevalence of obesity among those aged 6 and over was not significantly different from the prevalence among those aged 39 or 4 59. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of obesity between men and women overall or by age group. Were there differences in the prevalence of obesity among adults by race and Hispanic origin in 5 6? The prevalence of obesity was lower among non-hispanic Asian adults (2.7%) compared with all other race and Hispanic-origin groups. Hispanic (47.%) and non-hispanic black (46.8%) adults had a higher prevalence of obesity than non-hispanic white adults (37.9%). The pattern among women was similar to the pattern in the overall adult population. The prevalence of obesity was 38.% in non-hispanic white, 54.8% in non-hispanic black, 4.8% in non-hispanic Asian, and 5.6% in Hispanic women. Among men, the prevalence of obesity was lower in non-hispanic Asian adults (.%) compared with non-hispanic white (37.9%), non-hispanic black (36.9%), and Hispanic (43.%) men. Non-Hispanic black men had a lower prevalence of obesity than Hispanic men, but there was no significant difference between non-hispanic black and non-hispanic white men (Figure 2). Figure 2. Age-adjusted prevalence of obesity among adults aged and over, by sex and race and Hispanic origin: United States, 5 6 6 Non-Hispanic white Non-Hispanic black Non-Hispanic Asian Hispanic,2 54.8 5,2 46.8,2 47.,2 5.6,4 43. 4 37.9 37.9,3,4 36.9 38. 3 2.7 4. 4.8 Total Men Women Significantly different from non-hispanic Asian persons. 2 Significantly different from non-hispanic white persons. 3 Significantly different from Hispanic persons. 4 Significantly different from women of same race and Hispanic origin. NOTES: All estimates are age adjusted by the direct method to the U.S. census population using the age groups 39, 4 59, and 6 and over. Access data table for Figure 2 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db288_table.pdf#2. SOURCE: NCHS, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 5 6. 2

NCHS Data Brief No. 288 October 7 Among non-hispanic black, non-hispanic Asian, and Hispanic adults, women had a higher prevalence of obesity than men. There was no significant difference in prevalence between non-hispanic white men and women. What was the prevalence of obesity among youth aged 2 9 years in 5 6? The prevalence of obesity among U.S. youth was 8.5% in 5 6. Overall, the prevalence of obesity among adolescents (2 9 years) (.6%) and school-aged children (6 years) (8.4%) was higher than among preschool-aged children (2 5 years) (3.9%). School-aged boys (.4%) had a higher prevalence of obesity than preschool-aged boys (4.3%). Adolescent girls (.9%) had a higher prevalence of obesity than preschool-aged girls (3.5%) (Figure 3). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of obesity between boys and girls overall or by age group. Figure 3. Prevalence of obesity among youth aged 2 9 years, by sex and age: United States, 5 6 3 2 9 years 2 5 years 6 years 2 9 years 25 5 8.5 3.9 8.4.6 9. 4.3.4.2 7.8 3.5 6.3.9 5 Total Boys Girls Significantly different from those aged 2 5 years. NOTE: Access data table for Figure 3 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db288_table.pdf#3. SOURCE: NCHS, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 5 6. 3

NCHS Data Brief No. 288 October 7 Were there differences in the prevalence of obesity among youth aged 2 9 years by race and Hispanic origin in 5 6? The prevalence of obesity among non-hispanic black (22.%) and Hispanic (25.8%) youth was higher than among both non-hispanic white (4.%) and non-hispanic Asian (.%) youth. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of obesity between non-hispanic white and non-hispanic Asian youth or between non-hispanic black and Hispanic youth. The pattern among girls was similar to the pattern in all youth. The prevalence of obesity was 25.% in non-hispanic black, 23.6% in Hispanic, 3.5% in non-hispanic white, and.% in non-hispanic Asian girls. The pattern among boys was similar to the pattern in all youth, except Hispanic boys (28.%) had a higher prevalence of obesity than non-hispanic black boys (9.%) (Figure 4). There were no significant differences in the prevalence of obesity between boys and girls by race and Hispanic origin. Figure 4. Prevalence of obesity among youth aged 2 9 years, by sex and race and Hispanic origin: United States, 5 6 3 Non-Hispanic white Non-Hispanic black Non-Hispanic Asian Hispanic 3 28. 25,2 25.8,2 25.,2 23.6,2 22. 9. 5 4.. 4.6.7 3.5. 5 Total Boys Girls Significantly different from non-hispanic Asian persons. 2 Significantly different from non-hispanic white persons. 3 Significantly different from non-hispanic black persons. NOTE: Access data table for Figure 4 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db288_table.pdf#4. SOURCE: NCHS, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 5 6. 4

NCHS Data Brief No. 288 October 7 What are the trends in adult and childhood obesity? From 999 through 5 6, a significantly increasing trend in obesity was observed in both adults and youth. The observed change in prevalence between 3 4 and 5 6, however, was not significant among both adults and youth (Figure 5). Figure 5. Trends in obesity prevalence among adults aged and over (age adjusted) and youth aged 2 9 years: United States, 999 through 5 6 4 3 3.5 Adults 3.5 32.2 34.3 33.7 35.7 34.9 37.7 39.6 3.9 5.4 7. 5.4 6.8 6.9 6.9 7.2 8.5 Youth 999 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 Survey years Significant increasing linear trend from 999 through 5 6. NOTES: All estimates for adults are age adjusted by the direct method to the U.S. census population using the age groups 39, 4 59, and 6 and over. Access data table for Figure 5 at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db288_table.pdf#5. SOURCE: NCHS, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 999 6. 5

NCHS Data Brief No. 288 October 7 Summary The prevalence of obesity was 39.8% among adults and 8.5% among youth in the United States in 5 6. The prevalence of obesity was higher among adults aged 4 59 than among adults aged 39 overall and in both men and women. Among youth, the prevalence of obesity among those aged 2 5 years was lower compared with older children, and this pattern was seen in both boys and girls. Women had a higher prevalence of obesity than men among non-hispanic black, non-hispanic Asian, and Hispanic adults, but not among non-hispanic white adults. Among youth, there was no significant difference in obesity prevalence between boys and girls of the same race and Hispanic origin. Overall, non-hispanic black and Hispanic adults and youth had a higher prevalence of obesity compared with other race and Hispanic-origin groups. Obesity prevalence was lower among non-hispanic Asian men and women compared with other race and Hispanic-origin groups. Among men, obesity prevalence was similar between non-hispanic black and non-hispanic white men, but obesity prevalence was higher among Hispanic men compared with non-hispanic black men. For women, obesity prevalence was similar among non-hispanic black and Hispanic women, and both groups had a higher prevalence of obesity than non-hispanic white women. Among youth, obesity prevalence among non-hispanic black and Hispanic youth was higher than both non-hispanic white and non-hispanic Asian youth. This pattern was similar among boys and girls, except Hispanic boys had a higher obesity prevalence than non-hispanic black boys. Obesity prevalence increased in both adults and youth during the 8 years between 999 and 5 6. Previous analyses showed no change in prevalence among youth between 3 4 and 3 4 (2). In addition, the observed increase in prevalence between 3 4 and 5 6 was not significant among youth or adults. Obesity is defined using cut points of body mass index (BMI). BMI does not measure body fat directly, and the relationship between BMI and body fat varies by sex, age, and race and Hispanic origin (3,4). Morbidity and mortality risk may vary between different race and Hispanic-origin groups at the same BMI. Among some Asian subgroups, risk may begin to increase at a lower BMI compared with other race and Hispanic-origin groups, although study results have varied (5,6). The definition of obesity is based on BMI for both youth and adults, but the definitions are not directly comparable. Among adults, there is a set cut point based on health risk, while among children, the definition is statistical and is based on a comparison to a reference population (7). The prevalence of obesity in the United States remains higher than the Healthy People goals of 4.5% among youth and 3.5% among adults (8). Definition Obesity: BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, rounded to one decimal place. Obesity in adults was defined as a BMI of greater than or equal to 3. Obesity in youth was defined as a BMI of greater than or equal to the age- and sex-specific 95th percentile of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts (7). 6

Data source and methods NCHS Data Brief No. 288 October 7 Data from nine 2-year cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) (999, 2, 3 4, 5 6, 7 8, 9, 2, 3 4, and 5 6) were used for these analyses. Data from NHANES 5 6 were used to test differences between subgroups. This 2-year NHANES survey cycle provides the most recent estimates of obesity. However, the precision of the estimated prevalence of obesity and the ability to detect differences in the prevalence when a difference does exist are lower than when estimates are based on 4 years of data because of the smaller sample sizes. In testing for trends in obesity, orthogonal contrasts were used with the nine 2-year cycles. NHANES is a cross-sectional survey designed to monitor the health and nutritional status of the civilian noninstitutionalized U.S. population (9). The survey consists of interviews conducted in participants homes and standardized physical examinations, including measured height and weight, in mobile examination centers. The NHANES sample is selected through a complex, multistage probability design. Starting in, non-hispanic black, non-hispanic Asian, and Hispanic persons, among other groups, were oversampled to obtain reliable estimates for these population subgroups. Race- and Hispanic origin-specific estimates reflect individuals reporting only one race; those reporting more than one race are included in the total but are not reported separately. Examination sample weights, which account for the differential probabilities of selection, nonresponse, and noncoverage, were incorporated into the estimation process. All variance estimates accounted for the complex survey design by using Taylor series linearization. Pregnant females were excluded from analyses. Prevalence estimates for the adult population aged and over were age adjusted using the direct method to the projected U.S. census population using the age groups 39, 4 59, and 6 and over. Differences between groups were tested using a univariate t statistic at the p <.5 significance level. All differences reported are statistically significant unless otherwise indicated. Adjustments were not made for multiple comparisons. Data management and statistical analyses were conducted using SAS System for Windows version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, N.C.), SUDAAN version. (RTI International, Research Triangle Park, N.C.), and R version 3.4. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), including the R survey package () to account for the complex sample design. About the authors Craig M. Hales, Margaret D. Carroll, Cheryl D. Fryar, and Cynthia L. Ogden are with the National Center for Health Statistics, Division of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. References. National Institutes of Health. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults The evidence report. Obes Res 6(Suppl 2):5S 9S. 998. 7

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics 33 Toledo Road, Room 455, MS P8 Hyattsville, MD 782 64 FIRST CLASS MAIL POSTAGE & FEES PAID CDC/NCHS PERMIT NO. G-284 OFFICIAL BUSINESS PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, $3 For more NCHS Data Briefs, visit: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs.htm. NCHS Data Brief No. 288 October 7 2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 4. NCHS data brief, no 29. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 5. 3. Flegal KM, Ogden CL, Yanovski JA, Freedman DS, Shepherd JA, Graubard BI, Borrud LG. High adiposity and high body mass index-for-age in U.S. children and adolescents overall and by race-ethnic group. Am J Clin Nutr 9(4): 6.. 4. Deurenberg P, Deurenberg-Yap M, Guricci S. Asians are different from Caucasians and from each other in their body mass index/body fat per cent relationship. Obes Rev 3(3):4 6. 2. 5. Jafar TH, Islam M, Poulter N, Hatcher J, Schmid CH, Levey AS, Chaturvedi N. Children in South Asia have higher body mass-adjusted blood pressure levels than white children in the United States: A comparative study. Circulation ():29 7. 5. 6. Zheng W, McLerran DF, Rolland B, Zhang X, Inoue M, Matsuo K, et al. Association between body-mass index and risk of death in more than million Asians. N Engl J Med 364(8):79 29.. 7. Ogden CL, Flegal KM. Changes in terminology for childhood overweight and obesity. National health statistics reports; no 25. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.. 8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People Topics & Objectives: Nutrition and weight status. Available from: https://www.healthypeople. gov//topics-objectives/topic/nutrition-and-weight-status. 9. Johnson CL, Dohrmann SM, Burt VL, Mohadjer LK. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: Sample design, 4. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2(62). 4.. Lumley T. Survey: Analysis of complex survey samples. R package (Version 3.32) [computer program]. 7. Suggested citation Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 5 6. NCHS data brief, no 288. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 7. Copyright information All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated. National Center for Health Statistics Charles J. Rothwell, M.S., M.B.A., Director Jennifer H. Madans, Ph.D., Associate Director for Science Division of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys Kathryn S. Porter, M.D., M.S., Director Ryne Paulose-Ram, Ph.D., Associate Director for Science For e-mail updates on NCHS publication releases, subscribe online at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/govdelivery.htm. For questions or general information about NCHS: Tel: 8 CDC INFO ( 8 232 4636) TTY: 888 232 6348 Internet: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs Online request form: https://www.cdc.gov/info ISSN 94 4927 Print ed. ISSN 94 4935 Online ed. DHHS Publication No. 8 9 CS283424